Tucker Carlson Nails It! All You Need to Know About GOP Governors Who Turned on Trump!


Ann Corcoran endorses Tucker Carlson’s 1/3/20 broadcast as an expose of treasonous GOP Governors welcoming American-hating Muslim refugees. BUT Tucker begins with speaking of American enemy Iranian general Qasem Soleimani being killed by an American air strike.

 

Tucker doesn’t question that Soleimani was an evil Islamic terrorist, but openly wonders if Iranian retaliation will lead to open war between the USA and Iran. I for one am weary of American invasions; HOWEVER I am all in to bomb the crap out of anything that provides an economic/military benefit for the Iranian regime. Take out oil, nuclear and military capacities with American technology less soldiers’ boots. AND keep on crippling the regime until a surrender or collapse.

 

The GOP Governors ignoring a majority of American wishes on refugees while siding with Dem Multiculturalists begins at about the 30 minute mark of a 39:33 length video. EIGHTEEN GOP Governors giving go ahead for American-hating Muslim Refugees in so-called Christian Charities are making a buck.

 

Other topics: China, 2nd Amendment stops Church shooting in Texas, Homelessness in San Francisco and Boeing financial woes.

 

JRH 1/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

Tucker Carlson Nails It! All You Need to Know About GOP Governors Who Turned on Trump!

 

By Ann Corcoran

1/4/2020

Frauds, Crooks and Criminals

 

In just a little over 5 minutes last night Tucker Carlson in a segment on the US Refugee Admissions Program and the President’s efforts to reform it, explains exactly what we have been saying for weeks in dozens of posts.

 

Especially interesting is the focus on phony Christian charity as Carlson’s millions of viewers learn that it is federal contractors masquerading as charitable religious groups that have successfully lobbied Republican governors—18 so far—to thumb their noses at Trump and ask for more refugees for their states!

 

It is vitally important that you send this far and wide. Hat tip: Brenda.

 

The segment begins here:

 

VIDEO: Tucker Carlson Tonight 1/3/20 FULL | Tucker Carlson Fox News January 3, 2020 [GOP Governor/Muslim Refugee segment begins about 30 minute mark]

 

 

[Posted by valdilene pessoa

44.2K subscribers – Jan 3, 2020]

 

Don’t miss my post yesterday about CAIR sending wet kisses to Maryland Governor Larry Hogan when he became the 18th governor to say his state welcomes more poverty from the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

+++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________

About Frauds, Crooks and Criminals

 

During the next two years Americans will be bombarded by the media with news about the joys of diversity and the economic boom ‘New Americans’ are bringing to the US.

 

However, it’s important that the voting public sees the full picture.

 

Yes, there are deserving immigrants arriving in America, and then there are those who are frauds, crooks and criminals.

 

And, of course, there are American criminals as well.

 

I’ll mention some of those too. In fact, I will have to because most law enforcement and the media rarely report the immigration status of crooks and criminals!

 

Ann Corcoran

 

The Unacceptable Cost of Refugee Resettlement


Justin Smith tackles the issue of settling refugees from cultures that have zero allegiance to American culture and heritage and idiocy of the American Left complicit in destroying our American heritage. Essentially making the Many eradicate the One – ending E Pluribus Unum.

JRH 12/31/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

******************************

The Unacceptable Cost of Refugee Resettlement

Refugee Resettlement Is Not America’s Obligation 

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 12/28/2019 8:19 PM

 

Americans absolutely have the right to determine who, if anyone, enters the country, and it doesn’t violate any law or the Constitution to reject anyone claiming refugee status. So-called refugees do not have any automatic right to be granted entry, despite many leftist assertions to the contrary, and many of us are sick and tired of hearing our leaders’ cliched platitudes that suggest they have a “Big Heart”, much like Governor Bill Lee (R-TN), while they allow people into the country, who come to America to avoid fighting for their own countries; and, usually, of late, these refugees hold ideas and views so anti-American and so antithetical to the Constitution, that they eventually become a great disruptive factor to any community, as they work to undermine the nation.

 

On December 18th 2019, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee announced his decision to send a letter of consent to the Trump administration, in order to accept more refugees for resettlement next year. His decision coincides with those of other Republican governors who have also stated their intent to admit more refugees, such as Kim Reynolds of Iowa, Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas, Doug Ducey of Arizona, Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma, Gary Herbert of Utah and Doug Burgum of North Dakota.

 

And of course, numerous Democratic led states, such as California, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, Virginia and others have already submitted letters of consent or are making preparations to do so. According to U.S. State Department arrival records, resettlement has occurred in the District of Columbia, every U.S. territory and state since 2003.

 

The state of Tennessee still has a high-profile Tenth Amendment lawsuit in the works, that Governor Lee has essentially undermined through his consent letter, effectively infuriating legislative leaders who had sued the federal government. The lawsuit questions the constitutionality of the refugee resettlement program.

 

House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt Governor Randy McNally (TN) issued a joint statement: “Our personal preference would have been to exercise the option to hit the pause button on accepting additional refugees in our state.”

 

While more than a third of Tennessee’s 95 counties are preparing to challenge any refugee resettlement, so too are other counties around America, from North Dakota to Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Indiana to Vermont, New Hampshire and Wyoming. Burleigh County North Dakota heard its chairman, Brian Bitner, voice citizens’ concerns, stating: “North Dakota is already the highest per capita state for refugee resettlement in terms of number of citizens, so in the absence of any sort of number, there’s no way we could know the cost to the state or the county, and I simply can’t support that.”

 

President Trump signed an executive order that allowed all fifty states to decide whether to accept refugees or not, in September of this year, and it requires a written letter of consent. This isn’t any guarantee that refugees won’t settle in an area that initially rejected the refugee resettlement program, since they can travel from state to state and county to county; and regardless of this, many Americans simply don’t want any more anti-American refugees, such as Somalia born Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN), or Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — American born but raised to hate America by her “palestinian” Muslim mother, given entry to our nation, since they sound and act more like agents of Hamas, the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Hezbollah and Al Shabaab than someone interested in keeping America strong and free.

