Some Call it Treason


John R. Houk

© November 11, 2019

 

I heard it said that the most open secret in Washington D.C. is that Eric Ciaramalla is the so-called Whistleblower delivering uncorroborated lies on the Trump/Zelenskyy phone call. When a person offers up lies – especially against a sitting President – instead of being a protected Whistleblower, that person should be held to the same criminal account any person is liable to as in for example lying to the police. In this example, lying to Federal law enforcement.

 

If indeed Eric Ciaramalla is the lying Whistleblower’s identity, he should face criminal charges for lying. If the identity of the Whistleblower is someone else, dear God in heaven that person should be criminally liable … AT LEAST for filing a false report or witness. NO ONE  accusing a sitting President of a crime should be anonymous! If the person is telling the truth that person’s job and pay station should be protected. If ANYONE bares false witness – CRIMINAL LIABILITY MUST BE INVOLVED!

 

If a person was recruited to be a false accuser, the people involved in recruitment must be charged with a crime – NO MATTER THEIR STATION IN GOVERNMENT past or present! If the Whistleblower Protection Act allows protected stated status for false claims and lies – THAT NEEDS CHANGED IMMEDIATELY!

 

Now that at least private investigators are looking at Eric Ciaramalla, it’s beginning to appear he is up to his neck involved in crimes against the government. Some call that treason.

 

JRH 11/11/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

*******************************

PAY DIRT: “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramalla Hosted Jan 19, 2016 WH Mtg. – Same Day US Told Ukraine in WH Mtg. to Fire Prosecutor Investigating Hunter Biden

 

By Jim Hoft

November 11, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

Ciaramalla -Quid Pro Joe

 

So The New York Times reported that Joe Biden’s own staff thought the Ukrainian gas company Burisma paying Hunter Biden $83,333/month while his father was Vice President was “unseemly” or “worse” — and they made State Department officials help them do damage control.

 

Joe Biden said he first learned of his son’t [sic] activities in Ukraine when the story broke in 2014 according to Hunter Biden’s recollection in a New Yorker piece earlier this year.

 

John Solomon at The Hill also reported on the January 19, 206 meeting between Ukrainian officials and Obama officials at the White House.

 

The other case raised at the January 2016 meeting, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money. At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.

 

According to Telizhenko, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

 

According to Stephen McIntyre the demand that Ukrainian top prosecutor Viktor Shokin be fired as a condition for IMF loan almost certainly originated with Biden staff. The demand was first announced to Ukrainian prosecutors at a January 19, 2016 meeting with US officials hosted by Eric Ciaramella.

 

Obviously, this is a very bold and shocking statement.

 

Sure enough — If you run a search on the White House visitor logs during the final year (2016) of the Obama administration you find that Eric Ciaramella is listed over 200 times.

Ciaramella hosted a meeting with Ukrainian diplomat Andrii Telizhenko on January 19, 2016 in the Obama White House.

 

Ciaramella-Telizhenko WH Log

 

Fool Nelson first reported this on October 12 before the Ciaramella was alleged publicly to be the whistleblower.

 

There may have been a series of meetings held that day with Ukrainian officials in the Obama White House.


It is clear that Eric Ciaramella hosted one meeting.


It is also clear that this is the day the US told Ukrainian officials in the White House to fire Viktor Shokin.

 

This is why Eric Ciaramella MUST TESTIFY.


He may have filed his phony second-hand “whistleblower” report because he was definitely in on the plot fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden.

++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

Some Call it Treason

John R. Houk

© November 11, 2019

_____________________

PAY DIRT: “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramalla Hosted Jan 19, 2016 WH Mtg. – Same Day US Told Ukraine in WH Mtg. to Fire Prosecutor Investigating Hunter Biden

 

© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

Conspiracy to Protect Whistleblower Over Fear of Exposing…Deep State


Judicial Watch email with videos exposing Deep State coup against President Trump including Whistleblower tidbits.

 

JRH 11/8/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***********************

WATCH NOW: Conspiracy to Protect Whistleblower Over Fear of Exposing Bias; Ohr and Strzok Figures in Anti-Trump Conspiracy; Confirmation of Enemies List?

 

Email Sent 11/8/19 10:19 AM

Sent via Judicial Watch

 

VIDEO: Tom Fitton: Deep State Fears the Whistleblower’s Anti-Trump Bias being Exposed!

 

Posted by Judicial Watch

287K subscribers – Nov 7, 2019

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos/tom-fitton-theres-a-conspiracy-to-protect-anti-trump-whistleblower-over-fear-of-bias-being-exposed/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=on+the+air&utm_term=members&utm_content=20191108234633:

 

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton joins the Dom Giordano Program to give an update about three pressing topics, including the impeachment inquiry, Russiagate, and the Epstein investigation. First, Dom asks Tom about allegations from Huffington Post’s Yashar Ali, who reported that White House aides were certain that Vice President Mike Pence would support using the 25th Amendment to force Trump from office. Then, Dom and Tom get into the alleged tweets of Trump’s whistleblower, which made references to a coup d’etat to overthrow the presidency, and Dom asks Tom about the legality of exposing the whistleblower. Also, Tom discusses a groundbreaking report by Judicial Watch about Russiagate, and Tom gives his thoughts on the ongoing Epstein conspiracy and a Project Veritas video released this week which claims that ABC squashed a comprehensive story about Epstein’s checkered past.

 

VIDEO: State Department/Deep State Enemies List Targeting Trump Allies Confirmed?

 

Posted by Judicial Watch

287K subscribers – Nov 5, 2019

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos/state-department-deep-state-enemies-list-targeting-trump-allies-confirmed/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=on+the+air&utm_term=members&utm_content=20191109000711

 

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton explains why Attorney General William Barr should take action against allegations towards former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the ongoing impeachment effort against President Trump.

 

VIDEO: Bruce Ohr and Peter Strzok Were Key Figures in the Conspiracy Against President Trump! | Tom Fitton

 

Posted by Judicial Watch

287K subscribers – Oct 31, 2019

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos/bruce-ohr-and-peter-strzok-were-key-figures-in-the-conspiracy-against-president-trump-tom-fitton/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=on+the+air&utm_term=members&utm_content=20191109001246:

 

Judicial Watch announced recently it received through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit 13 pages out of 42 responsive pages of communications between former FBI official Peter Strzok and DOJ official Bruce Ohr that the DOJ claimed previously it could not find.

 

Judicial Watch obtained the documents in an April 2019 FOIA lawsuit filed after submitting July 2018 FOIA requests to the DOJ and the FBI. The FBI failed to respond, while the Justice Department claimed to find no records of communications between Strzok and Ohr (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-01082)).

