Constitutionally Overrule SCOTUS on Abortion


jesus-crucified-in-the-womb

John R. Houk

© August 16, 2012

 

How do we overturn the abortion flood opened by Roe v. Wade? Take the Supreme Court out of the equation by Congress defining life begins at conception just as the Bible declares. Congress can do this without an Amendment to the Constitution by enacting a Bill.

 

1 “Listen, O coastlands, to Me,
And take heed, you peoples from afar!
The Lord has called Me from the womb;
From the matrix of My mother He has made mention of My name.
2 And He has made My mouth like a sharp sword;
In the shadow of His hand He has hidden Me,
And made Me a polished shaft;
In His quiver He has hidden Me.” (Isa. 49: 1-2
NKJV)

 

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
Before you were born I sanctified you;
I ordained you a prophet to the nations.” (Jer. 1: 5
NKJV)

 

Senator Rand Paul is circulating a petition to show Congress that voters are more Pro-Life than kill the unborn baby. Now we all know the purpose of the petition is a fund raiser; nonetheless imagine if there was viral Internet support to work around the Supreme Court constitutionally. You can read Rand Paul’s stand on abortion/Pro-Life from his Senate-Govt. website HERE.

 

VIDEO: Rand Paul on the Life at Conception Act

 

 

Senator Rand Paul petition sign-up HERE

 

Left Wing liar-crook Senator Reid is the current Senate Majority leader by virtue of the Dems being the majority in the Senate. As you know the Dems elicit their pro-abortion stance by not recognizing a fetus is a human life and thus a woman has a right to choose to get rid of that nuisance organ produced by sex with a male. Senator Reid has made no bones about it – he will block any Life Begins at Conception legislation in the Senate.

 

The NPLA information below is a little dated yet still is a good description on how a Life Begins at Conception Act would work.

 

JRH 8/16/12

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Legislatively Overturning Roe v. Wade with a Life at Conception Act

A Frontal Assault on Roe v. Wade’s Protection of Abortion-on-Demand

 

 

By National Pro-Life Alliance

 

For more than thirty years, nine unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

  

The result has been a brutal holocaust that has claimed the lives of more than 55 million innocent and helpless unborn children in America.

  

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation’s throat.

   

As a result, many pro-lifers resigned themselves to protecting a life here and there — passing laws which slightly regulate abortion in the most outrageous cases. Others tiptoed around the Supreme Court, hoping they wouldn’t be offended.

 

Life at Conception Act Follows the High Court’s Instructions by Defining When Life Begins

   

Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

   

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion by using the Constitution instead of amending it.

   

A simple majority vote in both houses of Congress is all that is needed to pass a Life at Conception Act as opposed to the two-thirds required to add a Constitutional amendment.

   

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined “right of privacy” which it “discovered” in so-called “emanations” of “penumbrae” of the Constitution.

   

Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster. But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a Constitutional right.

   

Instead the Supreme Court said:

 

“We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man’s knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”

 

Life at Conception Act Would Dismantle Roe Using the Supreme Court’s Own Language

   

Then the High Court made a key admission:

 

“If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case [i.e. “Roe” who sought the abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.”

   

That’s exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

   

A Life at Conception Act changes the focus of the abortion debate. It takes the Supreme Court out of the equation and places responsibility squarely on the shoulders of the elected representatives who, unlike life term judges, must respond to grass-roots pressure.

  

National Pro-Life Alliance members have led the fight to end abortion-on-demand by passing a Life at Conception Act. They have generated over 1.5 million petitions to Congress to date urging lawmakers to cosponsor and fight for passage of a Life at Conception Act.

 

Fight to Overturn Roe v. Wade Heats Up in Congress

   

Those continued efforts have led to ever-increasing support for a Life at Conception Act in Congress. In the 112th Session of Congress, Pro-life Members of Congress introduced Life at Conception Acts – in both the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.

   

Thanks to the grassroots lobbying of National Pro-Life Alliance members, the Life at Conception Act was introduced with an all time record number of cosponsors, in both houses. And NPLA members will continue to hold the politicians accountable, pushing for an up or down vote on a Life at Conception Act.

   

In the U.S. Senate, pro-life floor leader Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) introduced the Life at Conception Act, S. 91.

   

Behind the two Life at Conception Act bills in the House are Congressman Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA) and Congressman Paul Broun (R-GA). By introducing H.R. 374, Congressman Duncan D. Hunter, the son of former Life at Conception Act sponsor Duncan L. Hunter, is following in his father’s footsteps.

   

Hunter serves as the Representative of the 52nd Congressional District of California, the post held by his father prior to his retirement in 2007.

   

Congressman Paul Broun, the author of H.R. 212, is a former medical doctor who entered the political arena in 2007.

   

Congressman Broun has since sought to use his medical expertise to legally establish the scientific fact that conception marks the creation of a genetically unique human being, who should be guaranteed Constitutional protection under the 14th Amendment.

   

An up or down vote on the Life at Conception Act will put politicians on record either for or against ending abortion-on-demand.

  

Pro-lifers are urged to call (202) 224-3121 and insist that their Congressmen cosponsor H.R. 374 and H.R. 212, and that their Senators cosponsor S. 91 today…

 

§  Click here to download talking points on the Life at Conception Act

 

§  Click here to see if your Senator is a co-sponsor of the Life at Conception Act

 

§  Click here to see if your Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Life at Conception Act

 

§  Click here to download Roger Wicker’s Life at Conception Act, S. 91

 

§  Click here to download Duncan Hunter’s Life at Conception Act, H.R. 374

 

§  Click here to download Paul Broun’s Life at Conception Act, H.R. 212

 

______________________________

Constitutionally Overrule SCOTUS on Abortion

John R. Houk

© August 16, 2012

_______________________________

Legislatively Overturning Roe v. Wade with a Life at Conception Act

 

National Pro-Life Alliance Homepage

 

NPLA Mission:

 

Because every human life is precious in the eyes of God, and science and common sense dictate that life begins at conception, it is clear that abortion is the wanton taking of human life and no truly great nation can allow this practice to take place.

