Russia Hacked Emails like a Movie Caused Benghazi


lying-crooked-hillary

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

 

Is it illegal to hack an individual’s email account? YES! Is it illegal to hack government email accounts? YES! Is it illegal for government employees to conduct government business on a private email or private server? YES! Is Wikileaks reprehensible if their organization is involved in any illegal hacking whatsoever – which would be illegal? YES!

 

Did Russia hack the Democratic Party emails? THERE IS NO PROOF, other than the words of the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party!

 

These are the same people who told America in 2012 that the Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack that killed FOUR Americans was the result of an obscure Youtube Movie trailer. That was a lie fabricated to make sure Barack Hussein Obama was reelected. It was a cover-up in part to make Obama/Crooked Hillary Foreign Policy and Clandestine decisions to make them appear competent rather than inept.

 

Crooked Hillary claimed in the third Presidential Debate that SIXTEEN American Intelligence organizations pointed their fingers at Russia and Putin as the definite hackers of the Dem National Committee emails. I have to ask, “Which vague 16 Intelligence organizations claim that Russia is responsible for the hacking?”

 

I gotta tell you. Crooked Hillary’s condescending and vague accusation against Russia to make Donald Trump look nefarious brought me back to the Benghazi Lies of 2012. At this point the difference Crooked Hillary’s accusation is probably a Benghazi-like lie. A LIE TO GET ELECTED President of the United States!

 

These Leftist Dems will say anything to get elected to any Office.

 

It has come my attention a former British Ambassador – Craig Murray – that lost his British diplomatic job with the UK government for “exposing the UK government’s knowing use of intelligence obtained from suspects who had been tortured by the Uzbekistan Government,” is vouching for Wikileaks that the hacked emails did NOT COME from Russia. AGAIN! The Dems are lying to win the election. The Dem lie has the complete cooperation of America’s Left Stream Media who are not focusing on the Wikileaks exposing just how nefarious Crooked Hillary and the Dems truly are.

 

My fellow American voters, DO YOU WANT CROOKED HILLARY TO BE POTUS KNOWING SHE AND HER DEMS ARE THIS CORRUPT? REALLY?

 

Everything Crooked Hillary says she will do to benefit Americans at worst is a nefarious evil lie with another agenda she desires to be hidden. At best whatever Crooked Hillary speaks to Americans is well-meaning deception to bring America into a disastrous transformed Leftist utopia that tears up EVERYTHING the Founding Fathers put on paper that would lead America to become great.

 

MY GOD DEAR VOTERS – VOTE TRUMP TO GIVE AMERICA A CHANCE!

 

Below is the Constitution.com article about Craig Murray denying the Dem-line that Russia is behind the hacking thorn in Crooked Hillary’s side.

 

JRH 10/22/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

By Onan Coca

October 21, 2016

Constitution.com

 

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is an ally and friend of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and he visited Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy on Wednesday to discuss his ongoing plight. What Murray learned could have a huge impact on the 2016 election, if the American people are allowed to hear it.

 

One of the main media arguments for people not to give credence to the hacked DNC, Clinton emails is that this is a deliberate attempt by Vladimir Putin and Russia to impact our electoral process. The narrative goes something like this; ‘Russia illegally hacked the DNC and are now trying to steal the election from Clinton. So Republicans shouldn’t use the ill-gotten information, the media shouldn’t report on it, and the American people shouldn’t pay attention to it. In that way, we’ll be standing up to the tinpot dictator Putin.’ The only problem with this is that it means we should all completely ignore the criminality and corruption at the DNC and in the Clinton campaign team! It’s a stupid argument, but it’s become so prevalent that even some conservatives are parroting it.

 

WATCHING WIKILEAKS

 

VIDEO: Breaking British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks – The Constitution [ORIGINALLY LIFEZETTE]

 

Here’s the thing… there’s no proof that Russia did any of this. They’ve never admitted to it, and our intelligence community has never proven it. It’s simply a theory that the media and the Clinton team have implied is fact.

 

Well, Ambassador Murray is here to dispel the rumors and to clear the air. Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with hacks on the Democrats, nor with the release of the hacked emails.

 

Here’s what Ambassador Murray had to say from his personal website:

 

I left Julian after midnight. He is fit, well, sharp and in good spirits. WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks. The claim is nonsense. Journalists are also publishing that these were obtained by “hacking” with no evidence that this was the method used to obtain them.

 

The control of the Democratic party machinery deliberately to unfairly ensure Clinton’s victory over Bernie Sanders is a matter of great public interest. The attempt by the establishment from Obama down to divert attention from this by a completely spurious claim against Russia, repeated without investigation by a servile media, is a disgrace.

 

The over-close relationship between the probable future President and Wall Street is also very important. WikiLeaks has done a great public service by making this plain.

 

The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic.

 

But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material.

 

Did you get that?

 

  • Russia did not get/give WikiLeaks any of the leaked emails/data.

 

  • The media says the info was “hacked,” but WikiLeaks has never said that the information was gathered in that manner. Meaning, it could have been leaked by a whistleblower.

 

  • The same people who “stole” the Democrat nomination from Bernie Sanders are now trying to shift attention from their corruption to Russia.

 

  • Obama and the media are complicit in both the corruption and the cover up of the corruption.

 

  • WikiLeaks doesn’t have a “dog in the fight;” they simply publish the information that is given to them by whistleblowers.

 

Ladies and gentlemen, please don’t buy the media/establishment spin on the WikiLeaks releases. This isn’t about Russia, or hacking, or anything like that –

 

This is all about how the Democrat Party is corrupt, anti-democratic, and very likely criminal.

 

This is all about how the media has been complicit, not only in the crimes of the Democrat Party, but in covering up their crimes as well.

 

This is all about how liberals will literally do whatever it takes to win. In their minds the ends always justify whatever dastardly means must be employed to ensure victory.

 

This is all about how the American people continue to have their rights stripped away from them by a bloated and corrupt government.

 

Don’t let them get away with it.

 

_________________

Russia Hacked Emails like a Movie Caused Benghazi

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

_________________

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

Onan Coca

 

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Liberty Alliance media group. He’s also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

 

Copyright © 2016 The Constitution. All Rights Reserved. 

 

A Frightening Preview of Hillary’s America


crooked-hillary

The David Horowitz Freedom Center sent a for insightful essay by Daniel Greenfield that demonstrates what life probably will be like in Crooked Hillary’s America.

 

The essay is not linked, but I’m confident a simple Google search would find many locations for the essay.

 

JRH 10/20/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

A Frightening Preview of Hillary’s America 

Dark and unaccountable

 

By Daniel Greenfield

Dated: October 20, 2016

Sent: 10/21/2016 8:00 AM

Sent by: David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Hillary Clinton, of all people, summed up this debate and this election best.

“What kind of country are we going to be?”

The Evita of Arkansas is a compulsive liar who has never told the truth in her life. But this time around she was right. This election does not come down to the personalities. It comes down to the kind of country we are going to have. And in the third debate, the one that took a break from the petty haranguing of media lackeys like Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz, the issues took center stage.

The core issue came into focus with the very first question asked by Chris Wallace. Wallace asked Hillary and Trump if their vision for the Supreme Court was based on the Constitution or not. Hillary launched into a spiel about a Supreme Court that would stand for class warfare and gay rights. The only time she mentioned the Constitution was when she insisted that the Senate was constitutionally obligated to confirm Obama’s nominee. That is her vision of the Constitution; a document that grants her power to reshape the country without regard to the Founders or any previously existing rights or freedoms.

It fell to Trump to speak of justices who would “interpret the Constitution the way the founders wanted it interpreted”. And that is the core issue. Personalities and politicians come and go. Today’s trending topic has been forgotten a day later. Outrages explode like fireworks and then fizzle out.

The weapons of mass distraction have been deployed and detonated. They keep going off in blasts of media gunpowder to divert our attention from whether we will live under the Constitution or under the Hillary. Will we have the rights and freedom bound into the Constitution or corruption justified with cant about the need to defend the oppressed by giving unlimited power to the oppressors.

The final debate finally focused on the issues. Instead of leading with the scandals, it asked about gun control, amnesty and open borders. It asked what kind of country are we going to be?

And, are we going to be a country at all or an open border weeping undocumented migrants destroying what’s left of the middle class as the masterminds rob the country blind while preaching piously to us about all the poor Syrians, Mexicans and LGBT youth they want to protect?

Americans have had a preview of the country that Hillary Clinton would create under Obama. They received yet another preview of it at a final debate in which Hillary echoed Obama’s Orwellian language in which endless spending was dubbed “investing” and in which government would save the middle class by regulating and taxing it out of existence for the greater good of the officially oppressed.

Hillary Clinton promised free college and cradle to grave education that would be debt free. Americans would be the ones plummeting deeper and deeper into debt to pay for degrees in gender studies. She promised viewers pie in the sky to be paid for by higher taxes on the rich. But as Trump pointed out, that’s the class that her donors come from. Did Warren Buffett and George Soros invest all that money into her victory just to pay higher taxes? Did they do it right after they bought the Brooklyn Bridge?

Or will Americans buy the bridge believing Hillary’s promise that she “will not add a penny to the debt”?

The only way Hillary can hope to do that is to appoint Bernie Madoff to be her Treasury Secretary.

When Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump wrangled over tax hikes or tax cuts, the debate is whether crooks like the Clintons should have a massive pot of taxpayer money to “invest” into their donors.

But beneath it is the same big question; do we live under the Constitution or under the Hillary?

In Hillary Country, just like in Obama Country, there are always more “investments” to make and you had better pay your “fair share”. There are always special identity group interests that need money. There are always more regulations, taxes, fines and fees. And it’s all for the children.

The ones that Hillary will grimace at when the cameras are on her and nudge away with the point of her shoe when the little red light turns off.

But there is no lie that Hillary Clinton will not tell and no lie that her pet media fact checkers will not back her up on. Obama doubled the national debt and yet Hillary insists that, “We’re actually on the path to eliminating the national debt”. That might be true only insofar as we’re approaching the point that no one will lend us any money. We’re headed toward a $20 trillion national debt.

And Hillary’s plans won’t add a penny to the national debt. They’ll add hundreds of trillions of pennies.

Hillary talked of bringing “our country together” and not “pitting of people one against the other” and instead “we celebrate our diversity”. If she does half as good a job as Obama, these celebrations of diversity will climax with race riots across America. How exactly does Hillary plan to unite with the “deplorables” of the country? How has Hillary united anyone in the country except in disdain?

Hillary Clinton’s entire campaign pitch is based on demonizing Trump and his supporters. She believes that if she convinces enough voters that Trump is the devil, they may hold their noses and accept the return of the corrupt Clinton dynasty and everything that it represents. That gamble is what we are seeing on the news. It is what we heard at the debate. Hillary cannot win on her own merits.

She warned at the final debate of the “dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system”. It’s hard to imagine a bigger source of dark, accountable money than a foundation being used as an international slush fund that has been beyond unaccountable.

But it’s Hillary’s vision of government that is dark and unaccountable. From the beginning of the debate, she made it clear that she does not wish to be accountable to the Constitution. Her email cover up made it painfully clear that she does not want to be accountable to the American people. Instead Hillary would like everyone in the country to be accountable to her. A mass of regulations and enforcers will force everyone to be accountable to the dark and unaccountable force in the White House.

“It really does come down to what kind of country we are going to have,” Hillary repeated.

It does indeed. Americans have had a preview of the kind of country that Hillary would bring into being.

 

________________

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

 

DONATE to DH Freedom Center

 

About David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

OUR MISSION: The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

VIDEO: Our Mission – Updated June 2013

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is READ THE REST

 

Decision 2016: A Guide for Hillary & Trump Voters


whos-with-crooked-hillary-screen-capture

Yesterday I posted on Donald Trump’s assertion that he would wait and see before making any commitment to honor election results titled, “If I Was Trump, I’d Examine Election Results TOO!” The focus of that post is the fact that Dems admitted in an undercover video that the American Left had been committing voter fraud for decades.

 

While I was looking around in research I discovered an even better video at the G+ Conservative Community that addresses all the lies and deceptions of Crooked Hillary in the third Presidential Debate.

 

JRH 10/21/16 (Hat Tip Kevin Cunniff)

Please Support NCCR

***********************

VIDEO: Decision 2016: A Guide for Hillary & Trump Voters

 

Posted by Black Pigeon Speaks

Published on Oct 20, 2016

 

⚫ Tip Jar: via PayPal to: NAVYHATO@gmail.com
If you would like to support this channel, it would be GREATLY appreciated.
⚫ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/blackpigeon?ty=h

 

… There is more to read unrelated to the video

If I Was Trump, I’d Examine Election Results TOO!


skeleton-not-always-vote-until-dead-patriot-post-version

John R. Houk

© October 20, 2016

 

I watched the Presidential Debate from Wednesday Oct. 19 on Fox News. After the debate one thing the Fox analysts was astonished by Trump’s saying he may not support the outcome of the election to be held on November 8. And sure enough one of the analysts did a quite online perusal of debate headlines and they called condemned Trump for his unwillingness to commit to supporting the election outcome if he lost.

