ObamaGate: The Conspirators Must Pay a Price


A few days ago I had an issue between Microsoft Windows 10 Update and my PC. In working with Microsoft techs over a period of days I ended with a software/hardware issue with my Computer’s detection of Internet service terminated as in rendered non-existent. Late yesterday a Microsoft Level 2 tech walked me through a restoration process in moments that hours of time in previous days of tech action ended with zero Internet.

 

You can tell my frustration with the post entitled, “Future Blogging”. I thought perhaps I might be without effective blog writing tools for weeks. But thanks to a Level 2 at Microsoft I can resume writing and sharing Conservative thinking that I am convinced Microsoft as a whole probably is not happy about.

 

With that blog update here is a post submitted by Justin Smith calling for accountability for the treasonous actions of the Obama Administration now coming to light resulting the persecution of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

 

JRH 5/21/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

***************************

ObamaGate: The Conspirators Must Pay a Price

Justice Matters: America Demands a Day of Reckoning

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent May 16, 2020 10:06 PM

America has managed the peaceful transfer of power from one party to the opposition party extremely well, for over two-hundred years, but, documents recently released by the Justice Department on May 6th and 7th reveal, that, in some of the most reprehensible, traitorous acts in American history, President Barack Obama and high-ranking members of his administration departed from defending the Constitution and the republic, as they mounted what can only be described as a direct assault on both, and conducted a soft coup against President Donald J. Trump. The record shows that Obama knew of this plan from the beginning, he sought to escalate the coup to new heights, far beyond simply framing General Flynn for “crimes” he did not commit, and, despite their accusations against President Trump, Obama and his criminal cronies are the only ones here, in recent times, guilty of treason.

 

For eight long years America was led by petty fascist anti-Americans who were willing and capable of doing everything and anything to hold power, including fabricating a story against the incoming president and repeating the same exact lies and disinformation for four years, as they attempted to destroy Trump’s administration through manufactured “evidence”. In the process, they deepened America’s divisions and effected U.S. national security, and each and every single one of the conspirators must be made to pay a price for their part in this ignoble, evil plot against America, no matter how deep or minimal their role.

 

During the weekend of May 8th, President Trump observed in a tweet that “Obamagate” makes the Watergate scandal “look small time.” He observed that Obama “got caught”, as he also retweeted a photo of himself with the caption: “Hope you had fun investigating me. Now it’s my turn.” And he retweeted one supporter’s call for those involved to be imprisoned.

 

One must suspend all disbelief and logic to arrive at any remote notion that Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Sally Yates, James Clapper and John Brennan, and hundreds — possibly thousands — of other Democratic Party partisan communist operatives, all went off on their own and acted as rogue agents, in order to set in motion this infamous, disgusting display of treachery and treason without any authorization from Obama himself.

 

Obama conducted a covert operation, a war, against President Trump and his staff and cabinet and many other members of his presidential campaign and his administration by way of weaponized intelligence, fraudulently obtaining Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to spy on U.S. citizens, promoting a phony Steele Dossier funded by The Democratic National Committee, leaking intelligence and spying on many political opponents and journalists. Not only were Trump aides, members of Congress and ordinary Americans spied on, many were also unmasked by Obama administration officials and staff, while several were also charged and prosecuted with crimes, some real, some fabricated, i.e. Roger Stone, Rick Gates and George Papadopoulos.

 

Naturally, Obama and his criminal co-conspirators, such as Susan Rice, Samantha Powell, Joe Biden, John Brennan, James Comey, James Clapper and many others, are all denying everything. But, documents are revealing the truth and their lies. They had hoped and intended to end the Trump presidency by at least three and a half years.

 

As we attempt to unravel the conspiracy, one should look at an FD-302 FBI witness report and the newly declassified information in the May 6th 2020 FBI document, C58W88B61, that proves Obama was aware of the Flynn conversation before his FBI and DOJ heads, as exhibited on January 5th 2017, during a meeting held in the Oval Office. And long before FBI Director Comey’s “briefing” of President Trump on January 6th and the meeting between the FBI and General Michael Flynn, Obama knew that the Steele Dossier was a fake and Flynn had committed no crime, since he was merely fulfilling his duty as any incoming cabinet member would do.

 

From C58W88B61 [Blog Editor: A somewhat redacted version of Justin Smith’s finding can be found on Page 44 of this PDF]: “[Sally] Yates [Acting Attorney General] first learned of the December 2016 calls between [LTG Michael] Flynn and [Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergey] Kislyak on January 5, 2017, while at the Oval Office. Yates, along with then FBI-Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, were at the White House to brief members of the Obama Administration on the classified Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian Activities in Recent U.S. Elections. President Obama was joined by his National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, and others from the National Security Council. ……. After the briefing, Obama dismissed the group but asked Yates and Comey to stay behind. Obama started by saying he had ‘learned of information about Flynn’ and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions. Obama specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information. At that point, Yates had no idea what the President was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an ‘investigation’.”

 

During its May 7th attempt to drop the Flynn case, the Department of Justice noted that the Logan Act was an unserious dead letter law that has never been used successfully in a criminal prosecution. It was enacted in 1799 and intended to prevent individuals from falsely claiming to represent the United States government abroad.

 

During this meeting, Obama gave guidance to these key officials, tasking them to protect and implement this plot that used the Clinton campaign’s phony “research” and advanced the premise of treasonous collusion between Trump and Russia. They also had to prevent it from being discovered by the Trump administration, which meant getting rid of Flynn, who would certainly have uncovered it quickly, given his deep intelligence background.

 

It is clear now that the investigation of General Flynn was initiated and triggered by Obama, and even more clear, this was a criminal investigation that was inappropriate, corrupt and criminal.

 

As noted on May 12th by Judge Andrew Napolitano: “There should not have been an investigation in the first place. The FBI had no business going to the White House to talk to General Flynn [because] they had a transcript of his conversation with [Russian] Ambassador (Sergey) Kislyak,” as he went further and called the FBI’s actions a “setup” of Michael Flynn.

 

Upon being asked whether or not this was a plot that extended to Obama, Sidney Powell, Flynn’s attorney, stated: “Absolutely! The whole thing was orchestrated and set up within the FBI, [former Director of National Intelligence James] Clapper, [former CIA Director John] Brennan, and in the Oval Office meeting that day with President Obama.”

 

The newly released documents and transcripts from the Department of Justice and the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation reveal top Obama officials acknowledged they knew of no “empirical evidence” of a conspiracy by the Trump administration to collude with Russia, despite their suspicions and concerns. They all generally stated that they knew nothing of any collusion, coordination or conspiracy between Trump and Russia, and yet, they all had posited this absurdity to drive the FBI’s initial case and the Mueller Special Counsel probe.

 

A recent bombshell statement made to Congress by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell provided proof positive that an astounding thirty-nine Obama administration officials, including then-Vice President Joe Biden and the aforementioned Obama advisors and Cabinet members, made fifty-three requests to unmask incoming Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s name from National Security Agency phone intercepts between Election Day November 8th 2016 and January 12th 2017. This is now declassified public knowledge that has been published by Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson.

One must note, that it isn’t illegal to unmask someone, if the person doing the unmasking has the proper security clearance. Otherwise, it absolutely is a felony; it would be interesting to know how many new felonies were committed during these unmaskings.

 

[Blog Editor: Here are some articles on the legalities behind unmaking Americans when foreign surveillance is involved:

 

 

 

 

 

And the real hell of all of this is that none of it would have gone forward without the express knowledge and command of President Barack Obama — not the vile and treacherous actions of the Obama FBI and Justice Department that led to an investigation and a vengeful vendetta against Flynn, or the surveillance of Carter Page and George Papadopoulos; not the phony Congressional hearings led by the known liar, Adam Schiff; and not the creation of a Special Counsel, predicated on a lie, and the duplicity and corruption of the Mueller investigators who were intent on ruining all of President Trump’s top advisors and Trump himself.

 

During a May 8th interview with ‘Fox & Friends’, President Trump said: “These are dirty politicians and dirty cops and some horrible people, and hopefully they’re going to pay a big price in the not too distant future.”

 

Grassley and Johnson’s statement continued with the following promise: “The records are one step forward in an effort to get to the bottom of what the Obama administration did during the Russia investigation and to Lt. General Flynn. We will continue to review this information and push for additional relevant disclosures until we are satisfied that the American people know the full truth.”

 

Barack Obama and company are not above the law, and the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, John Durham, and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, Jeff Jensen, must proceed full steam ahead and uncover all the traitors to America, anybody and every single last person involved to any degree in these evil machinations to subvert and undermine the Trump administration and impede its ability to properly govern by sowing chaos throughout its halls and offices. Durham and Jensen must investigate and charge the guilty with the corresponding crimes they have committed, since many, including former President Obama, are liable for prosecution in the unraveling tapestry of ObamaGate and the massive coverup that followed. Most of the good and decent Americans of this country will not be able to rest until these crimes against the American people have been avenged and they bear witness to that day of reckoning.

 

As White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany stated on May 8th: “Justice matters.”

 

By Justin O. Smith

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets and embedded links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Globalists Promote the Collapse of America’s Economy and Destruction of Her Leadership


ChiComs lied about the how and where-from of COVID-19. And I suspect the why has something to do with the Communist concept of  spreading the wealth. In this “the wealth” was not the propertied and or rich, but the spreading of a virus globally that was unleashed probably idiotically on its own citizens causing havoc on the internal Chinese economy.

 

ERGO the ChiComs deliberately allowed COVID-19 to leave its own borders so the economies of other nations would share in economic suffering.

 

THEN like any good Communist worth their salt, lied about the how and where-from even to the point of blaming China’s largest economic competitor – the USA. SADLY the ChiComs are still lying by not allowing independent scientists into China to evaluate the COVID situation which more than likely expose China to lying about the current status of COVID infections and actual deaths. WHICH of course the world’s Left-Wing-committed Mainstream Media reports with complete gullibility the ChiCom line on statistics.

 

Well, there are at least a few journalists willing to write about the obvious rather than believing a proven lying Communist government.

 

JRH 5/9/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

****************************

Globalists Promote the Collapse of America’s Economy and Destruction of Her Leadership

 

By J.W. Bryan

May 9th, 2020

News With Views

 

According to an article in Wealth Daily on April 2nd, “Humanity’s Deadliest Virus: The Communist Party of China,” by Alex Koyfman, the onset of the Coronavirus crisis may well have been in the development stages a full four months prior to being reported by Chinese health officials.

 

Koyfman’s article states:

 

That earlier this week, four full months after coronavirus made the interspecies jump to infect patient zero, the truth about its effects on the Chinese Population has started to make headlines.

 

Officially, the numbers of infected and dead in China still stands firmly at 81,000 and 3,300, with single digits being added to both counts on a daily basis.

 

But news this big can’t stay suppressed – not forever, anyway…

 

As one resident of Wuhan, the city where the disease originated, stated, “The incinerators have been working around the clock, so how can so few people have died?”

Despite Wuhan’s population of over 11 million, city officials reported zero new cases between March 18 and March 22, a near impossibility when looking at what the sickness has done to population centers in other parts of the world within that same time frame.

 

For those who choose to side with China’s propaganda machine, which is now claiming (quite adamantly) that these revelations are nothing more than the Trump Administration’s attempts at deflecting attention away from the skyrocketing numbers within the U.S., it pays to look at the string of lies the Chinese government has rolled out since the crises started back in December.

 

The Classic Communist Tactic

 

The Chinese media is using a classic tactic in the communist’s arsenal to deal with being exposed by the opposition; they accuse the opposition of being guilty of the very thing they were doing, ever heard of Saul Alinsky? And, what was the Trump administration doing that the Chinese authorities objected to?

 

For one thing, there were elements of the media, not the fake media, but various elements of freelance media, as well as some that were possibly connected to the Trump Administration, who were exposing the lies that the Chinese government was resorting to in order to cover-up China’s progression of the virus.

 

This is a classic example of how the communists, and all those connected with them, apply and deploy the Leninist principle. The hypothesis is that the desired outcome is to change the public’s perception of favorable to unfavorable, of an organization that is exposing the communists and their connections.

