Ted Cruz Calls for Vote Fraud Probe


Voter Fraud MS - Cochran & McDaniel

Intro to ‘Ted Cruz Calls for Vote Fraud Probe’

Editor John R. Houk

July 9, 2014

 

Much of America might actually be unaware of the obvious voter fraud that took place in Mississippi in the GOP run-off election between incumbent Senator Thad Cochran and challenger Chris McDaniel (a local State Senator). Senator Cochran represents the Republican Establishment and McDaniel was highly supported by the Tea Party Movement. With what you have read so far, who do you think committed the vote fraud and who do you think was the victim?

 

DUH! McDaniel was the victim.

 

VIDEO (audio of Hannity Radio): Chris McDaniel on Election Fraud in Mississippi • Allen West • 7/3/14

 

 

Published by iizthatiiz

Published Jul 3, 2014

 

July 3rd, 2014 • Senator Chris McDaniel discussed the widespread accusations of election fraud in last week’s run-off primary against Senator Thad Cochran. McDaniel spoke with former Congressman Allen West as to the multiple allegations regarding illegal voting, vote buying, and corruption that occurred in the Mississippi election.

 

The Tea Party organization Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) sent one of those fund raising emails today. As usual I’ll leave the fund raising decision to you the reader. I am neither endorsing a donation nor telling you to be supportive of CCC. But also as usual CCC provides some very relevant info on the goings on of Dems, the GOP Establishment and the effect on the Tea Party Movement.

 

In this CCC email you will learn that McDaniel lawyers are very confident that a new run-off vote will take place between Cochran and McDaniel.

 

JRH 7/9/14

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Ted Cruz Calls for Vote Fraud Probe

 

Sent by CCC

Sent 7/9/2014 3:11 PM

 

Great news, friends, as Ted Cruz calls for a voter fraud probe in Mississippi, where serious allegations have emerged that could result in a “redo” of the runoff election between the establishment’s Thad Cochran and Conservative Republican Chris McDaniel.

 

McClatchy article - T Cruz wants vote fraud probe... foto

 

McDaniel’s campaign has already found more 5,000 improper votes cast, and tens of thousands of more votes are now in question – far in excess of Thad Cochran’s margin of victory on the day of the runoff election.

Election attorneys employed by McDaniel campaigns have said that if they find additional improperly cast ballots than a redo of the runoff election is likely.  True The Vote and FreedomWorks have already filed suit regarding the election.

Lloyd Marcus, Chairman of the Conservative Campaign Committee, issued a statement commenting on the conduct by the Cochran campaign:  “There are very serious allegations of voting irregularities and also possible illegal conduct in this runoff election.  The voters of Mississippi deserve a fair, clean and honest election – they deserve to have their votes count and their voices heard.

“And when there is a new runoff election ordered, I have words of advice to Thad Cochran’s campaign team:  don’t you ever again use the tactics of the Left and play the race card against conservatives like Chris McDaniel and the tea party movement.

“Conservative black activists such as myself, Dr. Ben Carson, Congressman Allen West, Kevin Jackson, Ambassador Alan Keyes, Niger Innis and countless others have worked for years to show how conservative principles of self-empowerment and liberty are the best prescription for not just the success of our nation, but for prosperity and success for minority communities.

“Thad Cochran’s campaign shamelessly undermined that effort by echoing the sentiments of the liberal media and leftist activists by labeling Chris McDaniel and the tea party movement as racist, hateful and harmful towards minorities – and that is a bald face lie,” Marcus concluded.

 

 Above-  Lloyd Marcus with Chris McDaniel at a Mississippi tea party rally

Above:  Lloyd Marcus with Chris McDaniel at a Mississippi tea party rally

 

These new developments lead us to this question:  do you want to see the fight for a new election or write-in campaign for Chris McDaniel to take place?

If so, please make a contribution so we can launch an effort to secure a new – and fair – Republican Primary Runoff election.  You can make a contribution online – HERE

 

Chris McDaniel for U.S. Senate: We were proud to work hard to win every vote we could for Chris McDaniel.  Below is the radio ad we aired on 14 stations across Mississippi:

 

VIDEO: Chris McDaniel radio ad by CCC PAC

 

 

We distributed our “Conservative Campaign Committee Endorses Chris McDaniel” signs to voters in Mississippi:

 Conservative Campaign Committee Endorses Chris McDaniel signs to voters in Mississippi

 

We took to the streets, spending Election Day waving signs and urging people to head to the polls to vote for Chris McDaniel:

spending Election Day waving signs and urging people to head to the polls to vote for Chris McDaniel

 

 

Our Chairman, Lloyd Marcus, wrote columns urging conservatives to rally behind Chris McDaniel,y.  You can read one such column published at American Thinker – HERE.

 

American Thinker & Lloyd Marcus byline foto

 

Phone From Home

 

We also targeted the 11 most important counties with our Phone From Home program. And had supporters from all across America making phone calls that turned out tens of thousands of Republican votes for Chris McDaniel.

 

Our Chris McDaniel for Senate War Room Where We Ran Our Phone-From-Home Program

Above:  Our Chris McDaniel for Senate War Room Where We Ran Our Phone-From-Home Program

 

Should Chris McDaniel Keep The Fight Going?

 

So should there be a new election?  Should Chris McDaniel be the GOP’s nominee in the general election if more voting irregularities are discovered?

Let us know if you want us to help continue the fight by making a contribution to carry on the fight for Chris McDaniel.  You can contribute online – HERE

 

If you prefer you can also mail in a contribution to our headquarters:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee
ATTN: Support Chris McDaniel
P.O. Box 278855
Sacramento, CA 95827

______________________________

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee:  www.ConservativeCampaign.org

The House should Investigate and Subpoena Obama Administration to the Hilt


BHO calls scandals - Americans Call Crimes

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2014

 

In a recent Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) fundraising email I discovered even more SMOKING GUN evidence that the entirety of the Obama Administration conspired to lie about the Benghazi attack to American voters for political reasons. The CCC email doesn’t harp on the political reasons as I think it should. You have to realize the political reasons were to ensure the reelection of Comrade Obama as the President of the United States of America in November 2012. The Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack on the diplomatic annex was a planned attack on September 11, 2012. Obama tried to make that attack appear to voters that the Islamic terrorist attack in Benghazi was a spontaneous motivated riot due to a sophomoric made Youtube video produced in America that was designed to be provocatively racist against Islam.

 

If you have ever gotten to see what is billed as a Youtube trailer before it was yanked you know the video is so poorly made that it is almost humorous. Unfortunately Free Speech in Islam’s Sharia Law is blasphemous so it is true Muslims were offended. SO WHAT! The Obama Administration has forced American Christians to participate in so many offensive measures from killing unborn lives (taxpayer supported abortions), forcing Christian Hospitals to perform abortions on demand, to force businesses owned by Christians to cater to the service needs of homosexuals even though that lifestyle is an oft repeated abomination to the Presence of God in the Holy Bible and more.

