Newbill Conspiracy Issues


one-nation-under-dems

Emails sent by Tony Newbill

Posted February 17, 2017

 

Pseudonymous Tony Newbill broaches conspiracy issues including Muslim Refugees, Pizzagate/Ben Swann mystery, Human Trafficking, Marxist Mind Control, 1965 Paul Harvey predictions, Illegal Passports, GMO-Depopulation, Monsanto, Big Government Intrusion and Toxic Mercury Vaccines. Whew. A lot to digest.

 

JRH 2/17/17

Please Support NCCR

***********

MONEY is the DRIVING Force behind the OUTRAGE over Extreme Vetting of refugees!!!!

2/1/2017 9:02 AM

 

This outrage by the Left over extreme vetting of Immigrants and illegal immigration in general is about MONEY!!!!!  And the MONEY that these Political Obstructionists get from the Federal Government through Donations from the NGOs that benefit from Legal and Illegal Immigration operations ALSO is the MONEY that FEEDS to the MS MEDIA through Campaign advertising and other Political Advertising!!!!!

 

Here is the BREAKDOWN on how this SWAMP works!!!!!

 

Here’s why the Politicians are Pissed off over Trump wanting to stop Illegal Immigration …. They want their Money …… The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. Taxpayer

 

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/05/the-fiscal-cost-of-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty-to-the-us-taxpayer

 

SUMMARY

 

This paper provides a fiscal distribution analysis of households headed by unlawful immigrants: individuals who reside in the U.S. in violation of federal law. The paper measures the total government benefits and services received by unlawful immigrant households and the total taxes paid. The difference between benefits received and taxes paid represents the total resources transferred by government on behalf of unlawful immigrants from the rest of society.

 

KEY TAKEAWAYS

 

  • There are approximately 3.7 million unlawful immigrant households in the U.S. These households impose a net fiscal burden of around $54.5 billion per year.

 

  • Amnesty for unlawful immigrants can pose large fiscal costs for U.S. taxpayers including public education, welfare benefits, and other benefits and services.

 

  • Policymakers must ensure that the interaction of welfare and other financial transfer programs with immigration does not expand the fiscally dependent population.

 

READ THE REST (The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. Taxpayer; Contributors: Jason Richwine, Ph.D. and Robert Rector; Heritage Foundation; 5/6/13)

 

Illegal immigration is a money-maker for everyone but taxpayers

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/illegal-immigration-is-a-money-maker-for-everyone-but-taxpayers/article/2551430

 

With illegal immigrant leaders picketing the White House, screaming demands that President Obama include them in “any future negotiations;” with the possibly orchestrated influx of unaccompanied children from Central America jumping the U.S. border with questionable motives; and with the White House gleefully doing anything it wants and taunting the Republicans into a suicidal impeachment frenzy over the failed rule of law, American politics is degenerating into a surreal drama of criminal hubris, strategic cunning and livid stupidity.

 

 

A major sticking point seems to be the motive: Do they come because they expect amnesty, a better life and a free ride in America? Even 51 percent of Hispanics think that’s the real motive. The us-and-them factor in this crisis is not so much racism as it is nationalism.

 

 

First comes the toll on our schools. Obama is distributing more than 100,000 school-age illegal immigrant children nationwide who bring low levels of education that will devastate classroom averages. …

 

 

The dollar cost of illegal immigrant children to schools has not been assessed, but the costs to the federal government are exact and visible to anyone who searches USASpending.gov. Enter the search term “unaccompanied alien children” and you will get the total spending since 2009: $1.1 billion — paid to various nonprofit organizations that run government-approved programs.

 

The high-dollar winner of the sweepstakes comes across as a luxury resort for the uninvited: Texas-based Southwest READ ENTIRETY (Illegal immigration is a money-maker for everyone but taxpayers; By RON ARNOLD; Washington Examiner;  7/29/14 6:15 PM)

 

++++

MASSIVE EXPOSURE NEEDED!!!!!!! CHECK THIS OUT!!!!!!

2/4/2017 11:02 AM

 

Ben Swann Silenced:

http://allnewspipeline.com/Pizzagate_Ben_Swann_Cryptic_Hints.php

 

Soon After Ben Swann’s ‘Pizzagate’ Report Went Viral, The MSM Anchor ‘Disappeared’ – Now He’s Back Leaving Cryptic Messages On Social Media, Warning He’s Going To ‘Go Dark’ On February 1st

 

What Does Ben Swann Know That We Don’t Know?

ben-swann-tweet-on-going-dark

 

According to this new story from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, soon after Atlanta’s CBS46 mainstream media news anchor Ben Swann did what was called a ‘groundbreaking’ story on what the MSM is calling ‘fake news’, #Pizzagate, Swann has been off the air. For those who may have missed it, you can see Swann in that groundbreaking look at ‘pizzagate’ in the final video below.

After the election was over and ‘pizzagate’ had largely been ‘forgotten’ and disappeared from much of the news, Swann created an online firestorm after ‘reviving’ the pizzagate story. As the lead newspaper in Atlanta reported, Swann has been off the air since then with his co-anchor Sharon Reed doing their program by herself.

And while the ‘where is Ben Swann’ stories and threads had since started hitting various websites and internet forums as well as videos such as the 2nd video below from Victurus Libertas VL, we get a brand new update from Swann himself that only adds several layers to the mystery.

 

2nd Swann Going Dark Tweet

2nd-swann-going-dark-tweet

 

… after a lengthy and unplanned hiatus, yet both his Facebook page and his Twitter page will be going dark in what appears to be a cryptic message that some have already begun to try to decode.

 

 

What is going on with Ben Swann and ‘pizzagate’ that suddenly caused him to miss work with a reappearance coming soon but a total ‘blackout’ on all of his social media? Was Swann threatened? Swann consistently has ranked as one of the most credible mainstream news performers anywhere in America and as we read in the screenshots below from his fans, people are very, very concerned about the health and safety of Swann and his family right now.

 

 

And since Swann brought pizzagate back to the MSM, his numbers in Atlanta had absolutely exploded as seen in the graphic below. However, Swann also just posted a notice to his Facebook page letting followers know that he was canceling a fundraising drive he was doing to expose the US government’s ties to ISIS. Swann did not explain why. Why the sudden changes soon after his popularity exploded as Americans realized once again that they could trust somebody in the MSM?

Hey guys, Ben Swann here… I want to thank everyone who has contributed to the ISIS video crowdfund. Unfortunately, we are not going to be moving forward with that project at this time. EVERYONE who contributed WILL BE REFUNDED THEIR FULL DONATION.

Swann had also recently done a report on the US government’s usage of propaganda and his website Truth In Media is filled with stories that the mainstream media will either never dare touch or likely will call ‘fake news’.

 

 

As this recent story over at Intellihub points out, one youtuber who has been covering ‘pizzagate’ has recently claimed that the lives of his family and loved ones had been threatened over his work covering this abomination.

And while we would never claim nor report that all of the ‘theories’ surrounding ‘pizzagate’ are true, the fact that the global elite have long been reported to have ties to such behavior absolutely proves we’ll never get the truth from them.

 

READ & VIEW ENTIRETY (Pizzagate Ben Swann Cryptic Hints; By Stefan Stanford; All News PipeLine; 1/28/17)

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/04/failure-of-american-journalism-pizzagate-and-the-muzzling-of-ben-swann/

 

Failure of American Journalism: Pizzagate and the muzzling of Ben Swann

 

“Pizzagate” is the term given to speculations and assertions that there is a pedophile network connecting Democratic Party élites and two Washington, D.C. pizzerias, Besta Pizza and Comet Ping Pong. The latter is a Disneyish pizzeria owned by a homosexual named James Alefantis, who is a former boyfriend of David Brock, a Democratic Party operative and Clinton loyalist.