 

Here’s how they do it…an article would be published in a so-called favorable, conservative, or possibly one with an anti-communist reputation which claims that this organization is a very sinister and dangerous entity in our republic. Events would be reported regarding those in leadership who were racist and anti-Semitic, even if it was completely false. One tactic that Lenin promoted was, in his words, “When the opposition becomes too obstructive, connect them with those who already have a bad smell.”  (Like the neo-Nazis, or the Ku Klux Klan.)

 

The follow-up to the hypothetical issue is that the very next day the story would be picked-up and run by practically every mainstream newspaper in the country.

 

An example is the Boxer Rebellion that resulted in the loss of thousands of lives which was caused by a tactic similar to this. Four news reporters conspired to concoct a story that the Great Wall of China was to be destroyed. The report went into detail and was picked up by the media of that time and reported world-wide.

 

More than likely, the reason China covered up the progress of the virus was because of the Chinese obsession with saving face. They didn’t want it revealed to the world how devastating the progression of this virus was in China. (I believe China strategically planned the covered-up until America was well into the epidemic stage of the virus.)

 

For Asians, saving face is very important, but there’s much more to this than that. The existence of the virus wasn’t something that just inadvertently happened, it just didn’t pop up. The timing of it coincided with too many actions world-wide that collectively pursued the future of world government.

 

The Foretold Pandemic

 

Dr. Fauci stated in 2014 that at some point President Trump would contend with a deadly virus which would result in a crisis that would affect America medically and economically.

 

What we’re dealing with is a world-wide agenda, or conspiracy for world government, and understand that China is an integral component of that agenda. It was a part of it from the time Mao Tse Tung, with help from the United States, began his guerilla actions to take-over the Chinese mainland from the Chinese Nationalists forces of Chiang Kai-shek.

 

Since China is a member of the agenda for world government, then it follows that whatever it does to that end is going to mesh and coincide with what is being planned globally.

 

World Government and UN Agenda 2030

 

According to Patrick Wood, publisher of Technocracy News, The Imperial College in the U.K. is the origin of the global virus and the global warming panic.

 

In his article, he delves into the history and personal biases of the faculty of this institution. It is clear that both of these panic narratives were deliberately fabricated to create public acceptance for restructuring society to accept technocratic collectivism, a system in which all humans are ruled by tyrants, posing as scientists, supposedly for the greater good for the greater number. (a statement by G. Edward Griffin.)  It is wise to study this full report to acquire a deeper understanding of the issue.

 

Yes, China’s actions coincide with Patrick Wood’s article with respect to a possible global agenda or conspiracy resulting in a world government.

 

The virus allegedly escaped or leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. Whatever the case might have been, China covered it up for about four months which resulted in the entire world, including America, becoming infected with Covid-19 before we began to take action to defend against it.

 

Obviously, this could have been the purpose for the cover-up of the virus’s progression for the simple reason that as a result America’s economy has suffered mightily. But the only reason we have economically suffered is because of Fauci and Birx incorrect models of how many people would die.  When one looks at Fauci and Birx’ connections to the global establishment, one can see the entire plan of America’s destruction.

 

China is a huge part of the global agenda, and has planned their global takeover to become the world’s top economy since 1949 and their objective is to secure it by 2049, along with the agenda for world government and communist control.

 

Regarding the role of Imperial College in the UK, as the originator of coronavirus panic and also the global warming panic, it appears that through the members of its faculty it serves as a sort of launching medium for whatever the agenda for world government is promoting.

 

Dr. Neil Ferguson PhD, world class technocrat, and professor at Imperial College in London which bills itself as a “global university,” began forming a computer model of how fast the virus would spread shortly after the “escape of Covid-19. He projected the possibility of a half million deaths in the UK and 1.1 million in the United States. Since this was picked-up and parroted worldwide – it produced the panic which soon followed, which was most likely the intent and purpose.  Add to that the models by Fauci and Birx claiming that 2.2 million Americans would die, and fear and panic took hold.

 

Sustainable Development and the Virus

 

According to Patrick Wood, in the introduction of this article, “People want to know just how bad the COVID-19 virus is and is fighting it worth the destruction of America and the world’s economic and financial system while disrupting the lives of hundreds of millions of people? The story behind the story will make it clear that things are seldom as they seem.”

 

In short and when seen through the lens of sustainable development, aka technocracy, the whole world has just been duped and panicked into destroying itself over COVID-19. The culprit? Dr. Neil Ferguson, the professor at Imperial College in London. Imperial is thoroughly steeped in sustainable development and more dedicated to social causes than academic achievement. In fact, Imperial is very well-known for its alarming research reports on climate change, carbon reduction, environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, etc.”

 

Since it is so steeped in sustainable development, let’s take a look at what it’s all about.

 

In the twenty-first century, the United Nations plans to accomplish its goals through implementation of sustainable development, aka UN Agenda 21, now changed to Agenda 2030.

 

Agenda 21, The earth summit strategy to save our planet (Earth Press, 1993), states “Agenda 21proposes an array of actions that are intended to be implemented by every person on earth. It calls for specific changes in the activities of all people. Effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”

 

So, at this point we can now begin to see how the activities at Imperial College mesh, or play into what China is doing with COVID-19.  We can also see how the narrative connected to all this could have resulted in the panic that caused many government officials to conclude that this was going to be much worse than the seasonal flu, which it is not, and called for drastic measures to be taken to avoid the circumstances. We are now seeing this was all lies by globalists to destroy America’s economy and our president.

 

A recent article, Martial Law: The Trial Balloon Abolishing Civil Liberties, by Kelleigh Nelson is very revealing with what has happened and continues to happen in regard to the truth concerning what we are deal with. This article, in addition to another she follows up with, presents a good case for this coronavirus event to have been completely contrived, or at minimum, partially so.

 

Even if the escape of the virus was accidental, in view of what transpired later, it is very clear that a crisis was manufactured which was not allowed to be wasted.

 

Conclusion

 

It is apparent that since the goal of the agenda is to remove President Trump from office, that this virus could have been planned as the destruction not only of America’s economy, but of Trump’s reelection. It could be that since the conspiracy has him so surrounded with their people, who he doesn’t seem to have a clue of, they could have determined that it will not be necessary for an assassination to eliminate him. Even if he is reelected for four more years, and even though some of what he is putting into force, on the surface, is detrimental to the conspiracy’s agenda, they are secure in the knowledge that their agenda is safe and will continue to fruition.

 

Our goal is and must be to stop them!

______________________________

© 2020 JW Bryan – All Rights Reserved

 

J.W. Bryan was born in 1927 and spent five years in the Marines, from 1945 – 1951. He worked at International Paper Company for 31 years as paper machine worker, and later in quality control. He is a Lifetime member of the John Birch Society, having joined in 1961. After retirement from International Paper, he and his wife Polly worked several years as house parents in children’s homes, both in Virginia and Mississippi, 1991 – 2008. They now reside in the country out of West Monroe, La. where he produces peaches, watermelons and vegetables. He has spent his life fighting to keep our Constitutional Republic.

 

E-Mail J.W. Bryan: alliejwbryan@gmail.com

 

Copyright 2020 All Rights Reserved NEWSWITHVIEWS.COM

China is evil. Act of war?


John R. Houk

© May 6, 2020

 

The Communist Chinese military has constantly been upgrading (largely by tech theft) expecting a future confrontation with the USA. Until that day the ChiComs have reached out its economic tentacles to coax moron relatively free economic nations (Capitalist yet largely governed by Globalist Socialist Democratic-style political parties [i.e. closet Communists]) to be invested by the Communist managed economy of the Chinese government.

 

THIS IS WHY many governments in Europe and Australia are supporting the ChiCom line on Coronavirus/COVID-19 not coming from a Wuhan biolab. They fear the economic repercussions more than the future despotism the Chinese Communist promises globally.

 

Regardless of the treasonous defense by the Dems and their Mainstream Media propaganda machine, more and more Intel points to a ChiCom Biolab accident and the intentional spread of COVID-19 likely that the entire world suffers the same economic setback the virus caused internally in China.

 

American Dems (actually Marxists these days) and Globalists are locked into embracing Chinese Communist economics and join the duped free world demanding the public believe ChiCom lies. Even to the point when joint intel of foreign nations (Five-Eyes Intel – SEE ALSO: Five Eyes, Nine Eyes, 14 Eyes – Explained; By Sven Taylor; Restore Privacy; 2/5/20)  points to an intentional ChiCom coverup. Surely such a coverup is an act of war when Americans die from Chinese intentions.

 

As you can tell from the embedded links in the above paragraph in parentheses, those that follow privacy concerns are not fans of Five-Eyes Intel. For me it is a good reason to believe the Five-Eyes Intel spying on China. If don’t wish the Five-Eyes details above, here is a concise 1:18 video:

 

VIDEO: China-US tensionsA closer look at the ‘five-eyes’ intelligence partnership

 

Posted by CGTN

1.6M subscribers – Nov 2, 2018

 

Aside from the privacy issues you should indeed be concerned about if warrantless monitoring is involved of individuals, the monitoring of foreign enemy cyber-activity is explored in this article:

 

Five Eyes Intelligence Chiefs Point The Finger; Cyber Security Intelligence; Uploaded on 2019-05-07

 

Excerpt:

 

Western countries are naming cyber-attacks by other countries. One of the ideas behind naming and shaming is to discourage cyber-attacks and to encourage potential victims into improve their cyber security strategy and tactics, according to 5Eyes Intel leaders.

 

Intelligence experts from the Five Eyes Intel group, which is the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, spoke at CYBERUK 19, the National Cyber Security Centre’s (NCSC) cybersecurity conference in Glasgow, in an unusual public discussion.

 

Recently the Five Eyes have accused some countries of cyber-attacks, such as North Korea and Russia of NotPetya. They group have also accused the Iranian and Chinese governments of hacking.

 

“There’s a small set of nations who are not behaving within international norms,” said Rob Joyce, senior cybersecurity advisor for the USA’s National Security Agency.

 

“If you look at the countries that have blatantly come out and attacked other countries in cyberspace, countries who are stealing wealth to avoid sanctions, literally bank-robbing in the cyber realm, it’s a small group, you can name them on one hand,” he said.

 

READ THE REST

 

If you use Left-Wing Google, you will have no difficulty in finding posts discrediting the recent Five-Eyes Intel document leaked to Australia media. (BTW you can include the Australian government trying to poke wholes in the document and they are a part of Five-Eyes). You should really compare the pro-ChiCom governments/MSM poking wholes to those refusing to submit to Communist despotism highlighting the Five-Eyes revelations.

 

I have series of short videos summarizing the Five-Eyes findings. For more detail here are some early May posts from sources:

 

 

 

 

As I was preparing to post this on 5/4, distractions interrupted that process. As a result I am adding some articles to the videos I found that confirm my thoughts that there is a war looming with Communist China. OR Donald Trump would be wise to bury the ChiComs with our own military buildup as Reagan did to Soviet Russia AS WELL AS prohibit all American business, academic and science operations with China. The prohibition might sting the U.S. economically at first but will prove an insurmountable obstacle to the Commies in China. It might even lead to a Soviet-style collapse of a Communist government in China.

 

JRH 5/6/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

*********************************

Fox News VIDEO: Tucker: Leaked intel dossier examines China’s coronavirus cover-up [Clip from 5/4/20]

https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6154189840001&w=466&h=263

+++++++++++++++++++++

Fox News VIDEO: The Daily Telegraph’s Sharri Markson on major new revelations on China’s role in coronavirus pandemic [Clip from 5/4/20]

https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6154190825001&w=466&h=263

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEO: Leaked Western intel dossier reveals how China deceived the world about coronavirus

 

Posted by DEMOCREPUBLIX NEWS

2.47K subscribers – May 2, 2020

 

A research dossier compiled by the so-called “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance states that China intentionally hid or destroyed evidence of the coronavirus outbreak, leading to the loss of tens of thousands of lives around the world.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Facebook VIDEO: China Lied, People Died: Inside China’s Death Labs

 

Posted by Donald Trump Jr.

Posted May 3, 2020 5:45 PM

+++++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEO: BOMBSHELL DOSSIER: China ‘destroyed’ evidence of coronavirus outbreak

 

Posted by Sky News Australia

405K subscribers – May 1, 2020

 

A global coalition of intelligence agencies has found China “destroyed or suppressed” evidence of the deadly coronavirus outbreak as it ramps up a probe into the communist nation.