 

Christian Rights are vacated in the name multicultural acceptance. Christians are forced to absorb the mirth of atheistic Leftists and abortionists, Muslims spewing hate toward Christians (See Also HERE), homosexuals spewing hate toward Biblical Christians and more.

 

AND YET when a Christian or Counterjihad writer exposes what the actual Quran, Hadith and Sira of Islam do proclaim, it is called hate-speech or bigoted Islamophobia! (See Also HERE and HERE)

 

I have no doubts that the Obama Administration tried to both assuage Muslims and fool American voters that his Presidency is totally supportive of a Muslim’s right to go crazy due to multicultural deference.

 

Is lying to voters to gain an election victory a crime in the USA?

 

This is not just executive overreach. In many cases, Obama’s exercise of authoritarian power is criminal. His executive branch is responsible for violations of the Arms Export Control Act in shipping weapons to Syria, the Espionage Act in Libya, and IRS law with regard to the targeting of conservative groups. His executive branch is guilty of involuntary manslaughter in Benghazi and in the Fast and Furious scandal, and bribery in its allocation of waivers in Obamacare and tax dollars in its stimulus spending. His administration is guilty of obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

 

And yet nothing is done. (Prosecute the President; By Ben Shapiro; FrontPage Mag; 6/12/14)

 

That excerpt above lists only a fraction of the legal infractions committed either by President Obama’s direction and/or Obama’s Executive Branch. And there is no criminal investigations! Why?

 

PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY FROM JUDICIAL DIRECTION

 

By the decision of the Court in Mississippi v. Johnson,720 in 1867, the President was placed beyond the reach of judicial direction, either affirmative or restraining, in the exercise of his powers, whether constitutional or statutory, political or otherwise, save perhaps for what must be a small class of powers that are purely ministerial.721 An application for an injunction to forbid President Johnson to enforce the Reconstruction Acts, on the ground of their unconstitutionality, was answered by Attorney General Stanberg, who argued, inter alia, the absolute immunity of the President from judicial process.722 The Court refused to permit the filing, using language construable as meaning that the President was not reachable by judicial process but which more fully paraded the horrible consequences were the Court to act. First noting the limited meaning of the term “ministerial,” the Court observed that “[v]ery different is the duty of the President in the exercise of the power to see that the laws are faithfully executed, and among these laws the acts named in the bill. . . . The duty thus imposed on the President is in no just sense ministerial. It is purely executive and political.

 

“An attempt on the part of the judicial department of the government to enforce the performance of such duties by the President might be justly characterized, in the language of Chief Justice Marshall, as ‘an absurd and excessive extravagance.’

 

 

Rare has been the opportunity for the Court to elucidate its opinion in Mississippi v. Johnson, and, in the Watergate tapes case,724 it held the President amenable to subpoena to produce evidence for use in a criminal case without dealing, except obliquely,[p.580]with its prior opinion. The President’s counsel had argued the President was immune to judicial process, claiming “that the independence of the Executive Branch within its own sphere . . . insulates a President from a judicial subpoena in an ongoing criminal prosecution, and thereby protects confidential Presidential communications.”725 However, the Court held, “neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high–level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”726 The primary constitutional duty of the courts “to do justice in criminal prosecutions” was a critical counterbalance to the claim of presidential immunity and to accept the President’s argument would disturb the separation–of–powers function of achieving “a workable government” as well as “gravely impair the role of the courts under Art. III.”727

 

Present throughout the Watergate crisis, and unresolved by it, was the question of the amenability of the President to criminal prosecution prior to conviction upon impeachment.728 It was argued that the impeachment clause necessarily required indictment and trial in a criminal proceeding to follow a successful impeachment and that a President in any event was uniquely immune from indictment, and these arguments were advanced as one ground to deny enforcement of the subpoenas running to the President.729 Assertion of the same argument by Vice President Agnew was controverted by the Government, through the Solicitor General, but, as to the President, it was argued that for a number of constitutional [p.581]and practical reasons he was not subject to ordinary criminal process.730

 

Finally, most recently, the Court has definitively resolved one of the intertwined issues of presidential accountability. The President is absolutely immune in actions for civil damages for all acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official duties.731 The Court’s close decision was premised on the President’s “unique position in the constitutional scheme,” that is, it was derived from the Court’s inquiry of a “kind of ‘public policy’ analysis” of the “policies and principles that may be considered implicit in the nature of the President’s office in a system structured to achieve effective government under a constitutionally mandated separation of powers.”732 … Although the Court relied in part upon its previous practice of finding immunity for officers, such as judges, as to whom the Constitution is silent, although a long common–law history exists, and in part upon historical evidence, which it admitted was fragmentary and ambiguous,734 the Court’s principal focus was upon the fact that the President was distinguishable from all other executive officials. He is charged with a long list of “supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,”735 and diversion of his energies by concerns with private lawsuits would “raise unique risks to the effective functioning of government.”736

 

Supplement: [P. 582, add to text following n.738:]

 

Unofficial Conduct.—In Clinton v. Jones,9 the Court, in a case of first impression, held that the President did not have qualified immunity from suit for conduct alleged to have taken place prior to his election to the Presidency, which would entitle him to delay of both the trial and discovery. The Court held that its precedents affording the President immunity from suit for his official conduct—primarily on the basis that he should be enabled to perform his duties effectively without fear that a particular decision might give rise to personal liability— were inapplicable in this kind of case. Moreover, the separation–of–powers doctrine did not require a stay of all private actions against the President. Separation of powers is preserved by guarding against the encroachment or aggrandizement of one of the coequal branches of the Government at the expense of another. However, a federal trial court tending to a civil suit in which the President is a party performs only its judicial function, not a function of another branch. No decision by a trial court could curtail the scope of the President’s powers. The trial court, the Supreme Court observed, had sufficient powers to accommodate the President’s schedule and his workload, so as not to impede the President’s performance of his duties. Finally, the Court stated its belief that allowing such suits to proceed would not generate a large volume of politically motivated harassing and frivolous litigation. Congress has the power, the Court advised, if it should think necessary to legislate, to afford the President protection.10 (CRS ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION: Article II — Table of Contents; From Cornel University Law School, Legal information Institute)

 

Sifting through the legalese I am assuming that means the POTUS cannot be prosecuted for a crime but can be subject to a civil suit as long as it does not interfere with his Executive Branch duties. After his term of Office has expired then he may be subject to criminal proceedings. This is the unofficial reason President Gerald Ford gave President Richard Milhous Nixon a full pardon from any crimes committed while in Office. A sitting President that breaks the law can receive the equivalent of a political indictment called impeachment in the House of Representatives. The Senate acts as the equivalent of a political jury with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court acting as Judge. A Senate conviction ONLY means a removal from Office. Then criminal proceedings can be executed judicially.

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

 

The U.S. Constitution provides impeachment as the method for removing the president, vice president, federal judges, and other federal officials from office. The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives and follows these steps:

 

1.      The House Judiciary Committee holds hearings and, if necessary, prepares articles of impeachment. These are the charges against the official.