 

The word “pizza” in Pizzagate isn’t just a reference to Comet Ping Pong pizzeria but stems from the many cryptic references to “pizza” and other food items (“hotdogs”; “pasta”; “tempting” “cheeses”; “yummy” “sauces”) in a collection of curious emails sent by and to John Podesta, a longtime Democratic Party operative who was White House chief of staff in Bill Clinton’s administration, White House counselor in the Obama administration and, most recently, chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

 

Some say the references to “pizza” and “hotdogs” are code words used by pedophiles …

 

 

Given the reluctance of both the MSM and AltMedia big shots like Jones and Madsen to investigate and report on Pizzagate, it was a breath of fresh air when a member of the MSM produced a TV report on the subject.

 

He is Ben Swann, an award-winning reporter and anchorman of CBS affiliate WGCL (CBS46) in Atlanta, Georgia, on which he had a regular investigative segment called “Reality Check”. Swann joined CBS46 as an anchor for its early evening and late newscasts in June 2015.

 

On January 18, 2017, CBS46 broadcasted Swann’s “Reality Check” report on Pizzagate, which Swann published to YouTube that same day:

 

https://youtu.be/l5AxV1SrTkE

 

As you can see, that video is no longer available, scrubbed from YouTube.

 

Fortunately, citizen journalists had saved Swann’s report, which you can see/hear for yourself in this video that, no doubt, will also be removed from YouTube:

 

VIDEO: BEN SWANN #PIZZAGATE BEST REPORT YET BY #MSM – UPDATE!!! – CBS HAS PULLED THIS VIDEO

 

Posted by Victurus Libertas VL

Published on Jan 18, 2017

1/19 – BREAKING – CBS HAS PULLED THIS REPORT – Ben Swann, I take my hat off to you for having the courage to report this. We are making a difference folks. We are making people look at this for what it is. The more we expose #Pizzagate, the more pressure is on the MSM to report it.

http://www.cbs46.com/clip/13036440/reality-check-is-pizzagate-fake-news

 

 

Even more troubling is the fact that, after his Pizzagate report was aired, Ben Swann disappeared and was not seen anchoring CBS46’s evening news since. READ ENTIRETY (Failure of American Journalism: Pizzagate and the muzzling of Ben Swann; By Dr. Eowyn; D.C. CLOTHESLINE; 2/4/17)

 

SUPER BOWL BIGGEST HUMAN TRAFFICKING TIME!!!!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/03/super-bowl-sex-trafficking_n_2607871.html

 

When it came time for the Super Bowl, Clemmie Greenlee was expected to sleep with anywhere from 25 to 50 men a day. It’s a staggering figure, but it doesn’t shock advocates who say that the sporting event attracts more traffickers than any other in the U.S.

 

“The Super Bowl is the greatest show on Earth, but it also has an ugly underbelly,” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott told USA Today in 2011 when his state was gearing up to host the event. “It’s commonly known as the single largest human trafficking incident in the United States.”

 

The influx of fans fosters the optimal breeding ground for pimps looking to boost their profits. Experts say that the sheer number of men looking to pay for sex substantially increases demand and the massive crowds allow for pimps and victims to READ THE REST (Super Bowl Is Single Largest Human Trafficking Incident In U.S.: Attorney General; By Eleanor Goldberg; HuffPo; 02/03/2013 09:04 am ET | Updated 2/6/13)

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201304/human-trafficking-in-america

 

Human Trafficking In America

 

Human Trafficking is defined by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime as “the acquisition of people by improper means such as force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them.” Sex is just one aspect of trafficking. Forced labor, slavery, servitude and even forced organ donation are other horrifying aspects of this disturbing and growing activity. Human trafficking rakes in an estimated $32 BILLION a year and is tied with arms dealing as the second largest criminal industry in the world (drugs are number 1). …

 

 

On American soil, the greatest problem with human trafficking is that most Americans view the issue as happening in Thailand, Russia, Asia, China or Singapore — in other words, human trafficking happens there not here. The sobering fact is that it’s not just a third world problem. It’s everyone’s problem and it’s the fastest growing illegal industry in the world, affecting us all, not just “them”.

 

It is estimated that 200,000 women annually are forced into the sex trade in the US. The majority of these are American, not imported from other countries. The largest annual human trafficking event in the US is the Super Bowl. Difficult to believe? You bet. What’s more American than the Super Bowl?

 

We think of football parties and tailgating, not men looking to pay for sex with enslaved victims. It is the party atmosphere and the enormity of the crowds which help pimps and victims to go unnoticed. During READ ENTIRETY (Human Trafficking In America; By Dale Archer M.D.; Psychology Today; 4/11/13)

 

++++++++++

Change the USA into a Communist State?

2/7/2017 10:28 AM

 

This will change the USA into a Communist state if we do not change the school curriculum!!!!!  The number-one mind-control program at US colleges

 

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/07/the-number-one-mind-control-program-at-us-colleges/#comment-207135

 

n3angus says

In comment to: The number-one mind-control program at US colleges

2/7/17 11:10 am

 

It’s obvious that the “Indoctrination process” that the colleges are using is to organize the individuals mind to except the idea of Communism. Then the globalists can implement the Central Government idea and impose the kind of restrictions that they will say is for slowing global warming but actually is to reduce the human rate of consumption and reverse the life expectancy of humans to bring on depopulation. Communism has always led to depopulation, and that’s what these globalists want. Watch this to see into the mind of a globalist, the founder of Green Peace, http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/08/opinion/gilding-earth-limits/index.html

 

+++

If I were President Trump …..

2/8/2017 11:29 AM

 

I would tweet this video link everyday for my whole term in Office!!!!!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXTkQh9sifQ

 

VIDEO: “If I were the Devil” Paul Harvey’s Warning for America 1965

 

Posted by Bible Truth

Published on Feb 14, 2015

 

Very powerful words from the ABC radio commentator Paul Harvey and his broadcast from April 3, 1965.

 

+++

FACEBOOK Funds Mind Reading Technology!!!!

2/8/2017 12:14 PM

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2814660/mark-zuckerberg-funds-bid-to-record-humans-thoughts-and-alter-their-behaviour/

 

READ YOU LIKE A FACEBOOK Chan Zuckerberg Biohub funds bid to develop mind-reading brain implants

 

FACEBOOK founder Mark Zuckerberg is funding the development of technology with the potential to read humans’ minds.

 

The billionaire has just pledged to hand over £40 million to researchers working to combat deadly diseases.

 

This cash will be distributed by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, an organisation which aims to “enable doctors to cure, prevent or manage all diseases during our children’s lifetime”.

 

Some of the projects are likely to ring alarm bells among paranoid people who fear technological progress will come at the expense of human freedom.

 

One of the researchers who will receive funding is Dr. Rikky Muller, CEO and founder of a firm called Cortera.

 

She is working to develop “clinically viable and minimally invasive neural interfaces” designed to be used by people suffering severe disabilities.

 

 

The Chan Zuckerberg Biohub wrote: “Muller is developing new wireless microsystems that directly interface with the brain for long-term, minimally-invasive neurological recording.

 

“Her broad goal is to engineer novel implants that can simultaneously sense and alter physiological responses to enable drug delivery and the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.”

 

 

However, similar technology could one day be used to directly record human thoughts and allow artificial intelligence to read our minds.

 

“With brain computer interfaces, AI can power future machines to understand human thoughts and emotions, even without physical or vocal communication,” said Debarun Guha Thakurta, a senior research analyst at Frost & Sullivan.

 

“Instead of simply mimicking the human brain structurally, AI will be able to impart human-like intelligence to machines.”

 

Any corporation that can read human thought would wield tremendous power, whilst a government with the same ability could build a totalitarian state which would make George Orwell’s 1984 look like a democratic paradise.

 

Can we trust Silicon Valley to use its powers for the benefit of humanity? READ ENTIRETY (READ YOU LIKE A FACEBOOK Chan Zuckerberg Biohub funds bid to develop mind-reading brain implants; By JASPER HAMILL; The Sun; 2/9/17 5:53 pm)

 

+++

See How Immigration is Compromised!!!!

2/14/2017 10:23 AM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9phlyYBIz8

 

VIDEO: CNN: Whistleblower reveals passport fraud

 

 

 

Posted by CNN 

Published on Feb 8, 2017

 

Are Venezuelan passports falling into the wrong hands? In a CNN exclusive interview, a whistleblower reveals alarming allegations to CNN’s Drew Griffin.

