From #NeverTrump to #NeverClinton


Hillary 2016 - Laws R 4 Little People

Here is a post that I pray provokes the sting of reality to Conservatives that are taking the Never Trump stand. If you enjoyed the last 7 ½ years Obama’s Leftist fundamental transformation of America, by all means write-in your favorite Conservative, vote for a Third Party or don’t vote at all. Following the Never Trump path will ensure the election of Obama’s third term vicariously through Crooked Hillary.

 

Honestly answering Mark Alexander’s check list of “Who is more likely to …”, should shake a Never Trumper out of their righteous indignation and principled hubris over Donald Trump’s perceived lack of integrity and at least give him a shot to keep at least some of his promises.

 

If the Donald screws up, how bad could it be compared to the continued dilution of America’s moral fiber and divested Liberty with another four to eight years of a Leftist POTUS?

 

JRH 7/29/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

From #NeverTrump to #NeverClinton

Vote for the Supreme Court! Choosing not to vote for the “lesser of two evils” is a vote for the greater of those evils.

 

By Mark Alexander

July 27, 2016

The Patriot Post

 

“In the midst of these pleasing ideas we should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.” —John Adams (1797)

 

Hillary v Trump

Hillary v Trump

 

(Aggravation Alert: I have received a considerable number of objections from fellow Patriots this year complaining either that my analysis of Donald Trump was too hard or too soft. This column is directed at those who believe either one to be true — the #NeverClinton and #NeverTrump folks who plan to abstain or vote for a third-party candidate.)

 

It’s no small irony that the Socialist Democratic Party is hosting its confab in Philadelphia this week, the cradle of Liberty and Rule of Law.

 

On the opening night, Bernie Sanders, the candidate who was narrowly defeated by Clinton thanks to hacked DNC emails indicating they rigged the primary, offered this assessment of the last eight years: “Together, my friends, we have begun a political revolution to transform America, and that revolution — our revolution — continues.”

 

If that sounds familiar, it should. That “political revolution to transform America” would be the fulfillment of Obama’s 2008 campaign promise of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

 

On the other hand, Republicans should be debating the re-election of Mitt Romney this year, but we aren’t. Here’s why.

 

Without debating Romney’s merits all over again, the reason that the contest this year is not between Romney/Ryan and Clinton/Kaine is because millions of “faith and values” voters chose to sit it out in 2012. Weeks before the 2012 election, I had a very intelligent young Christian woman ask a question far too typical of evangelicals: “Can you really vote for a Mormon?”

 

Of course, in addition to those evangelicals, there were also millions of principled conservatives who didn’t cast their ballots in 2012, protesting that Romney was a centrist, moderate, Northeastern elitist.

 

So how did that work out?

 

Four more years of Barack Obama’s colossal failures in both domestic and foreign policy.

 

Let’s review.

 

Obama’s domestic policies have been defined by his litany of lies and legacy of scandals, most notably the failure of his so-called “economic recovery” plan; his long list of ObamaCare lies; his IRS Enemies List targeting conservatives; his “Fast and Furious” gun control ploy; the VA death panels cover-up; the immigration crisis on our southern border, and the long-overdue resignation of his corrupt attorney general, Eric Holder.

 

The Obama-Clinton foreign policy malfeasance is unparalleled in American history, including the Benghazi cover-up ahead of the 2012 election; the “Russian Spring” in Crimea; the hollow “Red Line” in the Syrian sand; the Middle East meltdown in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Jordan and Gaza; the disintegration of Iraq; the dramatic resurgence of al-Qa’ida; the rise of the Islamic State; and the re-emergence of Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, which is now metastasizing into Western Europe and North America.

 

All that being the case, once again, millions of conservatives are reluctant to vote because the choices are the assurance of extending Obama’s disgraceful legacy for four more years under a Clinton regime or the prospect that Donald Trump will prove to be the “lesser of two evils” come January 2017.

 

For value and principle conservatives wrestling with whether to vote for Trump or not at all, political philosophers and moral theologians have written for generations about the “incommensurability in values,” or, in common parlance, choosing between the lesser of two evils.

 

Some of my conservative friends subscribe to the observation of 19th century British theologian Charles Spurgeon, who wrote, “Of two evils, choose neither.” But Spurgeon’s words, as related to evil actions, are taken out of context in reference to civic duty. Of such duties, Spurgeon said, “I would not, however, say … despise the privilege which you have as citizens.”

 

The question of voting for Trump is no quandary for me.

 

Obama in a blie Hillary outfit toom by Ramirez

Obama in a blue Hillary outfit

 

While I understand well the nature of presidential character, and believe both Clinton and Trump fall substantially short of that character, I also understand that the outcome of the November election will not only determine our president for at least the next four years, but also the composition of the Supreme Court for at least the next quarter-century. Think about that before you decide to stay home this year or to cast a “protest vote” for a third-party candidate.

 

On this point, I would state emphatically that those who choose to sit this election out or “choose neither” are making a choice. In fact, I would argue that handing this election to Hillary Clinton is far more evil than choosing the lesser of the two. If you can’t vote for Trump, then at least vote against Clinton. If you can’t vote for Trump, then at least vote for the Supreme Court. And make no mistake: A vote this year for a third-party candidate in any state where the Clinton v Trump contest is close constitutes a vote for Clinton and a third term for Obama. Period.

 

After the conservative congressional advances across the nation in 2010 and 2014, despite the needless presidential loss in 2012, throwing this year’s contest to Clinton would be disastrous.

 

Conservative political analyst Dennis Prager wrote a letter “To My Conservative #NeverTrump Friends,” in which he makes the case for supporting Trump:

 

“The ‘conscience’ argument that one can sleep with a clear conscience by not voting for Trump [asserts] that your conscience is clear after making it possible for Clinton to win. … In the 2016 presidential race, I am not interested in moral purity. I am interested in defeating the left and its party, the Democratic Party. The notion … that we can live with another four years of a Democratic president is, forgive me, mind-boggling. To that end … multiple additional leftists on the Supreme Court, a Republican presidential victory in 2020 would mean nothing. … Left-wing judges pass so many left-wing laws that they render those who control Congress, and even the White House, almost irrelevant. I just don’t understand how anyone who understands the threat the left and the Democrats pose on America will refuse to vote for the only person who can stop them.”

 

(Notably, Prager argues that Trump’s convention speech was not “dark enough.”)

 

Last week, Donald Trump delivered his GOP convention acceptance speech, outlining in the broadest terms what his objectives would be if elected president.

This week, Hillary Clinton will conclude the DNC convention with a similar speech, promising mostly the antithesis of the Trump platform. And it is unlikely that any of her adoring media will highlight her extensive record of incompetence and lawlessness.

 

Hillary-BHO mock voters for obeying law

Hillary-BHO mocking law

 

In advance of Clinton’s diatribe, we compiled a list of questions for consideration by those who are not yet committed to vote for Trump. Our editors have expanded that list to include the following questions:

 

Who will achieve more with Republicans in Congress?

 

Who will nominate judges for the federal bench and Supreme Court who will uphold Rule of Law?

 

Who is more likely to formulate and enforce stronger foreign policy in an effort to restore America’s standing in the world?

 

Who is more likely to seek to begin rebuilding America’s military might?

 

Who is more likely to implement policies to protect America and the West from catastrophic terrorist attacks?

 

Who is more likely to clearly identify the greatest ideological threat to the West as “Islamic extremism”?

 

Who is more likely to treat our nation’s military personnel and veterans with the dignity and respect they have earned?

