Even Muslim Kids are Rape Jihadists


progressive-guide-rape-jihad-toon

John R. Houk

© November 23, 2016

 

Last Summer a five-year-old Idaho girl was raped by three migrant Muslim boys in their apartment laundry room. The boys were 7, 10, and 13 in age. The Leftist Prosecutor and activist Leftist Judge in Idaho refused to move forward with charges due to political correctness.

 

fawnbrook-apts-left-grant-loeb-right-leftist-prosecuter

Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls Idaho (left), where the 5-year-old girl was raped in the laundry room by 3 Muslim migrant boys; Grant Loeb (right) the liberal prosecutor who cares more about political correctness than justice.Mad World News photo

 

Here is some news dated yesterday excerpted from Mad World News:

 

After a five-year-old Twin Falls, Idaho girl was brutally raped over the summer by three Muslim migrant boys, aged 7, 10, and 13, the mainstream media repeatedly told Americans that a gang-rape committed by refugee children did not occur. However, new details are emerging as the case goes to court that will make your skin crawl, and what authorities are doing to the victim now is just as bad as what the boys did.

 

Most of us remember hearing about the rape that allegedly happened in Twin Falls, Idaho at an apartment complex, where three Muslim migrant boys held and sexually assaulted a five-year-old girl. However, what some might not remember are the conflicting stories from the liberal media that painted the news shared by alternative conservative outlets as false.

 

After the mainstream media and even Snopes “debunked” the facts, stating no knife and no gang-rape occurred, the truth was revealed in a hearing on Thursday. The 5-year-old victim was held at knifepoint as the 13-year-old migrant boy videoed the 7 and 10-year-old boys orally and anally rape her in the apartment complex laundry room.

 

According to Breitbart, the little girl’s mother said, “This is what my daughter has told me: that they grabbed her at knifepoint and forced her into the laundry room and told her that if she tried to leave, they would kill her. The seven-year-old boy took her clothes off. She tells me he put his private in her mouth and peed in her mouth, and put it in her private, and then peed all over her.”

 

Sobbing, the mother continued, “And she said they recorded her, too… She also told the emergency room CARES doctor that they had a knife as well, and they found on her neck a cut. Then the day after, they claimed it was a scratch, when in fact, it looked like a cut.”

 

Unfortunately, the liberal judge and prosecutor refuse to give the victim justice. Shockingly, these far-leftist scumbags in our criminal justice system don’t care about the little American girl as they rape her all over again in the courts in the name of political correctness, all so they don’t offend Muslims.

 

All of these boys are free. The judge didn’t send them to a youth detention center, where they belong, or deport them and their families. The now-14-year-old is even seen all over the Twin Falls community, but it gets worse. The little READ THE REST (Shocking New Details Emerge In Muslim Migrant Rape Of 5-Year-Old Idaho Girl; By Rebecca Diserio; Mad World News; 11/22/16)

 

This is the kind of horse-manure America’s Left desires to cover-up and worse, bring more hatethe Jews, Christian and American non-Muslims – Muslim migrants, refugees, or immigrants into the USA unvetted to know if their religious faith brings hatred or the concept of assimilation as in Out of Many, One (aka E Pluribus Unum).

rape-jihad-town-next-to-you

JRH 11/23/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

State officials mistreat girl, 5, raped by Muslim migrants
Exclusive: Pamela Geller says Idaho family ‘has suffered almost every kind of injustice’

By PAMELA GELLER

November 20, 2016

WND

 

Last summer, a 5-year-old girl was orally, anally and vaginally raped and urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys in Twin Falls, Idaho. Since then, instead of getting justice, the victim’s family has been abused by law enforcement and governing authorities as if they were the criminals – because what happened to their little girl contradicts the politically correct narrative about Muslim migrants.

 

And it just keeps getting worse. The victim’s mother has now informed me that, despite the huge medical expenses for their daughter that this attack has necessitated, the state of Idaho has told her the maximum assistance that her family can get is $4,500.

 

Make sure you’re never raped in the state of Idaho: If you’re 5 years old and your attackers are from a politically protected class, you’re only worth $4,500.