 

On August 26th 2019, Representative Ilhan Omar called for the government of Somalia to protect Hormuud Telecom Company, from United Nation peace-keepers, even though HTC has been financing the Al Shabaab terrorist organization for years. This link between Hormuud and Al Shabaab is well documented in the October 19th 2019 report compiled by the International Policy Group, entitled ‘Reaping the Whirlwind — Hormuud Entrepreneurs and the Resurgence of Al Shabaab’.

 

One should note that 45 Somali Muslims left their homes in Minneapolis to join the Somali based Al Shabaab Islamic terror group or ISIS, in 2007, as documented by FBI statistics. And as of 2018, a dozen more were arrested as they attempted to leave the U.S. for their expressed purpose of fighting for ISIS.

 

According to Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project, Representative Rashida Tlaib was photographed, in January 2019, with Abbas Hamideh, a Hezbollah supporter, and again in March with Nader Jalajel, a Palestinian activist who mourned the death of a Palestinian terrorist who had murdered a Jewish rabbi the previous year.

 

America has far too many natural born citizens who seemingly hate Her to be bringing in foreign nationals who hate America too, doesn’t She?

 

Refugees come from many countries across the globe, fleeing specific danger in their homelands, although the bulk of refugees have been from Iraq, Syria and Somalia since 2015; and a large number is comprised of people who simply wouldn’t fight for their war-torn countries. They come here too often simply from necessity, in their eyes, and safety, and not out of any sense of kindred spirit or love for the American way of life, our freedom and our liberty. And so, they set about life in their own tradition, with the same associated flaws that created the troubles in their country, regardless of its unseemly and foreign nature and cloistered within an American community.

 

Americans don’t want to see their neighborhoods permanently transformed into United Nations refugee camps filled with welfare dependents, as they now find in Minneapolis where the crime rate has soared exponentially, largely due to the rapid and massive influx of Somali Muslim refugees. According to Steven Camarota‘s 2015 study (The High Cost of Resettling {Muslim} Middle Eastern Refugees), it costs taxpayers $64,370 for each Muslim refugee, which is twelve times UN estimates to care for one refugee in surrounding Middle Eastern nations. Even worse, the crime rate rose by fifty-six percent in Minneapolis, between 2010 and 2018, due to criminal activity by Somali Muslim gangs.

 

For God’s sake, what is wrong with being a bit more discerning in regards of the refugees America accepts? Why can’t we accept more like Ayn Rand, staunch anti-communist defender of liberty, Dith Pran, Pulitzer prize winning photo-journalist and translator for U.S. Military Assistance Command (Cambodia) and Albert Einstein, a genius physicist and Nobel Laureate?

 

The United States granted an astronomical number of asylum requests in September 2019 to a combined 70,246 Afghan refugees and Special Immigration Visas (Afghan “allies”) and 161,665 Iraqi refugees and SIVs. The war in Iraq ended in 2011, so there really isn’t any excuse for U.S. taxpayers to be funding new lives in America for anyone from Iraq, other than the truly persecuted Christians who are still trapped in the region.

 

America spent enormous sums of money and lost thousands of fine men and women to give Iraqis a better path forward and a new chance to govern themselves as free men and women. Is there any good reason that justifies moving tens of thousands of Iraqis, or Syrians or Somalians for that matter, to any American town?

 

President Trump is only willing to give 18,000 refugees entry to America this year, which is the lowest number authorized since the program’s inception in 1980. In contrast, President Barack Obama was willing to accept 110,000 refugees in 2017.

 

Amid the current anti-open borders sentiment in America, the open borders crowd, the Leftists of America always seem to manage to move U.S. policy in the opposite direction, just as they are currently attempting through a lawsuit filed against President Trump’s executive order on November 21st 2019. Although public support for deceasing the numbers of legal immigration of all kinds is significant, the supporters are not well organized, unlike the Leftist coalition of ethnic churches and organizations that skillfully navigates the political arena in strong opposition to any proposal restricting any segment of legal immigration, including asylum seekers.

 

The lawsuit was filed in a Maryland federal court by lawyers representing the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and Church World Service. Shortly afterwards, Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president of LIRS, stated: “This executive order is unconstitutional and compassionless, and reflects a complete misunderstanding of the refugee resettlement process in this country.”

 

Over the past decade, Ann Corcoran, a refugee law and policy expert, has given America outstanding briefings on the issue. She outlines in great detail the ultimate conflict of interest, by which refugee contractors’ entire budgets grow commensurate to the number of refugees they resettle. The more communities they get on board with refugee resettlement, the more money they receive, and so their is nearly a knock down dragged out fight over all 3007 counties across America, with the goal of moving them to send letters of consent to the State Department.

 

Unbelievable as it seems, most Republican politicians are somewhat amenable to the one-sided pressure for all the wrong reasons, and in some cases, they [Blog Editor: i.e. (alleged) Conservative] are absolutely in the pockets of Open Borders Inc. And although conservatives have ceded a great deal of America to the Left, the refugee coalition has not ceded a single county; and so, thanks to many complacent and corrupt GOP politicians, refugee resettlement has thrived in the most conservative areas of the nation. The financial and cultural costs of refugee resettlement have been unacceptable and enormous.

 

On July 5th 2017, a report, entitled ‘The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program: A Roadmap for Reform’, written by policy analyst David Inserra noted that at least sixty-one people who came to the United States as refugees engaged in terrorist activities between 2002 and 2016. The report detailed scores of other refugees who lied or took part in terror plots, as part of a study aimed at reforming the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. The report concluded there was a need to place strict limits on refugee numbers and restrictions on the refugees themselves.

 

Surely every knowledgeable American understands full well that there isn’t any universal right to migrate, and resettlement isn’t the solution to mass displacement. Our policymakers have a duty and a responsibility to make certain our nation only accepts as many refugees as can be safely scrutinized, investigated and assimilated. More importantly, America is not obligated to resettle refugees, and the ones we do resettle, America does so from a humane perspective and in hopes that such actions will also benefit our national interests.