   

Ever since the dreadful Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, more than 55 million precious unborn babies have lost their lives.

   

The National Pro-Life Alliance’s members, staff and volunteers are dedicated to halting this slaughter once and for all. And despite the many remaining obstacles, there is light at the end of the tunnel.

 

National Pro-Life Alliance’s Focus Is Passing Substantive Pro-Life Legislation

   

The National Pro-Life Alliance occupies a unique and important role in the pro-life movement. The focus of READ THE REST

If Bachmann is a McCarthyist then she is in Good Company


Radical shhhh

John R. Houk

© July 23, 2012

 

I received an email from ACT for America that encourages readers to continue pressure on Congress to support Rep. Michele Bachmann’s call for an investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating sensitive areas of the U.S. government especially since the MB is no friend of the USA.

 

Within the letter is a link to a David N. Bossie article that addresses the accusation that Bachmann is engaging in McCarthyism to conduct a political witch hunt against Muslims. Of course the word “McCarthyism” is used as an epithet related to the late Senator Joe McCarthy’s investigations looking for Communists in sensitive areas of government which expanded to a search of influential people outside of government that push a Communist agenda. The McCarthy investigations took place in the 1950s when it was evident the now defunct Soviet Union was interesting in spreading its Stalinist Communism to the USA. The USA-Soviet competition became known as the Cold War which many believe ended with the collapse of the Russian dominated Soviet Union.

 

The thing that Leftist Democrats do not want you to know is that McCarthy was more correct than wrong in looking for Communists in American government. After the Soviet collapse many old Soviet classified document were released to the public that validated McCarthy’s investigation. When Senator McCarthy began receiving resistance because his investigations did begin to extend to civil rights issues (It is not illegal to have a Marxist/Communist world view), then McCarthy began to have a nervous breakdown which ended in the disgrace of alcoholism. Until the little publicized released Soviet documents McCarthy’s name became synonymous with rabid witch hunts looking for people who either did not exist or smearing someone for his beliefs when there is a civil right to have an alternative political world view.

 

So when the American Left (who is still in denial about McCarthy’s validity) brands Bachmann a McCarthyist, they are saying she is engaging in a smear campaign against Muslims. It is a Leftist path to support American enemies wittingly or unwittingly to use Multiculturalism to destroy American culture’s Christian influence.

 

So below I am cross posted Bossie’s article that supports Bachmann’s cause followed by the ACT for America email that calls for more pressure on Congress that will take you to a link to contact your Congressmen to support Rep. Michele Bachmann and her request to see if the Muslim Brotherhood has access to classified information via MB sympathetic Muslims at high levels of government.

 

JRH 7/23/12

Please Support With SlantRight 2.0 Tip Contributions.

**********************************

Michele Bachmann’s McCarthyism?

 

By David N. Bossie President of Citizens United

Jul. 19, 2012

The Arena (Politico)

 

It would be the height of folly if, in the name of political correctness, “diversity,” “multiculturalism” or a fear of giving offense, the government continues to ignore what our enemies say is their intent to subvert us from within – and evidence of their success in doing so.  If anybody is engaging in “McCarthyism,” it is those who seek to pillory and silence the few courageous enough to speak out.

 

An independent FBI report making news this morning states that Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan – an Islamic radical – was NOT investigated by FBI agents before the shooting because of “political correctness.”  This fatal mistake led to the killing of 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009.  National security must trump political correctness; people die when our government fails in its duties because they are worried of offending people.

 

That is why it infuriates me that Sen. McCain and the liberal media blindly attacked Reps. Michele Bachmann, Louie Gohmert, Trent Franks, Lynn Westmoreland and Tom Rooney for doing their jobs. If people actually read the letters they sent (I’m guessing most of the commentators in The ARENA haven’t) to the inspectors general of the State, Justice, Defense and Homeland Security Departments and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence they would see there was no tinge of racism in any of the letters.

 

The inspectors general should absolutely investigate whether individuals with associations with the Muslim Brotherhood are contributing to the adoption of policies that favor an organization that poses a threat to national security. The Muslim Brotherhood is the driving force behind the effort to impose a totalitarian ideology it calls “shariah.” During the Obama presidency, the Brotherhood has made huge strides towards achieving its goal in the Middle East.

 

Unfortunately, as is made clear in their own documents – specifically a strategic plan introduced into evidence in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism financing prosecution in our nation’s history – the Muslim Brotherhood also has as its goal “destroying Western civilization from within.”  This goal is being pursued via what the Brothers call a stealthy “civilization jihad” that involves, among other techniques, gaining access to and influencing government agencies.

 

It is not McCarthyism to state these irrefutable facts. Neither are requests by members of Congress seeking, through the appropriate formal channels, to establish whether the Muslim Brotherhood has gained a foothold and legitimacy – especially in light of the adoption of Brotherhood-friendly policies by the Obama Administration.  These are absolutely legitimate and necessary questions because of the stakes for our national security.

  

Far from being criticized or suppressed by America’s elites and politically correct police, Reps. Bachmann, Gohmert, Franks, Westmoreland and Rooney should be applauded for their letter and be regarded as patriots.

______________________

Update: Grassroots support for Muslim Brotherhood Investigation

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 7/23/2012 10:15 AM

 

IMPORTANT AND TIME-SENSITIVE
LEGISLATIVE ACTION ALERT!