 

CONTRIBUTE TO JUDICIAL WATCH

++++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

 

©2017-2019, All Rights Reserved

 

These Divided States of America


Many people on the Left and Right pooh-pooh the concept of another Civil War. THOSE PEOPLE are blind to the frustrations of American Conservatives to the two-sided justice system of Dem/Leftist exonerations and GOP/Conservative convictions over the last decade or so. As well as the increase Leftist civil violence perpetrated by Left-Wing anarchists and race baiters. The seeds have been increasingly sown. EVENTUALLY those seeds will sprout into the fruit of consequence. Justin Smith nails the sentiment!

 

JRH 11/6/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

******************************

These Divided States of America

Democrats Push Towards Civil War

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 11/3/2019 11:21 PM

 

“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God ….. ” ~ 2 Timothy 3:1-4

 

In a deranged world turned upside down, in these divided states of America, it is America’s sane patriots who are labeled insane, while Her people suffer under the final stages of cultural Marxism. Society is being turned upside down through the Democratic Party’s attempts at enforcing their twisted morality on us all, and as they externalize conservatives, Christians and Trump supporters as their enemies they use anything they can to smite these people down in their bid for power, discovering satisfaction in destruction, as an end in itself, making their lives seem to have greater meaning by way of their bedlam and chaos. And thus, the stage is set for an epic war for the heart and soul of America, waged between the would be tyrants and liberty minded Americans, between evil and good, dark and light.

 

[Thoughts on Cultural Marxism dated 2007, 2013 and 2019:

 

 

 

 

The key Communist in all these posts is the long deceased Italian Eurocommunist Antonio Gramsci which appears more influential in the 21st century than the violent revolution advocates such as Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong (aka Mao Tse-Tung) and Bill Ayers to name ONLY a few.]

 

Every Trump supporter has most certainly dealt with their dastardly opponents of late, with many of these leftists seeming to justify any act they choose in their “resistance” against the Trump administration and his supporters. Void of reason and persuasion, today’s Democratic Party members are essentially communists of the Antifa mentality, seeking to destroy our Republic by any means necessary through physical violence, while the Party’s more timid members still resort to sneering, slander, intimidation and threats.

 

Asking a Democrat to try to work within the existing capitalist system and respect and honor our American heritage today is nearly the same as asking the protagonist Evgeny Vasilich [or Vasilyevich] Bazarov of ‘Father’s and Children’ to work to make a better world and hearing the words “That’s not for us to do … First the ground must be cleared.” [Blog Editor: I found Justin’s English translated version on a BrothersJuddBlog.com post under the heading excerpted from a Foreign Affairs article (FA subscription needed) – the heading to scroll to “nIHILISM IS PURE rEASON”] The author, Ivan Turgenov, disavowed political and social institutions, in much the same way as today’s Democrats disavow the federal institutions and the Founding of America Herself.

 

These nihilists and communists are always ready with their brass knuckles, clubs, pepper spray and knives, sometimes firearms, to create mayhem in a crowd, just as they have done this year alone, in Portland, Oregon, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Austin, Texas and Tacoma, Washington. They see emerging neo-Nazis under every rock and behind every tree, and in any city one sees Antifa, one witnesses them smashing reporters’ cameras, sometimes their heads, and beating down opposition protesters and the occasional unfortunate lone passerby as their criminal and vicious groups storm the streets, too often with the police simply stepping out of the way, wherever the Leftists control the city government.

 

Recently, on October 25th, a so-called “street artist” named Winston Tseng went around New York City pasting posters over city garbage bins, that depicted his own hatred of white Christians and conservatives. One image shows a white woman wearing a Make America Great Again hat and holding the Bible with a big red line drawn through them, with another showing a man with a MAGA hat, a tattoo of a Confederate flag and a Chick-fil-A cup in his hand, while below both posters read the words “Keep NYC Trash Free”. Tseng noted that he was justified because Trump’s presidency reflects “a lot of hate from white Christians”.

 

And, although NYC has removed most of these posters, as of October 31st, this is the prevalent mindset one finds, in and around the city. It is the exact same mindset that drives most of Leftist America today, from Oakland to Portland and back again to Connecticut and all four corners of the nation, even in cities like Nashville and Memphis.

 

On October 10th, after President Trump’s presidential campaign rally, the chaos in the streets of Minneapolis was nearly as bad as it was after the election of President Trump in 2016. Just wait for their reaction in 2020 and the certain violence to follow.

 

For decades now, leftist professors, such as Stanislav Vysotsky at the University of Wisconsin,  have planted the seeds of this discord and violence by advocating the use of force and violence to give rise to communism in America. Four months ago, Vysotsky wrote: “On America’s streets, Antifa’s militant anti-fascism isn’t terrorism. It’s self-defense.”

 

[Blog Editor: I can tell by the Search Engines Google, Duck Duck Go & StartPage.com; that Vysotsky’s academic credentials override his violent rhetoric justifying Antifa violence. Fortunately I did find some Vysotsky criticism from an ex-Antifa individual too often labelled a defector rather than a hero for truth – Gabriel Nadales, who wrote:

 

Examples can be found from coast-to-coast: Mark Bray, a visiting scholar at Dartmouth College, is a staunch defendant of Antifa’s use of violence and even wrote “Anti-Fa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” in which he claims that ‘violence is a “legitimate response” to groups with incendiary views.’

 

Then there is Assistant Professor Stanislav Vysotsky at University of Wisconsin – Whitewater who writes in an op-ed that: “On America’s Streets, Antifa’s Militant Anti-fascism Isn’t Terrorism – It’s Self-defense.”  Professors at Purdue and Stanford Universities, have worked to create a “Campus Antifascist Network” (CAN) to bring together “anyone committed to fighting fascism.” (Former Antifa Member Calls for Radical Group to Be Stopped! Posted by Paul Goldberg & (by Gabriel Nadales | Fox News); News Thud; 7/5/19)

 

Jim Goad writes of  Stanislav Vysotsky:

 

And in the wake of Ngo’s beating, Haaretz published a piece by a certain Stanislav Vysotsky called “Antifa in America: Militant Anti-fascism Isn’t Terrorism, It’s Self-defense” that was so audaciously blind to reality and the fact that “two wrongs make a right” is a fundamental logical fallacy, it likely made George Orwell’s corpse throw up a bit in his mouth:

 

Many militant anti-fascists become involved in this form of activism because aspects of their identity are directly targeted by fascist violence; they are queer, transgender, gender non-conforming, people of color, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, and certainly identified in ways that intersected across these categories….For them, anti-fascism was a means of ensuring their safety from a movement that threatens their very existence and venerates violence as the highest form of action. Even the Antifa activists who identify as cis heterosexual white males are the targets of fascist violence as ‘race’ and ‘gender’ traitors. (Cracking Skulls for a Good Cause; By Jim Goad; TAKI’S MAGAZINE; 7/8/19)]

 

Too many Americans have fallen into the trap of allowing the Marxists of America to equate one’s love for America and a strong nationalist support of America to being a fascist or worse, a white supremacist fascist. There is absolutely nothing wrong at all with being white and a nationalist who loves America, or black and a nationalist, or any person of any color who simply loves America and all Her traditional virtues and principles. Being a nationalist is not anything remotely close to being a “white supremacist” or a “fascist”. The American patriot of today is a person of any color who wishes to preserve America’s national sovereignty, their individual sovereignty and those original founding principles that birthed Her. [Bold text Blog Editor’s]

 

The real fascists are Antifa, because they do not believe in the self-determination of nations and individuals. They oppose the mechanisms of freedom and liberty, giving preference to strong men and those “anointed” to “lead”, or as it was in the past, to dictate and rule, as they seemingly follow the “leadership principle” out of Nazi Germany and the notion of leaders who stand above the law. [Blog Editor: Justin exposes the irony that Antifa (or Anti-Fascists) use Nazi/Fascist/Communist storm trooper methodology to achieve their Marxist ends.]

