Charlottesville Violent Participants Pt TWO


By John R. Houk

© August 17, 2017

 

On Wednesday 8/16/17, I posted Part ONE which I took a look at the racist participants of the Charlottesville rumble of Neo-Nazis, KKK and White Supremacist Nationalists spewing their odious ideology using the excuse of preserve the American history embodied by the Confederacy.

 

Clearly these White Supremacist racists were more interested in odious propaganda than in preserving history. Check out the racist sloganeering a couple of days before the Charlottesville VA rumble at nearby University of Virginia:

 

VIDEO: 8/12/17 White NEO-NAZI March at University of Virginia Chanting Nazi Slogans

 

Posted by GrimReaperNextDoor

Published on Aug 12, 2017

 

A group of white nationalists sparked outrage on a college campus in Virginia on Friday after the marched with torches across campus while chanting Nazi expressions.

The demonstrators marched on the campus grounds at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville late Friday as precursor to a Saturday protest planned to publicly oppose the removal of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

Marches could be heard chanting slogans including “white lives matter” and “you will not replace us.” Others could be heard chanting “blood and soil,” a well-known Nazi rallying cry. Police eventually declared the protest an unlawful assembly and both protesters and counter protesters reported being pepper sprayed.

Some videos captured at the scene appeared to show counter protesters clashing with the white nationalists.

University of Virginia president Teresa A. Sullivan condemned the READ THE REST

 

Ergo, the racist march at U of V seems like incitement practice in Charlottesville.

 

AND YET, the Left-Wing Counter-Protesters were at best infiltrated by violent Antifa/Black Lives Matter rumblers or at worst were the leaders of the rumbling Left.

 

In any case Leftist rumblers came just as armed as the racist White Supremacists. So, let’s look at Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM).

 

Antifa

 

VIDEO: Antifa Exposed – Newly Press

 

Posted by John Houk

Published on Aug 17, 2017

 

I found this exposé of Antifa on the Facebook page called “Newly Press”. (http://tinyurl.com/y754ycpp)

 

The undercover narrator is Joey Salads (sounds like it could be a pseudonym). With the one-sided reporting on the Charlottesville Rumble just looking at racist White Supremacists, it is good to remember that Communist anarchists were engaging in violence as well.

 

Racism is evil! BUT Communism is evil too!

 

From the New American:

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Police across the United States are being forced to deal with a new hard-Left, communist-derived movement organized under the code word “Antifa,” standing for “Anti-Fascist.”

 

The violent, confrontational nature of Antifa anarchists presents a challenge to U.S. law enforcement that is unprecedented; they reject the free speech principles upon which civil discourse depends, while seeking to achieve the demise of the U.S. Constitution, as it holds as illegitimate any compromise with their communist worldview.

 

The Antifa movement roots in Weimar Republic Germany

 

While the Antifa movement is anarchic in nature, it owes its birth to the Communist Party’s opposition to the Nazi fascist movement in post-World War I Germany.

 

1930s fascism is best explained by Jonah Goldberg. In his 2008 book Liberal Fascism, he points out that fascism is a phenomenon of the political Left, in that communists and fascists were “closely related, historical competitors for the same constituents.” In a key paragraph applying these principles to American fascism, Goldberg wrote:

 

Much like the Nazi movement, liberal fascism had two faces: the street radicals and the establishment radicals. In Germany, the two groups worked in tandem to weaken middle-class resistance to the Nazis’ agenda. In the previous chapter we saw how the liberal fascists of the SDS and the Black Panther movements rose up to terrorize the American middle class. In the remainder of this chapter — and the next — we will explain how the “suit-and-tie radicals” of the 1960s, people like Hillary Clinton and her friends, use this terror to expand the power and scope of the state and above all to change the public attitude toward the state as the agent of social progress and universal caring and compassion.

The Antifa movement in the U.S. is a return to the communist paramilitary riot tactics developed to fight the Brownshirts of the Weimar Republic. The goal was to terrorize middle-class Germans into rejecting the Nazis who had embraced the social-welfare programs of prior regimes.