 

So, to all the naive shmucks and corrupt, complicit liars out in Fly-Over-Country, who are playing a dangerous game with American lives, place your “Big Heart” on full display, but ignoring a moral and constitutional duty to place American interests and American lives above those of foreign nationals’ needs is unconscionable and treasonous, at its best. Pressure Saudi Arabia, the United Emirates and Qatar to utilize their millions of dollars to resettle Muslim refugees in their own nations, as America works to facilitate the integration and assimilation of refugees it already has accepted, if and when such a feat is possible.  Don’t let your “Big Heart” drive all common sense from between your ears, while your platitudes set the further destruction of America in motion, since the perpetrators of future Islamic terror attacks are already here: And as such, America would be most wise to, at the very least, halt any more Muslims from coming to America.

 

By Justin O. Smith

++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

UN, UK Treating Persecuted Christians as “Enemies”


How long will Christians in America and however many Christians left in Multiculturalist Europe remain silent as Christians are exterminated in Muslim dominated lands AND the same persecuted Christians refused asylum in a safer (BUT not safe as long as there is Muslim influence) West? EVEN the Western Press ignores persecuted Christians as one has to go to alternative news sources to learn the UN and UK dominated by intolerant Islamic influences goes along with exterminating Christianity.

 

JRH 12/26/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

****************************

UN, UK Treating Persecuted Christians as “Enemies”

 

By  Raymond Ibrahim

12/26/2019

Originally posted at Gatestone Institute

RaymondIbrahim.com

 

Ibrahim photo – gbm

 

The United Nations Refugee Agency appears to be committed to blocking persecuted Christians from receiving any assistance.  According to a recent CBN News report:

 

Christian Syrian refugees … have been blocked from getting help from the United Nations Refugee Agency, the UNHCR, by Muslim UN officials in Jordan.

 

One of the refugees, Hasan, a Syrian convert to Christianity, told us in a phone call that Muslim UN camp officials “knew that we were Muslims and became Christians and they dealt with us with persecution and mockery. They didn’t let us into the office. They ignored our request.”

 

Hasan and his family are now in hiding, afraid that they will be arrested by Jordanian police, or even killed. Converting to Christianity is a serious crime in Jordan.

 

According to Timothy, a Jordanian Muslim who converted to Christianity, “All of the United Nations officials [apparently in Jordan], most of them, 99 percent, they are Muslims, and they were treating us as enemies.”

 

Addressing this issue, Paul Diamond, a British human rights lawyer, recently elaborated:

 

You have this absurd situation where the scheme is set up to help Syrian refugees and the people most in need, Christians who have been “genocided,” they can’t even get into the U.N. camps to get the food. If you enter and say I am a Christian or convert, the Muslim U.N. guards will block you [from] getting in and laugh at you and mock you and even threaten you…. [saying]  “You shouldn’t have converted. You’re an idiot for converting. You get what you get,” words to that effect.

 

The next obstacle those few Christians who make it past U.N. refugee camps face are the immigration centers of Western nations themselves.  For example, the discrimination is apparently so obvious in the United Kingdom that Lord George Carey is suing the U.K.’s Home Office for allegedly being “institutionally biased” against Christian refugees and therefore complicit in what he calls “the steady crucifixion of Middle East Christians.”

 

He is hardly the only one making such charges.  One independent report said that when it comes to offering asylum, the UK “appears to discriminate in favour of Muslims” instead of Christians. Statistics seemed to confirm this allegation:  “out of 4,850 Syrian refugees accepted for resettlement by the Home Office in 2017, only eleven were Christian, representing just 0.2% of all Syrian refugees accepted by the UK.”

 

Due to such figures, Lord David Alton of Liverpool, a life peer in the House of Lords, wrote to Home Secretary Sajid Javid, who then headed the Home Office:

 

It is widely accepted that Christians, who constituted around 10 per cent of Syria’s pre-war population, were specifically targeted by jihadi rebels and continue to be at risk….  As last year’s statistics more than amply demonstrate, this [ratio imbalance between Muslim and Christian refugees taken in] is not a statistical blip. It shows a pattern of discrimination that the Government has a legal duty to take concrete steps to address.

 

Such imbalances appear even stranger on the realization that the Islamic State, which precipitated the refugee crisis, is itself a Sunni organization that only targets non-Sunnis—primarily Christians, Yazidis, and Shia—all minority groups that the U.S. has acknowledged experienced a “genocide.”

 

Two of the strangest individual cases of anti-Christian bias were reported earlier this year, when the U.K. denied asylum to persecuted Christians by bizarrely citing the Bible and Islam.  Both Christians, a man and a woman, were former Muslims separately seeking asylum from the Islamic Republic of Iran, the ninth worst persecutor of Christians, particularly former Muslims.

 

In his rejection letter from the UK’s Home Office, the Iranian man was told that several biblical passages were “inconsistent” with his claim to have converted to Christianity after discovering it was a “peaceful” faith.  The letter cited biblical excerpts—including from Exodus, Leviticus, and Matthew—as supposed proof that the Bible is violent; it said Revelation was “filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence.”  The rejection letter then concluded: “These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a ‘peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge.”

 

In the second case, an Iranian female asylum seeker was sarcastically informed in her rejection letter that “You affirmed in your AIR [Asylum Interview Record] that Jesus is your saviour, but then claimed that He would not be able to save you from the Iranian regime. It is therefore considered that you have no conviction in your faith and your belief in Jesus is half-hearted.”

 

Discussing her experiences, the rejected woman said: “When I was in Iran I converted to Christianity and the situation changed and the government were [sic] looking for me and I had to flee from Iran….  In my country if someone converts to Christianity their punishment is death or execution.”  Concerning the asylum process, she said that whenever she responded to her Home Office interviewer, “he was either chuckling or maybe just kind of mocking when he was talking to me….  [H]e asked me why Jesus didn’t help you from the Iranian regime or Iranian authorities.”

 

Similarly, when Sister Ban Madleen, a Christian nun who was chased out of Iraq by the Islamic State, wanted to visit her sick sister in the U.K., she was denied a visa—twice.  A number of other Christian orderlies were also denied visas, including another nun with a PhD in Biblical Theology from Oxford; another nun denied for not having a personal bank account; and a Catholic priest denied for not being married.