 

True fascism — Antifa style fascism — has deeper roots in American history than anyone cares to acknowledge. During the 1920s and 1930s, we experienced a massive surge towards fascism in our nation. And fascism really took off when William Dudley Pelley, a radical journalist from Massachusetts, founded the paramilitary Silver Shirts in 1933.

 

Apathetic and complacent, too many Americans are missing warning signs of the rise of the most critical moments in American history, as the unhinged Democratic Party are drafting articles of impeachment at this very moment based on their own fevered flight of fantasy, and they will most certainly vote to impeach President Trump by the end of this year. Their irresponsible actions are setting the stage for events that will burn beyond anyone’s control, and although still a remote likelihood, if the Senate RINOs should join with America’s traitors and actually remove Trump from office, all hell will break loose in America. Too much of the population would instantly lose faith in our political system — those who still have any left — and there will be widespread civil strife in our streets. [Bold text emphasis Blog Editor’s]

 

If President Trump is re-elected expect massive levels of street violence from America’s ordinary socialist and communist types, but especially from Antifa. And if he doesn’t get re-elected, expect violence from an emboldened mass of socialists who continue to use violence as a tool to push their sympathizers in the White House staff to implement their agenda.

 

And Lord, Lord … just think of the reaction from conservatives and the GOP if Trump is actually illegitimately and illegally impeached and removed from office, before the next election.

 

America has entered uncharted territory, unlike and yet similar to the days in the lead up to the first civil war. It is a situation that doesn’t appear to lend itself to any good ending.

 

On October 23rd, the Georgetown Institute of Politics and Public Service took a survey of a thousand registered voters that rated the division in America, using a scale of zero to 100, with 100 being classified as the “edge of civil war”. The average response tallied at 67.23.

 

Even if President Trump wasn’t in office, the seething hatred between the conservatives and the Marxists would still be heavy across the country. And although most Americans wouldn’t off-handed seek to engage in civil war and we don’t wish it on the nation, most of us see it as very nearly inevitable, given the current political environment in America.

 

There is a hard, cold, silent rage building among those of us who love America so well. It cannot be readily quantified specifically, since it is a thing most of us don’t openly discuss in open company, even private company, and instead it has been pent up and held inside, as we have quietly absorbed each betrayal of our trust that further erodes the Republic and our Liberty.

 

America has witnessed its police officers and regular citizens attacked by thugs during recent riots and the rise of lawlessness and sanctuaries for the lawless. We’ve been preyed upon by paid operatives of the organized DNC machine. We know the game, despite the media’s denial, and we have paid close attention, absorbing it all.

 

Americans see the betrayals clearly. We see the borders intentionally left opened. We have witnessed the Islamic terrorists commit one attack after another within our country, while oily, smooth talking disingenuous politicians seem befuddled as to the motivation behind the attacks. Our American Flag is abused by the anti-American left, and activist judges still attempt to push prayer from our schools and our communities. And most recently, the nation has witnessed the most egregious, heinous act of treason play out in the media, as our nation’s intelligence apparatus was weaponized, to mount a soft coup, by former president Obama and his Deep State bureaucratic holdovers, while more traitors sanctimoniously declare there was no crime committed, in their cowardly attempt to avoid accountability and prosecution.

 

The door has closed for the moment on restoring any higher level of civility to our politics, any further compromise by Republicans means the end of the Republic, and the Democrats are beyond any compromise, as the demand total submission and an end to the Republic, in exchange for an authoritarian socialist state, in which the Bill of Rights no longer exists.

 

Democrat or Republican, not one of the current presidential candidates care to maintain the facade of representing all Americans or ironing out the country’s divisions after the elections. The new real politics of the day is about winning either a conservative liberty leaning America or a Marxist authoritarian America, not both, and the candidates are already being far more open about this dynamic, as they seek to win at all costs. The consensus seems to be that fifty-one percent of the electorate will do, and the rest can suffer for choosing the losing side.

 

Politics is a peaceable means of war, and the red, radical Democratic Party Communist rat bastards have been waging war against our Constitution and America, since the Wilson presidency, and against President Trump since November 9th 2016. They [Left-Wing Dems] may have been firing duds for the past three years, but they keep reloading and shooting, and it’s taking us to a point where they will necessarily need to be answered decisively and definitively and not just with strong words and rebukes. [Bold text emphasis Blog Editor’s]

 

Wrap your head around the idea, because whether it is a two day fight or one of years long [fighting] duration and a hard journey, that day of reckoning is going to arrive. And the people you will be forced to fight, as a matter of survival, down and dirty, will all probably live within five to fifty miles of your home. It won’t be Beto or the federal government and Homeland Security knocking in your door to confiscate your firearms or haul you to the boxcars, those people who will try are already living and working nearby, whether anyone knows it or not.

 

And on that day of reckoning, each of us in the fight will be tasked to locate and destroy the enemy, whether in hand-to-hand combat or maneuvering and firing from a long range distance, just like any other good infantryman has done for centuries, in their wars for resources and land and freedom and liberty.

 

The Democratic Party has thrown out the rules and they are going for victory by any means necessary, and historically, this always leads to real war every single time. Left unchecked and without more rational and logically thinking people taking the lead in Congress, if any still currently exist, the current trajectory will result in a full blown, red hot and bloody civil war, this year, next year, ten years from now, but it is on the way, sooner rather than later.

 

The anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-freedom Democrats and those aligned with them want the war that’s looming just over the horizon, because they can’t argue their cause by way of facts and they couldn’t win the vote and the electoral college — God Bless James Wilson, James Madison [SEE ALSO  Madison’s Federalist Paper No. X]and the other Founders. And the Dem hubris is such that they believe themselves entitled to rule, even if their only deity is their bellies and whatever collective consciousness passes for their minds.