 

 

In what was branded as a “DisruptJ20” protest, some 1,000 Antifa thugs broke windows at Starbucks, McDonald’s, and Bank of America, as well as in commercial buildings in downtown Washington. Antifa rioters flooded streets, blocked traffic, burned trash in the streets, and broke windshields of passing cars. They threatened to attack inauguration attendees on the streets, while shouting a continuous flow of angry, vulgar, and confrontational in-your-face insults.

 

 

The militant or radical Left as described by Lennard has little — if anything — in common with the traditional liberal politics of Democrats such as John F. Kennedy and Hubert H. Humphrey in the 1960s. She [i.e. Natasha Lennard] continued:

 

As organizers from anti-fascist research and news site Antifa NYC told The Nation: “Antifa combines radical left-wing and anarchist politics, revulsion at racists, sexists, homophobes, anti-Semites, and Islamophobes, with the international anti-fascist culture of taking to the streets and physically confronting the brownshirts of white supremacy, whoever they may be.” As with fascisms, not all anti-fascisms are the same, but the essential feature is that anti-fascism does not tolerate fascism; it would give it no platform for debate.

 

 

Lennard made it clear that Antifa radicals are READ ENTIRETY (How the Violent Hard-Left “Antifa” Movement Copies Communists in Weimar Republic Germany; By Jerome R. Corsi; New American; 8/15/17)

 

Ben Shapiro on Antifa:

 

… Antifa is a loosely connected band of anti-capitalist protesters generally on the far left who dub themselves “anti-fascist” after their compatriots in Europe. They’ve been around in the United States since the 1990s, protesting globalization and burning trash cans at World Trade Organization meetings. But they’ve kicked into high gear over the past two years: They engaged in vandalism in violence, forcing the cancelation of a speech by alt-right popularizer Milo Yiannopoulos at the University of California, Berkeley; a few months later, they attacked alt-right demonstrators in Berkeley; they attacked alt-right demonstrators in Sacramento, California, leading to a bloody street fight; they threw projectiles at police during President Trump’s inauguration; they attacked pro-Trump free-speech demonstrators in Seattle last weekend. They always label their opponents “fascists” in order to justify their violence.

 

In Charlottesville, Antifa engaged in street violence with the alt-right racists. As in Weimar, Germany, fascists flying the swastika engaged in hand-to-hand combat with Antifa members flying the communist red. And yet, the media declared that any negative coverage granted to Antifa would detract from the obvious evils of the alt-right. Sheryl Gay Stolberg of The New York Times tweeted in the midst of the violence, “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the park.” After receiving blowback from the left, Stolberg then corrected herself. She said: “Rethinking this. Should have said violent, not hate-filled. They were standing up to hate.”

 

Or perhaps Antifa is a hateful group itself. But that wouldn’t fit the convenient narrative Antifa promotes and the media buy: that the sole threat to the republic comes from the racist right. Perhaps that’s why the media ignored the events in Sacramento and Berkeley and Seattle — to point out the evils of Antifa might detract from the evils of the alt-right.

 

 

Here’s the moral solution, as always: Condemn violence and evil wherever it occurs. The racist philosophy of the alt-right is evil. The violence of the alt-right is evil. The communist philosophy of Antifa is evil. So is the violence of Antifa. If we are to survive as a republic, we must call out Nazis but not punch them; we must stop providing cover to anarchists and communists who seek to hide behind self-proclaimed righteousness to participate in violence. Otherwise, we won’t be an honest or a free society. READ ENTIRETY (The Group That Got Ignored in Charlottesville; By Ben Shapiro; Creators.com; 8/16/17)

 

CSC Media Group looks a bit closer at Antifa ideology:

 

 

“Anti-fascism” became the official ideology of Stalinist parties, although anarchists, and migrant activists have also continued to identify as anti-fascists. The movement would continue through the end of World War II and right on through the Cold War.

 

The Resurgence

 

It would have an almost rebirth, or resurgence in the 1990s after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Once again the communists would fight against what they saw as right-wing fascist groups. Keep in mind, although these groups were fighting fascism, it wasn’t fighting fascism for freedom. Rather they wanted to replace it with communism.