 

The thing is I did not even think Trump’s stand was even close to being outrageous when he said that. I mean most Conservatives are quite aware the Dems either directly or indirectly through surrogates, have done their best to rig or fix elections toward a positive Dem Party outcome for decades.

 

Debate moderator Chris Wallace asked the Republican presidential nominee whether he would honor the election results despite his unfounded declaration that the election may be “rigged” against him.

 

I will look at it at the time. I’m not looking at anything now. I’ll look at it at the time,” Trump replied.

 

Pressed again by Wallace moments later, Trump said he’ll “keep you in suspense” about his decision. (Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of election: ‘I will keep you in suspense’; By Maxwell Tani; Business Insider; 10/19/16)

 

If you examine actually said in Chris Wallace question and the Donald Trump response, YOU will notice the context was in view of decades of Crooked-Fraudulent election acts by Democrats and Dem surrogates in voter fraud. James O’Keefe through Project Veritas have caught the Dems in their own words saying the very same thing that Donald Trump was talking about!

 

Here’s the Debate context which includes a blurb of Crooked Hillary obfuscating Dem voter fraud by trying to change the subject about half-truths (contrarily meaning half-false) on Donald civil problems. Keep in mind folks that any civil problems Trump has or has had is dwarfed by Crooked Hillary’s felonious activities as Secretary of State that FBI Director James Comey choose to ignore OR was told to ignore by higher ups.

 

VIDEO: Trump on accepting election outcome: “I’ll keep you in suspense”

 

Posted by AL.com

Published on Oct 19, 2016

 

Donald Trump responds to a question over whether he would accept the results of the election.

 

AND NOW Project Veritas:

 

VIDEO: Rigging the Election – Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

 

 Posted by Project Veritas Action

Published on Oct 17, 2016

 

In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging.

A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this m**erf***er.” [Profanity editing by Blog Editor]

Website: http://projectveritasaction.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit[Blog Editor: On browser this Facebook link comes up broken. After a Facebook search here are two pages related to the above link:]

 

 

 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action

 

NOW! Do you think should examine an election loss before conceding OR WHAT?

 

JRH 10/20/16

Please Support NCCR

 

Traitor Is Her Name


Justin Smith submitted the post “Traitor is Her Name” to me on October 15. I have noticed it was picked up nearly instantaneously by many other websites of a Conservative nature (ipatriot.com is one of a few I ran into). This post is that good!

 

VIDEO: Leaked Doc Shows Hillary Revealed Classified Info About Bin Laden During Paid Speech

 

Posted by John Houk

Published on Oct 18, 2016

 

Western Journalism recorded a Fox News report of Catherine Herridge exposing Crooked Hillary for revealing Classified info on the details of Usama bin Laden’s death at the hands of Navy SEALS. WJ Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/gryzmat

 

As the Editor of this blog I took it upon myself to source most of the accusations that are quite justifiable yet denied by most Leftist Dems. Crooked Hillary has a lot to account for that the Leftist Mainstream Media and NeverTrumpers skip over to ignore her diabolical life over the decades. Justin here only examines her corruption from the State Department to just prior her candidacy.

 

JRH 10/18/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

Traitor Is Her Name

Hillary’s Treasonous Heart

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 10/15/2016 2:01 PM

 

A cold, calculating and deliberate international criminal, treason is her trade and “Traitor” is her name, a woman who has sabotaged the laws and principles of the United States of America that she swore to uphold. Some call her the “Butcher of Libya” [WND]. Whether she is undermining America’s national security through self-enriching corrupt uranium deals with Russia, making state secrets available to our enemies or arming Al Qaeda and other enemies of the United States, the anti-American radicals know her as Hillary Clinton.

 

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or adhering to their enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” – Article III Section 3 U.S. Constitution

 

A treacherous scheme [Powerline] started in 2005 between the Clintons, Frank Giustra [Clinton Email Investigation Timeline & The Daily Caller] – a Canadian mining tycoon and Kazakhstan’s dictator Nazarbayev [Wikipedia] – a murderer [Human Rights Foundation] and slave trader, that netted the Clintons over $145 million dollars to their “Foundation” and transferred over 25% of all U.S. uranium output to Russia in 2009 [The New American on crooked deal], and they increased Russia’s control through a 2010 deal between the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Agency (Rosatom) and Giustra and investors in Uranium One [Red State]. As Secretary of State, Hillary was supposed to get pre-approval from the Obama administration on contributions to the Clinton Foundation from foreign governments and foreign government-owned businesses, but she broke this pledge often, jeopardizing America’s national security.

 

Russia and Rosatom have a record of supporting nuclear programs [Geopolitical Monitor & Global Risk Insights] in countries that are openly hostile to the United States, such as Iran, North Korea and Venezuela. And now, America’s uranium could find its way to an Iranian or North Korean nuclear reactor and their weapons programs, thanks to Hillary and her brazen contempt for our nation’s interests and security.

 

Hillary’s numerous other betrayals of America are even more ugly, despicable and reprehensible. No crime is beyond Hillary’s imagination.

 

An intelligence correspondent, Catherine Herridge recently reported [WJ has Herridge transcript] on Fox News that Hillary specifically discussed “sources and methods” of the raid that killed 9/11 terrorist Osama Bin Laden, during a paid speech for a group of Canadian business leaders in November 2013. This was a clear violation of national security, and it resulted in the murders of some of our Middle East intelligence operatives.

 

Libya serves as a prime example of just how insignificant U.S. national security and American lives are to Hillary Clinton. At her strong insistence, America, European Union leaders and NATO falsely enacted the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine [UN propaganda] and attacked Muammar Gaddafi [Strategic Culture Foundation], Libya’s dictator, ignoring the U.S. Congress and the UN Resolution against an offensive aimed at ousting Gaddafi [Interesting: Hillary Emails Reveal True Motive for Libya InterventionForeign Policy Journal], who had been a key counter-terrorism ally of the Bush administration. Gaddafi wasn’t killing innocent civilians, as alleged. He was killing the Islamofascists of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Al Qaeda groups attempting to overthrow his secular Baathist government; it is also important to note that the U.S. had restored diplomatic relations with Gaddafi in 2007.

 

Primarily, Obama, Hillary and President Sarkozy of France wanted Gaddafi gone, in order to save Lehman Brothers Bank from reimbursing Libya over $50 billion dollars Lehman lost in “investments”. They also wanted to block Gaddafi’s plan to counter the French franc and euro with a Pan-African currency, which would have challenged Western currencies across North Africa, by seizing Gaddafi’s $7 billion dollars worth of gold and silver, and they wanted Libya’s oil to save the EU from Russia’s energy blackmail.

 

Hillary wasn’t motivated to save Libyan lives. It was pure despicable, malevolent greed motivating her, which makes the murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty all the more egregious and sickening, since the Libyan adventurist folly was unnecessary and not serving the U.S.’s best interests.

 

Not only did Hillary violate U.S. Code Section 2339A, 2339B and 2778 [Statute Links to Cornell Law], by arming the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group [Gen. Flynn at Fox News & National Review] – an affiliate of Al Qaeda that was still on the US State Department’s terror list at the time, she created a covert arms program that placed Stinger-7 missiles in the hands of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Al Qaeda and the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, arming the very terrorists who had already murdered thousands of Americans.

 

From 2010 to 2012, Hillary’s State Department brokered $165 billion worth of arms sales to 20 nations, many of them hostile to America to one degree or another, whose governments “donated” (delivered bribes) to the Clinton Foundation, according to the IB Times, and she authorized $151 billion in separate Pentagon deals for 16 other nations that also “donated” to her foundation. The kickbacks she received from Marc Turi’s $300 million illegal arms deal [Red State, The Blaze & American Thinker] was nothing in comparison to the money she received from deals running the “rat-line” of weapons to America’s Islamofascist enemies, that was funded by the anti-American Islamists of Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

 

On July 25th, 2012, according to sources in the U.S. Special Forces Command, and Lt General W.G. “Jerry” Boykin and General Michael Flynn, Taliban jihadists in Kunar province downed a U.S. Army CH-47 with a Stinger missile, identified by an entire serial number an ordnance disposal team found on an unexploded fragment of the missile casing. This Stinger was determined to be from the same lot sold to Qatar in early 2011 and the same weapons Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. sent to the Libyan Islamofascist terrorists [The Last Great Stand].

 

The Department of Justice is currently counting its 30 pieces of silver, after announcing recently that they are dropping the 2011 charges against Marc Turi, Hillary’s arms broker, for falsely listing Qatar and the United Arab Emirates as the end users for the weapons that went to Libya in 2011. Obviously, Attorney General Loretta Lynch is once more covering for Obama and “Crooked” Hillary.

 

Last month, three members of the Libyan parliament representing tribes nearly destroyed by the Islamofascists, before and after the coup that killed Gaddafi, called Hillary the “Butcher of Libya”. They charge that she did nothing to stop the Islamic militia’s “ethnic cleansing”/murder of 250,000 Black Libyans [Anti-Media] of the Tawegha tribes [Levant Report] and others, who supported Gaddafi.

 

Jaballah Al-Shibani stated [WND]: “Under Gaddafi women were free to be educated, women were not required to wear any special clothing and women were free to walk the streets … [Now] thousands of families [have been] destroyed … with women now living under Sharia law … Secretary Clinton orchestrated the plot with NATO that destroyed Libya for personal gain … Clinton and her group … aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood to control the oil fields and the oil revenue.”

 

Just as troubling, Hillary has had Huma Abedin [FrontPageMag] as her top aide for years, even though Abedin was also working for the Muslim World League [DTN] at the time, whose explicit goal is to conquer the West in the name of Islam, sympathizing with Al Qaeda and the Islamic State. A Muslim Brotherhood agent from an illustrious Muslim Brotherhood family, Abedin has been privy to an enormous wealth of information concerning strategy plans and operation details in the war on terror, which might explain how Ambassador Stevens’ secret trip to Benghazi was exposed to the terrorists.

 

Treason is burning bright in Hillary’s heart, as Americans have witnessed from her long record of reprehensible criminal acts and betrayals of America. Not only has she betrayed the U.S. to the evil, vile, militarily aggressive Ayatollahs of Iran and Russia’s Putin, but her actions as Secretary of State have already cost hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide, including American (U.S. Soldiers) lives. Her promises to secure America’s safety are empty. Her loyalties are not to America, but only to herself and her cronies, and this disqualifies her from becoming President of the United States. [Bold text is blog Editor’s]

 

By Justin O. Smith

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All links are by the Editor as well as text embraced by brackets.

 

Here’s the ipatriot bio on Justin Smith from “Traitor is Her Name.”

 

Justin O. Smith has lived in Tennessee off and on most of his adult life, and he graduated from Middle Tennessee State University in 1980, with a B.S. and a double major in International Relations and Cultural Geography – minors in Military Science and English, for what it’s worth. His real education started from that point on. Smith worked 8 years for the LaVergne Fire Dept. – two years as their clean-up boy – and became a working fireman at age 16, working his way through college and subsequently joining the U.S. Army. Since then he primarily has contracted construction and traveled – spending quite a bit of time up and down the Columbia River Gorge, in the Puget Sound on Whidby Island and down around Ft. Lauderdale and South Beach. Justin currently writes a weekly column for The Rutherford Reader in Murfreesboro, TN, which he calls home and he spends as much time as possible with his two beautiful and intelligent daughters and five grandchildren. Justin Loves God, Family and Our Majestic and Wonderful America, and he is a Son of Liberty.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Crooked Hillary: Prosecute & Lock Up


bill-congrats-hillary-no-text-relations-toon

John R. Houk

© October 16 2016

 

I am taking this 2016 election cycle personally AND if you are a Conservative or a Patriot, you should take this election personally as well.

 

In 2012 Mitt Romney was the GOP nominee for President. I was not in the Romney camp during the Primaries! I voted for him anyway because President Barack Hussein Obama was and is a deceiver and liar. Indeed, Obama’s reelection in 2012 was largely predicated on the lie that the entire Benghazi debacle that resulted in four American deaths was the fault of an obscure anti-Muslim movie trailer rather than the ineptitude of lackadaisical security protection on the part of Crooked Hillary which in turn resulted in an organized predetermined Islamic terrorist attack.

