Plandemic II: inDOCTORnation film released…


Plandemic webpage photo

 

Plandemic One focused on the story of unrighteously much vilified Dr. Judy Mikovits being framed and maligned by Dr. Anthony Fauci and that relationship to today’s COVID-19. I posted the Bitchute version of Plandemic One on my blog due to Youtube and Big Tech censorship of truth.

 

Now thanks to News Target, I am posting the Brighteon video version of Plandemic II which can also be viewed and downloaded from the Plandemic website. (The embeds will show up on my Blogger blog, but on my WordPress version, you’ll have to click the Brighteon link to watch.)

 

Plandemic II focuses more on the corruption of Dr. Fauci, W.H.O. and the CDC. Overcome lying censorship by sharing copiously. FULL video of Plandemic II at the end of the News Target post – READ & WATCH. (Bonus info at the end of full video: Bill Gates – Jeffrey Epstein connection!)

 

JRH 8/23/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

*************************

Plandemic II: inDOCTORnation film released – here are the most damning outtakes that expose the criminal fraud of Fauci, the WHO and the CDC

 

Plandemic II – inDOCTORnation

 

By Mike Adams

08/19/2020

News Target

 

The bombshell new film, “Plandemic II: inDOCTORnation” was released yesterday, and this film unleashes bombshell after bombshell about Dr. Fauci, the CDC, the WHO, the corrupt vaccine industry, the NIH under Obama, and the whole pandemic scam that was deliberately engineered using a real virus to enslave humanity and earn billions in profits for Big Pharma.

 

Amazingly, the entire film has been released for free by its creator Mikki Willis, who you can find at PlandemicSeries.com (which appears to be under attack and not functioning at press time).

 

The full-length film is available at this link on Brighteon.com:
Brighteon.com/d6412bff-0421-4190-a7bf-3e5e1f52559d

 

This next link is usually more censorship-resistant for sharing:
Brlghteon.com/d6412bff-0421-4190-a7bf-3e5e1f52559d

 

Consider this film to be a “must-see” documentary that will absolutely blow your mind and forever change your understanding of the total corruption of the “science” establishment and the for-profit medical system. In essence, a group of evil people built this virus and released it onto the world so they could crush humanity and earn billions in profits. Even more shockingly, this isn’t the first time they’ve tried this.

 

See these amazing snippets / outtakes from the film

 

Another channel on Brighteon called “Sharing for Humanity” has been posting snippets from the film that are incredibly powerful. Each snippet shows a particular issue in just 2-3 minutes, making these “bite-sized” episodes to share with others. These are powerful snippets that you’ve got to see.

 

Here’s the link to the channel:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/sasho1

 

And here are a few of the snippets:

 

Brighteon VIDEO: Plandemic – How “big tech” control the narrative

 

Brighteon VIDEO: Plandemic – How the media targets Whistleblowers

 

Brighteon VIDEO: Plandemic – Who is Bill Gates and what erruption has he caused

 

Share these snippets everywhere, and share the full film. Humanity must awaken to these vaccine criminals and bioweapons engineers who are literally destroying human civilization for power and profit.

 

If we don’t wake up now, we will be exterminated en masse.

++++++++++++++++++++

Brighteon VIDEO: Plandemic II: Indoctornation (FULL MOVIE)

 

Posted by Natural News
Published at 2020-08-18

 

Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic. Plandemic II connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.

 

For more information, please visit https://www.plandemicseries.com

_____________________________

NewsTarget.com © 2020 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

 

Intro to Southwest’s ‘ECO-TERRORISM’


Edited by John R. Houk

Content from Southwest

Intro © November 26, 2019

 

There is often a thin line between Conspiracy Fact and Conspiracy Theory. It is often difficult which side of the fact and conjecture falls when it comes to national governments. WHY? The truth of the matter is Machiavellian secrets is how governments operate to proceed with perceived National Interests. I use the word “perceived” because perception is always in the hands of those in power.

 

In representative governments (face it – the last direct Democracy was ancient Athens which is where America’s Founders came to understand the concept of the Tyranny of the Majority) that power develops by elected governments often with power structures operated by an unelected bureaucracy whose loyalties can be mysterious and not necessarily to the benefit of the common good of those who elect government officials on a local or national (in the USA – Federal) level.

 

It is the bureaucratic level that secret agendas proceed that I believe someone with power has good intentions according to their political ideology, BUT can nefarious results that the people who vote would not view with favor – no matter the voting-people’s political ideology.

 

It is my sense that is what pseudonymous Southwest is trying to decipher from available facts below. Unfortunately the process of deciphering leads to one’s best guess. A guess one would call a Conspiracy Theory of conjecture while another would view the preponderance of facts that leads to a logical outcome.

 

On my part I have a sense theories could quite possibly collide with logical outcomes.

 

Southwest put together a series of posts on the USA.Life social platform he divided between A – D on what he views as Eco-Terrorism perpetrated by governments with a close look at the U.S. government. I think you will be fascinated with his point of view which looks at Climate control but NOT through the lens of Climate Change political Leftists. I’ll let you consider who is culpable on the Left and/or the Right for potential human manufactured natural disasters resulting from mysterious bureaucratic agendas. A good guess there is some culpability from both the Left and the Right.

 

The question then arises: Will voters ever be able to restrain unelected bureaucrats in both civilian government and military-industrial complex?

 

JRH 11/26/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**************************

ECO-TERRORISM:
NATURAL DISASTERS- HOW NATURAL ARE THEY?

 

By Southwest on USA.Life

Shared 11/24/19

 

This is a subject dear to most of us: the lives that are being lost due to hurricanes that had been created and/or energized by the Department of Defense and H.A.A.R.P. [Blog Editor: the acronym to High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (Wikipedia) – (GlobalResearch.ca)] through Ionospheric Heaters, needles, radio waves etc. [Blog Editor: In the links provided above you should note that official military management of H.A.A.R.P. ended in 2014, BUT the program continues under the management of the University of Alaska (Fairbanks). As in military management days, Conspiracy Theorists aren’t buying UAF management disclaimers that no nefarious military experiments are occurring. Whether you buy into the conspiracies partially, wholly or not at all; one thing that should pique your attention that H.A.A.R.P. in the past did receive military research & development funding from D.A.R.P.A. the folks that are exempt from any public disclosures due to the utmost Classified protections.]

The U.S. Army, Navy, Weather Bureau, and General Electric scientists seeded the first tropical storm on October 13, 1947 [ZeroHedge 10/10/2017 – 21:50] with 180 pounds of dry ice dropped by aircraft and the Cape Sable hurricane formed. PROJECT CIRRUS [The Black Vault (3/26/15) & History of Project Cirrus – 122 pg PDF from GE Research Laboratory (7-1952)] WAS THE FIRST hurricane Cloud Seeding experiment project. Successful.

Space-Weather Modification technology has advanced to the point where our own environment is now being used as a weapon, and the stakes could not be any higher. The history of weather modification used as a weapon is now exposed in the following series of scientific articles, Space Weather Modification timeline and a map of currently operational Ionospheric Heaters [HAARP and the Sky Heaters; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; originally published 8/21/12 – Updated 11/14/18 AND Christopher Fontenot: Ionospheric Heaters, Waves from Alfven to ELF; By Crazz Files author- Adam; The Crazz Files; 12/19/16]. It started with Operation Popeye: Weather warfare on Vietnam March 20, 1967 to July 5 1972 [Youtube VIDEO (2:47): Operation Popeye – Weather Warfare in Vietnam (9/21/11) AND The Secret Weather Manipulation Program of the Vietnam War; By Matt Novak; PaleoFuthure.Gizmodo.com; 3/5/15 4:50 PM AND 274. Memorandum From the Deputy Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs (Kohler) to Secretary of State Rusk (Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXVIII, Laos); History.State.gov; 1/13/1967].

When upper atmospheric nuclear explosions were banned back in the 1950’s, the U.S. military, still hell bent on replacing our fickle ionosphere with something more reliable, decided to dump millions of needles in space [Youtube VIDEO (16:51 with a few ads): That Time the U.S. Military Launched a Half a Billion Needles to Space for Reasons… (11/3/19) AND The Forgotten Cold War Plan That Put a Ring of Copper Around the Earth; By Joe Hanson; Wired; 8/13/13 9:30 am AND Space needles (PDF); MIT – Lincoln Laboratory; 5/2018].

To this day millions of needles can be found floating in space or buried in ice at our poles. Next, the military began using sounding rockets and satellites to dump [Aluminum, Barium, and Chemtrails Explained – JUST THE FACTS; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; Published 3/15/15 – “Uploaded:” 6/9/18 (search-scroll to “dumped in space to study”) AND  Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed; Posted by Gordon; TapNewsWire.com; 7/29/17 8:28 am (search-scroll to “create heavy ion clouds in space by dumping”) AND Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project; By Peter A. Kirby; Activist Post; 2/17/15] Barium, Strontium, and Sulfur Hexafluoride into our ionosphere.

 

Military radio technicians could heat these chemical released in space with the ionospheric heater at Arecibo, Puerto Rico and “see” our ionosphere. Today, the top ionospheric heater worldwide HAARP fires electromagnetic missiles into our Van Allen belts and scrapes out radiation using the “Christofilos Effect” [Interesting explanation via Youtube VIDEO (6:38): What is CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT? What does CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT mean? CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT meaning (1/27/17)] learned back in the 1950’s nuclear blasts (which refers to trapping energy).

Dubbed “radiation belt remediation” ionospheric heaters are sold to politicians and to the public as a backup plan for Solar Flares or High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse attacks, however foreign governments are very concerned about the military capabilities of these ionospheric heaters, with the Russian government going as far as to say HAARP could “have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions.” [RUSSIA, CHINA, AND THOSE IONOSPHERIC HEATERS AND OTHER STUFF: PART ONE and PART TWO; By Joseph P. Farrell; Giza Death Star; 12/20/18]

The U.S. continues to carry out large-scale scientific experiments under the HAARP program, and not controlled by the global community. Those weapons are capable of breaking radio communication lines and equipment installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious accidents in electricity networks and in oil and gas pipelines and have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions, the deputies said. They demanded that an international ban be put on such large-scale geophysical experiments. The appeal, signed by 90 deputies, has been sent to President Vladimir Putin, to the United Nations and other international organizations, to the parliaments and leaders of the UN member countries, to the scientific public and to mass media outlets. [Blog Editor: In full disclosure as an American Patriot I am suspicious of anything ran by the globalists of the UN, EU or Putin’s Russia.]