 

 

The End Game

 

Now, the communist and the anarchists don’t have the same goals, other than fighting the powers that hold them back. They’ve decided that they will fight one enemy at a time. When that one is defeated they will fight the other ones standing next to them. They will continue to fight until only one is left standing.

 

 

… One of these groups is known as “Bamn” “By any means necessary.” One of their leaders is a school teacher in California. This is possibly why so many of the protests have been concentrated along the west coast.

 

 

… There are slogans like “antifascism means attack” not only against neonazis but also against the civil and capitalist system.

 

READ ENTIRETY (“Antifa” Anti-Fascists With Pro-Communist Roots; By Dominick Luckette; CSC Media Group; 4/28/17)

 

Here are two articles worth looking at to understand the evil and un-American the Antifa Communists are to Liberty and Freedom:

 

 

 

Black Lives Matter (BLM)

From Accuracy in Media:

 

The Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, but is, in fact, the latest and most dangerous face of a web of well-funded communist/socialist organizations that have been agitating against America for decades. Its agitation has provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. If allowed to continue, that agitation could devolve into anarchy and civil war. The BLM crowd appears to be spoiling for just such an outcome.

 

 

Leftist Origins

 

Exploiting blacks to promote Marxist revolution is an old tactic. … Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn regarded Barack Obama, whose political career they sponsored, as a tool—a puppet—to use against white America. Obama’s legacy at home will certainly include more racial division.

 

[BLM Founder Photo not a part of AIM article]

 

Garza, Cullors and Tometi all work for front groups of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), one of the four largest radical Left organizations in the country. The others are the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS). Nelini Stamp’s ACORN—now rebranded under a variety of different names—works with all four organizations, and Dream Defenders is backed by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others.

 

FRSO is a hereditary descendant of the New Communist Movement, which was inspired by Mao and the many communist revolutions throughout the world in the 1960s and 1970s. FRSO split into two separate groups in 1999, FRSO/Fight Back and FRSO/OSCL (Freedom Road Socialist Organization/Organizaci?n Socialista del Camino para la Libertad). Black Lives Matter and its founders are allied with the latter group. Future references to FRSO in this article refer to FRSO/OSCL.

 

 

BLM is one of many projects undertaken by the FRSO. Except for the website, blacklivesmatter.com, there is no actual organization. The website implicitly acknowledges this, describing #BlackLivesMatter as “an online forum intended to build connections between Black people and our allies to fight anti-Black racism, to spark dialogue among Black people, and to facilitate the types of connections necessary to encourage social action and engagement.”

 

FRSO membership is disproportionately represented by blacks, gays and women, and self-consciously emphasizes those issues. Garza, who penned a “Herstory” of BLM, is a “queer,” black veteran activist involved in …

 

 

Cullors describes herself as a “working class, queer, black woman.” …

 

Cullors was trained by Eric Mann, a former Weather Underground leader who exhorts followers to become “anti-racist, anti-imperialist” activists. Mann runs another FRSO front, the Labor/Community Strategy Center. Like most professional leftists, he makes good money—over $225,000 annually—living in “the system” he advocates destroying.

 

Tometi is the daughter of illegal aliens from Nigeria. While in college, she worked for the ACLU defending illegal aliens against “vigilantes” opposed to illegal immigration. She is currently the executive director of Black Alliance for Just Immigration (BAJI).

 

 

Mainstream funders have helped fund BLM as well. For example, United Way has partnered with A&E and iHeartMedia to create Shining the Light Advisors, a committee of “nationally known experts and leaders in racial and social justice,” to oversee grant disbursements. These “advisors” include such radicals as Van Jones, Advancement Project co-director Judith Browne Dianis, and Rinku Sen, president of the Applied Research Center (ARC).

 

 

Its wide network of affiliates and partner organizations like CPUSA and ACORN allows BLM to turn out large crowds. Many participate simply to protest, commit violence, loot or all three.

 

 

Fithian echoes Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven—creators of the infamous Cloward/Piven Crisis Strategy—who spent decades attempting to provoke ghetto blacks to riot, because “Poor people can advance only when ‘the rest of society is afraid of them.’” …

 

 

Islamist organizations have also jumped on the BLM bandwagon, reminding us of the unholy alliance that exists –

between them and the radical Left. In September 2015, the Muslim Brotherhood front-group Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) joined BLM activists in storming California Governor Jerry Brown’s office. CAIR also participated in the Ferguson protests. Meanwhile ISIS is recruiting American blacks for its cause. 