 

2.      If a majority of the committee votes to approve the articles, the whole House debates and votes on them.

 

3.      If a majority of the House votes to impeach the official on any article, then the official must then stand trial in the Senate.

 

4.      For the official to be removed from office, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict the official. Upon conviction, the official is automatically removed from office and, if the Senate so decides, may be forbidden from holding governmental office again.

 

 

The impeachment process is political in nature, not criminal. Congress has no power to impose criminal penalties on impeached officials. But criminal courts may try and punish officials if they have committed crimes.

 

The Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment. They are “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” To be impeached and removed from office, the House and Senate must find that the official committed one of these acts.

 

The Constitution defines treason in Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1:

 

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

 

The Constitution does not define bribery. It is a crime that has long existed in English and American common law. It takes place when a person gives an official money or gifts to influence the official’s behavior in office. For example, if defendant Smith pays federal Judge Jones $10,000 to find Smith not guilty, the crime of bribery has occurred.

 

 

What are “high crimes and misdemeanors”? On first hearing this phrase, many people probably think that it is just an 18th century way of saying “felonies and misdemeanors.” Felonies are major crimes and misdemeanors are lesser crimes. If this interpretation were correct, “high crimes and misdemeanors” would simply mean any crime. But this interpretation is mistaken.

 

The Origins of the Phrase

 

 

But the committee’s recommendation did not satisfy everyone. George Mason of Virginia proposed adding “maladministration.” He thought that treason and bribery did not cover all the harm that a president might do. He pointed to the English case of Warren Hastings, whose impeachment trial was then being heard in London. Hastings, the first Governor General of Bengal in India, was accused of corruption and treating the Indian people brutally.

 

Madison objected to “maladministration.” He thought this term was so vague that it would threaten the separation of powers. Congress could remove any president it disagreed with on grounds of “maladministration.” This would give Congress complete power over the executive.

 

Mason abandoned “maladministration” and proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors against the state.” The convention adopted Mason’s proposal, but dropped “against the state.” The final version, which appears in the Constitution, stated: “The president, vice-president, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

 

The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. …

 

After the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution had to be ratified by the states. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of essays, known as the Federalist Papers, urging support of the Constitution. In Federalist No. 65, Hamilton explained impeachment. He defined impeachable offenses as “those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

 

… (High Crimes and Misdemeanors; From Constitutional Rights Foundation; © 2014 CRF-USA)

 

Finding a crime directly linked to a sitting POTUS is difficult for justice to be maintained. President Barack Hussein Obama has pushed the criminal envelope to the limits and appears near untouchable because of the blathering love of most of America’s media and the love of political power by the most Left Wing Democratic Party in American history. I am surprised the numerous “phony scandals” has not produced links to actual murder in the name of political power. Thank God so far, that extant of nefarious scandalous illegalities has not come up pertaining to President BHO.  

 

The CCC email I referenced at the beginning of these thoughts exposes the fact that the Islamic terrorists that attacked Libyan Embassy annex in Benghazi had acquired stolen “State Department-issued cell phones from our U.S. diplomatic facility”. The Islamic terrorists utilized these phones to coordinate their attack on the annex mission that resulted in the murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. The implication of the CCC email is that America’s Intelligence Community was listening to the Islamic attack coordination! This is another nail in the coffin of lies that exposes Obama and his Administration KNOWINGLY LYING to the American public just prior to the November 2012 election!

 

This is a ton of political evidence to bring Obama to an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives. BUT just like the Democrats in the Senate protected President Slick Willie Clinton from a Senate conviction, the same scenario would undoubtedly take place today in the Senate. EVEN if the GOP retakes the majority in the Senate there will be enough Democrats to ensure that a TWO-THIRDS majority would not be achieved to convict Obama and remove the most corrupt President from Office.

 

That leaves the only way for Obama to receive some justice for his criminal management of this Administration will be via the Civil Suit and/or criminal charges AFTER his term of Office ends in January 2017. AND there is a good chance Obama would escape that post-Presidential justice if a Democrat actually wins the 2016 election for President. Do you think someone like Hillary Clinton will allow civil or criminal discovery of Obama Administration law breaking to go on the public record? NO! A President Hillary would take a page out of the Republican playbook and give Obama a blanket full pardon preventing any kind of investigation from proceeding with the power of the independent Judicial Branch.

 

KNOWING these potential unjustified outcomes I say proceed with House impeachment proceedings at least after the 2014 election cycle to get something on the public record. Public revelations will make it more difficult for Hillary to become President and at the very least allow public opinion to force the Judicial Branch into action civilly or criminally.

 

JRH 6/15/14

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

New Benghazi Scandal Revelations

 

From: Office of CCC PAC

Sent: 6/14/2014 3:35 PM

 

Fox News has a stunning new report that shows that the Benghazi terrorists stole the State Department-issued cell phones from our U.S. diplomatic facility that they had attacked – and they used the phones to coordinate their attack with fellow terrorists.

But the most shocking aspect of the new report is that American intelligence agencies were listening in to the calls – and KNEW instantly that the attack on our compound in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

 

US Spy Agencies Here Benghazi Plans - Obama Lied

 

These stunning new reports are further proof that the Obama administration lied to us about the Benghazi attacks, and then tried to cover up the fact that it was indeed a terrorist attack, and not a political rally in response to a YouTube video.

Please, do not let those four Americans who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 be forgotten, swept under the rug by Democrat politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama who don’t want the American people to know about the lies and cover ups surrounding that horrific terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Please review our TV ad below demanding that Barack Obama be held accountable for the Benghazi cover up, and if you want us to keep the pressure on the Obama administration for this scandal, make a contribution to our TV ad campaign – HERE.

 

VIDEO: TV Ad: Hold Obama Accountable for Benghazi Scandal

 

You can help us keep these ads running on the airwaves by making a contribution of any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000. 

To make a contribution online – JUST CLICK HERE.

Ever since the Benghazi terrorist attack the Obama administration, with significant backing from the liberal media, have attempted to hide the truth about what happened.  To cover their failures in combating terrorism, they told lies saying it was not a preplanned terrorist attack, even when they knew that to be an absolute falsehood.

 

Susan Rice- Benghazi Not Preplanned Attack

 

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and countless members of the Obama administration have lied, concealed and attempted to cover up not only the truth but their failures.  As has been his pattern of appeasement in the face of Islamic terrorism, Obama himself would not even call this an act of terrorism.

 

USA Today- BHO says Benghazi Not Terrorism

 

Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said it didn’t matter whether Benghazi was a terrorist attack or whether she and the Obama administration had lied about it.

 

Hillary- What Diff Does It Make

 

The Obama administration has dishonored those who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 and now they say it doesn’t matter because it happened “a long time ago.”

 

Jay Carney- Benghazi Happened Long ago

 

It’s time to hold the Obama administration accountable for their misdeeds.