 

+++

GMO Earths Troubles Away…..

2/14/2017 11:46 AM

 

Check out How the Biologist Bureaucrats see Global Population:

 

http://www.livescience.com/5383-earth-population-limit-exceeded-white-house-adviser.html

 

Earth’s Population Limit Exceeded, White House Adviser Says

 

Nina Fedoroff, science and technology adviser to Condoleezza Rice in the last administration and now to Hillary Clinton, tells the BBC that humans have exceeded the Earth’s “limits of sustainability.”

 

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people,” Fedoroff said. Meanwhile, we need to manage water and wild land better, she said.

 

There are currently 6.77 billion of us. Some time in October 2012 we’ll cross the 7 billion mark. There are 261 people born every minute. [more facts].

 

[Read the Full Story at the BBC] (Earth’s Population Limit Exceeded, White House Adviser Says; By Live Science Staff; Live Science; 3/31/09)

 

And then here this same Biologist who said Earth has reached its Human carrying Capacity talk about making GM Insects to wipe out ZIKA Virus:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qgKOR9vm8g     

 

VIDEO: Zika virus: The GMO solution | Nina Fedoroff | TEDxMidAtlantic

 

Posted by TEDx Talks

Published on Dec 22, 2016

 

Nina Fedoroff takes us around the world to understand where the Zika virus came from, what impact it is having on women and children, and how it is now spreading here in the United States. She proposes a new solution for stopping the virus — not fumigation or pesticides, but by using biology and genetics to stop the infected mosquitos from multiplying. But there are roadblocks in the way, driven by fear and bureaucracy.

Nina V. Fedoroff received her Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from the Rockefeller University and has served on the faculties of the Carnegie Institution for Science, the Johns Hopkins University, the Pennsylvania State University, and the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Fedoroff has published three books and more than 160 scientific papers. She is a member of the U. S. National Academy of Sciences and a 2006 National Medal of Science laureate.

This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at http://ted.com/tedx

 

Monsanto to Genetically modify Life on Earth. This story is by the very Liberal Mother Jones:

 

http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2011/08/monsanto-gm-super-insects     

 

Attack of the Monsanto Superinsects

 

Over the past decade and a half, as Monsanto built up its globe-spanning, multi-billion-dollar genetically modified seed empire, it made two major pitches to farmers.

 

The first involved weeds. Leave the weed management to us, Monsanto insisted. We’ve engineered plants that can survive our very own herbicide. Just pay up for our patented, premium-priced seeds, spray your fields with our Roundup herbicide whenever the fancy strikes, and —voilà! — no more weeds.

 

The second involved crop-eating insects. We’ve isolated the toxic gene of a commonly used bacterial pesticide called Bt, Monsanto announced, and spliced it directly into crops. Along with corn and soy, you will literally be growing the pesticide that protects them. Plant our seeds, and watch your crops thrive while their pests shrivel and die.

 

 

And now insects are developing resistance to Monsanto’s insecticide-infused crops, reports the Wall Street Journal. Fields planted in Monsanto’s Bt corn in some areas of the Midwest are showing damage from the corn rootworm—the very species targeted by Monsanto’s engineered trait. An Iowa State University scientist has conclusively identified Bt-resistant root worms in four Iowa fields, the Journal reports.

 

The findings are not likely isolated to those fields—just like spotting a cockroach on your kitchen floor probably signals an infestation, not that a lone cockroach randomly stumbled in for a visit. Sure enough READ ENTIRETY (Attack of the Monsanto Superinsects; By TOM PHILPOTT; Mother Jones; 8/30/11 5:04 AM)

 

So, if they are questioning this, then it is worth questioning because at the same time the Liberal Fact Checking site Snopes is calling this topic False, and Snopes is VERY protective of Monsanto so why is that? http://www.snopes.com/tag/monsanto/  [- tag articles as of 2/17/17:]

 

Fact Check Medical

Monsanto Suppressing Evidence of Cancerous Herbicide in Food?

Nov 16th, 2016 – A laboratory test performed by food activists is going viral, but its results and the allegations drawn from them are not reliable.

 

Fact Check Business

Monsanto Buys Whole Foods

Jul 7th, 2016 – A number of blog posts objecting to the Whole Foods CEO’s comments about GMO labeling rejuvenated an old rumor that Monsanto bought the grocery chain.

 

Fact Check

Zika Microcephaly Outbreak Caused by Monsanto Pesticide?

Feb 17th, 2016 – An unsubstantiated theory suggesting a Monsanto pesticide caused an uptick in microcephaly births in Brazil reached a tipping point when it was promoted by George Takei.

 

Fact Check Politics

Hillary Clinton Sat on the Monsanto Board?

Feb 8th, 2016 – Hillary Clinton never sat on Monsanto’s board of directors, nor does she maintain any known fundraising ties with the agribusiness giant.

 

And Why is Congress Protecting Monsanto???

 

http://www.snopes.com/monsanto-protection-act/     

 

Monsanto Protection Act

Does the Monsanto Protection Act create a ‘precedent-setting limitation on judicial review of genetically-engineered crops’?

 

CLAIM:   The Monsanto Protection Act creates a “precedent-setting limitation on judicial review of genetically-engineered crops.”

 

snopes-check  MIXTURE

 

EXAMPLE: [Collected via e-mail, March 2013]

 

I received an email regarding The Monsanto Protection Act is this true?

 

On March 21st, Congress passed The Monsanto Protection Act that was slipped into a short term budget resolution. This dangerous rider found in Section 735 of the bill would create a precedent-setting limitation on judicial review of genetically-engineered crops, allowing them to be planted without federal safeguards in place that protect our environment, family farmers and citizens.

 

Call President Obama today; tell him to strike section 735 from the 2013 Continuing Resolution. Add your voice to the groundswell in response to this dangerous bill!

 

Together we WILL be setting right this gross imbalance!

 

ORIGINS:   On 26 March 2013, President Obama signed into law a bill passed by the House and Senate earlier that month known as the “Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013” to provide funding for various federal agencies through the end of the 2013 fiscal year. One of the provisions included in that bill in the section for “Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and related agencies” was Section 735, variously dubbed the “Farmer Assurance Provision” or the “‘Monsanto Protection Act,” an inclusion which reignited a clash between the agribusiness industry and food safety groups. The former maintains that the Farmer Assurance Provision prevents activists from manipulating the court system to force farmers to abandon or destroy genetically modified (GMO) or genetically engineered (GE) crops that have already received U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) safety approval; the latter assert that Congress kowtowed to big business by sneaking into an appropriations bill a provision that allows large biotech companies like Monsanto to do an end run around the court system and avoid legitimate legal challenges to the safety of their products:

 

 

The provision directs the Secretary of Agriculture to grant temporary deregulation status to allow growers to continue the cultivation of biotech crops that had previously been approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) while legal challenges to the safety of those crops are underway, and it prevents courts from interceding in the review process — a situation which critics contend unconstitutionally bars the court system from taking part in ensuring the safety of food products:

 

 

The provisions of this bill (including the “Monsanto Protection Act”) were originally to remain in effect for six months, until the end of the fiscal year on 30 September 2013. The bill was later extended to expire on 15 December 2013.

 

LAST UPDATED:   13 September 2013 READ ENTIRETY (Monsanto Protection Act; Snopes)

 

So, 2 liberal activists contradicting each other is worth noting!!!!!!

 

And we are to trust the same Bureaucracy that sees the world as Over populated? HA!!!  Read this from the Washington Post 13 years ago, Tempe, AZ: I’ve heard that researchers are playing around with honeybees. Will my honey still be safe to eat if the honeybees are genetically modified?

 

Michael Fernandez: Yes, scientists are attempting to genetically engineer honeybees to resist parasites and diseases and protect them from pesticides. It would be FDA’s responsibility to ensure that honey from GM honeybees would be safe for consumers:

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A39103-2004Jan22.html

 

Michael Fernandez of the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology was online to answer reader questions on his organization’s new report on scientific research into genetically modified insects.