 

The intelligence dossier, compiled by ally Western Governments, was obtained by Sky News host Sharri Markson who has revealed the genetic coding of COVID-19 is nearly identical to a strain of virus found in the infamous Wuhan lab.

 

The dossier cites the scientists’ work discovering samples of coronavirus from a bat cave in China and describes how the scientists researched synthesising a bat-derived coronavirus that could not be treated.

 

The document lays the foundation for accusing China of a cover-up, stating it deliberately engaged in the “suppression and destruction of evidence”.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEO: Leaked Western intel dossier reveals how China deceived the world about coronavirus

 

Posted by NEWZSPIDER

259 subscribers – May 2, 2020

 

A research dossier compiled by the so-called “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance states that China intentionally hid or destroyed evidence of the coronavirus outbreak, leading to the loss of tens of thousands of lives around the world.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Could the Chinese coronavirus be part of their plans to become the world’s next superpower?

 

China President Xi strolling center

 

By Jean Patrick Grumberg

May 4, 2020

Geller Report

 

This is from the New York Post:

 

US officials believe China deliberately downplayed the country’s coronavirus outbreak in order to stock up on medical supplies needed to fight the illness, intelligence documents show.

 

In early January, Chinese leaders “intentionally concealed the severity” of the pandemic from the world, according to a four-page Department of Homeland Security intelligence report obtained by the Associated Press.

 

The analysis also says that for much of January China delayed reporting the coronavirus “was a contagion” to the World Health Organization so they could import personal protective equipment.

 

The report, which is dated May 1 and marked “for official use only,” said China increased imports and decreased exports of medical supplies while downplaying the growing crisis.

 

The report’s conclusions were based on the 95 percent probability that China’s changes in imports and export behavior were not within normal range.

 

There is no public evidence to suggest that China deliberately withheld information for the purpose of hoarding the world’s medical supplies.

 

I do not totally agree. Not that is not true, but it only reflects part of the story.

 

I believe that China had a bigger reason to hide the severity of the CCP virus.

 

  • Avoid humiliation is one. Hide their incompetence is another. And preserve their image of a very sophisticated and technologically advance country too.

 

  • Another big reason lies in their DNA: Communism. Not a single human being would accept to live in a communist regime if he had the choice between freedom and totalitarism. How do you get a population to stay under a tyrannic regime? Fear, terror, violence and propaganda.

 

Now it happens that China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” is their code name to dominate the world. And it’s based on a simple plan: Debt-trap diplomacy.

 

Debt-trap diplomacy is a very old and vicious concept. As vicious as Marxism.

It’s a strategy used by China to lure or trap developing, underdeveloped, and economically fragile countries like poor Asian neighbors, Africa, and weak European countries like Italy, Greece and Poland, to borrow more money than what they can repay to be used for much needed infrastructure projects they cannot afford. And when they cannot honor their debt obligations as China planned it, then China takes over assets, including strategic infrastructures and extract political concessions from the debtor countries.

 

Now look at the situation from the coronavirus angle.

 

  • It must be a coincidence that countries have just been economically devastated by the Chinese coronavirus.

 

  • And it’s a coincidence that economically devastated countries need help, and cash.

 

  • And China happens to have a ready-made program for them, the “Belt and Road Initiative”.

 

Let me put it this way:

 

If I were China, and I wanted to accelerate my grip on the world, I would have spread the coronavirus so that the economies of the weakest would collapse, and I would be right there at the right time to offer them my “help”.

 

But again, it’s a coincidence.

 

++++++++++++++++++

China Warns Of Possible Armed Conflict With US Over Coronavirus Backlash

 

By Tyler Durden

05/05/2020 – 05:12

ZeroHedge

 

An internal report presented to Chinese President Xi Jinping and other top leaders concludes that global anti-China sentiment is at a level not seen since the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown, and recommends preparing for a worst-case scenario of armed conflict with the United States, according to Reuters, citing people familiar with the content of the document.

 

Xi Jinping masked-center

 

The report, created by the China Institutes of Contemporary Internal Relations (CICIR) – which is affiliated with the Ministry of State Security – suggests that the wave of anti-China sentiment is led by the United States, which sees China’s rise as a global superpower as a threat to Western democracies.

 

One of those with knowledge of the report said it was regarded by some in the Chinese intelligence community as China’s version of the “Novikov Telegram”, a 1946 dispatch by the Soviet ambassador to Washington, Nikolai Novikov, that stressed the dangers of U.S. economic and military ambition in the wake of World War Two.

 

Novikov’s missive was a response to U.S. diplomat George Kennan’s “Long Telegram” from Moscow that said the Soviet Union did not see the possibility for peaceful coexistence with the West, and that containment was the best long-term strategy.Reuters

 

Reuters, which hasn’t seen the paper, couldn’t determine to what extent the report’s grim outlook reflects positions held by China’s state leaders, nor how much it might influence policy. That said, it suggests Beijing is taking the threat of global backlash over the coronavirus pandemic – which Western intelligence agencies suspect originated at a Wuhan biolab which was experimenting with bat coronavirus, and had previous concerns raised over the pandemic potential of such research.

 

China’s early coverup of the outbreak – including silencing and/or disappearing whistleblowing doctors and journalists, lying about the transmissibility of the virus while hoarding personal protective equipment (PPE), quarantining Wuhan domestically while allowing international travel, and using the World Health Organization to run cover – has drawn global scorn as COVID has infected over 3.5 million and killed nearly 250,000 in five months.

 

Deaths by COVID last updated 5/4/20

 

Chinese officials had a “special responsibility” to inform their people and the world of the threat posed by the coronavirus “since they were the first to learn of it,” U.S. State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus said in response to questions from Reuters.

 

Without directly addressing the assessment made in the Chinese report, Ortagus added: “Beijing’s efforts to silence scientists, journalists, and citizens and spread disinformation exacerbated the dangers of this health crisis.Reuters

 

President Trump in recent days has been ratcheting up criticism of Beijing, while threatening new tariffs on China. His administration has been considering retaliatory measures over the outbreak, according to the report – which warns that anti-China sentiment could also threaten their Belt and Road infrastructure initiatives, and that Washington could take advantage by offering financial and military support for regional allies, which would in turn make the security situation in Asia more volatile.

 

On Monday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said that President Trump is reviewing options to penalize China, adding that he expects Beijing to meet their obligations under the phase one trade deal.

 

Donald Trump – Steven Mnuchin

 

I have every reason to expect that they honor this agreement, and if they don’t, there would be very significant consequences in the relationship and in the global economy as to how people would do business with them,” said Mnuchin.

 

As Reuters notes, China’s Xi has shaped the country’s military into a fighting force equipped to win modern wars – expanding air and naval capabilities and reach in a challenge to over 70 years of US dominance in Asia.

 

ChiCom Sailors

 

China’s foreign ministry is now calling for peace and cooperation, saying “the sound and steady development of China-U.S. relations” are in the best interests of both countries and the international community, and that “any words or actions that engage in political manipulation or stigmatization under the pretext of the pandemic, including taking the opportunity to sow discord between countries, are not conducive to international cooperation against the pandemic.

 

Trump, meanwhile, announced that he will cut off funding for the World Health Organization (WHO) for being “very China-centric.”

 

And while the world focuses on China’s response to the virus, Australia – where two scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted coronavirus experiments overseas – has called for an international investigation into the origins and spread of COVID-19, while the so-called ‘five eyes’ Western intelligence agencies explore whether coronavirus escaped from the Wuhan lab – while operating under the assumption that it’s a non-modified virus of natural origin.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++

Here Are The Key Findings From The Bombshell Government Dossier On China’s Bat Virus Program

 

By Tyler Durden

05/03/2020 – 10:15

ZeroHedge

 

A leaked dossier compiled by Western intelligence agencies concludes that China lied and deliberately suppressed or destroyed evidence during the crucial early days of the COVID-19 outbreak, and notes that Chinese researchers have been experimenting with – and creating – deadly bat coronaviruses.

 

Wuhan Institute of Virology

 

Here are key findings from the 15-page report compiled by Western governments known as the ‘Five Eyes,’ according to Australia’s Daily Telegraph.

 

The great coverup

 

A key theme of the dossier is that China’s negligence and lies resulted in the “endangerment of other countries,” as the CCP silenced or ‘disappeared’ doctors who spoke out.

 

Doctors who bravely spoke out about the new virus were detained and condemned. Their detentions were splashed across the Chinese-state media with a call from Wuhan Police for “all citizens to not fabricate rumours, not spread rumours, not believe rumours.”

 

A tweet from the Global Times on January 2 states: “Police in Central China’s Wuhan arrested 8 people spreading rumours about local outbreak of unidentifiable #pneumonia. Previous online posts said it was SARS.” This had the intended effect of silencing other doctors who may have been inclined to speak out. –Daily Telegraph

 

Furthermore, evidence was destroyed, and China refused to provide live samples to international scientists working on a vaccine.

 

The paper obtained by The Saturday Telegraph speaks about “the suppression and destruction of evidence” and points to “virus samples ordered destroyed at genomics labs, wildlife market stalls bleached, the genome sequence not shared publicly, the Shanghai lab closure for ‘rectification’, academic articles subjected to prior review by the Ministry of Science and Technology and data on asymptomatic ‘silent carriers’ kept secret”. –Daily Telegraph

 

China’s deadly denials

 

The dossier slams China’s constant lies about the virus, noting that “Despite evidence of human-human transmission from early December, PRC authorities deny it until January 20,” adding “The World Health Organisation does the same. Yet officials in Taiwan raised concerns as early as December 31, as did experts in Hong Kong on January 4.”

 

China also imposed internal travel bans while condemning the rest of the world for wanting to do the same.

 

“Millions of people leave Wuhan after the outbreak and before Beijing locks down the city on January 23,” reads the dossier. “Thousands fly overseas. Throughout February, Beijing presses the US, Italy, India, Australia, Southeast Asian neighbours and others not to protect themselves via travel restrictions, even as the PRC imposes severe restrictions at home.”

 

The dossier also notes that China successfully pressured the EU to strike language about PRC disinformation, and has threatened Australia for continuing to investigate.

 

“As Australia calls for an independent inquiry into the pandemic, PRC threatens to cut off trade with Australia. PRC has likewise responded furiously to US calls for transparency.”

 

Engineered?

 

While the leaked dossier does not reach a conclusion whether COVID-19 is of natural origin or engineered, it includes a February 6 study from the South China University of Technology which suggested “the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.

 

The paper was withdrawn due to what its lead author said was a lack of direct evidence, however the dossier notes that scholar Yanzhong Huang said on March 5 “No scientists have confirmed or refuted the paper’s findings.”

 

That said, the Telegraph notes that the official US position is that the virus was not engineered, but that it escaped from either the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the Chinese CDC, which is located roughly 900 feet from the Wuhan wet market from which a cluster of early cases emerged.

 

A Senior Intelligence Source tells me there is agreement among most of the 17 Intelligence agencies that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan lab. The source stressed that the release is believed to be a MISTAKE, and was not intentional.

— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) May 2, 2020

 

“The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not man-made or genetically modified,” said acting Director of National Intelligence, Richard Grenell, adding “The IC will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan.”

 

China’s ‘risky bat research’ and creation of deadly viruses

 

While the international scientific consensus is that COVID-19 wasn’t manmade, the Western intelligence dossier highlights research by scientists Shi Zhengli and her protégé Peng Zhou, whose work on bat coronavirus Zero Hedge highlighted in January, and who were modifying bat coronavirus to test its transmissibility to other species.

 

Shi Zhengli, director of the Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Wuhan Institute of Virology, who working in Australia in 2006.

 

It notes a 2013 study conducted by a team of researchers, including Dr Shi, who collected a sample of horseshoe bat faeces from a cave in Yunnan province, China, which was later found to contain a virus 96.2 per cent identical to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused COVID-19.

 

The research dossier also references work done by the team to synthesise SARS-like coronaviruses, to analyse whether they could be transmissible from bats to mammals. This means they were altering parts of the virus to test whether it was transmissible to different species. –Daily Telegraph

 

A November 2015 study from Zhengli and her team in conjunction with the University of North Carolina concluded that the SARS-like coronavirus could jump directly from bats to humans, and there is currently no cure or treatment.