 

Who is more likely to enforce immigration laws and protect American borders?

 

Who is more likely to support the Second Amendment?

 

Who is more likely to reduce taxes?

 

Who is more likely to balance a budget?

 

Who is more likely to address our ruinous national debt?

 

Who is more likely to be a better communicator of free market principles?

 

Who is more likely to reduce oppressive central government regulations?

 

Who is more likely to repeal ObamaCare and implement market solutions for health care?

 

Who is more likely to repeal the onerous Dodd-Frank regulations?

 

Who has more experience creating and protecting American jobs?

 

Who is more likely to promote Americanism rather than globalism?

 

Who is more likely to flex American muscle when dealing with foreign tyrants?

 

Who is more likely to aggressively pursue energy exploration?

 

Who is more likely to re-write trade agreements that undermine the U.S. economy?

 

Who is more likely to populate their administration with free enterprise advocates?

 

Who is more likely to advocate for retention of Republican majorities in the House and Senate?

 

Who is more likely to resist the influence of Wall Street?

 

Who is more likely to reject Obama’s unconstitutional executive overreach?

 

Who is more likely to denounce Black Lives Matter and other Democrat Party fronts seeking to disunite America?

 

I’m sure you can add to this list, and I’m equally sure that Trump will fare better across the board than Clinton.

 

In her convention remarks, Michelle Obama declared, “This election … is about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives.” Indeed it is, and well into the next generation. Will our children and their children fare better with leadership from Democrats on the Left or Republicans on the Right?

 

So to my fellow conservatives who don’t plan to vote in 2016, I ask the following: What will our nation look like in 2020? How about 2030?

 

I ask this question not only as a citizen and fellow Patriot, but also as one who, like many other Patriots, has family blood on the line in this election. As the father of a young Marine who is bound by oath to “Support and Defend” our Constitution, I am, like so many of you, deeply concerned about who will be our next commander in chief.

 

The last seven years have been very demoralizing for those of us who are in the trenches every day advocating for Liberty. But take heart. While Liberty is eternal, the contest to maintain its beacon of freedom is also eternal, and sitting this election out or voting for a third-party candidate in a closely contested state only makes that contest more difficult.

 

Finally, the Demos are very divided. Let’s finish them off. Hillary Clinton is a deeply flawed status quo candidate in an election year for change. My advice to anyone who hasn’t yet committed to vote for Trump and the Supreme Court, or at least vote against Clinton: Embrace the suck. Just do it, and convince everyone you know to do the same.

 

(Read our analysis of Hillary Clinton’s DNC convention diatribe, and her plans to take our nation to a much darker place.

 

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis

 

________________

*PUBLIUS*

 

The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the “unalienable rights” of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2016 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

 

REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post (http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/)”

 

[The Patriot Post depends on voluntary support from readers for operations]

 

The Patriot Post
PO Box 507
Chattanooga, TN 37401

Dems Deceive


4-D's of Democratic Party

John R. Houk

© July 28, 2016

 

If you were foolish enough to tune into the Democratic National Convention (DNC) you will noticed the Party faithful spinning lies by twisting the words of Donald Trump to provide the illusion the GOP candidate said something he did not. Then Dem Party speaker after speaker took the spun lies to deride Donald Trump. Now I realize Trump is very far away from the perfect Conservative candidate; nevertheless, to create a lie then turn around and have the hubris to lie about how grand Crooked Hillary is – well is galling!

 

Obama’s FBI gave her a pass in having an unsecured private server. In which she dispersed Classified information which included lying that she never worked with Classified emails because of the moronic stipulation that nothing was Classified at the time. Friends, Democrats and Leftists – this was felonious behavior! Others have been prosecuted and found guilty in doing much less.

 

BUT WAIT! The FBI is still investigating Crooked Hillary on the actions of the Clinton Foundation receiving MILLIONS of dollars from Muslim nations in which Radical (as defined by the PC crowd) Islam is a part of official policy just before and while she was Secretary of State. Unfortunately, though, who believes the FBI or the Justice Department will ever prosecute Crooked Hillary and Slick Willy for any kind of felonious crime while Barack Hussein Obama is President of the United States?

 

VIDEO: Persian Gulf sheikhs gave Clinton’s $100 million

 

 

Posted by Habibur Rahman

Published on Jul 1, 2016

 

Persian Gulf sheikhs gave Clintons $100 million – WND.com

 

So Hillary is crooked but praised by the Dems and the Left-oriented Mainstream Media (MSM). AND I have heard nothing but praise for Hillary’s VP choice for running mate (including GOP Senators and Congressmen). It seems to be axiomatic that the Dems are guilty of lying, manipulation and deception because the VP selection in Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia also follows the Dem crookedness.

 

An ACT for America email alert is warning their readers that Tim Kaine has extensive connections to Muslim Brotherhood (MB) front organizations in America. If you are reading this and only have your eyes and ears to the MSM you may not realize that anything to do with the MB means what the PC crowd calls Radical Islam. And Radical Islam’s global agenda to establish a transnational Caliphate to rule the world under Islamic Supremacism. That means Islamic terrorism and war against the West – the United States of America in particular.

 

This is the shame of the Democratic Party, Crooked Hillary and Senator Tim Kaine.

 

JRH 7/28/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Clinton VP Pick Tim Kaine’s Islamist Ties

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent July 26, 2016 12:48 PM

 

Hillary Clinton has chosen Virginia Senator Tim Kaine as her VP, but his suspicious history of Islamic ties has raised some red flags. Kaine has a background in funding Islamic organizations, has appointed a Hamas sympathizer as a Muslim Brotherhood front leader, and even spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect.

Can we really trust this kind of “leadership” in our White House?  The upcoming elections may be the most important in our nation’s history.  We urge you to get educated and think carefully about who is best to protect our nation and its democratic freedoms in the years ahead.

 

CONTINUED BELOW FROM EMAIL ALERT LINK

______________

Clinton VP Pick Tim Kaine’s Islamist Ties

 

By Ryan Mauro

2016-07-26 

ACT for America

Originally: Clarion Project

 

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s newly-announced running mate, Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, has a history of embracing Islamists. He appointed a Hamas supporter to a state immigration commission; spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect and received donations from well-known Islamist groups.

 

Appointing a Muslim Brotherhood Front Leader Who Supports Hamas

 

In 2007, Kaine was the Governor of Virginia and, of all people chose Muslim American Society (MAS) President Esam Omeish to the state’s Immigration Commission. A Muslim organization against Islamism criticized the appointment and reckless lack of vetting.

 

Federal prosecutors said in a 2008 court filing that MAS was “founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.” A Chicago Tribune investigation in 2004 confirmed this, as well as MAS’ crafty use of deceptive semantics to appear moderate. Convicted terrorist and admitted U.S. Muslim Brotherhood member Abdurrahman Alamoudi testified in 2012, “Everyone knows that MAS is the Muslim Brotherhood.”

 

Read our fully-documented profile of MAS here.

 

According to Omeish’s website, he was also president of the National Muslim Students Association (click there to read our profile about its Muslim Brotherhood origins) and served for two years on the national board of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which the Justice Department also labeled as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas-financing trial.

 

His website says he was the vice president of Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, a radical mosque known for its history of terror ties, including having future Al-Qaeda operative Anwar Al-Awlaki as its imam and being frequented by two of the 9/11 hijackers and Nidal Hasan, the perpetrator of the Fort Hood shooting. Omeish’s website says he remains a board member.

 

Omeish’s website also says he was a member of the board of Islamic American University, which had Hamas financier and Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yousef Al-Qaradawi chairman of its board until at least 2006.