 

Hillary Clinton’s ineptitude did not stop or begin with the Benghazi Massacre, but was evidenced in signing off on 20% of American uranium going to Russia via the idiotic Uranium One deal, the idiotic deal Obama-Crooked Hillary-John Kerry made with Iran and probably leaving more idiotic actions yet allow me to highlight the felonious action of setting up an illegal private server at Crooked Hillary’s private residence. AND Crooked Hillary is telling everyone she too incompetent to know the letter “c” meant CLASSIFIED data which was received and sent. And the letter “c” was too incompetent she was too incompetent to understand that unmarked data may be marked CLASSIFIED retroactively! AND SHE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT?

 

Uranium One Hypocrisy

 

Of all the Clinton Foundation/Clinton cash scandals, the one I’ve always considered most disturbing involves the Russians gaining control over a large share of America’s uranium. Relying on a New York Times report, I wrote about this scandal here.

 

Newly uncovered State Department documents shed additional light on this scandal. But before getting to the new material, I’ll summarize what the New York Times reported.

 

What we knew already

 

In 2005, Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra visited Kazakhstan. Giustra is a massive donor to the Clinton Foundation.

 

Giustra’s goal was to buy uranium mines in Kazakhstan. To this end, he and Bill Clinton met with leaders of the Kazakhstan government.

 

As a result of the visit, Giustra got major mining concessions, which were approved by the Kazakhstan government. Kazakhstan got Bill Clinton publicly to praise its alleged progress in democracy and human rights. The Clintons received a $31 million donation to their Foundation from Giustra, along with a pledge to donate $100 million more.

 

The deal with Kazakhstan made Giustra’s company, Uranium One, a major player. It proceeded to buy large amounts of holdings in the United States, and became an attractive target for Russia. A Russian company made a hugely attractive offer to purchase the company. Uranium One agreed to the purchase.

 

The deal required approval by the U.S. government, including by the Secretary of State — Hillary Clinton. During the period when the deal with Russia was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation reportedly $2.6 million from Uranium One. Its contributions were not disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Hillary had reached with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.

 

During this period, Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank that was promoting Uranium One stock. This was more than his usual speaking fee.

 

Hillary Clinton duly approved the deal. It made the Russian company Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Vladimir Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

 

The deal left huge amounts of U.S. uranium under the control of Russia. The New York Times estimates this share at 20 percent. But Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, say that it amounts to up to 50 percent of projected U.S. uranium output.

 

What we have recently learned

 

When Hillary Clinton was questioned about the deal, she said READ THE REST (MEMO SHEDS NEW LIGHT ON CLINTON-RUSSIA URANIUM SCANDAL; By PAUL MIRENGOFF; Power Line; 8/26/16)

 

And Fox News on October 12 shows that Crooked Hillary is much closer to the Russia she accuses of hacking emails to benefit Donald Trump:

 

Shame on the New York Times. Despite leaked emails revealing collusion with the Clinton campaign that should embarrass any legitimate news organization, the paper continues to carry water for the Democrat candidate.

 

Among other fictions, the Times frequently repeats the meme that Donald Trump is in cahoots with the Russians. Wednesday, in fact, the supposed collaboration between Trump and Vladimir Putin occupies prime turf as the paper’s lead editorial. It’s time to pull the plug on this nonsense.

 

The narrative that the Russians are trying to manipulate our election in favor of Mr. Trump has proved vital cover for the damaging emails released by Wikileaks that indeed show election manipulation – by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

 

 

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton actually does have ties to the Kremlin – ties which, had they been reported with any honesty, would have become an issue in this campaign.

 

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton helped Russian interests, operating under a directive from Putin, buy majority ownership of Uranium One, a Canadian firm that was on its way to controlling almost half of U.S. uranium production. Expanding its access to uranium around the world had become a priority for the Kremlin; control of the raw material would bolster its opportunities to build nuclear power plants such as the Bushehr facilities in Iran and similar projects in North Korea and Venezuela.

 

In pursuit of the transaction, which required sign-off by Secretary Clinton, tens of millions of dollars flowed to the Clinton Foundation through its Canadian branch – moneys that were not reported by the foundation. Moneys, too, that violated Secretary of State Clinton’s memorandum of agreement with the Obama White House and contradicted information provided by Hillary to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

 

Not only did the Clinton Foundation benefit from ties to Russia, Bill Clinton personally collected half a million dollars at about the same time for a speech made at a forum organized by a financial firm called RenCap, whose ranks were known to include ex-KGB types hand-picked by Putin.

 

 

It’s not only Hillary Clinton who helped out Putin. President Obama has arguably given the Russian leader an enormous boost, allowing him to reassert his country’s influence around the globe even as its coffers are depleted by the collapse of oil prices.

 

Russia effectively is in control of the Middle East, dictating the terms of battle in Syria, resurrecting Bashar Al-Assad’s presidency, supplying Iran with a missile defense system designed to protect its Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility, reestablishing ties with Turkey, threatening to shoot down U.S. planes. And let us not forget that Obama stood by as Russia took over Crimea.

 

 

So, when Trump calls Putin a “strong leader”, he’s right. Putin is reprehensible, devious and undoubtedly hostile to the U.S. But let us not underestimate who has been Putin’s best bud over the past decade. It is not Donald Trump.

 

In 2011, Hillary Clinton accused Vladimir Putin of READ ENTIRETY (It’s Hillary, Obama who have boosted Putin’s fortunes, not Trump; By Liz Peek; Fox News; 10/12/16)

 

Undisclosed Secrets Enable Iranian Nukes

 

 

However, according to a think tank report, the USA and its negotiating partners agreed “in secret” to allow Iran to evade some restrictions in last year’s landmark nuclear agreement in order to meet the deadline for it to start getting relief from economic sanctions. Among the exemptions outlined in the think tank’s report were two that allowed Iran to exceed the deal’s limits on how much low-enriched uranium (LEU) it can keep in its nuclear facilities, the report said. LEU can be purified into highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium.

 

Israel and Saudi Arabia found this attitude of USA unacceptable. One senior “knowledgeable” official, however, was cited by the report as saying that if the joint commission had not acted to create these exemptions, some of Iran’s nuclear facilities would not have been in compliance with the deal by Jan. 16, the deadline for the beginning of the lifting of sanctions. The US government has said that the world powers that negotiated the accord made no secret arrangements.

 

Real concessions?

 

The United States and its negotiating partners apparently agreed “in secret” to allow Iran to evade some restrictions in last year’s landmark nuclear agreement in order to meet the deadline for it to start getting relief from economic sanctions, according to a recent think tank report.

 

The exemptions were approved by the joint commission the deal created to oversee implementation of the accord. The commission is comprised of the United States and its negotiating partners — called the P5+1 — and Iran.

 

The report, which was released by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, is based on information provided by several officials of governments involved in the negotiations. The group’s president David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector and co-author of the report, said the exemptions or loopholes are happening in secret, and it appears that they favor Iran.

 

The report ignited a chorus of Republican criticism, including from the campaign of presidential nominee Donald Trump. His campaign sought to link the findings to Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state when secret talks were held with Iran but had left office before formal negotiations began. “The deeply flawed nuclear deal Hillary Clinton secretly spearheaded with Iran looks worse and worse by the day,” said a statement issued by retired Army General Michael Flynn, a top Trump adviser. “It’s now clear President Obama gave away the store to secure a weak agreement that is full of loopholes.”

 

The Clinton campaign did not immediately comment on the report. The White House said it took “significant exception” to some of the report’s findings, saying that the easing of sanctions was always dependent upon Iran’s adherence to the agreement. “The implementation date was driven by the ability of the International Atomic Energy Agency to verify that Iran had completed the steps that they promised to take,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at a briefing. “That is what precipitated implementation day. Since then Iran has been in compliance with the agreement,” Earnest said.

 

Among the exemptions outlined in the think tank’s report were two that allowed Iran to exceed the deal’s limits on how much low-enriched uranium (LEU) it can keep in its nuclear facilities, the report said. LEU can be purified into highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium.

 

One senior “knowledgeable” official was cited by the report as saying that if the joint commission had not acted to create these exemptions, some of Iran’s nuclear facilities would not have been in compliance with the deal READ ENIRETY (Iran since the nuclear deal with West; By DR. ABDUL RUFF; Modern Diplomacy; 9/27/16)

 

These secret deals will not America safe from a nuclear armed Iran as Crooked Hillary claims:

 

The Associated Press reported earlier this week that a previously secret document showed that a number of restrictions imposed by last year’s nuclear deal with Iran will expire after ten years, allowing Iran to achieve a nuclear breakout time as little as three months by the end of the deal in 15 years.

 

 

One other implication of this document is its formal acceptance of Iran’s uranium enrichment program. Emily Landau, head of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies, told the The Jerusalem Post earlier this week, the document “proves that Iran’s enrichment program has been totally legitimized by this deal.”

 

 

While the document obtained by the AP may have been secret, the idea that Iran would be able to replace old centrifuges with newer ones has been known since last year. When it wrote its assessment of the deal last year the Institute for Science and International Security took these replacements into account and estimated Iran’s breakout time at the end of the 15-year deal to be about three months. (According to the institute by year 18, Iran’s breakout time would be a matter of days.) This of course goes against the administration’s boast that the deal cut off all Iran’s pathways to a bomb for at least a year. [Emphasis added by Blog Editor]

 

 

Nor would these be the only secret documents kept from Congress. Last year there was a scandal over side deals between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran governing the inspection of military sites. According to those side deals, which were reported in August of last year, Iran, not IAEA inspectors would take samples for testing. This side deal raised questions as to how accurately the IAEA could assess suspicious activity by Iran.

 

As it happens, the Parhcin testing turned up two uranium particles last year that even the administration, in June, acknowledged came from Iran’s past nuclear research. Yet despite this find, the IAEA, in December of last year, declared its investigation into Iran’s past nuclear activities closed allowing the deal to proceed to Implementation Day and the ending of nuclear sanctions against Iran.

 

 

Taken together – allowing Iran to improve its enrichment, giving Iran control over inspections, watering down the reporting of the IAEA – we have a deal that was designed not to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but rather a deal designed to ensure that Iran is never penalized for future nuclear violations.

 

 

So yes the revelation that Iran will be able to ramp up its uranium enrichment as part of the nuclear is a big deal. But given the administration’s behavior so far READ ENTIRETY (More proof Iran Nuke Deal not about stopping a nuclear weapon; By David Gerstman; Legal In.sur.rec.tion; 7/25/16 8:30 am)

 

Crooked Hillary Broke the Law in Private Server Use

 

 

Hillary Clinton Was Trained in Classified Information

 

As secretary of State, Clinton had been trained by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security in the “Safe Handling of Information.” In addition, she was fully aware of President Obama’s 2010 executive order on “Classified National Security Information” that requires heads of departments to be informed of the requirements regarding classified information.

 

As reported by Kristinn Taylor of Gateway Pundit in 2015, Clinton received training in handling classified information as stated in the “Diplomatic Security 2009 Year in Review” booklet. Under the heading “Safe Handling of Information” on page 21, the bureau boasted of its efforts to quickly bring new Obama administration appointees up to speed on security issues.

 

 

Clinton was also given the authority “to personally classify as ‘Top Secret’ government intelligence such as the emails containing reportedly unlabeled highly classified information she received on the private home-brew server Clinton used throughout her four-year tenure as secretary.”

 

In addition to her Diplomatic Security training, Clinton, as secretary of State, was bound by President Obama’s 2010 executive order on classified information. That order “prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism.”

 

 

Get Trained Or Lose Your Clearance and Face Prosecution

 

According to the president’s order, “Every person who has met the standards for access to classified information in paragraph (a) of this section shall receive contemporaneous training on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions that may be imposed on an individual who fails to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.”

 

 

Not only that, the order by the president clearly prohibits removing classified information from “official premises without proper authorization.”

 

 

Only Negligence Is Required, Not Intent

 

“None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,” Comey said. In addition, the FBI found that “with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems,” the State Department “was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.”

 

This is in direct conflict with federal law on the management of classified information by agency heads. But, as Comey has repeatedly said, no criminal charges can be filed because he thinks Clinton did not intentionally mishandle classified information.

 

But how can an individual endowed with classification authority and trained in handling classified information repeatedly and consistently violate that training? The president’s order clearly says … READ ENTIRETY (Documents Say Hillary Clinton Knew She Was Breaking National Security Laws; By D.C. McAllister; The Federalist; 7/7/16)

 

Rare Integrity in Obama Administration: Whistleblowers Expose that FBI & DOJ Members Crooked Hillary Exonerated by Political Order!