 

Research is already underway to create mosquitos that are incapable of carrying malaria. In a Jan. 22 article, Washington Post reporter Justin Gillis wrote: “The Pew report noted that someone is going to have to decide what kind of research is needed to estimate the likely effects, and then decide whether the benefits of releasing the designer mosquitoes are worth the risks. And that decision will have to be made in a complex international environment: Many African and Asian countries are ill-equipped to assess elaborate genetic technologies, and their citizens are sometimes suspicious even of simple technologies designed in the West.”

 

A transcript of today’s discussion is below:

 

Editor’s Note: Washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Live Online discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions.

 

 

Michael Fernandez: The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology was established in 2001, supported by a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts to the University of Richmond.

 

We advocate neither for, nor against, agricultural biotechnology, but instead provide information, encourage debate and dialogue about the benefits/risks of agricultural biotechnology so that consumers, the media and policymakers can make their own informed decisions.

 

We provide a wealth of information, including our reports, meeting proceedings, polling data and research, for free on our web site at www.pewagbiotech.org.

 

READ ENTIRETY (The Risks of ‘Designer Insects’; Transcript of Michael Fernandez Q/A; Washington Post; 1/28/04 11:00 AM)

 

+++

Newbill Link to Convention of States Article & Video

2/14/2017 10:17 PM

Subject: please watch the Video

 

http://www.conventionofstates.com/this_fisherman_is_risking_his_livelihood/?recruiter_id=31606

 

VIDEO: This Fisherman Is Battling the Government to Save His Livelihood

 

Posted by Cause of Action Institute

Published on Feb 6, 2017

industry’s regulators, however, have embarked on a project that threatens its imminent destruction.

Meet New Hampshire fisherman David Goethel. The federal government is destroying Mr. Goethel’s industry through overregulation and forcing ground-fishermen like himself to pay $700 per day to have authorities monitor them on their boats. Even the government estimates these additional costs would put 60% of the industry out of business. Cause of Action Institute is helping Mr. Goethel fight back through the courts to save his livelihood.

#FreeTheFishermen

 

Federal regulations have real consequences for real people.

 

Cause of Action Institute released a powerful four-minute documentary detailing the effects of “at-sea monitors” on local fishermen in New England. The federal government makes fishermen pay for these monitors, who do nothing but watch the crew fish and sort their catch. The cost? Seven-hundred dollars per day at sea, all of which is paid by the local fisherman.

 

That burden is more than many fishermen can bear, and it’s forcing thousands of family-owned boats out of business. David Goethel, for example, has READ THE REST (This fisherman is risking his livelihood to fight tyrannical federal regulations; Posted by Convention of States Project; 2/13/17)

 

+++

ROBERT DE NIRO AND ROBERT KENNEDY HOLDING PRESS CONFERENCE

2/15/2017 10:14 AM

 

2/15/2017, 9:30AM ET: ROBERT DE NIRO AND ROBERT KENNEDY PRESS CONFERENCE ON TOXIC MERCURY IN VACCINES

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/breaking-breaking-now-robert-de-niro-and-robert-kennedy-holding-press-conference-now-announcing-toxic-mercury-in-vaccines/

 

Update: 10:00AM EST… It started at 10AM EST. Infowars is live-streaming it as a ‘Facebook Mentions’ here:

 

8:50AM EST…

 

DEVELOPING… I’ve just received word that, in a few minutes, at the National Press Club, in Washington DC, Robert De Niro and Robert F Kennedy Jr. are issuing a challenge to all media and all scientists…

 

They will give $100,000 to anyone who can show one published study that proves mercury in flu vaccines—at the levels it is injected—is safe.

 

The press conference will begin at 9:15am EST. National Press Club here.

 

This is named THE WORLD MERCURY PROJECT CHALLENGE.

 

Will the press conference be broadcast? That’s up to the media attending. Will they have the guts? Infowars has said they will be there to cover it (live steamed?).

 

 

I’m told that CNN backed out of attending the press conference, and now they’re in again…

 

Del Bigtree, producer of the film Vaxxed (trailer), will also speak at the press conference.

 

Kennedy states that Trump contacted him to head up a commission investigating vaccine safety. According to Kennedy, Trump said he knew he was going up against Big Pharma, but he was ready for the battle.

 

At this moment, De Niro and Kennedy are sitting in a small broadcast room at READ ENTIRETY (ROBERT DE NIRO AND ROBERT KENNEDY PRESS CONFERENCE ON TOXIC MERCURY IN VACCINES; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 2/15/2017, 9:30AM ET)

 

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Most text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

Obama’s Shadow Government Is Organizing To Undermine Trump


shadow-govt

Here are some more thoughts on Barack Obama exercising a Leftist Shadow Government to bring down President Donald Trump. Previous post: “Obama Post-President Treason”.

 

JRH 2/16/17

Please Support NCCR

****************

Obama’s Shadow Government Is Organizing To Undermine Trump

 

By John Daniel Davidson

FEBRUARY 16, 2017

The Federalist

 

The leaks that led to Michael Flynn’s resignation are just the beginning. Obama and his loyalists in and outside government are working to undermine Trump.

 

Once out of office, ex-presidents usually fade into private life and stay out of politics. They write memoirs, serve on corporate boards, and start charitable foundations. George W. Bush retired to his ranch in Texas and, most recently, painted portraits of veterans wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bill Clinton was briefly thrust back into politics during Hillary’s two failed presidential campaigns, but most of his post-White House career consisted of flying around the world raising boatloads of money for his family’s now-defunct charity.

 

There are exceptions, of course. Jimmy Carter threw himself into international diplomacy, mediating an agreement in 1994 to return exiled President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power in Haiti, and generally agitating for a Palestinian state.

 

Then there is Obama. Less than a month out of office, the broad contours of Obama’s post-presidency career are already taking shape. Obama and his loyalists, it seems, will remain in the center of the political fray, officially and unofficially, in an organized effort to undermine the Trump administration.

 

The bizarre scandal now unfolding over the resignation of national security advisor Michael Flynn is a case in point. Flynn’s resignation was prompted by a series of coordinated and anonymous leaks from current and former Obama administration officials in our domestic intelligence agencies.

 

Regardless of any valid criticism of Flynn, the leaks are part of a larger, loosely organized effort now underway to preserve Obama’s legacy. This effort involves Obama-era officials still inside the federal government, former Obama staffers working in the private sector, and Obama himself.

 

This isn’t some conspiracy theory. After the election, Obama indicated he intends to stay involved in the political fray. In an email to his supporters on his last day in office, Obama encouraged them to stay engaged, promising “I’ll be right there with you every step of the way.” Less than two weeks later, he issued a statement saying he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests over the executive order on immigration.

 

Obama Is Jumping Back Into The Political Fray

 

But there’s more to all this than Obama issuing solidarity statements to Trump protestors. For one thing, the former president isn’t moving back to Chicago. The Obama family will remain in Washington DC, within a couple miles of the White House, for the next two years as Obama’s youngest daughter finishes high school.

 

From there, Obama will help direct his new foundation, which he has said will be a “startup for citizenship.” That could mean a lot things, but in light of his other plans it suggests the Obama Foundation will be a political grassroots organization designed to mobilize progressive activists.

 

Obama has also announced he’ll be working with former Attorney General Eric Holder on a political action group called the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. Its goal is to get Democrats elected at the state and local level ahead of the next redrawing of congressional districts. Last month, Obama reportedly met with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe to strategize about redistricting.

 

In addition to these pursuits, the former president will likely play a prominent role in a network of progressive nonprofits, most notably Organizing for Action, the political group that grew out of Obama’s first campaign. OFA has kept a low profile in recent years, and if Clinton had won it likely would have shut down.

 

But last week, OFA officials told NBC News the organization was ramping up operations nationwide in an effort to preserve Obama’s signature achievements like the Affordable Care Act. As part of that effort, the group recently hired 14 field organizers in key states, adding to a growing infrastructure that boasts more than 250 offices nationwide and more than 32,000 volunteers.