 

Intellectual Genealogy of Black Lives Matter

 

We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law-breaking, withholding and concealing truth… We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, and scorn toward those who disagree with us.”—Vladimir Lenin

 

That quote from the Soviet Union’s first leader captures the entire essence of the Left’s strategy. No matter what the issue, no matter what the facts, the Left advances a relentless, hate-filled narrative that America is irredeemably evil and must be destroyed as soon as possible. The BLM movement is only the latest but perhaps most dangerous variant on this divisive theme.

 

 

Obama’s favorite Harvard professor Derrick Bell devised Critical Race Theory, which exemplifies Lenin’s strategy as applied to race. According to Discover the Networks:

 

“Critical race theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid … members of “oppressed” racial groups are entitled—in fact obligated—to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing…”

 

Bell’s theory is in turn an innovation of Critical Theory—developed by philosophers of the communist Frankfurt School. …

 

 

The “White Skin Privilege” idea was created in 1967 by Noel Ignatiev, an acolyte of Bell and professor at Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute (Du Bois was a Communist black leader who helped found the NAACP). Ignatiev was a member of CPUSA’s most radical wing, the Maoist/Stalinist Provisional Organizing Committee to Reconstitute the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (POC). POC was the intellectual forerunner to FRSO.

 

 

But do not be confused; “White” does not mean white. “White” in radical construction means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual preference who embraces capitalism, free markets, limited government and American traditional culture and values. By definition, these beliefs are irredeemably evil and anyone who aligns with them is “white” in spirit and thus equally guilty of “white crimes.” Ignatiev still teaches, now at the Massachusetts College of Art.

 

The Black Lives Matter movement carries this narrative to unprecedented heights, claiming that only whites can be racists. And while justifying violence to achieve “social justice,” the movement’s goal is to overthrow our society to replace it with a Marxist one. Many members of the black community would be shocked to learn that the intellectual godfathers of this movement are mostly white Communists, “queers” and leftist Democrats, intent on making blacks into cannon fodder for the revolution. READ INTIRETY (Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Roots of Black Lives Matter; By James Simpson; Accuracy in Media; 1/12/16)

 

When President Trump in a news conference had essentially what next lauding American history will be taken down:

 

Trump said that “this week… it’s Robert E. Lee. And, I heard Stonewall Jackson is coming down.”

 

“Is George Washington [coming down] next week. And, is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?” Trump said, noting both American icons were slaveholders in Virginia. (‘Is It George Washington Next Week?’: Trump Blasts Monument Removals as ‘Changing History’; Fox News; 8/15/17 4:58pm)

 

The New Zeal blog reports American historical monuments that had nothing to do with the Confederacy are being defaced:

 

Well, that didn’t take long. I predicted when all of this racist crap started that the lefty communists would move quickly from confederate statues onto other targets and here we go. The Lincoln Memorial was defaced yesterday with the ‘F’ word and other graffiti. Then, so-called Social Justice Warriors set their sights on the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Hundreds demanded that a “racist” statue of former President Theodore Roosevelt be taken down. I strongly suggest they don’t do that. And the communists and radicals won’t stop there… they have a huge list of targets across the nation, including anything to do with the Founding Fathers.

 

READ THE REST (Communists And Black Lives Matter Radicals Demand NY Museum Remove Statue Of ‘Racist’ Theodore Roosevelt; Submitted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton; New Zeal; 8/16/17 9:06 am EST)

 

One of the BLM founders – Alicia Garza – is paraphrased as stipulating at Mizzou U on 2/18/16:

 

“The goal of the Constitution was to make an agreement between factions known as states, which were built on the backs of black slaves.” She described constitutionalism as racist, saying: “The people vowing to protect the Constitution are vowing to protect white supremacy and genocide.” (The Real Agenda Behind Black Lives Matter; By  GERALD FLURRY; The Trumpet; 5/2016)

 

The influence of Marxists Cloward and Piven on Black Lives Matter:

 

In 1966, sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven called for the overloading of the U.S. welfare system to force the potential collapse of our Democratic Republic government and end poverty by the government “guaranteeing an annual income for all Americans.”  This is Communism–a godless human government where the state is the ultimate entity to be worshiped and obeyed.