 

Washington, D.C. – A high-ranking FBI official has blown the whistle on what they say was a politically motivated, top-down decision to not recommend Hillary Clinton face criminal charges for her mishandling of classified intelligence.

 

The anonymous source that worked intimately on the Clinton investigation told Fox News that FBI agents working the case, as well as DOJ attorneys on the case, unanimously believed that Clinton should have her security clearance revoked, with the “vast majority” believing she should be criminally charged.
“It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked,” the senior FBI official told Fox news. “It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted. We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

 

The entire team was stunned when FBI Director Comey announced on July 5 that he would not be recommending a criminal indictment to the Attorney General’s office, according to the source.

 

“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and actual role in the case were vetted and verified by Fox News.

 

… a number of veteran FBI agents who have come forward to rebuke Comey’s politicization of a once respected law enforcement organization.

 

“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time. I hold Director Comey responsible,” Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, told the NY Post.

 

Retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello also noted in the Post’s report that, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

 

“The FBI could not seize anything related to the investigation, only request things. As an example, in order to get the laptop, they had to agree to grant immunity,” Napolitano said.

 

According to a report by Fox News:

In early 2015, it was revealed that Clinton had used a private email server in her Chappaqua, N.Y., home to conduct government business while serving from 2009-2013. The emails on the private server included thousands of messages that would later be marked classified by the State Department retroactively. Federal law makes it a crime for a government employee to possess classified information in an unsecure manner, and the relevant statute does not require a finding of intent.

 

Although Comey found that Clinton was “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” he said “no charges are appropriate in this case.”

 

Just days before Comey’s announcement, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who was originally appointed as a federal prosecutor by Bill Clinton, met with in secret on the tarmac of an airport runway Bill Clinton.

 

Another oddity of the investigation, signaling that it was intentionally being manipulated from above, was the fact that the FBI forced its agents and analysts involved in the case to sign non-disclosure agreements.
“This is unheard of, because of the stifling nature it has on the investigative process,” the source said.

 

Adding the strange behavior displayed by FBI during READ ENTIRETY (BREAKING: FBI in Revolt — Top FBI Official Exposes Massive Corruption Which Let Clinton’s Crimes Slide; By Jay Syrmopoulos; TheFreeThoughtProject.com; 10/13/16)

How an American voter could place someone like Crooked Hillary in Office is far-far beyond me?!

 

Of Interest

 

 

 


Below is an article from WND promoting a petition encouraging Congress and Donald Trump to investigate Crooked Hillary independently from the FBI. It is quite evident that all the government Branches under Obama’s Administration is so corrupt that the prosecution of actual crime will not be forthcoming.

 

In full disclosure these kind of petitions are typically fund raising ploys. It is quite obvious unless WND can collect signatures numbering in the millions such a petition will be ignored. However, this petition doesn’t seem to be a fund raiser. Perhaps in guessing, at least an outlying purpose is to collect email addresses for WND subscriptions or promotions. I urge you to sign the petition for the potential for signatures in the millions to occur. That potential outcome would boggle the mind of the Left Stream Media and the Elitist Republican Establishment.

clinton-corruption-deman-answers

JRH 10/16/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

TELL CONGRESS AND TRUMP TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY!

New demands for fresh, apolitical probe of Espionage Act violations, mishandling state secrets, destroying evidence, more


WND

October 13, 2016

 

Ever since the second presidential debate, when Donald Trump told Hillary Clinton that as president he would “instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation,” Democrats and the big media have gone wild – accusing Trump of emulating the world’s most evil tyrants and dictators, from Hugo Chavez to Robert Mugabe to Vladimir Putin, despots who routinely imprison – if not shoot – their political opponents.

 
Trump, however, claims he wants to see Clinton investigated, not because she is a political opponent, but because she has blatantly violated U.S. espionage laws, mishandled top-secret information, destroyed government files and obstructed justice.

 

Is Trump right in calling for a fresh, independent investigation of Clinton’s “situation”?

 

Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!

 

How relevant is it that, as multiple news reports confirm, “FBI agents are ready to revolt” over Director James Comey’s “cowardly” whitewash of the bureau’s investigation? Or that even the left-leaning PolitiFact website confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Clinton’s unsecure private server three weeks after she received a congressional subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally would result in being held in contempt of Congress. Or that more than half of all Americans – 56 percent according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey – believe Hillary Clinton should have been indicted.

 

With not only FBI agents and half the electorate outraged at Comey’s refusal to indict, but legal experts like Judge Andrew Napolitano openly saying “the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming” and “it was obviously a policy decision by the White House not to investigate her,” Donald Trump has promised as president to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair investigation – one not compromised by shameful political loyalties.

 

What do YOU think? If Trump wins, should he prosecute Hillary? Sound off in today’s WND poll

 

In light of this situation and the dangerous precedent of allowing certain “royalty” to operate above the laws that govern the rest of Americans, WND is launching an important online petition intended to show support for a truly impartial investigation of Hillary Clinton’s violation of the Espionage Act, as well as her blatant contempt of Congress in destroying 33,000 emails three weeks after they were subpoenaed by Congress.

 

“We’re taking this extraordinary editorial measure because it’s clear now no one but Trump will ever actually attempt to hold the Clintons accountable for their many overt criminal activities,” said Joseph Farah, founder and chief executive officer of WND. “We believe this is reason enough to vote for Trump. He needs encouragement to run hard, win and fulfill his promise to seek a special independent counsel to investigate and prosecute Hillary Clinton as well as to encourage contempt of Congress charges and penalties.”

 

Sign the petition calling for a new investigation of Hillary Clinton and demanding Congress hold her in contempt!

 

The petition asks Congress “to hold Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for purposely destroying evidence three weeks after it was subpoenaed,” and supports Donald Trump’s intention, if he is elected president, to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair investigation – one not compromised by craven political loyalties – into Hillary Clinton’s egregious abuse of America’s state secrets.”

 

SIGN THE PETITION NOW!

___________________

Blog Editor: In case you have not yet signed the petition, here’s a petition excerpt to further encourage you to at least take your frustrations out on the current elitist system abused especially by the Democrats but obviously by Establishment/Elitist Republicans!

 

PETITION URGING SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON’S CRIMES

 

WND

October 13, 2016

PETITION URGING DONALD TRUMP, IF ELECTED PRESIDENT, TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT – AND URGING CONGRESS TO HOLD HER IN CONTEMPT FOR DESTROYING OVER 30,000 EMAIL DOCUMENTS AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED

 

clinton-corruption-deman-answers

Whereas, Donald Trump, during the second presidential debate on Oct. 9, said to Hillary Clinton, “If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we’re going to have a special prosecutor”;

 

Whereas, Trump added that not only are Americans “furious” over Clinton’s crimes, but the FBI as well, stating, “In my opinion, the people that have been long-time workers at the FBI are furious. There has never been anything like this, where … you get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 emails and then you acid wash them or bleach them … So we’re going to get a special prosecutor and we’re going to look into it”;

 

Whereas, even the left-leaning PolitiFact website confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Hillary’s unsecure private server three weeks after she received a congressional subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally would result in being held in contempt of Congress;

 

Whereas, news reports confirm that “FBI agents are ready to revolt” over Director James Comey’s “cowardly” whitewash of Hillary Clinton’s long-term mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server, with Dennis V. Hughes, former chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, saying, “The FBI has politicized itself and its reputation will suffer for a long time – I hold Director Comey responsible,” and retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello adding, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization”;

 

Whereas, fully 56 percent of Americans, including many Democrats, say FBI Director James Comey should have recommended that Hillary Clinton be indicted over her intentional mishandling of classified emails while secretary of state, according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey;

 

Whereas, legal expert …  READ THE REST & SIGN!!!

___________________

Crooked Hillary: Prosecute & Lock Up

John R. Houk

© October 16 2016

___________________

TELL CONGRESS AND TRUMP TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY!

 

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com

 

More Sifu/John Debate on Trump


John R. Houk

Sifu Mode

© October 13, 2016

hillary-the-criminal

Sifu and I continue our debate on Donald Trump. He posted the comment on the post that inspired the debate: “Trump vs. Crooked Hillary – Conservative vs. Leftist”. However Sifu’s thoughts are based on the cross post of his original comment on the newer post, “Trump the same as a Dem Administration?

 

I thought Sifu was a Leftist the way he came after Trump, but it appears I am mistaken. I went to his G+ page and it looks to me that Sifu is a bona fide Conservative. I can only guess he is a NeverTrumper. That is absolutely Sifu’s right, but I think NeverTrumpers will insure a Crooked Hillary election even if they vote for neither Hillary or Trump. Crooked Hillary will take America further down the tubes with a large amount of certainty. I’m willing to give Trump a shot to follow through or modify his campaign promises to make America great again.

 

If the NeverTrumpers turn out to be correct or Crooked Hillary is indeed elected, then I will abandon the GOP completely as in never voting for a Republican because of ineffectiveness. If bad scenarios evolve it will be time to replace the Republican Party with politicians actually accountable to Conservative voters rather than some elitist Establishment with an elitist agenda out of touch with constituents.

 

Since I was unaware of Sifu’s political persuasion I am not going to search for where I may have called him (or her) a Leftist. NeverTrumper Conservatives are still Conservatives. It is my humble opinion an elected Crooked Hillary will corrupt America absolutely. A corrupt America is not a good America. On a personal level a Trump gamble is better than a crooked and corrupt Hillary Clinton.

 

Sifu, if you are reading this, I have been researching and writing this piece for the better part of the day. I am too lazy to fix any of my accusations of you being a Leftist. I apologize ahead of time.

 

Sifu quotes me in italics text then offers his thoughts criticizing Donald Trump. I answer Sifu in bold text primarily defending Trump but also tossing in some Crooked Hillary barbs.

 

JRH 10/13/16

Please Support NCCR

*************

Sifu Mode

10/12/16

 

+John Houk

 

I don’t see any massive growth of government

Look at everything he says he wants to do. Everything. It is by federal programs. He will have to create departments with staffs and budgets. He wants to continue Obamacare. He wants to raise the minimum wage. He wants to try to run the economy like it is one of his businesses. If you don’t see it, that is you choosing not to.

 

I want Trump to run the Executive Branch like his business. Efficient spending rather than wasteful spending. If a project isn’t working, rather than making excuses or blaming someone else then scrap and start over – much like a high dollar bankruptcy restructuring for success. Frankly unlike most of my fellow Conservatives I don’t have a problem Big Government. My problem with government is private citizen intrusion and wasteful spending. Obamacare is a debacle of good intentions ruined by lies and deception and worse – INEFFICIENCY. I have no problem with healthcare reform, but a socialist system will be too costly and inefficient much like Veteran’s Healthcare has led to deaths.

 

Obama’s military reduction, idiotic rules of engagement and a strategy to lose rather than win has made America less secure. AND I like the idea of our allies contributing a fairer share of defense money or making a deal that makes our protection worthy of our cost.

 

Donald does want a higher minimum wage but not as high as the Dems AND he favors an Amendment 10 (10th Amendment Explained) action rather than Federal action on a minimum wage.

 

Donald Trump on 5/8/16:

 

No, I’d rather have the states go out and do what they have to do. And the states compete with each other, not only other countries, but they compete with each other, Chuck. So I like the idea of let the states decide. But I think people should get more. I think they’re out there. They’re working. It is a very low number. You know, with what’s happened to the economy, with what’s happened to the cost. I mean, it’s just– I don’t know how you live on $7.25 an hour. But I would say let the states decide.

 

I understand the fiscal difficulties with rounding up illegal aliens and deporting them en masse; however, preventing more illegal aliens should be preeminent then work on getting rid of criminal illegal aliens then amnesty for working illegal aliens so that they can pay taxes and responsible for the rule of law like American citizens.

 

Trump Policy Page

 

 

Blog Editor: I suspect Crooked Hillary has her own version of cybersecurity that probably includes Bit Bleach and a hammer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blog Editor: The Child Care policy seems to me to be Liberal slanted rather than Conservative; however, it is practical for lower income citizens.

 

 

All these policies may have some government growth BUT they also enable government streamlining as well as economic growth which means job creation which means more tax revenue without raising personal taxes. That works for me as opposed to Hillary’s Leftist Transformative Obama-utopianism that destroys social and personal Liberty fabric of American culture.

Trump is not Hitler!

I never suggested he was. I pointed specifically to the fact that nationalism is not a binary good or bad, yet that is one of the only differences between him and Obama. This is not necessarily a good thing.

 

Hmm Sifu … You said, “Maybe he will be rabidly nationalist. How are those necessarily good? Putin isn’t weak. Doesn’t make him good. Hitler was nationalist. Didn’t make him good.”