ACT! FOR AMERICA GRASSROOTS MAKE THEIR VOICES
HEARD ON CAPITOL HILL: SEND OVER 10,600 E-MAILS TO
THEIR FEDERAL LEGISLATORS!

 

Over the last few days, ACT! for America’s grassroots have demonstrated a massive force of support for Representative Michele Bachmann and her colleagues Representatives Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Thomas Rooney, and Lynn Westmoreland, who recently called for investigations into the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood within certain federal agencies.

See the congressional letters calling for this investigation by CLICKING HERE.

Last week, we asked you to send an e-mail to your Members of the U.S. Congress in support of the legislators’ request. We also stressed that the tangential issue upon which the mainstream media, as well as other politicos (many of whom should know better) were focusing, should not be the main focal point. The issue is whether the Muslim Brotherhood has positioned itself in our highest levels of government. The American people deserve to know.

David N. Bossie, President of Citizens United, offered what we feel is an excellent assessment of, and response to, the overall issue. We think you’ll enjoy reading it, which you can do by CLICKING HERE.

While 10,600 e-mails to Capitol Hill is a great start, we know that there are many, many more Americans who support an investigation into the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence within our government. The only way our federal legislators are going to understand that this level of support exists is if they hear from their constituents. If you have not yet taken the 5 minutes necessary to make your voice heard in the U.S. Capitol, PLEASE do so now by following the simple steps below.

***Action Item***

Please click HERE to be taken to the Contact Congress page of our website. Click on the Alert in the red box entitled: Support Members of Congress Calling for Muslim Brotherhood Investigation. From there, follow the easy directions and send your e-mails to those who represent you in the House and Senate. It should take no more than 5 minutes of your time.

Note: As you follow the directions to send your e-mail, you will see that we have provided a sample letter addressing this matter. We encourage you to modify the letter as you see fit to personalize it. AS ALWAYS, PLEASE BE RESPECTFUL AND PROFESSIONAL. OTHERWISE, THIS EFFORT WILL NOT BE EFFECTIVE!

Finally, please forward this Alert to everyone you know who shares our concerns about the Muslim Brotherhood and how the U.S. Government is addressing this threat. Through our online system, writing your e-mail will take only a matter of minutes to make your voice heard. And if we ALL act together, it will be a powerful and effective voice that every Member of the U.S. Congress will hear.

Please act NOW! Thank you for all that you do.

REMEMBER, YOUR VOICE COUNTS! IF EACH OF US DOES JUST A LITTLE, TOGETHER WE CAN ACCOMPLISH A LOT!

___________________________

If Bachmann is a McCarthyist then she is in Good Company

John R. Houk

© July 23, 2012

____________________________

Michele Bachmann’s McCarthyism?

 

© 2012 POLITICO LLC

__________________________

Update: Grassroots support for Muslim Brotherhood Investigation

 

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

URGENT – STOP CHANGES TO FBI COUNTERTERRORISM MATERIALS!!!


Terror Lexicon

Click Lexicon for larger image

 

We all know that when President Barack Hussein Obama took Office in January 2009 that he began to dhimmify American government by removing references to the violence that is inherent in the dark side of Islam. Thus Federal government referencing of Radical Islam, Islamic terrorism or the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) were reduced by Big Brother speak something like standard felonious crime of the usual suspects, Enemy Combatants and more.

 

It seems it has taken about three years for the Obama-Islam mentality to filter into the FBI for it seems the nation’s premier law enforcement agency is filtering words that are deemed insulting to Islam when dealing with Muslims.

 

ACT for America has picked up on the new FBI agenda undoubtedly influenced by the Obama Administration. ACT for America wants to make your Congressman and Senator aware of forcing politics rather than the appropriate use of Counterterrorism that would focus on the largest group of terrorists currently functioning within the USA; i.e. the political side of Islam. In Islam the political nature is as important as the religious nature; indeed one can almost say they are interchangeable.

 

JRH 4/19/12

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

URGENT – STOP CHANGES TO FBI COUNTERTERRORISM MATERIALS!!!

 

Sent by ACT for America

Website reference

Sent: Apr 18, 2012 at 11:33 AM

 

Help us STOP proposed changes to FBI counterterrorism training materials!!!

 

URGENT action needed! Add your name to open letter to Congress TODAY!!!

 

According to a recent CQ article (see below, highlights added), FBI leadership is moving forward with a plan that could purge from its counterterrorism training materials “references to Muslims…that it deemed offensive.” As we all know, groups like CAIR want EVERY reference to radical Islam removed because they deem ANY terrorism reference to Islam “offensive.”

We have learned that this potential capitulation by the FBI leadership to politically-correct special interest pressure has some Members of Congress concerned—and they should be.

So are we. And so should you.

With annual congressional hearings addressing the FBI just around the corner, we need to take action NOW to make sure the appropriate congressional committees are aware that there is opposition to these proposed changes from the folks back home. As you know, it’s almost impossible to get Congress to take action on something unless they feel some “heat” from their constituents.

This is why it’s critical we make our voices heard on this important issue NOW! And it’s essential that we speak out loud and strong!

The first step in addressing this issue is an open letter to the chairmen of the appropriate House and Senate committees. Some of these committees are scheduled to hold hearings on the FBI very soon. THEY NEED TO HEAR FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS that making changes to counterterrorism training manuals without any congressional input, to appease political correctness, is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE, because doing so WILL MAKE US LESS SAFE!!!!

 

Please add your name to this open letter and forward it to everyone you know. Please don’t delay. We only have a few weeks to mobilize opposition to these foolish, ill-advised proposed changes before the U.S. Congress discusses issues related to the FBI. We need to be sure that when they do, our federal legislators have the benefit of knowing that many Americans are opposed to these changes.

The Obama administration has already purged all references to radical Islam and jihad from its national strategic threat assessments. We can’t let this happen at the FBI as well. FBI agents in the field need to have training materials that accurately define the threat—for their safety and for ours.