 

Those who would be King have already destroyed the normal that used to exist, and as such, those of us who would preserve freedom and liberty for America’s Children and Their Children’s Children are left only with the prospect of absolute and total, red hot bloody civil war, because the red, radical Democrat Commies actually believe they can win what they couldn’t win by way of elections. This makes it incumbent upon us to fight no holds barred, measure for measure, and on to victory — ridding the nation of Her enemies from within — to ensure that the forces of Liberty prevail and win the day, and in doing so we pray that something better indeed will arise out of the ashes and the chaos of war.

 

Americans have beaten fanatics, like Antifa and much of the Democratic Party, in my lifetime, but generally it took some hard and decisive actions to get their attention. Nothing has changed in that regard, and those of us who love this America so well are going to have to make them clearly understand that we’re not buying their new worldview, and if they insist on imposing it upon us, we’ll gladly send them to their Maker.

 

By Justin O. Smith

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

______________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All source links and text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

SOMETHING FOUL


Since the Dems are clearly warping Constitutional Intent, creating gutless lies and  fabricating witnesses ex nihilo against President Trump to remove him from Office; this submission from 11/1 is still extremely valid TODAY November 4.

 

JRH 11/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

****************************

SOMETHING FOUL

Democrats: DANGEROUS TO THE REPUBLIC

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 11/1/2019 4:08 PM

 

Something foul has gripped the Democratic Party, and under Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s weak leadership, and prodded on by the despicable fraud and liar known as Representative Adam Schiff, the Democratic Party is weaponizing the process for impeaching a sitting U.S. president, despite the fact that President Donald J. Trump, love him or hate him, has not committed any high crime or misdemeanor. Their unhinged zeal to avenge the 2016 loss and damage Pres. Trump before the 2020 election has them snorting too much gas from imaginary smoking guns fired by people with an agenda, and in their non-linear manner of thinking, they continue their Marxist assault on the Republic, through their own lawless and criminal behavior and a kangaroo court and inquisition.

 

On October 31st, the House Democrats held a vote on a resolution to proceed with an impeachment inquiry, which passed with a vote of 232-196. Two Democrats, Jeff Van Drew (NJ) and Collin Peterson (Minn.) voted against the move, and one time Republican turned Independent, Justin Amash (Mich.) voted in favor of the inquiry.

 

This same day at 10:35 AM, Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Minority Leader in the House, tweeted: 100% of Republicans just voted AGAINST this sham impeachment. Two Democrats joined us. Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Schiff have both insisted that impeachment should be bipartisan. The only bipartisan vote today was AGAINST impeachment.”

 

Representative Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the Intelligence Committee, suggested the Democrats had turned into “a cult”, angrily adding: “We now have a full-fledged impeachment committee in the basement of the Capitol. Think about that, America.”

 

Prior to the vote, Democrats took their proceedings into the basement of the Capitol and conducted closed door hearings for weeks, overseen by the Intelligence Committee, as a justification for their secrecy, and controlled by Adam Schiff in a Soviet style process, when such hearings on impeachment have always been conducted in the Judiciary Committee in the past. Shifty Schiff limited Republican access to witnesses and details discussed and gave Democrats unfettered access to all the proceedings, and he has ignored due process by blocking President Trump’s counsel, creating a substandard process that is dangerous to the presidency and the future of the United States Republic.

 

Under this new resolution, the Democrats are still cutting the President’s counsel out of the hearings in unprecedented fashion and violating the due process that is his right. The President won’t even be able to question any witnesses until the process has long been underway, and, although Republicans can request witness testimony, the Democrats have voted themselves the option of refusing those requests.

 

Much of the Democrats’ supposed evidence of wrongdoing centers on allegations made by Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council staffer, and Eric Ciaramella, a CIA analyst. Both men have reason to oppose President Trump, but not to attack him in such a vicious manner as championing an impeachment process that wreaks of treason and a continued attempt to unseat a duly elected President of the United States.

 

[Blog Editor: On Vindman despite valor in battle:

 

 

 

 

 

When looking at Vindman valor there is something in historical context to look at. Benedict Arnold was one of George Washington’s best generals in the Revolutionary War – until he wasn’t.]

 

Paul Sperry, investigative journalist, notes that Ciaramella is an Obama holdover and a registered Democrat, who has previously worked with Vice-President Joe Biden and CIA Director John Brennan, who played a key role in the long-running soft coup against President Trump. Ciaramella was also removed from his National Security Council posting at the White House in the middle of 2017, due to his breach of the chain of command and numerous anti-Trump leaks to the media. He is also supposedly the “whistle blower”, although Sperry’s account still remains unconfirmed at this point; however, Ciaramella’s name does seem to be on everyone’s lips in D.C. at the moment.

 

[Blog Editor: On Eric Ciaramella’s credibility as any kind of witness against President Trump:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any questions? Dems Lie! The Dems are more concerned about transforming the Republic away from Founding Principles than preserving the Republic. AND Eric Ciaramella is ONLY one example of Dem-Marxist transformationism]

 

In a move the mainstream media saw as an attempt to out the whistle blower, Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX) recently asked a witness about Eric Ciaramella. Later, speaking to a Dallas radio station, Gohmert stated: “A lot of us in Washington know who it is. He’s a very staunch Democrat … a point person on Ukraine, during the time when Ukraine was its most corrupt, and he didn’t blow any whistles on their corruption.”

 

Lt Colonel Vindman was born in Ukraine, and although commendable, receiving a Purple Heart for being wounded in combat, as he was, doesn’t make him a hero whose every word must be taken as the Gospel. It only means he didn’t shirk his duty and he served honorably, as have so many millions of Americans.

 

He had a policy difference with President Trump regarding the country of his birth, and despite all the Democrats’ cries of “the Constitution, the Constitution”, Vindman could care less about any alleged violation of the Constitution by Pres. Trump. The gravamen of his complaint focused on the possibility that $380 million was going to be withheld from Ukraine, if the investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden’s Burisma dealings was pressed, alienating D.C. Democrats from the policy of using Ukraine as a tool against Putin and Russia. Essentially, this is a case of a Ukrainian born analyst butting into U.S. policy to ensure U.S. foreign aid continues flowing into Ukraine without objection.

 

After Schiff announced that the whistle blower might not even testify in a closed session, Republicans noted his motives cannot be properly assessed by the public, if he remains hidden. And Rep. Jim Jordan, head of the House Oversight Committee stated: “It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions.”

 

A former top National Security Council official, Tim Morrison, was on that call between President Trump and President Zelensky of Ukraine on July 25th, and Morrison states: “I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.”

 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters on October 30th, the following: “I heard the President very clearly on that call talking about making sure that corruption — whether that corruption took place in the 2016 election, whether that corruption was continuing to take place, that the monies that were being provided would be used appropriately. It was very consistent with what I’d understood President Trump and our administration to be doing all along.”