 

There seems to be no willingness on the part of the state or the county to reimburse this long-suffering family for any of the other costs that they have incurred because of the crime. Because they felt threatened – with very good reason – in continuing to live next door to one of the attackers’ families, they have been living in a succession of hotels; they have spent in excess of $2,000 in hotels alone.

 

Why did they have to relocate? Because Muslims were stopping in front of their home at night and shooting bottle rockets at it at 11:30 p.m. Apparently that kind of menacing and harassment doesn’t qualify as demonstrating a need for relocation.

 

The family also incurred babysitting fees, as well as expenses for transportation to get themselves to and from court. Then there is the astronomical cost of their lawyer, and other costs that he will require to accomplish anything positive for them.

 

This poor family has suffered almost every kind of injustice, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

 

Get Pamela Geller’s book, “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America.”

 

It is outrageous. And it gets even worse. For the longest time, the attacker wasn’t even limited in his access to the community’s children; now he must be supervised by someone 14 years old or older. When they stipulated this, the court had to have been aware that there was a boy who videotaped the rape who was also 14. This is a gross insult against this victimized family – and a direct result of a judge’s decision.
Meanwhile, the neighbor of the family who caught the perpetrators in the act, an elderly woman known to all as “Grandma Jo,” has been living in constant terror since she first happened upon the grisly scene. She has been stalked by the Iraqi family of the 7-year-old attacker. Her apartment is back-to-back with theirs; they peer into her windows and pace back and forth in front of her apartment in a clearly menacing manner.

 

The prosecuting attorney, Grant Loebs, has gone out of his way to imply that this rape was false information. His interviews have led the media and public officials to deny clear facts of the case. The U.S. attorney for Idaho even vowed to charge anyone who made false statements about the perps. The Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations has whined that the case has become “a lightning rod for anti-Muslim, and anti-refugee sentiments.”

 

Meanwhile, the victim in Twin Falls, once a happy and social child, now frequently insists that she wants to be alone. She finds a small and safe space inside a closet and stays in it alone for hours. Once a very chatty and happy child, she has become very quiet. Even during the summer heat of Twin Falls, she always wore two T-shirts and two pairs of underwear. She talked constantly about “those naughty boys” and asked her mother repeatedly not to tell her father everything that happened because it will upset him.

 

The alleged attackers’ families had no trouble getting new homes, but the victim’s family is still without a new apartment. Now that the media firestorm has subsided, the family is simply being ignored.

 

This little girl deserves justice. And she is not getting it. We are not going to forget about this case. The authorities who have failed this family and betrayed it for political correctness need to be repudiated, rejected, rebuked and removed from office. Enough is enough.

 

Note: A GoFundMe page has been established to fund medical, legal and housing costs for the victim and her family

___________________

Even Muslim Kids are Rape Jihadists

John R. Houk

© November 23, 2016

_________________

State officials mistreat girl, 5, raped by Muslim migrants

Pamela Geller is president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America” and “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.” Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

 

About WND

 

Since 1997, WND has been the world’s best-kept secret in Christian content and marketing. But the word is getting out.

 

There’s a reason WND.com has the largest reach of any Christian website on planet Earth.

 

 

WND can best be explained by its mission statement:

 

WND is an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising journalism, seeking truth and justice and revitalizing the role of the free press as a guardian of liberty. We remain faithful to the traditional and central role of a free press in a free society — as a light exposing wrongdoing, corruption and abuse of power. We also seek to stimulate a free-and-open debate about the great moral and political ideas facing the world and to promote freedom and self-government by encouraging personal virtue and good character.

 

READ ENTIRETY

 

“Free pass for terrorists” as US court cancels $654 million verdict against PLO


Dry Bones- BHO-Americn Lives Don't Matter

A U.S, Appellate Court says American victims of PLO/PA Islamic terrorism cannot sue because they have no standing. What in the devil is wrong with these judicial idiots?

 

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan has overturned a landmark $655 million verdict made in February 2016 against the Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization, in favor of victims of terror and their loved ones.

 

The federal appeals court reversed the decision this Wednesday (August 31, 2016), finding that United States courts had no jurisdiction in the case in the first place due to the limited contacts of the PA/PLO groups with the U.S. and Supreme Court. READ THE REST (US 2nd Circuit Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Terror Verdict Against Palestinian Authority, PLO; By Hana Levi Julian; JewishPress.com; 8/31/16)

 

America’s Leftist activist judges strike again by not holding PLO terrorists accountable for American deaths. A Federal Court originally made the civil award and 2nd Appellate denies the award. Crazy Injustices!