Despite these dire warnings, the practice of heating chemical releases in space is just “a conspiracy theory.”

To make it short, the Defense Department is selling the benefits of those attacks without telling that they are being used to create and/or to maximize the power of earthquakes, Tsunamis and more.

This eco-terrorism is a direct cause of the magnitude of present earthquakes, volcanos, mental disorders and suicide, to name a few of the consequences of this attack, but it is not done randomly, at least not at this moment.

Weather is unnaturally severe because of unnatural modification.

 

[Blog Editor: The above source links are by this Blog Editor. Southwest provides his own source link contributions below which I will distinguish from any additions of my own.]

 

Many believe that Agenda 21 is the goal and to place the remaining population in FEMA camps under the control of the UN [Blog Editor: A scenario I found referencing Agenda 21, FEMA Camps and Depopulation: Agenda 21- Codex- Fema Camps 80% Depopulation = New World Order (video); By Medeea Greere; AMG-News.com; 11/5/19 – You judge]. Whatever the goal may be, there’s no justification to create tornados and earthquakes [Blog Editor: Southwest link on creating tornadoes and earthquakes – HAARP and the Sky Heaters; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; Published 8/21/12 – Updated 11/14/18].

“The list of unintended consequences of human manipulation of natural systems is long: concrete jungles creating urban heat islands, vast oceanic dead zones resulting from fertilizer use on inland agricultural fields, and intentionally introduced species, such as the cane toad in Australia, that then wreak havoc on ecosystems, among others. Whether the idea is to mimic a volcano’s cooling impact on climate by continuously pumping sulfates into the stratosphere or to brighten clouds via crewless ships spewing water vapor, possible problems range from shutting down rainfall in certain regions to unilateral declarations of war.” [Southwest quoting – What Is Geoengineering and Why Is It Considered a Climate Change Solution? By David Biello; Scientific American; 4/6/10]

 

As clearly stated, human manipulation of weather is unjust, unnatural, and just wrong! Could this be a way for government to subdue a population? It is unbearable to think about, yet proven by evidence that major hurricanes such as Katrina were caused by weather modification.

 

[Blog Editor: Southwest messaged the link http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=81991 on 11/25 as a part of his weather manipulation inquiry. Below is an excerpt:]

 

Hurricane Harvey: A Geoengineered Superstorm Targets Texas—WHY?

Why Southeast Texas? Why now?

 

Hurricane Harvey weather map

Notice how Harvey was aiming right for the capital city of Austin.

 

By SOTN

August 27, 2017

State of the Nation

 

Like all geoengineered storms fabricated by the NWO globalist cabal, Hurricane Harvey was fastidiously manufactured and directed at Texas.  The following video breaks it all down: Hurricane Harvey Targeting Texas (Video)

 

Because this meteorological fact is now self-evident, the most important question that can be asked (and answered) is “Why has the great state of Texas been targeted yet again?” The analysis that follows explains the real purpose(s) behind Hurricane Harvey.

 

[SOTN] Editor’s Note: The link below provides a detailed exposé that was previously published by SOTN about the weather wars waged against Texas in the past.  This post contains vital background material which informs the present predicament.

 

TEXAS FLOODS: A Geoengineered Weather Event Using Chemtrails And HAARP

 

Another Texas Deluge

 

First, it’s important to note that this superstorm is still very much in progress.  Some of the best weather forecast models have predicted up to 40 inches of rain in the most affected areas over the coming days.

 

As is often the case, this hurricane is not just about a calamitous wind-damaging event as much as it was geoengineered to be a mega rain-dumper.  Catastrophic winds typically limit their fury mainly to the coastlines, although they can cut a swath of great destruction that follows the path of the eye wall.

 

Continuously falling rains, on the other hand, can cause an apocalyptic deluge that paralyzes major metro areas like Corpus Christi and Houston.  These slow-motion rain events and subsequent flooding always prove to be the worst of the one-two punch packed by many hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.

 

Hurricane Harvey: Fears of flash floods as 40 inches of rain hit Texas – latest updates

 

When the damage caused by Hurricane Harvey is finally assessed, it will likely prove to be one of the worst manmade disasters in Texas history.  Therefore, it behooves investigators to ascertain why the geoengineers were ordered to target Texas with such a cataclysmic storm.

 

READ THE REST

 

This page does a good job of Illustrating multiple United States patents involving weather modification projects. Also on this page is the “hurricane modification workshop”, a textbook of information on how to create, enhance, and modify weather systems.

 

The following is a page from
https://climateviewer.com/2013/11/08/hurricane-hacking-the-department-of-homeland-security-enters-the-weather-modification-business/

 

Hurricane Hacking: The Department of Homeland Security enters the weather modification business

DHS working on steering hurricanes with Bill Gates and top geoengineering scientists.

 

By James Franklin Lee Jr.

Published · Friday, Nov 8, 2013

ClimateViewer.com

 

nasa-grip-genesis-and-rapid-intensification-processes – DHS logo

 

Did you know? The good ol’ boys at the DHS are working on steering hurricanes and some big names in the Geoengineering world are getting in on the mix. Check out the following timeline to see how it all went down, then read the DHS report on the hurricane hacking workshop.

 

Timeline

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Patent App-20090177569 Storm Protection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIDEO: DHS Hurricane Modification Workshop, Weather Modification Association Conference 2008

 

 

[Posted by Jim Lee

20.1K subscribers

Reference Documents: https://climateviewer.com/2013/11/08/hurricane-hacking-the-department-of-homeland-security-enters-the-weather-modification-business/

The Department of Homeland Security asked NOAA/ESRL in Boulder to organize a workshop on possible new scientific theory and approaches to hurricane modification in February, 2008. Nearly two dozen scientists from around the world attended and there were a number of hypotheses and new ideas presented. We shall summarize the workshop results here and the development of the new DHS-funded HAMP Program that arose from the Workshop. https://ams.confex.com/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_168336.htm

MORE TO READ]

 

I now present the DHS workshop report (videos and a few images added by Jim Lee): READ THE REST

+++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_____________________________

Intro to Southwest’s ‘ECO-TERRORISM’

Edited by John R. Houk

Content from Southwest

Intro © November 26, 2019

________________________

ECO-TERRORISM:
NATURAL DISASTERS- HOW NATURAL ARE THEY?

 

© Southwest

 

Edited by John R. Houk

All text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor. Most source links are by the Editor except where indicated by Southwest.

 

The spiraling rabbit hole of the Seth Rich Murder – With George Webb


I ran into a John B. Wells video on Youtube entitled “The spiraling rabbit hole of the Seth Rich Murder – With George Webb”. I am convinced that the murder of Seth Rich is a part of a huge Leftist cover-up to impugn President Donald Trump. And by impugning I don’t mean President Trump had anything to do with the Rich murder, but I do mean that Rich exposed the Democratic Party and the Crooked Hillary campaign to voter manipulation and political corruption.

 

And so, the Wells one-hour and twenty-four-minute video with Seth Rich caught my attention. I listened to 37-minutes of the quite fascinating video I didn’t really catch a lot of details on the Seth Rich murder, but I could tell George Webb was leading up to it. I had to quit listening because I moved on to other obligations.

 

The part I did listen to laid the foundation of a Deep State cabal of Clinton string pulling to perpetuate a Leftist agenda for America in the shadows of government operation.

 

Ergo, I highly recommend watching-listening to the Wells video even if you must go back a few times to complete just as I am going to do.

 

JRH 6/11/17

Please Support NCCR

*************

VIDEO: The spiraling rabbit hole of the Seth Rich Murder – With George Webb

 

Posted by John B. Wells

Published on Jun 6, 2017

 

Episode 751 – George Webb, Steven Aukstakalnis & Joseph Meyer

Full Episode: https://caravantomidnight.com/episode-751-george-webb-steven-aukstakalnis-joseph-meyer/?doing_wp_cron=1497204005.6733939647674560546875

In this edition we welcome back George Webb

Webb starts us off disclosing findings from the Seth Rich murder in spiraling rabbit hole format.

Subscribe to the John B Wells show on Caravan to Midnight today for the truth behind the headlines – Only $5 per month.

We are sensitive to the expectations of our audience and remain faithful to our mandate to provide educational, cultural and informational programs independent of commercial obligations or influence.

http://caravantomidnight.com/ctm-member-subscription-page/

Former Host of Coast To Coast AM John B Wells is now in control on Caravan To Midnight & Ark Midnight

https://caravantomidnight.com/your-host/

 

Newbill on Conspiracy, Counterjihad and Corruption


bho-terrorism-no-negotiation-but-finance

Here are some collected emails from Tony Newbill examining national/global conspiracies, Counterjihad issues that involves U.S. government collusion (Hello Barack & Crooked Hillary) and government corruption.

 

JRH 9/23/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

Newbill on Conspiracy, Counterjihad and Corruption

Tony Newbill

Posted on September 23, 2016

 

The Voters need to ask: How is the Government projecting a 260 million population reduction in the USA by 2025?

8/23/2016 11:48 PM

 

And I would Screen shot this site and save this information!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

http://www.deagel.com/country/United-States-of-America_c0001.aspx

 

Forecast 2025 —                                                         — Rank — %

 

Population:                        61 million                         — 19    —     0.9

Density:                           6 inhabitants / sq. km. – 170 –  12.2

Gross Domestic Product:  $949 billion                    — 11 —       1.7

GDP per capita:                 $15,517                           — 49 —     192 

Purchase Power Parity:   $10,345                          — 78 —      111 

Military Budget:                $8.2 billion                   — 22 —           0.9

 

READ ENTIRETY (Deagel United States of America [Chart])

 

+++

This is coming to the USA if Hillary Clinton gets elected POTUS

8/24/2016 8:52 AM

 

This is coming to the USA if Hillary Clinton gets elected POTUS, because the Muslim Brotherhood’s Insider aid to Clinton wants this country for themselves and ISIS was created by the Insiders in our DoD!!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/175105516198463/permalink/293511281024552/?comment_id=293652361010444&notif_t=group_comment_reply&notif_id=1472045897637872

 

Tommy Tunes Reality Check: Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria

 

VIDEO: Reality Check: Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1aDciHCejA

 

Posted by Ben Swann

Published on Nov 19, 2015

 

There is so much debate over how the U.S. and other nations will stop ISIS but can these leaders be trusted? Ben Swann exposes secret DOD documents that prove the U.S. wanted ISIS to emerge in Syria.

 

+++

OK so how do we know if these LOST TAXPAYER FUNDS ….