 

The Western dossier notes from the study: “To examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein — from the RsSHCO14-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats — in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone.”

 

“This virus is highly pathogenic and treatments developed against the original SARS virus in 2002 and the ZMapp drugs used to fight ebola fail to neutralise and control this particular virus,” said North Carolina University Professor Ralph Baric, a co-author on the 2015 paper.

 

A few years later, in March 2019, Dr Shi and her team, including Peng Zhou, who worked in Australia for five years, published a review ­titled Bat Coronaviruses in China in the medical journal Viruses, where they wrote that they “aim to predict virus hot spots and their cross-species transmission potential”, describing it as a matter of “urgency to study bat corona­viruses in China to understand their potential of causing another outbreak. Their review stated: “It is highly likely that future SARS or MERS like coronavirus outbreaks will originate from bats, and there is an increased probability that this will occur in China.”

 

The report notes that Dr. Shi’s research continues to this day, telling Scientific American “Bat-borne coronaviruses will cause more outbreaks … We must find them before they find us.”

 

Zhengli and Zhou’s Australian research

 

Both Shi and Zhou spent three years at Australia’s Animal Health Laboratory – operated by the country’s national science agency CSIRO. Between 2011 and 2014, Zhou arranged for wild bats to be caught and transported alive from Queensland to the lab in Victoria, where they were euthanized, dissected and studied for deadly viruses.

 

While the United States has since cut all funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, CSIRO refused to acknowledge questions over whether it was still collaborating with lab.

 

Wuhan lab worker who disappeared…

 

The Telegraph notes the case of Huang Yan Ling, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology who is rumored to be “patient zero” after having been the first to be diagnosed with the disease.

 

Then came her reported disappearance, with her biography and image deleted from the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s website.

 

On February 16 the institute denied she was ­patient zero and said she was alive and well, but there has been no proof of life since then, fanning speculation. –Daily Telegraph

 

Key dates in the coverup:

 

November 9, 2015: Wuhan Institute of Virology publish a study revealing they created a new virus in the lab from SARS-CoV.

 

December 6, 2019: Five days after a man linked to Wuhan’s seafood market presented pneumonia-like symptoms, his wife contracts it, suggesting human to human transmission.

 

December 27: China’s health authorities told a novel disease, then affecting some 180 patients, was caused by a new coronavirus.

 

December 26-30: Evidence of new virus emerges from Wuhan patient data.

 

December 31: Chinese internet authorities begin censoring terms from social media such as Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia.

 

January 1, 2020: Eight Wuhan doctors who warned about new virus are detained and condemned.

 

January 3: China’s top health authority issues a gag order.

 

January 5: Wuhan Municipal Health Commission stops releasing daily updates on new cases. Continues until January 18.

 

January 10: PRC official Wang Guangfa says outbreak “under control” and mostly a “mild condition”.

 

January 12: Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s lab in Shanghai is closed by authorities for “rectification”, one day after it shares genomic sequence data with the world for the first time.

 

January 14: PRC National Health Commission chief Ma Xiaowei privately warns colleagues the virus is likely to develop into a major public health event.

 

January 24: Officials in Beijing prevent the Wuhan Institute of Virology from sharing sample isolates with the University of Texas.

 

February 6: China’s internet watchdog tightens controls on social media platforms.

 

February 9: Citizen-journalist and local businessman Fang Bin disappears.

 

April 17: Wuhan belatedly raises its official fatalities by 1290.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

CCP Launched The Virus Because They Are Dying, Had No Choice If To Remain In Power

 

Posted by Nwo Report

May 4, 2020

By L Todd Wood

NWO REPORT

 

Mother’s Crusade

 

I find it humorous the coordinated, across-the-board narrative being spun by the media who are gleefully accepting and promoting the new ‘consensus’ that the Chinese coronavirus was from an ‘accident’ at the Wuhan lab and ‘not genetically modified’ and ‘not intentionally released’. I’ve heard this from so many media sources in the exact same phraseology recently it makes me laugh. They really do think we are dumb. Brett Baier says it every chance he gets.

 

Sure, the virus was not ‘intentionally released’ right before the 2020 presidential election, and not ‘intentionally released’ right after the failed Russia hoax and failed impeachment sham. It was not ‘intentionally released’ a couple weeks after Bill Gates’ Event 201 which war-gamed a global coronavirus pandemic. If you believe that, I’ve got some oceanfront property in Wuhan to sell you.

 

There are a couple possible reasons for this cuckery I suppose. The first is, Donald Trump knows full well what the virus is — a bioweapon and an act of war, but if he confirms this to the American public, we are in WWIII. No one wants this and I can understand this decision. However, the Chinese Communist Party MUST face consequences…and must be pushed from power, for the good of the world.

 

The other possibility is the CCP is pushing this narrative into their bought-and-paid-for American media enablers and their paid-for members of the Democratic Party. China doesn’t want the truth to come out. That much is obvious. They are slow-walking the information out, trying to contain the damage.

 

The real truth probably contains a little of both of the above.

 

The Chinese Communist Party is dying. The process started when Donald J. Trump was elected President of the United States of America, and the globalist (meaning communist) agenda began to die.

 

All of this is crystal clear. China engineered the ‘free trade’ mantra for the last three decades, gained entry into the WTO during the compliant Bush 43 presidency, and simply bought American companies and their technology with the fantasy of having access to the ‘Chinese market’. A billion people! Of course, they wanted in. As the charade played out, they dumped products on American soil and starved American manufacturing. It was a snowball effect that ended up with the U.S. not being able to make anything, including its own medicine.

 

Trump is a clear and present danger to the model. And, they know it. This is why they want him gone. This is why the Chinese-controlled American media is pushing Beijing’s narrative. I mean really, socialist is just communist lite. And liberals love nothing but socialism and the totalitarianism it eventually brings. Just look at Democratic governors and their ‘lockdowns’ to see obvious evidence of this.

 

But, America and the West have become ‘woke’ to China’s diabolical treachery.

 

China builds massive cities already that are uninhabited just to keep the population working. The Trump tariffs looked to put so much pressure on this failed model that the CCP leadership knew civil unrest was soon to follow.

 

They simply could not let this happen…hence the pandemic, and the American lockdowns promoted by their media lackeys.

 

No one wants a war. However, it may come to that, and America needs to face this reality, just as we had to be pulled kicking and screaming into WWIII to face the evil of Nazi Germany.

 

The Chinese Communist Party is no less evil. They have over one million of their own citizens in concentration camps. They slice open political prisoners alive to harvest their organs. They welded their own citizen’s doors shut in Wuhan and starved them to death. They infected the world intentionally with the virus. They are blackmailing the world with medical supplies.

 

Yes, the virus was released intentionally. Yes, it is genetically modified. It is not found in nature. Yes, our intelligence agencies know this.

 

And yes, Chinese Communist Party rule is dying. The problem is, it will not go quietly, and we should expect more pain inflicted upon the world as it is forced from power.

 

That is why they shut down our economy. The want us weak, so they can make their move, like an evil dragon backed into a corner.

_______________________________

China is evil. Act of war?

John R. Houk

© May 6, 2020

____________________________

Could the Chinese coronavirus be part of their plans to become the world’s next superpower?

 

Copyright © 2020 Geller Report News

____________________________

China Warns Of Possible Armed Conflict With US Over Coronavirus Backlash

 

AND

 

Here Are The Key Findings From The Bombshell Government Dossier On China’s Bat Virus Program

 

Copyright ©2009-2020 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD

__________________________

CCP Launched The Virus Because They Are Dying, Had No Choice If To Remain In Power

 

© 2020 NWO REPORT

Originally COPYRIGHT · 2013 – 2020 CD Media [Creative Destruction Media LLC] · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

Communists Lied – The People Died


The title proclaims it all: Communists are liars and the result is people die.

 

JRH 4/30/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

****************************

Communists Lied – The People Died

 

Communist China map

 

H/T Tim Brown at USA.Life

By Jerry Newcombe originally at WND

April 29, 2020

The Washington Standard

 

Worldviews have consequences. The pandemic that grips the whole world is symptomatic of the deadly grip the ungodly leadership in China holds over a wide populous (including tens of millions of Chinese Christians).

 

The coronavirus did not just come out of nowhere. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) claims that it came out of the wet markets of Wuhan, a city of about 11 million people. But there is evidence that it may have originated in a biolab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

 

Steven Mosher, the president of the Population Research Institute, certainly thinks so. He says corners were being cut, leading to the virus escaping from the lab. But the CCP tried to hide these things. As we know now, they allowed flights from Wuhan to the rest of the world, but not flights from Wuhan to other parts of China.

 

Recently, I interviewed Mosher on my radio show. He argued, “This didn’t come from nature. This came from man. This came from the leadership of the Communist Party, which was putting a rush on research in their biolab in Wuhan. And I think they were putting so much pressure on the research that the researchers cut corners, and this dangerous coronavirus … escaped from the lab.”

 

Mosher continued, “And there the story gets even worse. Because after it escapes, it could have been contained very, very quickly by using means that we’re all familiar with – contact-tracing, finding out who Patient Zero was, tracing that person’s contacts, putting those people under quarantine. Instead, the deadly virus was allowed to spread throughout the city of Wuhan. China hid it. … Even to this present day, they are still hiding what they know about the virus.”

 

And yet millions of Americans are ready to blame President Trump for the virus crisis rather the actual perpetrators.

 

Furthermore, millions of young Americans want to see America become a socialist nation – which often leads to communism. They think socialism means sharing and fairness to everybody.

 

A recent Gallup poll found that the younger you are in America, the higher your view of socialism. Only 51% of Americans aged 18-39 had a high view of capitalism, with 49% preferring socialism. At the same time, of those older than 55, 68% were positive toward capitalism but only 32% in favor of socialism.

 

Gary Bauer of American Values told me in a recent TV interview: “I think all of us have been disturbed by polling data that shows that young Americans particularly seem to be very open, if not outwardly and completely supportive, of socialism. … The majority of students that are saying that socialism is a good thing have not been educated in any way shape or form about what socialism is.”

 

Mosher noted the CCP (and communism everywhere) is built on a series of lies:

 

  • There is no God.

 

  • Man is not made in the image of God; instead he’s just a little higher than the apes.

 

  • The Party can create paradise on earth, if you give it all power.

 

Chairman Mao, who forced communism on China in 1949, is the greatest mass-murderer in the history of humanity, exterminating as many as 45 million of his own people. When he took over the world’s most populated country, one of the goals was to “dominate wider parts of the world,” notes Mosher. And in 1958, Mao set up the “Earth Control Committee.”

 

Thus, it is possible that the whole world has been upended by a group of atheists who reacted criminally in response to accidents in a lab that was dealing with very dangerous substances. No wonder the state of Missouri filed a lawsuit last week against the government of China.

 

At least we can say that their irresponsible reaction to the virus once it began to spread has brought misery to many parts of the world. Many Chinese people themselves would gladly not have the Communists rule over them. But, amazingly, as noted, we have many in America who want communism or socialism.

 

I asked Mosher about this trend among young people. He chalked it up to the naivete of the young and the “miseducation” many of them receive in the schools.

 

They think socialism can work – if just the right people put it into practice. But in every communist regime, Mosher observes, those in charge kill at least about 10-15% of their own people in order to remove the “counter-revolutionaries.”

 

Of all the sins and crimes of communism throughout the last century and a half – and there have been many – the outbreak of the coronavirus and the failure of the CCP to truly cooperate with other agencies to control this before it became a pandemic has got to be among the greatest of all.

 

There was an old saying during the Cold War, “You can trust the communists to act like communists.” It is about time naïve Americans woke up to the rotten fruit of communism.

 

Article posted with permission from Jerry Newcombe

________________________________

Copyright © The Washington Standard, All Rights Reserved. Our posts contain affiliate links and we earn a small commission from those links. This is how we help to make money so we can continue to bring you amazing content. Thank you for your support.

 

FBI failed to review Steele’s ties to Russians, warned some of dossier was Moscow disinformation


Here’s the follow up to yesterday’s cross post of the Just The News title, “Russia case footnotes to be declassified, exposing FBI concerns about Steele disinformation”.