 

Omeish was also chairman of the board for the Islamic Center of Passaic County, a New Jersey mosque with heavy terrorist ties and an imam that the Department of Homeland Security wants to deport for having links to Hamas.

 

Omeish directly expressed extremism before Kaine appointed him. He claimed the Brotherhood is “moderate” and admitted that he and MAS are influenced by the Islamist movement.

 

In 2004, Omeish praised the Hamas spiritual leader as “our beloved Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.” Videotape from 2000 also surfaced where Omeish pledged to help Palestinians who understand “the jihad way is the way to liberate your land” (he denied this was an endorsement of violence).

 

When a state delegate wrote a letter to then-Governor Kaine warning him that the MAS has “questionable origins,” a Kaine spokesperson said the charge was bigotry.

 

Kaine obviously failed to do any kind of basic background checking in Omeish.

 

Omeish resigned under heavy pressure, and Kaine acknowledged that his statements “concerned” him. But, apparently, they didn’t concern him enough to actually learn about the Muslim Brotherhood network in his state and to take greater precautions in the future.

 

Speaking at a Dinner Honoring Muslim Brotherhood Terror Suspect

 

In September 2011, Kaine spoke at a “Candidates Night” dinner organized by the New Dominion PAC that presented a Lifetime Achievement Award for Jamal Barzinji, who the Global Muslim Brotherhood Watch describes as a “founding father of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.”

 

He first came on to the FBI’s radar in 1987-1988 when an informant inside the Brotherhood identified Barzinji and his associated groups as being part of a network of Brotherhood fronts to “institute the Islamic Revolution in the United States.” The source said Barzinji and his colleagues were “organizing political support which involves influencing both public opinion in the United States as well as the United States Government” using “political action front groups with no traceable ties.”

 

Barzinji had his home searched as part of a terrorism investigation in 2003. U.S. Customs Service Senior Special Agent David Kane said in a sworn affidavit that Barzinji and the network of entities he led were investigated because he “is not only closed associated with PIJ [Palestinian Islamic Jihad]…but also with Hamas.”  Counter-terrorism reporter Patrick Poole broke the story that Barzinji was nearly prosecuted but the Obama Justice Department dropped plans for indictment.

 

Barzinji played a major role in nearly every Brotherhood front in the U.S. and was vice president of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), which came under terrorism investigation also. Barzinji’s group was so close to Palestinian Islamic Jihad operative Sami Al-Arian that IIIT’s President considered his group and Al-Arian’s to be essentially one entity.

 

The indictment of Al-Arian and his colleagues says that they “would and did seek to obtain support from influential individuals, in the United States under the guise of promoting and protecting Arab rights (emphasis mine).”

 

The quotes about Brotherhood operative Barzinji’s aspirations to use civil rights advocacy as a means to influence politicians are especially relevant when you consider that video from the event honoring Barzinji shows Kaine saying that it was his fourth time at the annual dinner and thanked his “friends” that organized it for helping him in his campaign for lieutenant-governor and governor and asked them to help his Senate campaign.

 

Islamist Financial Support

 

Barzinji’s organization, IIIT, donated $10,000 in 2011 to the New Dominion PAC, the organization that held the event honoring Barzinji that Kaine spoke at. The Barzinji-tied New Dominion PAC donated $43,050 to Kaine’s gubernatorial campaign between 2003 and 2005. That figure doesn’t even include other political recipients that assisted Kaine’s campaign.

 

The PAC has very strong ties to the Democratic Party in Virginia, with the Virginia Public Access Project tallying almost $257,000 in donations. This likely explains why Barzinji’s grandson served in Governor McAuliffe’s administration and then became the Obama Administration’s liaison to the Muslim-American community.

 

The Middle East Forum’s Islamist Money in Politics database shows another $4,300 donated to Kaine’s Senate campaign in 2011-2012 by officials from U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Another $3,500 came from Hisham Al-Talib, a leader from Barzinji’s IIIT organization.

 

It’s worth noting that Barzinji’s IIIT donated $3,500 to Esam Omeish’s 2009 campaign delegate campaign, tying together the cadre of Muslim Brotherhood-linked leaders who got into Kaine’s orbit.

 

Conclusion

 

Kaine has no excuse. If he has an Internet connection, then he and his staff should have known about their backgrounds. They were either extremely careless (something Kaine would have in common with the top of the ticket) or knew and looked the other way in the hopes of earning donations and votes.

 

Clinton’s choice of Kaine is widely seen as a way of strengthening her campaign’s national security credentials. Yet, Clinton is asking us to trust a candidate on national security who appoints a Hamas supporter to an immigration commission and speaks at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect.

+++

SEE ALSO: Persian Gulf Sheikhs Gave Bill & Hillary $100 Million; Daily Caller; 5/11/2016 10:39 PM 

______________

Dems Deceive

John R. Houk

© July 28, 2016

____________

Clinton VP Pick Tim Kaine’s Islamist Ties

 

Copyright © 2016 ACT for America, All rights reserved.

 

DONATE TO ACT for America

 

Our mailing address is:

ACT for America

869 Lynnhaven PKWY

Ste. 113 #411

Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Hillary the Liar & the KKK


Will Quig - CA KKK

John R. Houk

© April 27, 2016

 

American Action News has found a video that may or not be from the Ku Klux Klan endorsing, wait for it … crooked Hillary Clinton for President.

 

Vocative claims the spokesman in the video is Will Quig, Grand Dragon of the California KKK.

 

I have no doubts the Clinton campaign will refute any acceptance of a KKK endorsement; nonetheless there are some half-truths in the video.

 

The age old political party of KKK choice is the Democratic Party:

 

 

History reveals that the Republican Party was formed in 1854 to abolish slavery and challenge other racist legislative acts initiated by the Democratic Party.

 

Some called it the Civil War, others called it the War Between the States, but to the African Americans at that time, it was the War Between the Democrats and the Republicans over slavery. The Democrats gave their lives to expand it, Republican gave their lives to ban it.

 

 

History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

 

After the Civil War, Democrats murdered several hundred black elected officials (in the South) to regain control of the southern government. …

 

 

Congressional records show that Democrats were opposed to passing the following laws that were introduced by Republicans to achieve civil rights for African Americans:

 

** Civil Rights Act 1866

 

** Reconstruction Act of 1867

 

** Freedman Bureau Extension Act of 1866

 

** Enforcement Act of 1870

 

** Force Act of 1871

 

** Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871

 

** Civil Rights Act of 1875

** Civil Rights Act of 1957

 

** Civil Rights Act of 1960

 

** And during the 60’s many Democrats fought hard to defeat the 1964 Civil Rights Act

 

** 1965 Voting Rights Acts

 

** 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act [Bold text and bullets by the Blog Editor]

 

… It was also the racist Jim Crow practices initiated by Democrats that brought about the two landmark cases of Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v. The Board of Education.

 

At the turn of the century (1900), Southern Democrats continued to oppress African Americans by placing thousands in hard-core prison labor camps. According to most historians, the prison camps were far worst than slavery. The prisoners were required to work from 10-14 hours a day, six to seven days a week in temperatures that exceeded 100 degrees and in temperatures that fell well below zero. …

 

History reveals that it was three white persons that opposed the Democrat’s racist practices who started the NAACP. Dr. Martin Luther King, several Civil Rights leaders and many historians reported that during the first two years of his administration, President John F. Kennedy ignored Dr. King’s request for Civil Rights. The chronicles of history reveal that it was only after television coverage of riots and several demonstrations did President Kennedy feel a need to introduce the 1963 Civil Rights Act. At that time, experts believe the nation was headed toward a major race war.