 

In another case, Britain’s Home Office not only denied entry to three Christian leaders—archbishops celebrated for their heroic efforts to aid persecuted Christians in Syria and Iraq who had been invited to attend the consecration of the U.K.’s first Syriac Cathedral, an event attended by Prince Charles—but also mockingly told them there was “no room at the inn.”

 

Considering that persecuted Christian minorities—including priests and nuns—are denied visas, one may conclude that the Home Office is extremely stringent concerning its asylum requirements.  However, this notion is quickly dispelled on the realization that the Home Office regularly grants visas and refugee status to extremist Muslims (not to mention one has yet to hear about Muslim asylum seekers being denied because the Koran is too violent, or because they do not have enough faith in Muhammad).

 

For example,  despite having no papers on him—and despite telling the Home Office that “he had been trained as an ISIS soldier”—Ahmed Hassan was still granted asylum two years before he launched a terrorist attack on a London train station that left 30 injured in September 2017.  The Home Office also allowed a foreign Muslim cleric to enter and lecture in London, even though he advocates decapitating, burning, and/or throwing homosexuals from cliffs.  According to another report, “British teenagers are being forced to marry abroad and are raped and impregnated while the Home Office ‘turns a blind eye’ by handing visas to their [mostly Muslim] husbands.”

 

The case of Asia Bibi—a Christian wife and mother of five who spent the last decade of her life on death row in Pakistan for challenging the authority of Muhammad—best sheds light on the immigration situation in the UK.  After she was finally acquitted in November, 2018, Muslims rioted throughout Pakistan; in one march, more than 11,000 Muslims demanded her instant and public hanging.

 

As Pakistanis make for the majority of the U.K.’s significant Muslim population—Sajid Javid, then head of the Home Office, is himself Pakistani—when they got wind that the U.K. might offer Asia Bibi asylum, they too rioted.   As a result, then Prime Minister Theresa May personally blocked Bibi’s asylum application, “despite UK playing host to [Muslim] hijackers, extremists and rapists,” to quote from one headline.  In other words, Britain was openly allowing “asylum policy to be dictated to by a Pakistan mob,” reported the Guardian, “after it was confirmed it urged the Home Office not to grant Asia Bibi political asylum in the UK…”

 

On the other hand, the Home Office allowed a Pakistani cleric who celebrated the slaughter of a politician because he had defended Asia Bibi—a cleric deemed so extreme as to be banned from his native Pakistan—to enter and lecture in U.K. mosques.

 

Discussing how “visas were granted [by the Home Office] in July [2016] to two Pakistani Islamic leaders who have called for the killing of Christians accused of blasphemy,” Dr. Martin Parsons, a human rights activist, expressed his frustration: “It’s unbelievable that these persecuted Christians who come from the cradle of Christianity are being told there is no room at the inn, when the UK is offering a welcome to Islamists who persecute Christians.”

 

In short, Muslim influence against Christians is not only at work in U.N. refugee camps, as recent evidence indicates, but in the U.K’s immigration policy as well: Christian “infidels” need not apply, whereas radical Muslims are welcomed with open arms.

++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________________

© 2019 · RaymondIbrahim.com

 

About Raymond Ibrahim

 

RAYMOND IBRAHIM is a widely published author, public speaker, and Middle East and Islam specialist.  His books include Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013), and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).

 

 

Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East—has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former. His interest in Islamic civilization was first piqued when he began visiting the Middle East as a child in the 1970s. Interacting and conversing with the locals throughout the decades has provided him with an intimate appreciation for that part of the world, complementing his academic training.

 

After a brief athletic career—including winning the 1993 NPC Los Angeles Bodybuilding Championship as a teenager—Raymond went on to receive his B.A. and M.A. (both in History, focusing on the ancient and medieval Near East, with dual-minors in Philosophy and Literature) from California State University, Fresno. There he studied closely with noted military-historian Victor Davis Hanson. He also took graduate courses at Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies—including classes on the history, politics, and economics of the Arab world—and studied Medieval Islam and Semitic languages at Catholic University of America. His M.A. thesis examined an early military encounter between Islam and Byzantium based on arcane Arabic and Greek texts.

 

READ ENTIRETY

 

Islam’s Final Objective


Justin Smith is from Tennessee making it understandable his concerns about the deceptive nature used by Muslims living in America creatively sanitizing Islam to be conducive to Founding American Principles and the influence of Christianity to America’s Founding. OF COURSE if anyone compares American historical documents from the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers promoting ratification of the U.S. Constitution TO THE Quran, Hadith, Sira AND Sharia and all documents/manuscripts pertaining to American history and Islamic history – you easily realize there is NO conducive COMPARE THERE.

 

Justin’s observations about Islam in Tennessee is an observation one could notice across every State in the Union.

 

(Side note: I’m not the only pebble on the beach with whom Justin share’s his thoughts. Notice he submitted this post to me on Friday 10/4/19. So you may have run into other versions on other website venues. I ran into a version I first discovered on a MeWe Social Group which linked to a 10/4 post at The Federal Observer under the title, “Muslim First, Last and Always: Islam’s Final Objective”. Justin typically offers titles to choose from which is the reason you may discover similar posts by Justin Smith at different venues. As you will notice I went with the combination of “Islam’s Final Objective – We Are Not America: We’re Muslim.”)

 

JRH 10/6/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**********************

Islam’s Final Objective 

We Are Not American: We’re Muslim

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/4/2019 5:15 PM – Last Update Sent 7:53 PM

 

I have always brought my children up [to] think of themselves first, last and always as Muslim.” ~ Sharifa Alkhateeb — August 5th 1989 Political Awareness Conference for Muslim Americans [Geller Report Transcription]

 

The first Muslim women, Zulfat Suara, elected in the state of Tennessee to any position, was recently sworn into her position on the Metro Nashville City Council, in September, and she took her oath on the Koran, as she was surrounded by her Muslim friends, Muslim apologists and the Democrat illiberal anti-American, anti-Christian supporters who celebrated her win with shouts of “Islam” from one woman heard in a video, one woman reciting a Muslim verse and a Muslim imam chanting an Islamic prayer. All of this belies Suara’s often stated contention that she will act for all her constituents, as an at-large Councilwoman, in a secular manner, without seeking to impose her Islamic ideology on others.