8/24/2016 10:20 AM

 

OK, so how do we know if these LOST TAXPAYER FUNDS were not used in bribes to buy U.S. and NATO Positions within Middle Eastern countries? And how do we know or not if the $400 million [Blog Editor Update: $1.7 Billion] recently given to Iran has not went to fund our enemies. Plus, as the funds were allocated how much of a cut did people involved in these transactions pocket?????

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/pentagon-sloppy-bookkeeping-means-6-091500172.html

 

Pentagon’s Sloppy Bookkeeping Means $6.5 Trillion Can’t Pass an Audit

 

The Defense Department over the years has been notorious for its lax accounting practices. The Pentagon has never completed an audit of how they actually spend the trillions of dollars on wars, equipment, personnel, housing, healthcare and procurements.

 

An increasingly impatient Congress has demanded that the Army achieve “audit readiness” for the first time by Sept. 30, 2017, so that lawmakers can get a better handle on military spending. But Pentagon watchdogs think that may be mission impossible, and for good reason.

 

A Department of Defense inspector general’s report released last week offered a jaw-dropping insight into just how bad the military’s auditing system is.

 

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service, the behemoth Indianapolis-based agency that provides finance and accounting services for the Pentagon’s civilian and military members, could not provide adequate documentation for $6.5 trillion worth of year-end adjustments to Army general fund transactions and data.

 

The DFAS has the sole responsibility for paying all DOD military and personnel, retirees and annuitants, along with Pentagon contractors and vendors. The agency is also in charge of electronic government initiatives, including within the Executive Office of the President, the Department of Energy and the Departing of Veterans Affairs.

 

There’s nothing in the new IG’s report to suggest that anyone has misplaced or absconded with large sums of money. Rather, the agency has done an incompetent job of providing written authorization for every one of their transactions – so-called “journal vouchers” that READ THE REST (Pentagon’s Sloppy Bookkeeping Means $6.5 Trillion Can’t Pass an Audit; By The Fiscal Times; Yahoo Finance; 7/31/16)

 

+++

This tells us why they are looking at depopulation of the planet

8/24/2016 12:34 PM

 

http://energyskeptic.com/

 

[Blog Editor: It appears to me the above link is updated on a continuous basis. I’ll cross post an excerpt from the most recent update as of me taking a look]

 

Peak Energy & Resources, Climate Change, and the Preservation of Knowledge

 

Methane hydrate apocalypse? Maybe not…

Posted on September 20, 2016 by energyskeptic

 

[ I don’t think there’s enough evidence yet to decide for sure there won’t be a gas hydrate apocalypse, but here’s some evidence that this might not happen. Even Benton, who wrote “When Life Nearly Died” didn’t pin the mass murderer of the Permian extinction on gas hydrates.

 

I’ve also read Peter Ward’s “Under a Green Sky” and many other books and peer-reviewed articles, and will continue to try to follow the mystery of extinction events and who the mass murderers were.

 

Until then, here are some of the articles I’ve run across that cast some doubt on this being a sure thing, though clearly more research needs to be done.

 

There’s also the hope that peak oil, which makes all other resources available, including coal, natural gas and oil itself, prevent us from going extinct as energy reduces population back to about 1 billion or so (whatever it was before fossil fuels replaced wood and muscle power) and we READ THE REST

 

http://www.peakprosperity.com/podcast/100873/alice-friedemann-when-trucks-stop-running

 

Alice Friedemann is a transportation expert sounding the alarm on the unsustainable nature of our modern trucking system, which is critical for delivering goods where they need to be, when they need to be, in our just-in-time economy.

 

The world’s trucking fleet is remarkably dependent on petroleum and, for a number of reasons she outlines in this interview, is not feasibly able to shift over to electricity or other alternative fuels.

 

To warn of the risks and consequences of a collapse in trucking, she founded EnergySkeptic.com and authored the book When The Trucks Stop Running: Energy and the Future of Transportation. And while unlikely, her projected aftermath of a sudden complete shutdown of the trucking fleet is sobering, revealing just how dependent we are:

 

Within a week, in roughly this order, grocery stores would be out of dairy and other items that are delivered many times a day. And by the week, the shelves would be empty.

Hospitals, pharmacies, factories, and many other businesses also get several deliveries a day, and they’d be running out of stuff the first day.

And the second day, there’s be panic and hoarding. And restaurants, pharmacies would close. ATM’s would be out of money. Construction would stop. There’d be increasing layoffs. Increasing enormous amounts of trash not getting picked up, 685,000 tons a day. Service stations would be closed. Very few people would be working. And the livestock would start to be hungry from lack of feed deliveries.

Then within two weeks, clean water supplies would run out. Within four weeks to eight weeks, there wouldn’t be coal delivered to power plants and electricity would start shutting down. And when that happened, about a quarter of our pipelines use electricity, and so natural gas plants wouldn’t be fed natural gas and they’d start shutting down.

It’s a big interdependent system. That’s part of the problem. It’s like Liebig’s Law of the Minimum. A plant needs about 20 READ OR LISTEN TO THE REST (Alice Friedemann: When The Trucks Stop Running: The modern trucking fleet is living on borrowed time; By Adam Taggart; Peak Prosperity; 8/21/16 11:59 AM)

 

+++

Here is the Stealth from within……

8/26/2016 3:35 PM

 

http://www.freedompost.org/islam/deception/civilization-jihad-aka-stealth-jihad.html

 

Civilization Jihad aka Stealth Jihad

 

  1. Origins of Civilization Jihad (Stealth Jihad)

 

August 2004, an alert Maryland Transportation Authority Police officer observed a woman wearing traditional Islamic garb videotaping the support structures of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, and conducted a traffic stop. The driver was Ismail Elbarasse and detained on an outstanding material witness warrant issued in Chicago in connection with fundraising for Hamas. In the basement of his home in Annandale, VA, a hidden sub-basement was found, containing 80 banker boxes of the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. One of the most important of these documents was the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan for the United States and was entitled, “An Explanatory Memorandum On The General Strategic Goal For The Group In North America” (English version or Arabic version), written in May 1991 primarily by Mohamed Akram, a former director of the United Association of Studies and Research (UASR), a Hamas front that was based in Northern Virginia from 1991 to 2004. UASR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation terrorist finance trial case that this document was entered into evidence, was headed by Ahmed Yousef who now serves as political advisor to head of Hamas in Gaza, Ismail Haniya.

 

VIDEO: Muslim Brotherhood’s plan & Obama connection exposed (1:29:54)

 

READ THE REST (Civilization Jihad aka Stealth Jihad; Freedom Post)

 

+++

Sharia Law is Totalitarianism!!!!!!!!!

8/28/2016 12:20 PM  

 

LOOK how they are Taking over with TAXPAYER MONEY US Education POLICY!!!!!!!!

 

Film Warns of Education Caliphate

Documentary filmmaker goes in depth on the Gulen Movement charter schools in America

https://mountainrepublic.net/2016/08/28/film-warns-of-education-caliphate/#comment-20012

 

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/W6E8rVWlMuM

 

Posted by The Alex Jones Channel

Published on Aug 26, 2016

What if the Church of Scientology was able to get $500 MILLION PER YEAR in taxpayer money to educate children? That’s what an Islamic cult, the Gulen Movement, gets now. Filmmaker Mark Hall talks about his documentary, “Killing Ed”, that exposes crony capitalism and corruption in Charter Schools and the slander & censorship it has faced.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with READ THE REST

 

 

What if the Church of Scientology was able to get $500 MILLION PER YEAR in taxpayer money to educate children?

 

That’s what an Islamic cult, the Gulen Movement, gets now.

 

Filmmaker Mark Hall talks about his documentary, “Killing Ed,” that exposes crony capitalism and corruption in Charter Schools, and the slander and censorship it has faced.

 

VIDEO: Film Exposes Islamic Takeover Of US Schools

 

Posted by The Alex Jones Channel

Published on Aug 26, 2016

The Islamic State may be more subtle in America than in Syria, using money to gain influence, establish schools and brainwash the next generation.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re READ THE REST

 

(Film Warns of Education Caliphate; By Mountain Republic; 8/28/16)

 

And check this CRAZY OUT!!!!!!    https://www.facebook.com/OfficialBritainFirst/videos/1115117425300184/

 

Britain First

August 28 at 8:06am

 

SHOCKING: Muslim blood RITUAL! coming to a street NEAR YOU!

 

For more explosive content like this please like Britain First

 

VIDEO: SHOCKING- Muslim blood RITUAL- coming to a street NEAR YOU

 

And this is NOT Constitutional either!!!!  Stated multiple Times (Totalitarian) is against the structures of America, and against its governing system. These people that support Totalitarianism are NOT to be permitted entry to the United States :: See page 185 Chapter 2 section 212 Article (28) subpart (D)…:

 

 http://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/66%20stat%20163.pdf

public-law-414-june-27-1952-pg-185-chapter-2-section-212-article-28-subpart-d

This is what we will get with Hillary Clinton as POTUS and Mr. Trump needs to POUND on this!!!!!! The Democrats have become totalitarian in their sense of how the USA should be, so they can implement their Climate Change Anti-Human restrictive regulatory ambitions. Mr. Trump needs to HOUND the AIRWAVES with this debate!!!!!!!!!  

 

Here is a segment of the FrontPageMag story on Hillary is trying to bring Sharia Law and the US Constitution together, oh my!!!!

 

  “As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton affirmed the Obama Administration’s support for this campaign on July 15, 2011, when she gave an address on the freedom of speech at an OIC [i.e. Organization of Islamic Cooperation] conference on Combating Religious Intolerance.

 

“Together,” she said, “we have begun to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and we are pursuing a new approach.”

 

But how could both be protected? Ihsanoglu [Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu] offered the answer: criminalizing what he considered to be hatred and incitement to violence. “We cannot and must not ignore the implications of hate speech and incitement of discrimination and violence.” But in restricting the freedom of speech, Clinton had a First Amendment to deal with, and so in place of legal restrictions on criticizing Islam, she suggested “old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” She held a lengthy closed-door meeting with Ihsanoglu in December 2011 to facilitate the adoption of measures that would advance the OIC’s anti-free speech agenda, which amounted to an attempt to impose Sharia blasphemy laws upon the West. But what agreements she and Ihsanoglu made, if any, have never been disclosed. Hillary’s contact with Ihsanoglu was initiated by Gulen’s associate Ozkok. Read more at these links:

 

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263536/hillarys-imam-robert-spencer 

 

We need to POUND this HOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Lots or material on this ANTI-American Topic:

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/10/for-the-left-totalitarianism-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/ 

 

I like to think of myself as a pioneer in warning about the rise of the New Totalitarianism in America, which is really not much different than the old totalitarianism. The most important difference is that the new breed is better at hypnotizing itself into thinking they’re good-hearted, compassionate souls who just want the best for everyone… except, of course, the dissenters they grind beneath their jackboots.

