A Beginner’s Guide To American Communist Parties: Part 2


???????????

On January 25th I cross posted Trevor Loudon’s part one exposé of Communist infiltration in America. A Communism dedicated to the destruction of the Founding Fathers’ vision of an American Republic sealed by a Constitution insuring representative government by WE THE PEOPLE under the providence of nature’s Judeo-Christian Creator. Below is part two.

 

Here is an excerpt that should inspire you as an American Patriot, to read the entire article:

 

The Nature of Communist Organizations

 

Keep in mind that leftist groups often overlap, morph, and split. Like their principles, these groups are forever changing, which adds to the complexity in researching them. One thing that does not change, however, is the goal of all these organizations: global communism, which they believe can only be achieved through revolution.

 

 

No matter how this revolution is achieved, the United States is the biggest obstacle in their path. Once the United States succumbs to communism, these activists believe they will be directly overseeing a new world order.

 

JRH 2/1/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

*********************

A Beginner’s Guide To American Communist Parties: Part 2

 

By Trevor Loudon  

Originally posted: The Epoch Times

January 25, 2019 8:52 am

Noisy Room

 

A Socialist Party supporter holds a protest sign at a rally to urge Congress to vote against a limited military strike. Photo by David McNew/Getty Images.

 

Part Two of this article addresses American communist groups who organize outside of the Democratic Party, unlike their Democrat Party-friendly counterparts, who were discussed in Part One.

 

Broadly speaking, there are two categories of hard-left organizations in America: those who organize within the Democrat Party and those who do not. Those who generally stay away from the Democratic Party encompass dedicated ideologues who are more likely to engage in street violence and—like their Democrat-friendly counterparts — work with foreign communist regimes and groups.

 

While hardened communists represent a small fraction of the population, they have a surprisingly powerful impact but receive little scrutiny from the establishment media. The Revolutionary Communist Party’s flag-burning activities, for example, resulted in a Supreme Court decision that continues to reverberate.

 

The Revolutionary Communist Party’s front group, Refuse Fascism, placed a full-page ad in the New York Times that was signed by former Weather Underground terrorist, communist, and former President Barack Obama’s friend Bill Ayers; professor of theology and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Cornel West; and militant anti-Israel activist Marc Lamont Hill, to name a few.

 

The hardcore Marxist Workers World Party was behind the headline-grabbing push to demolish confederate-era statues. The Freedom Road Socialist Organization/FightBack! fought to keep terrorist murderer Rasmea Odeh in the United States.

 

Communists of all stripes descended upon Ferguson, Missouri, in the wake of the shooting of Michael Brown; they were behind the Standing Rock standoff over the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota; they flooded to the border to support the Honduras Caravan at the end of 2018; they descended upon Charlottesville in August 2017 to protest the so-called “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally; and they were behind numerous violent anti-Trump protests in 2016 and 2017.

 

Communists agitate their way into headlines on a regular basis; yet many Americans believe communists somehow evaporated when the Berlin Wall came tumbling down in 1989.

 

This two-part series offers a birds-eye view of the U.S.-based organizations, and hopefully plants the seed for readers to understand that these subversive organizations exist, and they seek to hurt America.

 

Socialist Party USA (SPUSA)

 

In the early 20th century, the Socialist Party USA (SPUSA) was the largest Marxist group on the U.S. left with 100,000 members boasting numerous elected officials, mainly in the Midwest. The SPUSA lost many members to the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) in the 1920s, and much of the remaining remnant to the Democratic Socialists Organizing Committee in the 1970s.

 

Today’s SPUSA overlaps with the Green Party in some areas, with the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) in Memphis, Tennessee, and with Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) nationally.

 

In Memphis, the SPUSA controls the Mid-South Peace and Justice Center and does interact with some local Democrats such as Congressmember Steve Cohen (D-TN).

 

The SPUSA is probably under a thousand members in total, but has a presence in almost every state.

 

The party is extremely militant, and is effective in some areas on local issues, but is ultimately a fringe player on the U.S. left.

 

Socialist Workers Party (SWP)

 

In the 1970s, the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) was a leading force in the anti-Vietnam War movement. Its newspaper The Militant was widely read on the U.S. left. The SWP began as a pro-Leon Trotsky split from the CPUSA in the 1920s, and for many years was the country’s second-largest communist party. Currently, the SWP is a shadow of its former self.

 

The SWP abandoned Trotskyism in the 1980s, and now orientates its international activities around Cuba and the old Soviet front the World Federation of Democratic Youth. The SWP has tiny sister groups in Canada, Iceland, the UK, New Zealand, and Australia.

 

In the United States, the SWP is now little more than a Marxist cult. Their tactic is to recruit bright young college students then put them to work for decades in meat-packing plants in Iowa or Nebraska to connect with the “working class.” This talent-wasting exercise has been applied since the 1970s with minimal results.

 

But they keep trying.

 

The once-dynamic SWP retains maybe 500 members nationwide.

 

Freedom Socialist Party (FSP)

 

The Freedom Socialist Party (FSP) began in 1966 as a split from the SWP in Seattle. It is militantly feminist, “anti-racist,” and pro-Cuba. Today, the FSP has branches in Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, and Melbourne, Australia. It probably has under 200 members in total.

 

The FSP is big on “abortion clinic defense,” usually through their front-group Radical Women.

 

Workers World Party (WWP)

 

The Workers World Party (WWP) is one of the most hardcore Marxist organizations of any consequence in the United States. It was founded in 1959 as a pro-China split from the SWP. Its newspaper, the Workers World’s banner line is “Workers and Oppressed Peoples of the World Unite.”

 

They incorporate elements of Stalin, Mao, and Trotsky into their revolutionary philosophy.

 

The WWP is a serious communist party, very active in street protests and often prone to violence. When you see Confederate statues being toppled in North Carolina or Louisiana—that’s the WWP.

 

The WWP has close ties to Russia, North Korea, and Cuba. These people are one the most dangerous communist parties in the country.

 

The WWP has 400–600 members in about 30 branches, mainly in New York, Boston, Chicago, and the West Coast.

 

The WWP runs its own candidates, but the Durham, North Carolina, branch does work with Democrats.

 

In 2018, the WWP’s very strong Detroit branch split from the organization to form a new group, the Communist Workers League.

 

Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL)

 

The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) was originally created in 2006, as the result of a split in the WWP, although their “political line” is almost identical. The San Francisco branch as well as several other members left the WWP in 2004. The PSL has since established two national branches in Washington, D.C. and in San Francisco, as well as more than 20 smaller branches throughout the United States, from Sarasota, Florida, to West Virginia to Portland, Oregon.

 

The PSL is a dynamic and growing party but suffers a high burnout rate of cadre. It is probably 500 to 800 members strong.

 

The PSL is very close to Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Cuba, even the ruling Communist Party of Nepal. PSL leader Brian Becker is a regular on Russian Propaganda channel Russia Today (RT) and has his own show on Russian channel Sputnik.

 

These people are serious communists.

 

Becker and the PSL have ties to several Muslim groups, including the Nation of Islam and the pro-Hamas Muslim American Society.

 

The PSL controls the nationwide anti-U.S. military organization the ANSWER Coalition.

 

Freedom Road Socialist Organization-FightBack! (FRSO-FB)

 

The FRSO-FB split from the Freedom Road Socialist Organization in 1998 but kept the same name. FRSO-FB is centered in Chicago, Minneapolis, and Wisconsin, with some strength in New York, North Carolina, northern Florida, eastern Texas, Arizona, Utah, and California. It’s probably around 500 members strong, more if you count its youth wing, Students for a Democratic Society.

 

The FRSO-FB is hard-core Maoist. It supports China, and three officially designated terrorist organizations: the Communist Party of the Philippines, Colombia’s FARC guerrillas, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Because of these connections, the FBI raided the homes of several FRSO-FB members in September 2010 and issued subpoenas, searching for evidence related to material support of terrorist groups. No charges were ever made.

 

FRSO-FB works closely with the WWP and together have built ties to some pro-Putin elements in Russia. The FRSO-FB also has close ties to Venezuela.

 

Solidarity

 

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, Solidarity is feminist, green, and socialist. Originally formed by ex-SWP members in 1986, Solidarity is affiliated to the Fourth International, a worldwide alliance of Trotskyist parties. Only about 200 members strong, Solidarity has most presence in New York City and California.

 

Solidarity comrades mainly support the Green Party and have some overlap with the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (not the FightBack! group) and with the DSA.

 

League of Revolutionaries for a New America (LRNA)

 

League of Revolutionaries for a New America (LRNA) morphed out of the old Communist Labor Party (CLP), a Maoist grouping that originated out of a pro-China split in the CPUSA in 1958. The early CLP was predominately black and Puerto Rican, and today’s LRNA is largely comprised of “people of color.” The LRNA is extremely secretive about membership, which probably stands at about 300.

 

People’s Tribune was the newspaper of the LRNA, with Rally Comrades! now its official publication. Its best-known affiliate now is probably Caleb Maupin, a convert from the WWP. He is a regular guest on RT and a correspondent for Iran’s PressTV.

 

International Socialist Organization (ISO)

 

Founded in 1977, the International Socialist Organization (ISO) is now America’s largest Trotskyist organization. It was aligned for years with the British Socialist Workers Party, but now has relations with several foreign Trotskyist groupings in Canada, Australia, and Europe. The ISO has 1,500 to 2,000 members and is present in most northern and western U.S. cities and Texas.

 

The ISO is very active on campuses and in the anti-war movement. It works with and inside the Green Party. Many ISO leaders have stood for office on the Green ticket, especially in California.

 

The ISO publishes a daily online and monthly print newspaper, Socialist Worker. ISO also distributes the International Socialist Review and titles from the publishing house Haymarket Books, both of which are run by the non-profit Center for Economic Research and Social Change.

 

Every year, the ISO hosts a well-attended “Socialism” conference in Chicago.

 

Socialist Alternative (SA)

 

Socialist Alternative (SA) is in political solidarity with the Committee for a Workers’ International, a worldwide Trotskyist alliance working in more than 30 countries. SA is the second largest U.S. Trotskyist grouping after ISO, with probably 600 to 800 members active in most states.

 

SA first emerged as “Labor Militant” in 1986, inspired by the example of the UK socialist group Militant Tendency, which sought to infiltrate the British Labour Party. SA advocates for electoral opposition to the Democratic Party and concentrates on running its own candidates. After many electoral campaigns—often on the Green Party ticket—SA’s biggest success to date was electing their comrade Kshama Sawant to Seattle City Council in 2013.