 

Binary or not, the imagery alludes to the picture that Trump’s nationalism is comparable to Hitler’s Socialist Nationalism (Nazi: Comes the German “Nationalsozialist”, in English “National Socialist which is derived from “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”). It sounds like a Trump=Hitler image to me. I understand that “binary” in this case refers to the potential of good and bad, but there is a large disparity between Trump’s Nationalism and Hitler’s racial supremacist socialistic Nationalism. Trump’s Nationalism makes America exceptional and Hitler’s Left Wing Nationalism was imperialistic and genocidal.

Is Trump fascist? Well, remember, fascism doesn’t have to include genocide as Hitler did.

 

But fascism is despotic, supremacist and worse elitist statism as opposed to American Constitutional Originalism that limits the power of National Government.

fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

So, if we made a checklist
1. Nationalist
2. What the leader says, goes
3. Not allowed to criticize the administration
4. Harsh social regimentation
5. Harsh economic regulation
6. Strong central government
This description is more relevant to the current makeup of the Obama/Crooked Hillary domination of America rather than a limited government.

  1. We know Trump is a nationalist, so CHECK

BUT not a Socialist/Fascist National, so NOT CHECK!

  1. He is constantly saying he will impose his ideas, regardless of anyone else’s opinion, so the second point is CHECK

Again, NOT CHECK! If a person given a job fails, they are fired. That has nothing to do with imposing Trump’s will on WE THE PEOPLE such as Obama has done and the Obama third term via Crooked Hillary.

  1. http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/02/trump-promises-to-make-harsh-media-criticism-of-him-illegal-if-he-becomes-president/

Counter Current News – really? Sounds more like a Leftist rag concerned about litigation from a deep pockets billionaire when spin something into a lie.

 

From the link:

 

It almost sounds like satire, but during a speech in Texas on Friday morning, the Republican candidate and frontrunner, Donald Trump said he wants to sue news outlets if they negative stories about him.

 

He acknowledged that currently the First Amendment of the Constitution protects a free press, and thus shields journalists from suits like this.

 

But Trump said on Friday that he would limit the press using litigation that would be permitted due to “opening up” libel laws and allowing them to include things like criticism and critiques that he doesn’t like.

 

“I think the media is among the most dishonest groups of people I’ve ever met,” Trump stated. “They’re terrible.” (Trump Promises Harsh Media Criticism of Him Will Be ILLEGAL If He’s President; By Counter Current News Editorial Team [too cowardly to pin a writer’s name]; Counter Current News; 2/27/16 9:51 am)

 

Time.com is a part of the Left Stream Media meaning it also provides slanted anti-Trump and pro-Crooked Hillary news bytes was a bit more even handed than Counter Current News:

 

Donald Trump won raucous cheers from his Fort Worth, Texas, crowd on Friday when he promised supporters that he would make it easier for them to sue journalists with whom they disagreed.

 

 

“One of the things I’m going to do if I win—and I hope we do, and we’re certainly leading—I’m going to open up our libel laws so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money,” Trump said of a litigation wave against major news organizations. “So when The New York Times writes a hit piece, which is a total disgrace, or when the Washington Post, which is there for other reasons writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they’re totally protected,” Trump said. (Donald Trump Promises to Make America Litigious Again; By Philip Elliott; Time.com; 2/26/16)

 

How is this an attack on the First Amendment? Trump is working within the law threatening litigation for a lack of honesty in reporting. It would not be a questionable Executive Order such as has President Barack Hussein Obama has done frequently in his bully politics.

 

  1. Just look at how he intends to shape society. He isn’t planning to free us to shape ourselves. He wants to do it himself with government authority.

Again Sifu you are confusing Trump’s government streamlining and waste-fighting with the Big Government despotism of Democrats under Obama. Which again, Crooked Hillary vows to continue:

 

 

 

 



  1. Trump plans to run the economy like he is used to running one of his businesses, NOT allowing the free market to work
    https://fee.org/articles/trump-s-economic-plan-higher-taxes-higher-inflation-and-higher-minimum-wage/?gclid=Cj0KEQjw3s6-BRC3kKL_86XDvq4BEiQAAUqtZ08FoUgqKY9afGUHmbY-aMZ9I66G8_CYHEaYydTHH_4aAuKA8P8HAQ

 

Hmm… The above link is largely the Dem talking points cherry picking Trump’s words and twisting them to offend Conservative Less-Government proponents. The whole article is such but here is an excerpt that mirrors Sifu’s above sentiments on the economy:

 

Usually presidents run on a platform of reforming government, cutting government, improving government, controlling government, etc.. After all, government — not the whole country — is their bailiwick.

 

But not Trump. He posits himself as the head of the whole country, running America the same ways he runs his businesses. He would stamp his name brand on the nation, as he does with everything else he owns, thereby imparting it with his own purported greatness. Probably the last president who was so open about his belief that he runs the nation was FDR himself. (Trump’s Economic Plan: Higher Taxes, Higher Inflation, and Higher Minimum Wage; By Jeffrey Tucker; Foundation for Economic Education; 5/9/16)

 

Now what gives weight to this evaluation by FEE is that the organization is guided by the Conservative/Libertarian thought of Austrian Economics. So the perspective definitely not Leftist, ergo kudos to Sifu for finding the Trump criticism. Nevertheless, I have said Trump is no Conservative in the traditional sense but rather an apolitical realist on making profitable deals that have little to do with ideology.

 

I wonder what FEE profiles about Hillary Clinton?

 

 

After years of toiling in the halls of power, the presidency finally seems hers for the taking. Yet, the closer Hillary comes to assuming the presidential chair, the closer Americans examine her public pose only to recoil.

 

 

In a word, many Americans find her “mendacious,” and the revelations regarding the appearance of the Clinton State Department’s “pay-to-play” scheme – delivering special access and favors to Clinton Foundation donors – is only the latest episode in a long series of scandals besmirching her trustworthiness.

 

The revelations – and there are more to come and they will never end – is shocking and not shocking. If you think government is good, clean, and constantly striving for the public good, seeing all this up close must be startling. Most thinking people long ago let go of their naïveté about government and therefore find nothing particularly surprising about any of this.

 

 

Where power may begin as simply a means to achieve one’s dreams, winning and wielding power ultimately becomes the dream itself. Compromise after compromise of principles is made for the sake of power. Sacrifice after sacrifice of others is offered for the sake of power. Lie after lie is told for the sake of keeping the truth of power-hungry dreams alive. One’s ideals become hollow pretense, mere words, and the curse of power takes hold, i.e. for every good deed done, two or three “necessary” evils must be committed.

 

Such appears to be the tragic tale of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

The Radical Turned Establishment Figure

 

In 1969, Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis, titled “There Is Only the Fight,” on the work of that now infamous radical, Saul Alinsky. … At the beginning of his own book, Rules for Radicals, Alinsky quotes himself:

 

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

 

That said, Hillary diverges with her role model Alinsky in her thesis on one crucial point. Rather than rebelling against the establishment to win her own kingdom, she would become the establishment. 

 

 

At this point, Hillary Clinton is, indeed, the establishment. 

 

 

Power Corrupts

 

Do Hillary Clinton’s “noble” ends justify her choice of means, her ambitions for state power?

 

In my opinion, the answer is a firm “no,” but I do not say this as something unique to Hillary Clinton. She comes from a long line of murderers and thieves dressed up in high ideals – the type of person Isabel Paterson once called the “humanitarian with the guillotine,” – those who, as Paterson wrote, cause great harm as “the result of their deliberate actions, long persevered in, which they hold to be motivated by high ideals toward virtuous ends.” In step, Hillary is quick to downplay her mistakes and the “collateral damage” left in her wake in the name of her “virtuous ends.”

 

 

Faith in state power and the corruption that follows may not be unique to Hillary Clinton – before writing Clinton Cash, author Peter Schweizer wrote another excellent book, Extortion, outlining how our dear public servants systematically use their political power to manipulate those they supposedly serve – but Hillary’s career in politics certainly provides a crash course in how such a faith corrupts.

 

Whether it be her support of NSA mass surveillance programs, her penchant to centrally plan the American economy through a morass of crony capitalists enabling job-killing policies, or the Clinton Foundation’s global pay-for-play scheme, Hillary has in many ways become the very establishment she used to dream of replacing. She makes the ‘69 establishment President Richard Nixon look like a domesticated pussy cat, as she escalates America’s imperial wars, facilitates arms deals for Clinton Foundation donors, and continually lies to the American public about her own record.

 

Break with Alinksy [sic]

 

When did Clinton READ ENTIRETY (Hillary Clinton: A Portrait of Power and Corruption; By Joey Clark; Foundation for Economic Education; 8/26/16)

 

Sifu, there is the reality of the matter according to FEE. The Austrian Economic organization does not Trump’s economic plan because the Trump numbers do not conform to the Austrian model, BUT Mrs. Clinton is soooo Crooked that our government would slide further into a quagmire of corruption and despotism to elicit Leftist utopian ideology by hook or crook.

 

I’ll go with FEE’s description of Crooked Hillary and give Donald Trump at least a chance!

 

  1. Everything he says/promises, he intends to do through government power. He intends to grow government and its authority.

Trump worked within the law.

Legal! = right

A thing can be legal and still not right. Look to his usage of eminent domain.

 

Hmm… Trump has been criticized for using eminent domain to bulldoze widow Vera Coking’s house for a Casino parking lot, right? Well, not actually factual:

 

A Ted Cruz TV ad says Donald Trump “colluded with Atlantic City insiders to bulldoze the home of an elderly widow” for a casino parking lot. Trump called that claim “false.” We wouldn’t go that far. He wanted to bulldoze the home but lost an eminent domain case. However, the ad leaves the false impression that the widow lost her home, and she didn’t.

 

After a long court battle, a New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled in favor of Vera Coking of Atlantic City and said that she could keep her home. Trump eventually decided not to fight the ruling.

 

 

Two months later, the CRDA officially dropped the case, deciding not to appeal the judge’s ruling because the Trump organization said it was no longer interested in the properties.

 

So, Coking was able to keep her home for more than a decade longer until she moved to a retirement facility in California. Her house in Atlantic City was purchased at auction for $530,000 in 2014… (Widow’s Home Wasn’t Bulldozed; By D’Angelo Gore; FactCheck.org [A project of Annenberg Public Policy Center – biased to the Left]; 1/25/16)

 

The Leftist Website Think Progress give Donald Trump kudos for his eminent domain in a GOP Primary debate:

 

Donald Trump made the case for eminent domain at Saturday night’s ABC debate, arguing for the government’s right to seize property for infrastructure projects in exchange for appropriate compensation.

 

“Eminent domain is an absolute necessity for a country for our country. 

 

Trump is right. Eminent domain paved the way for major infrastructure projects now taken for granted in the U.S. Water supplies, highways, subways, and other sprawling public projects required the government’s power to buy private land. … (Trump Makes Surprisingly Reasonable Defense Of Government Power; By Aviva Shen; Think Progress; 2/6/16)

 

I realize the American Left will not agree but it is my opinion a President would utilize government eminent domain for infrastructure and pipelines – job producing projects that Obama failed to institute and undoubtedly so would Crooked Hillary fail.

 

By the way Trump lost his imminent [sic] domain case and complied

So losing means his unethical attempt never happened? His character is less blemished because he was stopped by an external source? No, he is still THAT slimeball.

 

Hmm… Did Trump’s big business agenda kill anyone – ever? Crooked Hillary’s Foreign Policy agenda did kill people – Benghazi! Compare Trump’s “slimeball” accusation to nearly an entire adult life of Crooked Hillary scandals (right along with Slick Willie):

 

  1. Benghazi: Committing Perjury or Lying Under Oath

Hillary has repeatedly committed perjury or lied under oath throughout her career. One of the most telling examples was during her Benghazi testimony when she claimed a video had inspired a protest that ended up killing Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans. This was subsequently shown to be a lieHillary famously declared, “What difference does it make?” when the questioning got too tough, in regards to the causes of the American deaths and personnel she was supposedly in charge of protecting. She stated she had submitted all documents, but 20 months later, FOIA requests uncovered 41 new documents. Yet another lie.

 

  1. Faking Uncontrollable Fits of Coughing

Check out this compilation of clips where Hillary pretends she can’t stop coughing in order to avoid answering tough questions or testify on an issue at all. On the Benghazi issue, Clinton testified 4 months late to Congress.

 

  1. Email Gate: Illegally Mixing Government and Personal Emails

In the latest scandal over emails, dubbed Email Gate by some, Clinton set up a homebrew server to hold official Government property in terms of classified information. She also used her official Government work email to conduct private and personal business.