 

This follow up links to the PDF that partially unredacts IG Horowitz’s foot notes that expose FBI deception in its presentation to a FISA Court to get secret warrants to spy on the Trump campaign. The follow is entitled, “FBI failed to review Steele’s ties to Russians, warned some of dossier was Moscow disinformation”.

 

JRH 4/11/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

**************************

FBI failed to review Steele’s ties to Russians, warned some of dossier was Moscow disinformation

Declassified footnote lays out intelligence community concerns about Steele’s ties to Russia and disinformation

 

FBI to face new scrutiny with declassified Russia case notes. Official FBI Photo

 

By John Solomon

Last Updated: April 10, 2020 – 6:28pm

Just The News

 

Key FBI officials failed to review an intelligence file identifying Christopher Steele’s ties to Russian oligarchs and were later advised some of the information he provided agents in his dossier appeared to be misinformation planted by Russian intelligence, according to declassified information made public Friday.

 

The explosive revelations were contained in footnotes that had been originally redacted from Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s December report on FBI failures in the Russia case. The information was provided to two Senate committees in recent days.

 

One of the newly declassified footnotes highlights a glaring misstep early in the Russia case, when key officials failed to review the intelligence control file for Steele, a former MI6 agent who approached the FBI with unverified allegations about Trump after he was hired to do opposition research by the firm working for Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party.

 

Checking such files is a basic procedure in a counterintelligence probe when an informant is involved, officials told Just the News.

 

The footnote states that an FBI intelligence analyst and a supervisory special agent working on the Crossfire Hurricane probe admitted they “did not recall reviewing information in Steele’s Delta file documenting Steele’s frequent contacts with representatives for multiple Russian oligarchs in 2015.”

 

“In addition to the information in Steele’s Delta file documenting Steele’s frequent contacts with representatives for multiple Russian oligarch, we identified reporting the Crossfire Hurricane team received [redacted] indicating the potential for Russia disinformation influencing Steele’s election reporting,” a second footnote revealed.

 

Specifically, that footnote added: “A [redacted] 2017 report relayed information from [redacted] outlining an inaccuracy in a limited subset of Steele’s reporting about the activities of (former Trump lawyer) Michael Cohen. The [redacted] stated that it did not have high confidence in this subset of Steele’s reporting and assessed that the referenced subset was part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations.”

 

[Partially un]RedactedHorowitzFootnotes.pdf

 

That same footnote reveals a separate report to the FBI, dated 2017, “contained information … that the public reporting about the details of Trump’s [REDACTED] activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false, and that they were the product of RIS ‘infiltra[ing] a source into the network’ of a [REDACTED] who compiled a dossier of information on Trump’s activities.” RIS is an acronym for Russian intelligence services.

 

The new information provides the most explosive information to date that FBI officials had serious reason to doubt Steele’s dossier when it first arrived and during the time it was used to support FISA surveillance warrants targeting the Trump campaign in late 2016 and 2017.

 

Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who worked to get the footnotes declassified, said Friday the information withheld from the American public for two years confirms the FBI collusion probe that dogged the Trump administration was flawed from start to finish and covered up by a false narrative driven by news media leaks.

 

“For years, the public was fed a healthy diet of leaks, innuendo and false information to imply that President Trump and his campaign were part of a Russian conspiracy to spread disinformation,” the senators said. “The FBI’s blind pursuit of the investigation, despite exculpatory and contradictory information, only legitimized the narrative.

 

“The mounting evidence undercutting this narrative should have stopped the investigation early in its tracks. Instead, it took several years and millions in taxpayer dollars to conclude that the allegations were baseless.”

 

You can read the newly declassified documents here.

 

[Partially un]RedactedHorowitzFootnotes.pdf

______________________________

© 2020 Bentley Media Group, LLC

 

About Just The News

 

JusttheNews.com is committed to just reporting facts from journalists with a long record of public trust and excellence. In an era where opinion and supposition are too often substituted for fact and where journalists rush to get things first and hope their stories are correct, JusttheNews.com tries to stand out by returning to the bedrock promise of getting news first, but first getting it right. We try to deliver exclusive news you can trust.

 

JusttheNews.com is a back-to-the-future initiative where old-fashioned, honest and exclusive reporting is delivered in a neutral voice, but delivered through the modern channels of YouTube, podcasting, e-books and social media. And in a twist of old and new, JusttheNews.com journalists deliver unprecedented transparency by offering a Dig Deeper tool on their Web site that READ THE REST

 

Russia case footnotes to be declassified, exposing FBI concerns about Steele disinformation


Declassified case notes referring to Christopher Steele deception and FBI knowledge of that deception demonstrates just how infested and invested the FBI is as a Deep State agent to take down a sitting President. NO ONE past or present in the FBI to date has been accountable! WHY THE HELL NOT?!

 

JRH 4/10/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

*************************

Russia case footnotes to be declassified, exposing FBI concerns about Steele disinformation

Previously redacted footnotes from Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report expected to raise questions about prior FBI assessment of key informant.

 

FBI to face new scrutiny with declassified Russia case notes.

Official FBI Photo

 

 

By John Solomon

Last Updated: April 9, 2020 – 6:33pm

Just The News

 

U.S. intelligence has decided to declassify several redacted footnotes from a recent Justice Department report that will expose more problems with the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s campaign, including that agents possessed evidence their main informant may have been the victim of Russian disinformation, Just the News has learned.

 

The previously redacted footnotes are likely to raise new concerns that the FBI ignored flashing red warning signals about the informant Christopher Steele and gave a false picture in briefing materials supplied to Congress.

 

The declassified sections from Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s December review of FBI FISA abuse could be made available to key Senate and House committees as early as the end of this week, according to people familiar with the effort.

 

John Solomon Reports Podcast

The unredacted footnotes are expected to provide new data points in the timeline showing when the FBI learned, or should have suspected, that its key evidence suggesting Trump was colluding with Russia was erroneous and how high up those concerns were known, the sources said.

 

The new information “will make clear the FBI possessed information at multiple levels that undercut the evidence it was using to sustain a collusion investigation” and will be specific enough to renew a debate in Washington over “whether the FBI intentionally ignored red flags or simply was blinded by ambition from seeing them clearly,” one source with direct knowledge said.

 

The evidence could also raise new questions about whether statements made to Congress during the Russia probe were false or misleading, and whether the intelligence community’s official assessment that Vladimir Putin was solely trying to help elect Trump was contradicted by some evidence in FBI files, the sources said.

 

The declassification was prompted in part by a letter sent in January by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., that requested four footnotes from the Horowitz report be declassified.

 

Grassley and Johnson are two strong allies of Trump who played a key role in debunking the false collusion allegations the FBI investigated. Johnson’s investigators flagged the redacted passages during a review of the Horowitz report and worked with Grassley’s team to escalate to Attorney General William Barr.

 

“We are concerned that certain sections of the public version of the report are misleading because they are contradicted by relevant and probative classified information redacted in four footnotes,” Grassley and Johnson wrote Barr. “This classified information is significant not only because it contradicts key statements in a section of the report, but also because it provides insight essential for an accurate evaluation of the entire investigation.”

 

The two followed up with a letter earlier this month to the Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Ric Grenell saying the release of the classified information would provide “insight essential for an accurate evaluation of the entire investigation.”

 

Sources said DNI and Justice Department are planning to declassify those four footnotes as well as others in the report that will provide new understanding about failures in the FBI’s now-debunked Russia collusion probe.

 

One of the key revelations will be the unmasking of footnotes that show specific red flags raised inside the bureau’s intelligence files that Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent whose anti-Trump dossier played a key role in the collusion probe, could have been the victim of Russian disinformation through his contacts with Russian oligarchs, the sources said.

 

Horowitz’s report in December concluded that most of the allegations Steele included in the dossier he gave the FBI were inaccurate, uncorroborated, or internet rumor and that the FBI falsely represented to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that Steele’s intelligence had been verified in securing a FISA warrant to target the Trump campaign and former adviser Carter Page in fall 2016 in an investigation code-named Crossfire Hurricane.

 

Horowitz’s report also raised concerns the FBI failed to fully evaluate evidence in its intelligence files that suggested Russian disinformation was flowing to Steele, who was working during the 2016 campaign for the opposition research firm trying to help Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party defeat Trump.

 

Those concerns were echoed in the report by former FBI counterintelligence chief Bill Priestap and former Justice Department lawyer Stuart Evans.

 

“In view of information we found in FBI files we reviewed, and that was available to the Crossfire Hurricane team during the relevant time period, we believe that more should have been done to examine Steele’s contacts with intermediaries of Russian oligarchs in order to assess those contacts as potential sources of disinformation that could have influenced Steele’s reporting or, at a minimum, influenced Steele’s understanding of events in Russia that furnished context for the analytical judgments he used to evaluate the reporting,” Horowitz wrote at the time. “We agree with the assessment of Priestap and Evans that this issue warranted more scrutiny than it was afforded.”

 

While Horowitz raised the issue broadly, a detailed set of footnotes laying out what actually was in the FBI files was completely redacted. That footnote is expected, along with other information, to be declassified.

 

Persons familiar with the effort said the new declassifications also may raise questions about representations FBI witnesses made in classified briefings and briefing documents to Congress in 2017.

 

Horowitz’s report flagged one such possible episode, recounting a memo that the FBI provided in December 2017 to congressional leaders that claimed to have dismissed the notion that Steele was the victim of disinformation.

 

“According to an FBI memorandum prepared in December 2017 for a Congressional briefing, by the time the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was transferred to the Special Counsel in May 2017, the FBI did not assess it likely that the [Steele] [ election reporting] was generated in connection to a Russian disinformation campaign,” Horowitz noted.

 

Such a claim may have dismissed or overlooked evidence sitting in the FBI’s own files, the report suggested.

 

When pressed by the IG about the possibility that Steele had been the victim of Russian disinformation, Priestap, the former counterintelligence chief whose supervised the lead case agent Peter Strzok, offered an uncertain answer.

 

“I’m struggling, with, when you know the Russians, and this I know from my Intelligence Community work: they favored Trump, they’re trying to denigrate Clinton, and they wanted to sow chaos. I don’t know why you’d run a disinformation campaign to denigrate Trump on the side,” Priestap answered.

 

Steele broadly defended his work in an interview with the IG. And after Horowitz’s report was issued, the former British spy issued a statement through his lawyers and his company Orbis Business Intelligence disputing many of the IG’s findings, including the allegation that Steele’s primary sub-source had disowned or denied much of the information attributed to him in the dossier.

 

“Public discussions about a source are always fraught with danger for the source and the source’s sub-source,” the statement said. “Had Orbis been given an opportunity to respond in a private session, the statement by the primary sub-source would be put in a very different light.”

 

Horowitz isn’t the only government official to raise concerns that Steele may have been victimized by Russian disinformation. One of the Democrats’ star witnesses during President Trump’s impeachment investigation, government Russia expert Fiona Hill, testified about Steele that she had “misgivings and concern that he could have been played” by Russian disinformation. Hill had previously worked with Steele when he was with MI6.

 

“Their goal was to discredit the presidency,” she testified in an October deposition. “Whoever was elected president, they wanted to weaken them. So, if Secretary Clinton had won, there would have been a cloud over her at this time if she was President Clinton. There’s been a cloud over President Trump since the beginning of his presidency, and I think that’s exactly what the Russians intended.”

 

The new evidence from the declassified footnotes will give the American public a first chance to evaluate whether the FBI dropped the ball on evaluating Russian disinformation in the Steele dossier.

 

Whatever the final verdict, the upcoming declassifications are a pointed reminder that the public still has much to learn about what did, and did not, go right in the Russia collusion probe.

______________________________

© 2020 Bentley Media Group, LLC

 

About Just The News

 

JusttheNews.com is committed to just reporting facts from journalists with a long record of public trust and excellence. In an era where opinion and supposition are too often substituted for fact and where journalists rush to get things first and hope their stories are correct, JusttheNews.com tries to stand out by returning to the bedrock promise of getting news first, but first getting it right. We try to deliver exclusive news you can trust.