 

Party of Communists, USA (PCUSA)

 

The Party of Communists, USA (PCUSA) split from the CPUSA in 2014, mainly because they thought their party was becoming indistinguishable from the Democratic Party.

 

Though probably under 200 members, the diehard Stalinist PCUSA sees itself as the true leader of American communism and has reached out to more “mainstream” communist parties in Mexico, Cuba, Europe, Russia, and Canada.

 

The PCUSA is strongest in Los Angeles and New York City, where it has some influence in the Transit Workers Union. The PCUSA publishes a magazine, Ideological Fightback!, and runs a front group the U.S. Friends of the Soviet People.

 

Revolutionary Communist Party (Revcom)

 

Revolutionary Communist Party (Revcom) is the cultiest group on the U.S. left. These people worship their great leader Bob Avakian and hang on his every word.

 

Revcom has roots in the Maoist student movement of the Vietnam War era of the 1960s and 1970s. They have active chapters in at least 15 population centers, mainly centered around their Revolution bookshops. Once boasting several thousand members, Revcom today is probably around 500 to 800 members, centered largely in Chicago and the Bay Area.

 

Revcom supports only the most extreme foreign Maoists, such as Peru’s notorious Sendero Luminoso guerrillas.

 

Revcom leaders believe “elections are not the arena where decisions are made about the future direction of the society” and do not participate in them.

 

Their magazine/newsletter Revolution is published weekly in print and online. The Antifa-like “Refuse Fascism” protest group is a front group for Revcom.

 

Revcom’s trademark is burning U.S. flags. If you see black-tee-shirt-clad protesters gleefully immolating Old Glory it’s almost certainly Revcom.

 

The Nature of Communist Organizations

 

Keep in mind that leftist groups often overlap, morph, and split. Like their principles, these groups are forever changing, which adds to the complexity in researching them. One thing that does not change, however, is the goal of all these organizations: global communism, which they believe can only be achieved through revolution.

 

The biggest debate within leftist groups is how to best achieve “Revolution.” Is it through the constant chaos of violent protest, as advised by Leon Trotsky? Is it through the “march through the institutions” as directed by Antonio Gramsci? Or perhaps through race-baiting tactics, turning people against one another, as preferred by Mao Zedong?

 

No matter how this revolution is achieved, the United States is the biggest obstacle in their path. Once the United States succumbs to communism, these activists believe they will be directly overseeing a new world order.

______________________

Trevor Loudon is an author, filmmaker and public speaker from New Zealand. For more than 30 years, he has researched radical left, Marxist and terrorist movements and their covert influence on mainstream politics.

 

© 2019 NoisyRoom.net

 

A Beginner’s Guide To American Communist Parties: Part 1


The ideology of Communism has always been a threat to the Founding Fathers’ vision of a Republic accountable to WE THE PEOPLE, Liberty, and Biblical Moral principles forming the backbone to make America good (of interest on a Biblically moral America: HERE and HERE). With that in  mind Noisy Room is posting Trevor Loudon’s exposé on contemporary Communism in the Democratic Party today.

 

JRH 1/25/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

********************

A Beginner’s Guide To American Communist Parties: Part 1

 

By Trevor Loudon

Originally posted: The Epoch Times

January 24, 2019

Noisy Room

 

US Democratic Representative from New York Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (L) speaks with Democratic Representative from Michigan Rashida Tlaib at the Capitol in Washington, DC, on January 16, 2019. Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

 

It’s been this author’s experience that most American journalists, politicians, police officers, and even intelligence officers have minimal understanding of America’s contemporary communist movement.

 

The average American voter, naturally, has very few outlets available that acknowledge the continued existence and influence of contemporary communism. Yet, communism is currently the single most important political and cultural influence in the country. Therefore, thumbnail sketches are provided here that outline the more significant domestic communist organizations currently working to undermine the Constitution and impose socialism on the American people.

 

A word on communism versus socialism: Socialism is a euphemism for communism. They are two peas in the same pod and all lead to tyranny. Communism is socialism, and those who want you to believe otherwise are attempting to indoctrinate you. Period.

 

There are two American “lefts”: Communists willing to work with and inside the Democratic Party to achieve their goals; and communists who regard the Democrats as a hopelessly “bourgeois” “capitalist” party.

 

The first group are more organized, realistic, and dangerous. The second group, like the first, often work with foreign communists and are more likely to engage in street-level violence.

 

Part 1 of this article will deal with the communists who work with the Democratic party, as a matter of policy. These organizations are the most subversive and dangerous in America.

 

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)

 

Despite their public regular protestations, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is a communist organization. Many of their 55,000+ members are indoctrinated college students, but most of their leaders are hard-core Marxist revolutionaries.

 

Currently the United States’ largest Marxist organization, the DSA was formed in 1982 out of two similar groups. The larger was the “Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee” that mainly consisted of older activists from the rapidly imploding Socialist Party USA. The smaller was the “New American Movement” that consisted of young Vietnam War-era “Students for a Democratic Society” members and a group of older radicals who split from the Communist Party after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.

 

The most enduring influence in the DSA is Antonio Gramsci. An Italian communist theoretician, Gramsci believed in promoting socialism through patient infiltration of all political and cultural institutions before resorting to revolutionary violence.

 

Americans of all political persuasions may be surprised to learn that the DSA was initially very influential in the Democratic Party. The DSA helped establish the Congressional Progressive Caucus in 1991 with long-time ally Bernie Sanders and was successful in electing hundreds of Democratic Party officials, many local politicians, and several congressmembers.

 

Currently serving Congress members Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Danny Davis (D-IL), and Jerry Nadler (D-NY) have all been dues-paying DSA comrades at some point. In the last election, the DSA elected more than 20 local and state officials and two additional Congress members, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

 

DSA influence waned through the early 2000s and by 2015, the organization was down to about 6,000 members, only about a third of whom were active.

 

Bernie Sanders changed all that. The DSA has backed Sanders since at least 1990. When he ran for president, the DSA became the backbone of his team. As Sanders took off, so did the DSA. When President Donald Trump got elected, DSA membership exploded, and is only now starting to slow, and in some places reverse.

 

The DSA now has more than 200 chapters in all 50 states. DSA strongholds are Boston, New York, Washington, DC, Chicago, Detroit, Seattle, Portland, Oregon, the Bay Area, and Southern California, but almost every significant city in America — and many small towns — now have DSA chapters. New York City’s DSA branch boasts more than 3,000 dues-paying members; Austin, Texas, claims 700, and Portland, Oregon, has 800. These numbers have given the DSA huge ability to penetrate the Democratic Party in almost every state.

 

The DSA also controls an organization that gives backing to hard-left candidates called “Our Revolution,” which boasts 100,000 members working vigilantly to carry on the Sanders movement. Our Revolution’s door-knockers and phone bankers give the DSA the ability to elect comrades to Democratic committees and leadership posts all over the country. In July 2018, the Washington Post reported that the DSA “has never had more adherents or more clout.”

 

The DSA has a Religious Commission featuring many pastors, church officials, theologians, and religious academics vigilantly indoctrinating malleable minds that Christianity and socialism go hand-in-hand.

 

The DSA is also huge in the colleges. In the early days, nearly a third of DSA members were academics. Today, the youth-wing of the DSA is known as the YDSA and is featured on campuses across America.

 

For most of its existence, the DSA was formally affiliated with the Socialist International (SI), an alliance of more than 100 socialist and social democratic political parties. At their annual conference in Chicago in 2017, the DSA officially pulled out of the SI based on them being too moderate, allying instead with several European communist-oriented parties. The DSA is particularly close to Die Linke (The Left), which is the direct ancestor of the old Stalinist East German Communist Party.

 

In the 1980s, the DSA worked closely with Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, who eventually became the socialist president of Brazil. “Lula” then worked with Cuban president Fidel Castro to elect socialist governments across most of Latin America, known broadly as the “Red Tide.”

 

Prominent DSA members have included theologian professor Cornel West; the late father of the socialized healthcare movement and former Obama family doctor Quentin Young; Obama immigration adviser Eliseo Medina; actor Ed Asner; feminist Gloria Steinem; Muslim activist Linda Sarsour; and convicted East German spy Kurt Stand.

 

Communist Party USA (CPUSA)

 

The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) was started in 1919 in Chicago, where it is headquartered today. In the 1940s, the CPUSA had over 100,000 members. With only 5,000 comrades, the CPUSA is not as large as it once was, but is still a political force with clout.

 

While the CPUSA has comrades in every state, it’s strongest in Boston, New York, Connecticut, Philadelphia, Missouri, Chicago, Detroit, Northern and Central Texas, Arizona, and California. The party has considerable influence in organizations such as the Coalition of Black Trade Unionists, the U.S. Peace Council, Jobs with Justice, Alliance for Retired Americans, and dozens of smaller local front groups. The CPUSA is very active in the labor, environmental, and the “racial justice” movements. The CPUSA has systemically worked to recruit black pastors to cement their influence over the Democratic-voting black population.

 

The Democratic Party has long-since stopped expelling communists from their ranks. Consequently, in some parts of the country—Connecticut; West and South Chicago; Northeast Ohio; St. Louis, Missouri; Tucson, Arizona; Houston, Texas — the CPUSA controls some Democratic precincts.

 

In Connecticut, the CPUSA has relationships with the governor, both senators, all five Congress members, and multiple state, county, and city elected officials. In Texas, one CPUSA member, Sema Hernandez, ran on the Democratic ticket for the U.S. Senate and got 250,000 votes.

 

For decades, the CPUSA was a wholly-owned and subsidized Moscow franchise. Today, the CPUSA owes allegiance to China, but also maintains close ties to the communist parties of Russia, Vietnam, Cuba, Great Britain, Greece, Iran, Iraq, Mexico, Canada, and Brazil.

 

The party still participates in all the still-existing Soviet-era international communist front organizations: World Peace Council, World Federation of Trade Unions, Women’s International Democratic Federation, and the World Federation of Democratic Youth (WFDY). In 2017, the CPUSA sent a youth delegation to a WFDY festival in Sochi, Russia, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Russian President Vladimir Putin personally secured the venue and then addressed the estimated 30,000 attendees.

 

Prominent modern CPUSA members include Party Chairman John Bachtell (once the precinct captain for then-Senate candidate Barack Obama), Judith LeBlanc, a Native-American activist who trained the protesters at the 2015 Dakota Access Pipeline stand-off, and perennial Cleveland Democratic Party candidate Rick Nagin.

 

The CPUSA also has some cross-membership with the DSA.