 

  1. Email Gate: Endangering National Security and State Secrets

Another aspect of Email Gate was the reckless endangering of Governmental secrets Clinton engaged in. Although many readers of The Freedom Articles will be all too aware of the way Government abuses the concept of national security, the fact remains that there is some need for it. Numerous officials have stated there is no doubt –zero ambiguity– that her emails endangered national security, due to the fact many were classified SAP (Special Access Program). However, she may have been doing this deliberately (see point 6).

 

  1. Email Gate:  Obstruction of Justice, Destruction of Evidence

Email Gate has many aspects to it. A further aspect is Hillary’s deliberate withholding (and deleting) of around 30,000 emails. Her excuse was that these were the personal, private ones, yet Congress had asked to see them all. Given what we know of Hillary as a cover up agent extraordinaire, what are the chances that she wasn’t deleting them to destroy information? It remains to be seen what will come of the deletion, since the FBI is reported to have the server and flash drives (with all the emails) in its possession.

 

  1. Selling State Secrets to Foreign Countries

Mike Rivero (WhatReallyHappened.com) puts forth impressive evidence that Hillary has deliberately sold US Government State secrets to foreign countries. She and Bill did this with China during Bill’s presidency. Hillary may also have intentionally set up her homebrew server with weak security that could easily be hacked, so that the hackers could get the information and Hillary could claim the problem was “weak or flawed security” rather than a deliberately set up situation to leak data.

 

  1. Bill the Rapist, Hillary the Coverup Agent

As I covered in the article Billary Clinton: Rapist and Coverup Team Par Excellence, Hillary has been covering up for Bill’s violent sexual escapades and rape for decades, threatening his female victims into silence, sometimes with death threats. Some of them have been outright killed.

 

  1. Failed Stint as Secretary of State 2009-2013

A State Department spokesperson could not point to a single tangible achievement by Clinton. Hillary wasted $80 million on an Afghan US consulate. She lost $6 billion due to improper filing of contracts. She refused to classify Boko Haram as a terrorist group, leading to the kidnapping of 300 school girls. She called off internal investigations into her State Department involving the endemic engagement of prostitutes by her security, drug use by State Department contractors and the US Ambassador to Belgium soliciting male child prostitutes.

 

  1. A Giant Whopper: Pretending to be Under Fire in Bosnia

Hillary claimed she was under attack by snipers when she landed in Tuzla, Bosnia, 1996, but subsequent CBS footage showed her walking calmly along the tarmac there and even stopping to greet a young girl. Liar, liar, pants on fire.

 

  1. Flip-Flopping: NAFTA

This video (also embedded above) shows how Hillary has flip-flopped on the issue of NAFTA, saying to some people that she favored it (“NAFTA has proven its worth”) while saying to others she opposed it (“I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning”). Anything to get elected!

 

  1. More Lies: Gun or No Gun?

In the same video, Hillary claimed her grandfather taught her to shoot, yet later on, claimed she grew up in a house without any guns. Which is it?

 

  1. More Lies: Bringing Peace to Northern Ireland?

Hillary claimed she brought Protestants and Catholics together in a Town Hall meeting for the first time. However, as this video states, “negotiators from the parties that helped broker the Good Friday agreement in 1998 told the Daily Telegraph that her role was peripheral and that she played no part in the grueling political talks over the years.”

 

  1. Flip-Flopping: Marriage Equality

Hillary has variously claimed that she opposes gay marriage and supports gay marriage at different times. It’s all about opportunism and pandering to a political base.

 

  1. Hillary during Watergate Investigations: An “Unethical, Dishonest Lawyer”

Bill Clinton was asked to serve on the special staff to handle the Nixon impeachment inquiry. He declined and suggested they hire his girlfriend Hillary Rodham instead. As Mike Rivero writes:

 

Hillary Clinton was later fired from the staff of the House Judiciary committee investigating the Watergate scandal in 1974. She was fired by her supervisor, lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, who stated, “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer,” he said. “She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” Zeifman refused to give Clinton a letter of recommendation, one of only three employees he refused during his entire career.”

 

  1. Blood Gate: Selling AIDS-Infected Blood

When Bill Clinton became Governor of Arkansas, he awarded a fat contract to a Little Rock company called Health Management Associates (HMA). The company was paid $3 million a year for “medical services” for the state’s prison system. The game was to pay prisoners for their blood ($7 per pint) then resell it at massive profits on the international plasma market ($50 a pint). HMA’s entry into the blood market coincided with the rise of AIDS in America, but HMA did not screen the prisoners’ blood, even after the FDA issued special alerts about the higher incidents of AIDS and hepatitis in prison populations. In Canada alone, more than 7,000 people died from contaminated blood transfusions, many of them hemophiliacs. More than 4,000 of them died of AIDS. In 1986, public outrage forced the cancellation of HMA’s contract.

 

  1. Whitewater Scandal

The Whitewater Scandal involved Bill using the power of office of Governor of Arkansas to build public roads to the Clintons’ private land. The Clintons and McDougals made money with real estate contracts for Whitewater property that included harsh clauses. This resulted in elderly buyers defaulting on land payments and repossessions. The habit of using State power to personally enrich themselves is a very common theme running through the Clintons’ careers.

 

Hillary was the first woman ever subpoenaed by a Grand Jury in relation to Whitewater. Pervasive conflicts of interest were discovered between Rose Law Firm (Hillary) and Madison Guaranty (McDougal). Billing records disappeared (presumed stolen) from Vince Foster’s office the night he died. They reappeared in the Clinton residence following their acquittal, covered with Hillary’s fingerprints. Susan McDougal refused to testify against the Clintons, so went to prison, but was pardoned by President Bill. 15 Clinton friends were found guilty of 40 federal crimes. This cost US taxpayers around $145 million.

 

  1. Cattle Gate: Insider Trading – Hillary’s Magical Trade

Hillary invested $1000 and turned it into $100,000 through insider trading. She entered and exited the market at the exact right time. According to economists at Auburn and Nth Florida University, 1995, who concluded in their study in the Journal of Economics and Statistics, the probability of Hillary’s trade being genuine and not an insider trade was 1 in 250,000,000! The broker involved was given a 3 year suspension.

 

The trade was connected to Tyson Foods, the largest employer in Arkansas and a big Clinton donor.

 

  1. Eliminating Drug Testing at the White House

In an effort, no doubt, to avoid embarrassment over Bill’s cocaine-snorting habits, the Clintons eliminated random drug testing at the White House through the appointment Patsy Thomasson.

 

  1. File Gate: The Clintons’ Enemy List

The Clinton Administration improperly requested and received FBI background reports on 900 Republican officials in 1996. These FBI files contained sensitive information on average American citizens. It turned into a “Compilations of Enemies” list. Hillary was the source of the requests. The NYT called Hillary a “congenital liar”. Congressman Bob Barr commented:

 

“Clearly what the Clinton Administration is trying to do is an orchestrated systematic effort to thwart justice, to thwart the rule of law, to thwart legitimate investigations by the Congress, whether it is impeachment proceedings or regular oversight  to derail investigations (and) derail prosecutions.”

 

  1. China Gate: The China Connection

Bill Clinton and Al Gore took money from rich Chinese donors who ran prostitution rings. Again in 1996, agents of the Chinese Government and military funneled money into the Clinton re-election campaign, Clinton Legal Defense Fund and Democratic National Committee, in violation of US law.

 

  1. Prison Population Explosion under Bill

The total prison population increased by 673,000 people under Clinton’s tenure or by 235,000 more than it did under President Ronald Reagan, according to a study by the Justice Policy Institute.

 

READ 23 MORE (44 Reasons to NOT Elect Hillary Clinton;Makia Freeman– Editor; The Freedom Articles [Conspiracy Theory site, but I’m smoke/fire kind of guy]; 2/4/16)

 

A Crooked Hillary/Slick Willie list dwarfs any scandal linked to Trump primarily because the Clinton scandals demonstrate a Teflon get-out-of-jail elitism. Trump hasn’t even been close to felonious jail and potential treasonous activities.

He also donating money to Republicans. The donations demonstrate advancing his business goals and profiting his investors. That’s not politics,

Having no principles and going as the wind blows to maximize your personal desires? That is the ESSENCE of “political”.

 

Sifu there is a vast difference office politics in business and politics in government or at least government in America. Office politics is accountable to the Board of Directors, Shareholders and/or the Boss. Politics in government in America are accountable to the voters Constitutionally known as WE THE PEOPLE. The Dems have lost the concept of voter accountability. Unfortunately, I believe, the Establishment Republicans have lost that concept as well. Politics is the art of power agenda to achieve an agenda that can be good or nefarious. I am uncertain if Trump has use Office Politics to break any laws. He certainly has been challenged on a civil level and he has done his share of civil challenges as well. The Clinton clan can easily be called a crime family due to the prosecutions they slinked out of and the prosecutions that never went forward. THAT THE ESSENCE OF CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT!

Your blog is attempting to make me sign up for a new g+ account to comment, so my comments will have to remain here.

 

Sifu I apologize for your G+ issue. That is truly odd there is a Google demand to sign up for a new account apart from the one you already have.

Trump the same as a Dem Administration?


Emphatically NO!

donald-trump-america-first 

John R. Houk

© October 12, 2016

 

Sifu is a Google+ comment contributor that usually makes a reasonable stand when he disagrees with me rather than a hysterical ad hominem attack. I appreciated that. Even though I do disagree.

 

These comments are between Sifu and I relating to the post “Trump vs. Crooked Hillary – Conservative vs. Leftist”. Sifu’s thoughts are in normal text and mine are in bold text as well as being indented.

 

JRH 10/12/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

Sifu Mode

22 hours ago

 

+John Houk He supports massive growth of government. That is his vision of “great”. How is that so different than Obama? Maybe he won’t be as weak. Maybe he will be rabidly nationalist. How are those necessarily good? Putin isn’t weak. Doesn’t make him good. Hitler was nationalist. Didn’t make him good. His goals are still very much in alignment with the liberals. Look at his recent history of support publicly and financially for Hillary and others on the left.

 

Hmm… I don’t see any massive growth of government EXCEPT in terms of an efficient military and National Security. In terms of National Debt and Gross Domestic Production I see government decrease. Obama is a globalist tending toward ending National Sovereignty – Crooked Hillary too. Is Trump a rabid Nationalist? NO, he is an America First Nationalist. Trump admires Putin’s leadership skills NOT his Russian imperialistic agenda. Trump is not Hitler! Hitler wanted a Socialist Despotic Aryan German Empire where nations were subservient and Jews dead. Trump wants to keep America good without Multiculturalist globalism destroying American exceptionalism. Trump’s goals are VERY MUCH unaligned with the American Left that supports the globalism of NAFTA and TPP! Trump supported the Clintons when it would benefit his business. He paid to get Clintons to play. The play benefited Clintons financially while charging for government favors. It is legal to donate. It is illegal to play for pay in government. It’s called corruption.

Those qualities can be good or bad. It depends on the underlying principles they are used to accomplish. Trump’s only consistent principle is to HIS PERSONAL DESIRES; see his history of the use of eminent domain. His ego and selfishness do nothing to inspire hope that those qualities would be used for good.

 

Trump worked within the law. Bill and Hillary worked outside the law and used power to become Teflon so no charges were filed. By the way Trump lost his imminent domain case and complied. Bill and Hillary LIED and people have died and American foreign policy has is in full disarray. Trump’s business is just fine.



Trump apolitical? That’s laughable. He is not PC, but that does NOT mean apolitical. He is VERY well versed in navigating politics and manipulating people to get what he wants. He is a very political personality; he simply hasn’t held office before.

 

Hmm … I believe history proves that wrong Sifu. You yourself mentioned how he has donating money to Dems. He also donating money to Republicans. The donations demonstrate advancing his business goals and profiting his investors. That’s not politics, that’s solid business in the realm of profit and loss. In America we call that Capitalism. Capitalism has made America wealthy enough that foreigners who hate us want to dip into that wealth by hook or by crook (mostly crook). Donald Trump at worst is a business personality and not a power-grabbing-monger like the Clinton clan.

 

This is the Crooked Hillary too Many Want to be POTUS


remember-hillary-is-crooked

John R. Houk

© October 9, 2016

 

The Left Stream Media, many Establishment Republicans and NeverTrumpers Conservatives have been hammering Donald Trump about his deplorable womanizing remarks back in 2005. The Left Stream Media reporting on Trump’s past is quite unsurprising.

 

I am very disappointed in Republicans and Conservatives that have decided to abandon Trump because of a past moral issue but have been quite feckless in going after Crooked Hillary and Sex-Predator Slick Willie – the Leftist wife/husband team – for way over a quarter century.