 

JusttheNews.com is a back-to-the-future initiative where old-fashioned, honest and exclusive reporting is delivered in a neutral voice, but delivered through the modern channels of YouTube, podcasting, e-books and social media. And in a twist of old and new, JusttheNews.com journalists deliver unprecedented transparency by offering a Dig Deeper tool on their Web site that READ THE REST

 

US Biowarfare Act Author: Studies Confirm Coronavirus Weaponized!


Just after posting “Coronavirus: Nature or Bio-Accident – A Threat to Chinese Communist Regime?” I ran into this video of an interview with Spiro Skouras and Professor Francis Boyle about the origins of the Coronavirus and that virus’ bio-weaponization. Is it credible? You decide.

 

The video description section has loads of links to sources. Again – You decide the credibility.

 

JRH 2/25/20 (H/T Activist Post)

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

**********************************

VIDEO: US Biowarfare Act Author: Studies Confirm Coronavirus Weaponized!

 

Posted by Spiro Skouras

12.9K subscribers – Feb 22, 2020

 

In this interview, the Author of the US Biowarfare Act, Professor Francis Boyle uncovers four separate studies which he claims confirm as ‘smoking gun’ evidence the Wuhan Coronavirus known as COVID19 was in fact weaponized.

 

Professor Boyle also discloses where he believes the true origin of the virus originated and the extent that the US government was involved.

 

This is a must see interview as Professor Boyle also reveals never before disclosed information.

 

Links

 

Study: The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166354220300528

 

Study: SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus pose threat for human emergence https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/

 

Study: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6?fbclid=IwAR3yNfuHykjJbuDGMNqfo6eEFAZ5IqJ_KE9dgcrspGn4xdRQDFBYR8y4MP4

 

Study: The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus

 

Study: Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.06.20020974v1

 

SMOKING GUN: China Bought Weaponized Wuhan Virus From U.S. https://banned.video/watch?id=5e4d9a96ceaa970024aa6fbf

 

Full transcript of “smoking gun” bombshell interview: Prof. Francis Boyle exposes the bioweapons origins of the CoVid-19 coronavirus https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-02-20-full-transcript-smoking-gun-interview-prof-frances-boyle-coronavirus-bioweapons.html

 

++++++++++++++++++++

BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

When Senate Acquits Trump, What then will CIA Do?


John R. Houk

© January 30, 2020

Everyone knows – even the lyin’-cryin’ Dems – the Senate will acquit President Trump of House Dem fabricated crimes in their Articles of Impeachment. Since acquittal is all but assured, I came across an AMTV video entitled, “CIA CONSIDERING NUCLEAR OPTION AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ACQUITTAL!!!”. The 6-minute and 51-second video is by Chad Boukzam.

 

Boukzam asserts the whole Impeachment process was ignited by Deep State mechanizations within the CIA. Boukzam then speculates a Senate acquittal will lead to a “nuclear option” to get rid of President Trump.

 

So, the question is: What is the CIA “nuclear option”. Boukzam use the phrase in the video – “lethal option”.

 

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what the “lethal option” is referring to in relation to President Trump. The lethal option is the assassination of President Donald Trump to not only remove him from the Office of President but to also terminate his life.

 

If you think part of the spy business of the CIA does not include targeted assassinations you are a human ostrich with your head in the sand. If a robustly healthy Donald Trump dies mysteriously or ostentatiously this Boukzam video will come to my mind.

 

VIDEO: EXCLUSIVE!!! CIA CONSIDERING NUCLEAR OPTION AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ACQUITTAL!!!

 

 

Posted by AMTV

661K subscribers – Jan 30, 2020

 

JRH 1/30/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protestor restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

 

Personal Thoughts Leading to B.D. Wright Deep State Interview


Intro by John R. Houk

Intro © January 26, 2020

Frank Camp in a Daily Wire interview with a former CIA employee Bryan Dean Wright about the machination of an America Deep State. Wright self-describes himself as a lifelong Dem which for me has become a dirty word in the English language.

 

In the part one of the interview he describes Dems of his admiration in the past contrasted with present day Dems epitomized by AOC and Bernie Sanders. A point I can relate to because I grew up in a Dem Party family hailing from the Pacific Northwest just as Wright.

 

My Dem family’s devotion to Dems was due to their perception it was the Franklin Roosevelt Dems that saved Americans from starvation resulting from joblessness of the Great Depression. (I have since learned my family’s perception was probably misplaced of actual facts were more public in 1930s, 40s, 50s and right into the 60s. BUT that’s another story.) The Dem Senators of my childhood and early teen years were Henry (Scoop) Jackson and Warren Magnuson. Both Jackson and Magnuson were old fashioned Americans more concerned about benefitting the State of Washington they represented than the USA at large. Jackson in his day was considered a Liberal yet extremely Anti-Communist to the point of committing the U.S. Military to confront Communist expansionism. In essence Jackson was a motivated Anti-Communist Hawk more than he was a Liberal. It is this personal memory of Jackson I have that convinces me the Jackson of yesteryear would have deserted the Democratic Party of today because of that political Party’s lurch toward Marxist Socialism.

 

WELL … Back to Pacific Northwest exposer of the Deep State Dem Bryan Dean Wright. Wright is going out on limb exposing how the Deep State is operating ergo I half-way suspect a tragic accident, mysterious suicide or unexplained homicide might be in his future. I pray not.

 

Below is a cross post of The Daily Wire interview that was posted on 1/25 and 1/26/20.

 

JRH 1/26/20 (Hat Tip NWO Report)

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protestor restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

*********************************

INTERVIEW (Part I): Former CIA Officer Explains The Shocking Details And Dangers Of The ‘Deep State’

 

By  Frank Camp

January 25, 2020

The Daily Wire

 

Bryan Dean Wright – Photo by Molly Condit

 

Over the last several years, the term “Deep State” has been used frequently by both President Trump, during speeches and on social media, as well as by some Trump-supporting pundits. President Trump and the commentators who support him often use the term to describe a group of bureaucratic insiders who want the president out of office.

 

These individuals represent a loosely-connected web of unelected bureaucrats, often left over from previous administrations, who allegedly utilize their intel and reach in order to disrupt the agenda of the president and his allies.

 

But what exactly is the Deep State? Who exactly are the Deep State players? What damage can they do? And what can be done to stop them?

 

On Wednesday, I had the opportunity to speak with Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA officer who now serves as a contract instructor for the military. Wright, a self-described “lifelong Democrat,” was not only able to answer my questions about the Deep State, but provide incredible insight into this not-so-well-understood world of leakers and bad actors.

 

In part one of this interview, Wright discusses his own background in the CIA, the origins of what we would call the modern “Deep State,” the bad actors operating from the inside, the damage they have done, and much more.

 

DW: What was your former job at the CIA?

WRIGHT: I first served as an operations officer. These are the folks that, in short, go abroad to recruit spies and steal secrets. I did that for a number of years, then transitioned to the private sector and did some work in New York. I went back into the agency after a hiatus and served as what’s called a targeting officer. That role finds the people and organizations that can fill in the gaps of our understanding of particular adversaries, specifically their leadership and their plans and intentions. I developed targeting packages of how to get in front of those people and recruit them as clandestine sources.

DW: Why did you decide to leave the agency?

WRIGHT: The original reason back in the mid-2000s was because my brother needed to go into rehab for his alcohol addiction, and unfortunately my family didn’t have the money to send him. So, I had to go in the private sector and earn it. Once I was able to do that – after my brother achieved his sobriety – I got back into the agency.

And then in December of 2015, I left for the second and final time. The reason I left then was more out of sorrow and anger for what I saw happening. And it really gets to the issue of the “Deep State.” I met with a bunch of people that were tied-in to some of our covert action operations – I was reviewing and auditing them – and these senior executives weren’t taking it seriously or tried to hinder my efforts. A lot of people didn’t want to have accountability for their failures. Or, secondarily, they didn’t want to have to go back to the National Security Council or even the President or Vice President and say, “Actually, what we’ve been telling you was wrong, or it wasn’t quite true.” And so I became very frustrated and I just didn’t see myself being complicit with that degree of unprofessionalism at a minimum or flat out treachery at worst. So, I transitioned out.

DW: What is your primary job now?

WRIGHT: I serve as a contract instructor for the military – and some of those details I can’t dive into at present – but that’s part of what I do. And I spend a lot of time writing and going on different TV outlets, Fox in particular, to talk in part about national security-related issues.

I also write and talk a lot about politics. As a lifelong Democrat, I share with my readers and audiences what I see as this horrific drift by the party away from what I grew up with in the Pacific Northwest: a moderate, sensible Democratic Party. For instance, I remember men like Tom Foley, former Speaker of the House, who was from rural Eastern Washington. Or a guy like Cecil Andrus, a sensible, no-nonsense Democratic Governor of Idaho. These folks are the Democrats who I grew up with, and my family was a part of. But that is no longer the party that we see. Instead, we see the party of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Tom Perez, and it’s these absolute bonkers elements that I don’t identify with, are horrifying, and I think ultimately will bring the entirety of the Democratic Party down. And if that’s what has to happen, well, I hope the Republicans can keep a light on for me.

DW: So, what is the “Deep State?” We hear it all the time in conservative media, especially on outlets like Fox News. But what is the “Deep State” really?

WRIGHT: To understand the Deep State, you have to understand a man named Aldrich Ames. He was a CIA officer who, in the 1980s, decided to commit treason and work for the Soviet Union, and his treachery cost the lives of many of our Soviet agents. When Ames was asked why he did it, his response was this, “I know what’s best for foreign policy and national security … and I’m going to act on that.” That’s the definition and the ethos of the Deep State. It’s an unelected group of men and women with profound powers of the surveillance state who use those powers to advance their own interests, whether it be personal or partisan.

And that last bit I think is important. Why do they do it? In the distant past, guys like Aldrich Ames, they’d leak to our enemies because of ego and for money. But in the recent past, like what we’ve seen with Former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former Director of the CIA John Brennan, they’re leaking to The New York Times or CNN because, yes ego and money, but clearly a sense of partisan warfare. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t discount their ego and monetary motivations. I mean, look, they’ve taken paid media contributorships and I’m sure it makes them feel very important. But what we’re seeing is more than that. It’s partisan, and it’s personal. I think that’s different and that’s frightening. I would say that, in essence, is the “Deep State,” and that is what’s driving Deep State actors today.

DW: This may be a bit of a redundant question, but who are the Deep State? Who would you identify as major Deep State actors?

WRIGHT: In the recent past, Comey, Brennan, Clapper are the most obvious, big names. But based on the IG reports, we’re also seeing more mid-level bureaucrats, like the Lisa Pages and the Peter Strzoks and the Bruce Ohrs. These are Deep Staters: folks who are unelected and frankly unaccountable to anyone, using their power and knowledge to satisfy a personal agenda, irrespective of the law. That’s certainly what we’ve seen in the IG reports regarding Crossfire Hurricane, and it’s clear that these bureaucrats had no problem executing their own partisan or personal agendas believing their relative anonymity would hide them from accountability.

I think that those individuals are just the ones we know about. And I think, God willing, Attorney General Bill Barr and United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut John Durham are going to flush out other actors and bring them to account, and lead to further clarity on if indeed the Comeys and Brennans and Clappers of the intelligence community can be brought forward on charges. That’s certainly the hope if the facts allow.

DW: In what malign activities specifically have members of this Deep State participated?

WRIGHT: Let’s start with Comey. We know that he was leaking to The New York Times, and he wasn’t leaking because he had any reasonable belief that President Trump was up to no good. I mean, the IG has shown conclusively that he was leaking to advance his own personal interests. In fact, [it] labeled Comey as a dangerous example to the tens of thousands of current and former FBI employees. So, that opens up this horrific floodgate of the Aldrich Ames ethos that, if you think that you know best for national security or foreign policy, that you, FBI employee, can damage whomever you’d like. You, Mr. FBI or CIA employee, who has access to secret human or signals intelligence – emails, phone calls – you get to decide what material should be leaked to kneecap politicians you don’t like. Oh, and you will face no consequences for it! That, I think, is the horrific legacy that Comey leaves behind.

And again, let’s emphasize something here: Comey knew early on that Trump was not going to be found guilty of having engaged in impropriety with the Russian government. Comey had participated with others in the intelligence community to investigate these allegations. He and the others knew, in early 2017 if not before, that there was nothing there. Think of this: if the intelligence community had any information in 2016 or 2017 that Trump was a Russian spy, they wouldn’t have sat on it. They would have immediately gotten it to Mueller or folks on Capitol Hill, and they would have rightfully brought that forward to the American people and removed the president. But that didn’t happen.