 

Here’s the expanded story from Jihad Watch.

 

JRH 9/3/16 (Hat Tip: Bob Gschwind on Crusaders G+ Community)

Please Support NCCR

***********************

“Free pass for terrorists” as US court cancels $654 million verdict against PLO

 

By Robert Spencer

September 1, 2016 12:29 pm

Judicial Watch

 

“The United States government had said last year that the case threatened to financially destabilize the Palestinian government and harm the region.” Oh my, we can’t have a “destabilized” “Palestinian” government. It might start lobbing rockets at Israeli civilians and calling for genocide on its TV channel!

 

“‘Free Pass for Terrorists’ as US Court Cancels $654 Million Verdict Against PLO,” Associated Press, September 1, 2016:

 

The decision to cancel the verdict against the PLO provides “a free pass for terrorists” to kill Americans overseas, said an attorney for families of victims.

 

A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday tossed out a $654 million jury verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization for terrorist attacks in the early 2000s in Israel that killed or wounded Americans, saying the U.S. courts lack jurisdiction because the attacks were random and not aimed at the United States.

 

The United States government had said last year that the case threatened to financially destabilize the Palestinian government and harm the region.

 

Wednesday’s written decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said the attacks in 2002 and 2004 that killed 33 people and wounded hundreds more were “unquestionably horrific.” But the three-judge panel said they were fortuitous and “not expressly aimed at the United States.”

 

The decision, written by U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl, who was sitting on the court temporarily, said offices maintained by the PLO and Palestinian Authority in Washington were used to promote the Palestinian cause in speeches and media appearances and to retain a lobbying firm. It said those purposes were insufficient to give U.S. courts jurisdiction over the groups for random attacks abroad.

 

“It’s a very surprising ruling,” said Robert Tolchin, an attorney for families of Americans killed or injured in the attacks.

He said the decision provides “a free pass for terrorists” to kill Americans overseas. Lawyers, he added, were considering appeals options.

 

Gassan A. Baloul, an attorney for the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, said: “We are very gratified that the court fully accepted our clients’ consistent position that the PA and the PLO are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States courts in these matters.”

 

The ruling pertained to a February 2015 jury award of $218 million to Americans in a case that relied on the Anti-Terrorism Act, which allows victims of U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations to seek compensation for pain and suffering, loss of earnings and other hardship. The award was automatically tripled under the law….

 

___________________

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer. in the United States and/or other countries – Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

 

Content copyright Jihad Watch

 

Why Jihad Watch?

 

Why Jihad Watch? Because non-Muslims in the West, as well as in India, China, Russia, and the world over, are facing a concerted effort by Islamic jihadists, the motives and goals of whom are largely ignored by the Western media, to destroy their societies and impose Islamic law upon them — and to commit violence to that end even while their overall goal remains out of reach. That effort goes under the general rubric of jihad.

 

Jihad (Arabic for “struggle”) is a central duty of every Muslim. Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history and a central element of Islamic theology. Many passages of the Qur’an and sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad are used by jihad warriors today to justify their actions and gain new recruits. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, which denies unbelievers equality of human rights and dignity, is available today for anyone with the will and means to bring it to life.

 

In Islamic history and doctrine violent jihad is founded on numerous verses of the Qur’an — most notably, one known in Islamic theology as the “Verse of the Sword”: “Then, when READ THE REST

 

 About Robert Spencer

 

ROBERT SPENCER is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of fifteen books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery). His latest book is The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran (Regnery).

 

Spencer has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the FBI, the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army’s Asymmetric Warfare Group, the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), and the U.S. intelligence community. He has discussed jihad, Islam, and terrorism at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. State Department and the German Foreign Ministry. He is a consultant with the Center for Security Policy and vice president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, and has also served as a contributing writer to Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism and as an Adjunct Fellow with the Free Congress Foundation.

 

Spencer is a weekly columnist for PJ Media and FrontPage Magazine, and has written many hundreds of articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism. His articles on Islam and other topics have appeared in READ THE REST