 

We know the media will try to whitewash the seriousness of this issue.  We need to get the truth out as soon as possible, so please make a contribution to our TV ad campaign that holds Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton accountable – CONTRIBUTE HERE.

 

Again, you can contribute any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed amount of $5,000.

 

You can also make a contribution online here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee
ATTN:  Benghazi Ad Campaign

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

_______________________________

The House should Investigate and Subpoena Obama Administration to the Hilt

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2014

_____________________________

New Benghazi Scandal Revelations

 

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Illicit Piranha Feeding over WaPo Stats on Tea Party Spending Habits


USS GOP - Tea Party vs GOP Establishment

John R. Houk

© June 11, 2014

 

I often post relevant emails from PACs that are also fund raising for a cause. I don’t necessarily support the fund raising but I always include that info to give the reader the choice to do so.

 

While in the course of looking for background info on one those emails from the Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) I ran into some information that I found disappointing about various Tea Party organizations. One of those organizations is one of my favorites as far as the Tea Party Movement goes which is the Tea Party Express (let’s abbreviate as TPX). The TPX has a few offshoot PACs of which I also have a close affinity for; such as Move America Forward and the CCC.

 

The disturbing information I discovered was the accusation that TPX leadership pocket substantial amounts of their donations for personal use and only utilize a small percentage for the actual Tea Party agenda. So I wrote a kind of a full disclosure paragraph prior to posting the CCC email entitled “Benghazi Bombshell: Allen West’s Stunning Report” on May 26, 2014. Here is that paragraph:

 

The Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) sent a donation request via email and in doing so talked about the subject of Benghazigate. Just a heads up about donations to this particular Tea Party connected PAC is that there appears to be a lineage questionable spending of those donations. Apparently this lineage of Tea Party organizations spend most of their donated money on salaries than they do on the causes they promote. Of course donation mismanagement accusations might be an attack job by the Republican Establishment elites growing weary of Tea Party organizations telling voters they can make a difference by not voting for RINOs and/or Republicans with a semi-Conservative agenda but refuse to change the air of political corruption plaguing Congress. A lot of fiefdoms would topple among Dems and the GOP Establishment that maintain the power structure of do-nothing to solve budget and debt crises in America (Perhaps there is a suggestion GOP elite response HERE and HERE.)

 

The first link (other than the CCC link) is to RightOnDaily.com. Before discussing that link here is a very brief description from their about page:

 

The Right On Daily Blog – is now a collaborative effort of several conservative activists in Placer County. As such, individual identities are not specified.

 

Please note that the primary purpose of RightOnDaily.com is about exposing fraud in the Republican Party and the agendas of government.

 

Posted – 2:47 am

Aaron F Park

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 

The Placer County spoken of on the about page has been a Republican Party stronghold for some time with a population of nearly 350,000 people that stretches from near Sacramento to its west to the Nevada border on its east. So for clarification’s sake it is true to say that RightOnDaily.com supports a Conservative agenda.

 

Aaron F. Park authored the post of the critical information of various Tea Party organizations of which the TPX lineage is also included. The post is entitled “Finally! National Exposure “Tea Party” PAC’s exposed for the frauds they are…” Park quotes a story that he only identifies as MSM so I am unsure of the actual source:

 

Three well-known groups — the Tea Party Patriots, the Tea Party Express and the Madison Project — have spent 5 percent or less of their money directly on election-related activity during this election cycle. Two other prominent tea party groups, the Senate Conservatives Fund and FreedomWorks, have devoted about 40 percent of their money to direct candidate support such as ads and yard signs.

 

On average, super PACs had spent 64 percent of their funds on directly helping candidates by roughly this stage in the 2012 election cycle, according to Federal Election Commission data.

 

I have a limited familiarity with the Tea Party Patriots and the Senate Fund so I will let them off the hook with my thoughts. The accusation that the TPX (and probably related affiliates) have only spent 5% of their donations on “election related activity” as compared to the 40% or the larger 64% is quite the accusation.

 

It took some random Googling to stumble upon the article that Aaron Park spoke of. I was not surprised the article was in the Washington Post written by Matea Gold. The article written by Ms. Gold is entitled “Tea party PACs reap money for midterms, but spend little on candidates”. Gold’s article is probably more fodder for Establishment Republicans than for Dems. If the Dems overtly and specifically criticize the fiscal management of Tea Party organizations, there is a good chance blow back on Dem campaign tactics like ballot stuffing of ineligible voters (e.g. Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and dead people etc.) and more nefarious practices by Community activist Dem or Leftist PACs. Leftist PACs campaign practices go way beyond pouring money into individual Dem candidates and would dwarf any significance to any fiscal mismanagement Gold accuses Tea Party organizations of. 

 

I found a Hot Air article which tries to be even handed but in my opinion leans toward Establishment favoritism managed a fair and balanced quote from Sal Russo of the Tea Party Express that places Gold’s statistics in a better perspective:

 

The Tea Party Express, a PAC run out of Sacramento by longtime Republican consultant Sal Russo, has paid Russo’s firm $2.75 million since the beginning of 2013, while donating just $45,000 to candidates and spending less than $162,000 on ads and bus tours supporting their election.

 

Russo said that figure was misleading because most of the payments to his firm were reimbursements for the cost of staffing the elaborate bus tours and rallies that the group holds around the country.

 

“Everything goes on our credit card,” he said. “Sometimes there’s up to 45 people that we’ve got to feed and house.”

 

Those activities, while not explicit political expenditures, give a bigger return than expensive television ads, Russo said. (WaPo: Tea Party PACs spend most of their cash on themselves; By Ed Morrissey; Hot Air; 4/28/14 2:01 PM) 

 

It sounds to me like Russo is saying TPX spends most of its money on grass roots organizing. HELLO! Building grass roots voters is what will build a strong voting bloc. Ultimately rallies and meetings spreading the Conservative message of fair taxes, less government, fiscal responsibility and constitutional Originalism. People that vote for a political party out of a family heritage, Union pressures or popularity due to name recognition are typically ignorant voters. Committed Leftists know what they are voting for and will mislead the young, the minorities and the elderly based on government hand-outs. This group of people may not realize they are voting for bigger taxes, bigger and more intrusive government, the delusion that a fetus is a part of a person’s body like an appendix and an immoral society. Tea Party voters know they are voting for Conservative principles. Now it may be true that many Tea Partiers may disagree on certain degrees of Social Conservatism yet it is my sense Social Liberal values is a minority while Social Conservative values is more the norm.

 

The grass roots nature of the Tea Party Movement is more than the solidifying the Conservative like-minded. Grass roots also means educating voters. A knowledgeable voter can make up their mind based on what they know rather than what they are told in America’s voting system. In this grass roots vein, a highly organized Tea Party organization like TPX and affiliates will benefit real Conservative candidates in the long run. This will irritate the odd GOP Establishment political spectrum of Left leaning RINOs through slanted Right Republicans that may talk a good Conservative game but vote to not rock the political boat.