 

History reveals that it was Democratic Attorney General, Robert Kennedy that approved the secret wire taps on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and it was Democratic President Lyndon Johnson that referred to Dr. King as ” that nigger preacher.”

 

… You get the Dem Party picture – READ ENTIRETY (The Racist History of the Democratic Party; By Wayne Perryman; History News Network; 2/14/04)

 

California KKK spokesman Quig claims Hillary’s views that disagree with KKK ideology is simply political hype to get votes to be elected. In other words, Hillary is lying for political gain. Hillary is a proven liar!

 

….

 

Hillary Clinton has a long history of tall tales.  Some designed to make her appear brave, such as her lie about coming under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996.  Others connectED her to someone famous, such as her claim to be named after Sir Edmund Hillary.  Except that Sir Edmund, at the time of Hillary Clinton’s birth, was simply Ed, an obscure New Zealand beekeeper.

 

 

Mrs. Clinton lied about a video causing the Benghazi terror attack and is now doubling down, denying she lied to the victims’ families about the video, blaming her fabrication on the “fog of war.”  There’s also her emails, which she lied about to Congress and the American people.  These aren’t the inconsequential fabrications about whom she was named after, but serious false statements involving loss of American life and compromised U.S. foreign policy and national security.

 

 

But lying is not a recent phenomenon for Mrs. Clinton.  William Safire, of the NY Times, wrote in 1996 that Hillary “is a congenital liar.”  He noted a string of deception beginning in Arkansas and following her to the White House – cattle futures, Travelgate, Whitewater, lost billing records, and missing FBI files, to name some of her most prominent deceptions and cover-ups.

 

Going even farther back in history to the 1970s, Hillary Clinton was fired from her staff position on the Watergate House Judiciary Committee over “lies and unethical behavior.”

 

Is a pattern of compulsive lying by a presidential candidate a legitimate concern?  Are Mrs. Clinton’s lies about Benghazi and emails part of a longstanding pattern?  Are they READ ENTIRETY (Is Hillary Clinton a compulsive liar? By Brian C Joondeph; American Thinker; 1/26/16)

 

More articles documenting crooked Hillary, the liar:

 

Hillary Clinton’s million little lies; By Michael Walsh; New York Post; 11/26/15 2:26pm

Liar, Liar, Pantsuit on Fire: 27 Hillary Fibs, Obfuscations, and Lies; By

BEN SHAPIRO; Breitbart; 10/14/15)

The truth (and lies) behind why Hillary is unfit to be president; By LISA BOOTHE; Washington Examiner; 3/23/16 1201 AM

Top 50 Hillary Clinton Benghazi Lies; By Peter Andrew; ConservativeAmerica.org; 9/16/14

The Hillary Clinton Lies List; By David Kraemer; ConservativeAmerica.org; 8/17/14

 

If you did a little looking yourself, I am confident a treasure trove of Hillary can be discovered by you too.

 

JRH 4/27/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

How the KKK is Helping Hillary

 

American Action News

Source: Vocativ

Vocative Date: Apr 25, 2016 at 6:11 PM ET

 

VIDEO: KKK Claims $20K In Clinton Donations

 

 

Posted by Vocativ

Published on Apr 25, 2016

 

A Grand Dragon of the California Klan claims to have raised about $20K for her campaign.

 

_________________________

Hillary the Liar & the KKK

John R. Houk

© April 27, 2016

________________________

How the KKK is Helping Hillary

American Action News

203 S. Union St., Suite 300

Alexandria, VA 22314

(571) 293-0941

THE AGENDA 2015


THE AGENDA


Yesterday I cross posted Danny Jeffrey’s insightful essay “JEWS, NETANYAHU, FRANCE, ISLAM AND THE AGENDA”. Danny posted another essay he bills as a continuing of the conversation of the essay I cross posted. It is entitled “THE AGENDA 2015”.
 
Conspiracy Theorists who see the word “Agenda” undoubtedly are thinking of Agenda 21. In brief Agenda 21 (More Details: HERE, HERE and HERE) is thought to be a United Nations platform to use land management schemes to control food production, climate effective agendas to pertaining to food production and environmental procedures and concepts of population control. Agenda 21 is wrapped into the platitudes of an agenda for the good of humankind to sell it to the public as a beneficial program. You’ll have to do some of your own reading but I think I can sum up the UN Agenda 21 as an Eco-Marxist plan of collective globalization with power vested in a Marxist oriented global elite. Yup, I’m one of those people that Leftists and RINOs ridicule as being delusional in criticizing Agenda 21.
 
Consider the previous paragraph a ‘side bar’ because Danny’s “The Agenda 2015” is not an Agenda 21 exposé. Danny’s essay just reminded me of the UN’s Agenda 21. Rather Danny’s essay shines light on his belief (which works for me) that Obama is a puppet with slick skills to achieve a Left Wing global transformation by elitist Leftists (although not mentioned in this essay I know from past Danny essays the chief Leftist puppeteer is George Soros). And very importantly he explains how the Left is cooperating with but deluding Islamists as a means to a Leftist end. I feel compelled to also mention that Danny usually does not like the word “Leftist” but prefers using the word that Leftists prefer to call themselves – “Progressives”. (It would be beneficial for you to go to the Fix Bayonets Library and use the “Search This Blog” bar on the right column and type in “George Soros” and “Progressivism”.)
 
JRH 1/16/15

Please Support NCCR

******************************
THE AGENDA 2015
 
By Danny Jeffrey
January 14, 2015 11:05 AM
 
I closed my last essay Jews, Netanyahu, France, Islam, And The Agenda with an open ended lead to exploring The Agenda. Shall we go there?

It is human nature to believe the obvious, but quite often what is obvious is made to appear so to mislead you. When deception is involved we must disregard the obvious and dig for the truth, and when you stand in harm’s way it is best to dig as fast as you can. To that end I have dedicated the last five years to research and revealing to all who would heed my warnings what that research has uncovered.


Hope and Change; we all remember the promises, the hopeful, the gullible, and the deceived. We also recall a wannabe demigod standing before rented Doric columns promising that he would heal the earth and lower the flood waters. So too do we recall his mindless followers, stars in their eyes as they uttered up the platitudes of yet another false messiah. Fortunately for many of those mindless, they know not what they have done, as they will one day die in a state of utter confusion when the reality they have created finally catches up to them. I shall mourn not their passing.

Considerably more intelligent than the above lot is another group of Americans who are well aware that something is drastically wrong but have yet to grasp the ‘Big Picture’. They are the ones who have long been misled by the obvious, leading many to conclude that Obama is either incompetent, a Muslim, or both. The purpose of this essay is to hopefully put an end to both of those mistaken notions, among my readers.

Incompetent? That term is usually applied to anyone who is incapable of doing the job assigned to him. The confusion comes from the fact that you the voter, and the progressive/communist puppet masters that pull Obama’s strings, have assigned him two entirely different tasks. The voters expect him to lead the greatest nation in the world, and the puppet masters expect him to destroy it. Your expectations are being ignored, while Obama attends to every whim of the masters. He is not incompetent, he is doing a brilliant job of once and for all implementing the long sought downfall of America.

Admittedly Obama is not accomplishing this daunting task on his own, as his allies are many. They range from the entire Democratic Party, to the RINOs, to the Media, to the institutions of higher learning, to the other leaders of western civilization, and let us not forget the contributions of apathetic Americans. All are doing their share to shield Obama and the agenda.