 

 

Push them harder, and they’ll claim their seething hatred for the Christian bakers – their totalitarian urge to use the power of the State to personally destroy these innocent people – isn’t a black mark against their “compassion” and “tolerance,” because those bakers aren’t really people at all, at least not in the same sense that loving gay couples who demand cakes for READ THE REST (For the Left, Totalitarianism Is a Feature, Not a Bug; By JOHN HAYWARD; Breitbart; 7/10/15)

 

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/07/08/examples_of_the_new_totalitarianism

 

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

 

RUSH: Now I want to go back to the rest of the new totalitarian piece and give you some examples of it.  And it has been suggested to me that I ask all of you to start paying attention to examples of this that you encounter. Not necessarily things that happen to you, but things that you see in the news, maybe where you live or just anywhere.  Just make a note of it, and become aware of it.  It’s one thing to have this new totalitarianism described to you.  By the way, it’s not new.  The real brilliance of this piece is like Angelo Codevilla’s piece on the ruling class.

 

 

It just infuriates them because the key element of totalitarianism, not only will you be defeated by them, but in time you will love them, and you will agree with them, and you will support them, and you will actively join them.  And you will not disagree.  That is what we are in the midst of seeing. …

 

 

“For a fair number of people in what’s supposed to be a democracy, ‘winning’ in any normal political sense simply isn’t enough. They are not really trying to capture something as pedestrian as political equality, nor are they satisfied if they get it.” They claim that’s what they’re about.  Equality.  They’re not about equality at all.  They’re about total domination.

 

 

… That’s why the Republicans have fallen into a huge trap on all of this.  Bipartisanship.  They are not bipartisan.  Somebody give me an example of left-wing bipartisanship.  They don’t even define it the way we do.  Bipartisanship, as they define it, as in we cave on our core beliefs and agree with them.  That is bipartisanship.  There is no compromise.

 

 

So, folks, it’s an all-out assault on the criminal justice system and an attempt, which will not stop, to have the entire Grand Jury system found corrupt, and if they could get rid of it. And why?  Because they didn’t get the result.  They did not prevail.  There are people who disagree with them, and that will not be tolerated.  People who disagree with them, whether they are high judges, whether they are prosecutors, whether they are average ordinary every day citizens, it will not be tolerated.

 

 

“A new document reveals that the Department of Justice, the IRS, and the FBI colluded to prosecute Barack Obama opponents.”  This is from Judicial Watch.  Involves Lois Lerner.  Just the headlines, folks: “New Docs Reveal DOJ, IRS, and FBI Colluding to Prosecute Obama Opponents.” These are the 501(c)(3)s that the conservative fundraising group is asking for tax-exempt status.  Judicial Watch has found evidence that the DOJ, the IRS, the FBI were colluding to prosecute them out of existence.

 

END TRANSCRIPT READ ENTIRETY (Examples of the New Totalitarianism; Transcript of Rush Limbaugh Show; 7/8/15)

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

Tony Newbill Observations on Comey/Clinton


Hillary-Lynch-Comey-BHO White House Corruption

Tony Newbill (pseudonym) has some interesting insight on FBI Director Comey’s announcement that his FBI Office IS NOT recommending an indictment against Crooked Hillary Clinton. The insight came as two comments made to the NCCR cross post of “Analysis of FBI Directors Hearing with Congress”.

 

Newbill sees a leftist ruling class held to a different standard of laws than the regular Joe American thus this ruling class is fracturing American society inculcating distrust as a norm in society. Ergo this distrust leads to divisiveness in society.

 

JRH 7/10/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Tony Newbill Observations on Comey/Clinton

Posted from NCCR Comment Section: 7/10/16

 

n3angus [aka Tony Newbill]

July 8, 2016 at 10:58 AM

 

Man what a Mess this country is getting in, and it could be said it stems from corruption within the Judicial system where it looks like there are 2 sets of laws that the ruling class use for themselves and then the civilian laws, like this reads: http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/comey-has-long-history-of-clinton-related-cases/!

 

FBI Director James Comey

FBI Director James Comey

 

NEW YORK – FBI Director James Comey has a long history of involvement in Department of Justice actions that arguably ended up favorable to the Clintons.

 

In 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration officials who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack.

 

On Tuesday, Comey announced that despite evidence of “extreme negligence by Hillary Clinton and her top aides regarding the handling of classified information through a private email server, the FBI would not refer criminal charges to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Justice Department.

 

Curiously, Berger, Lynch and Cheryl Mills all worked as partners in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson, which prepared tax returns for the Clintons and did patent work for a software firm that played a role in the private email server Hillary Clinton used when she was secretary of state.

 

With Hillary making another run for president, don’t get caught up in the lies and spin! In “Hillary Unhinged: In Her Own Words,” find out who the true Hillary is with this raw and humorous collection of quotes that pitilessly underscores her hypocrisy

 

Lynch and Comey both served as U.S. attorney in New York, Lynch for the Eastern District of New York, and Comey for the Southern District of New York. They crossed paths in the investigation of HSBC bank, which avoided criminal charges in a massive money-laundering scandal for which the bank paid a $1.9 billion fine.

 

After Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself in the Valerie Plame affair in 2004, Comey appointed as special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who ended up convicting “Scooter” Libby, a top aide to then Vice President Dick Cheney, of perjury and obstruction of justice. The charge was based on the accusations of Plame and her former ambassador husband, Joe Wilson – both partisan supporters of Bill and Hillary Clinton – that Libby outed her as a CIA agent.

 

New York Times reporter Judith Miller’s 2015 memoir strongly suggests Fitzgerald improperly manipulated testimony and withheld crucial evidence in obtaining a conviction against Libby in his 2007 trial.

 

Prosecutor in Berger case

 

As deputy attorney general, Comey was involved in the investigation of Berger, as Fox News reported in 2004

 
Berger at that time was under criminal investigation by the Justice Department for removing from the National Archives various classified documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission investigating the 9/11 terror attacks and for removing handwritten notes he made while reviewing the documents.

 

The New York Times reported in 2005 that Republican leaders speculated Berger removed the documents from the National Archives because he was trying to conceal material that could be damaging to the Clinton administration.

 
There is no evidence Comey’s investigation for the Justice Department made any attempt to determine if anyone affiliated with the Clinton White House prompted Berger or coordinated with him in the decision to remove the classified documents.

 
Various statements Comey made about Berger’s mishandling of classified documents bear comparison to his comments regarding Hillary Clinton’s email server.

 

In 2004, Fox News noted Comey told reporters he could not comment on the Berger investigation but did address the general issue of mishandling classified documents.

 

“As a general matter, we take issues of classified information very seriously,” Comey said in response to a reporter’s question.

 

 

On April 1, 2005, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of intentionally removing documents from the National Archives and destroying some of them. He was fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and two years of probation. Also, his national security license was stripped for two years.

 

Messages found stored on Clinton’s private email server show that Berger – a convicted thief of classified documents – had been advising Clinton while she served as secretary of state and had access to emails containing classified information.

 

For example, READ ENTIRETY (COMEY HAS LONG HISTORY OF CASES ENDING FAVORABLE TO CLINTONS: In Berger probe said ‘we take issues of classified information very seriously; By JEROME R. CORSI; WND; 7/7/16)

 

n3angus

July 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM

 

When our Society sees a Ruling class that is not held to the same standards as We the People are, just like how the ruling class gets healthcare that’s not the same as what the Society is now mandated to buy, and when the same standards like what we have been seeing regarding the Clinton Network with nothing being done about it, it creates a Culture of Disrespect to evolve within the Society. Then Society starts to breakdown and divide on itself!!!!

 
And it could be that we are seeing this going on behind the scenes. Remember this: “Top Down, Bottom Up, Inside-out”??????

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13smJ9IVjlM

 

VIDEO: Progressive Chaos: Top-Down Bottom-Up, Inside-Out!

 

Posted by GusDeSoto

Uploaded on Feb 18, 2011

 

2/18/2011 – After the chaos and unrest in Europe, then in the Middle East, just as Glenn Beck predicted, the TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM UP and INSIDE OUT strategy talked about by Van Jones is coming to pass. Along with Jones’ incit[e]ment to get liberal progressive[s] to act on his model, there have been stories published and written by Frances Fox Piven, again, inciting people to get mad at the government, in a sense, inciting unrest and riots, due in part to the economic conditions of our nation. This is what one would consider a well-orchestrated “insurrection” by the mainstream media, unions and even the government. How will it end?

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Brackets indicate Editor insertions

 

© Tony Newbill

FBI: Yes, Queen Hillary Broke The Law. No, She Won’t Be Prosecuted.


Hillary Short Scandal List

Hillary lies – people died. The Federal Bureau of Investigation says, Don’t worry about it, we cleared the crook to run for POTUS.

 

Here’s an interesting note I heard on Fox News. Did you realize there were two investigations underway? Director Comey gives Crooked Hillary a pass on her illegal email at her private home, but she and other Clintons are still under investigation for receiving suspicious donations from foreign entities as compensation for nefarious political favors.

Clinton Foundation Foreign Donors

JRH 7/5/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************

FBI: Yes, Queen Hillary Broke The Law. No, She Won’t Be Prosecuted.

 

By BEN SHAPIRO

JULY 5, 2016

Daily Wire

Hillary gets away with lying

On July 4, 1776, the United States announced its independence from Great Britain based on the key principle of rule of law.

 

On July 5, 2016, the United States said, “F*** it. I’m With Hillary!”

 

Just days after the Attorney General of the United States Loretta Lynch held a secret meeting aboard a plane with former President Bill Clinton – whose wife was under FBI investigation; just the day after Hillary leaked that she’d want Lynch for her own administration; just hours after the President of the United States Barack Obama flew Hillary – still under FBI investigation – down to North Carolina on Air Force One; just two hours before Obama was to open his campaign on behalf of Hillary Clinton, FBI Director James Comey announced that while Hillary Clinton had clearly engaged in criminal activity worthy of prosecution, he had recommended that she not be prosecuted.

 

Because of course he did.