 

It is these GOP Establishment types that utilize the journalism of WaPo’s journalist Matea Gold to slam various Tea Party organizations by warping statistics to imply personal pocketing of donations. Now I can see the comeback for my assertion might be something like, “So why do these Tea Party leaders pay themselves big salaries and pay their own private businesses for product and services rendered to their Tea Party PAC organization?”

 

Well let’s see. We live in America. America is a Capitalist entrepreneurial system. It may nepotistic for a politician to influence taxpayer money to their own business or to a business that benefits a family member, but PAC is private funding. There is nothing wrong with using your own business to provide goods and services for a non-taxpayer funded PAC. Dear god! If you can help with sourcing a political agenda you believe in more power to you. I mean billionaire George Soros has his money in so many PACs I’d have to Google a list to find them all. Old Soros has bought into the Leftist transformation of society whole sale steer voters to his way of thinking. Do you think Soros might own something that benefits from providing goods and services to one of the Leftist PAC organizations? It may be more difficult to discover because Soros is a billionaire that supports a society that will eliminate the wealthy that disagrees with a Left a wing utopian society. He makes the same kind of money he derides the wealthy for. So Soros uses shell companies that own shell companies that own companies which own another company. That makes it difficult to trace the power behind the money to a Left Wing PAC.

 

So what if a Tea Party leader is not trying to hide his personal involvement for what he believes in, right?

 

But then there are other Conservatives and Tea Party organizations that view doing business with yourself as a sign of corruption. In asking why I can only speculate. Conservatives like Aaron Park representing a Conservative organization like RightOnDaily.com might be displaying a legitimate even if misguiding suspicion. The term “misguided” is best description I can give of a legitimate Conservative criticizing another legitimate Conservative’s financial methods. Disagreement with the organizational management might be irritating, but I would hesitate to smear a fellow Conservative with nefarious financial practices. Business decisions don’t always work out for the person that may lose a profit to another business. I’m just speculating in Park’s case but perhaps he had a bad business transaction, watched a bad business transaction or heard of a bad business transaction by say someone like a TPX leadership person such as Sal Russo which may have rubbed Park the wrong way.

 

There may be the case of Tea Party organization rivalry as well since the Tea Party Movement is not monolithic. There are the large Tea Party organizations like TPX, but realize most Tea Party organizations are localized by State and even in some cases by County. Connectivity between Tea Party organizations is purely voluntary. If a large organization like TPX plans an event on another local Tea Party organization’s turf and there is disagreement or a lack of agenda coordination, sour grapes are bound to be the produce.

 

Personally I’d like to see the Tea Party Movement become a little more monolithic perhaps even as a political party to eliminate the Establishment portion of the GOP. But that is just me. I suspect a large number of Tea Parties have an affinity to the local independence of a Tea Party organization to push the Conservative agenda that is relevant to the locality. National issues often do not equate well with a local issue.

 

For an Op/Ed article to WaPo’s Gold article, a very good perspective defending how a Tea Party’s fiscal spending agenda can be found at the Tea Party News Network (TPNN) by Greg Campbell entitled “The Left Simply Doesn’t Get it: WaPo Slams Tea Party for Grassroots Commitment”. In that Op/Ed Campbell quotes a great thought from Sal Russo:

 

“All of the tea party Senate victories over the last two cycles have been candidates who had strong grassroots support, but were outspent by their establishment opponents.  The facts are there, but the Washington mentality refuses to see reality.  In 2010, when we didn’t have a presidential nominee to dominate the messaging, we won 10 straight Senate primaries for the underdog who was out-spent by the establishment.  So it obviously shows that good campaigns that are adequately finance with grassroots support can consistently beat big-spending establishment candidates.

 

They obviously ignore the fact that most of our activity is not allocable to specific candidates under the FEC laws and regulations.  When we do rallies and encourage people who either attend, see us on the internet or in the media to get engaged in the political process, it has a profound effect on the election, but it is not reportable as a direct expenditure.  If they are right that engaging people in the political process is irrelevant, why does the establishment spend millions of dollars to defeat tea party candidates?”

 

Ryan Gill of TPX affiliate CCC wrote an email pertaining to that short paragraph I had written on May 26 that informed readers to be cognizant before donating to CCC. That email was a reassurance that there was no hanky-panky going on at CCC. Ryan didn’t go into specifics about those reassurances. I discovered those reassurances in studying for this post. I had asked for permission to post Mr. Gill’s email. Mr. Gill responded to my permission request with this email sent on June 1:

 

I was a little non-specific in my email to you just because I just wanted to reassure you and let you know I can answer questions. But sure, you’re welcome to post it and I’d be happy to see your readers reassured as well. Thanks.

 

Being typically behind in reading my emails I did not get to Mr. Gill’s permission email until June 10. So I decided to investigate the opposite of “non-specific” before I posted Mr. Gill’s original reassurance.

 

I am reassured.

 

Below is the reassurance email. I originally intended to lead off with, but I thought it better to write what I discovered first.

 

JRH 6/11/14

Please Support NCCR

******************************

Re: CCC and spending

 

By Ryan Gill

Website: Conservative Campaign Committee

Sent: June 1, 2014 3:58 PM

Original Response Date: May 27, 2014 at 7:19 PM

Sharing by Permission

 

Just saw your post with lengthy disclaimer about CCC and wanted to reassure you that we really value the contributions people make and we’re proud of how we’re able to use those funds to be effective on behalf of the conservative movement.

 

Of course there’s a lot of confusing and sometimes misleading information out there and it’s often convenient for liberal reporters or others not to dig deeper and actually find out what’s going on. So I appreciate that you want to do your due diligence and you want readers to be apprised. So it’s a constant battle for us explaining what we do, how and why…and often to people who have already decided that they just don’t like us or what we do.

 

So I just wanted to reassure you about our organization and efforts and make sure you know that I’m available to answer questions (though I may be slow at times) if there’s something you don’t understand.

 

And of course: thanks so much for sharing our email and for all the good work you do! We’re glad you’re out there.

________________________________

I feel good about donating to CCC as a Tea Party Movement cause. Here is their donation page if you are in a position as a giver.

 

 

Benghazi Bombshell: Allen West’s Stunning Report


Obama's Terrorism Failures banner

The Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) sent a donation request via email and in doing so talked about the subject of Benghazigate. Just a heads up about donations to this particular Tea Party connected PAC is that there appears to be a lineage questionable spending of those donations. Apparently this lineage of Tea Party organizations spend most of their donated money on salaries than they do on the causes they promote. Of course donation mismanagement accusations might be an attack job by the Republican Establishment elites growing weary of Tea Party organizations telling voters they can make a difference by not voting for RINOs and/or Republicans with a semi-Conservative agenda but refuse to change the air of political corruption plaguing Congress. A lot of fiefdoms would topple among Dems and the GOP Establishment that maintain the power structure of do-nothing to solve budget and debt crises in America (Perhaps there is a suggestion GOP elite response HERE and HERE.)