 

Former Obama Staffers Are Speaking Out

 

Obama of course isn’t alone in all this. Trump’s victory has mobilized his top aides and staffers to take action, too. Former Obama staffer Tommy Vietor told the Daily Beast that, had Clinton won, “I would have been inclined to feel comfortable that Obama’s legacy and the things we worked on were safe.”

 

Instead, Vietor, along with former Obama administration staffers Jon Favreau and Jon Lovett, are launching a new podcast, Pod Save America, under their new joint media venture, Crooked Media.

 

The purpose of the company should be fairly obvious. “In the battle between Donald Trump and the media, we are firmly on the side of the media,” Favreau told the Daily Beast, adding that he’s not interested in “the veneer of objectivity.” “We’re always going to be Obama guys, we’re very open and honest about that.”

 

Favreau has also been helping create Obama’s new foundation, whose mission, he says, “is to get people involved in civic life and get people engaged in politics.” Of Crooked Media, Favreau says, “I think we would very much like to be the media company version of that. So it’s certainly inspired by a lot of what Obama has talked about in terms of the media over the last several months.”

 

A host of other former Obama staffers have simply taken to social media to voice their opposition to Trump. One former senior administration official told Yahoo News, “There are more than a few of us who believe deeply in holding this administration’s feet to the fire—especially when they offer falsehoods to the American people and distort our record. We have an email chain going where we share impressions, etc.”

 

As the leaks keep flowing from our intelligence agencies and the tweets keep flying from former Obama officials, keep in mind that although we haven’t heard much from Obama himself yet, the Trump administration is going to keep feeling the disruptions of what amounts to a shadow government.

 

Obama had eight years in the White House to secure his legacy. Any efforts on his part to undermine his successor aren’t just an affront to the principles of our democracy, they’re an admission that he and his acolytes never put much stock in democracy to begin with.

________________

John is a senior correspondent for The Federalist. Follow him on Twitter.

 

Copyright © 2017 The Federalist, a wholly independent division of FDRLST Media, All Rights Reserved.

 

Obama Post-President Treason


obama-traitor-cicero-quote

John R. Houk

© February 15, 2017

 

Michael Flynn ousted by Dem fake outrage and MSM fake news, WHY?

 

The experts I have heard claim to the best of their knowledge that Flynn broke no laws by communicating with the Russians prior to President Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2017. Rather the resignation occurred because of the Dem harassment and Flynn apparently lied about the content to Vice President Pence.

 

AND YET the Dems are still crucifying both Flynn and Trump over a communication that was quite normal for a presidential transition team from election day through Inauguration Day.

alinsky-rules-for-radical-bk-jk

The “WHY” has volumes to do with former President Barack Hussein Obama trying to destroy the Trump Administration ala Alinsky’sRules for Radicals”.

 

President should rethink not going after traitors of the former Obama Administration in draining the swamp – AS IN GOING AFTER THE TRAITORS!

 

JRH 2/15/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Former Obama Officials, Loyalists Waged Secret Campaign to Oust Flynn

Sources: Former Obama officials, loyalists planted series of stories to discredit Flynn, bolster Iran deal

 

By Adam Kredo

February 14, 2017 3:26 pm

Washington Free Beacon

 

The abrupt resignation Monday evening of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn is the culmination of a secret, months-long campaign by former Obama administration confidantes to handicap President Donald Trump’s national security apparatus and preserve the nuclear deal with Iran, according to multiple sources in and out of the White House who described to the Washington Free Beacon a behind-the-scenes effort by these officials to plant a series of damaging stories about Flynn in the national media.

 

The effort, said to include former Obama administration adviser Ben Rhodes—the architect of a separate White House effort to create what he described as a pro-Iran echo chamber—included a small task force of Obama loyalists who deluged media outlets with stories aimed at eroding Flynn’s credibility, multiple sources revealed.

 

The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump administration’s efforts to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that had been long hidden by the Obama administration.

 

Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told the Free Beacon that these Obama loyalists plotted in the months before Trump’s inauguration to establish a set of roadblocks before Trump’s national security team, which includes several prominent opponents of diplomacy with Iran. The Free Beacon first reported on this effort in January.

 

Sources who spoke to the Free Beacon requested anonymity in order to speak freely about the situation and avoid interfering with the White House’s official narrative about Flynn, which centers on his failure to adequately inform the president about a series of phone calls with Russian officials.

 

Flynn took credit for his missteps regarding these phone calls in a brief statement released late Monday evening. Trump administration officials subsequently stated that Flynn’s efforts to mislead the president and vice president about his contacts with Russia could not be tolerated.

 

However, multiple sources closely involved in the situation pointed to a larger, more secretive campaign aimed at discrediting Flynn and undermining the Trump White House.

 

“It’s undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of leaks designed to undermine him,” said one veteran national security adviser with close ties to the White House team. “This pattern reminds me of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of characters.”

 

The Free Beacon first reported in January that, until its final days in office, the Obama administration hosted several pro-Iran voices who were critical in helping to mislead the American public about the terms of the nuclear agreement. This included a former Iranian government official and the head of the National Iranian American Council, or NIAC, which has been accused of serving as Iran’s mouthpiece in Washington, D.C.

 

Since then, top members of the Obama administration’s national security team have launched a communications infrastructure after they left the White House, and have told reporters they are using that infrastructure to undermine Trump’s foreign policy.

 

“It’s actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are celebrating today,” said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close to Flynn and the White House. “They know that the number one target is Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the [secret] agreements even surfaced.”

 

Flynn had been preparing to publicize many of the details about the nuclear deal that had been intentionally hidden by the Obama administration as part of its effort to garner support for the deal, these sources said.

 

Flynn is now “gone before anybody can see what happened” with these secret agreements, said the second insider close to Flynn and the White House.

 

Sources in and out of the White House are concerned that the campaign against Flynn will be extended to other prominent figures in the Trump administration.

 

One senior White House official told the Free Beacon that leaks targeting the former official were “not the result of a series of random events.”

 

“The drumbeat of leaks of sensitive material related to General Flynn has been building since he was named to his position,” said the official, who is a member of the White House’s National Security Council. “Last night was not the result of a series of random events. The president has lost a valuable adviser and we need to make sure this sort of thing does not happen again.”

 

Other sources expressed concern that public trust in the intelligence community would be eroded by the actions of employees with anti-Trump agendas.

 

“The larger issue that should trouble the American people is the far-reaching power of unknown, unelected apparatchiks in the Intelligence Community deciding for themselves both who serves in government and what is an acceptable policy they will allow the elected representatives of the people to pursue,” said the national security adviser quoted above.

 

“Put aside the issue of Flynn himself; that nameless, faceless bureaucrats were able to take out a president’s national security adviser based on a campaign of innuendo without evidence should worry every American,” the source explained.

 

Eli Lake, a Bloomberg View columnist and veteran national security reporter well sourced in the White House, told the Free Beacon that Flynn earned a reputation in the Obama administration as one of its top detractors.

 

“Michael Flynn was one of the Obama administration’s fiercest critics after he was forced out of the Defense Intelligence Agency,” said Lake, who described “the political assassination of Michael Flynn” in his column published early Tuesday.

 

“[Flynn] was a withering critic of Obama’s biggest foreign policy initiative, the Iran deal,” Lake said. “He also publicly accused the administration of keeping classified documents found in the Osama bin Laden raid that showed Iran’s close relationship with al Qaeda. He was a thorn in their side.”

 

Lake noted in his column that he does not buy fully the White House’s official spin on Flynn’s resignation.

 

“For a White House that has such a casual and opportunistic relationship with the truth, it’s strange that Flynn’s ‘lie’ to Pence would get him fired,” Lake wrote. “It doesn’t add up.”

 

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated in his daily briefing that “the evolving and eroding level of trust as a result of this situation and a series of other questionable incidents is what led the president to ask General Flynn for his resignation.”

 

A third source who serves as a congressional adviser and was involved in the 2015 fight over the Iran deal told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration feared that Flynn would expose the secret agreements with Iran.

 

“The Obama administration knew that Flynn was going to release the secret documents around the Iran deal, which would blow up their myth that it was a good deal that rolled back Iran,” the source said. “So in December the Obama NSC started going to work with their favorite reporters, selectively leaking damaging and incomplete information about Flynn.”