 

Here are Comey’s findings, which demonstrate full violation of multiple provisions of federal law:

 

  • Hillary Clinton utilized multiple “different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.” So she was lying when she said that she only set up the system so that she could use one handheld device.

 

  • Hillary transmitted classified information. Here’s Comey: “From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were ‘up-classified’ to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.” So she lied that no classified information was received or sent.

 

  • Hillary did not hand over all her work emails to the State Department. At least three of those emails were classified “at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.” Comey was kind here to Hillary – he said that there was no evidence that “any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.” Except, of course, that deleting such emails would be the entire purpose of having a private server.

 

  • Hillary’s lawyers didn’t read the emails they deleted – they just deleted stuff based on header information and search terms. “It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server,” Comey said. This would be destroying possibly classified material. And as Comey says, there may be a fair bit of data they never saw: “It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.”

 

  • Comey admitted openly that Hillary’s team was “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information….None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”

 

  • Hillary knew that classified material was passing across her server; as Comey acknowledged, “even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

 

  • Hillary’s server could have been hacked, and some of her emails were likely hacked in other people’s inboxes: “With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.” [Bold Text by Blog Editor}

 

So, Hillary lied. She lied that she never transmitted classified information. She lied that she only used a private server because she wanted one device. She lied that the State Department allowed her to jerry-rig this technological set-up. She lied that the emails were never breached.

 

But according to Comey, no biggie.

 

Now, Comey essentially admitted that Hillary violated federal law. As he said, “Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.” And Comey stated that the FBI had “investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.”

 

But no matter. The law doesn’t apply to Hillary Clinton. As Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”

 

No, we’re dealing with the Clintons. There’s a different set of rules for high-profile Democrats.

 

And no, Comey’s excuse-making that similar cases aren’t prosecuted doesn’t cut it. Here’s what Comey said:

 

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past. In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

 

Nonsense.

 

Past cases have focused on willful transmission of classified information to outside actors. But that’s not what the rule of law is. The rule of law says that laws must be applied as they are written, and they must be applied equally. Here are just a few of the statutes Hillary clearly violated, according to Comey’s own statement:

 

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

 

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.

 

18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.

 

18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control.

 

Yes, Hillary broke the law.

 

But the law no longer matters. The woman for whom the executive branch just manipulated the law will likely end up running that executive branch. God help us all.

 

John Adams wrote in the Massachusetts Constitution that the purpose of separation of powers was to ensure that we establish “a government of laws, and not of men.” So much for that idea. We now have a government by the Obamas, the Clintons, the elites. And thanks to the Divine Right of Kings, they are not subject to the laws of the merely mortal whom they govern.

___________________

© COPYRIGHT 2016, THE DAILY WIRE

 

Tony Newbill Comment to “More on why we are where we are with Tyranny Today in America”


Jefferson on Tyranny & Liberty

This post is somewhat a Part II to Tony Newbill’s defense of Ranchers and Farmers as an explanation or reason that these land owners are upset with Government appropriation of land that has been in the traditional usage in the public domain or even stolen from private ownership.

 

JRH 3/23/16

Please Support NCCR

********************

Tony Newbill Comment to “More on why we are where we are with Tyranny Today in America

 

n3angus

March 18, 2016 at 12:16 PM

 

Understanding what we are up against by reading the First Link PLAYING OUTSIDE THE RULES. Read the back and forth debate between Walley and Suckling … When you get done reading this back and forth, I would say that the ego of environmentalism has become more important than the realities of what sustainability means and the courts need to be asked to consider this line of thought when they are deciding on the use of resources going forward here!!!!!!
Kieran Suckling got his name from an Irish saint. Now he thinks he is one:
http://www.rangemagazine.com/archives/stories/winter99/playing_outside_the_rules.htm

Hundreds, if not thousands, of public land ranchers, loggers and miners have had their livelihoods destroyed by the ultra-effective strategies of the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity (SWC). They move like a band of guerrilla insurgents in their battle for public lands. The old, dogmatic environmental groups like the Sierra Club and the Audubon Society have became so bureaucratic and public opinion driven, that they have become slow and cumbersome in their efforts. SWC moves rapidly because decision making is concentrated in the activists who founded the group, and they appear not to give a damn about public opinion or the lives of people affected.

 

 

Suckling describes his team as “incredibly driven and passionate about the work we do. We are creative and manic. We have not played by the general ‘rules’ of activism. Unpredictability, speed and creative action has made it very hard for extractive industries and the government to anticipate or respond to us. By keeping everyone, including ourselves, continually moving in new directions, we have been able to destabilize the status quo of subsidized logging, grazing, mining and urban sprawl…. Many groups are hampered by the fear of upsetting their congressional connections, their funders, the media, etc. While we feel the pull of such things, we daily remind ourselves that social change comes with social tension and that our job is to create that dynamic tension, regardless of the pressure of back-down or compromise.”
Their “manic” guerrilla tactics have been efficient, damn efficient. The group’s active litigation record-84 lawsuits in five years-on everything from waterways to woodlands to dams has attained national attention. The group says it has won 77 percent of final judgments. Suckling declares their success is built on what he describes as the two strongest forces of the environmental movement: science and law.
“The law says that the best possible science is to be used in managing our public lands,” he says, “so we conduct our own scientific research to show that’s not happening, then we litigate. It’s an incredible amount of work, but with an honest judge you can shut down a billion-dollar development in a heartbeat.”

 

 

Kieran’s using “The force of the courts,” has created untold suffering and distress for many westerners.
The effects of courtroom and backroom bargaining by the SWC deeply trouble   New Mexico rancher, Hugh McKinney. “What knocked me off my lease was a backroom agreement between the Forest Service and SWC [what some call The Tucson Back-Alley Agreement] that excluded ranchers. The judge did not approve it; he would not sign it. The agreement affects you to the point that’s all you talk about with friends and neighbors. It bothered me to the point that I have no spirit, no energy to plan for a future. They took my allotment with lies and I have no recourse to correct those lies. We were forced off our land, but the Forest Service called it volunteering to quit.”

 

 

I asked Kieran’s old professor, Pax, a hard question during the telephone interview. “What do you think of the pain, human suffering, the dismantling of rural communities created by Kieran’s actions?”
The professor’s indifferent answer was a revelation that brought Suckling’s environmental philosophy back to its seed. “He doesn’t see any other way to proceed in his work without disruption like that! He doesn’t do it for the sake of disruption, but he is not going to stop his work simply because people are uncomfortable with it!”
I had asked Kieran similar questions in our Tucson meeting.
Walley: “What about those people you are putting off the land and out of work? What is your ethic and social responsibility to those humans?”
Suckling answered slowly and cautiously, choosing each word with care and sidestepping the question: “Our government and its corporate sponsors have created a system of subsidies that has to be abolished. They turned the lands into a commodity. We have to get public land users off this welfare system. It is not a simple thing to break those chains.”
Walley: “But what about those people who are suffering during this change?”
Suckling: “As I say, it is not a simple thing. We have entire communities that have grown up in this system of land-based government subsides. To change that is not a painless thing.”
Walley: “You, are creating rural refugees!”
Kieran’s ego finally shows, his speech picks up speed and emphasis: “It’s more than rural. I’m dealing with the Grand Canyon, Hoover Dam and Los Angeles. Thirteen million people are used to getting their water this way, I say that’s great, but we are going to show them a different way to do it!”
Walley: “You are forcing change on society and you are aware of it?”
Suckling: “Yeah! Isn’t that what an activist is! What do you think an activist is? We change society!”
Walley: “Can’t you do this in a humane and gentle way?


Suckling: “It is sad, but I don’t hear you put that in a direct relationship to the effect on the land. I hear you talk about the pain of the people but I don’t see you match that up with the pain of the species.”
Walley (dumbfounded): “What?”
Suckling: “A loach minnow is more important, than say, Betty and Jim’s ranch-a thousand times more important. I’m not against ranching, it is a job. My concern is the impact on the land.”
Walley: “Ranchers across America and Australia are going to read this article Kieran. What would you say to them?”
Suckling: “The logging industry denied for years that logging damaged the land. Because they refused to acknowledge problems or change their operations, the   came under tremendous public pressure, which led to a massive collapse of the industry on public lands. Thus far, the ranching industry is heading down the same   path. Its obstacles will be far greater: many more species are threatened by grazing than by logging, the public is much more aware of environmental damage today than a decade ago, and activists are bringing skills and organizing abilities to the overgrazing issue which have been honed in the logging battles. Ranchers should take a long hard look at what happened with the logging industry. They should also take a long hard look at the reality of overgrazing on public lands. If the industry does not acknowledge and change, it won’t exist on public land two decades from now. Ultimately it will be ranchers, not environmentalists, who determine whether public lands grazing will continue.”
Walley: “Do you see a middle-ground with the ranching industry? Compromise? If so, what are the parameters you could work within?”
Suckling: “I sincerely believe that cattle ranching has done more damage to public lands in the Southwest than logging, mining, urban sprawl, or any other extractive use. While it is easy to see the scars of logging and sprawl, the denuding of groundcover, erosion of soils, and destruction of riparian vegetation is far more widespread. Numerous scientific studies confirm that species endangerment in the Southwest is more closely connected to grazing than any other single event. That said, I also have no personal dislike of cattle grazing. If cattle can be run on public lands and not destroy the environment, that’s fine with me, but it is up to the ranching industry to change its practices and demonstrate public lands can be economically grazed without damaging the land. That is the forum of compromise.  We have worked out a few projects with loggers because it has been demonstrated that small trees in thickets can be removed while benefiting the environment. The ranching industry needs to demonstrate the same. Happy talk about ‘sustainability’ is just talk. Extrapolations from private lands in different ecosystems to public lands are unconvincing. The parameters, then, have to take the form of demonstration.”

 

READ ENTIRETY (Kieran Suckling got his name from an Irish saint. Now he thinks he is one; By J. Zane Walley; Range Magazine; © 1998)

 

 

…… And to point out a conception of Animal Racism with the way these Environmentalists are using Government laws to “Select Certain Species for Salvation over Others” and compare that to the concept of Human extinction under what is becoming obvious as an effort to engineer a die-off of humanity by locking up all the resources that humanity survives on. When do we see these same Environmentalists begin to Select themselves as the Threatened Species that needs a Law to protect their Existence????