 

Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS)

 

The CCDS began in 1991 when approximately one-third of the CPUSA’s then 3,000 members split from the party to form a new organization. The ex-communists were quickly joined by dissident Maoists, Trotskyists, anarchists, and “democratic socialists.”

 

In 2000, the Committees of Correspondence (CoC or CofC) became the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS).

 

The organization quickly grew to 2,000 members and was poised to become what the DSA is today — a mass-based, multi-tendency socialist organization. However, in recent years the CCDS has dwindled to about 400 mainly older members.

 

The CCDS is headquartered in the Bay Area, and is strongest in Chicago, New York, Boston, Western Pennsylvania, Louisville, Kentucky, the Carolinas, and Mississippi. The organization has some electoral influence through its close work with the DSA.

 

Prominent members include Mississippi Democratic State Rep. Kathy Sykes and South Carolina labor leader Donna Dewitt. Iconic communist Angela Davis and folk musician Pete Seeger were early members, as was current California Congresswoman Barbara Lee.

 

The CCDS very strongly supports China and Vietnam, as well as Cuba and Venezuela.

 

The CCDS has some cross-membership with both the DSA and CPUSA.

 

Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO)/LeftRoots

 

The Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) grew out of the Maoist student movements of the 1960s, ’70s and early ’80s.

 

Formed in 1985, the FRSO drew together the Proletarian Unity League and the Revolutionary Workers Headquarters, and later the Organization for Revolutionary Unity, Amilcar Cabral-Paul Robeson Collective, and the Socialist Organizing Network. In 2000, the anarchist group Fire by Night joined. The FRSO also picked up members from the long-defunct Communist Workers’ Party, League of Revolutionary Struggle, Line of March, and Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist).

 

In 1999, the FRSO split in large part over the main faction’s willingness to work with the Democratic Party. The group that broke away — the Freedom Road Socialist Organization/Fight Back! division will be covered in part 2 of this series.

 

The FRSO doesn’t openly affiliate with China any longer, but many members work or live in China, or do solidarity work with Chinese organizations. Some members also work with pro-North Korean groups, or support Cuba, Venezuela, officially designated terrorist groups, the Communist Party of the Philippines, or the popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

 

The FRSO is extremely secretive about membership, but this author estimates that it has 2,000 to 3,000 active members. The FRSO is concentrated in the Bay Area and New York City, with significant centers in Los Angeles; Portland, Oregon; Seattle; Boston; Philadelphia; Ohio; Missouri; Tennessee; North Carolina; Atlanta, Georgia; Austin, Texas; New Orleans; Southern Florida; and New Mexico.

 

The FRSO has some cross-membership with the DSA and CCDS.

 

Like all Maoist-derived groups, the FRSO delves heavily into racial and gender politics. The organization is comprised predominantly of “people of color,” at least 50 percent female, heavily gay, and comparatively young.

 

Black Lives Matter and the Marxist concept of “white privilege” comes from the FRSO orbit, along with the leftist fetish for using gender “neutral” pronouns.

 

Unlike most older Maoist groups, the FRSO is actively involved in electoral politics. The FRSO controls several voter registration/electoral front groups including the New Virginia Majority, the New Florida MajorityMemphis For All and Stand Up Nashville (both Tennessee), Durham For All (North Carolina), Lancaster Stands Up, and 215 People’s Alliance (both Pennsylvania), which have been pivotal in the elections of many local and national politicians.

 

The FRSO has deliberately targeted Southern states and areas with high black and Latino populations.

 

The FRSO also runs a plethora of well-funded front groups around the country including the Chinese Progressive Association (San Francisco), Chinese Progressive Association (Boston), Highlander Research and Education Center (Tennessee), Miami Workers CenterRight to the City (New York City, with affiliates nationwide), Showing Up for Racial Justice (chapters nationwide), Southerners On New Ground (Atlanta/Birmingham), Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Causa Justa: Just Cause (Bay Area), and Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education (Los Angeles).

 

LeftRoots was formed in 2014 by Steve Williams, a former member of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), and N’Tanya Lee, an FRSO affiliate. In essence, LeftRoots is an adjunct to the FRSO with a little bit of DSA input.

 

LeftRoots has about 500 members with branches in Miami, Philadelphia, the Bay Area, Los Angeles, Boston, and New York.

 

Left Inside/Outside Project

 

All of the above groups work together in the Left Inside/Outside Project, which was established in early 2017 to coordinate infiltration and eventual takeover of the Democratic Party.

 

Many of these groups receive significant funding from the Ford Foundation, Open Societies Foundations, Tides Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, and similar groups. Taxpayer funding additionally is often given to the front groups of socialist organizations in the form of grants and tax-exempt status. Unions often prop up front groups financially, and with logistics and training as well.

__________________

Trevor Loudon is an author, filmmaker and public speaker from New Zealand. For more than 30 years, he has researched radical left, Marxist and terrorist movements and their covert influence on mainstream politics.

 

© 2019 NoisyRoom.net

 

Donate to NoisyRoom.net Support American Values…

 

Brennan squirming over the fallout from his seditious rhetoric?


My fellow Trump supporters, I’m certain you have been upset as much I for Deep State Leftists openly threatening the President of the United States for his swamp emptying efforts (which is not moving fast enough). The Leftist hubris truly showed its ugly head when the lying (coup encouraging) criminal Andrew McCabe was not only removed from the position of Deputy Director of the FBI but was also fired when lying under oath and criminal leaks to the Leftist MSM became undeniable.

 

Enter former CIA Director John Brennan (one-time devotee CPUSA voter of Gus Hall (SEE ALSO HERE) and rumored Muslim convert). Brennan not only criticized President Trump in a vile manner but also hinted at a coup to remove the President from Office.

 

Dee Fatouros cross posted a very erudite exposition of Brennan treachery from The American Spectator. I am crossing Fatouros’ post because I like her introduction.

 

(As an aside note, I usually promote blog posts extensive on Social Media, but Fatouros has already done so. By all means go to her post on The Realistic Observer and like it!)

 

JRH 3/22/18

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Brennan squirming over the fallout from his seditious rhetoric?

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros

March 22, 2018 7:14:00 AM

The Realistic Observer

 

John Brennan

 

Well John, for someone in your position, openly calling for a coup is not the brightest of ideas. Your iniquities have gone far beyond “just” lying under oath.  Like most dwellers in the DC muck and mire, the more exposed you are, the more unhinged you become.

Ten years ago, the lawlessness and treason which occurred under the previous administration was unfathomable.

With the election of the new president, we now have well funded seditious activity to a degree not ever seen before.

Is this now the new normal? Will every newly elected administration face rebellion, anarchy and chaos if the “powers that be” do not agree with the electorate?

If the lefty elites have their way, you, you betcha.

The following article adds another chapter to the Chronicles of John Brennan.

 

As his plot to destroy Trump backfires, his squeals grow louder.

 

Facebook It was the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky who coined the phrase the “dustbin of history.” To his political opponents, he sputtered, “You are pitiful, isolated individuals! You are bankrupts. Your role is played out. Go where you belong from now on — into the dustbin of history!”

It is no coincidence that John Brennan, who supported the Soviet-controlled American Communist Party in the 1970s (he has acknowledged that he thought his vote for its presidential candidate Gus Hall threatened his prospects at the CIA; unfortunately, it didn’t), would borrow from Trotsky’s rhetoric in his fulminations against Donald Trump. His tweet last week, shortly after the firing of Andrew McCabe, reeked of Trotskyite revolutionary schlock: “When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America… America will triumph over you.”

America will triumph over a president it [sic] elected? That’s the raw language of coup, and of course it is not the first time Brennan has indulged it. In 2017, he was calling for members of the executive branch to defy the chief executive. They should “refuse to carry out” his lawful directives if they don’t agree with them, he said.

Trump has said that the Russians are “laughing their asses off” over the turmoil caused by Obamagate. No doubt many of the laughs come at the sight of Brennan, a supporter of Soviet stooges like Gus Hall, conducting a de facto coup from the top of the CIA and then continuing it after his ouster. Who needs Gus Hall when John Brennan is around? This time the Russians don’t even have to pay for the anti-American activity.

Another hardcore leftist, Samantha Power, who spent the weeks after Trump’s victory rifling through intelligence picked up on his staff, found Brennan’s revolutionary tweet very inspiring. “Not a good idea to piss off John Brennan,” she wrote. Sounded pretty dark and grave. But not to worry, she tweeted later. She just meant that the former CIA director was going to smite Trump with the power of his “eloquent voice.”

Out of power, these aging radicals can’t help themselves. They had their shot to stop Trump, they failed, and now they are furious. The adolescent coup talk grows more feverish with each passing day. We have a former CIA director calling for the overthrow of a duly elected president, a former attorney general (Eric Holder) calling for a “knife fight,” a Senate minority leader speaking ominously about what the intelligence community might do to Trump (“they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer has said), and assorted former FBI and CIA officials cheering for a coup, such as CNN’s Phil Mudd who says, “You’ve been around for 13 months. We’ve been around since 1908. I know how this game is going to be played. We’re going to win.”

In all this unhinged chatter, the partisan origins of Obamagate become clearer. The same anti-Trump hatred on display in their tweets and punditry drove the political espionage. James Kallstrom, the former FBI Assistant Director, notes that the “animus and malice” contained in Brennan’s tweet is “prima facie exposure of how he felt about Trump before the election.”

All the key figures in the decision to open up a probe on Trump wanted him to lose — from Brennan to Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump machinations included, according to the latest batch of texts with his mistress, plotting to manipulate a buddy on the FISA court. In one text, he wonders if he can finagle a meeting with his friend by inviting him to a “cocktail party.” The impropriety aforethought on display in that tweet is staggering, but of course the media has paid no attention to it, preoccupied as it is with Andrew McCabe’s retirement income.

McCabe, by the way, has removed all doubts about his capacity for partisan lying with his post-firing statement, which rests entirely upon it. With all of its anti-Trump special pleading, the statement reads like it was cobbled together by Rachel Maddow. Like so many other ruling-class frauds, McCabe seeks absolution for his perjury and leaking through liberal politics. I stand with the liberal powerful against Trump, you can’t touch me — that’s the upshot of his defense. Comey has taken the same tack. The title of his forthcoming book should be: How the Law Doesn’t Apply to the Self-Appointed Ruling Class.

What an amazing collection of entitled creeps, who long ago convinced themselves that the “rule of law” is identical to what they see as their sacred right to exercise power in any way they see fit. All the blather about Trump’s violation of the law is simply a projection of their own lawlessness. So far the coup has been thwarted. They had hoped to stop him in the campaign through political espionage. But that didn’t work. Then they tried to upend him through spying during the transition, holding out hope until the very last moment, as evidenced by Susan Rice penning her sham exculpatory note only after Trump’s swearing-in. Now they join Brennan in seeking to bury Trump in Mueller’s dustbin.