 

“After Trump was inaugurated some of those people stayed in and some began working from the outside, and they cooperated to keep undermining Trump,” the source said, detailing a series of leaks from within the White House in the past weeks targeting Flynn. “Last night’s resignation was their first major win, but unless the Trump people get serious about cleaning house, it won’t be the last.”

+++

Blog Editor: Of interest of post-President Obama agenda:

 

 

 

______________

Obama Post-President Treason

John R. Houk

© February 15, 2017

________________

Adam Kredo   Email Adam | Full Bio 

Adam Kredo is senior writer for the Washington Free Beacon. Formerly an award-winning political reporter for the Washington Jewish Week, where he frequently broke national news, Kredo’s work has been featured in outlets such as the Jerusalem Post, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, and Politico, among others. He lives in Maryland with his comic books. His Twitter handle is @Kredo0. His email address is kredo@freebeacon.com.

 

©2017 All Rights Reserved.

 

About Washington Free Beacon

 

“How stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous, more secure, and happier than it was eight years ago. But more than that: After 200 years, two centuries, she still stands strong and true on the granite ridge, and her glow has held steady no matter what storm. And she’s still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.” —Ronald Reagan, Farewell Address, January 11, 1989

 

The Washington Free Beacon is a privately owned, for-profit online newspaper that began publication on February 7, 2012. Dedicated to uncovering the stories that the powers that be hope will never see the light of day, the Free Beacon produces in-depth investigative reporting on a wide range of issues, including public policy, government affairs, international security, and media. Whether it’s exposing cronyism, finding out just who is shaping our domestic and foreign policy and why, or highlighting the threats to American security and peace in a dangerous world, the Free Beacon is committed to serving the public interest by reporting news and information that is not being fully covered by other news organizations.

 

The Beacon’s chairman is Michael Goldfarb. Its editor in chief is READ THE REST 

 

The 9th Court Usurps Power!


Richard Clifton, Michelle Friedland, and William Canby.
Richard Clifton, Michelle Friedland, and William Canby.

9th Circuit Appellate Justices Richard Clifton, Michelle Friedland, and William Canby.

 

Justin Smith reasoning demonstrates the hypocrisy and idiocy of the American Left’s rabid reaction to President Trump temporarily banning immigration and refugees from seven nations that Islamic terrorism is a hotbed of death.

 

JRH 2/14/17

Please Support NCCR

**************

The 9th Court Usurps Power!

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/13/2017 7:19 AM

 

President Trump doesn’t need to issue any new travel ban order, that may or may not please the anti-American activist judges of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal or other supporters of Islam and Sharia law (see Justice Elena Kagan’s tenure at Harvard University), open borders and international communism in the Supreme Court and within America’s own population. His original order was well within the U.S. Constitution and the law, and, in order to stop this current intrusion on the President’s authority in areas of foreign policy and national security, a usurpation of power and a judicial coup d’état, President Trump should defy the 9th Court and set to work with the Republican majority and any agreeable Democrats to limit the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution and reclaim stolen legislative powers for Congress.

 

It has universally been acknowledged for over 230 years that the President, the United States Commander-in-Chief, has broad authority and great leeway in all matters of immigration and foreign policy and national security [Judge Napolitano & NRO], which places the recent ruling of leftist activist judges Michelle Friedland (Obama appointee) and William Canby Jr. (Carter appointee) on par with an act of treason. These two judges are so willing to give President Trump a political black eye, allowing Trump’s “Muslim ban” campaign statements to be used in the evaluation of his executive order, that they have ignored the law, circumvented the Constitution and violated the separation of powers clause between coequal branches of government; and, they have blatantly dismissed the reality  of refugees, who can’t prove who they are and whether or not they have any ties to Islamic terrorist groups, while allowing district judge James Robart, another leftist activist judge (notwithstanding being a Bush appointee), to absurdly overrule the President of the United States on border security during wartime.

 

There is not any manner of violation against the U.S. Constitution and the 1965 Immigration Act in President Trump’s travel ban. Trump isn’t discriminating against anyone, but rather, he is looking at seven nations from a security threat assessment, which were already determined to be state sponsors of terror by former President Obama and his advisors, addressed in Section 1187 (a) (12) of an Obama-era provision of the immigration law.

 

And also in his executive order, President Trump expressly cites 1182 (f), enacted in 1952, which states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such time as he may deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants … “. [Blog Editor: bold-italics is Editor’s]

 

In 1893, America was detaining approximately 20 percent of all hopeful immigrants reaching Ellis Island, due to sickness and disabilities, and anarchists and the insane were automatically rejected [Blog Editor: History.com point 4-  Immigrants were subject to physical and mental exams to ensure they were fit for admittance to the United States]. About two percent of these immigrants were judged unfit to become U.S. citizens and sent home on the next ship. By the 1920s, our government established quotas based on nationality and skill. And the majority of Americans have always understood that just like anyone has the right to decide who enters their home, so too, our nation has that same sovereign right.

 

No “moral obligation” to these refugees exists that can compel us to allow them to enter without knowing for certain who they are. The moral obligation to open our doors, often mentioned by the Leftists and International Communists, doesn’t mean America must throw reason and caution to the wind.

 

People who do not share our values — Islamofascists seeking to reach America’s shores and murder Americans — and anti-American “refugees” seeking to transform America into a Balkanized hell are not welcome here.

 

Why weren’t all of these anti-American leftist judges evoking Emma Lazarus and Lady Liberty lifting her lamp “beside the golden door” when President Clinton sent little 6 year old Elian Gonzalez back to a communist dictatorship in Cuba, under the executive branch’s broad power? Or when President Obama turned away real refugees fleeing Castro’s oppression “yearning to breathe free“? [Blog Editor: See Also Breitbart & 100% Fed Up]

 

America doesn’t have to destroy its cultural identity by helping foreigners, but this is precisely what Democrat commie bastards such as President Johnson and Senator Ted Kennedy intended to accomplish through the 1965 Immigration Act. This one law has eroded our cultural identity severely and created extremely detrimental demographic changes over time. And most recently, former President Obama specifically brought in one million immigrants from Muslim majority countries like Kosovo, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Pakistan, even though these countries were the origin of terrorists that have already attacked America.

 

Many of America’s “progressive” Leftists consider the destruction of America, as we know it, to be a desirable goal, however, most Americans reject their fundamental change. Americans who love this country want a strong America, that will be able to defeat the dangerous ideologies currently threatening Western Civilization.

 

Rebuke the disingenuous pious progressives who decry those of us supporting the President’s executive order as anti-immigrant and issue flowery utterances on sanctuary, when sanctuary is for the truly persecuted innocents, like the Christians in the Middle East. Exercising our first responsibility to protect ourselves and Our Beloved America bears no shame.

 

Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ala) stated that Trump’s executive order was “plainly legal” under both statute and the Constitution, adding: “No foreigner has a constitutional right to enter the United States and courts ought not second-guess sensitive national security decisions of the President. This misguided ruling is from the 9th Circuit, the most notoriously left-wing court in America and the most reversed court at the Supreme Court.

 

Representative Mo Brooks (R-Ala) said, “Unfortunately, American lives are at risk until this unfounded and reckless [9th Court restraining] order is reversed by the Supreme Court.”

 

How can Americans trust unreliable and corrupt courts with our national security? The Supreme Court ruled Obamacare to be both constitutional and a tax, after Obama called it a “penalty” for years. The courts have overturned the will of ‘We the People’ in numerous referendums and centuries of traditions and hundreds of state and federal laws, so that they could manufacture non-existent rights to abortion and deviant, perverse homosexual “marriage” [coupling], rights that cannot and never will be found in Madison’s Constitution.

 

Judges and justices are not empowered by the Constitution to make U.S. law or govern the nation. Those duties fall solely to Congress and the President.

 

Pat Buchanan observed on February 10th that President Andrew Jackson defied Chief Justice John Marshall’s “prohibition” against moving the Cherokee Indians across the Mississippi and to the western frontier. He also noted President Lincoln considered sending U.S. troops to arrest Chief Justice Roger Taney, when Taney declared Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional.