 

Aid to Ukraine was not withheld and most of the criticism is political opportunism from Democrats, who cared little about Ukraine, until Hillary lost the Big Brass Ring and the ticket to the White House. Trump’s only sin was not requesting anti-corruption assistance through proper channels, because Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma Holdings, while Ol’ Joe was Vice-President of the United States, is a legitimate priority for U.S. and Ukrainian anti-corruption investigations. The Biden’s activities shouldn’t be swept under the rug due to the embarrassment or criminal charges for bribery it may bring some people.

 

President Trump blurred the line between U.S. national interests and his own personal and political interests a little, but even taking the worst-case scenario on Ukraine — a quid pro quo exchange of foreign aid for political favor — political sin or not, it certainly doesn’t arise to the level of a crime or an impeachable offense.

 

Any normal decent American fully understands that this is an UGLY and DANGEROUS gambit to undo the 2016 election and throw the 2020 election into turmoil, due to the Democratic Party’s realization that they will not be able to beat President Trump in a FAIR ELECTION PROCESS.

 

Steaming ahead like an out-of-control train, the Democrats are ignoring the common law definition and the Founders’ understanding of the limited and technical meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors” centered around abuse of power and grave breaches of trust and the Founders’ rejection of “maladministration”. They are attempting to impeach the president, despite the absence of impeachable offenses, and they are trying to neutralize and destroy President Trump, through a list of alleged impeachable offenses that they change each time one fails to produce the desired results: In the process, they are seeking to exercise control over the president that is not authorized in the Constitution and strictly forbidden by the Framers of the Constitution, since in the absence of any real and specified criminal conduct, the only legitimate remedy for a non-impeachable president lies with the voters, not Congress.

 

By Justin O. Smith

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Suddfluffel Chain, Dem Impeachment & Senate Trial – Oh My!


John R. Houk

© November 3, 2019

A good Facebook friend shared a purported article by a “Hyram F. Suddfluffel”. At first I didn’t pay attention to the name and just went on to read. As a Trump supporter who whole-heartedly believes the Dems and the MSM are fabricating excuses (Note “excuses” because there is not one crime pointed to, merely politically charged excuses that Dems have been committing against Conservatives for decades) to impeach President Trump, the read brings an aura of excitement that impeachment will lead to a Senate trial that will lead to Dem indictments rather than a Trump removal.

 

My exuberance was so high I then went back to the attributed author’s name which is “Suddfluffel”. That’s when I realized this was more than likely an inventive chain (aka chain mail, chain email, chain message, etc.). Whoever the inventive author actually is even tried to add a sense of bona fides by placing “PhD” and in parentheses “Political Science”.

 

So I Googled, Duck Duck Goed and StartPage.comed “Hyram F. Suddfluffel”. Of course Left-Wing Snopes that castigates all things Conservative comes up first, flowed closely by an article in The American Spectator and Heavy.com.

 

I can give Leftie Snopes credit for not going to the “False” label but rather going with “Unproven” likely because no Suddfluffel author can be found even as a pseudonym.

 

The American Spectator implies the subpoenaing of lying Deep Staters is possible in the Republican controlled Senate especially if those liars have anything to do with Dem approved articles of Impeachment.

 

Heavy.com examines the Suddfluffel online pedigree and history of past Senate rules and procedures of Senate removal trials of President Andrew Johnson and Slick Willie (Bill) Clinton. And to me those procedures and rules managed by a Republican Majority Senate could quite probably spank wicked Dems.

 

A point of interest I did discover search engines the existence of a Hiram College webpage emphasizing a Political Science undergrad program. Could a clever student or Professor wanting to keep their Conservative leanings anonymous have come that institution of higher learning? Hmm…

 

So, in my cross posting fervor, I will begin with R.R. Brown’s Facebook Messenger share, followed excerpts the American Spectator and Heavy.com minus any reposted versions of the mysterious Hyram F. Suddfluffel. (Snopes bias is annoying to me, you’ll to visit the Leftist website to get their slant on Suddfluffel.)

 

JRH 11/3/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

  

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

****************************

Shared by Rose Reed Brown

From Facebook Messenger

October 31, 2019 10:05 PM

Interesting Read…

LET THEM GO AHEAD AND IMPEACH TRUMP … HERE’S WHAT HAPPENS THEN…… CHUGGA CHUGGA CHOO CHOO

By: Hyram F. Suddfluffel, PhD, (Political Science)

I have a degree in Political Science, and I am a card-carrying Libertarian. I’ve been studying politics and political history for the past 30 years. My specialty is U.S. Presidents. That said, I hope that the House of Representatives impeaches Trump. Let me tell you what will happen next!

1. The House can pass articles of impeachment over the objections of the Republicans and refer to the Senate for trial.

2. The Senate will conduct a trial. There will be a vote, and the Republicans will vote unanimously, along with a small number of Democrats, to not convict the President. Legally, it will all be over at that point.

3. However, during the trial, and this is what no one is thinking about right now, the President’s attorneys will have the right to subpoena and
question ANYONE THEY WANT! That is different than the special counsel investigation, which was very one-sided. So, during the impeachment trial, we will be hearing testimony from James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Glenn Simpson, Donna Brazille, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Christopher Steele, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, and a whole host of other participants in this whole sordid affair and the ensuing coverup activities. A lot of dirt will be dug up; a lot of truth will be unveiled. Finger pointing will occur. Deals will start being made, and suddenly, a lot of democrats will start being charged and going to prison. All this, because, remember, the President’s team will now, for the first time, have the RIGHT to question all of these people under oath – and they will turn on each other. That is already starting.

4. Lastly, one more thing will happen, the Senate will not convict the President. Nothing will happen to Trump. Most Americans are clueless about political processes, the law, and the Constitution. Most Americans believe that being impeached results in removal from office. They don’t understand that phase 2 is a trial in and by the Senate, where he has zero chance of conviction. Remember, the Senate is controlled by Republicans; they will determine what testimony is allowed — and everything will be allowed, including: DNC collusion with the Clinton campaign to fix the election in favor of Hillary, the creation of the Trump dossier, the cover up and destruction of emails that very likely included incriminating information. They will incriminate each other for lying to the FISA court, for spying and wiretapping the Trump campaign, and for colluding with foreign political actors, especially George Soros. After the Senate declines to convict the President, we will have an election, and Trump will win. It will be a backlash against democrat petulance, temper tantrums, hypocrisy and dishonesty. Even minorities will vote for Trump, because, for the first time, they will see that democrats have spent 2+ years focused on maintaining their own power, and not doing anything at all about black murders in Chicago, homelessness, opioids, and other important issues that are actually killing people. And, we will spend the following four years listening to politicians and pundits claim that the whole impeachment was rigged.

So let’s move on to impeachment.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Absolutely, Let’s Have an Impeachment Trial

The House should vote to impeach President Trump and the Senate should start a trial — so the REAL fireworks can begin.