 

What stands out as a Possible solution to bring balance back to what these Radicals are doing to human existence? Use the same tactics of lawsuits to sustain resources for humans that they have used for the species they have used as tools to lock up the resources away from Human access for Life!!!!! The Courts have NEVER been put in a situation to Decide if Human Life is More important than Animal Species. If Courts rule this way as far as making resources the topic of how to preserve Renewable usage for Human Life so that Human Life can then be what sustains Animal Life…. And the path Environmentalism is on will leave NO ONE Human Left to take care of the habitat that takes care of the Animal species. The Courts need to rule on this aspect of this effect going forward, starting with the Irrigation Water Lawsuit here in Central Oregon!!!!!!!!
http://www.bendbulletin.com/localstate/environment/3987937-151/frog-lawsuit-could-change-deschutes-river-flows

 

Environmentalists and irrigators have differing opinions on how a court order being sought for changes in Deschutes River flows upstream of Bend would affect farms, ranches and other water users.

 

The Center for Biological Diversity and WaterWatch of Oregon filed for a preliminary injunction last week, requesting the Bureau of Reclamation and three irrigation districts in Central Oregon manage the river’s water differently. The irrigation districts named in the filing are the Central Oregon, North Unit and Tumalo.

 

The problem, says Noah Greenwald, endangered species director for the Center for Biological Diversity, is this leaves the Oregon spotted frog and other river animals with little water. He said the group, which is based in Arizona and has an office in Portland, wants to find a way for the amphibians and irrigators to coexist.

 

 

Currently the bureau keeps wintertime flows in the Deschutes River reduced in order to fill upstream reservoirs. Summertime flows are then higher to supply farmers, ranchers and other water users.

 

 

So if the court orders a change in how the Deschutes River is managed this spring, people who draw water from the district may face “abrupt and severe restrictions,” according to a news release last week from the Deschutes Basin Board of Control. The group represents eight irrigation districts.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Frog lawsuit could change Deschutes River flows: Environmental groups, irrigators have differing views on court case; By Dylan J. Darling; The Bulletin; 2/14/16 12:01AM – updated 2/16/16 11:27AM)

 

The Opening arguments on the 22nd regarding our [Tony Newbill is from Oregon] Irrigation water lawsuit with Suckling needs to hear this concept. We need to ask the courts to consider the sustainability of habitat for animal species if the trend of creating an environment that humans go extinct is not balanced out here before it’s too late. The crisis of human extinction is met with the Chaos of those events unfolding, because if we get to this kind of a stage in food production the chaos will override the efforts to keep habitat sustained!!!!

 

I would say that the ego of environmentalism has become more important than the realities of what sustainability means and the courts need to be asked to consider this line of thought when they are deciding on the use of resources going forward here!!!!!!

 

And here is more on how we can see the Egotism that’s gone array from the reality that the Courts should not be influenced with:

https://law.lclark.edu/live/profiles/3604-kieran-suckling 

 

[Blog Editor: The link above is a short backgrounder of Kieran Suckling. The last paragraph provides an interesting micro-profile of Suckling:]

 

The New Yorker has dubbed Suckling’s organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, “the most important radical environmental group in the country” and Suckling a “trickster, philosopher, publicity hound, master strategist, and unapologetic pain in the ass.” The LA Weekly calls the Center “pound for pound, dollar for dollar, the most effective conservation organization in the country,” and says of Suckling: “Rimbaud reinvented poetry. Kierán Suckling would do the same with environmentalism.” (Animal Law Conference: Kierán Suckling; Lewis and Clark Law School)

 

The New Yorker has dubbed Suckling’s organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, “the most important radical environmental group in the country” and Suckling a “trickster, philosopher, publicity hound, master strategist, and unapologetic pain in the ass.” The LA Weekly calls the Center “pound for pound, dollar for dollar, the most effective conservation organization in the country,” and says of Suckling: “Rimbaud reinvented poetry. Kierán Suckling would do the same with environmentalism.”

 

Mr. President: 5 Ways to Salvage Your Environmental Legacy (and Our Future)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kieran-suckling/obama-environmental-policy_b_2086050.html

 

 

The climate crisis is deepening, rare plants and animals are vanishing at an accelerating clip, and politicians — well supported by the polluter class — are freshly emboldened to chip away at laws that protect our water, air, environment and wildlife.

 

To be blunt, when it came to tackling the most important environmental issues of our age, President Obama’s first term was a disappointment. He has a chance to salvage his legacy (and ours) in his second term. Here are the five places to start:

 

  1. Address climate change and ocean acidification. …

 

 

  1. Stem the extinction crisis.

 

 

  1. Keep politics out of the Endangered Species Act and other vital environmental laws.

 

 

  1. Safeguard our public lands, wild places and the Arctic.

 

 

  1. Embrace a newer, cleaner energy. …

 

It’s time to reinvent our energy future by focusing on renewable sources of energy, including solar, geothermal and wind. Yes, these come with complications, and we’ve got to be smart about how we make the shift, but it can and must be done. There’s a smarter, saner way to move ahead, and that path is open to us. All we need now is the courage and political will to step onto it. (Mr. President: 5 Ways to Salvage Your Environmental Legacy (and Our Future)); By Kieran Suckling; HuffPost Green; 11/7/12 01:12 am ET – updated 1/6/13)

 

Suckling points out that he wants more of the Federal Lands Locked up and Obama has already locked up 265 million acres so the courts need to be asked HOW MUCH More before we cause a Major Disruption in Food Supplies Worldwide that causes People to become Chaotic and that Chaos interrupts the sustaining of Habitat????

 

Obama’s designations total 265 million acres, and he isn’t done yet:
https://landandlivestock.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/ranchers-losing-ground-in-government-land-grab/

 

As the presidential election heats up, ask yourself which candidate will repeal WOTUS, get control of the EPA and allow ranchers to get back to work without being held back by unfair regulations.

 

Don’t hold your breath for any of them to “repeal WOTUS” etc. There is not a dime’s worth of difference in any of them. They are all under the influence of radical environmentalism (because it is PC and being PC is necessary to get elected).

 

But, at least it is encouraging to see a main-stream rag like Beef Magazine is finally beginning to pay attention to what is going on in the (about to get really) Wild West. — jtl, 419

I don’t know about you, but in my opinion, the 2016 presidential election can’t come soon enough.

 

For the 22nd time during his nearly eight years in office, President Obama has taken advantage of the Antiquities Act of 1906, locking up millions of acres of land in the western states.

 

Obama’s designations total 265 million acres, and his most recent designation of the Sand to Snow National Monument, Mojave Trails National Monument and Castle Mountains National Monument totals 1.8 million acres.

 

With several months left in office, Obama is expected to designate another 10 million acres of land in Oregon, Arizona and Utah. What’s worse, Obama will more than likely continue to use his executive power when making these designations without … READ THE REST (Ranchers losing ground in government land grab; By Amanda Radke in BEEF Daily; Land & Livestock International, Inc.; 2/29/16)

 

And besides the use of Monumenting lands, the Sue and Settle tactic has been deemed Undemocratic:

 

http://www.gazettextra.com/article/20131219/ARTICLES/131219660/1034

 

[Blog Editor: Either go to the above link or read the same link summary in the post “More on why we are where we are with Tyranny Today in America”. The “Sue and Settle tactic” is the topic.]

 

And Suckling says he wants Radical transformation:

 

http://www.rangemagazine.com/archives/stories/winter99/playing_outside_the_rules.htm

 

[Blog Editor: The link summary is above in this post.]

 

So is he willing to cause people to become Chaotic????? Did his actions cause people like Hammonds, Bundys and Finicum to act out the ways in which they did or were made to be seen as such???????

 

4. [Blog Editor: This looks like a quote but I’m not sure where Newbill found it.] Safeguard our public lands, wild places and the Arctic. There are nearly 650 million acres of federal land in the United States.

 

But not all of those 650 acres of Federal Lands is Grazing production for food, as this link points out. So we need to start considering how much of an Impact has Environmentalist Land Grabs affected our sustainable food supplies, because we don’t know to what extent these same NGOs have affected other food producing areas around the world too????

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangeland

 

Rangelands are grasslandsshrublandswoodlandswetlands, and deserts that are grazed by domestic livestock or wild animals. Types of rangelands include tallgrass and shortgrass prairies, desert grasslands and shrublands, woodlands, savannaschaparralssteppes, and tundras. Rangelands do not include forests lacking grazable understory vegetation, barren desert, farmland, or land covered by solid rock, concrete and/or glaciers.

 

Rangelands are distinguished from pasture lands because they grow primarily native vegetation, rather than plants established by humans. Rangelands are also managed principally with practices such as managed livestock grazing and prescribed fire rather than more intensive agricultural practices of seeding, irrigation, and the use of fertilizers.

 

 

Fire is also an important regulator of range vegetation, whether set by humans or resulting from lightning. Fires tend to reduce the abundance of woody plants and promote herbaceous plants including grasses, forbs, and grass-like plants. The suppression or reduction of periodic wildfires from desert shrublands, savannas, or woodlands frequently invites the dominance of trees and shrubs to the near exclusion of grasses and forbs.[1]

 

READ ENTIRETY (Rangeland; Wikipedia; page last modified 2/24/16 22:02)

 

And don’t forget the Dead Harvest Video, it’s a glowing example of yet more reasons to consider if we are reaching a food supply crisis:

 

https://vimeo.com/149917045

Dead Harvest

Posted by Gar Tootelian

Posted 12/2015

Dead Harvest from Gar Tootelian on Vimeo.

 

 

And this guy wants a Great Disruption, I wonder how many others in the Environmental community want this too???

 

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/08/opinion/gilding-earth-limits/index.html

[Blog Editor: The above link begins with a Paul Gilding 2-minute CNN video I’m not embedding about Enviro-Marxist spiel in forcing people to take care of the environment for the good of planet, then comes the CNN article.]

 

For 50 years the environmental movement has unsuccessfully argued that we should save the planet for moral reasons, that there were more important things than money. Ironically, it now seems it will be money — through the economic impact of climate change and resource constraint — that will motivate the sweeping changes necessary to avert catastrophe.

 

 

The eminent scientists of the Global Footprint Network, for example, calculate that we need about 1.5 Earths to sustain this economy. In other words, to keep operating at our current level, we need 50% more Earth than we’ve got.

 

 

… Chinese Environment Minister Zhou Shengxian said last year, “The depletion, deterioration and exhaustion of resources and the worsening ecological environment have become bottlenecks and grave impediments to (our) economic and social development.” If I had said that in the ’90s, when I was the global head of Greenpeace, it would have been dismissed as doom-and-gloom extremism!