 

President Trump must simply defy U.S. District Judge Robart’s overly broad and illegal restraining order, upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal. He must order Homeland Security and his State Department and Justice Department to continue executing his executive order which is in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and existing law, because his act is a rare and righteous moment in this war against terrorism, the Islamofascists, the Radical Left of America and the International Communists, who seek our demise. And a Constitutional crisis is much preferred over more murdered innocent Americans.

 

By Justin O. Smith

_____________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets and source links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

On Defining Religion


nonie-darwish-2-i-will-not-submit

Ex-Muslim Nonie Darwish explains the reasons that Islam has absolutely NO harmony with the Western perception of values and religious freedom. The last sentence of this essay Darwish asks:

 

Is the First Amendment a suicide pact?

 

JRH 2/13/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

On Defining Religion

 

By Nonie Darwish

February 12, 2017 5:00 am

Gatestone Institute

 

  • What the West does not understand is that Islam admits that government control is central to Islam and that Muslims must, sooner or later, demand to live under an Islamic government.

 

  • The majority of the world does not understand that much of the American media is in a propaganda war against the Trump administration simply because he names Islamic jihad and would prefer to see a strong and prosperous America as a world leader rather than to see a dictatorship — secular or theocratic — as a world leader.

 

  • Islam claims to be an Abrahamic religion, but in fact Islam came to the world 600 years after Christ, not to affirm the Bible but to discredit it; not to co-exist with “the people of the book” — Jews and Christians — but to replace them, after accusing them of intentionally falsifying the Bible.

 

  • Islam was created as a rebellion against the Bible and its values, and it relies on government enforcement to do so.

 

  • Political and legal (sharia) Islam is much more than a religion. Is the First Amendment a suicide pact?

 

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) said that President Donald Trump’s 90-day ban on immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries is “a religiously based ban,” and “if they can ban Muslims, why can’t they ban Mormons.” This has become the position of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, which has influenced not only the American public but has convinced the majority of the world that America is “bad.” How can we blame the world, and even a good segment of American citizens, for hating America when such disingenuous and misleading claims are aired to the world from US officials and broadcast by American television channels?

 

The majority of the world does not understand that much of the American media is in a propaganda war against the Trump Administration simply because he names Islamic jihad and would prefer to see a strong and prosperous America as a world leader, rather than to see a dictatorship — secular or theocratic — as a world leader. He ran as a Republican; meanwhile, Democrats and the mainstream media refuse to engage in respectful and legitimate debate on the most vital threat to Western civilization in the twenty-first century: Islam. Truth has become irrelevant; people seem to prefer a political game of tug-of-war to sway public opinion against the Trump Administration, and, presumably, to elect Democrats forever. That is how the system is set up.

 

Political discussions on television have become extremely frustrating; they have turned into shouting matches and name-calling at the least informative levels. Television hosts often become instigators and participants in the shouting matches. The thinking is apparently that the louder they get, the more attractive the program will be. Meanwhile everyone is talking at once; the viewer cannot hear anyone, so the program could not be more boring.

 

Under the US Constitution, freedom of religion is protected. and Islam has been welcomed inside the West on that basis as one of the three Abrahamic religions. According to Western values and the Western understanding of the word, “religion” is supposed to be a personal relationship with God, where free will is of utmost importance; the believer has authority only over himself or herself when it comes to religious laws or punishing sins (such as leaving the religion or committing adultery) — quite different from criminal laws intended to protect society. Western values also allow followers of a religion the freedom to proselytize, but never by resorting to government enforcement.

 

Bottom line, the Western definition of religion is in harmony with the Biblical values of the human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that all human beings are created equal under the law. It is considered a basic Western value to view God, family and country as a top priority.

 

Now let us compare these values to Islamic values:

 

  • Muslim citizens have the right to punish other citizens with humiliating, severe, cruel and unusual punishments such as death, flogging and amputation, for sinning against Allah, the Quran or Islam. Those “crimes” include leaving Islam, being a homosexual, or committing adultery. And if the Islamic government does not enforce such punishments, any Muslim on the street has the right to apply the punishment against another Muslim and not be prosecuted. That is why apostates, such as myself, cannot visit any Muslim county; the fear is not only from Islamic governments but from anyone on the street.

 

  • Being a Muslim is not a personal relationship with God, as it is under the Bible, but is enforced by the state at birth. When a child is born in Egypt to a Muslim father, the birth certificate is stamped “Muslim” and all government-issued documents as well. A child must learn Islamic studies in school and practice Islam throughout his life. In Egypt, the twin sons of a Christian divorced mother were forced to take Islamic studies and become Muslim just because their originally-Christian father converted to Islam. Today, in Egypt, I am still considered Muslim and such a status could never change if I ever lived there again.

 

  • Islamic law and leaders rely on government enforcement — under penalty of death — to keep Muslims within Islam and to convert the minority Christian population into Islam. Islamic sharia law, obliges Islamic states to enforce religious law, and if the Muslim head of state refuses to follow religious law, sharia permits the public to use force to remove the head of state from office.

 

  • Islam claims to be an Abrahamic religion, but in fact Islam came to the world 600 years after Christ, not to affirm the Bible but to discredit it; not to co-exist with “the people of the book,” Jews and Christians, but to replace them — after accusing them of intentionally falsifying the Bible. Islam was created as a rebellion against the Bible and its values, and relies on government enforcement to do so.

 

The tenets above are just a few of the differences in values between Islam, the Bible and the Western concept of religion. What the West does not understand is that Islam admits that government control is central to Islam, and Muslims must demand to live under an Islamic government sooner or later. That might explain the reason for the eternal violence in nearly all Muslim countries, between government being in the hands of a religious theocracy or of the military. Islam, as it is practiced today, has violated all Western definitions of religion and values.

 

Political and legal (sharia) Islam is much more than a religion. Is the First Amendment a suicide pact?

 

THE FIRST AMENDMENT

1st-amendment-image-source-brent-payne-flickr

 

___________________

Nonie Darwish, born and raised in Egypt, is the author of “Wholly Different; Why I chose Biblical Values over Islamic Values.”

 

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. [Blog Editor: I did not ask for permission to re-blog this essay from the Gatestone Institute. If requested I will remove the post.]

 

About Gatestone Institute

 

“Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.” — John Adams

 

Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank is dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report in promoting:

 

  • Institutions of Democracy and the Rule of Law;

 

  • Human Rights

 

  • A free and strong economy

 

  • A military capable of ensuring peace at home and in the free world

 

  • Energy independence

 

  • Ensuring the public stay informed of threats to our individual liberty, sovereignty and free speech.

 

Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts — analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.

 

Gatestone Institute will be publishing books, and continues to publish an online daily report, www.gatestoneinstitute.org, that features topics such as military and diplomatic threats to the United States and our allies; events in the Middle East and READ THE REST

 

Understanding The Communist Role In Driving The Current Chaos In America


Dee Fatouros provides an intro to some G. Edward Griffin info on Communism in America pointing out the similarities of the present to the Marxist agenda of the past. Look at today’s street chaos and the obstructionism of the Dems in Congress.

 

There is an hour and fifteen-minute video seminar conducted by Griffin in 1968 at the end. I mention this because you will notice a portion of the monologue would be politically incorrect today. AND YET a very informative seminar.

 

g-edward-griffin-1968

Edward Griffin 1969

g-edward-griffin

Edward Griffin present day

 

 

 

JRH 2/12/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Understanding The Communist Role In Driving The Current Chaos In America

 

lenin-communist-america Lenin-Communist Revolution

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros

By G. Edward Griffin

February 11, 2017 10:12:00 AM

The Realistic Observer

 

A fairly brief, but most informative read. I’m sure the reader will recognize much of what is being said as occurring today, class warfare, racial strife, big government, disinformation, (fake news), “protests” etc.

Like Jihad, Communism has its stages and its soldiers. The CPUSA is quite powerful in America and many members of Congress are followers. They are but one of the more effective occupants in the toolbox of the globalist drive for world domination. Many see Globalism as rebranded Communism, and indeed, there are undeniable similarities, but that is another discussion. The end game by any other name is world domination, loss of national sovereignty, and world wide totalitarian oppression of the world citizenry.