Proving conclusively that Obama is not a Muslim is not quite as simple as disproving his incompetence, but I feel up to the task so let us examine first off why so many believe him to be a closet Muslim.

June 4, 2009…Barely six months in office and already enacting hope and change among Islamic radicals as he gave his now famous Cairo speech, demanding that the criminal and outlawed Muslim Brotherhood be present and honored with front row seats.

We all know how that turned out. The MB was soon jailing Mubarak and being elected to lead Egypt. Bad day for Egypt, and the Egyptians soon learned this, and he was deposed by the military and once again Egypt was being led by a strong man government. But the genie was out of the bottle and the Arab Spring had sprung upon the world, compliments of Barrack Hussein Obama, and his masters behind the wizard’s curtain.

Next came Libya. Our Joint Chiefs of Staff told Obama that there was nothing for the U.S. to gain from overthrowing Gaddafi but he persisted, for there was something for his puppet masters to gain … The Anarchy and Chaos they sought. And so A&C ensued and today Libya is another breeding ground for terrorists.

During this time vast sums of foreign aid was being sent to Gaza that helped Hamas prepare for the next war on Israel. Vast sums of foreign aid and weapons were also being sent to the terrorists we were supporting in the attempted overthrow of Syria. Today those terrorists are known as ISIS and rule a great deal of Syria and Iraq, from which we had withdrawn.

Now we have withdrawn our combat forces from Afghanistan and the latest reports tell us that ISIS is showing up there as well.

Meanwhile, back home, the Muslim Brotherhood was infiltrating our government and gaining control of much of our intelligence community, Hillary Clinton was helping Islam get a firm footing in the UN as she developed Resolution 16/18 that empowered Islam and diminished our freedoms. Political correctness was reaching all new heights as the First Amendment was eroded. And let us not forget Obama’s speech before the UN that the future shall not belong to those who slander the prophet.

I could go on and on with such evidence but I am certain that you get my drift, and those who are convinced that Obama is a Muslim should by now feel confident that I am making their point, after all, everything I have written above makes it obvious that Obama is a Muslim. There is that word ‘obvious’ again … So misleading.

Above I have stated many proven facts. Now please bear with me as I ask a question. Are David Cameron, Angela Merkel, President Hollande of France, all of the elected leadership of Scandinavia, most of the leaders of Belgium, Holland, Spain, and the European Union also Muslims? They are doing exactly the same things that Obama is!!! And they all answer to the same puppet masters; the transnational progressives.

They all see the danger that is being presented by the unchecked immigration of Muslims into their nation. Their people cower in fear before a murderous horde and are going to jail for slandering Islam. I detest politics and yet study politicians and their agendas out of fear. One leader that I truly admire, Geert Wilders, is once again facing prison accused of hate speech. No Muslim is being arrested for carrying signs expressing the wish to behead Europeans, but all Europeans are under a threat of jail time for criticizing those bloodthirsty Muslims who parade among them.

 
Geert WildersThe following is a quote from Geert Wilders. What he says here is very important for such events will soon be taking place in the U.S. This is the link from which the quote was taken. That was one helluva speech and should be read by every patriotic American. The link will be repeated below in Suggested Reading. He also tells you in that speech what I have been saying above, that most of the leaders of the west are sacrificing their own people to the Islamist horde.
 
Last Summer, my home town, The Hague, witnessed scenes which brought back memories of the darkest period in our history, the Nazi era. Sympathizers of the Islamic State paraded in our streets. They carried swastikas, they carried the black flags of the Islamic State.

They shouted “Death to the Jews” and “Oh Jews, the army of Mohammed is coming for you”.

In the streets of The Hague in broad daylight.

And instead of rounding up these hatemongers, the Dutch authorities did nothing.

When we in Europa warn against Islam, the authorities call it hate speech and bring us to court. But when the grim forces of hatred march down our streets, the police look on and do not interfere. It is a disgrace. It is a scandal. It is intolerable.
 
Obama spent a very limited part of his childhood in Indonesia learning the ways of Islam, and how to manipulate them. Short of that brief period his education was in pursuit of the Marxist agenda. He tells us all that in his autobiographies. His ‘religious’ inclinations were not in a mosque but in the Marxist, black liberation theology of Jeremiah Wrights ‘church’. In younger days he did not join the black Muslims but was a member of the Marxist New Party.


Yes, he and his masters are taking the Muslims for a ride. Promising them glory as the Caliphate is dangled before their power hungry eyes, but in truth, they are no more than cannon fodder in the masters’ quest for Anarchy and Chaos.



Breitbart … January 13, 2015BRITAIN ON HIGH ALERT FOR POSSIBLE BEHEADING ATTEMPT

Gatestone Institute … January 13, 2015Germany Bracing for Islamic Terror

Breitbart … January 11, 2015NYPD ON HIGH ALERT FOLLOWING ISIS CALL TO ‘RISE UP AND KILL POLICE OFFICERS’

Arutz Sheva … January 11, 2015ISIS Communications Claim Paris Attacks ‘Just the Beginning’

McClatchy  DC … January 11, 2015Despite huge Paris rally, fears of coming conflict

Breitbart … January 11, 2015SAS AND ARMY ON UK STREETS AS AL QAIDA WARNS BRITAIN: YOU’RE NEXT

Arutz Sheva … January 11, 2015French Officers Warned of Active ‘Sleeper Cells’

Reuters … January 8, 2015Britain’s MI5 chief warns al Qaeda in Syria planning mass attacks on West

Oh, those warnings of the danger of Islam do go on and on, but to what end? Western nations are, one and all, writing new laws against ‘extremism’, while defending Islam as the Religion of Peace and jailing their citizens for being extremists when they speak against Islam.


Again quoting Geert Wilders:

 
When we in Europa warn against Islam, the authorities call it hate speech and bring us to court. But when the grim forces of hatred march down our streets, the police look on and do not interfere. It is a disgrace. It is a scandal. It is intolerable.
 
The key to grasping the agenda is in the laws that are being written, laws that are outlawing extremism, but who those laws are applied to?


Breitbart … January 11, 2015
WHITE HOUSE STATEMENT ON ‘VIOLENT EXTREMISM’ OMITS ISLAM

The Daily Caller … January 12, 2015Obama Sides With Muslim Brotherhood In Islamic Reform Debate [VIDEO]

The Investigative Project On Terrorism … January 12, 2015IPT Shillman Fellow Pete Hoekstra: Western leaders refuse to address enduring threat from radical Islam

The Daily Caller … January 13, 2015White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles

Breitbart … January 9, 2015UN SECRETARY-GENERAL: FRENCH TERROR NOT ‘RELIGIOUS WAR’–JUST ‘CRIMINALITY’

Breitbart … January 9, 2015HOLLANDE: TERROR ATTACKS ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’, BUT ‘FANATICS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM’

Fox News … January 7, 2015Will we ever learn? Obama White House can’t admit Paris attacks ‘Islamic terrorism’

The Independent UK … December 31, 2014 ‘They have hatred in their hearts’: Angela Merkel delivers stinging attack on Germany’s growing anti-Islamic protesters


Breitbart … January 13, 2015

Breitbart … January 7, 2015
BLOOMBERG: DON’T JUDGE IMMIGRANTS BY CHARLIE HEBDO MASSACRE; 9/11 TERRORISTS WERE JUST ‘VISITORS’

The Blaze … January 13, 2015 Biased Media Demonize Police But Defend Islam

The Guardian … January 12, 2015David Cameron pledges anti-terror law for internet after Paris attacks
PM calls for new laws to break into terrorists’ communications but Nick Clegg warns of encroachment on civil liberties

Breitbart … January 14, 2015‘ISLAM IS PART OF GERMANY’: MERKEL JOINS MUSLIM RALLY IN BERLIN


New laws being implemented is one of the primary reasons for the Islamic incursions. As civil strife worsens still more laws will be enacted and directed at the native born citizens of western nations, while ignoring the behavior of the multicultural Muslims. In the grand scheme of things, Muslims have their purpose but it is not to rule. We’ll go there next.