 

At any rate whatever you think of the massive CCC (and affiliates) spending of donations, the CCC email pertaining to Benghazigate is informative and should inspire voters to mobilize against the lies of Obama Administration not only against the Benghazigate cover-up but also the multiple obfuscating cover-ups plaguing Obama at this present time. So I am cross posting this email below more for information awareness than for CCC promotion. It is information being provided by CCC that should inspire the grassroots rank and file of the Tea Party movement to become at least a letter writing activist. Shoot! Even if certain Tea Party organizations are mismanaging their donations, the massive public rallies they organize should by supported on an activist level – SHOW-UP to those rallies in person at the very least. Feet on the ground is the next best thing to voting that gets the attention of politicians on the Left and the Right alike.

 

JRH 5/26/14

Please Support NCCR

********************************

Benghazi Bombshell:  Allen West’s Stunning Report

 

By Conservative Campaign Committee

Sent: 5/26/2014 9:56 AM

Sent by CCC PAC

 

Obama’s Terrorism Failures

 

The Washington Times [Blog Editor: Title and link to Washington Times story – “Allen West: Source told me ‘truth’ on Benghazi; operations ‘shrouded in a fog of lies’”] has an explosive report from former Congressman Allen West on what really happened in Benghazi – and how Barack Obama’s administration has engaged in a massive effort to deceive the American people:

 

Wash. Times Excerpt - 5-24-14

 

Please, do not let those four Americans who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 be forgotten, swept under the rug by Democrat politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama who don’t want the American people to know about the lies and cover ups surrounding that horrific terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Please review our TV ad below demanding that Barack Obama be held accountable for the Benghazi cover up, and if you want us to keep the pressure on the Obama administration for this scandal, make a contribution to our TV ad campaign – HERE.

 

VIDEO: TV Ad: Hold Obama Accountable for Benghazi Scandal

 

You can help us keep these ads running on the airwaves by making a contribution of any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000. 

To make a contribution online – JUST CLICK HERE.

Ever since the Benghazi terrorist attack the Obama administration, with significant backing from the liberal media, have attempted to hide the truth about what happened.  To cover their failures in combating terrorism, they told lies saying it was not a preplanned terrorist attack, even when they knew that to be an absolute falsehood.

 

Rice Lying to Public banner

 

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and countless members of the Obama administration have lied, concealed and attempted to cover up not only the truth but their failures.  As has been his pattern of appeasement in the face of Islamic terrorism, Obama himself would not even call this an act of terrorism.

 

USA Today by-line banner

 

Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said it didn’t matter whether Benghazi was a terrorist attack or whether she and the Obama administration had lied about it.

 

What Difference does it make banner

 

The Obama administration has dishonored those who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 and now they say it doesn’t matter because it happened “a long time ago.”

 

Carner 'a long time ago' banner

 

It’s time to hold the Obama administration accountable for their misdeeds.

We know the media will try to whitewash the seriousness of this issue.  We need to get the truth out as soon as possible, so please make a contribution to our TV ad campaign that holds Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton accountable – CONTRIBUTE HERE.

 

Again, you can contribute any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed amount of $5,000.

 

You can also make a contribution online here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee
ATTN:  Benghazi Ad Campaign

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

________________________________

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Palin Endorses Pierson for Texas District 32


Katrina Pierson endorsed by Sarah Palin

John R. Houk

© February 25, 2014

 

I am a supporter of Sarah Palin. Because of my support my interest is always piqued when she endorses someone. I wish Palin would run for public office but as time slips on by that is becoming more and more unlikely. With the beginning of endorsements for the 2014 election cycle it increases my reasoning that Palin will announce any kind of candidacy for the time being.

 

It has come to my attention Sarah Palin has endorsed Katrina Pierson Republican Tea Party candidate to run against in the tank for Obamacare and the Obama agenda incumbent Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas 32nd District for the House of Representatives.

 

The Lame Stream Media and the Republican Establishment must be worried because are in character assassination mode toward Tea Party activist Pierson. An article in the Texas Observer relating a Slate article that brought out some data showing Pierson was receiving unemployment funds while she was consulting for Senator Ted Cruz’s campaign.

 

The picture painted is that Katrina Pierson must be a Tea Party hypocrite for taking government money for being (what?) unemployed. Now who has been in our nation’s Executive Office for nearly 6 years with little to no improvement in the U.S. economy or unemployment stats for better or worse depending on the scrubbed numbers provided by the White House?

 

The picture also painted is Pierson may have done something illegal while receiving unemployment benefits while consulting for Senator Ted Cruz. Since the Texas Observer article does not mention if Pierson received compensation from the Cruz campaign I am guessing there was nothing illegal there. Even if there was consulting beneficiary for Pierson I suspect it would have to substantial enough to be considered employment rather than doing odd jobs while waiting for a job compensatory to her former employment. After the article talked about her activism as a Tea Party advocate and being a spokesperson against U.N. Agenda 21 as if that is a crazy nut thing to do as Leftists would have you believe. Since only crazy people would be against the U.N. stepping on U.S. sovereignty telling Americans and making rules for Americans to manage their own land whether for agriculture or some kind of natural resource usage.

 

It’s hard not to think that more than a few of Pierson’s fellow conservatives might be bothered by the prospect that their tax dollars were subsidizing her full-time activism—they would certainly be furious if a Battleground Texas organizer did the same. I wouldn’t argue that the jobless should cease their political activity, but Pierson’s supporters might. Sessions, for his part, called a potential federal extension of unemployment benefits “immoral” just last week.

 

Pierson’s primary challenge to Sessions has been pretty much the only credible tea party primary challenge to an incumbent representative this cycle, so her failure to launch has really been something. Pierson has seemed to flounder, despite her ties to Ted Cruz’s 2012 campaign (and the endorsement of both Cruz’s father, Rafael, and Sarah Palin,) and her high profile in the activist community. She hasn’t been able to draw on the resources that might help make her candidacy viable—Sessions had accumulated over 20 times Pierson’s campaign cash at the end of January.

 

Sessions is conservative, make no mistake about it. But in his nearly two decades in Washington, he’s accumulated a thick layer of grime. He was an associate of both Jack Abramoff and Allen Stanford. In a comic example of congressional excess, Sessions once earmarked $1.6 million dollars for “dirigible research” by an Illinois company that employed a former aide as a lobbyist. (The company had no previous experience with dirigibles.) (The Katrina Pierson Bubble Bursts; By Christopher Hooks; Texas Observer; 2/24/14 at 9:35 CST)

 

In one breath the article author Hooks tells us to “make no mistake” that Sessions is a Conservative but has had money scandals with Jack Abramoff, Allen Stanford and sending $1.6 million bucks to an Illinois dirigible company that employed a former Sessions aid. Hooks also fails to mention that Sessions’ Conservative bona fides is questionable with the Congressman’s support of Obamacare. Pete Sessions is only Conservative enough to try to look good to his 32nd District voters. When it comes to the issues that it is time to put his so-called Conservative foot down Sessions tows the Republican Establishment line.