 

 

As a result, the crisis will be big, it will be soon, and it will be economic, not environmental. The fact is the planet will take further bludgeoning, further depleting its capital, but the economy cannot — so we’ll respond not because the environment is under great threat, but because the science and economics shows that something far more important to us is jeopardized — economic growth.

 

 

So when this crisis hits, will we respond or will we simply slide into collapse? Crisis elicits a powerful human response, whether it be personal health, natural disaster, corporate crisis or national threat. Previously immovable barriers to change quickly disappear.

 

In this case, the crisis will be global and will manifest as the end of economic growth, thereby striking at the very heart of our model of human progress. While that will make the task of ending denial harder, it also means what’s at risk is, quite simply, everything we hold to be important. The last time this happened was World War II, and our response to that is illustrative of both the denial and delay process and the likely form our response to this crisis will take.

 

 

Do you find this hard to imagine today? Then try to imagine the alternative — that in a collapsing global economy and society we will stand by and simply watch the slide. There is no precedent in modern history on which to base that conclusion and plenty of evidence for the alternative. Humanity may be slow, but we are not stupid. Get ready for the great disruption. … You can READ ENTIRETY, but trust me it’s propaganda to get the normal person living a life to accept harsh State control of government, production, population and our lives. (The Earth is full; By Paul Gilding; CNN; 4/8/12 Updated 9:39 AM ET)

 

I have more examples of these kinds of things, but hey do we know what we are really up against here????

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

F.B.I. AND OREGON POLICE KILLED A INNOCENT POLITICAL DISSIDENT


Lavoy Finicum surrendering
LaVoy Finicum surrendering

 

I have been following the Oregon incident with the Bundy ranchers holed up on a nature reserve to protest Bureau of Land Management (BLM) abuse of land despotically managed and usurped by the Federal government. The standoff led to mass arrests mostly of people that were protesting the BLM legally and one person who was a reporter probably because his reporting placed the government in a bad light and favorable toward ranchers. The standoff culminated in what I believe to be the unjustifiable murder of LaVoy Finicum by State and Federal police. The last post was a submission by Justin Smith which I felt was a decent summary up to the date.

 

I have been a bit surprised by those who usually demonstrate a lack of trust of information disseminated by government sources who support the storyline that Finicum was justifiably killed by authorities because he reached for a gun inside his vest when cornered by multiple armed police. On a personal level I don’t buy that explanation at least not with more information being released for public viewing. I expect a coverup.

 

Below is a post from Timothy Baldwin which I believe is closer to the truth.

 

JRH 2/11/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************************************************

F.B.I. AND OREGON POLICE KILLED A INNOCENT POLITICAL DISSIDENT

 

By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.

February 11, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

 

As an introduction to my thoughts on Lavoy Finnicum’s killing in Burns, Oregon, consider my article published in the Flathead Beacon’s Two For Thought weekly Opinion section:

 

The FBI and Oregon police killed a rancher, Lavoy Finicum, last week. Savoy joined Ammon Bundy, among others, for three weeks in occupying a refuge on public lands in Burns. Like many Americans, the occupiers believed BLM had been long abusing power. Police released one video of the incident (but not other pertinent surveillance). Was this killing lawful?

 

Under the Fourth Amendment, police who use deadly force have a burden to prove their actions were objectively reasonable in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them based on the totality of the circumstances.

 

Regardless of one’s view of the occupation, the video raises issues regarding police’ actions: (1) Why block the highway in nowhere-ville? (2) Why use snipers and a dozen-plus officers? (3) Why not use spike strips to stop him? (4) When exactly was Lavoy likely to harm police?—when shot, Lavoy was facing no police, could barely walk in deep snow and held no gun. (5) Lavoy had not just committed a dangerous felony and fleeing therefrom. (6) Police had prior opportunities to serve an arrest warrant in a safe manner. (7) Why immediately rush Lavoy and spark conflict rather than contain the area and determine his actions?

 

The occupiers did not convince the greater part of society to aid them, given their seeming “state of war” approach. Still, if our laws can condemn Lavoy, they can also condemn police.

 

In fairness, there are some who are not normally forgiving to government abuse but believe police were justified in killing Lavoy: one such notable viewpoint on this incident is my dad, Chuck Baldwin. I, on the other hand, believe the video suggests that police were not justified in killing Lavoy when they did–even assuming he had a pistol inside his jacket and was reaching for it.

 

After Lavoy’s death, his family was able to view his body. They released a press statement that they observed nine (9) bullet inserts in Lavoy’s body. Police have yet to release autopsy records or comment on that statement; however, reports record police admitting that Lavoy was shot several times.

 

For now, assuming Lavoy was shot multiple times, those shots had to occur before the last shot–the kill shot to Lavoy’s head, which dropped Lavoy to the snow-covered ground.

 

Since police did not release any audio or other videos–all of which they possess and could release–of the incident, the public does not know exactly when and how many times police shot Lavoy, with the exception of what appears to be the last shot to Lavoy’s head.

 

Regardless of whether Lavoy was shot 9 (as Lavoy’s family states) or a few times (as police state), the video shows that the last shot was the fatal head shot. Thus, the other shots were to his body before Lavoy was shot in the head. Of course, all of these shots had to happen within seconds after Lavoy exited his vehicle with his hands up.

 

If Lavoy was shot more than once in his body before the last shot to his head, this supports the argument that quickly after Lavoy exited his vehicle with his hands up (signaling his surrender) police shot him in his body. This would have caused Lavoy to drop his hands where he was shot.

 

Since Lavoy dropped his hands to his body and statements from both Lavoy’s family and police state that Lavoy was shot several times in his body, one must assume that Lavoy dropped his hands and placed them on his body where he was shot. Ironically, Lavoy’s dropping his hands in this manner was the alleged justification for killing Lavoy.

 

Did police create the “justification” of killing Lavoy by shooting him in his body, which caused him to drop his hands?

 

Still, assuming police did not shoot Lavoy in his body before they shot him in his head (which means they shot him while he was dead on the ground–why would they do that?) and assuming Lavoy was reaching for a pistol inside his jacket or pocket (which is it?), the video reveals that the police who rushed out of the woods and charged Lavoy killed him prematurely.

 

The video shows two police charging Lavoy (one from the bottom and one from the top of the video) immediately after Lavoy exited his truck. This rush approach was not only unnecessary, but also needlessly provocative under these circumstances.

 

In a real sense, police created the exigency needed to kill Lavoy for “officer safety”, similar to police creating the exigency of completely blocking the road in what appears to be a location that gave Lavoy very little time to slow down or stop his truck. (One would need to study Oregon’s and federal laws of when and how road blocks are to be conducted: there are limits by law. See e.g. State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Ore. 131, 134, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (ruling road block was unconstitutional); see also Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Ore. 97, 125, 743 P.2d 692, 70 (Or. 1987) (discussion of constitutionality of road blocks).

 

This is clear from the video: police did not give Lavoy a reasonable opportunity to surrender and enough time to assess the danger level. Instead of the heavy force of police maintaining their positions behind cover until such time as Lavoy clearly demonstrated his intent, police–who appeared little concerned about containing the safety of everyone and use as little force as necessary–immediately charged Lavoy and quickly shot him.

 

But here are the factors that essentially demonstrate that police killed Lavoy unjustifiably.

 

During the short and quick period of time that the two aforementioned police rushed him, Lavoy (1) could hardly keep his footing in the deep snow, (2) had no gun in his hand, (3) had no meaningful opportunity to draw a pistol inside his clothing quickly enough to take accurate aim and shoot any nearby police, and (4) was not even facing the two nearest police (who charged him) when he was shot in the head and killed. The totality of these circumstances supports the conclusion that he was killed prematurely, or at a minimum, calls into question the police’ claim of justification.

 

Assuming Lavoy would have pulled a gun at any time and posed a legitimate threat to a police officer, there were dozens of police ready and able to kill or disable Lavoy. This reality is what makes the actions of the two police who charged Lavoy appear so unnecessary, excessive and provocative. One must wonder how much training and experience the police had (especially who shot Lavoy) for these situations; what kind of briefing took place before the incident; and whether the rush tactic at a road block was preplanned or orchestrated.

 

Admittedly, more facts are needed to form a solid opinion here.

 

The government has a heavy burden of proof of justifying their killing of Lavoy. The released video and summary statement by police that since Lavoy was “going for a gun” police were justified in killing him do not meet that heavy burden: the totality of the circumstances simply does not appear to justify their killing Lavoy.

 

Police should release (as they should in time with demands from the Finnicum family attorneys) all of the evidence relative to the question, including:

 

  • use of force reports

 

  • incident reports

 

  • police training manuals and certifications

 

  • applicable warrants or court orders and affidavits in support

 

  • written and recorded witness statements

 

  • photos of entire scene and Lavoy’s body

 

  • in-car video surveillance of all vehicles and drones

 

  • police body-cameras of all officers

 

  • police policy and procedures (state and federal) for use of deadly force

 

  • briefing memorandums

 

  • dispatch records

 

  • road block planning memorandums

 

  • officer duty and task assignments

 

  • autopsy report

 

  • ballistic reports

 

One interested in justice would hope that the government does not withhold, destroy, lose or fabricate the evidence. Whether you agree with Lavoy and the Oregon occupiers or not, the government must follow the law. Accepting any other standard places all political dissidents and protestors in the government’s absolute wrath and arbitrary use of deadly force. Liberty cannot survive in that environment.

 

Lastly, there are federal laws in effect to detain and prosecute “enemy combatants” and “domestic terrorists” who place themselves in a state of war with the United States. Notably, the federal and state governments did not treat Lavoy and the occupiers under such laws. Rather, they treated them as normal citizens of the United States who were simply breaking the law, such as criminal trespass, intimidation, and impeding an officer’s investigation/duty. Therefore, Lavoy and the occupiers deserved the same treatment and respect of the law as you and I.

 

______________________

© 2016 Timothy N. Baldwin, JD – All Rights Reserved.

 

Timothy Baldwin, born in 1979, is an attorney licensed to practice law in Montana (and formerly Florida) and handles a variety of cases, including constitutional, criminal, and civil. Baldwin graduated from the University of West Florida in 2001 with a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree in English and Political Science. In 2004, Baldwin graduated from Cumberland School of Law at Samford University in Birmingham, AL with a Juris Doctorate (JD) degree. From there, Baldwin became an Assistant State Attorney in Florida. For 2 1/2 years, Baldwin prosecuted criminal actions and tried nearly 60 jury trials. In 2006, Baldwin started his private law practice and has maintained it since.