Suggested Reading…Jews, Netanyahu, France, Islam, And The Agenda

Geert Wilders, Palm Beach, USA, speech Restoration Weekend, 15 Nov. 2014

Anarchy And Chaos Part One
Anarchy And Chaos Part Two
Anarchy And Chaos Part Three
Anarchy And Chaos Part Four
Anarchy And Chaos Part Five
Anarchy And Chaos Part Six
Anarchy And Chaos Part SevenAnarchy And Chaos Part Eight

 
_______________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Some of Danny’s photos are not included.
 
Some see, few know, many choose to wander aimlessly in a fog, devoid of sunlight. I seek the light of day and leave the others to their chosen realm of ignorance. They are the ones who have brought this great nation down. I write only for the benefit of those who possess the courage required to restore our birthright. – Danny Jeffrey
 
 
 

Don’t Sympathize with Antony Weiner’s Wife Too Much


Abedin family Radical Islamic Tree

There’s a Conspiracy there Some Where

 

John R. Houk

© August 15, 2013

 

The Clintons are an untrustworthy Leftist family that already has had the father/husband figure attain to the Office of President in the USA. The Clintons have a Teflon history of an unsubstantiated but Conspiracy Theory suspected list of having associates and those who may have known too much that might implicate the Clintons in some nefarious deaths.

 Huma Abedin, (left) shown with former Secretary of State and U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton. Abedin was an aide to Clinton beginning with an internship in the White House in 1996. She was Clinton's travelling chief-of-staff during Clinton's bid for the White House and deputy chief of staff while Clinton was Secretary of state. (Photo: © Reuters)

As I write this it is 2013. Unless President Barack Hussein Obama pulls off America’s first leadership coup there will be no incumbent running for President in 2016.  Just as in 2008 Hillary Clinton is seemingly emerging as the Dem Party favorite to run for President of the United Sates. Writer Danny Jeffrey suspects that even Conservative women will vote for Hillary to get the first woman elected as President. This is one time I pray that this is an inaccurate prediction. Danny’s prediction is sound though. After all I believe Independents swayed the 2008 election to get the first Black person elected as President. Obama had less qualifications to be President than Sarah Palin and she was a Vice-President Running Mate to the Republican candidate.

 

As 2016 approaches Hillary Clinton has the credentials to be President all be it a Leftist President. Hillary was an active First Lady for Slick Willie, a U.S. Senator and a Secretary of State. That is actually a résumé that candidates on either side of the political spectrum would love to possess.

 

Obama has shown the Leftist path has been a disastrous one for the USA. Unless voters and Congress receive a spine by the 2014 election cycle to impeach and convict Obama, America will be stuck with another three years of disastrous Obama Change.

 

Then the first Tuesday in November 2016 arrives and the Dems actually have a cunning credentialed but Leftist female candidate to entice voters with a female gender and a strong-willed personality. I know many Conservatives will disagree with me, but I would hope for Sarah Palin to be the strong-willed Conservative personality to confront the potential Dem candidate of Hillary Clinton.

 

Huma, Weiner & Diana West bylineNow here comes my Conspiracy Theory relating to Hillary Clinton. I speculate that the Anthony Weiner comedic Mayoral run in New York City is a Clinton ploy to garner more sympathy especially from female voters. You see, Weiner’s wife is Huma Abedin a long time upper-level staffer of Hillary Clinton. Huma Abedin comes from a Radical Muslim family AND she has been involved with Radical Muslim journalism prior to working for Hillary. That Radical Muslim connection is the Muslim Brotherhood which is the Radical Muslim power behind many Muslim-American organizations that lie about their moderation because their essence is Radical Islam.

 

Now the weird thing about Weiner is his religious background:

 

Video: IS ANTHONY WEINER (BORN) JEWISH?

 

In Jewish law Jewishness is passed down through the mother and so in the eyes of Jews, Hitler and Muslims (unless Weiner converts to Islam) Anthony Weiner is Jewish.

 

So how or maybe why did Weiner marry Radical Muslim Huma Abedin? Here is some speculative reasoning (denounced by the Left) on Weiner converting to Islam:

 

Video: Did Anthony Weiner Convert to Islam?

 

Related to the video above is some information from SpecialGuest.com focusing on ex-Muslim I.Q. al-Rassooli’s speculation on a possible Muslim conversion by Weiner.

 

There is another speculation that makes more sense to me and it has to do with the practice of deception-misdirection to further the agenda of Islam:

 

Saleha Abedin, Huma’s mother, a leader of the Muslim Sisterhood (Secret Muslim Brotherhood affiliate), did not have a problem with the marriage due to a tactic that Huma is employing. It’s called Muruna and it permits the lifting of all prohibitions in Islam if the objective is to further the cause of Islam itself.

 

Huma Mahmood Abedin Weiner is a practicing Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia, and that her mother is a Pakistani living in Jeddah. Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, is a leader in the Brotherhood’s secret women’s division — known as the Muslim Sisterhood or International Women’s Organization

 

 

All signs point to Huma using a technique championed by Qaradawi himself. It’s called Muruna and it allows Muslims to go to extreme lengths to deceive and convince non-Muslims they pose no threat. One such act permitted by Muruna would be for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man if it furthered the cause of Islam.

 

Perhaps the biggest red flag of all is why Huma – a practicing Muslim – wasn’t disowned by her family for marrying a Jew in the first place.

 

When it was learned that Saleha was a member of this extremely nefarious group, Walid was able to uncover mountains of evidence from news sources – in Arabic – that implicated Huma’s mother as being part of a plot reminiscent of Hitler’s Nazi Germany. Today, much of these connections have vanished. Short of identifying Saleha as the Dean of Dar el Hekma, her tracks have been all but covered. (READ ENTIRETYWalid Shoebat tells us why Huma Abedin, daughter of a Muslim Brotherhood member, would marry Anthony Weiner, a Jew; Bare Naked Islam; 7/4/12)

 

This is the logical explanation of how devout Islamist Huma Abedin married Jewish Anthony Weiner. It probably helped the Muslim approval of the Weiner-Abedin marriage using this concept of Muruna that Weiner is not a practicing Jew but rather one of the deceived Leftist Jews of America that are so secular that they are willing to throw Israel under the bus with the land for peace misconception.

 

Norma Zager on Left Wing American Jews:

 

Recently I had the unfortunate experience of meeting with a group of liberal Jews who believe Israel is some kind of evil occupying government and the poor Palestinian people (actually a figment of the Arab public relations propaganda machine) deserve to have Israel’s land.

 

 

Of course every Jewish person should be dedicated to ensuring it remains a viable Jewish State for so many reasons I would not have enough space to list them. However, when I hear the anger and rhetoric espoused by the liberals I realize what harm the American Jews are doing through this significant divide.

 

 

Giving land for peace has done nothing more than creating new demands for more land with far less peace. …

 

 

J Street and Peace Now have become a powerful voice and are firm in their resolve and anger toward Israel and their determination to ensure the Palestinians a state.