 

Donald Trump Speaking – TAS YouTube screenshot

 

By SCOTT MCKAY

October 1, 2019, 12:57 PM

The American Spectator

 

There is an email/social media post, bearing the delightful nom de plume of “Hyram F. Suddfluffel,” going around the internet at present, one which is pretty timely and quite well reasoned and which might make you rethink your preconceived notions about how much resistance we should all have to the Democrats’ impeachment madness.

 

At least, until the process gets to the Senate.

 

Here’s the email, cribbed in full so as to do it justice:

 

 

This thing has become such an underground sensation that Snopes has even weighed in, claiming that it’s “unproven.”

 

No kidding.

 

Snopes writer Dan MacGuill, whose nom de plume is nowhere near as colorful as Hyram F. Suddfluffel, claims that the email’s conclusion that a two-thirds vote for impeachment in the Senate is impossible is “exaggerated,” but he concedes most of the rest of the premise to be realistic.

 

But he argues it nonetheless. For example, MacGuill quibbles with the idea that Trump could call any witness he wants during an impeachment trial while conceding that the “Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment Trials” does include a formula of words for subpoenas in such trials, specifying that the subpoena can be issued on behalf of “the party impeached, or of his counsel.” He says that doesn’t mean an unlimited exposure to subpoena, as some of those potential subpoenas could be quashed by a federal court.

 

News flash: none of the people Trump is likely to call as witnesses in an impeachment trial are going to have their subpoenas quashed as irrelevant to the bill of particulars brought to the Senate by a House impeachment. The clowns in charge of the impeachment show in the House will make sure that’s true by throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Trump in the impeachment. And therefore all of the past three years will be relevant to the case — James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, Ben Rhodes, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, James Comey … we can go on and on about the Democrat and Deep State conspirators who came together in an attempt to derail and overturn the legitimate results of an American election under the guise of saving democracy from untoward meddling from foreign powers colluding with bad actors here.

 

They’re all fair game, and they’ll all go under oath to be cross-examined without end by the best trial lawyers money can buy — with the unlimited resources of the White House and the executive branch generating evidence to support and direct those questions.

 

And with the Senate Republicans in charge of the trial.

 

Does this sound at all like an environment Democrats believe will benefit them?

 

Increasingly it’s apparent the Democrat party isn’t very good at thinking through their actions before uncorking them. That’s precisely what impeachment, which plays exceptionally badly with people in red, purple, and light-blue states, is an example of.

 

Consider your author at least a half-serious proponent of the theory that what’s really at stake here isn’t a Democratic coup against the president, but rather a hard-left coup against Joe Biden within the Democrat party. Biden, whose dealings on behalf of his ne’er-do-well son in Ukraine and elsewhere cannot escape the steamroller an in-depth investigation of the Ukraine matter would become, would be finished, once again, as a presidential candidate. When he is, there would be no further old-school center-left leadership in that party, and the socialist crowd would inherit its ashes. Impeachment means Elizabeth Warren as the 2020 nominee and virtually certain defeat. And not just in the presidential election: the House would return to the GOP, and Nancy Pelosi, who is the captive queen of Capitol Hill, would be through.

 

But in 2024, the Democrats would become the Socialists, and a fresh new avatar of the Hard Left would be cut from whole cloth just as Barack Obama was. And should that candidate win election thanks to indoctrinated millennials and Generation Y-ers, the Hard Left believes, the long project to convert this country from the Land of the Free to the Home of the Tax Slave would be complete.

 

It’s hardly set in stone that this is our future. And it’s just a theory. But it’s as plausible as the idea the Democrats really are so arrogant that they think they can convince two-thirds of the Senate to vote to remove a duly elected president on accusations that, at worst, are a shadowy reflection of conduct their own people engaged in during the previous administration.

 

Scott McKay is publisher of the Hayride, which offers news and commentary on Louisiana and national politics. He’s also a novelist — check out his first book “Animus: A Tale of Ardenia,” available in Kindle and paperback.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Hyram F. Suddfluffel: The Origin & What’s True about the Viral Impeachment Post

 

By Stephanie Dube Dwilson

Updated Sep 26, 2019 at 12:46am

Heavy.com

 

US President Donald Trump claps during a campaign rally in Rio Rancho, New Mexico – Getty Photo

 

A post from several months ago claiming to be from “Hyram F. Suddfluffel” about President Donald Trump’s impeachment is making the rounds on social media again. And as a result, a lot of people are searching for Suddfluffel on Snopes. Is Suddfluffel real? What’s the post’s origins? Interestingly, the post that claims Trump is playing a version of 4D chess with the impeachment first made the rounds back in June before it started making the rounds again in the last couple of days. The earliest signs that Heavy can find of that post didn’t show the Suddfluffel name attached. Read on to learn more about the post’s origins and what’s true and what’s not.

 

Early Versions of the Suddfluffel Post from June Didn’t Have the Name Attached

 

No one has ever officially come forward claiming to be the person who wrote the Hyram F. Suddfluffel post, and searches for Hyram F. Suddfluffel came up empty. Although there some elements in the impeachment post itself that are accurate regarding Trump’s chances of being impeached and some procedures, other elements are not. And an actual person named Hyram F. Suddfluffel cannot be verified. In fact, the earliest signs of this post didn’t have a name attached to it.

 

Here’s what the long post making the rounds says. Not everything in this is factual, but some points are.

 

The earliest version of this post showing up on an Internet search, Facebook, or Twitter is on a Freepublic discussion here. It was posted verbatim on June 3, 2019 with the subject line: “Come on Trump haters, PUSH for impeachment ‘PLEASE.’” The post was shared by contributer lonster who said “This was passed on by an old friend.” The name Suddfluffel did not appear.

 

Free Republic Screen Shot of ‘Impeachment Dam Breaking’

 

Later on that same day, someone else referenced the post as coming from lonster on Freepublic.

 

Impeachment screen-shot- Accredited to FReeper Lonster

 

Lonster very well may have gotten the copy from another source, but searches for the copy in that post showing up anywhere else on Google prior to that June 3 date came up empty. (Note: Below is just an example of one attempt to search the copy.)

 

screen-shot-Google Search Prior 6/3/19 Comes Up Empty

 

The note quickly started making the rounds at this point. You can see one person sharing pieces of it on Twitter on June 16, 2019.

 

 

Interestingly, searches on Duck Duck Go pulled up more information than Google searches. But the results date-wise are the same. Blogs began posting the same story in June frequently, and then it died down until the last couple of days when impeachment news started surfacing again. For example, Fergus Falls Journal just shared the post again in Letters to the Editor, submitted by Bill Schulz but quoting Suddfluffel.

 

The name Hyram appears to start showing up in late June, so it was connected to the post pretty quickly, although not widely used until August.