Trotsky would have understood the shorthand of all the tweets, polemics, and posturing perfectly. Nothing in this show trial bears any relationship to reality or justice. It is simply an expression of power politics, which doesn’t always end well for its exponents. As even an old Gus Hall supporter like John Brennan must know, and perhaps his fulminating panic indicates a dawning awareness of it, those who talk the loudest about their enemies heading for the ash heap of history often end up in it.

Wikimedia Commons 

Original post: The American Spectator 

________________________

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

 

About The Realistic Observer

 

Simply Finding The Truth

We are being lied to on every front, both foreign and domestic. 

 

“We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand

 

While it is true that our “leaders” have been lying to us for decades, the current administration has elevated it to Orwellian proportions. The double think, news speak, prevarication, obstructionism, and out right perfidy that comes out of Washington D.C. is heart stopping.

Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Extortion 17 are just a few of the major lies and cover-ups pushed by D.C.

Executive over reach, and Congressional abdication of authority over to the bureaucratic alphabet agencies is in itself a scandalous breach of trust with its constituents.

The unbridled national debt wrought upon us by those in office is Cloward Piven on steroids, and its ramifications will be devastating.

Last but not least is the use of the IRS as a tool for punishment and harassment of those who are on the wrong side of the administration’s political fence.

The harsh reality is that the America many of us grew up in and took for granted has now become a fascist state. We need to do our best to climb out of any boxes we may be in, thoroughly examine any assumptions we may be carrying, and search for the truth, bitter though it may be.

Knowledge is power. Even though we may feel powerless and may not see a restoration of our great country within our life time, we will hold and guard the truth so as to pass it on to future generations. They will then have the necessary knowledge to reclaim America when the time presents itself… 

 

Understanding The Communist Role In Driving The Current Chaos In America


Dee Fatouros provides an intro to some G. Edward Griffin info on Communism in America pointing out the similarities of the present to the Marxist agenda of the past. Look at today’s street chaos and the obstructionism of the Dems in Congress.

 

There is an hour and fifteen-minute video seminar conducted by Griffin in 1968 at the end. I mention this because you will notice a portion of the monologue would be politically incorrect today. AND YET a very informative seminar.

 

g-edward-griffin-1968

Edward Griffin 1969

g-edward-griffin

Edward Griffin present day

 

 

 

JRH 2/12/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Understanding The Communist Role In Driving The Current Chaos In America

 

lenin-communist-america Lenin-Communist Revolution

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros

By G. Edward Griffin

February 11, 2017 10:12:00 AM

The Realistic Observer

 

A fairly brief, but most informative read. I’m sure the reader will recognize much of what is being said as occurring today, class warfare, racial strife, big government, disinformation, (fake news), “protests” etc.

Like Jihad, Communism has its stages and its soldiers. The CPUSA is quite powerful in America and many members of Congress are followers. They are but one of the more effective occupants in the toolbox of the globalist drive for world domination. Many see Globalism as rebranded Communism, and indeed, there are undeniable similarities, but that is another discussion. The end game by any other name is world domination, loss of national sovereignty, and world wide totalitarian oppression of the world citizenry.

At the end of this write up is a video (made in 1969) discussing Communism in America, and its approach to fomenting internal revolution.  It is prescient, an hour long, but can be listened to. By the way, this video was made when Blacks were politically correctly referred to as Negros. Do not be offended.

At 21 minutes into it, he discusses African American Manning Johnson’s awakening as to the true motives of the using Black Americans as cannon fodder for the beginning revolution which resulted in his leaving the Communist Party.

Johnson wrote an insightful book, “Color Communism And Common Sense”, in 1935 in which he exposed the truth of the Communist purported “concern” for the American Negro and its attempted manipulation of them into becoming the spearhead of the  revolution in America. He also discussed the created racial divide and its intended purpose. This book is as pertinent today as was in 1935.

 

“Color Communism And Common Sense”.


Contents 

Preface by ARCHIBALD B. ROOSEVELT
I In the Web
II Subverting Negro Churches 
III Red Plot to Use Negroes 
IV Bane of Red Integration 
V Destroying the Opposition 
VI The Real “Uncle Toms” 
VII Creating Hate 
VIII Modern Day Carpet Baggers 
IX Race Pride Is Passé 
X Wisdom Needed
 

Appendices

 

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE PLANNED U.S. CIVIL WAR
by G. Edward Griffin

 

This week’s news is dominated, once again, with reports of violent demonstrations against the Trump administration. We have seen violent demonstrations before, but something new has been added that is profoundly significant. It is the rhetoric of civil war and revolution. 

The organizations spouting civil-war rhetoric are following a playbook taken from the writings of Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Communist Party. It is a rhetoric that demonizes all enemies as ‘capitalist exploiters’ (in America, where there still is a latent affinity to capitalism, the word ‘Fascism’ is preferred.) and calls for an overthrow of the government. Followers are not supposed to think about what would replace it but, for those who are curious, the answer is a ‘socialist’ government responsive, not to big business, but to the people. 


You may think that, boisterous as these demonstrators are, and although they can draw a few thousand youngsters to their events, they are but a tiny fraction of the population and could never pose a serious threat to any government. But how wrong you would be. 


Major political changes always are achieved by minorities. All revolutions are the work of less than three percent of the population, and the American Revolution was no exception. It’s not how many people there are, but how well organized they are and where they are. If the three percenters are influential in a nation’s power centers (political parties, government agencies, courts, military, schools, activist groups, labor unions, etc.), then the odds are in their favor. The masses will follow the winners. 


When you look at the rag-tag bunch carrying placards and shouting obscenities, you may be comforted thinking that they have no influence in the real power centers, but be mindful that street theater is only half the picture. Classic communist strategy involves, not one, but two types of revolution. The first is by force and violence (they call it a war of national liberation), but the other is political and peaceful (what they call a proletarian revolution). 


The two are designed to work together, one from the bottom (masses in the streets) and the other from the top (agents inside government waiting for an excuse to introduce legislation that will move the nation closer to the Leninist ideal. The strategy is, not to conquer in one fell swoop, but to do so by a series of steps, each one seen by the public as a necessary compromise to end the violence. 


In 1969, I delivered a lecture on this subject, entitled More Deadly than War. That was in the day when I was hanging out at the communist book store in Los Angeles doing research on collectivism, so I was loaded with communist publications to illustrate my message. The presentation was recorded on black-and-white film, released in VHS format, and then forgotten. Someone put it on YouTube about five years ago so, when we created our Reality Zone YouTube channel last year, we copied it to that collection. 


It has been almost fifty years since I gave much thought to that lecture so, when I started to write this commentary, I decided to watch it again to see what I said. Frankly, I was blown away by how every point applies directly to what is happening today.


If you are interested in my analysis, here is the link. (video below)

 

VIDEO: More Deadly Than War – A Lecture by G. Edward Griffin [1:14:36]

 

Posted by Reality Zone

Published on Oct 8, 2016 

 

…The Blueprint for Revolution in America….

This address by G. Edward Griffin, given in 1968, is as current as today’s headlines. Mr. Griffin shows that the Leninist strategy for conquest involves two kinds of revolution: One is violent; the other is non-violent.

While most people think only of violent revolution, the non-violent phase is where most of the action has been in the United States. Leninists call it the Proletarian Revolution and it involves the gradual transition to Marxism (which is merely one form of collectivism) by use of the ballot box. Control is achieved through economic pressures rather than guns and executions.

This program shows how Leninists utilize mass-membership organizations, politicians, and the parliamentary process to bring about totalitarianism with little opposition from those who are being subjugated.

For more information, visit http://www.realityzone.com

 

___________

EDWARD GRIFFIN – Non-Real Observer Bio

 

EDWARD GRIFFINis a writer, documentary film producer, and Founder of Freedom Force International. Listed in Who’s Who in America, he is well known because of his talent for researching difficult topics and presenting them in clear terms that all can understand.

 

He has dealt with such diverse subjects as archaeology and ancient Earth history, the Federal Reserve System and international banking, terrorism, internal subversion, the history of taxation, U.S. foreign policy, the science and politics of cancer therapy, the Supreme Court, and the United Nations.

 

His better-known works include The Creature from Jekyll Island, World without Cancer, The Discovery of Noah’s Ark, Moles in High Places, The Open Gates of Troy, No Place to Hide, The Capitalist Conspiracy, More Deadly than War, The Grand Design, The Great Prison Break, and The Fearful Master

 

Ed is a graduate of the University of Michigan where he majored in speech and communications. He is …  READ ENTIRETY

 

Marxist/Muslim Axis: ‘Enemies Within’ Documentary Exposes Proposed DNC Chair Keith Ellison


unholy-alliance-communism-islam-bho-background

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) appears at this point to be the shew-in for the DNC’s next Chairman. A Conservative should not be surprised since the last two Chairpersons in Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Donna Brazile were both exposed as being as crooked at their Dem nominated candidate for President, i.e. Crooked Hillary.

 

Apparently, Rep. Ellison is the classic Dem Leftist oxymoron uniting the theopolitics of Islam with a Communist ideology. The oxymoron of the matter is that Islam is a supremacist religion and Communism is atheistic.

 

JRH 11/16/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

Marxist/Muslim Axis: ‘Enemies Within’ Documentary Exposes Proposed DNC Chair Keith Ellison

 

By Trevor Loudon

Originally: New Zeal

November 15, 2016

NoisyRoom.net

Posted by  TMH

 

Filmmaker Trevor Loudon’s new documentary The Enemies Within exposes the communist and radical Islamist background of the probable new leader of the Democratic Party.

 

rep-keith-ellison-d-minnesota-center

Rep. Keith Ellison (D}, Minnesota), center

 

Keith Ellison, a Marxist/Muslim Democratic Congressman from Minnesota, could soon become the Democratic National Committee chairman.

 

With the endorsements of Senators Harry ReidChuck SchumerBernie Sanders and more than 250,000 signatures on an “Ellison for chairman” petition, Representative Ellison is the early favorite for the position.

 

Many writers have focused on Ellison’s Islamic beliefs, but few have examined his extensive Marxist connections.

 

VIDEO: THE ENEMIES WITHIN | Keith Ellison


 

Posted by Trevor Loudon

Uploaded on Oct 24, 2016

 

Trevor Loudon’s The Enemies Within poses a simple question – “Could your Congressman pass an FBI background check?”