 

 

Each time the Jewish people argue amongst themselves, and each time a Jewish group maligns Israel, the extremists gain more strength. … (READ ENTIRETY [SlantRight.com archive site has a bandwidth limit. When the limit is exceeded one has to wait until the next cycle to read the archives] – Butting Out of Israel’s Business; By Norma Zager; SlantRight.com; 1/7/11)

 

Leftist American-Jews overwhelmingly vote for the Dem Party. They are so blinded by Leftist ideology they do not realize they are voting for a block within the Dems that is supportive of the Muslim Brotherhood and even has an infiltrator in Huma Abedin that is dedicated to the genocide of Jews in Israel.

 

Ryan Mauro writing at The Clarion Project does not go as far as I do to suggest there is a Conspiracy Theory behind Weiner’s NYC Mayoral run, Huma Abedin and the Clinton cabal; however he provides enough information that I believe one could draw my conclusions. Mauro even points out that Al Jazeera – the Islamist mouth piece of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood – is a donor to the Jewish Anthony Weiner. If indeed Hillary runs for President she will build on Obama’s anti-Israel course to the point that Israel may have to look elsewhere for a different ally to survive. Oh wait, global Antisemitism is again pervasive as in pre-WWII days. There is NO other powerful ally to protect the Jewish heritage to their own LAND.

 

JRH 8/15/13 (Hat Tip: Danny Jeffrey)

Please Support NCCR

******************************************

Extremism Found in Journal During Huma Abedin’s Tenure

 

By Ryan Mauro

August 12, 2013

The Clarion Project

 

If Huma Abedin is an anti-Islamist Muslim, then she must explain why she was the assistant editor of a radical Islamist journal.

 

Islam expert Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Jihad and Sharia, has discovered alarming extremism in an Islamist journal bearing the name of Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff and wife of New York City mayoral candidate, former Rep. Anthony Weiner.

 

The Clarion Project helped bring attention to the Islamist ties of Abedin in July 2012, specifically her family’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and her position as an assistant editor of the Islamist journal from 1996 to 2008. More recently, we’ve covered the donations from an Al-Jazeera lobbyist to the mayoral campaign of her husband, former Rep. Anthony Weiner.

 

The publication in question is the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. Originally known as the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs Journal from 1979 when it began to 1995. The Institute was founded by Abedin’s late father and two Islamist colleagues that led the Muslim World League and World Assembly of Muslim Youth, two powerful engines of Wahhabism.

 

Abedin was the assistant editor of the journal for at least a dozen years, from 1996 (the year she began working as an intern at the White House) to 2008. She worked alongside several family members on the publication, including her mother, brother and sister.

 

Her mother, Saleha, has an especially strong Islamist resume, though the overlaps in the Islamist infrastructure can make it confusing. In short, Abedin’s mother is a member of the female counterpart of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Muslim World League. She leads a group called the International Islamic Committee for Women and Child, a subsidiary of a Muslim Brotherhood-led group that is banned in Israel for its links to Hamas.

 

In 1999, the Abedin family journal and Saleha Abedin’s group published a book in Arabic titled “Women in Islam.” This was three years after Huma Abedin joined the journal.

 

The book teaches that man-made law is inherently oppressive towards women, while Sharia law is liberating. According to the text, Muslim women have an obligation to contribute to jihad; apostates are to be put to death; freedom of speech should be conformed to the boundaries set by Sharia and wives must have sex with their husbands on command.

 

The Center for Security Policy has published a 28-page analysis of the book. Page three of the Center for Security Policy analysis states that the organization led by Huma Abedin’s mother “advocates for the repeal of Mubarak-era prohibitions on female genital mutilation, child marriage and marital rape, on the grounds that such prohibitions run counter to Islamic law, which allows for their practice.”

 

Dr. Andrew Bostom found an issue of the family journal from 2000 that states on page 125 that non-Muslims should give up resisting Sharia governance and join Muslims in fighting secularism. It even states that this resistance to Sharia is nearly an act of treason.

 

“In the name of peaceful co-existence and religious harmony, non-Muslims should stop opposing the application of shari’ah by and for the Muslims … Moreover, the Ahl al-Kitab [Christians and Jews] should eschew all acts bordering on treasonable felony but cooperate with Muslims and, as scripturalists, should not support secularism.”

 

And what is the consequence of treason? Look at an issue from 2011 after Huma Abedin left. It explicitly states that treason qualifies as a crime with a specific sharia-proscribed punishment. Left unsaid is that this punishment is death. The other offenses in this category are adultery, defamation of character, alcoholism, theft, apostasy and oppression.

 

This post-Huma issue explicitly states that the criminal justice system of sharia is to be implemented because it prevents chaos and vigilantism. “The Shariah penal code is best. People in societies where the Shariah is not operative have lost total confidence in the penal code of the existing laws, and hence they may resort to what one may call ‘jungle justice,’” it states.

 

The Abedin family journal reiterated that those that fight against the Islamist agenda deserve death in an issue in 2004, Huma’s eighth year at the publication. According to Bostom, page 167 states a summary of Abul Ala Maududi’s position as follows:

 

“Waging war with the Creator and His Apostle is serious for it amounts to a clear rebellion against the Islamic State where the principles of equity, justice and respect for all are established. So anyone who disturbs or attempts to disturb that system of life is an outlaw who deserves capital punishment. Abul-A’la Maududi explains that it does not make any difference whether that mischief is created by criminals or murderers who cause disorder in the settled and peaceful society, or by armed forces who attempt to overthrow an Islamic State and establish some corrupt un-Islamic system instead.”

 

Maududi is the founder of the Pakistani Islamist group, Jamaat-e-Islami. The Abedin family journal teaches that this radical thinker is a foremost authority and his words are to be followed today.

 

If Huma Abedin is an anti-Islamist Muslim, then she must explain how she reconciled her involvement with an Islamist journal. More importantly, the U.S. government must explain whether any of this was taken into account when granting her a top-secret security clearance.

________________________

Don’t Sympathize with Antony Weiner’s Wife Too Much

John R. Houk

© August 15, 2013

__________________________

Extremism Found in Journal During Huma Abedin’s Tenure

 

Ryan Mauro is the ClarionProject.org’s National Security Analyst, a fellow with the Clarion Project and is frequently interviewed on Fox News.

 

Copyright © 2013 Clarion Project, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Sinister Beyond Belief


Leftist Sgt Schultz Immitation

Understand Photo: Watch Hogan’s Heroes – Vintage TV

 

Intro to Sinister Beyond Belief by Justin Smith

John R. Houk

© May 23, 2013

 

Justin Smith writes about the IRS Scandal and how the Democrats and the Obama Administration has used the IRS as a political tool to harass and disenfranchise Conservatives that have a more traditional and Constitutional Originalist view of America’s future path. Obama’s Administration has exacted oppression on American citizens that the President’s “Change” Agenda as an evil Socialist-Marxist alternative to the values of the Founding Fathers which believed the nascent American culture had a Christian Moral Foundation. YES, even the Founding Fathers that Leftists claim were anti-Christian Deists promoted Christian Morality as the foundation a good rule of law and government.

 

Here is a bit of a spoiler alert. Justin concludes his essay by blaming the 16th Amendment as the blame for the Federal Government to use the IRS as a political tool to enforce Presidential Administrations’ political agenda against their enemies. It is the 16th Amendment that enabled the Federal Government to establish a direct income tax levied according to the whim of Congress. Hence there is now a complicated unwieldy arm of government to force a percentage of American wage earners’ fruit of labor.