 

screen-shot- Suddfluffel Shows Up Late June

 

The post was also shared on 4 Chan’s /pol/ on June 18, 2019, and the poster at the time was “Anonymous” and they did not include the Hyram name with the post.

 

screen-shot of 4-Chan Hyram Suddfluffel version

 

The post also showed up on June 12 on Government in Exile without the name. By June 16, it was already making the rounds on Facebook and being shared on forums from Facebook posts. The June 16 post noted that the story was seen on a comment on a Wall Street Journal article. Subsequent searches showed the post has appeared frequently as a comment on news articles, which has probably helped it spread so fast.

 

Although the exact origin isn’t known, the long comment appears to have first shown up in early June 2019 and did not have the Hyram name attached in the earliest iterations. This article will be updated if earlier versions of the comment are discovered in subsequent searches.

 

Is Anything in the Content of the Post True?

 

Interestingly, some things in the content of the post are true, but certainly not everything (including some of the more conspiracy-theory-sounding notes.) But certain comments about procedures, for example, are true. The House can pass articles of impeachment over the objections of Republicans.

 

If all 435 House members vote, they would need 218 votes for a majority to be reached and for Trump to be impeachedThere are 235 Democrats in office in the House, one Independent, and 199 Republicans, Reuters explained. This means that it wouldn’t be too difficult to get those impeachment votes simply from Democrats alone. But like the post says, an impeachment does not mean removal.

 

The post is also correct in that the Senate would conduct a trial and, most likely, Republicans would not convict Trump. A 2/3 majority is needed in the Senate after the trial in order to remove a sitting President. In Trump’s case, a total of 67 Senators would need to vote to convict and remove the President. There are 45 Democrat Senators and 53 Republican Senators, plus two Independents who typically vote Democrat. So to reach the 67 total needed to remove Trump, they would need at least 20 Republicans to join with Democrats in voting to remove Trump (plus the two Independents), Reuters reported. This is unlikely to happen, although not impossible. If Trump is not convicted then he would be considered acquitted and would continue his term and could run again.

 

It’s also unlikely that anyone could be subpoenaed about anything. There isn’t a lot of precedent for Presidential impeachment trials. The most recent Senate impeachment trial involved Bill Clinton (and before him, Andrew Johnson), so Clinton’s trial can be reviewed for the most recent precedent and examples.

 

Rules for Senate impeachment trials can be read here. The 1868 rules are here. The Senate formulated its trial procedures and then-Vice President Thomas Jefferson wrote them down, and then additional rules were added by the Senate during Johnson’s trial, Heritage noted. Those rules were largely followed during Clinton’s trial.

 

The rules mention that subpoenas (spelled subpena in the document), would call people to testify their knowledge regarding the cause before the Senate.

 

In Clinton’s Senate trial, the Senators voted on procedural rules that would govern the trial, how many hours each side would have to present its case, and the like. They decided not to call live witnesses for Clinton’s trial, but instead showed video testimony. Senators debated their votes behind closed doors.

 

Interestingly, Heritage pointed out that the Chief Justice sometimes makes procedural rulings. In 1868, the Senate overruled the Chief Justice’s procedural rulings. In Clinton’s trial, the Senate never challenged the Chief Justice’s procedural rulings.

 

The Washington Post had an interesting article noting that Mitch McConnell, as the Senate Majority Leader, would have a lot of influence over the trial. The article posits that rules against hearsay evidence could be ignored if desired and the Chief Justice’s rulings overruled (as happened in Johnson’s trial.) McConnell might seek to have Joe Biden and Hunter Biden as live witnesses, for example, and they might look into Biden’s alleged actions in the Ukraine too. There also might be a lot of leeway in determining what would count as exculpatory evidence and, thus, necessary subpoenas to defend Trump.

 

In summary, Hyram F. Suddfluffel’s identity can’t be authenticated or verified, and the earliest examples of this post that’s circulating don’t include his name. There’s no evidence that Trump actually wants the impeachment or somehow planned for it to happen. There is quite a lot of reason, however, to imagine that Republican Senators likely would not vote for Trump’s removal. If more information about the post’s origins are found, this story will be updated.

+++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________

Suddfluffel Chain, Dem Impeachment & Senate Trial – Oh My!

John R. Houk

© November 3, 2019

_________________________

Absolutely, Let’s Have an Impeachment Trial

 

The American Spectator Homepage

 

About

 

The American Spectator was founded in 1924  by George Nathan and Truman Newberry over a cheap domestic ale in McSorley’s Old Ale House. In 1967, the Saturday Evening Club took it over, rechristening it The Alternative: An American Spectator, but by November 1977 the word “alternative” had acquired such an esoteric fragrance that in order to discourage unsolicited manuscripts from florists, beauticians, and other creative types, the club reverted to the magazine’s original name. Published remarkably without regard to gender, lifestyle, race, color, creed, physical handicap, or national origin.

 

The American Spectator Foundation educates the public on new ideas, concepts, and policies that favor traditional American values, such as economic freedom, individual liberty, self-sufficiency, and limited government.  To this end, the Foundation also trains and cultivates young writers for careers in journalism and serves as an outlet for a host of both young and established conservative writers and thinkers.

_____________________

Hyram F. Suddfluffel: The Origin & What’s True about the Viral Impeachment Post

 

Copyright © 2019 Heavy, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

About Heavy

 

Heavy Inc. is a privately held U.S.-based digital media company that owns and operates Heavy.com and Ahoramismo.com.

 

Heavy.com is a real-time news and information platform visited by 25 million unique visitors per month. Heavy.com is overseen by Editor-in-Chief Aaron Nobel. Heavy’s rapid reporting and user-friendly formats provide timely coverage of breaking news, sports, entertainment and consumer trends.

 

Heavy’s Gift and Shopping Guides provide 16 million shoppers a year with information to assist them in making the right buying decision at the time of purchase. Heavy’s entertainment guides help 2 million readers per year determine “what to watch” in a world of proliferating streaming content options.

 

Heavy’s goal is to provide our community with satisfying, accurate and actionable information to enhance their day-to-day lives.

 

Ahoramismo.com is Heavy’s Spanish language platform reaching 2 million unique visitors per month.

 

Toss the Coup Dem Bums Out of Office November 2020


John R. Houk

© November 2, 2018

 

Information about House Resolution 660, the so-called Impeachment Inquiry resolution with unprecedented restrictions on GOP cross examination:

 

H RES 660      YEA-AND-NAY      31-Oct-2019      11:19 AM

 

YEAS NAYS PRES NV
DEMOCRATIC 230 2 1
REPUBLICAN 194 3
INDEPENDENT 1
TOTALS 231 196   4

 

If you are a Trump supporter that recognizes the only reason for this impeachment is the Dems don’t like him, PAY ATTENTION TO THE DEM REPRESENTATIVE THAT ALLEGEDLY REPRESENTS YOU AND SUPPOSEDLY SUPPORTS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION! NO CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED by President Trump.