We CAN stop these changes from happening, IF WE ACT.

So please, take action TODAY. It will only take a few moments of your time, but it will have a tremendous impact. Add your name to our open letter to congressional committee chairmen and forward this message to everyone you know!


Afternoon Take: FBI to Change Counterterrorism Training Policies

By Chad Brand, CQ Staff

The FBI is reportedly amending its training materials to eliminate references to Muslims and Arab-Americas that it deemed offensive, a change at least one high-ranking Democratic senator has championed.

The bureau recently notified Congress that it removed the references it deemed offensive, along with language saying that agents had the ability to suspend the law and impinge on the freedoms of others in the course of investigations, the New York Times reported. The story noted that Sen. Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., wrote to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, earlier this week about the training material.

Durbin’s letter raised concerns that an internal review of its training materials by the bureau uncovered evidence of instructions for agents to make assumptions about Islam, Muslims and Arab Americans based on crude stereotypes, including language such as “Islam is a highly violent religion,” and “mainstream American Muslims are likely to be terrorist sympathizers.”

Durbin asked the FBI make the training materials public and hold accountable the individuals responsible for the language deemed offensive.

Rep. Trent Franks, one of a group of House Republicans that has questioned whether the Obama administration’s review of its counterterrorism training policies put politics over security, said he was unhappy with what he called the FBI’s lack of communication with Congress about its training manual reviews. The Arizona Republican said he wants details about who advised the FBI during the process.

“The FBI must not permit outside parties to censor the true or critical material from FBI training curricula just because someone feels it to be politically incorrect,” he told CQ. “We want to know who these outside reviewing parties are, what their affiliations are, and whether they are being permitted in some instances to overrule the judgment of seasoned FBI trainers.”

_________________________________

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

 

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591

www.actforamerica.org

Muslim Nations Regime Changes a Precursor to Abandoning Israel?


Ahmadinejad & BHO on Israel

John R. Houk

© March 16, 2012

 

Danny Jeffrey wrote a post entitled “THE COMING ASSAULT ON ISRAEL…PART TWO”. The theme is that Obama instrumentality in the deposing of Mubarak of Egypt and Qaddafi of Libya are actions that will also lead to the deposing of Assad in Syria. Libya was an Obama test run to perhaps see what would happen if America became involved in Assad’s departure. Jeffrey raises Constitutional questions of Obama’s use of power without Congressional approval (which means without taxpayer/voter approval). Also that Obama’s extra-Constitutional paradigm will ultimately lead to America abandoning Israel to the fate of Jew-hating Muslim nations.

 

Danny I had mixed feelings concerning Libya. Yes, the anti-Qaddafi rebels are emerging Islamist leaders. On the other hand Qaddafi has had his hand in protecting and/or utilizing Islamic terrorists for a couple of decades. The Islamic terrorists looked for Jews and Americans. In my opinion Qaddafi had to go. Qaddafi’s departure occurred with a minimum loss of U.S. military personal.

 

Mubarak on the other hand was a staunch American ally even if he was a brutal dictator. If the Egyptians believe that government brutality will be less under a Muslim Brotherhood led government I believe they will be unpleasantly surprised. From my perspective a MB led government will even make things worse for the largest Christian population among Muslim dominated nations. Mubarak’s sell-out by Obama reeks of Carter’s sell-out of the Shah of Iran.

 

Assad of Syria is much like Qaddafi of Libya. Assad has been a patron of Islamic terrorists and a client of America’s greatest enemy in the Middle East in Iran. He has to go.

 

Again, though a problem arises with Assad’s departure, the Syrian rebels that desire to depose Assad are Sunnis that are influenced by Islamists. These rebels have already said that after a victory they would wipe Assad’s Alawite-Shias. This would be followed by returning Islamic hatred toward Israel. Whoever leads Syria will not be beneficial to Israel except perhaps in the momentary confusion that will exist as Sunnis assert government leadership for the first time in half-a-century. The Sunnis are the majority population in Syria.

 

I agree on one though. Obama will sell-out Israel if he is reelected as President of the USA. I believe Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and an Iraq without American troops will begin hostilities with Israel as Islamist ideologies begin to dominate those nations. Israel will be back in the same precarious situation it faced in its 1948 independence when it was invaded by 5 or 6 Jew-hating Muslim nations. President Barack Hussein Obama will not help Israel.

 

I have not read Part One, but I will definitely get to it. You write thought provoking essays. For the most part we agree. It is in the minor details we might see things differently. I thought Qaddafi had to go and I believe Assad has to go. Obama’s use of military power without a commitment of a troop invasion of Libya was a good thing. The question you bring up though is excellent. Was Obama’s actions Constitutional. You provide a good argument for Obama’s military aid to Libya for being unconstitutional in that neither a Declaration of War approved by Congress was forthcoming or any consultation with Congress about using Military resources against Libya. At least President Bush got the democrats on board to invade Afghanistan and Iraq even though a formal Declaration of War was not forthcoming.

 

It is disturbing that the Obama Administration through the voice of Secretary of Defense Panetta that engagement militarily in Syria would be up to NATO or some form of foreign leadership coalition agreement. This is voicing an actual intent to exclude Congress from its Constitutional duty to validate or invalidate taxpayer money for a war to be fought with American resources. If Obama proceeds with such an option it sets a precedent to invest military power into the Executive Branch that has no accountability to a voter elected Congress.

 

Such an Obama action MUST NOT stand!

 

If Danny Jeffrey is correct and the Obama extra-Constitutional paradigm leads Obama to have an excuse to abandon Israel to the fate of Jew-hating Muslim nations of both the Sunni and Shia persuasion, then Obama would have perpetrated one of the most reprehensible cowardly agendas in the history of America’s existence.