So, certainly Comey has a very clear record, demonstrated record, of doing a number of things that weren’t just atypical, but that were wrong. And again, I think that’s what AG Barr and John Durham are trying to fully flush out.

I think that the other characters – John Brennan especially, but also Comey and Clapper – used the dossier and Christopher Steele as pawns in a political game. Both Steele and his dossier were known to be unreliable in the fall of 2016. Indeed, by mid January 2017, Brennan was specifically on record as saying he gave the dossier no particular credence, according to The Wall Street Journal. Well, that’s amazing. Because they included that dossier in a brief to not only then President-elect Trump, but to then President Obama and Joe Biden and, of course, the principals on Capitol Hill. Why would they have done that? There was no legal or intelligence value. They knew Steele and the dossier were verified garbage. But they briefed it anyway. To lots of people.

As a former intelligence officer, I can tell you that this isn’t normal operating procedure. At all. You don’t brief an unvetted document like the dossier to the president-elect and tell him that he’s a corrupt Russian traitor. And you certainly wouldn’t do it if you had already done a degree of investigation and found that there was no veracity to any of the claims. I mean, hell, you don’t even have to be an intelligence officer to understand that.

But what Steele and his dossier lacked in legal or intelligence value, both more than made up for it in political value. And Brennan, Comey, and Clapper knew it. They knew how damaging it would be to Trump if America were to believe the dossier’s allegations. They just needed to give the news media a hook to run with the claims, which were widely known in Washington but went unreported because they were unverified. So their solution, it turns out, was to make themselves the media’s necessary hook. By their simple act of briefing the dossier to so many, it gave credence to the claims and that in fact the dossier existed. Naturally, the Resistance Media – which went all in against President Trump – was happy to distribute their propaganda.

Let me emphasize: the dossier had been refuted by the intelligence community after considerable investigation. There was no legal or intelligence value to briefing the dossier. In fact, the CIA at the time was calling it “internet rumor.” But Brennan, Comey, and Clapper clearly didn’t care. Why? Because they had an end goal: if they could get the media to report on this dossier, then that would be effectively the end of the Trump presidency, or certainly put the president on his heels for a couple of years. They would utterly kneecap him. At least that was their hope.

So, I think that that is the gravest example of Deep State treachery.

DW: To what extent does the media participate in enabling these Deep State actors to do what they want and feel they need to do, and how should that be approached?

WRIGHT: The most obvious and demonstrable connection between these Deep State actors and the media is that guys like Comey, Brennan, and Clapper now, to varying degrees, have paid contributorships with media outlets. Think of it: we know that they were leaking classified information to these outlets when they were government employees, and now they have jobs with them. I mean, my god, what does that tell other intelligence community professionals? What are the consequence for breaking the law? Because, as of today, my former colleagues can apparently leak based on their own personal or partisan agenda to the media, and then, in turn, can get a great, cushy job from that same media outlet when they quit or retire. That’s a horrifying example with profound consequences to our Republic because you’re incentivizing intelligence professionals to leak or kneecap people they don’t like. If that takes root, what in the hell will prevent us from becoming Pakistan or Egypt? These countries, by the way, are run by the intelligence or military communities, sprinkled with a veneer of democracy.

Is that what we are to become? Because that really is the end result of allowing a politicized intelligence community to go unchecked. And that’s why Barr and Durham’s work is so important. These people have to be held to account.

Now at the same time, it’s not just the media who are gaining from this. They’re also being manipulated by the Brennans, the Comeys, and the Clappers. In March of 2018, for example, The Daily Beast reported that Brennan and Clapper were doing a roadshow around the country to various elite groups and big money people, and they stopped by Hollywood. Brennan told them that Trump would not finish out the year (2018) as President of the United States; he would be removed because of his treacherous relationship with Vladimir Putin and the Russians.

Clapper was also there, and they were doing this to both create and then fan the flames of hysteria. Remember that their audience was made up of the Hollywood elites, the very individuals who control or contribute mightily to the public sphere, create narratives, create truth. So, it is not an accident that Brennan and Clapper would be there in Hollywood in March of 2018 spreading these lies. Again, they knew that the Trump/Russia narrative wasn’t true but, as with the dossier, they needed the media to continue to manipulate the American people to achieve their political end. And who better to have in their back pocket than those Hollywood executives who have our eyeballs and our ears, whether it be on movie screens or television screens. Brennan and Clapper needed them because they needed hysteria. And that’s precisely what they’ve been committed to. Virulently and unapologetically so.

DW: There are criticisms, mostly from the Left, that the “Deep State” is blamed for every bad thing that surrounds the Trump presidency and the administration. It’s almost like a joke to many people on the Left. “Oh, the Deep State! It must be the Deep State!” Is the idea of the Deep State in any way overblown? And if so, to what degree?

WRIGHT: You know, in 2017, when Sen. Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, was being interviewed by Rachel Maddow, she was telling him about Trump’s taking on the CIA or the intelligence community, and his response, then and now, was so illustrative and so jaw dropping.

If you recall, he said, “If you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you.” So, Chuck Schumer recognizes that the Deep State is real, and that they will exact revenge at a time and a place and on people of their choosing.

Let’s pause for a second and really think about the modern Left’s response to the fact that the Deep State is real, and that these intelligence officials will decide our nation’s political winners and losers. Really consider Chuck Schumer’s flippant acceptance of it all. I can’t imagine a more horrifying thing for any person of any party to say ever – because think of the consequence of that. The modern American Left is basically saying, “You know, we love those Deep State guys. They’re real, and we love it because Orange Man Bad. And they’ll take this guy out for us. Because we just don’t like him.”

I mean, they’re incentivizing a bunch of people to continue to break the law because it fits their temporary, short-term partisan goals. Never mind the fact that they’re setting a brush fire to the Republic. I mean, it’s amazing to me knowing how many folks on the Left who have been so virulently opposed to the CIA and FBI, given some of the sins, unquestionable sins – starting in the 40s and ramping up through the Cold War in the 50s, through the 70s and 80s – to now see that our own “progressive” leadership is somehow winking and nudging with our good friends like John Brennan and the rest because they’re taking on Orange Man. So, this suggestion by the people on the Left, my fellow Democrats, who would say, “Well, that’s just silly. It’s a conspiracy…” Well, they need to take it up with Chuck Schumer because he thinks the Deep State is real, too. And he fears them.

DW: Is this type of behavior something that has gone on for a long time?

WRIGHT: The short answer is yes. There is a history of individuals who get this profound power when working for the FBI or the CIA or NSA and abuse it. I can tell you, I worked with individuals who used their abilities to tap phone calls and emails to look after ex-boyfriends or ex-spouses. And those individuals were eventually found out and rightfully fired. In other words, human frailty – or the part of the human condition that is indeed so frail as to be given profound powers and then use them for ill – that has always existed, and that will always exist. That’s why it’s so important to conduct oversight of law enforcement and intelligence, and indeed military communities.

The difference, though, from that unfortunate low level abuse of power is that the treachery of modern Deep State actors – Comey, Brennan, and Clapper – is that they wanted to overrule the American voters. They wanted to upend the free and fair election of Donald Trump. They wanted to choose a different leader to run the nation. Their purpose in leaking to the media was to take out a duly-elected president because they either didn’t like the guy or they wanted Hillary Clinton to win. Many of them, I suspect, liked Clinton because they knew that they were going to have positions of authority or influence in her administration.

That degree of audacity I think is new, and I think that it is incredibly dangerous. And the lack of focus on that treachery is one of the profound lost opportunities of our political class, particularly on the Left, of the past few years. They could have said, “The actions of Comey, Clapper, and Brennan were horrifically wrong and they should face justice. And, meanwhile, we oppose the president on X, Y, and Z policies.” That would have been the right thing to do. As an opposition party, you can do both of those things, but that’s not what the Left has done. That’s certainly not what Pelosi and Schumer and our friends Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Jerry Nadler are doing right now with the impeachment.

All of this has been 100% focused on bringing down the president from day one, instead of having a much more balanced, nuanced approach to his presidency. And I think, and frankly I hope, that that’s why the Democratic Party loses in 2020. I don’t know of any other way to get rid of the rot that is in Washington, and within the leadership of the Democratic Party. Because if a progressive wins – Sen. Elizabeth Warren or, God forbid, Sen. Bernie Sanders – or even if Joe Biden wins, the lesson for the Democratic leadership, the lesson for the media, will not be that their treachery was bad, but that it worked.

In part two of this interview, which will be released on Sunday, Wright talks about what the Deep State would look like if a Democrat wins in 2020, what can be done to root out these malign actors, what the media can do, the dangers of normalizing socialism, and more.

 

I’d like to thank Bryan Dean Wright for taking the time to speak with me about such an important issue. For more, you can follow Wright on Twitter, and check out his official website.

++++++++++++++++++++++

INTERVIEW (Part II): Former CIA Officer On What The ‘Deep State’ Looks Like If A Democrat Wins In 2020, And What Can Be Done To Recover

 

By Frank Camp

January 26, 2020

The Daily Wire

 

Bryan Dean Wright – Photo by Molly Condit

 

Over the last several years, the term “Deep State” has been used frequently by both President Trump, during speeches and on social media, as well as by some Trump-supporting pundits. President Trump and the commentators who support him often use the term to describe a group of bureaucratic insiders who want the president out of office.

 

These individuals represent a loosely-connected web of unelected bureaucrats, often left over from previous administrations, allegedly who utilize their intel and reach in order to disrupt the agenda of the president and his allies.

 

But what exactly is the Deep State? Who exactly are the Deep State players? What damage can they do? And what can be done to stop them?

 

On Wednesday, I had the opportunity to speak with Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA officer who now serves as a contract instructor for the military. Wright, a self-described “lifelong Democrat,” was not only able to answer my questions about the Deep State, but provide incredible insight into this not-so-well-understood world of leakers and bad actors.

 

In part one of this interview, which you can read here, Wright discussed his own background in the CIA, the origins of what we would today call the “Deep State,” the bad actors operating from the inside, the damage they have done, and more.

 

In part two below, Wright talks about what the Deep State might look like if a Democrat wins 2020, what can be done to rein in the Deep State, what the media can do, as well as the way President Trump has brought this bureaucratic monster into the light.

 

DW: Do you believe that if a Democrat is elected in 2020, the Deep State actors will continue to disseminate information, but for the other side? Are there proportionate actors on both sides, or is it disproportionate leaking on one side?

WRIGHT: You are out of your mind if you think there aren’t Trump supporters within the intelligence community, and that if he loses in 2020, won’t be absolutely outraged that Trump was, in their eyes, taken down because of the media and because of the Deep State actors. And you’re equally foolish to think that they won’t use their knowledge and their influence to kneecap the next Democratic president – President Sanders, President Warren, President Biden. Of course there will be people in the conservative world who work in the intelligence community who will find ways to strike back, and that is something that I have been warning about for years. Once you start this process of politicizing the intelligence community, when does it stop? We are marching down a very dangerous road where each side is so hellbent to exact revenge, and we get these political blood feuds that are wildly difficult to stop.

So, I would not be surprised at all if there were attempts by Trump supporters within the intelligence community to strike back at a progressive or otherwise Democratic president in 2020 and beyond because if we are looking at the example of Comey, Clapper, and Brennan as of today, what consequences would they face? What consequences did James Comey face when he unquestionably leaked to The New York Times to force the appointment of special counsel? He leaked classified information. What were the consequences that James Comey has had to face? He got a professorship at William and Mary University teaching ethics, he’s gone on a nationwide book tour, and he has a movie coming out based on his life and times. I mean, are you f***ing kidding me? That’s the consequence that the intelligence community is now looking at if they leak classified information. So you tell me, are we setting up the Republic for a problem? The answer is absolutely yes.

DW: You mentioned AG Bill Barr several times, but what can be done at this point to reign in the Deep State? Not only by the government and people like the attorney general, but by everyone else who has some sort of power?