Marxist Saul Alinsky and a young Crooked Hillary

saul-alinsky-crooked-hillary-2

 

Below are two articles relating to Crooked Hillary’s political ideology (Marxism) and the obvious Teflon fix that publicly came FBI Director James Comey but was more than likely ordered by Leftist-in-Chief and filtered on down through the Attorney General lackey Loretta Lynch.

 

And trust me, these two articles are just the tip of the iceberg of the nefariousness of Crooked Hillary. The most recent exposé of documents linked directly to Hillary nefariousness are not mentioned in this post. Of course the Obama Administration and probably the Crooked Hillary campaign are doing the bait and switch tactic without evidence of proof that the Russians did the hack then rewrote the email dump to implicate the queen of corruption. Remember the Benghazi and Obamacare lies before you believe the accusations implicating the Russians.

 

JRH 10/9/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

Hillary Clinton, A Communist?

 

By LEON PUISSEGUR

OCTOBER 7, 2016

Freedom Outpost

 

If one looks into her strange past, one finds that Hillary Rodham Clinton had a close relationship with a radical and Communist/Socialist by the name of Saul Alinsky.

 

We will present a lot to be digested and we hope people read this article all the way through and go to the sites shown so they will know the truth about Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, both of which seem to be so closely aligned with the Communist Party that any lines that once divided them can no longer be found, and even their platforms are nearly identical.

 

We showed how Hillary Clinton had close ties to Saul Alinsky in previous articles here and here. Yes, Hillary wrote and sat with Saul Alinsky to not only study his Communist ideology, but also to use it in her quest for power and control, both of which give the Communist ideology roots to grow from.

 

Let us show the basic principles of Hillary Clinton’s idol, Saul Alinsky. Please take note of the 8 different ways that Communist Saul Alinsky wants to “Change” the way the United States operates. Let us look very closely at the ideas of Saul Alinsky and compare them to what both Hillary Rodham Clinton and Obama have done in relation to the 8 ideas of Saul Alinsky.

 

Saul Alinsky stated, “There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important!”

 

1)      Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

2)      Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible. Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3)      Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4)      Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5)      Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6)      Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7)      Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

8)      Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

 

Now let us take a look at what has already happened and what Hillary Clinton wants to do and what Obama and the Democratic Party has already done.  You have to remember that anytime words such as, but not limited to, “Racist,” “Feminist,” etc., are key words used by the Saul Alinsky model to destroy your enemy and keep them fighting to disconnect those ideas from them while those making the statements continue on with their ideas, which, in most cases, do not help the poor or the United States.

 

Here is the connection between Hillary Clinton and her idol, Saul Alinsky:

 

Healthcare – We see the first idea to be pushed by the Alinsky Communist idea is to “Control Healthcare.” Remember, when Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she pushed for a nationwide Healthcare system, exactly what Alinsky outlined to begin the creation of the Socialist/Communist state. We should make a strong note: President Obama was also a strong advocate of the Alinsky model. Today, we have the Obamacare joke of healthcare, but it does follow the Saul Alinsky ideology.

 

Poverty – Today, we see that more people live in poverty in the United States, and this has increased since Obama took office, so here we can clearly see that the second action in the Alinsky model is being pursued by Obama and we can rest assured that Hillary Clinton will push this even higher if she is elected; after all, she supports the Alinsky ideology.

 

Debt – The debt of our nation has moved into territory that has never been seen before during the entire history of the United States.  Hillary Clinton wants to continue on this same line of action by increasing the burden by keeping the debt rising so she can control all of our lives. Hillary Clinton also shouted very loudly on the stage; “We will raise the taxes on the middle class.” Strangely, the people cheered!

 

Gun Control – This is so far the hardest to complete, but Obama has done all he can, including coming up with illegal Executive Actions that stifle the ownership of guns because of his actions. But Hillary Clinton stated that she would like to see “common sense” gun control, which is code for taking all the guns from the people. Hillary Clinton has stated that, “… I would like to see gun control actions like the Australians have.” That would mean total confiscation of guns and jail time for anyone who does not comply with the government demand to turn your guns in. Hillary Clinton can do this by placing Supreme Court Justices that will say the Second Amendment does not apply to the average citizen – check out the people she will consider for Supreme Court Justices: they all are AGAINST guns.

 

Welfare – This will and has been growing since Obama has been president. Under Hillary Clinton, it will continue to grow, since she has stated this in many ways and will increase the welfare rolls, just like Alinsky states. Hillary Clinton will bring in many more people from the Middle East and place them all on the welfare rolls, giving them no opportunity to find jobs and by giving them food, housing, and income, just like her idol Saul Alinsky outlines in his 8 levels of control.

 

Education – Hillary Clinton has clearly stated in her book, It Take A Village“I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise the children. Parents have a secondary role.”

 

Here Hillary Clinton shows very plainly that she will use the Communist/Socialist Saul Alinsky ideology to “educate” the children, which is actually brainwashing the children to think that they have to work for the Government to pay for their education. This alone should make many parents consider not to vote for this lady who only wants the parents to have a secondary role to their children and allow the government to have the primary role. This is not the “American” way to Freedom and pursuit of happiness.

 

Religion – This is the most profound act of hatred by the current administration, and Hillary Clinton will follow through with this ideology, just like Obama is doing now.  Before 2009, our nation could pray at football games, we could place a cross on public property, we could worship our beliefs, which are, of the majority, Christian. Today, our nation has moved away from the old phrase “God and Country.” Today, it is “Politics and country.” Our nation was founded on the belief that God is our creator, and that is clearly displayed through the Declaration of Independence.  Some will come out and say that is not right because the Constitution says the government cannot support any religion.  That would be a very false statement, since the very idea was that the Government cannot say we have only one religion, and that is the one the government says it is.  Freedom of religion was developed to make sure the government did not dictate what religion the people had to abide by: that is what England did, and the founding fathers did not want the government to dictate what religion to force upon the people.  It also did not mean that the government would make religion be evil and not accepted by the government, as it has done under the Obama administration. This would be even worse under a Hillary Clinton administration.

 

Class warfare – We can already see this one from Obama and Hillary Clinton doubling down and saying that the rich have to pay their fair share, meaning, as did Saul Alinsky, that they have to pay more until they become poor. The fact that Hillary Clinton is going to continue on with the “Class Warfare” is not to be doubted for one minute as she does not hide this at all, saying those who make the most should pay the most. Hillary Clinton will most assuredly divide the nation even more than Obama has, and this will never be settled until the United States is so divided that the government will have to intervene to “separate” what they created: a police state.

 

Showing and comparing these 8 items and breaking them down shows that, without a doubt, Obama, who also studied Saul Alinsky, began the division needed to make the Communist ideology work, and Hillary Clinton will continue it.  If you wish to see our nation coming together like it did before Obama got into office, do not vote for Hillary Clinton.

 

How much does the Communist Party of America support Hillary Clinton?  That is perhaps the most interesting question we could ask. Let us look at an article exposing the fact that the Communist Party supports Hillary Clinton.

 

This article describes what the Communist Party USA likes about her and why it supports her entirely.

 

“The Communist Party USA may not control many actual votes, but what they lack in support is made up for in enthusiasm.

 

That passion was in full display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering their national political convention last month. And their convention was the Democratic National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.”

 

Some of the Communist Party USA’s talking points sound an awful lot like Hillary Clinton’s talking points…or is that the other way around? In either case, the points are eerily similar. Let’s check some excerpts from the Communist Party’s article on that.

 

“Donald Trump steals wages. He’d pick your pocket in a New York minute. He lies and spreads hate. He’s a racist and a bully.”

 

“Do not underestimate Trump and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was surprised by the successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are united in purpose: delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability and violence against working-class people of all races, genders, religions and sexual orientations. They are united with giant corporations and the billionaire class in their drive to lower wages and living conditions and increase their profits and power.”

 

“With Senator Bernie Sanders endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message was loud and clear, “We’re stronger together.” That is what it will take to win in November.”

 

“The union movement, communities of color, students, women, progressives and the newborn “political revolution” can help generate voter enthusiasm by talking and tweeting about Clinton and the issues. Challenging sexism is a must as well as racism, which has been a coded (and overt) staple of presidential elections for decades.”

 

“Winning in a landslide” is needed now more than ever, and that landslide for Clinton could swing control of the Senate to Democrats, and other potential positive effects could be felt on the ‘down ballot’ congressional and state races.”

 

Wait, isn’t that what the Democratic Party said – well maybe in different words?  It does look like Hillary Clinton has taken advice from the Communist Party of the USA with her lines. All this time and the people have been led to believe that Hillary Clinton was the first to use the words “racism,” “sexism,” and so on. Please just look at what the Communist Party states: if it were not on their web site, one would think it had been written by the Clinton Campaign.

 

Let us look at a direct quote of the Communist Party USA paper that describes Hillary Clinton’s pick for her running mate, Tim Kaine: this is where it gets weird, as the Communist Party not only fully supports and maybe helps Hillary Clinton, but also seems to accept her VP, Tim Kaine, with open arms.

 

“Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.

 

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

 

It would seem that Hillary Clinton is either working with the Communist Party USA, or they are working with her. No one can really distinguish the lines between them, as they are so close to each other that lines between Democrats and Communists have seemingly vanished since, in 2009, they pushed voters toward Obama and keep pushing the Democrats into the now very blurred lines between the old Democratic Party and the current Communist/Democratic Party today. But check it out for yourself below.

 

“The Communists, who for decades ran their own candidates for president and vice president but supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary and Bernie. The party also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine.

 

“He’s a great choice,” wrote staffer Larry Rubin on the first day of the convention. “Kaine pushed the political envelope of Virginia, an erstwhile red southern state, in a progressive direction – and won! He was elected mayor of Richmond, then governor of the state and then senator. Everyone agrees: he’s a sincere, nice guy.”

 

No this should be enough to show that our nation would become totally Socialist leaning heavily towards Communism under Hillary Rodham Clinton, due to Democrats continuing on with their ideas from 1856 when they were the party of slavery. Wait, maybe they really want to bring slavery back, but in the form of government hand outs! Just check out someone else’s comments on how the Democrats have moved more toward the Communist side than to the Freedom side.

 

“David Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties: “Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.

 

“If that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”

 

The interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Alinsky and his work.

 

Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist.

 

Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.”

 

This covers a lot, but it has to be shown in order to link it all together to illustrate the closeness of the Communist and Democratic Party and how it may also link Hillary Clinton to being a communist simply by allowing this type of hyperbole to be stated. We show just what has to be shown, and it makes a good connection to the Hillary Clinton campaign, which follows the Communist Party USA ideology almost to a tee.  That in and of itself should create a firewall between the White House and Hillary Clinton.  If she is elected, the nation built by our forefathers will have failed, due to the ignorance of seeing what is near the tip of our noses. If you believe in the Freedom, the Constitution, and our United States, then you will pass this on to all you know and make it go viral to show facts that have to be shown here because the Lame Stream Media will never show, it as they are part of the problem.

 

“Clinton was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.

 

Last year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.

 

Dick Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”

 

“The revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.

 

David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.

 

“When radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.

 

Interestingly, the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the Democratic Party.

 

The drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

 

“One of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”

 

Farah reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.

 

“Back then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – – was “Red Revolution” sung to the tune of “Red, Red Robbin.”

 

“For those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,’” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”

 

Meanwhile, an email sent out by the Communist Party USA over the weekend had this to say: “The 2016 elections are in full swing. Many of our districts and clubs and members are actively participating in the campaign to strike a blow to the extreme right and defeat Donald Trump and other down ballot GOP extremists. If you’re not yet involved, there are many ways to get connected with labor and our allies, especially in the key battleground states and in targeted congressional and state legislative races. But no matter where you live you can be part of this exciting election. We can defeat Trump, oust right-wing majorities in Congress and statehouses while also building powerful labor-led people’s movements, advancing a progressive agenda and political independence at the grassroots. We have some great tools, beginning with People’s World daily (sic) Marxist analysis.”

 

(Source)

__________________

FBI agents are ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe

 

hillary-clinton-and-fbi-director-james-comey-photo-getty-images

Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey Photo: Getty Images

 

By Paul Sperry

October 6, 2016

The Counter Jihad Report

Originally New York Post

 

Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly” whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private e-mail server.

 

Feeling the heat from congressional critics, Comey last week argued that the case was investigated by career FBI agents, “So if I blew it, they blew it, too.”

 

But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.

 

“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer-investigations unit.

 

Instead of going to prosecutors and insisting on using grand jury leverage to compel testimony and seize evidence, Comey allowed immunity for several key witnesses, including potential targets.

 

The immunity agreements came with outrageous side deals, including preventing agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when she communicated with the server administrator who destroyed subpoenaed e-mails.