 

JRH 3/16/12

The Homosexual Classrooms Act is an Assault on the Constitution and Christianity


Sodom and Gomorrah

 

John R. Houk

© December 21, 2011

 

Homosexual Activists are using the clout of MSM and Hollywood/TV propaganda to brainwash homosexuality is normal and acceptable in American culture. The Homosexual Activist lobby appears to be in the driver’s seat gaining huge support for a bill entitled Student Non-Discrimination Act. Eugene Delgaudio of Public Advocate correctly says [SlantRight Editor: Read Delgaudio at the end of this post at SlantRight 2.0] the bill should be labeled the Homosexual Classrooms Act.

 

The propagandized design for the Bill is to protect deviant homosexuals from discrimination in public schools. The nuts and bolts reality is the Bill forced feeds public school students to accept the homosexual lifestyle as normal rather than the Biblical description as an abomination. Because of Judicial precedents utilizing a Left Wing secularist interpretation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Homosexual Activists are making sure public school students do not hear that Christian Biblical faith speaks of homosexuality as deviant sin against God.

 

Regardless of what atheists, Secular Humanists and Separation of Church-State morons will tell you, the United States of America has a Christian Foundation in its colonial beginnings and the foundation thoughts of the Founding Father’s including those Founders involved in writing the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

 

[W]e have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. . . . Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. (John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, editor (Boston: Little, Brown, 1854), Vol. IX, p. 401, to Zabdiel Adams on June 21, 1776.)

 

Our liberty depends on our education, our laws, and habits . . . it is founded on morals and religion, whose authority reigns in the heart, and on the influence all these produce on public opinion before that opinion governs rulers. (Fisher Ames – Framer of the First Amendment; An Oration on the Sublime Virtues of General George Washington (Boston: Young & Minns, 1800), p. 23.)

 

Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime & pure, [and] which denounces against the wicked eternal misery, and [which] insured to the good eternal happiness, are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments. (Charles Carroll of Carrollton – Signer of the Declaration of Independence; Bernard C. Steiner, The Life and Correspondence of James McHenry (Cleveland: The Burrows Brothers, 1907), p. 475. In a letter from Charles Carroll to James McHenry of November 4, 1800.)

 

[T]he primary objects of government are the peace, order, and prosperity of society. . . . To the promotion of these objects, particularly in a republican government, good morals are essential. Institutions for the promotion of good morals are therefore objects of legislative provision and support: and among these . . . religious institutions are eminently useful and important. . . . [T]he legislature, charged with the great interests of the community, may, and ought to countenance, aid and protect religious institutions—institutions wisely calculated to direct men to the performance of all the duties arising from their connection with each other, and to prevent or repress those evils which flow from unrestrained passion. (Oliver Ellsworth – Chief-Justice of the Supreme Court; Connecticut Courant, June 7, 1802, p. 3, Oliver Ellsworth, to the General Assembly of the State of Connecticut)

 

I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings, that “except the Lord build the House, they labor in vain that build it.” I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better, than the Builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and bye word down to future ages. And what is worse, mankind may hereafter from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing governments by human wisdom and leave it to chance, war and conquest.

 

I therefore beg leave to move that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations be held in this Assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the clergy of this city be requested to officiate in that service. (Benjamin Franklin – at Constitutional Convention; James Madison, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Max Farrand, editor (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1911), Vol. I, pp. 450-452, June 28, 1787.)

 

Give up money, give up fame, give up science, give the earth itself and all it contains rather than do an immoral act. And never suppose that in any possible situation, or under any circumstances, it is best for you to do a dishonorable thing, however slightly so it may appear to you. Whenever you are to do a thing, though it can never be known but to yourself, ask yourself how you would act were all the world looking at you, and act accordingly. Encourage all your virtuous dispositions, and exercise them whenever an opportunity arises, being assured that they will gain strength by exercise, as a limb of the body does, and that exercise will make them habitual. From the practice of the purest virtue, you may be assured you will derive the most sublime comforts in every moment of life, and in the moment of death. (Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Albert Bergh, editor (Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Assoc., 1903), Vol. 5, pp. 82-83, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr on August 19, 1785.)

 

I concur with the author in considering the moral precepts of Jesus as more pure, correct, and sublime than those of ancient philosophers. (Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Albert Bergh, editor (Washington, D. C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Assoc., 1904), Vol. X, pp. 376-377. In a letter to Edward Dowse on April 19, 1803.)

 

[P]ublic utility pleads most forcibly for the general distribution of the Holy Scriptures. The doctrine they preach, the obligations they impose, the punishment they threaten, the rewards they promise, the stamp and image of divinity they bear, which produces a conviction of their truths, can alone secure to society, order and peace, and to our courts of justice and constitutions of government, purity, stability and usefulness. In vain, without the Bible, we increase penal laws and draw entrenchments around our institutions. Bibles are strong entrenchments. Where they abound, men cannot pursue wicked courses, and at the same time enjoy quiet conscience. (James McHenry – Signer of the Constitution; Bernard C. Steiner, One Hundred and Ten Years of Bible Society Work in Maryland, 1810-1920 (Maryland Bible Society, 1921), p. 14.)

 

The only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid in religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments. (Benjamin Rush – Signer of the Declaration of Independence; Essays, Literary, Moral and Philosophical (Philadelphia: Printed by Thomas and William Bradford, 1806), pp. 93-94.)

 

By renouncing the Bible, philosophers swing from their moorings upon all moral subjects. . . . It is the only correct map of the human heart that ever has been published. . . . All systems of religion, morals, and government not founded upon it [the Bible] must perish, and how consoling the thought, it will not only survive the wreck of these systems but the world itself. “The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.” [Matthew 1:18] (Benjamin Rush, Letters of Benjamin Rush, L. H. Butterfield, editor (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951), p. 936, to John Adams, January 23, 1807.)