 

Zulfat Suara sworn in on Quran (via American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) press release)

 

[Blog Editor: Bare Naked Islam is often criticized for being too brash in its criticism of Islam. A 9/10/12 BNI post demonstrates how Sharia-supporting Muslims DECEIVE non-Muslim Americans with graphic illustrations of the negative aspects of Sharia that Muslims like Zulfat Suara will NOT tell you about AND probably even lie about the Sharia that every Constitution-adhering would condemn: TENNESSEE: Muslim hijabi running for office is an unapologetic supporter of sharia law, the antithesis of the U.S. Constitution; By BNI; Bare Naked Islam; 9/10/19. – At the end of the BNI post is a 3 minute & 55 second interview of Zulfat Suara effusing over how great Sharia is with text boxes popping into the video refuting Suara’s stand:

 

VIDEO: Nigerian immigrant Zulfat Suara becomes Tennessee’s first Muslim lawmaker

 

 

Posted by RAIR FOUNDATION USA

581 subscribers

August 19, 2019

 

https://rairfoundation.com/nigerian-immigrant-zulfat-suara-may-become-tennessees-first-muslim-lawmaker/

 

Update: One day after the 18th anniversary of 9/11, Sharia Activist, Zulfat Suara, became the 1st Muslim elected to Nashville city government.

 

Zulfat Suara was a candidate for Nashville Metro Council. After placing second among 15 candidates, Zulfat Suara proceeded to a runoff election for Nashville’s Metro Council. The runoff took place on September 12, 2019..

 

To learn more about Sharia: https://rairfoundation.com/nigerian-immigrant-zulfat-suara-may-become-tennessees-first-muslim-lawmaker/ [scroll down to heading “More on Sharia (Islamic Law) – If you liked Jim Crow, you’ll love Sharia

 

Please sign up and be part of our action organization at www.rairfoundation.com]

 

Noted by Cathy Hinners at the Daily Roll Call, the prayer is a verse recited by Muslims five times daily in the Al-Fatihah and it translates: “Please don’t let me be like the Christians or Jews“. One can only view such a prayer offered in any government building as the despicable and reprehensible act that it is, especially when one considers that America is actually historically and factually founded upon Christian and Western principles.

 

Facebook Video: Cathy Hinners – DO we not live in the Buckle of the Bible…

https://www.facebook.com/dailyroll.call.1/videos/2466665310230719/

 

At first glance and taken at face value, Suara does seem to represent a paradox, with a big smile and a hearty laugh, since she notes that her mother was a Christian and so too is her half-brother. But everyone who knows anything about Islam understands that whenever the father of a home is Muslim, Islam rules the household and those Christian principles are suppressed, discouraged, and silenced with constant demands they be abandoned.

 

However, one need not search too far to conclude that Zulfat Suara is far from the peaceful, secular Muslim she claims to be, whether viewed by her political activism in the American Muslim Advisory Committee [AMAC], which advocates for Sharia Law in America as evidenced in its opposition to bills that were passed in Tennessee demanding American law for American courts, or through her associates in the AMAC. One cannot ignore her glowing support of two of the most radical Muslim women in the nation either, as she profusely praised both Representative Rashida Tlaib and Rep. Ilhan Omar in a January 3rd 2019 online (Twitter) post, (DAILY ROLL CALL 3/2/2019 — Pat Hamsa) even though both of these Congresswomen are strong advocates [Rashida Tlaib & Ilhan Omar] for Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and Al Shabaab.

 

Even the appointment of Samar Ali to treasurer of Suara’s campaign belies Suara’s claims, since (as I wrote in ‘Islam: Death Cult’ September 2012) Ali interned for a bank in 2007 — the Islamic International Bank — which regularly financed Islamic terrorism and paid $5300 to “Palestinian” suicide bombers. Ali also founded the U.S delegation to the World Economic Forum in 2009, whose International Advisory Panel was at one time chaired by Saleh Abdullah Kamel, a “main sponsor of Al Qaeda” according to the UN Security Council.

 

As an undergraduate at Vanderbilt University, Ali stated, “I will always be Arab and I will always be American and I will always be Muslim.” However, as she grew professionally, her emphasis has been on being Muslim to the point of betraying America. And while many Americans have ancestors from overseas, we now see ourselves as simply American, as once noted by Lt Col Allen West who stated that he was purely and simply an “American” and not an “Afro-American”.

 

One of Suara’s associates on the board of the AMAC, Drost Kokoye, regularly and blatantly exhibits her own anti-American Islamic racism, asserting the Constitution “writes white supremacy into law“. She states that she is a Kurd and doesn’t like being called “an American“, and she has regularly met with Islamic imams, such as Zaid Shakir who stated in 2001 that Muslims could take over America quickly, if they were better organized [Page 10 of PDF]; Shakir added that “under Islamic law (the non-believers, Christians and Jews) won’t be equal with Muslims” (first reported by Investigative Project [I found at Clarion Project]). Kokoye also went on record in 2015 as an advocate of violent protest and riots, in order to achieve political goals [Canary Mission under heading “Promoting Violence”], which isn’t a surprising thing to see from any Muslim.

 

Under Suara’s influence, backed by the Nashville Post and Bill Freeman, black business leaders of the Nashville Business Alliance PAC and the Tennessee Immigration and Refugee Rights Coalition, Tennessean’s will see Islamic issues take front and center in Nashville, “Little Kurdistan”, and Suara and Kokoye will continue to undermine Western principles and the rule of law through the AMAC’s support of Muslim concerns and illegal immigrants in Nashville and elsewhere in Tennessee, essentially also rewarding the TIRRC for its support of Suara’s campaign.

