Tony Newbill Observations on Comey/Clinton


Hillary-Lynch-Comey-BHO White House Corruption

Tony Newbill (pseudonym) has some interesting insight on FBI Director Comey’s announcement that his FBI Office IS NOT recommending an indictment against Crooked Hillary Clinton. The insight came as two comments made to the NCCR cross post of “Analysis of FBI Directors Hearing with Congress”.

 

Newbill sees a leftist ruling class held to a different standard of laws than the regular Joe American thus this ruling class is fracturing American society inculcating distrust as a norm in society. Ergo this distrust leads to divisiveness in society.

 

JRH 7/10/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Tony Newbill Observations on Comey/Clinton

Posted from NCCR Comment Section: 7/10/16

 

n3angus [aka Tony Newbill]

July 8, 2016 at 10:58 AM

 

Man what a Mess this country is getting in, and it could be said it stems from corruption within the Judicial system where it looks like there are 2 sets of laws that the ruling class use for themselves and then the civilian laws, like this reads: http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/comey-has-long-history-of-clinton-related-cases/!

 

FBI Director James Comey

FBI Director James Comey

 

NEW YORK – FBI Director James Comey has a long history of involvement in Department of Justice actions that arguably ended up favorable to the Clintons.

 

In 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration officials who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack.

 

On Tuesday, Comey announced that despite evidence of “extreme negligence by Hillary Clinton and her top aides regarding the handling of classified information through a private email server, the FBI would not refer criminal charges to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Justice Department.

 

Curiously, Berger, Lynch and Cheryl Mills all worked as partners in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson, which prepared tax returns for the Clintons and did patent work for a software firm that played a role in the private email server Hillary Clinton used when she was secretary of state.

 

With Hillary making another run for president, don’t get caught up in the lies and spin! In “Hillary Unhinged: In Her Own Words,” find out who the true Hillary is with this raw and humorous collection of quotes that pitilessly underscores her hypocrisy

 

Lynch and Comey both served as U.S. attorney in New York, Lynch for the Eastern District of New York, and Comey for the Southern District of New York. They crossed paths in the investigation of HSBC bank, which avoided criminal charges in a massive money-laundering scandal for which the bank paid a $1.9 billion fine.

 

After Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself in the Valerie Plame affair in 2004, Comey appointed as special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who ended up convicting “Scooter” Libby, a top aide to then Vice President Dick Cheney, of perjury and obstruction of justice. The charge was based on the accusations of Plame and her former ambassador husband, Joe Wilson – both partisan supporters of Bill and Hillary Clinton – that Libby outed her as a CIA agent.

 

New York Times reporter Judith Miller’s 2015 memoir strongly suggests Fitzgerald improperly manipulated testimony and withheld crucial evidence in obtaining a conviction against Libby in his 2007 trial.

 

Prosecutor in Berger case

 

As deputy attorney general, Comey was involved in the investigation of Berger, as Fox News reported in 2004

 
Berger at that time was under criminal investigation by the Justice Department for removing from the National Archives various classified documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission investigating the 9/11 terror attacks and for removing handwritten notes he made while reviewing the documents.

 

The New York Times reported in 2005 that Republican leaders speculated Berger removed the documents from the National Archives because he was trying to conceal material that could be damaging to the Clinton administration.

 
There is no evidence Comey’s investigation for the Justice Department made any attempt to determine if anyone affiliated with the Clinton White House prompted Berger or coordinated with him in the decision to remove the classified documents.

 
Various statements Comey made about Berger’s mishandling of classified documents bear comparison to his comments regarding Hillary Clinton’s email server.

 

In 2004, Fox News noted Comey told reporters he could not comment on the Berger investigation but did address the general issue of mishandling classified documents.

 

“As a general matter, we take issues of classified information very seriously,” Comey said in response to a reporter’s question.

 

 

On April 1, 2005, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of intentionally removing documents from the National Archives and destroying some of them. He was fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and two years of probation. Also, his national security license was stripped for two years.

 

Messages found stored on Clinton’s private email server show that Berger – a convicted thief of classified documents – had been advising Clinton while she served as secretary of state and had access to emails containing classified information.

 

For example, READ ENTIRETY (COMEY HAS LONG HISTORY OF CASES ENDING FAVORABLE TO CLINTONS: In Berger probe said ‘we take issues of classified information very seriously; By JEROME R. CORSI; WND; 7/7/16)

 

n3angus

July 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM

 

When our Society sees a Ruling class that is not held to the same standards as We the People are, just like how the ruling class gets healthcare that’s not the same as what the Society is now mandated to buy, and when the same standards like what we have been seeing regarding the Clinton Network with nothing being done about it, it creates a Culture of Disrespect to evolve within the Society. Then Society starts to breakdown and divide on itself!!!!