 

With close ties to both the Communist Party USA and several Muslim Brotherhood front groups, Trevor Loudon believes that Congressman Ellison would have no chance of passing even the most the rudimentary type of background check, applied to the most low-level federal government employees.

 

Yet within days, Representative Ellison may lead one of this country’s two main political parties.

 

For further information contact Trevor Loudon, 772-267-8189, or trevor@enemieswithinmovie.com.

_________________

© 2016 NoisyRoom.net

 

This is the Crooked Hillary too Many Want to be POTUS


remember-hillary-is-crooked

John R. Houk

© October 9, 2016

 

The Left Stream Media, many Establishment Republicans and NeverTrumpers Conservatives have been hammering Donald Trump about his deplorable womanizing remarks back in 2005. The Left Stream Media reporting on Trump’s past is quite unsurprising.

 

I am very disappointed in Republicans and Conservatives that have decided to abandon Trump because of a past moral issue but have been quite feckless in going after Crooked Hillary and Sex-Predator Slick Willie – the Leftist wife/husband team – for way over a quarter century.

Marxist Saul Alinsky and a young Crooked Hillary

saul-alinsky-crooked-hillary-2

 

Below are two articles relating to Crooked Hillary’s political ideology (Marxism) and the obvious Teflon fix that publicly came FBI Director James Comey but was more than likely ordered by Leftist-in-Chief and filtered on down through the Attorney General lackey Loretta Lynch.

 

And trust me, these two articles are just the tip of the iceberg of the nefariousness of Crooked Hillary. The most recent exposé of documents linked directly to Hillary nefariousness are not mentioned in this post. Of course the Obama Administration and probably the Crooked Hillary campaign are doing the bait and switch tactic without evidence of proof that the Russians did the hack then rewrote the email dump to implicate the queen of corruption. Remember the Benghazi and Obamacare lies before you believe the accusations implicating the Russians.

 

JRH 10/9/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

Hillary Clinton, A Communist?

 

By LEON PUISSEGUR

OCTOBER 7, 2016

Freedom Outpost

 

If one looks into her strange past, one finds that Hillary Rodham Clinton had a close relationship with a radical and Communist/Socialist by the name of Saul Alinsky.

 

We will present a lot to be digested and we hope people read this article all the way through and go to the sites shown so they will know the truth about Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, both of which seem to be so closely aligned with the Communist Party that any lines that once divided them can no longer be found, and even their platforms are nearly identical.

 

We showed how Hillary Clinton had close ties to Saul Alinsky in previous articles here and here. Yes, Hillary wrote and sat with Saul Alinsky to not only study his Communist ideology, but also to use it in her quest for power and control, both of which give the Communist ideology roots to grow from.

 

Let us show the basic principles of Hillary Clinton’s idol, Saul Alinsky. Please take note of the 8 different ways that Communist Saul Alinsky wants to “Change” the way the United States operates. Let us look very closely at the ideas of Saul Alinsky and compare them to what both Hillary Rodham Clinton and Obama have done in relation to the 8 ideas of Saul Alinsky.

 

Saul Alinsky stated, “There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important!”

 

1)      Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

2)      Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible. Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3)      Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4)      Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5)      Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6)      Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7)      Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

8)      Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

 

Now let us take a look at what has already happened and what Hillary Clinton wants to do and what Obama and the Democratic Party has already done.  You have to remember that anytime words such as, but not limited to, “Racist,” “Feminist,” etc., are key words used by the Saul Alinsky model to destroy your enemy and keep them fighting to disconnect those ideas from them while those making the statements continue on with their ideas, which, in most cases, do not help the poor or the United States.

 

Here is the connection between Hillary Clinton and her idol, Saul Alinsky:

 

Healthcare – We see the first idea to be pushed by the Alinsky Communist idea is to “Control Healthcare.” Remember, when Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she pushed for a nationwide Healthcare system, exactly what Alinsky outlined to begin the creation of the Socialist/Communist state. We should make a strong note: President Obama was also a strong advocate of the Alinsky model. Today, we have the Obamacare joke of healthcare, but it does follow the Saul Alinsky ideology.

 

Poverty – Today, we see that more people live in poverty in the United States, and this has increased since Obama took office, so here we can clearly see that the second action in the Alinsky model is being pursued by Obama and we can rest assured that Hillary Clinton will push this even higher if she is elected; after all, she supports the Alinsky ideology.

 

Debt – The debt of our nation has moved into territory that has never been seen before during the entire history of the United States.  Hillary Clinton wants to continue on this same line of action by increasing the burden by keeping the debt rising so she can control all of our lives. Hillary Clinton also shouted very loudly on the stage; “We will raise the taxes on the middle class.” Strangely, the people cheered!

 

Gun Control – This is so far the hardest to complete, but Obama has done all he can, including coming up with illegal Executive Actions that stifle the ownership of guns because of his actions. But Hillary Clinton stated that she would like to see “common sense” gun control, which is code for taking all the guns from the people. Hillary Clinton has stated that, “… I would like to see gun control actions like the Australians have.” That would mean total confiscation of guns and jail time for anyone who does not comply with the government demand to turn your guns in. Hillary Clinton can do this by placing Supreme Court Justices that will say the Second Amendment does not apply to the average citizen – check out the people she will consider for Supreme Court Justices: they all are AGAINST guns.

 

Welfare – This will and has been growing since Obama has been president. Under Hillary Clinton, it will continue to grow, since she has stated this in many ways and will increase the welfare rolls, just like Alinsky states. Hillary Clinton will bring in many more people from the Middle East and place them all on the welfare rolls, giving them no opportunity to find jobs and by giving them food, housing, and income, just like her idol Saul Alinsky outlines in his 8 levels of control.

 

Education – Hillary Clinton has clearly stated in her book, It Take A Village“I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise the children. Parents have a secondary role.”

 

Here Hillary Clinton shows very plainly that she will use the Communist/Socialist Saul Alinsky ideology to “educate” the children, which is actually brainwashing the children to think that they have to work for the Government to pay for their education. This alone should make many parents consider not to vote for this lady who only wants the parents to have a secondary role to their children and allow the government to have the primary role. This is not the “American” way to Freedom and pursuit of happiness.

 

Religion – This is the most profound act of hatred by the current administration, and Hillary Clinton will follow through with this ideology, just like Obama is doing now.  Before 2009, our nation could pray at football games, we could place a cross on public property, we could worship our beliefs, which are, of the majority, Christian. Today, our nation has moved away from the old phrase “God and Country.” Today, it is “Politics and country.” Our nation was founded on the belief that God is our creator, and that is clearly displayed through the Declaration of Independence.  Some will come out and say that is not right because the Constitution says the government cannot support any religion.  That would be a very false statement, since the very idea was that the Government cannot say we have only one religion, and that is the one the government says it is.  Freedom of religion was developed to make sure the government did not dictate what religion the people had to abide by: that is what England did, and the founding fathers did not want the government to dictate what religion to force upon the people.  It also did not mean that the government would make religion be evil and not accepted by the government, as it has done under the Obama administration. This would be even worse under a Hillary Clinton administration.

 

Class warfare – We can already see this one from Obama and Hillary Clinton doubling down and saying that the rich have to pay their fair share, meaning, as did Saul Alinsky, that they have to pay more until they become poor. The fact that Hillary Clinton is going to continue on with the “Class Warfare” is not to be doubted for one minute as she does not hide this at all, saying those who make the most should pay the most. Hillary Clinton will most assuredly divide the nation even more than Obama has, and this will never be settled until the United States is so divided that the government will have to intervene to “separate” what they created: a police state.

 

Showing and comparing these 8 items and breaking them down shows that, without a doubt, Obama, who also studied Saul Alinsky, began the division needed to make the Communist ideology work, and Hillary Clinton will continue it.  If you wish to see our nation coming together like it did before Obama got into office, do not vote for Hillary Clinton.

 

How much does the Communist Party of America support Hillary Clinton?  That is perhaps the most interesting question we could ask. Let us look at an article exposing the fact that the Communist Party supports Hillary Clinton.

 

This article describes what the Communist Party USA likes about her and why it supports her entirely.

 

“The Communist Party USA may not control many actual votes, but what they lack in support is made up for in enthusiasm.

 

That passion was in full display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering their national political convention last month. And their convention was the Democratic National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.”

 

Some of the Communist Party USA’s talking points sound an awful lot like Hillary Clinton’s talking points…or is that the other way around? In either case, the points are eerily similar. Let’s check some excerpts from the Communist Party’s article on that.

 

“Donald Trump steals wages. He’d pick your pocket in a New York minute. He lies and spreads hate. He’s a racist and a bully.”

 

“Do not underestimate Trump and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was surprised by the successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are united in purpose: delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability and violence against working-class people of all races, genders, religions and sexual orientations. They are united with giant corporations and the billionaire class in their drive to lower wages and living conditions and increase their profits and power.”

 

“With Senator Bernie Sanders endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message was loud and clear, “We’re stronger together.” That is what it will take to win in November.”

 

“The union movement, communities of color, students, women, progressives and the newborn “political revolution” can help generate voter enthusiasm by talking and tweeting about Clinton and the issues. Challenging sexism is a must as well as racism, which has been a coded (and overt) staple of presidential elections for decades.”

 

“Winning in a landslide” is needed now more than ever, and that landslide for Clinton could swing control of the Senate to Democrats, and other potential positive effects could be felt on the ‘down ballot’ congressional and state races.”

 

Wait, isn’t that what the Democratic Party said – well maybe in different words?  It does look like Hillary Clinton has taken advice from the Communist Party of the USA with her lines. All this time and the people have been led to believe that Hillary Clinton was the first to use the words “racism,” “sexism,” and so on. Please just look at what the Communist Party states: if it were not on their web site, one would think it had been written by the Clinton Campaign.

 

Let us look at a direct quote of the Communist Party USA paper that describes Hillary Clinton’s pick for her running mate, Tim Kaine: this is where it gets weird, as the Communist Party not only fully supports and maybe helps Hillary Clinton, but also seems to accept her VP, Tim Kaine, with open arms.

 

“Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.

 

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

 

It would seem that Hillary Clinton is either working with the Communist Party USA, or they are working with her. No one can really distinguish the lines between them, as they are so close to each other that lines between Democrats and Communists have seemingly vanished since, in 2009, they pushed voters toward Obama and keep pushing the Democrats into the now very blurred lines between the old Democratic Party and the current Communist/Democratic Party today. But check it out for yourself below.

 

“The Communists, who for decades ran their own candidates for president and vice president but supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary and Bernie. The party also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine.