 

It should be obvious to all that Suara isn’t honestly offering any secular governance in Nashville. Whatever the citizens of Nashville achieve through anything she offers; it is certain to be laden heavily with benefits for Muslims and a strong anti-American sentiment.

 

Often mistaken for Rep. Rashida Tlaib, Islamic activist Sharifa Alkhateeb is seen in a viral and alarming C-Span video, speaking at the Political Awareness Conference for Muslim Americans on August 5th 1989, that I have personally transcribed here, since no transcription appears to exist on Google. Alkhateeb’s message can only be seen as a call to end the United States republic, as she states:

 

“Our final objective is not to just become a part of the system that we experience now and that we see. Our objective … Our Final Objective is to create our own Islamic systems and not only create Islamic systems for Muslims but to look at all the other people who are sharing this country with us as potential Muslims. … we have the obligation … to bring them into the same style of thinking, the same way of behaving, into the same objectives that we have … And in that long range process of making America Muslim — All of America Muslim — we have to have some way of dealing with them … and be very calculated about it, or else we will not accomplish our goals”

 

Quoting a lady who had asked her a question, Sharia added: “We’re not American. We’re Muslim”.

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4711383/ Star-alkhateeb-span-speech-1989

 

In 2015, the Center for Security Policy found that fifty-one percent of U.S. Muslims want Sharia Law in America. Only thirty-nine percent of those polled acknowledged Muslims should be held accountable by American courts.

 

VIDEO: Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution?

 

[Posted by Fox News

Sep 23, 2015

 

American Muslims speak out on ‘Hannity’ Watch David Webb and Sean Hannity talk about Controversies, Islam, and Religion on Hannity.]

 

This is simply a start, since America witnessed nearly 100 Muslim candidates for one office or another run across the country in the 2018 election. More are certain to follow in light of an accelerating growth in the United States Muslim populations and no real halt to Islamic immigration into our country.

 

Erasing American culture, traditions and adherence to the U.S. Constitution, accelerating the introduction of more exotic and incompatible immigration populations into America is the way to go for many anti-American Democrats and their Muslim allies, as the enemies of America, they are not concerned by the existential threat the violent Islamic ideology and its jihadis represent to America.

 

They see their actions as a way to edge America closer to anarchy and collapse, in order to achieve their cherished dictatorship rising from the ashes. And not one single person who truly loves America should allow Islam’s Final Objective to go unanswered easily.

 

By Justin O. Smith

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are added by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

‘Nothing More than a Slut, a White Whore!’


DISGUSTING Muslims and their Multicultural Leftist enablers!

JRH 9/6/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

***********************

‘Nothing More than a Slut, a White Whore!’

How the Left validates Islam’s sexual fantasies and victimization of Western women.

 

By Raymond Ibrahim

September 6, 2019

FrontPageMagazine

 

POLIS

 

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

 

Western women are to blame for being raped by Muslim men.  Such is the latest position—the latest apologia—being offered by those Western elements dedicated to exonerating undesirable Muslim behavior, particularly in order to continue taking in more Muslim migrants.

 

According to an August 9, 2019 report, “in the Swedish city of Uppsala … four women were raped in as many days….  Two ‘completed rapes’ took place last weekend, with another attempted rape on Saturday night, and another sexual attack in the early hours of Wednesday morning.”

 

So many (reported) rapes in so brief a time span should be unsurprising considering that, since opening its doors to “multiculturalism”—which mostly means taking in male Muslim “refugees”—rapes in Sweden have increased by 1,472 percent, making it the rape capital of the world.

 

Although Uppsala Police failed to issue descriptions of the rapists—usually a sure sign of their origins—they did issue warnings for women to “think how they behave,” to “think ahead,” and not “go out alone” (original Swedish language report here).

 

Sweden is hardly the only Western European nation to implicate victims with their own rape.  In late 2018 in Germany, seven Muslim migrants raped a teenage German girl in a park, after drugging her at a disco in Freiburg.  (She at least survived; in a similar case that occurred a week earlier in Italy, the drugged rape victim was left murdered.) Freiburg’s police chief responded by warning German women not to “make yourself vulnerable by using alcohol or drugs.”

 

Advice against alcohol, drugs, and reckless behavior would be more welcome and sincere were it not made under duress.  As things stand, it is a copout.

 

For example, after mobs of Muslim migrants sexually assaulted as many as one thousand women on New Year’s Eve 2016 in Cologne, Germany, its mayor, Henriette Reker, called on women to “be better prepared, especially with the Cologne carnival coming up. For this, we will publish online guidelines that these young women can read through to prepare themselves.”

 

Or, as another report discussing the aforementioned rape in Freiburg puts it, “The focus on prevention is a good thing, but also shows how German authorities and media barely hold the migrant crisis responsible for the disaster that is unfolding in Germany.  Political correctness has caused officials to put the blame for the criminal acts on the women instead of Merkel’s guests.”

 

Similarly, in Austria, after a 20-year-old woman waiting at a bus stop in Vienna was attacked, beat, and robbed by four Muslim men—including one who “started [by] putting his hands through my hair and made it clear that in his cultural background there were hardly any blonde women”—police responded by telling the victim to dye her hair:

 

At first I was scared, but now I’m more angry than anything. After the attack they told me that women shouldn’t be alone on the streets after 8pm. And they also gave me other advice, telling me I should dye my hair dark and also not dress in such a provocative way. Indirectly that means I was partly to blame for what happened to me. That is a massive insult.

 

In Norway, Unni Wikan, a female professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, insists that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes,” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West need to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

 

So much for the feminist claim that women are free to dress and behave as promiscuously and provocatively as they want—and woe to the man who dares cite this as justifying male sexual aggression.  Apparently this feminist refrain does not apply to Muslim men.

 

But perhaps the greater irony is that all these excuses that implicate female victims in their own rape agree with Islam’s unwavering view—on display past and present—that European women are by nature sexually promiscuous.