 

Baldwin is a published author, public speaker and student of political philosophy. Baldwin is the author of Freedom For A Change, Romans 13-The True Meaning of Submission, and To Keep or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns–all of which are available for purchase throughlibertydefenseleague.com. Baldwin has also authored hundreds of political articles relative to liberty in the United States of America. Baldwin has been the guest of scores of radio shows and public events and continues to exposit principles which the people in America will need to determine its direction for the future.

 

Web site: libertydefenseleague.com

 

Contact Tim Baldwin

Obamination Benghazi AssWholliness Video Shopping!


Frequent commenter – Dajjal – on my NCCR blog pointed the way to a post on Islam Exposed similar to the same subject matter of Hillary Clinton’s penchant for being pathological liar. The post Dajjal read is called “Clinton’s Infamous Legacy” by Justin Smith. The piece on Islam Exposed looks at Hillary with a bit more exasperated outrage. Enjoy.

JRH 10/26/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

Dajjal Comment

NCCR

October 26, 2015 at 2:25 AM

Judicial Watch discovered that Obamination went video shopping, first blaming the attack on a video sermon before settling on “Innocence Of Muslims”. See both videos and links to JW here:

 

+++

Obamination Benghazi AssWholliness Video Shopping!

Posted by BEN

October 24, 2015 4:12 PM

Islam Exposed

Judicial watch has a new revelation as a result of a FOIA suit. Obamination set out to blame an internet video for the Benghazi Massacre within three hours of the attack. But there is more: Obamination went video shopping! They first settled on an obscure, infrequently viewed recording of a sermon in which a pastor compares Allah to God.

“The documents detail that only three hours after the initial attack on U.S. personnel in Benghazi, the White House contacted YouTube in an apparent effort to initially blame the assault on an obscure “Pastor John video,” rather than filmmaker Nakoula “Mark” Basseley Nakoula.” Details at Judicial Watch [Emphasis added.]:

VIDEO: God Vs Allah Bible study with Pastor Jon Courson [47:25]

 

Posted by Draconus33

Published on Sep 5, 2011

A bible study comparing YHWH of the Bible and Allah of the Quran. Are they the same deity as Muslims claim?

VIDEO: Innocence of Muslims 2012 (Real “Sam Bacile” Version)

 

Posted by Logical Atheism

Published on May 19, 2015

You can now watch the cheap crappy film that’s caused a lot of fuss. The full-length version is 74 minutes but this covers the highlights. Muslims need to get a sense of humor, man. All Islamic death-threat spamming will be deleted. You lost, butthurt bitches. Deal with it! Go do this to Life of Brian.

Court Ruling Link Here: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/05/18/12-57302.pdf

 

“In April 2014, Judicial Watch forced the release of State Department documents it had obtained, including an internal email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.” Other documents showed that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and a possible kidnap attempt. The documents were obtained by Judicial Watch as a result of a June 21, 2013, FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00951)).” [Emphasis added.]

 

“The Obama administration – including Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice – knew immediately that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack. The State Department’s new smoking gun documents put to rest any question about what Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice knew – and when they knew it,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Within minutes of the attack, the administration, specifically Hillary Clinton, began lying to the American people by blaming an obscure Internet video. No wonder Hillary Clinton is the great destroyer of State Department emails. One can assume that Mrs. Clinton would not have stolen and destroyed emails in violation of law and various court orders if she didn’t have something to hide. And it shouldn’t take a federal court order to find out that Hillary Clinton evidently had no clue how the State Department and the FBI responded to terrorist attacks on State Department personnel.” Source: [Emphasis added.]

The accursed termangent [Blog Editor: I had to look this word up. Here are a couple links to a variant spelling (termangant) that I think the author intended – Vocabulary.com and Dictionary.com] knew that the Benghazi Massacre was a planned terrorist attack, not spontaneous, not a protest and not related to any internet video . She lied to us! Do we want to elect another liar???

Demand that your choice for the Republican presidential nomination nationalize the election by making early declarations of his selections for Vice President, cabinet officers, open seats & RINO replacements and a full slate of down ballot endorsements for governors and state legislators.

Demand that your preferred nominee educate himself about the identity and character of the enemy and its doctrines by reading Islam 101 For Politicians.

Court blocks pro-life group from releasing some new fetal part footage


Life Site News reports on a Judge blocking further exposé videos pertaining the collusion of Planned Parenthood and StemExpress to traffic in baby body parts left over from killing unborn babies.

Sign the petition for Congress to investigate Planned Parenthood nefarious use of tax dollars to market murdered babies for their body parts.

JRH 7/30/15

Please Support NCCR

*************************

BREAKING: Court blocks pro-life group from releasing some new fetal part footage

David Daleiden, the lead researcher with CMP, has said that another nine videos in the series are slated for release.

 

By John Jalsevac

July 29, 2015 – 9:08 pm EST

Life Site News

Urgent: Sign the petition to demand that Congress investigate and defund Planned Parenthood. Click here.

July 29, 15 (LifeSiteNews) – The California Superior Court has issued a narrow temporary restraining order preventing the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), a pro-life group, from releasing further undercover video footage taken of three top-level staff of StemExpress.

CMP is the organization behind the series of three videos released over the past three weeks exposing the alleged harvesting and sale of body parts from aborted babies by Planned Parenthood – body parts that are then purchased by StemExpress.

CMP has alleged that the fees paid by StemExpress to Planned Parenthood violate federal law prohibiting the sale and trafficking of human tissue.

While Planned Parenthood has claimed that the fees paid to them by StemExpress merely cover their costs, and fall within the bounds of the law, the video footage released so far has appeared to show Planned Parenthood employees seeking profit as part of the transaction.

In the most recent video, released Tuesday, a Planned Parenthood affiliate vice president was caught on video describing how the abortion organization can maximize profit. “I think a per-item thing works a little better, just because we can see how much we can get out of it,” Dr. Savita Sinde said of the aborted baby.

The Associated Press, which broke the news about the court order, reports that the undercover videos of the Stem Express staff were filmed at a restaurant in May.

It is unclear just how significant an impact the court order will have on the release of subsequent videos in the series. David Daleiden, the lead researcher with CMP, has said that at least nine more videos are slated for release.

The restraining order reportedly only pertains to the footage of the Stem Express employees, meaning that any other footage, including that featuring Planned Parenthood employees, can still be released as planned.

In an exclusive comment to LifeSiteNews after the release of the court order, Daleiden said that, at the end of the day, what happened in the courtroom may actually be a victory for the pro-life group.

“The ruling is very narrow, concerning only one specific meeting, and it is temporary and contingent pending further litigation,” he said. “The judge actually threw out completely the part of StemExpress’ case where they were asking to suppress the documents on their baby parts sales.”

“It was a much better day for us than it was for them and Planned Parenthood.”

In a statement released after the ruling, StemExpress stated that they sought the restraining order “on the grounds that CMP and Daleiden violated California’s anti-wiretapping law under Penal Code § 632 (Invasion of Privacy Act).”

“We will continue to pursue all available legal remedies against CMP and Daleiden,” said the company.

However, Daleiden told LifeSiteNews that StemExpress’ complaints are groundless.

“The recordings in California complied with the California law,” he said. “The California law only applies to ‘confidential communications’ and does not include conversations held in public that anyone can overhear. There is significant case law on this point as well.”

In a separate statement released after the court ruling, CMP accused Stem Express of using “meritless litigation” to “cover-up this illegal baby parts trade, suppress free speech, and silence the citizen press reporting on issues of burning concern to the American public.”

The AP reports that the restraining order will remain in place until a hearing on Aug. 19.

The videos released by CMP to date have amassed millions of views, and have been featured in countless media nationally and internationally.

Even more striking, perhaps, than the footage appearing to demonstrate that Planned Parenthood is profiting from the sale of the aborted baby body parts, has been the footage showing the cavalier manner in which the Planned Parenthood employees have spoken about the aborted babies.

In an interview with LifeSiteNews, Fr. Frank Pavone, one of the pro-life leaders behind the release of the video series, said, “When an abortionist dehumanizes the baby that he or she is about to kill, the abortionist also dehumanizes himself. And this is what we are seeing in these people. We see it in Deborah Nucatola sipping the wine and eating the salad and talking about the body parts.”

Pavone said one of the main objectives of the video series was to humanize the unborn baby. “When people see and hear terms like ‘eyes, livers, hearts’ it’s like, ‘What are we talking about here? This is ghoulish disgusting activity.’”

Developing…

Urgent: Sign the petition to demand that Congress investigate and defund Planned Parenthood. Click here.

 

___________________________________________

All Content Copyright 1997-2015 LifeSiteNews.com. All Rights Reserved. 

 

About Life Site News

 

LifeSiteNews.com is a non-profit Internet service dedicated to issues of culture, life, and family. It was launched in September 1997. LifeSiteNews Daily News reports and information pages are used by numerous organizations and publications, educators, professionals and political, religious and life and family organization leaders and grassroots people across North America and internationally.

 

LifeSiteNews.com Daily News reports are widely circulated reports on important developments in the United States, Canada and around the world. Their purpose is to provide balance and more accurate coverage on culture, life and family matters than is usually given by other media. Available by free daily email subscription and on LifeSiteNews.com.


LifeSiteNews Principles

 

  1. Accuracy in content is given high priority. News and information tips from readers are encouraged and validated. Valid corrections are always welcome. Writing and research is of a professional calibre (sic).

 

  1. LifeSiteNews.com emphasizes the social worth of traditional Judeo-Christian principles but is also respectful of all authentic religions and cultures that esteem life, family and universal norms of morality.

 

  1. LifeSiteNews.com’s writers and its founders, have come to understand that respect for life and family are endangered by an international conflict. That conflict is between radically opposed views of the worth and dignity of every human life and of family life and community. It has been caused by secularists attempting to eliminate Christian morality and natural law principles which are seen as the primary obstacles to implementing their new world order.

 

  1. LifeSiteNews.com understands that abortion, euthanasia, cloning, homosexuality and all other moral, life and family issues are all interconnected in an international conflict affecting all nations, even at the most local levels. LifeSiteNews attempts to provide its readers with the big picture and the most useful and up-to-date information on this conflict.

 

  1. LifeSiteNews.com attempts to dispel confusion and ignorance, enable constructive dialogue and help informed decisions to be made and appropriate actions to be taken for the good of all.

 

Who Produces LifeSiteNews?

 

The service was originally started by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC), a  READ THE REST

 

Donate to Life Site News