 

“He’s a great choice,” wrote staffer Larry Rubin on the first day of the convention. “Kaine pushed the political envelope of Virginia, an erstwhile red southern state, in a progressive direction – and won! He was elected mayor of Richmond, then governor of the state and then senator. Everyone agrees: he’s a sincere, nice guy.”

 

No this should be enough to show that our nation would become totally Socialist leaning heavily towards Communism under Hillary Rodham Clinton, due to Democrats continuing on with their ideas from 1856 when they were the party of slavery. Wait, maybe they really want to bring slavery back, but in the form of government hand outs! Just check out someone else’s comments on how the Democrats have moved more toward the Communist side than to the Freedom side.

 

“David Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties: “Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.

 

“If that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”

 

The interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Alinsky and his work.

 

Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist.

 

Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.”

 

This covers a lot, but it has to be shown in order to link it all together to illustrate the closeness of the Communist and Democratic Party and how it may also link Hillary Clinton to being a communist simply by allowing this type of hyperbole to be stated. We show just what has to be shown, and it makes a good connection to the Hillary Clinton campaign, which follows the Communist Party USA ideology almost to a tee.  That in and of itself should create a firewall between the White House and Hillary Clinton.  If she is elected, the nation built by our forefathers will have failed, due to the ignorance of seeing what is near the tip of our noses. If you believe in the Freedom, the Constitution, and our United States, then you will pass this on to all you know and make it go viral to show facts that have to be shown here because the Lame Stream Media will never show, it as they are part of the problem.

 

“Clinton was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.

 

Last year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.

 

Dick Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”

 

“The revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.

 

David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.

 

“When radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.

 

Interestingly, the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the Democratic Party.

 

The drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

 

“One of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”

 

Farah reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.

 

“Back then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – – was “Red Revolution” sung to the tune of “Red, Red Robbin.”

 

“For those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,’” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”

 

Meanwhile, an email sent out by the Communist Party USA over the weekend had this to say: “The 2016 elections are in full swing. Many of our districts and clubs and members are actively participating in the campaign to strike a blow to the extreme right and defeat Donald Trump and other down ballot GOP extremists. If you’re not yet involved, there are many ways to get connected with labor and our allies, especially in the key battleground states and in targeted congressional and state legislative races. But no matter where you live you can be part of this exciting election. We can defeat Trump, oust right-wing majorities in Congress and statehouses while also building powerful labor-led people’s movements, advancing a progressive agenda and political independence at the grassroots. We have some great tools, beginning with People’s World daily (sic) Marxist analysis.”

 

(Source)

__________________

FBI agents are ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe

 

hillary-clinton-and-fbi-director-james-comey-photo-getty-images

Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey Photo: Getty Images

 

By Paul Sperry

October 6, 2016

The Counter Jihad Report

Originally New York Post

 

Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly” whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private e-mail server.

 

Feeling the heat from congressional critics, Comey last week argued that the case was investigated by career FBI agents, “So if I blew it, they blew it, too.”

 

But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.

 

“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer-investigations unit.

 

Instead of going to prosecutors and insisting on using grand jury leverage to compel testimony and seize evidence, Comey allowed immunity for several key witnesses, including potential targets.

 

The immunity agreements came with outrageous side deals, including preventing agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when she communicated with the server administrator who destroyed subpoenaed e-mails.

 

Comey also agreed to have Mills’ laptop destroyed after the restricted search, denying Congress the chance to look at it and making the FBI an accomplice to the destruction of evidence.

 

Comey’s immunized witnesses nonetheless suffered chronic lapses in memory, made unsubstantiated claims of attorney-client privilege upon tougher questioning and at least two gave demonstrably false statements. And yet Comey indulged it all.

 

What’s more, Comey cut a deal to give Clinton a “voluntary” witness interview on a major holiday, and even let her ex-chief of staff sit in on the interview as a lawyer, even though she, too, was under investigation.

 

Clinton’s interview, the culmination of a yearlong investigation, lasted just 3 ½ hours. Despite some 40 bouts of amnesia, she wasn’t called back for questioning; and three days later, Comey cleared her of criminal wrongdoing.

 

“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold director Comey responsible.”

 

Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

 

The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”

 

“Each month for 27 years, I received oral and computer admonishments concerning the proper protocol for handling top secret and other classified material, and was informed of the harsh penalties, to include prosecution and incarceration” for mishandling such material, he pointed out. “Had myself or my colleagues engaged in behavior of the magnitude of Hillary Clinton, as described by Comey, we would be serving time in Leavenworth.”

 

Former FBI official I.C. Smith knows a thing or two about Clinton corruption. After working at FBI headquarters as a section chief in the National Security Division, he retired as special agent in charge of the Little Rock, Ark., field office, where he investigated top Clinton fund-raisers for public corruption and even Chinese espionage.

 

“FBI agents upset with Comey’s decision have every reason to feel that way,” Smith said. “Clearly there was a different standard applied to Clinton.”

 

“I have no doubt resourceful prosecutors and FBI agents could have come up with some charge that she would have been subject to prosecution,” the 25-year veteran added. “What she did is absolutely abhorrent for anyone who has access to classified information.”

 

Smith said Congress should subpoena the case’s agents to testify about the direction they received from Comey and their supervisors: “It would be interesting to see what the results would be if those involved with the investigation were questioned under oath.”

 

Comey made the 25 agents who worked on the case sign nondisclosure agreements. But others say morale has sunk inside the bureau.

 

“The director is giving the bureau a bad rap with all the gaps in the investigation,” one agent in the Washington field office said. “There’s a perception that the FBI has been politicized and let down the country.”

 

Comey has turned a once-proud institution known for its independence into one that bows to election pressure, hands out political immunity to candidates and effectively pardons their co-conspirators. He’s turned the FBI into the Federal Bureau of Immunity and lost the trust and respect of not only his agents but the country at large. He ought to step down.

 

Paul Sperry, formerly Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, is author of “Infiltration.”

 

Also see:

 

 

______________

This is the Crooked Hillary too Many Want to be POTUS

John R. Houk

© October 9, 2016

_______________

Hillary Clinton, A Communist?

 

Copyright © 2016 FreedomOutpost.com

_____________

FBI agents are ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe

 

About Counter Jihad Report

 

There is an urgent need for the public to become informed about the Global Islamic Jihad Movement. We must demand from our leaders that they become familiar with Islamic Law and jihadist ideology so that our counterterrorism policies can better protect us from this growing threat.

 

This blog is mainly a news aggregating site but also includes an extensive library of resources for studying Islam and networking with other Counter Jihad activists. My goal has been to pull from a variety of the most trusted and reliable sources to educate the public on the counter jihad movement. The many RSS feeds and counterjihad twitter feed in the sidebar are meant to provide a time saving jumping off point to access all the headlines and breaking news.

 

My Interest in Islamic Jihad stems from the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in which my cousin, Ken Haas, was killed. Ken left a career as a philosophy professor to work for the CIA and was the Station Chief in Beirut. He and his wife of one year had just finished lunch in Ken’s office at the Embassy and kissed good-bye. She had driven back to their apartment where she heard the explosion. After several agonizing days of waiting while rescuers sifted through the wreckage it was finally revealed that Ken had died instantly at his desk.

 

In all, 63 people were killed, 17 of whom were Americans. The entire U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Middle Eastern contingent was killed setting our intelligence back for years. Hezbollah had READ THE REST 

 

A Radical Red Commie Rat


hillary-disasterous-promises

I’m a bit late in posting this Justin Smith submission. After last night’s Trump/Crooked Hillary debate. I thought I’d begin this intro with Justin’s apt description of the former Secretary of State to give reader’s something to think about if you recall Hillary constantly told listeners to do some fact checking on Donald Trump’s assertions:

 

Hillary Clinton is … a radical red Commie rat with a miserable reputation of uttering flagrant and prodigious lies, who advocates class warfare, state ownership of all property and an egalitarian Utopia operated by an oligarchy, despite all her recent attempts to present herself as a centrist.

 

JRH 9/27/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

A Radical Red Commie Rat

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 9/24/2016 1:40 PM

 

Hillary Clinton is not a “liberal” or a “progressive” if one wants to be accurate. She’s a radical red Commie rat with a miserable reputation of uttering flagrant and prodigious lies, who advocates class warfare, state ownership of all property and an egalitarian Utopia operated by an oligarchy, despite all her recent attempts to present herself as a centrist.

 

Hillary currently has the full support of the Communist Party USA, which is not surprising. She hasn’t changed her support of full blown Marxism and collapsing the capitalist system, since Bill Clinton operative Larry Nichols saw her in Arkansas, during the 1970s, wearing a medallion that read, “Proud member of the American Communist Party”. She’s as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and barely more moderate than Bernie Sanders, who is a self-avowed socialist.

 

Hillary has fought for the Marxist ideology and worked to ensure it infiltrated its way into the public education system from 1969 on. After she met with the radical Leftist Saul Alinsky in 1968, she subsequently wrote a positive analysis of Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ for her senior thesis at Wellesley College, titled ‘There is Only the Fight …’, and later, she became a co-chair for Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, a “community organizing” group, from 1972 into the 1990s. She used her position as First Lady to insert Alinsky’s ideas into President Bill Clinton’s education policy.

 

Radical Marxist indoctrination of Americans over the past sixty years has largely been successful, and it has created an extremely ill-informed, poorly educated, group of people that includes most Democrats and some Independents and Republicans, who accept the “progressive” notion of a “living Constitution”, which functionally is not any different from not having a Constitution. This has given sway to an anything-goes mentality that allows the unlimited expansion of government, placing America on the road to ruin.

 

Under Obama’s guidance and policies, today’s Democratic Party has made such a huge leftward lunge that it is now nearly indistinguishable from the Communist Party, and Hillary was helping Obama every step of the way. This is not an exaggeration whatsoever, and it can be verified at the Communist Party USA’s website, where it is difficult to find much, if any, difference between the CPUSA’s and the Democratic Party’s views and solutions on the issues, from wealth distribution to [homosexual] “gay rights”, the condemnation of “racist cops”, universal healthcare, climate change and unfettered immigration.

 

On August 9th, 2016, Charisma News showed the tight bond between the CPUSA and the Democratic Party, reporting: “CPUSA National Chairman John Bachtel actually supported U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. But when it became obvious … that Hillary Clinton would be the Democrat nominee, he announced he would vote for her in the November election.”