 

Consider Islamic views concerning the first “white” women encountered.  Muslims habitually portrayed neighboring Byzantine women as sexually promiscuous by nature. Thus, for Abu Uthman al-Jahiz (b. 776), an Abbasid court scholar, the females of Constantinople were the “most shameless women in the whole world”; “they find sex more enjoyable” and “are prone to adultery.” Abd al-Jabbar (b. 935), another prominent scholar, claimed that “adultery is commonplace in the cities and markets of Byzantium”—so much so that even “the nuns from the convents went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks.”

 

For all these reasons and more, Byzantine women became Islam’s “beautiful femme fatale who makes men lose their self-control,” as the author of Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs explains:

 

Our [Arab/Muslim] sources show not Byzantine women but writers’ images of these women, who served as symbols of the eternal female—constantly a potential threat, particularly due to blatant exaggerations of their sexual promiscuity. In our texts, Byzantine women are strongly associated with sexual immorality. . . . While the one quality that our [Muslim] sources never deny is the beauty of Byzantine women, the image that they create in describing these women is anything but beautiful. Their depictions are, occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly negative.

 

Such fevered fantasies—which “are clearly far from Byzantine reality”—existed only in the minds of Muslim men. “The behavior of most women in Byzantium was a far cry from the depictions that appear in Arabic sources.”

 

Regardless, not only did Muslim writers/scholars fail to “revise” their opinion concerning Byzantine women; they subsequently went on to portray all white/European women encountered—including Frankish, Spanish, and Slavic women—in the same manner.

 

Today, little has changed (except, as shall be seen, Western responses): all European women continue to be seen as naturally promiscuous and provoking Muslim men into raping them.  Thus in the United Kingdom, a Muslim man explained to a British woman why he was raping her: “you white women are good at it.”  Another Muslim man called a 13-year-old virgin “a little white slag”—British slang for “loose, promiscuous woman”—before raping her.

 

Another British woman was trafficked to Morocco where she was prostituted and repeatedly raped by dozens of Muslim men.  They “made me believe I was nothing more than a slut, a white whore,” she recollects. “They treated me like a leper, apart from when they wanted sex.  I was less than human to them, I was rubbish.”

 

In Germany, a group of Muslim “refugees” stalked a 25-year-old woman, hurled “filthy” insults at and taunted her for sex.  They too explained their logic to her—“German girls are just there for sex”—before reaching into her blouse and groping her.  A Muslim man who almost killed his 25-year-old German victim while raping her—and shouting “Allah!”—asked afterwards if she enjoyed it.

 

In Austria, an “Arabic-looking man” approached a 27-year-old woman at a bus stop, pulled down his pants, and “all he could say was sex, sex, sex,” prompting the woman to scream and flee.

 

In Australia, a Muslim cabbie groped and insulted his female passengers, including by saying “All Australian women are sluts and deserve to be raped.”

 

In short, the ancient Islamic motif concerning the alleged promiscuity of European women is alive and well—irrespective of the latter’s behavior—and continues justifying the Muslim rape of Western women.

 

The only thing “new” is that Muslim would-be rapists can turn to those “progressive” elements that dominate Western society for cover.  For, just as “the Left” has worked long and hard to portray Islamic intolerance, violence, and terrorism as the West’s fault—because of the crusades, because of colonialism, because of Israel, because offensive cartoons—it now adds Islam’s perverted fantasies concerning Western women to the list of reasons that “provoke” Muslims to lash out.

 

Note: For numerous documented examples of Muslims sexually objectifying and enslaving Western women throughout history, see author’s new book, Sword and Scimitar, which also sources many of the above quotes.

_________________________

© Copyright 2019, FrontPageMag.com

 

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and a Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum. His books include Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013), and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).

 

Ilhan Omar Fraud Issue & Brotherly Marriage


John R. Houk

© September 5, 2019

Ilhan Omar represents everything America is not promoting the ironic combination of the Dem Party Leftist and Sharia ideology.

 

Omar’s very existence on American soil is based on immigration fraud, Marriage fraud (as in incestuous matrimony), tax fraud, an adulterous relationship which apparently includes Campaign Finance fraud.

Omar has publicly repudiated the marriage fraud with the support of the Left Stream Media. Even though ample documentation leads to all the fraud accusations, the Left still counts her as a darling lying to Americans.

 

NOW it has come to light that Omar’s estranged husband Ahmed Hirsi and father of her children has gone public to verify Omar married her biological brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.

 

Here’s some info I found from WND.

 

JRH 9/5/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

**********************

Sources: Omar’s husband confirms she was married to her own brother

Congresswoman reportedly asking him to lie for her

 

By WND Staff

September 3, 2019 at 7:47pm

WND

U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. (Official portrait)

 

The legal husband of U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and the father of her three children, Ahmed Hirsi, has confirmed to friends that the congresswoman married her brother in a fraudulent immigration scheme, according to sources who spoke to Powerline blogger Scott Johnson.

 

Hirsi has said, however, that he did not know at the time that Omar was married to her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Johnson wrote Tuesday.

 

The Powerline blogger said his sources in the Somali community in Minnesota further say Omar is threatening Hirsi that he would be in trouble along with her if the truth were to come out.

 

The Somali sources say Omar has asked Hirsi to state publicly that all is well with their marriage even though it is finished, Johnson said. They are living apart and have been divorced under Islamic law, although they remain legally married.

 

Omar was the target of a complaint filed last week with the Federal Election Commission accusing her of illegally using campaign funds to pay for travel expenses for a Democratic political consultant whose wife accuses him of having an extramarital affair with the Muslim congresswoman.

 

The National Legal and Policy Center alleges in the complaint filed last Wednesday that Omar used campaign funds for a “romantic companionship” with Tim Mynett unrelated to her work as a lawmaker, reported WCCO-TV in the Twin Cities.

 

Mynett’s company, E Street Group, was paid about $230,000 for travel expenses beginning in early April.

 

It was in April, Mynett’s wife, Beth Mynett, charges in divorce papers, that her husband became “romantically involved with and in love with” Omar.

In a previously scheduled sit-down interview, a WCCO reporter asked Omar if the reports of her dating a man who is not her husband are true.

 

She denied the claim and said she would not comment further on personal matters.