 

While just government protects all in their religious rights, true religion affords to government its surest support. (George Washington – Father of Our Country; The Writings of George Washington, John C. Fitzpatrick, editor (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1932), Vol. XXX, p. 432 n., from his address to the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church in North America, October 9, 1789.)

 

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of man and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice?

 

And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric? (George Washington – Father of Our Country; Address of George Washington, President of the United States . . . Preparatory to His Declination (Baltimore: George and Henry S. Keatinge), pp. 22-23. In his Farewell Address to the United States in 1796.)

 

Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other. The divine law, as discovered by reason and the moral sense, forms an essential part of both. (James Wilson – Signer of the Constitution; The Works of the Honourable James Wilson (Philadelphia: Bronson and Chauncey, 1804), Vol. I, p. 106.)

 

The Above Quotes from WallBuilders

 

President James Madison was the primary framer and defender of making the Constitution the law of the land. Madison was huge on equal rights for all religions and all Christian denominations (or sects). Many a Secular Humanist will thus point out that Madison was big on separation of Church and State. AND in a many he was big on the Church-State separation; however not in the manner that activist Left Wing Judges have reinterpreted Original Intent. Madison wanted government to stay out of the religion business but fully expected Christianity to be an influence on the rule of law.

 

“Waiving the rights of conscience, not included in the surrender implied by the social state, & more or less invaded by all Religious establishments, the simple question to be decided, is whether a support of the best & purest religion, the Christian religion itself ought not, so far at least as pecuniary means are involved, to be provided for by the Government, rather than be left to the voluntary provisions of those who profess it.”  (James Madison, referring to the establishment of tax-supported denominations in Religion and Politics in the Early Republic: Jasper Adams and the Church-State Debate, Daniel L. Dreisbach, ed. (Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky, 1996), p. 117. [1st emphasis SlantRight – 2nd emphasis James Madison Quotes])

 

In 1812, President Madison signed a federal bill which economically aided the Bible Society of Philadelphia in its goal of the mass distribution of the Bible.

 

“An Act for the relief of the Bible Society of Philadelphia” Approved February 2, 1813 by Congress

“It is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other.”  James Madison

 

We hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth “that religion, or the duty which we owe our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.” The religion, then, of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man: and that it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. (— James Madison, A Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, addressed to the Virginia General Assembly, June 20, 1785 in response to an attempt to pass a law that would have instituted the anti-biblical practice of taxing the general population for the support of the church.  Note: The purpose of this bill was to try to help the Protestant Episcopal (Anglican) church with their financial problems.   Today, the same type of tax support has been accomplished quite handily by the Secular Humanist religion, and no James Madison was there to object and stop it from happening.  For more information on the history surrounding this, go here. [Emphasis SlantRight])

 

The Above Quotes from James Madison Quotes

 

Alexander Hamilton was also a supporter of the Constitution becoming the law of the land for the United States of America.

 

“The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States.” Alexander Hamilton

 

On July 12, 1804 at his death, Hamilton said, “I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me.” Alexander Hamilton

 

“For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests.” [Alexander Hamilton, 1787 after the Constitutional Convention]

 

“I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.” Alexander Hamilton

 

Note: Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:

 

(1) Christianity

 

(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity.

 

The Above Quotes from Alexander Hamilton Quotes

 

Anti-Christian and Separation Church-State apologists love to point out a significant number of the America’s Founding Fathers were Deists. Even if it is true that most of the Founding Fathers were Deists, their Deism was quite different than the Deism practiced in Europe. Whatever acceptance or denial of the miraculous inherent in the Holy Bible, the Founding Fathers universally followed the Biblical Moral code. In following the Moral code of the Bible the practice of homosexuality as a normal lifestyle in America would horrify the Founding Fathers.

 

Only a foolish Secular Humanist or Separation of Church-State proponent would deny the strict adherence of the Founding Fathers to Biblical Morality. This is when those that demand that Christianity can have zero to do with the government because of Separation of Church and State will say something like the times are a changing. The U.S. Constitution is a living document don’t you know and thus the rule of law inherent in the Constitution changes according to the evolution of the mores of society.

 

Did the Founding Fathers view the Constitution as a living document?

 

On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.  —Thomas Jefferson

 

The first and governing maxim in the interpretation of a statute is to discover the meaning of those who made it.  —James Wilson, in Of the Study of Law in the United States

 

The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution, which at any time exists, ‘till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. … If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. — George Washington

 

Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so? — James Madison

 

The important distinction so well understood in America, between a Constitution established by the people and unalterable by the government, and a law established by the government and alterable by the government, seems to have been little understood and less observed in any other country. — James Madison

 

Our peculiar security is in possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction. … If it is, then we have no Constitution. — Thomas Jefferson

 

To take a single step beyond the text would be to take possession of a boundless field of power. — Thomas Jefferson (The Founders on a Living Constitution; By Jon Bruning and James Best; What Would The Founders Think?)

 

The Founding Fathers expected the Constitution to be interpreted with the Original Intent in which it was written. The only change to occur in the Constitution was via the Amendment process or another Constitutional Convention to write a new document to replace the last document.

 

This Living Constitution malarkey is an invention of the Left to validate a Socialistic-Secular Humanistic culture despising our Christian foundation to allow such deviancy as homosexuality to be valid and to have special protection from Christians that subscribe to Biblical Morality.

 

We Christians must rise up and be an influence on our government as the Founding Fathers Originally Intended!

 

JRH 12/21/11

Will BHO Continue Useless Sanctions Against Iran?