 

I am looking at Katrina Pierson’s candidacy because of a Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) email promoting her with publicizing Sarah Palin’s endorsement. I am cross posting the email below because it has quoted Palin on the endorsement. You should know that this email was sent on 2/23/14. I am telling you this because there is a time sensitive request for funding a pro-Pierson TV ad that provides a deadline for the 24th. Of course that deadline has passed as of this post but I am sure the CCC would still accept targeted donations for Katrina Pierson. I probably should ad that the CCC is a Tea Party organization that probably is not directly affiliated with the Pierson campaign.

 

JRH 2/25/14

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

FANTASTIC:  Sarah Palin Makes Powerful Endorsement

 

Sent by Conservative Campaign Committee

Sent: 2/23/2014 7:48 PM

 

There was big news for conservatives this week:  Governor Sarah Palin made her 1st endorsement of the 2014 election cycle, and she chose to endorse Conservative Republican Katrina Pierson for Congress!

 

Here’s what Gov. Palin had to say in her endorsement of Pierson:

 

“Katrina Pierson is an emerging leader and important voice for the future of the grassroots conservative movement.  Her life’s story is full of hardship she has fought to overcome, which taught her firsthand the importance of self-reliance, hard work, and the blessings of liberty.

 

A feisty fighter for freedom, Katrina is taking on a powerful incumbent who has so lost touch with the people of his district that he’s not even bothering to spend much time in Texas anymore. It’s not only his district he’s lost touch with, but also the issues important to the voters there. He used his powerful position to oppose the movement to defund Obamacare, has voted to raise the debt ceiling, and has been an advocate for the NSA intrusion into our freedoms.

 

When asked about Katrina’s primary challenge, he said, “these things happen.” Yes, they do. We all know what happens when we come together to support a good candidate like Katrina – the permanent political class loses and We the People win! We win by electing a fighter we can depend on like Katrina Pierson.

 

Ted Cruz calls Katrina “an utterly fearless principled conservative.” He should know. Katrina was among the conservative grassroots warriors in Texas who worked tirelessly to elect Senator Cruz.”

 

The election takes place less than 2 weeks from now, so time is of the essence. 

We are now preparing our first TV ad buy in support of Katrina Pierson, and we must raise $7,315 by tomorrow in order to pay for this ad buy.  You can help us reach this goal by making a contribution – HERE.

 

We need 67 people to contribute $100 or more by tomorrow morning if we are going to reach our goal.  To contribute $100 or more online – CLICK HERE.

 

Katrina Pierson served on the steering committee of the Dallas Tea Party for 5 years, is founder of the Garland Tea Party, and was a member of the Tea Party Caucus Advisory Committee.  She has been fighting in the trenches for conservative causes for years!

 

What is perhaps most inspiring about Katrina Pierson’s life story is the passion and determination she has shown in making her life a success story.  You see, Katrina grew up on welfare to a teenage mother.  Instead of falling into a life of government-dependency, Katrina was determined to make something of her life and applied hard work and determination to pursue the American Dream.

 

Pierson has been an advocate for conservative policies and challenged the establishment of both the Republican and Democrat parties.  You’ve no doubt seen her on Fox News Channel fighting for the conservative movement.  Here is a screen grab of her during one such appearance on Fox News with Neil Cavuto:

 

Cavuto-Pierson Fox News Screen Capture

Cavuto-Pierson Fox News Screen Capture

 

That’s why Katrina Pierson has been endorsed by Governor Sarah Palin, the Tea Party Express, FreedomWorks, the Conservative Campaign Committee, the Republican Liberty Caucus, the American Gun Rights organization, the conservative SHE-PAC organization (sic), Michelle Malkin, Rafael Cruz (Ted Cruz’s father), Joe The Plumber and conservatives across the nation.

 

Ted Cruz has heaped praise on Pierson, calling her:  “An utterly fearless principled conservative” and Cruz praised Pierson with good reason.  You see, Katrina Pierson was one of the leading campaigners for Ted Cruz, helping him to get elected to the U.S. Senate:

 

Katrina Pierson Campaigned for Ted Cruz photo

Katrina Pierson Campained for Ted Cruz

 

It’s not just that Katrina Pierson is so great, but her opponent – incumbent Congressman Pete Sessions – needs to be ousted from Congress.   Sessions bad-mouthed the effort to defund and repeal ObamaCare, with Sessions saying “we do not want to stop it.”

 

But guess what Pete Sessions has stopped?  He’s blocked the Select Committee to investigate the Benghazi terrorist scandal including the lies and deceptions being promulgated by the Obama administration.

 

This key Midterm Election takes place March 4th – less than one month away, so we must get to work right now to win this campaign for Conservative Republican Katrina Pierson.

 

You can support our independent expenditure campaign supporting Katrina Pierson by making a contribution online – HERE.

 

You can contribute as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000.  To kick off our campaign we need 200 people to make a contribution of $100 or more within the next 24 hours.  If you can afford to make a contribution of $100 or more – PLEASE CLICK HERE.

 

You can also mail in a contribution to our headquarters here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee

ATTN: Katrina Pierson for Congress

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

_____________________________________

Palin Endorses Pierson for Texas District 32

John R. Houk

© February 25, 2014

___________________________________

FANTASTIC:  Sarah Palin Makes Powerful Endorsement

 

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

 

About CCC

 

Conservative Campaign Committee is a traditional Political Action Committee that works with grassroots conservatives across the country to make our movement more effective, hold Barack Obama and the liberals in Washington accountable and support important campaigns and outstanding conservative candidates for federal office. Before 2013, we were known as The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

 

We’ve assembled a team of dedicated, principled and seasoned conservative activists who bring a wide variety of talents to our innovative projects and strategic campaigns.

 

LLOYD MARCUS, CHAIRMAN

 

Lloyd Marcus is a (black) Unhyphenated American and an internationally renowned conservative columnist, singer/songwriter and author. While Lloyd’s feel-good music spans smooth jazz, pop and adult contemporary, his original political songs and commentaries have earned him worldwide notoriety. Lloyd is a prominent voice of the American Tea Party Movement and the singer/songwriter of the “American Tea Party Anthem”. Marcus has traveled with the Tea Party Express and been seen on FoxNews, CNN, PJTV and READ THE REST

 

Looks like a Palin Senate Race to me


Sarah Palin v Mark Begich

John R. Houk

© July 13, 2013

 

I’m not really big on donating for political campaigns when there are no announced Conservative candidates to oppose a liberal incumbent. The Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) has sprouted up to support Conservative candidates nationwide and rightfully so. I believe the CCC is an offshoot of the Tea Party Express which is an organization I follow so often I probably should join. In the 2012 election cycle the CCC went by Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama. If you Google that you will be directed to the CCC website.

 

Anyway the CCC sent a donation teaser recently that showed a war of words between Sarah Palin and Democrat Alaskan Senator Mark Begich. Begich must defend his incumbency in the 2014 election cycle.