 

Hillary is promising everything under the sun to her fellow radical red Commie rat comrades, and she is prepared to deliver results on the backs of the wealthy, the producers and job-makers, essentially stealing wealth through massive taxation. She leads a socialist war on the rich in order to fund her job-killing and nation destroying programs, such as cradle-to-grave healthcare, a radical and costly climate change agenda based on junk science, tax-subsidized abortions, free college tuition for all, new regulatory mandates on businesses and the LGBT agenda.

 

Even as Hillary and the Democratic Party hint at unspecified “middle class” tax relief, they propose a tax hike on families making at least $250,000 a year. Somehow they easily ignore the fact that total taxes at all levels consume up to half of many families’ incomes.

 

In 2015, the federal government took a record $3.18 trillion in tax dollars, and yet, with the national debt at $20 trillion, Hillary is proposing to spend even more.

 

Does anyone really believe Hillary’s plans for the United States are sustainable? She certainly doesn’t. But what better way to usher in the complete Socialist Economic Model and One Party Rule than by collapsing our capitalist economy, while undermining America’s Judeo-Christian principles, just as Marx and Alinsky outlined?

 

Among many other harmful policies, in part, Hillary will:

 

  • continue attacking fossil fuel production while supporting new EPA rules on fracking

 

  • force all states to expand Medicaid

 

  • oppose photo ID laws while supporting same day voter registration and universal automatic voter registration, making it easier to steal elections through voter fraud and illegal aliens casting votes for Democrats.

 

  • continue Common Core and expand the federal role in education while supporting access to restrooms and locker rooms based on gender identity instead of biological sex.

 

  • And she will limit free speech by overturning the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling that allows nonprofits, corporations and unions to have a voice in the political process while she also seeks to criminalize any criticism of Islam.

 

 

America has witnessed Hillary’s abuse of power as Secretary of State and the enrichment of herself and her family through blatant influence selling to agents of Kazakhstan, China, Saudi Arabia and Russia. Contributions flowing into the Clinton Foundation and Bill’s speaking fees grew exponentially and by leaps and bounds under her tenure at State, and deals detrimental to U.S. interests, like Uranium One, became common place. Her corrupt approach to power was further evidenced by her illegal email scheme and the lies and cover-up that followed; Hillary Clinton also lied about Benghazi, even to grieving family members, because a terror attack was a political liability.

 

Just as troubling, Hillary’s Vice-Presidential pick, former Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, is a known sympathizer of Islamofascist terrorists and Marxist revolutionaries. During the 1980s Kaine embraced the hardcore Cold War variety of Marxist liberation theology in Honduras, and he was known to have actively supported the left-wing gun running Jesuits, such as Father Jim Carney, and Nicaraguan Sandinistas [communists], such as Jose Reyes Mata, who served with the infamous Che Guevara in Bolivia. Fast forward to 2007 and America finds Kaine appointing Esam Omeish to Virginia’s Immigration Commission; Omeish has ties to terror financing as well as known terrorists through the Islamic Center of Passaic County (New Jersey) and other Islamic organizations. Kaine also gave out a Lifetime Achievement Award in 2011 to Jamal Barzinji, who was investigated by the FBI in 2003 due to his terrorist ties and associations with known islamofascist terrorist, Sami al-Arian.

 

I wonder if Kaine turned a blind-eye to the terrorism ties, because of the $10,000 donation Barzinji’s organization [International Institute of Islamic Thought] handed him in 2011 and the $43,000 from Barzinji-tied New Dominion PAC, or simply because Kaine is an anti-American radical red Commie rat, just like Hillary.

 

What will you do to fight back?

 

Hillary Clinton is a Communist and a tyrant, and the choice is as plain as day and night for any American patriot. Nothing will change if Clinton is elected, except America will become impoverished and freedom and liberty will become ideas tucked away in historical archives, unknown to future generations. Anyone who loves America must do their dead-level best, using everything at their disposal, to prevent Hillary from ever again entering the White House, and we must take any risk to ensure America continues in freedom with individual liberty alive and well centuries from today.

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary


CPUSA & Crooked Hillary

This article was originally posted on WND. The writing is about how the U.S. Leftist Communists are concerned that Crooked Hillary is alienating some Dem Leftists. The article uses the pc version for Leftists with the word Progressives.

 

JRH 8/29/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros

Sourced from WND

August 28, 2016 07:26 PM PDT

The Realistic Observer

 

 The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) has infiltrated the Democrat Party far more than most realize. Its influence has been steady and pernicious like a slow growing cancer. It has now taken over the entire body politic in varying degrees. Although much of the electorate remains uninformed or in denial as to this phenomenon, many exist who do recognize that something is not quite right with the Dems.

Numerous progressives remain idealistic and cannot neither relate nor stomach what they are seeing in the present party as corruption, hypocrisy, and betrayal. (Many in the GOP have the same disgust with their party, but that is another story).

Witness the rise of Bernie Sanders. Was it because his supporters were true hard core Socialists/Communists or because they were fed up with leaders who talked out of both sides of their mouths and saw him as “the real thing”.

The following post discusses the dismay of the CPUSA over the fact that not all Dems seem willing to support Hillary. They are concerned. She must win in November in order for the agenda begun in earnest by the present WH occupant to continue.   

These voters have apparently abandoned Hillary and possibly the party.  

 

Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton (Photo- Twitter)Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)

 

They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar’

 

WASHINGTON – How deep and wide is the Communist Party USA’s support for Hillary Clinton?

It’s unambiguous. It’s 100 percent. And it’s uncompromising.

A new editorial on the party’s home page calls any thoughts about voting for the Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein or not voting for the top of the Democratic ticket “a flawed strategy.”

The CPUSA, birthed by Josef Stalin’s pocketbooks and sustained through the fall of the Soviet Union by KGB subsidies, is all in for Hillary.

The party is also excited about America’s corporate press jumping on the bandwagon with support for its candidate.

“Unprecedented early endorsements of Clinton have appeared in the Washington Post and Houston Chronicle, which described Trump as a ‘danger to the Republic,’” the editorial states with approval. “Many refer to Trump as an extreme authoritarian or worse, as a fascist.”

On the other hand, the Democrats meet the political litmus test with flying rainbow colors:

“The message from the DNC was the polar opposite. It reflected the broad electoral coalition backing Clinton, including the labor movement, African American, Latino, Asian and other communities of color, women, the LGBT community, youth, environmentalists, immigrant and disabled rights advocates.”

However, the CPUSA is concerned that not all ‘progressives” are on board for Clinton.

“But there are still some progressives, including some Bernie or Bust activists, who refuse to support Clinton,” the editorial says. “They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar. They see nothing positive in Clinton, her historic candidacy or the Democratic Party platform. They dismiss the broad electoral coalition, including the labor movement, that is backing Clinton and that has shaped the platform, a coalition with obvious leverage. To them, she is as bad as Trump.”

It continues: “Some are voting for Green Party candidate Jill Stein to ‘send a message.’ Still others hope a Clinton defeat provokes a crisis in the Democratic Party leading to its break-up.”

 

Jill Stein of the Green PartyJill Stein of the Green Party

 

Sounding like a press release from the DNC, the Communist Party editorial explains: “This is a flawed strategy. First, like it or not, we have a two party system. One of the two major parties will win and govern. If this were a parliamentary democracy different tactics would be called for.”

“To call for a vote against Clinton is to separate oneself from this electoral coalition,” it states.

Not only do the Communists want Hillary to win, they want her to win big, explaining “mandates are real. This election will be a national referendum on racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia and Islamophobia. The aim should be a landslide defeat of Trump and a decisive rejection of hate. The election of Clinton as the first woman president would make history. A landslide would not end sexism, but it would represent a mighty blow just as the election of President Obama was a blow against racism. It would advance democracy. A landslide makes it more likely that GOP congressional and state legislative majorities can be ousted and an end put to the politics of obstruction. Most people tend to vote straight ticket.”

“A landslide will give added weight to the progressive platform adopted at the Democratic Convention and give encouragement to appoint progressive Supreme Court justices,” the editorial continues. “It would be added pressure against backsliding on opposition to TPP and other trade deals. It will put public opinion and the movements in a better position to pressure against Clinton’s tendency toward military adventurism and policies of regime change.”

Again, the CPUSA warns off against voting Green.

“Voting Green Party separates activists and voters from these key forces,” the editorial says. “One cannot credibly engage in mobilizations of labor, civil rights, women’s organizations, LGBT community, and environmentalists while also advocating voting Green Party.”

The Communist Party “press” was out in force at the Democratic National Convention in full support of the Dems and their nominee from the beginning.

Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

The Communist Party was so eager to endorse Barack Obama for re-election, it couldn’t wait until 2012.
It did so a year before the campaign officially got under way. The party was jubilant in 2008, when Obama won his first race for the presidency.

 

Saul AlinskySaul Alinsky

 

Hailing Barack Obama’s win as a victory for the “working class,” the Communist Party USA called on the president-elect to carry out his promises, including his noted commitment to “spread the wealth.” An editorial by the People’s Weekly World, the official newspaper of the party, said the victory was for “workers of all job titles, professions, shapes, colors, sizes, hairstyles and languages.”

In 2009, President Obama’s leadership was “one of the best opportunities that Americans have had in decades,” declared a civil-rights activist addressing an overflow crowd at a gathering sponsored by the official newspaper of the Community Party USA.

The party was never disappointed by Obama. Here’s how it critiqued Obama’s final State of the Union Address earlier this year:

“In his final SOTU address, President Obama projected a bold vision for a more socially and economically just nation while appealing to the hopes of the American people. … President Obama pointedly rejected right-wing-Republican policy solutions including repeal of Obamacare, aggressive military buildup and action, tax cuts to the wealthy, blocking common-sense gun control … He also rejected efforts to exploit the fears of the American people using hate, anti-Muslim bigotry, racism and division.

“The challenges facing the nation and planet are immense: climate crisis, massive concentration and inequality of wealth, growing poverty and declining wages, joblessness, including skyrocketing unemployment in the African-American community, over $1 trillion in student debt, a crumbling infrastructure, underfunded schools and social services, lack of affordable housing, a frayed retirement security system, etc.”

David Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties: “Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.

“If that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”

Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist. Interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Saul Alinsky and his work.

Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.

Clinton was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.

Read the history of the attacks on marriage and the family, from the days of Karl Marx and Margaret Sanger to those now pushing for mandatory recognition of same-sex “marriage,” in “Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left has Sabotaged Family and Marriage.”

Last year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.

Dick Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”

“The revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.

David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.

“When radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.

Interestingly, the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the Democratic Party.

The drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

“One of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”

Farah reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.

“Back then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – was ‘Red Revolution’ sung to the tune of ‘Red, Red Robbin.’”