 

Comey also agreed to have Mills’ laptop destroyed after the restricted search, denying Congress the chance to look at it and making the FBI an accomplice to the destruction of evidence.

 

Comey’s immunized witnesses nonetheless suffered chronic lapses in memory, made unsubstantiated claims of attorney-client privilege upon tougher questioning and at least two gave demonstrably false statements. And yet Comey indulged it all.

 

What’s more, Comey cut a deal to give Clinton a “voluntary” witness interview on a major holiday, and even let her ex-chief of staff sit in on the interview as a lawyer, even though she, too, was under investigation.

 

Clinton’s interview, the culmination of a yearlong investigation, lasted just 3 ½ hours. Despite some 40 bouts of amnesia, she wasn’t called back for questioning; and three days later, Comey cleared her of criminal wrongdoing.

 

“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold director Comey responsible.”

 

Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

 

The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”

 

“Each month for 27 years, I received oral and computer admonishments concerning the proper protocol for handling top secret and other classified material, and was informed of the harsh penalties, to include prosecution and incarceration” for mishandling such material, he pointed out. “Had myself or my colleagues engaged in behavior of the magnitude of Hillary Clinton, as described by Comey, we would be serving time in Leavenworth.”

 

Former FBI official I.C. Smith knows a thing or two about Clinton corruption. After working at FBI headquarters as a section chief in the National Security Division, he retired as special agent in charge of the Little Rock, Ark., field office, where he investigated top Clinton fund-raisers for public corruption and even Chinese espionage.

 

“FBI agents upset with Comey’s decision have every reason to feel that way,” Smith said. “Clearly there was a different standard applied to Clinton.”

 

“I have no doubt resourceful prosecutors and FBI agents could have come up with some charge that she would have been subject to prosecution,” the 25-year veteran added. “What she did is absolutely abhorrent for anyone who has access to classified information.”

 

Smith said Congress should subpoena the case’s agents to testify about the direction they received from Comey and their supervisors: “It would be interesting to see what the results would be if those involved with the investigation were questioned under oath.”

 

Comey made the 25 agents who worked on the case sign nondisclosure agreements. But others say morale has sunk inside the bureau.

 

“The director is giving the bureau a bad rap with all the gaps in the investigation,” one agent in the Washington field office said. “There’s a perception that the FBI has been politicized and let down the country.”

 

Comey has turned a once-proud institution known for its independence into one that bows to election pressure, hands out political immunity to candidates and effectively pardons their co-conspirators. He’s turned the FBI into the Federal Bureau of Immunity and lost the trust and respect of not only his agents but the country at large. He ought to step down.

 

Paul Sperry, formerly Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, is author of “Infiltration.”

 

Also see:

 

 

______________

This is the Crooked Hillary too Many Want to be POTUS

John R. Houk

© October 9, 2016

_______________

Hillary Clinton, A Communist?

 

Copyright © 2016 FreedomOutpost.com

_____________

FBI agents are ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe

 

About Counter Jihad Report

 

There is an urgent need for the public to become informed about the Global Islamic Jihad Movement. We must demand from our leaders that they become familiar with Islamic Law and jihadist ideology so that our counterterrorism policies can better protect us from this growing threat.

 

This blog is mainly a news aggregating site but also includes an extensive library of resources for studying Islam and networking with other Counter Jihad activists. My goal has been to pull from a variety of the most trusted and reliable sources to educate the public on the counter jihad movement. The many RSS feeds and counterjihad twitter feed in the sidebar are meant to provide a time saving jumping off point to access all the headlines and breaking news.

 

My Interest in Islamic Jihad stems from the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in which my cousin, Ken Haas, was killed. Ken left a career as a philosophy professor to work for the CIA and was the Station Chief in Beirut. He and his wife of one year had just finished lunch in Ken’s office at the Embassy and kissed good-bye. She had driven back to their apartment where she heard the explosion. After several agonizing days of waiting while rescuers sifted through the wreckage it was finally revealed that Ken had died instantly at his desk.

 

In all, 63 people were killed, 17 of whom were Americans. The entire U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Middle Eastern contingent was killed setting our intelligence back for years. Hezbollah had READ THE REST 

 

Tabloid Smoke Means There is Fire – SOMEWHERE!


liar-liar-pants-suit-fire

John R. Houk

© October 6, 2016

 

Okay, here’s some tabloid stuff on Slick Willie (aka Bill Clinton). Honestly, it is my opinion most of this stuff is conjecture based on the few cases in which Slick had to pay hush money legally or under the table because he couldn’t keep his business in his trousers.

 

Regardless of the truth or speculation or the unfilled blanks between the two, Slick’s skirt chasing of willing and unwilling participants is a moral blight that Crooked Hillary has spent most of her married life maliciously defaming female victims and female willing adulteresses.

 

Crooked Hillary has been Slick’s huge enabler rather than Slick’s betrayed by adultery wife. This makes her as much as a moral reprobate as her husband former President William J. Clinton. Deluded Dem voters look the other way out of Party loyalty. Looking the other way is SHAMEFUL!

 

Donald Trump probably is the perfect alternative to Crooked Hillary, but his business success (yes, including recovery from bankruptcy) and his tapping into the pulse of unhappy with status quo Americans deserves a higher opportunity than the nefarious past of the Clinton husband/wife duo elitist criminality protection.

 

Criminals don’t have constituents they have victims. Political criminals only care about their agenda and NOT the rule of law.

 

JRH 10/6/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Bill Clinton Affair with Vice President’s Daughter: REVEALED

 

By Sean A.

August 6, 2016

JumpVibes.com

 

BILL CLINTON’S AFFAIRS

bill-clintons-affairs-shshing

 

Within his inner circle, our 42nd two-term President of the United States has been known to have had numerous affairs during his 8 year residence at the White House.  Staffers were well aware that Bill was having a female “guest” within the Oval office when Secret Service agents guarded the entrance.  The biggest question is why didn’t Hillary Clinton demand a divorce from Bill.  Even when the Monica Lewinsky affair leaked to the public and almost lead to the first Presidential Impeachment in U.S history, why did Hillary choose to stay.

 

We will reveal this shocking answer and more but let’s first look at the Bill’s many lovers…

 

MONICA LEWINSKY

monica-bill

 

In her testimony, Monica alleged that between 1995 and 1997, she had nine sexual encounters with Bill Clinton in the Oval Office while he was the residing President Of The United States.

 

GENNIFER FLOWERS

gennifer-flowers

 

Gennifer met Bill in 1977 as a new reporter for KARK-TV in Little Rock, Arkansas and began to have a sexual relationship with Billed that lasted twelve years.

 

MARIA FURTWÄNGLER

maria-furtwangler-bill

 

A German physician and television actress, Maria met Bill through her husband, Dr. Hubert Burda, and started their “meetings” after Maria grew fond of Bill’s elegant speeches.

 

BELINDA STRONACH (Gawker Photo)

bill-belinda-stronach

 

A Canadian businesswoman, philanthropist and politician, Belinda started dating Bill after sharing an “intimate dinner” in 2002.

 

NAOMI ROBSON

naomi-robson

 

Naomi is an Australian TV presenter best known for the East Coast edition of Today Tonight and got introduced to Bill in 2006 through a mutual friend.

 

ELIZABETH HURLEY

bill-elizabeth-hurley

 

Actress Elizabeth Hurley was introduced to Bill through actor Tom Sizemore and was rumored to have had a 1 year affair with Bill after flying her to the White House in 1998.

 

MARKIE POST

bill-hillary-markie-post

 

Markie helped produce a Disney Channel program marking Bill’s first inauguration.  Markie, Hillary, and Bill are known to be close friends until Bill and Markie began having “secret get-togethers in California hotels.”

 

PATRICIA DUFF

bill-patricia-duff

 

As a political activist, Patricia was instrumental to introducing Bill to the L.A. Democratic Party supporters in the mid-1980s.  Their encounters grew along with their efforts to help Bill gain a foothold in becoming President.

 

ELIZABETH WARD GRACEN

elizabeth-ward-gracen

 

An American actress, Gracen claimed to have had a one night stand with Bill Clinton in 1992 while she was studying acting in New York.

 

EILEEN WELLSTONE

eileen-wellstone

 

Eileen alleged that 23 year old future President sexually assaulted her at a pub near Oxford University.  Bill admitted to the encounter but claimed it was consensual.

 

SALLY PERDUE

sally-perdue

 

A former Miss America finalist, Sally had an affair with the then-governor Bill in 1983 and was asked not to reveal the affair by a former Democratic party staffer.

 

DOLLY KYLE BROWNING

bill-dolly-kyle-browning

 

Dolly and Bill had known each other since High School.  Their sexual relationship was ongoing between mid 1970s to 1992 when Bill stopped returning Dolly’s calls.

 

PAULA JONES

paula-jones-newsweek

 

Paula sued Bill for sexual harassment and eventually settled out of court for $850,000.  In his testimony, Paul claimed Bill gave her a note with his phone number.  When she went to see him, he tried to make moves on her.

 

CHRISTY ZERCHER

christy-zercher-daily-news

 

During the 1992 campaign for President, steward Christy Zercher stated Bill fondled her on the plane flight while Hillary slept just a few feet away.

 

JUANITA BROADDRICK

juanita-broaddrick

 

Juanita Broaddrick claimed that Bill raped her when she was a volunteer on his campaign for Governor.  Norma Rodgers who shared a hotel with Juanita confirms Juanita’s claims of a sexual assault.

 

REGINA HOPPER BLAKELY

regina-hopper-blakely

 

The current President and CEO of America’s Natural Gas Alliance, Regina came forward and admitted having a consensual relationship with Bill in the later 70’s.

 

ROBYN DICKEY

robyn-dickey

 

Robyn was an administrator at the Governor’s mansion when Bill was the Governor of Arkansas and admitted to have a consensual relationship with Bill during her stay.

 

CAROLYN MOFFET

carolyn-moffet-bill

 

Carolyn Moffet was a legal secretary in Little Rock, Arkansas where she met the Governor at a fundraiser.  Moffet alleges that Bill invited her to his room and demand sexual acts from her.

 

KATHLEEN WILLEY

kathleen-willey

 

In March of 1998, Kathleen was a White House volunteer aide who admitted on the TV program 60 minutes that Bill had sexually assaulted her during his first term as President.

 

CONNIE HAMZY

connie-hamzy

 

In 1984, rock’n roll groupie Connie Hamzy claimed then-Governor Clinton said he wanted to bring her to his hotel room.  Bill naturally later denied those claims.

 

ANDREA CATSIMATIDIS (Left- Bill & adult Catsimatidis & Right Bill & teenage Catsimatidis)

left-bill-adult-catsimatdis-right-bill-teenage-catsimatdis

 

Andrea Catsimatidis file divorce from Christopher Nixon Cox, grandson of President Richard Nixon.  It was never proven that Bill Clinton had anything to do with the divorce, but his close proximity and the grip he has on her arm makes us wonder.

 

ARIELLE AVDALI

arielle-avdali-bill

 

Arielle Avdali uploaded the image to social media with the caption “Billy boy checking on my tatas”. The picture should speak for itself.

 

ELEANOR MONDALE

eleanor-mondale

 

Eleanor, daughter of former Vice President Walter Mondale, kept a diary that detailed her romantic encounters with Bill Clinton.  This affair reportedly made Monica Lewinsky furious because Monica thought she was Bill’s only mistress at the time.

 

LAWSUITS

lawsuit-gals

 

Countless women have accused Clinton of making unwanted sexual advances and sexually harassing them dating back to 1970s.

 

APOLOGY?

apology-for-lyng-about-monica-daily-news

 

Having gotten caught lying under oath, Bill had no other option but publicly announce to the grand jury and the nation that he had in fact being lying the entire time about the Monica Lewinsky affair.  He has no mention of his other lawsuits and affairs.

 

HILLARY’S LOYALTY

wonder-about-hillarys-loyalty-crying-like-victim

 

The big question remains.  Despite all these public and private displays of infidelity from Bill, why does Hillary still remain in the marriage.

 

The answer is evident in Hillary’s Presidential aspirations.  Hillary has always had the desire to reach the highest office in the land – The White House.  It is a mere political partnership at this point as Bill, a popular former two-term president, has a huge sway in public opinion polls to help Hillary achieve this goal.

 

Please let us know what you think of Hillary’s persistence in maintaining the marriage in the comments below.

 

______________

Tabloid Smoke Means There is Fire – SOMEWHERE!

John R. Houk

© October 6, 2016

____________

Bill Clinton Affair with Vice President’s Daughter: REVEALED

 

Home Page: http://www.upvibes.com/