 

There is a draft Sarah Palin for Senate move going around the nation. And now I read on Yahoo News that Sarah Palin is moving toward the idea of running for the Senate in Alaska.

 

And so the CCC donation tease is significant for those of us who believe that Sarah Palin is needed in leadership in the United States of America.

 

JRH 7/13/13

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

Sarah Palin got it right!

 

Sent by Tina Ward

Sent: 7/11/2013 7:21 PM

Sent from: Conservative Campaign Committee

 

Defeat Mark Begich banner

 

ABC News has news headlines today about the war of words that has developed between Gov. Sarah Palin and Democrat Alaska Senator, Mark Begich.

 

And Sarah Palin’s comments couldn’t be more on the mark.  Here’s what she said today about Begich’s awful record as a failed liberal – harming this nation as he continuously sides with Barack Obama:

 

“Mark, after looking at your voting record I can see why you are looking for a distraction. You have voted FOR Obamacare, FOR massive tax increases, FOR carbon taxes which could cost Alaskans 21,000 jobs, AGAINST pro-life legislation, and there’s so much more. You even flip-flopped to oppose the nation’s balanced budget amendment.

 

“You agree with, and vote with, ultra-liberal Senators Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid approximately 90% of the time. Mark, you recently said, “Alaskans pick who they want based on what’s good for Alaska.” Couldn’t agree more, Mark, which is why many hope to see great changes for our great state following the upcoming 2014 election.”

 

Democrat Mark Begich must be defeated – he voted for Obama’s stimulus.  He voted for ObamaCare.  He has announced that he favors further expansion of ObamaCare.  That’s why we’ve launched an Independent Expenditure campaign to “Defeat Mark Begich,” and we need your help!

 

Winning this seat is critical to our efforts to electing a conservative majority in the U.S. Senate and ousting Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader.  We know that Reid and the Democrats will spend whatever they can to make sure we are not successful.  So we need everyone’s support for our campaign to “Defeat Mark Begich.”

 

You can make a contribution online – HERE.

 

You can also mail in a contribution to our headquarters here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee

ATTN: Defeat Mark Begich

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

 

Thank you for your continued support of conservative candidates and our efforts to oust Harry Reid and his Democrat majority from the Senate in the upcoming Midterm Elections.

___________________________

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Al Franken an IRS Obamunista


Defeat Al Franken Banner

 

John R. Houk

© May 21, 2013

 

Former comedian turned Fringe Leftist Senator – Al Franken – unsurprisingly is becoming implicated in the IRS Scandal to target Conservative Tea Partiers to silence any opposition to his reelection bid in 2014. Apparently the Obama Administration has made a bid to maintain political power by using the Internal Revenue Service to target Conservatives – especially Tea Party people – to villainize them and to stop the real truth to expose Democrat deceit and Obama illicit deception.

 

The Conservative Campaign Committee (which I believe is a part of the Tea Party Express) is targeting Senator Al Franken (an Obamunista) reelection campaign. In a fund raising email CCC utilizes Franken’s involvement with the IRS Scandal to collect a political war chest to help the (probable) best Tea Party Conservative to defeat Franken.

 

(The Subsidiarity Times) Giving his take on the recently exposed IRS Scandal where the IRS targeted right-leaning non-profit groups for harsher treatment then left-leaning non-profit groups, talk show host Jason Lewis stated that he believed the recent revelation that seven Democratic senators, Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Al Franken (D-MN), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Tom Udall (D-NM), had written the IRS in 2012 and demanded that the agency go after right-leaning non-profit groups, now implicated the whole Democratic Party in this scandal.

 

“When you really talk about connecting the dots, this is no longer a presidential scandal, this is a Democratic scandal” said Lewis.

 

Lewis started off his talking point by explaining the scandal’s original basic details and then pointed out that shortly after the seven Democratic senators sent the letter, the IRS targeted around five hundred groups associated with right-leaning terms such as Tea Party, Constitution and Patriot for additional scrutiny and harassment for details about their organizations.

 

“It effectively neutralized (these right-leaning groups), at least in 2012, and maybe in 2010, maybe going back a decade, we don’t know! Nobody knows, because nobody’s talking!” said Lewis. (Bold Emphasis Mine – READ the REST; Jason Lewis: IRS Scandal now an explicitly Democratic Party scandal; By Professor Wall; The Subsidiarity Times; 5/17/13)

 

Here is the CCC email writing of Al Franken’s involvement in the IRS Scandal and their request for funding to aid in Franken’s election defeat.

 

JRH 5/21/13

Please Support NCCR

**********************************

DRUDGE REPORT: Al Franken urged IRS to target Tea Party

 

By Lloyd Marcus

Sent: 5/17/2013 7:46 PM

Sent by Conservative Campaign Committee

 

Today the Drudge Report published a Daily Caller news story which implicates liberal Democrat Senator Al Franken in the growing IRS scandal.  In 2012, as part of an effort to use the IRS to intimidate and silence conservative groups, Al Franken called on the IRS to target the tea party.

 

Drudge Headline

clip_image002

 

Franken co-authored a letter to the IRS along with a handful of other Democrat Senators demanding that the IRS target tea party groups applying for 501c4 non-profit status.  Then Franken spoke out at a press conference on March 21, 2012 where he told the media:

 

“I think that there hasn’t been enforcement by the FEC and the IRS… That’s pretty hinky.  I mean, they really aren’t doing that, and that I think there needs to be a look at that…”

 

Al Franken got his wish and the IRS targeted, investigated, harrassed (sic) and intimidated tea party organizations and other conservative groups.

 

Now it’s time to hold Al Franken accountable for his shameful actions of trying to use the IRS to conservative voices in this country.  It’s time we defeated Al Franken and ousted him from the U.S. Senate once and for all.  Please support our campaign to “Defeat Al Franken” and help us replace him with a constitutional conservative who will serve the people of this great nation, and not be a puppet for Barack Obama and his minions.

 

You can support our “Defeat Al Franken” campaign with a contribution of any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000.  To support our efforts, please make an online contribution – HERE.

 

Barack Obama is heavily invested in Al Franken’s re-election for reasons that should be obvious by now, and we need your help to boot Barack Obama’s good pal out of the U.S. Senate.

 

Franken-Obama Yucking it up

clip_image004

 

Let’s deprive Barack Obama of one of his most loyal votes in the U.S. Senate.  Support our campaign to “Defeat Al Franken” – CONTRIBUTE HERE.

 

Friends, we MUST defeat Al Franken in the upcoming midterm elections.

 

With Franken already amassing a warchest of over $2 million and launching his Senate re-election campaign, we here at the Conservative Campaign Committee are launching our TV and radio ad campaigns to “Defeat Al Franken” and we need your support.

 

You can also mail in a contribution to our headquarters here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee

ATTN: Campaign to Defeat Al Franken

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

_______________________

Al Franken an IRS Obamunista

John R. Houk

© May 21, 2013

_______________________

DRUDGE REPORT: Al Franken urged IRS to target Tea Party

 

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.