Iran Missile with wmd potential

 

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2012

 

Iran has hit the news again asserting they shot down an unmanned drone over Iran. The news speculation is that the unmanned drone may have been part of the unmanned stealth weapons. America denies that it was such a weapon like the RQ-170 Sentinel and if there was a drone near the Iran-Afghan border it was a reconnaissance drone that was retrieved after a malfunction.

 

Militaries that are hostile to each have the habit of obfuscating the truth or simply just downright lying. The question is if Iran did shoot down a RQ-170 Sentinel down, did Iran do so over Iran or Afghanistan. If the drone was shot down over Iran, frankly as much as I dislike Iran the case would be it was over sovereign territory. On the other hand if Iran attempted to shoot down any kind of American drone over Afghanistan then Iran stepped another nation’s sovereign territory. And if that is the case, Iran engaged America in military action perhaps to steal the RQ-170 Sentinel technology for itself or to sell to a more scientific capable nation.

 

This is once again one-upmanship of hostility toward the USA and Western nations (which would include Israel). Also since it has become public knowledge that Iran now has the nuke capability to build a nuclear armed weapon, Western nations must get behind America in placing extreme pressure on Iran.

 

If that pressure includes some Israeli sortie raids over Iran, America must stand behind Israel for whatever action Iran may initiate against Israel. Standing behind Israel means support and assistance if Iran unleashes Hezbollah or Hamas or both against Israel as Iranian proxies.

 

I am not a big fan of useless sanctions that America has used against Iran for decades; however this is one sanction that will really bite Iran in the butt. That sanction is against Iran’s central bank which would extremely hinder Iran’s ability to conduct international business deals and transactions.

 

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) sent a letter to President Barack Hussein Obama to have the cajones to take the step of sanctions on Iran’s central bank. Below is the email UANI sent to me.

 

JRH 12/6/11

*****************************

In Letter to White House, UANI Calls on President Obama to Support Sanctions Against Iran’s Central Bank

 

Sent by UANI

Sent: December 5, 2011 2:37 PM

 

New York, NY – On Monday, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) wrote to President Barack Obama, and called on him to support sanctions against Iran’s Central Bank.

 

The Obama administration has been resisting such sanctions, even though all 100 members of the U.S. Senate voted last week to add them by amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act.

 

In a Monday letter to President Obama, UANI President, Ambassador Mark D. Wallace, wrote:

 

… UANI is concerned about recent reports that your administration is opposed to placing comprehensive, robust sanctions against the regime, including against Bank Markazi, Iran’s central bank.  As you are aware, such action has broad support as demonstrated most recently by the unanimous passage in the Senate of an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”), requiring sanctions on financial institutions that do business with Bank Markazi. This amendment followed an earlier letter you received from 92 Senators urging similar action. Bank Markazi is the financial nerve center of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (“IRGC”), the entity directly responsible for Iran’s proliferation procurement efforts and sponsorship of terrorist activities.  There is perhaps no other entity than Bank Markazi which, if sanctioned, would put substantive pressure on the Iranian regime to enter into meaningful negotiations.

 

Any short-term economic disruption that may result from sanctioning Bank Markazi pales in comparison to the disruption that will be unleashed should Iran acquire a nuclear weapon.  While hopefully the United States can persuade other members of the international community to support an imposition of sanctions against Bank Markazi, the imposition of even unilateral sanctions would severely hamper Bank Markazi, and by consequence the IRGC, from operating internationally.

 

Click here to read UANI’s full letter to President Obama.

 

###

 

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 
The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran should concern every American and be unacceptable to the community of nations. Since 1979 the Iranian regime, most recently under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s leadership, has demonstrated increasingly threatening behavior and rhetoric toward the US and the West. Iran continues to defy the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the United Nations in their attempts to monitor its nuclear activities. A number of Arab states have warned that Iran’s development of nuclear weapons poses a threat to Middle East stability and could provoke a regional nuclear arms race. In short, the prospect of a nuclear armed Iran is a danger to world peace.

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

 

The Objectives of United Against a Nuclear Iran

 

1.   Inform the public about the nature of the Iranian regime, including its desire and intent to possess nuclear weapons, as well as Iran’s role as a state sponsor of global terrorism, and a major violator of human rights at home and abroad;

 

2.   Heighten awareness nationally and internationally about the danger that a nuclear armed Iran poses to the region and the world;

 

3.   Mobilize public support, utilize media outreach, and persuade our elected leaders to voice a robust and united American opposition to a nuclear Iran;

 

4.   Lay the groundwork for effective US policies in coordination with European and other allies;

 

5.   Persuade the regime in Tehran to desist from its quest for nuclear weapons, while striving not to punish the Iranian people, and;

 

6.   Promote efforts that focus on vigorous national and international, social, economic, political and diplomatic measures.

 

UANI is led by an advisory board of outstanding national figures representing all sectors of our country.

________________________________

 

Will BHO Continue Useless Sanctions Against Iran?

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2012

_______________________________

In Letter to White House, UANI Calls on President Obama to Support Sanctions Against Iran’s Central Bank

             

American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran | 45 Rockefeller Plaza | New York | NY | 10111

 

Donate to UANI  

How Congress Occupied Wall Street


Capital Building - Corruption

 

CBS and 60 Minutes utilized the investigative work of Peter Schweizer to nudge into the world of political corruption in Congress. That corruption is that Congressmen can use insider tips to enrich themselves and do so legally. If a private citizen utilized the same insider tips quite likely they would be in violation of the law and would face jail, fines or both.

 

Sarah Palin has been anti-government corruption her entire political career. Palin builds on the expose of 60 Minutes and Peter Schweizer to level her own accusation against Congress and Congressional member with a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

 

Palin is still stumping for a better America. Sadly she has removed herself from consideration for the GOP nomination to face President Barack Hussein Obama. Whoever wins the GOP nomination should consider Palin for the Vice President nomination because of what she stands for AND Palin is one heck of a campaigner and motivator.