 
And it could be that we are seeing this going on behind the scenes. Remember this: “Top Down, Bottom Up, Inside-out”??????

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13smJ9IVjlM

 

VIDEO: Progressive Chaos: Top-Down Bottom-Up, Inside-Out!

 

Posted by GusDeSoto

Uploaded on Feb 18, 2011

 

2/18/2011 – After the chaos and unrest in Europe, then in the Middle East, just as Glenn Beck predicted, the TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM UP and INSIDE OUT strategy talked about by Van Jones is coming to pass. Along with Jones’ incit[e]ment to get liberal progressive[s] to act on his model, there have been stories published and written by Frances Fox Piven, again, inciting people to get mad at the government, in a sense, inciting unrest and riots, due in part to the economic conditions of our nation. This is what one would consider a well-orchestrated “insurrection” by the mainstream media, unions and even the government. How will it end?

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Brackets indicate Editor insertions

 

© Tony Newbill

Republican Party’s Fiascos


Justin O. Smith is a frequent contributor to this blog. I tell you this because every once in a while Justin’s Father Robert makes a contribution. This is one of those cases.

Robert Smith has become weary of politicians in Congress NOT making decisions for the good of the citizens (i.e. WE THE PEOPLE) of the United States of America. Robert assumes that Conservatives still have the Founding Fathers’ vision of Liberty and Freedom for Americans whose government is supposed to be “… as the Founding Fathers recognized, to protect people’s inalienable rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness.” (The italic text is a quote from: The American Right, the Purpose of Government, and the Future of Liberty; By Craig Biddle; The Objective Standard, Winter 2011, Vol. 6, No. 4.)

President Abraham Lincoln fought a war to preserve the Union of the United States of America to preserve and establish a more perfect union of States in which the role of government, in line with the vision of the Founding Fathers, was pronounced in November 1963 a few months after the Battle of Gettysburg:

We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom; and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” (LINCOLN’S FAMOUS QUOTE AND ITS INSPIRATION [closing words of his Gettysburg Address, delivered on November 19, 1863]; quote/counterquote; 3/2/15)

Robert has correctly surmised that our Congress has forsaken this original vision transforming America from a people oriented Representative Republic into a ruling elite acting government telling people how to live and how to believe that what humanity feels is the best virtue of morality. I surmise Robert’s target of unconstitutional elitists are the Democrats and the GOP Establishment.

JRH 6/23/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Republican Party’s Fiascos

By Robert Smith

Sent: 6/23/2015 5:17 AM

Our Senators and Representatives are sent to Washington by “we the people” to read the bills presented to them. It is then incumbent on them to explain to us, their constituents, and the contents of those bills, along with the reasons that they are either good or bad for our country.

Congress recently passed the Trade Promotion Authority bill, in part, for greater transparency and so we can read it. In other words, do their job and read it for them.

I do not need to read the bill, simply from understanding that it opens an easier path for passing the Trans-Pacific Partnership through a simple majority vote.; I do not need to read bills, such as these, in order to know that they are not in the best interests of our country. All one needs to do is to view the results from the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the ensuing mass exodus of our U S companies to other countries.

Since our Senators and Representatives cannot, or will not, do their jobs, we need to fire them. To rid ourselves of our Representatives is relatively easy, since every two years they seek re-election. With our Senators, it is more complicated, since their terms are for six years and in only 18 states have provisions to recall their Senators. Where does your state stand? Is it one of the 18 or not? If it is not take action ensure that your state will have the ability to recall your Senators.

It is time – it is past time – that we charge the State Legislatures with the task of legislating a procedure that enables us to recall our Senators. If our

Legislators cannot or will not do this they can be replaced in 2016.

I am fed up with the RINOs (Republican – In – Name – Only) that are holding positions in the House of Representatives and the Senate. So, as voters, review their past records and make certain that they are true conservatives before casting your vote for any one.

Today in a large part, many of our country’s problems stem from the people who are far too willing to take the words of liars or idiots or both; it is time for us to throw the liars and idiots out of office.

In all of my 89 years I have never seen so much apathy in the voters. It is as though they do not care about our country’s current condition and sad state of affairs. For the people who still love the USA, vote conservative and ensure the person you vote for is a true conservative.

PSG [ret] R. G. Smith

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Robert G. Smith