At the end of this write up is a video (made in 1969) discussing Communism in America, and its approach to fomenting internal revolution.  It is prescient, an hour long, but can be listened to. By the way, this video was made when Blacks were politically correctly referred to as Negros. Do not be offended.

At 21 minutes into it, he discusses African American Manning Johnson’s awakening as to the true motives of the using Black Americans as cannon fodder for the beginning revolution which resulted in his leaving the Communist Party.

Johnson wrote an insightful book, “Color Communism And Common Sense”, in 1935 in which he exposed the truth of the Communist purported “concern” for the American Negro and its attempted manipulation of them into becoming the spearhead of the  revolution in America. He also discussed the created racial divide and its intended purpose. This book is as pertinent today as was in 1935.

 

“Color Communism And Common Sense”.


Contents 

Preface by ARCHIBALD B. ROOSEVELT
I In the Web
II Subverting Negro Churches 
III Red Plot to Use Negroes 
IV Bane of Red Integration 
V Destroying the Opposition 
VI The Real “Uncle Toms” 
VII Creating Hate 
VIII Modern Day Carpet Baggers 
IX Race Pride Is Passé 
X Wisdom Needed
 

Appendices

 

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE PLANNED U.S. CIVIL WAR
by G. Edward Griffin

 

This week’s news is dominated, once again, with reports of violent demonstrations against the Trump administration. We have seen violent demonstrations before, but something new has been added that is profoundly significant. It is the rhetoric of civil war and revolution. 

The organizations spouting civil-war rhetoric are following a playbook taken from the writings of Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Communist Party. It is a rhetoric that demonizes all enemies as ‘capitalist exploiters’ (in America, where there still is a latent affinity to capitalism, the word ‘Fascism’ is preferred.) and calls for an overthrow of the government. Followers are not supposed to think about what would replace it but, for those who are curious, the answer is a ‘socialist’ government responsive, not to big business, but to the people. 


You may think that, boisterous as these demonstrators are, and although they can draw a few thousand youngsters to their events, they are but a tiny fraction of the population and could never pose a serious threat to any government. But how wrong you would be. 


Major political changes always are achieved by minorities. All revolutions are the work of less than three percent of the population, and the American Revolution was no exception. It’s not how many people there are, but how well organized they are and where they are. If the three percenters are influential in a nation’s power centers (political parties, government agencies, courts, military, schools, activist groups, labor unions, etc.), then the odds are in their favor. The masses will follow the winners. 


When you look at the rag-tag bunch carrying placards and shouting obscenities, you may be comforted thinking that they have no influence in the real power centers, but be mindful that street theater is only half the picture. Classic communist strategy involves, not one, but two types of revolution. The first is by force and violence (they call it a war of national liberation), but the other is political and peaceful (what they call a proletarian revolution). 


The two are designed to work together, one from the bottom (masses in the streets) and the other from the top (agents inside government waiting for an excuse to introduce legislation that will move the nation closer to the Leninist ideal. The strategy is, not to conquer in one fell swoop, but to do so by a series of steps, each one seen by the public as a necessary compromise to end the violence. 


In 1969, I delivered a lecture on this subject, entitled More Deadly than War. That was in the day when I was hanging out at the communist book store in Los Angeles doing research on collectivism, so I was loaded with communist publications to illustrate my message. The presentation was recorded on black-and-white film, released in VHS format, and then forgotten. Someone put it on YouTube about five years ago so, when we created our Reality Zone YouTube channel last year, we copied it to that collection. 


It has been almost fifty years since I gave much thought to that lecture so, when I started to write this commentary, I decided to watch it again to see what I said. Frankly, I was blown away by how every point applies directly to what is happening today.


If you are interested in my analysis, here is the link. (video below)

 

VIDEO: More Deadly Than War – A Lecture by G. Edward Griffin [1:14:36]

 

Posted by Reality Zone

Published on Oct 8, 2016 

 

…The Blueprint for Revolution in America….

This address by G. Edward Griffin, given in 1968, is as current as today’s headlines. Mr. Griffin shows that the Leninist strategy for conquest involves two kinds of revolution: One is violent; the other is non-violent.

While most people think only of violent revolution, the non-violent phase is where most of the action has been in the United States. Leninists call it the Proletarian Revolution and it involves the gradual transition to Marxism (which is merely one form of collectivism) by use of the ballot box. Control is achieved through economic pressures rather than guns and executions.

This program shows how Leninists utilize mass-membership organizations, politicians, and the parliamentary process to bring about totalitarianism with little opposition from those who are being subjugated.

For more information, visit http://www.realityzone.com

 

___________

EDWARD GRIFFIN – Non-Real Observer Bio

 

EDWARD GRIFFINis a writer, documentary film producer, and Founder of Freedom Force International. Listed in Who’s Who in America, he is well known because of his talent for researching difficult topics and presenting them in clear terms that all can understand.

 

He has dealt with such diverse subjects as archaeology and ancient Earth history, the Federal Reserve System and international banking, terrorism, internal subversion, the history of taxation, U.S. foreign policy, the science and politics of cancer therapy, the Supreme Court, and the United Nations.

 

His better-known works include The Creature from Jekyll Island, World without Cancer, The Discovery of Noah’s Ark, Moles in High Places, The Open Gates of Troy, No Place to Hide, The Capitalist Conspiracy, More Deadly than War, The Grand Design, The Great Prison Break, and The Fearful Master

 

Ed is a graduate of the University of Michigan where he majored in speech and communications. He is …  READ ENTIRETY

 

9th Circuit Uses Semantics to Deceive Americans


e-pluribus-unum-vs-multiculturalist-left

When the 9th Circuit Appeals Court upheld a Lower Court stay on President Trump’s Executive Order temporarily banning citizens, refugees, and immigrants from seven nations that are hotbeds of Islamic terrorism, it demonstrated how Leftist Activist Judges ignore the Constitution in favor of Leftist utopianism. The American Left might as rip up the Constitution and burn the scraps of paper.

 

Paul Sutliff demonstrates how the 9th circuit is torching the U.S. Constitution with misinformation to justify Multiculturalist utopian goals.

 

JRH 2/11/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

9th Circuit Uses Semantics to Deceive Americans

u-s-9th-circuit-deceives-american 

By Paul Sutliff 

February 9, 2017

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

 

The New York Post wrote an article on February 9th that clearly shows the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, carefully choosing words for the purpose of creating misinformation for the media to share with their readers and viewers regarding their actions against President Trump’s Executive Order. According to that article the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stated:

“The Government has pointed to no evidence that an alien of the countries named in the Order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States,” the three-member panel wrote.”

 

The terminology “perpetrated a terrorist attack” explicitly excludes all actions prevented or attempted that did not result in a terror attack. Why is this important? There are at least 38 terrorists who were killed or arrested as they worked to be supportive of the Islamic State AND who were also classified as immigrants/refugees at one time. In addition, there are at least 6 persons who were killed or arrested for attempting an act of terror who were second generation Americans refugees. I filed this information in a federally filed affidavit in September 2016 as an Expert Witness. You will notice people from countries other than the seven countries listed in Trump’s ban.

All the information in the graphs below originated in the Threat Knowledge Group last accessed in September 2016, whose site was disabled recently with President Trump’s appointment of Sebastian Gorka, with the exception of the information in the last column which I found. Actual sources for the information cited in the last column is provided in my Affidavit.

 

APPENDIX C 1

 is-terrorists-arrested-were-refugees

 

APPENDIX C 2

is-terrorists-arrested-were-refugees-2 

 

APPENDIX C 3

is-terrorists-arrested-were-refugees-3 

 

APPENDIX C 4

 is-terrorists-arrested-were-refugees-4

 

APPENDIX C 5

is-terrorists-arrested-were-refugees-5

 

____________________

Paul Sutliff

 

I am writer and a teacher. Here is a link to my publisher and my latest book portraying the truth about Civilization Jiihad! https://www.tatepublishing.com/bookstore/book.php?w=978-1-68237-562-4