 

JRH 11/19/11 (Hat Tip: Newsmax)

Crony Capitalism, Schweizer and 60 Minutes


Throw Them All Out bk jacket

 

John R. Houk

© November 15, 2012

 

I received an alert message from Team Sarah concerning Crony Capitalism. The alert centers on Peter Schweizer who was part of an exposé on 60 Minutes about Crony Capitalism. Here is an excerpt of the original email sent by Team Sarah (The link above is an updated message of the original email):

 

Team,

 

It seems that the rest of the media is finally paying attention to the crony capitalism drum that Governor Sarah Palin has been beating for quite some time.  Tonight, 60 Minutes will air an episode that will feature Peter Schweizer, adviser to Governor Sarah Palin, and author of “Throw Them All Out”.

 

CBS news provides the following information on tonight’s show which will air at 7:00 p.m. Eastern:

 

Martha Stewart went to jail for it. Hedge fund honcho Raj Rajaratnam was fined $92 million and will go to jail for years for it. But members of Congress can do the same thing -use non-public information to make stock trades — and there’s no law against it. Steve Kroft reports on how America’s lawmakers can legally make tidy profits on information only they know, simply because they won’t pass a law against themselves. The report will be broadcast on Sunday, Nov. 13 at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

 

Among the revelations in Kroft’s report:

 

* Members of Congress have bought stock in companies while laws that could affect those companies were being debated in the House or Senate.

 

* At least one representative made significant stock purchases the day after he and other members of Congress attended a secret meeting in September 2008, where the Fed chair and the treasury secretary informed them of the imminent global economic meltdown. The meeting was so confidential that cell phones and other digital devices were confiscated before it began. (You can read the rest of the CBS article HERE) 

 

There were several links relating to Crony Capitalism inherent in Congress (Dems & GOP) and the Executive Branch. The reports focus on Obama’s Administration of the Executive Branch but I would not be surprised that there has been Crony Capitalism among several Presidential Administrations over the years in the 20th and 21st centuries.

 

Just so we are all on the same page, let us examine briefly a definition of Crony Capitalism:

 

Crony capitalism is a term describing a capitalist economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, and so forth.

 

Crony capitalism is believed to arise when political cronyism spills over into the business world; self-serving friendships and family ties between businessmen and the government influence the economy and society to the extent that it corrupts public-serving economic and political ideals. (Wikipedia)

 

The definition above seems to focus on the benefits of business from the favoritism of government. In most cases many of benefits if exposed quite probably are illegal for private citizens. Schweizer examines Crony Capitalism through the lenses of benefits for government individuals as noted earlier in Congress and the Executive Branch. In Congress’ case it is totally LEGAL for members of Congress to benefit from economic and stock information for personal enrichment monetarily. I am guessing the Obama Administration does not have the covering of a legal umbrella that will prevent investigations and arrests.

 

Sarah Palin close-up

 

Crony Capitalism is a primary message that had been delivered by Sarah Palin in her Tea Party stumping over the past few years (too bad she opted out of GOP nomination). A good example of this is Sarah Palin herself as heard on Grizzly Coalition Action Report from Blog Talk Radio.

 

Peter Schweizer’s book, articles and news shows appearances are important because he is also getting coverage from the MSM. Schweizer’s coverage of Crony Capitalism gives strength for the existence of the Tea Party Movement (TPM) and TPM’s influence in the Republican Party to give the boot to politicians that insist on the old politics as usual thinking. One of the ways to get a hold of America’s economic woes is to make the rule of law apply to government just as much as to Joe Voter.

 

Below is a Schweizer article on Crony Capitalism followed by the 60 Minutes spot that peers into government Crony Capitalism with a particular focus on Congressional Insider Trading.

 

 

JRH 11/15/11

Tom Smith Comment on Kryzhanovsky – ‘The Professional’ Chapter 4


Mikhail Kryzhanovsky & BHO campaign foto

 

Posted November 6, 2011

 

This is part of the ongoing chapters sent by Tom Smith in comment form to SlantRight.com of Mikhail Kryzhanovsky’s manual – The Professional – for Presidents to attain power, remain in power and deal with power. Since I began editing and posting the chapters that Tom Smith sent me I have ran into a website that is doing the same thing and apparently has received directly content from Kryzhanovsky. That website is Pooler-Georgia-Homepage. Interestingly PGH is not a conspiracy theory or a political blog as much as it is an information website for Pooler, GA. PGH begins with The Professional introduction which includes a disclaimer from PGH. Since the content is from Kryzhanovsky at PGH it is probably closer to its original form than what I am editing from the Tom Smith comment version sent to me. Frankly I am reading the Tom Smith version as I am editing it. I have no idea how many actual chapters there are in The Professional. The only real reason for posting Kryzhanovsky’s manual is to honor my commitment to fairness in comments sent to the SlantRight.com website. From what I have read about Mikhail Kryzhanovsky he is a bit too fantastic to believe; however his focus currently seems to be anti-Obama. That works for me!

 

The PGH website gives two links to Kryzhanovsky websites if you believe his stuff:

 

WhiteHouseKGB.com

 

Barack Obama 2012 – Kryzhanovsky blog

 

Here are the three chapters I have posted to date:

 

Chapter 1

 

Chapter 2

 

Chapter 3

 

Video: Mikhail Kryzhanovsky, KGB, rules USA

Chapter 4 on SlantRight 2.0

 

JRH 11/6/11

What did Pakistan know??


ACT for America wants Congress to investigate how Usama bin Laden lived next to a Pakistani military institution and not have a clue how UBL went undetected. ACT for America needs your help with a petition to place some political pressure on members of Congress to conduct such an investigation.

 

JRH 5/4/11