Here are the lyrics as they still appear on the Congressional Progressive Caucus website as captured by the Wayback Machine: (The original site was scrubbed within hours after it was exposed by WND)

 

When the Red Revolution
brings its solution
along, along

There’ll be no more lootin’
when we start shootin’
that Wall Street throng

Wake up you proletarians
Don’t act like seminarians
Expropriate barbarians
Build a workers’ republic

Exploitation and degradation
you won’t find here
Surplus value and capital will disappear

I’m just a Red again,
saying what I’ve said again,
When the Red Revolution … da, da, da, da
brings its solution … da, da, da, da, da
along


“How do these people get away with denying they are redder than a robin’s breast while singing songs like this – and printing them on the Internet?” asked Farah incredulously.

The song list also included lyrics to “Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie,” sung to the tune of “Frere Jacques.”

 

Are you sleeping, are you sleeping,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill you all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie

 

“For those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,’” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”
Source:   WND
__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

The Realistic Observer posts everything in bold text. Honestly I find that annoying thus I took away most of the bold text. I indented the short verse prose in the post.

 

The Realistic Observer Homepage

 

LEFT PROMOTING MASS DELUSION, SAYS JOURNALIST


As part of the progressive-left influence that Kupelian says is so adversely affecting the nation, Americans are being intimidated, bullied and seduced into accepting a whole slew of false “narratives” as though they represented reality, said Kupelian.

A “narrative,” he said, is just “a nice name for a … mass delusion.”

… I’m saying we have a culture and a presidency in which basically we’re taught there is no God, there is no right and wrong and the biblical morals that this country did pretty well with for several centuries are oppressive and racist and we need to get rid of them!” …

How can a person cope with living in a world of false narratives and dreamlike illusions? Kupelian argues the solution is simple:

“We need to wake up. We just need to wake up.”

He continued: “People tell me, ‘You know, this is a nightmare we’re living in under Obama.’ … It’s true, but there’s only one step away from a nightmare to being awake again. You just have to wake up. You have to put aside these sleepy delusions” that make us feel so comfortable in our dream world, he said. (LEFT PROMOTING MASS DELUSION, SAYS JOURNALIST; By Joseph Farah; WND; 11/11/15)

That is an excerpt from WND’s editorial/promotion of author David Kupelian’s new book about how the Obama/Leftist American transformation agenda is destroying America from within by eradicating everything that has made the USA an exceptional nation in a world of oppressive agendas.

I haven’t read Kupelian’s book yet but I’m going to get a copy.

JRH 11/12/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

LEFT PROMOTING MASS DELUSION, SAYS JOURNALIST

Hear ‘Snapping’ author David Kupelian on fast-paced San Francisco broadcast


From email alert sent by Joseph Farah

Email sent: 11/12/2015 5:09 AM

November 11, 2015

WND

Listen to David Kupelian’s rapid-fire interview with Brian Sussman on San Francisco’s KSFO Morning Show:

Embed
http://player.ooyala.com/iframe.js#ec=psYmhyeDqeaRWPGyiJXjh66IwLFwYKwL&pbid=40d9b99b682e4c5f990d970e4a0828cd

From alleged widespread racism to “Islamophobia” to “gender reassignment,” the way the American left currently portrays many of today’s top issues is not only wrong, says bestselling author David Kupelian, it is an attempt to forcibly replace reality with a series of coveted delusions – commonly called “narratives.”

Kupelian, whose latest book is “The Snapping of the American Mind,” made his comments during a fast-paced drive-time interview with popular San Francisco KSFO radio talker Brian Sussman.

“The statistics are simply mind-melting,” said Kupelian, referring to the astronomical levels of addiction, depression and family breakdown in today’s America, which he ties in his book to the left’s ongoing “fundamental transformation of America.” “One hundred and thirty million people are dependent on legal or illegal mind-altering substances. We’re not talking 130,000. This sounds like all the adults, almost – it’s like [we’re] a nation of addicts!”

As part of the progressive-left influence that Kupelian says is so adversely affecting the nation, Americans are being intimidated, bullied and seduced into accepting a whole slew of false “narratives” as though they represented reality, said Kupelian.

A “narrative,” he said, is just “a nice name for a … mass delusion.”

Kupelian rattled off a few examples of present-day false media narratives:

“Faisal Mohammad wasn’t motivated by jihad.”

“Bruce Jenner is a woman.”

Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, was a victim of racist police – even though it’s proven that he was a predator,” Kupelian added. “He was a punk on drugs who had just knocked off a convenience store and he tried to kill a cop, to grab his gun!” But “it doesn’t matter” to the left, said Kupelian. “You still hear about Ferguson and Michael Brown” as though the mythical “gentle giant” was a victim of trigger-happy, racist cops.

Another delusion-based narrative, said Kupelian, is that “Islam is a religion of peace. I have to tell you, I have about 100 family members who were killed by jihadists during the Armenian Genocide,” said Kupelian. “Islam has not been a religion of peace for the last 14 centuries. And it doesn’t show any signs of beginning now.”

“Where is this all coming from?” Kupelian asked rhetorically.

“We don’t live in a vacuum. … I’m saying we have a culture and a presidency in which basically we’re taught there is no God, there is no right and wrong and the biblical morals that this country did pretty well with for several centuries are oppressive and racist and we need to get rid of them!” He added, “There’s a side of us that feels like this is liberation, but there’s a price to pay. We’re paying the price now.”

Indeed, American politics has become so unhinged, he said, it is hard for normal Americans to even process what is happening.

“Hillary Clinton should be in prison, he noted, adding, “We have this socialist who, God bless Donald Trump, he referred to Bernie Sanders as a ‘communist maniac.'”

He then told Sussman: “I defy your listeners to go to the CPUSA website, Communist Party USA [cpusa.org] … Tell me the difference between the communist – forget socialism, the Communist Party USA – and the Democrat Party. Everything [on the CPUSA site] is ‘war on women,’ ‘racism,’ all the same stuff” over which today’s Democrat Party obsesses, he said.

The result of this political and moral insanity, Kupelian believes, is a kind of massive psychological strain imposed on Americans who find it difficult to live on a diet of lies.

In “The Snapping of the American Mind,” said Kupelian, “I’m connecting the dots between that big picture” of the Obama-left’s “fundamental transformation” of America “and the individual picture of the wretchedness and brokenness and pathology of the 130 million Americans that are dependent on [toxic] substances,” said Kupelian, who contends that leftist deception and intimidation “is actually driving good, unsuspecting Americans over the edge to depression, anger, mental illness, addiction, family breakdown – all the pathology and the wretchedness we see on the individual level which we don’t really attach to politics so much.”

Sussman, who frequently guest-hosts for Michael Savage on “The Savage Nation” and is the author of “Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda Will Dismantle America,” agreed with Kupelian.

“I hear that all the time!” he exclaimed.

As a talk show host, Sussman said he must often guard his listeners from everything that’s happening.

“If I just gave them the news of the day, people would be crashing their cars,” he joked. “Their minds are about to snap. ‘I can’t take this anymore.’ And I think you’re nailing it with this book.”

But it can be hard to break away from an all-encompassing media culture. Misspeaking for a moment, Kupelian said, “Bruce Jenner is still a woman,” when he meant to say Jenner is still a man.

Realizing his mistake, he laughed, “Oh no, they’ve gotten to me!”

Sussman chortled, “It’s gotten to you as well, your mind has snapped, David!”

Jokes aside, Kupelian’s message is deadly serious. And for those who actually want to help troubled people, he has simple advice – stick to reality. He affirmed the biological impossibility of “sex change” – or to use today’s euphemism, “gender reassignment” – citing the finding of the former psychiatrist-in-chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital that changing genders is “biologically impossible.”

“This is a controversial thing to say, especially in San Francisco,” Kupelian advised. “You cannot transition from one sex to the other. An adult male has about 37 trillion cells. Every one of them is permanently branded with Y [male] chromosomes.”

Kupelian said going along with transgenderism and other absurdities amounts to encouraging mental illness. As he put it, if a pathologically skinny anorexic woman thinks she is fat – a common syndrome among anorexics – “we don’t need to pretend she is fat.”

How can a person cope with living in a world of false narratives and dreamlike illusions? Kupelian argues the solution is simple:

“We need to wake up. We just need to wake up.”

He continued: “People tell me, ‘You know, this is a nightmare we’re living in under Obama.’ … It’s true, but there’s only one step away from a nightmare to being awake again. You just have to wake up. You have to put aside these sleepy delusions” that make us feel so comfortable in our dream world, he said.

In the end, Sussman told his listeners, “I want to promote this book heavily. David, great book, and it’s flying off the shelves as I would expect.”

EDITOR’S NOTE: David Kupelian’s “The Snapping of the American Mind” is being widely acclaimed for its startling and original analysis of what the progressive left is doing to America. Readers can get an autographed, hardcover copy of “The Snapping of the American Mind: Healing a Nation Broken by a Lawless Government and Godless Culture” at a special discount at the WND Superstore! Also, get Kupelian’s culture-war bestseller, “The Marketing of Evil” – now available in paperback – and the acclaimed sequel, “How Evil Works,” also in paperback – all available, autographed by the author, at the WND Superstore!

__________________________

© Copyright 1997-2015. All Rights Reserved. WND.com
Please honor copyright! Piracy hurts creators, devalues their works, and puts you and your employer at risk.

 

WND About Page

 

For 18 years, WND has been the world’s best-kept secret in Christian content and marketing. But the word is getting out.

 

There’s a reason WND.com has the largest reach of any Christian website on planet Earth.

 

There’s a reason WND’s weekly and monthly subscription magazines are growing—online and off—when other national news magazines are struggling.

 

There’s a reason WND Films have dominated the sales charts among faith releases since 2012.

 

There’s a reason the WND Superstore is among the largest online retailers in the world.

 

  • Are you in the business of reaching Christians, particularly in North America?

 

  • Are you a Christian book publisher or film producer?

 

  • Are you a Christian broadcaster?

 

  • Are you part of a Christian business that needs more attention and more customers?

 

If the answer to any of those questions is YES, you need to understand the opportunities WND offers you and your business.

 

WND is not your competitor. We’re your partner.

 

WND can best be explained by its mission statement:

 

WND is an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising journalism, seeking truth and justice and revitalizing the role of the free press as a guardian of liberty. We remain faithful to the traditional and central role of a free press in a free society — as a light exposing wrongdoing, corruption and abuse of power. We also seek to stimulate a free-and-open debate about the great moral and political ideas facing the world and to promote freedom and self-government by encouraging personal virtue and good character.