 

Omar: Claim ‘absolutely false and ridiculous’

 

President Trump last month repeated the claim that Omar’s union with Elmi was illegal immigration fraud because he is her brother. Omar has called the allegation “absolutely false and ridiculous.”

 

However, as WND reported, investigative reporter David Steinberg, Powerline and others have published over the past three years substantial evidence that Omar married her brother to defraud U.S. immigration and perjured herself eight times in her divorce statement. In addition, a Minnesota state agency fined her for filing joint tax with Hirsi while she was legally married to Elmi.

 

Omar says she first married Hirsi in an Islamic ceremony in 2002, but six years later they “reached an impasse in our life together” and divorced. In 2009, she legally married Elmi. She says she reconciled with Hirsi in 2012. But she didn’t divorce Elmi until 2017, after evidence emerged in her runs for office that Elmi is her biological brother.

 

‘The evidence is overwhelming’

 

In July, WND reported the watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a House Ethics complaint against Omar calling for a congressional investigation of allegations of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud and federal student loan fraud.

 

“The evidence is overwhelming Rep. Omar may have violated the law and House rules,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The House of Representatives must urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar.”

 

WND also reported the local daily newspaper that has provided enthusiastic coverage of Omar, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, says the congresswoman has been uncooperative with attempts to resolve the accusation.

 

The findings of Steinberg, Preya Samsundar and Powerline’s Johnson, Judicial Watch said, are “supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.”

 

In her application for divorce in 2017, she swore under penalty of perjury, among that, other things, she had had no contact with Elmi after June 2011 and didn’t know where to find him.

 

However, evidence, including now deleted social media posts, compiled by Steinberg and others indicates she not only had contact with Elmi but also met with him.

 

The apparent immigration fraud scheme, Judicial Watch said, also may have helped Elmi obtain federally backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University.

 

The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board already has determined that Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars.

 

More significantly, Judicial Watch said, the board discovered she filed joint tax returns with Hirsi in 2014 and 2015 while she was legally married to Ahmed Elmi.

______________________

Ilhan Omar Fraud Issue & Brotherly Marriage

John R. Houk

© September 5, 2019

_______________________

Sources: Omar’s husband confirms she was married to her own brother

 

© 2019 WND

 

ILHAN CALLS FOR UN OCCUPATION OF US


Ilhan Omar demonstrates AGAIN she has no business representing ANY District in the U.S. to be a member of Congress. She actually advocates for the UN to be on the U.S. border to benefit ILLEGAL immigrants.

 

JRH 8/31/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

*********************

ILHAN CALLS FOR UN OCCUPATION OF US

 

Ilhan Omar Superimposed on Chinese Appearing UN Soldiers

 

By Timothy Benton

August 30, 2019

Ocensor

 

We have heard enough of the four, seen their responses in ways that are anti-American, but the one thing we have never stood for was the occupation of our sovereign land, not Ilhan is asking for this by the UN.

 

Make no mistake, the UN is not the friend of the US, they want all nations controlled by this entity that is not in step with the values we as Americans show, is a wasted and bloated organization, yet she wants them to come here and occupy our land, thus giving up US sovereignty over some of our territory.

 

VIDEO: Omar Wants The UN To Handle The Migrant Crisis

 

[Posted by Daily Caller News Foundation

Published on Aug 29, 2019

 

Rep Omar expressed her desire for the US border and the illegal migrant crisis to be handled by the United Nations, rather than the Federal government.]

 

In a speech Ilhan said that we should do what other nations do, call the UN High Commissioner on Refugees, to allow the UN onto our southern border and control the borders.

 

She went on to say that our border security, not allowing illegals in is a gross violation of human rights. This was the reason she felt the UN should be called, they, not us, should be in control of our border, that we should step back and allow them to dictate to us our security.

 

The question I think one should ask, how has this worked out for Europe, not with enclaves that the authorities dare not enter, where people send out morality gangs that attack women they deem are misbehaving or dressed in an immoral way, at least according to their Islamic moral beliefs.

 

Ilhan Omar

 

This does not bring up the fact that more people have joined terrorist and other radical Islamic groups around the world than anyplace else in the US than from the area that Ilhan represents, but she wants to see this expanded.

 

What is more, now we see her embroiled in a host of corruption, marriage to family to give them visa’s, affairs outside of her marriage while lecturing us on her moral superiority, we have had enough.

 

Calling for the US to give up any sovereignty over any part of our nation is treasonous, not to mention the reaction places like Texas would have towards having foreign troops on our side of the US borders, would most likely quickly escalate into a shooting conflict, yet this is what Ilhan is calling for.

 

The question we need to ask is, “Do we want Chinese, Iranian, or any other nation’s soldiers under the UN flag ever placed on our sovereign territory?” It seems once more Ilhan has shown how little she understands the US, we value our sovereignty, trying to put troops on our own land would quickly escalate to violence. We must ask ourselves, “Is this really what the ultimate aim is, to bring in forces to control us since she can’t?”

 

Ilhan Omar is the best politician that we have ever seen to promote the GOP, just listening to her is driving people over to vote for anyone but the DNC. We should be thankful for her, Rashida, and AOC, they have aided more the GOP cause then all the money spent on commercials.

 

Ilhan Omar, What Was Minnesota Thinking?

What is also amazing is how little they have changed, the party that brought us the KKK, Jim Crow Laws, Segregation is now trying to reinstitute these laws. They changed the direction of their hate from the African American population to the whites, their sheets for Antifa and Black Lives Matter Shirts.

Ilhan After Screaming Racism Introduces Bill To Support BDS

Ilhan and friends, who we have had to sit and listen to lectures about racism and their great moral resolve, now are showing their true colors. Yesterday, after screaming about Trump’s racism introduced a bill to support the radical anti-Semitic movement BDS.

Now Ilhan Omar Calls To Overthrow Trump!

Ilhan Omar, the darling of the liberal left has now gone so far as to compare Trump to a dictator and say that she is 100% sure that they remove him as they have other dictators. One has to wonder, where are the leaders of the DNC?

____________________

Ocensor HOMEPAGE