 

The Dems are telling the Leftist Media propaganda machines and their constituents they are being more transparent than past House Impeachment investigations. IT’S A FREAKING DEM LIE with MSM collusion!

 

From Breitbart, here are some restrictions Republicans face in the Dem LIE of transparency:

 

  • The resolution gives authority to the House Intelligence Committee that it has never had before.

 

  • The resolution does not provide the Republican minority equal subpoena power.

 

  • The resolution dilutes minority powers over the release of Intelligence Committee transcripts.

 

  • The resolution does not compel the release of past testimony.

 

  • The resolution restricts the president’s right to be represented.

 

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ), a House Freedom Caucus member, said this “resolution for a sham impeachment process is a farce.”

 

This resolution for a sham impeachment process is a farce:

– Transcripts aren’t required to be made public
– Exculpatory evidence does not have to be turned over

Democrats are misleading the public once again. This does not open up the process, nor does it provide transparency. (House Democrats Pass Partisan Impeachment Process Resolution in Face of Bipartisan Opposition; By SEAN MORAN; Breitbart; 10/31/19)

 

Here the Dems participating in a coup against a Constitutionally elected President Donald Trump:

 

—- YEAS    231 — [Dems in bold-italics-underline-dark red could be 2020 close elections]

 

 

Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Amash
Axne
Barragán
Bass
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Boyle, Brendan F.
Brindisi
Brown (MD)
Brownley (CA)
Cheri Bustos
Butterfield
Carbajal
Cárdenas
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Case
Casten (IL)
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu, Judy
Cicilline
Cisneros
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Cooper
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Cox (CA)
Craig
Crist
Crow
Cuellar
Cunningham
Davids (KS)
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny K.
Dean
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Delgado
Demings
DeSaulnier
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle, Michael F.
Engel
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Finkenauer
Fletcher
Foster
Frankel
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
García (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Golden
Gomez
Gonzalez (TX)
Gottheimer
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Haaland
Harder (CA)
Hastings
Hayes
Heck
Higgins (NY)
Hill (CA)
Himes
Horn, Kendra S.
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Huffman
Jackson Lee
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster (NH)
Lamb
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lawrence
Lawson (FL)
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Levin (CA)
Levin (MI)
Lewis
Lieu, Ted
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Luján
Luria
Lynch
Malinowski
Maloney, Carolyn B.
Maloney, Sean
Matsui
McAdams
Lucy McBath
McCollum
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Moore
Morelle
Moulton
Mucarsel-Powell
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Tom O’Halloran
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Perlmutter
Peters
Phillips
Pingree
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Price (NC)
Quigley
Raskin
Rice (NY)
Richmond
Rose (NY)
Rouda
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan
Sánchez
Sarbanes
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Shalala
Sherman
Sherrill
Sires
Slotkin
Smith (WA)
Soto
Spanberger
Speier
Stanton
Stevens
Suozzi
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres Small (NM)
Trahan
Trone
Lauren Underwood
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velázquez
Visclosky
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Welch
Wexton
Wild
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
     

 

I found a list of 29 Dems that won their District in 2018 but President Trump had won in 2016. Some of these Dems won handily with the incumbent card and some with a thin victory. BUT Trump won in all their Districts either thinly or substantially in 2016. I noticed on the Ingraham Angle a list of 31 Dems (about the 6:30 mark) who might pay the price of voting for an UNFAIR Impeachment Inquiry. My list was garnered from The Hill on a March 15, 2019 looking at past close elections. Two Dems on The Hill post voted NAY on the Halloween HR 660 Impeachment Inquiry. If you reside in an elected Dem’s District from the above 230 coup voters you should vote that person out of Office. ESPECIALLY if you reside in one of the 29 below where your vote has real power to toss the bums OUT!

 

  1. Tom O’Halloran – AZ-01 
  2. Cheri Bustos – IL-17
  3. Lucy McBath – GA-06

 

  1. Lauren Underwood – IL-14

 

  1. Abby Finkenauer – IA-01

 

  1. Dave Loebsack – IA-02

 

  1. Cindy Axne – IA-03

 

  1. Jared Golden – ME-02

 

  1. Elissa Slotkin – MI-08

 

  1. Haley Stevens – MI-11

 

  1. Angie Craig – MN-02

 

  1. Susie Lee – NV-03

 

  1. Chris Pappas – NH-01

 

  1. Andy Kim – NJ-03

 

  1. Josh Gottheimer – NJ-05

 

  1. Mikie Sherrill – NJ-11

 

  1. Xochitl Torres Small  – NM-02

 

  1. Max Rose – NY-11

 

  1. Sean Maloney – NY-18

 

  1. Antonio Delgado – NY-19

 

  1. Anthony Brindisi – NY-22

 

  1. Kendra Horn – OK-05

 

  1. Matt Cartwright – PA-08

 

  1. Conor Lamb – PA-17

 

  1. Joe Cunningham – SC-01

 

  1. Ben McAdams – UT-04

 

  1. Elaine Luria – VA-02

 

  1. Abigail Spanberger – VA-07

 

  1. Ron Kind – WI-03

 

JRH 11/2/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

NEW Benghazi Email CONFIRMS Clinton Email Scandal Cover-Up by State Department!


Dem Party Deep State Boot AGAINST Prez Trump

You need to think about this! Donald Trump has been President for three years AND there are still people in the Trump Administration covering up crimes in the Obama Administration. The four minute video you are about to watch is about Deep Staters in the State Department, but the same obfuscation is still going on in the DOJ with the FBI led by Trump appointee Christopher Wray coming to mind STILL hiding and/or stalling information implicating Obama Administration wrong doing. DEAR GOD – you can also add ALL the U.S. Intel agencies either covering for Obama or actively fabricating actions against President Trump.

 

My fellow Americans, LET’S MAKE IT STOP!

 

JRH 10/30/19 (H/T Vlad Tepes)

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

  

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

*******************************

VIDEO: NEW Benghazi Email CONFIRMS Clinton Email Scandal Cover-Up by State Department!

 

 

Posted by Judicial Watch

285K subscribers – Oct 29, 2019

 

Judicial Watch released new Clinton emails on the Benghazi controversy that had been covered up for years and would have exposed Hillary Clinton’s email account if they had been released when the State Department first uncovered them in 2014. The long withheld email, clearly responsive to Judicial Watch’s lawsuit seeking records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack,” contains Clinton’s private email address and a conversation about the YouTube video that sparked the Benghazi talking points scandal (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)).

 

READ MORE: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-documents-confirm-clinton-email-cover-up/

 

Donate today! ► https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/thank-youtube/

 

Subscribe on YouTube! ► http://jwatch.us/subscribe

 

Check out our website ► http://www.judicialwatch.org

 

MORE TO READ