 

This is the 16th Amendment as ratified into law in the year 1913:

 

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

 

Here is a centrist view of the 16th Amendment that led its author to believe a Federal Income Tax could have existed without it; however that Income Tax would have to be levied in a less restrictive and oppressive way than the present Income Tax:

 

Many Unhappy Returns—Millions of Them

 

The above article provides an excellent history on how the 16th Amendment came into existence including the fact that the amendment’s ratification result of a political compromise in which its passage in both Houses of Congress was considered doubtful let alone the ratification of the then 36 required States to affirm. Below is an essay from The Patriot Post on the 16th Amendment passage yet with a more Conservative and Originalist view.

 

On the Sixteenth Amendment

 

The essence of The Patriot Post essay is the only way to reform income taxation as exacted by the IRS is by amending the 16th Amendment to restore the efficacy of the Constitution’s Article 1 Section 9:

 

The Constitution afforded citizens this protection in Article I, Section 9, which reads, in part, “No Capitation, or other direct Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.” (Excerpted from above essay)

 

In my opinion repealing the 16th Amendment would better be served with an Amendment that is specific on government limitations on collect taxes from Americans whether it be a Consumption Tax (i.e. Sales Tax of some sort) and/or Income Tax (on however defined whether graduated, flat or whatever income formula).

 

JRH 5/23/13

Please Support NCCR

************************

Sinister Beyond Belief

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 5/22/2013 10:43 AM

 

The line separating good and evil passes not through states nor between political parties either, but straight through the human heart. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

One must wonder if they are still living in America, when all Americans are witnessing yet another Obama administration scandal, as this administration has been caught using the IRS as a hammer and sickle against its political opponents in the most egregious and despicable abuse of power in decades. This is the very same crime that was described in Article I of the impeachment brief against President Richard Nixon. If nothing else, the recent revelations from a newly motivated (angry) press corps and testimony before the Congressional Ways and Means Committee regarding this matter will hopefully be the first steps in stopping this out-of-control ideologue/despot Obama, for whom republicanism and the rule of law means nothing!

In some limited scope, Lyndon Johnson, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton also used the IRS against opponents, but they never used it in the broad manner in which the Obama administration has attacked Tea Party and grass roots liberty focused groups. By hampering the ability of these groups to exist as non-profit organizations, Tea Party and other patriotic conservative groups also had their effectiveness and reach into the communities damaged and dampened. Some groups had been blocked for as long as 27 months, while Progressive sounding names and Progressive groups received their tax-exempt status, in some cases, in as little as nine weeks… and this surely had some marked bearing on the 2012 election!

By June 4, 2012, the Inspector General had started a review and an audit of the IRS’s practice of targeting conservatives, which is the primary reason that Lois Lerner, IRS division head on tax-exempt organizations, broke the story in advance of the I.G.’s report. Ms Lerner knew conservatives were being targeted as early as 2010. This practice was not limited to just “two rogue IRS employees” in Cincinnati, since complaints, challenges and lawsuits started coming in from California to New York and even DC. If, as Obama asserts, Obama knew nothing of this until recently, he is either completely incompetent or a liar… I suspect the latter.

Steve Miller, acting IRS commissioner, knew about this matter in March 2012, as did Doug Schulman, the former IRS commissioner. It is inconceivable that all these IRS officials were aware of this IRS policy and that Obama and his staff were not. By sitting on this information, not only are Obama and his staff guilty of obstruction of justice, they are guilty to some degree of any crime that the investigation uncovers, whether they initiated this policy or not.

No fewer than 471 groups were targeted… groups such as Friends of the Constitution, the Coalition for a Conservative Majority and numerous Tea Party chapters, as well as Koch Industries, Karl Rove, Franklin Graham (Rev Billy Graham’s son) and James Dobson from Focus on the Family.

Regarding the National Organization for Marriage, which is led by constitutional law professor John Eastman, information was released to the co-chairman of the Re-elect Obama campaign that showed NOM’s confidential Schedule B tax return section; this information was passed to the Human Rights campaign, a NOM opponent, who published it in March 2012. This is a felony punishable by 5 years in prison and a $5000 fine, and although Mr. Eastman has long since filed a freedom of information and investigation status request, to date the I.G and the IRS have not identified the people responsible.

Some groups have told Representative Darrell Issa that the IRS was seeking lists of donors and many documents. The Clear Lake Tea Party in Texas was asked 19 additional questions, along with requests for a list of speakers, resumes for each board member, a list of questions posed to potential political candidates by the group and a list of who was invited to those events.

During the recent hearings before the Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) asked Steve Miller, “Is it illegal, this targeting of groups?” And showing his true statist/Leftist Red colors, Miller answered, “It absolutely is not.”

The lies are flying from Lerner, Miller and Shulman, as highlighted by both Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), while Obama is making Steve Miller the fall guy. But in reality, Miller had very little to do with this policy and he was set to leave in June anyway, so his “forced” resignation amounts to a meaningless effort from the administration and an insignificant act. And, in the meantime, one of the real culprits, Sarah Hall Ingram, is not being held accountable for her criminal acts, since she governed the IRS tax-exempt section for groups between 2009 and 2012; now she has been promoted to head the IRS Affordable Health Care section and 16,000 new employees!

If the IRS can halt someone’s tax-exempt status, they can just as easily intimidate that person with the IRS new controls over health care. Imagine being threatened with financial penalties, your information being shared with political enemies, or depending on the IRS for life and death decisions for yourself or your family members. Imagine that stints are outlawed for anyone over 65 years old; with the Progressive’s post-Constitution mindset; it is not a leap of logic to understand that Leftists will receive such care, no matter their age, and conservatives will not.

Attorney General Eric Holder stated on May 15 that “False-statement violations have been made give, at least what I know at this point,” and the Justice Department will be investigating whether anyone’s civil rights had been violated; however, it is troubling to hear him say, “The FBI is coordinating with the Justice Dept to see IF (my emphasis) any laws were broken in connection with those matters related to the IRS,” when obviously laws were broken. Between Jack Lew, Secretary of Treasury and Obama’s political hack, and Holder’s well documented propensity and proclivity to prejudice and selectively enforce laws depending on the Democrat Party’s agenda and Obama’s whims, there must be an outcry from all Americans for a select independent investigative team, an independent lead investigator and Counsel and a Special Prosecutor!

The targeting of conservatives by the IRS was certainly centrally directed by high level officials within the IRS and quite likely White House staff members and President Obama himself. If they are allowed to get away with this, we have passed from a constitutional government to an authoritarian and illegitimate government.

With way too much untethered power, the IRS has become a Left-wing political operation, as seen through these attacks on conservative groups in order to ensure Obama’s re-election. And this is only one piece in a long pattern of anti-American and unConstitutional conduct from this administration, which has increasingly used its power to intimidate and attack those who oppose its policies. Why is the IRS so fixated on acquiring the names of people whose only “crime” is opposing the Obama administration? Ideology is their weapon and a defense mechanism against information, and it is also their pretext for eluding moral constraints in doing and approving evil, while they tell themselves, “My conscience is clean”. This is sinister beyond belief, and it makes the case for repealing the 16th Amendment and passing a flat tax, as we also cut the IRS to the bare-boned minimal existence; this is absolutely an illegal overreach of government and an absolute outrage for all America: Obama must be impeached!

 

By Justin O. Smith

_______________________

Intro to Sinister Beyond Belief by Justin Smith

John R. Houk

© May 23, 2013

____________________

Sinister Beyond Belief

 

© Justin O. Smith

Edited by John R. Houk