WRIGHT: Let’s start first with the CIA. Gina Haspel, who’s the CIA director, she can start change. She is in control of the culture of her senior intelligence service, her senior executives, and they are the ones who engage directly with her and the White House, the National Security Council, on a regular basis. She can make sure that these folks understand there are in fact consequences for their behavior, remind them of things like the Hatch Act, what they can and can’t do. She can also, if she has suspicions or wants to make an example of someone, pull those individuals in for re-investigations and have them polygraphed for connections to the press.

She also has that same ability with her mid-level or junior staff, to pull them in on an ongoing basis to remind them of the same things, like the Hatch Act, and that what is happening in the public sphere is wrong; that while they absolutely have an opportunity, a right, to engage in our political process, they certainly should not be emulating the behavior of James Comey. She can use her leadership and her platform to do that.

She can also work with the human resources folks when they’re bringing people on board, to talk about building a new culture within the CIA that reminds people that they are subservient to the President and ultimately subservient to the American people; that it is an honor and a privilege to work at the agency, and if they are found to be abusing the profound powers that they are given, they will be held to account.

Now, that becomes a much more difficult message to sell when James Comey gets away with it. And that’s why the work of Attorney General Barr and John Durham is so important. Gina Haspel has to have concrete examples of consequences for this Deep State treachery. There are other modest things you can do, like stripping security clearances of former professionals who leave and no longer use them on a daily basis, or a project basis – but that stuff is ultimately not as important as changing the culture for why intelligence professionals, law enforcement professionals should not be leaking, A) at all, and B) classified information, and that there will be consequences if they do.

DW: Is there anything the media can do? I mean, responsible media.

WRIGHT: One of the things that I think would be very helpful is if we understood the bias of a particular reporter or media outlet, and then grade that severity of bias with each story that’s aired or published. For instance, I’d love to hover my cursor over a reporter’s name and have a bubble pop up that rates likely bias, with links to examples of said bias. Yes, I recognize the tricky nature of what I’m suggesting – who ranks the bias? But I think there’s a market-based solution to be found.

Another way we consumers ought to flag biased or untrustworthy reporting is when a reporter or outlet uses unnamed sources. Given that Comey has now admitted to being an anonymous media source, it should tell Americans that they should be very suspicious about the motivations of these mysterious people making allegations. And, frankly, it says a lot about the lack of moral character by these sources. They should stand up and say the right thing on the record if they suspect fraud, waste, and abuse, for example. Because that’s how it’s supposed to be done. If you are within the intelligence community and you have problems with your leadership, even the president themself, there are ways that you address that, and it’s not leaking to the press.

So, I think because of our beautiful Constitution, we give our media a lot of leash to report on the facts. But without understanding the bias of the outlet and the reporter, we don’t know if we’re really getting facts, but rather spin. I believe that there’s some good work that could be done on this thorny issue, and on a self-regulating basis. I’m not sure that it’s the government’s role to do that, but nevertheless, a more honest accounting of bias, I think, would be a really critical step to restoring people’s belief and faith in the media. The goal is giving the American people a way to read or watch something and say, “Oh, that reporter is biased, and I’m going to discount this report or give it much less weight than I otherwise would have.”

DW: Which would require self-reflection by individual members of the media to assess their own biases.

WRIGHT: Yeah.

DW: I know that you’re a self-professed “lifelong Democrat,” but what is your political ideology, and has the Trump presidency and the seemingly steroidal Deep State shaped your opinions in a new way that perhaps you hadn’t thought of before?

WRIGHT: Well, I think that like many Americans, I was trepidatious about President Trump, certainly in 2015 and 2016, as the noise was getting louder that he would be a viable candidate and then indeed the President of the United States. But what I have seen over the past three years is that’s he’s playing a very important, a vital role in fact, of blowing up the status quo, of blowing up a system that fundamentally wasn’t working. I’ve come to appreciate that his presidency could be used by the people to create the kind of country, the kind of Republic, that we deserve, which is one that’s accountable to people, that actually gets stuff done, that doesn’t focus on partisanship as much. At least that is, I think, the promise that I have begun to see in President Trump.

And I certainly would say that his positions are reflective of most Democrats, certainly ten years ago. On the border issues, on immigration, he’s saying the exact same things the Democrats were saying not long ago. In 2008, if you looked at the DNC’s platform, Obama was not a hell of a lot different than President Trump on this issue.

So, I think that he represents a lot of common sense on a number of issues that I’ve come to appreciate. Most especially, I think that he’s exposed this Deep State garbage that would have never, ever been exposed under a President Clinton. James Comey would likely still be the FBI director. Think about that. All these others, the McCabes and the Brennans and the Comeys, would all still be in D.C. with their hands on the levers of power.

I think that Trump’s service to this country, of exposing that Deep State, may be one of his greatest legacies.

Depending on how the China issue shakes out, I think that he could be a monumental president regarding how we take on the Chinese. Again, we’ll see.

I’ve really appreciated his approach to the War on Terror. What he has done with Soleimani in Iran, for instance. Under Bush and Obama, Soleimani and the Iranians basically had us buffaloed into a corner, and we wouldn’t take them on because we feared World War III. Well, Trump just gave that a gigantic middle finger and reminded them that they are the junior partner in this relationship, and that we would be setting the agenda. That’s precisely what needed to happen for over 16 years under two different administrations from two different political parties, and Trump finally did the right thing.

And I will tell you, from people that I know who worked the Iran issue inside the intelligence community, they were absolutely elated with Trump’s decision to kill Soleimani.

So overall, I think that the president is doing much better than many of us may have been concerned about, and he deserves a very serious consideration of our vote in 2020.

As it relates to my own personal ideology or philosophy, I would like to say I’m an old school Democrat of the Kennedy/Foley ilk, a Democrat who understands that America was and remains exceptional, and that we have a critical role to play in the world, and that it’s a role that will be respected by our partners even when they don’t like it. It’s leadership through unabashed strength. Trump has restored some of that which was lost under Bush and Obama, contrary to the media hype that would tell you otherwise. I think that’s lost on the modern American Left.

On domestic policies, I think that I believe the same things that I did ten years ago, like the importance of controlled immigration, that we have to have borders. I don’t see that as something that is part of the modern Democratic Left. Trump’s brought that out in stark relief.

But this schism within the Democratic Party isn’t because of Trump. It’s a fight that’s been had over many decades, in fits and starts. We dealt with this desire to unreasonably expand the state, for example, back in the 60s and 70s. Meanwhile, I thought we had put the socialist genie back in the bottle and marginalized those radical leftist elements around that same time. But very clearly, as the DNC declares Ocasio-Cortez the future of the Democratic Party, I think these dark forces are at play again. And we have a huge problem – we being the party, and the nation. It’s a problem that would leave people like Jack Kennedy and Tom Foley rolling over in their graves.

I don’t know where people like me go if a progressive wins the Democratic nomination or the presidency. Polling shows that moderate and conservative Democrats make up anywhere from 35% to 50% of the party. I think our vote will be up for grabs. I think many of us will gravitate to a new Republican Party.

DW: Is there something that you would want our readers to know that you and I haven’t touched on, or perhaps that you think is important that hasn’t been really talked about in the various interviews in which you’ve engaged?

WRIGHT: I don’t think that most Americans understand what the socialist movement in this country is up to. I think many people understand that socialism is bad, although a shocking number of Democrats, particularly younger voters, don’t think it’s a bad thing at all. Still, people don’t appreciate appreciate what Bernie Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez are doing with the Democratic Party, and I don’t think that most people appreciate why that’s bad, not just for the Democratic Party, but for the country. And ultimately the world.

Let me explain.

Our Republic requires multiple parties to hold each other to account. We have to have multiple voices at the table to challenge each other, to question each other. Our Republic thrives or falls based on that broad contribution and debate, and right now, the Democratic Party is becoming a movement that doesn’t warrant consideration. The reason is its embrace of socialists and their wicked ideology.

The Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders movement – Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA – started many years ago, of course. But their plans really morphed and solidified in 2012, as the DSA put forward a strategy document that basically said to its members, “Look, as socialists, we know that we can’t win in this country running as the Socialist Party. We have to rebrand ourselves. That means we register as Democrats, we run as Democrats, and then push the party so far to the Left as fast as we can that the party fissures into progressives vs. moderates and conservatives. We will then break off, taking with us the bulk of the party, the base. Then and only then can we revive the Socialist Party. Because then we won’t be scary anymore. We will have normalized the socialist agenda.” It’s an agenda, of course, that has been rightfully smeared by its decades of mass death and destruction in every country that has adopted it. So, no wonder they’re trying to rebrand it.

That’s where we’re at. And that’s what Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie are doing. So, when you hear them talk about “free stuff” – education, housing, health care, jobs – know that they’re rebranding themselves with unserious policy proposals that they can’t possibly afford not because they’re being serious, but only trying to make the Socialist Party less scary.

It’s all in the 2012 DSA strategy document, all available on the DSA website for anyone to read. I wish more Americans took the time to review it, understand it, and grasp the treachery of Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders. They’re using the Democratic Party as though it’s a host to be invaded and occupied by a socialist virus. The only aim is to strip the Democratic Party down to nothing, destroy it, and then leave with the voters who would serve their revived Socialist Party.

If that were to happen, think of the consequences not just for the Democratic Party or even America. What would happen to the world? What would happen to humanity if, somehow, the United States were to succumb to socialism?

Who would step into that vacuum of global leadership that for so long has defended liberty and freedom? The clear answer is China, a country that persecutes its people, that embraces murderous concentration camps for the Uighur people. That is the government that would be controlling humanity’s future.

That is what’s at stake. That’s what happens to liberty, to freedom, if the United States, imperfect as we are, is no longer on the scene because we embrace socialism.

And for those who argue that Russia might step up, count me skeptical. With an economy the size of Italy and a leadership that enjoys oppression as much as the Chinese, these are not the people we want to lead humanity.

So, if the Democratic Party falls to the socialist wing with all their horrific values, and the United States is handicapped and is no longer able to play the role that it does in the world, imperfect as we may be, we will jeopardize all the progress that we have fought so hard for, certainly since World War II, to create a more just and a more peaceful world.

That’s really what is at stake for me as I watch the Democratic Party fall into the socialist trap, as I watch Chuck and Nancy and the DNC embrace Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders as the future of the Democratic Party. I watch in horror as progressives in the media fawn over Ocasio-Cortez. People like Rachel Maddow and Joy Behar package her as some fun, dance-on-the-roof kind of girl that’s just a lovely representation of womanhood or being black or brown.

If that bologna salesmanship convinces enough Americans that socialism isn’t so bad after all, and we start going down that path, then we will lose everything that we have fought for over the past 100 years. So we have to get this right. We have to self-correct – as a Democratic Party, as a country – because so much is at stake.

 

I’d like to thank Bryan Dean Wright for taking the time to speak with me about such a monumental issue. For more information, you can follow Wright on Twitter, or check out his official website.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protestor restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

________________________________

Personal Thoughts Leading to B.D. Wright Deep State Interview

Intro by John R. Houk

Intro © January 26, 2020

___________________________

INTERVIEW (Part I & II): Former CIA Officer On What The ‘Deep State’ Looks Like If A Democrat Wins In 2020, And What Can Be Done To Recover

 

© Copyright 2020, The Daily Wire

 

The Democrats Reach A New Low – The Dan Bongino Show


Dan Bongino exposes idiot Dems and Dem propaganda MSM siding with Iran over death of Iran’s General Soleimani by an American reaper drone. Some would call this Dem coverage treason. I call it treason. I’m an Independent asking voters to vote GOP to stop this treasonous idiocy from the airwaves.

 

(Endure the Bongino ads, he has bills to pay like us all)

 

JRH 1/7/20

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**************************

VIDEO: Ep. 1152 The Democrats Reach A New Low – The Dan Bongino Show.

 

Posted by Dan Bongino

337K subscribers – Jan 7, 2020

 

For show notes, visit https://bongino.com/ep-1152-the-democrats-reach-a-new-low/

 

[Blog Editor: The Show notes:

 

In this episode, I address the outrageous media response to the killing of one of the world’s most dangerous terrorists. I also address a fascinating interview with Devin Nunes where he drops an explosive piece of information. Finally, I address what John Bolton, and the Democrats, are really up to with the impeachment hoax.

 

News Picks:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MORE TO READ at Youtube

++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.