 

Fifty years later, are we seeing Cloward and Piven’s dream become reality?  Our nation is being divided and overwhelmed economically and socially, and some feel we are on the brink of becoming a Marxist state.

 

Cloward-Piven believed in forcing political change through orchestrated crisis and not surprisingly, they were both members of the Democratic Socialists of America. The two were also involved in the birthing of radical organizations such as ACORN, which has branched out into several organizations including some in support of Black Lives Matter, according to journalist, James Simpson.

 

 

This report examines in detail, for the first time, how communist groups have manipulated the cause of Black Lives Matter, and how money from liberal foundations has made it all possible.

 

 

…The radical Left model is based on alliances of many organizations that are working on separate issues but dedicated ultimately to the same thing: overthrowing our society in order to replace it with a hardcore socialist (read communist) one.

 

The goal is to present the appearance of a formidable mass of organizations. Some are large, but many are little more than a website or Facebook page. When necessary, they can all come together to promote the cause du jour. The deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and others were mere pretexts for socialist agitation. The real enemy is “the system.” This is why the BLM crowd denies the facts of those cases. As Stamp has said, “we are actually trying to change the capitalist system we have today because it’s not working for any of us.”

 

READ ENTIRETY (BLACK LIVES MATTER, CAPITALISM, AND COMMUNISM IN AMERICA; Posted by Stand Up For The Truth; StandUpForTheTruth.com; 7/18/16)

 

Here is an interesting insight from a blogger that has been inactive since April 2017:

 

[I]t isn’t surprising that Black Lives Matter is a communist organization—but the type of communism they subscribe to is. They are conservative communists attempting to fold the progressive movement back into traditional Marxism.

 

… BLM is rebirthing the traditional class struggle, reframing it in terms of black and white.

 

The policy platform proposed by BLM in August did nothing to hide this traditionalism. Its calls for collective ownership of resources, banks, and businesses, a highly progressive income tax, a guaranteed minimum income, and government jobs are lifted straight from the pages of Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto.” Here are two excerpts for comparison:

 

“Communist Manifesto”: Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

 

 

Black vs. White Is the New Proletariat vs. Bourgeoisie

 

But more important is BLM’s use of the black versus white dichotomy. While race has a long history as a wedge issue, BLM incorporates nearly all forms of modern marginalization—“including but not limited to those who are women, queer, trans, femmes, gender nonconforming, Muslim, formerly and currently incarcerated, cash poor and working class, differently-abled, undocumented, and immigrant”—into blackness. Conversely, whiteness represents all forms of privilege (economic, social, and legal) throughout the platform.

 

BLM has simply substituted Marx’s class conflict between the proletariat and bourgeoisie for class conflict between blackness and whiteness. …

 

The black vs. white dichotomy creates a permanent enemy class, to which defection is always incomplete. And unlike the proletariat class consciousness, race consciousness already exists, making mobilization easier. …

 

Why Black Lives Matter Rejects Intersectionality

 

Where Marxism prioritizes the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (or between black and white), the modern theory of intersectionality prioritizes differences between identity politic groups. It posits that while white women face marginalization for their sex, they gain privilege from their race. Conversely, black men gain privilege from their sex while facing marginalization because of their race. Black women experience “double jeopardy,” suffering from both sex and race. This creates a hierarchy of oppression that is in constant flux as new forms of marginalization are recognized. Intersectional theory fractures the class conflict from two opposed groups into an unlimited number of conflicts within the hierarchy of oppression.

 

 

BLM treats intersectional conflicts and “non-black people of color” much the same way Marx treated the reserve army of labor and petty bourgeoisie: as auxiliaries to the proletariat and bourgeoisie conflict. In their glossary, BLM defines the term “non-black people of color” as intended “to provide greater context to the distinct and unique oppression imposed on Black people, while recognizing the struggles of other people of color.” Which is to say that while intersectional conflicts exist, the Black vs. White conflict takes priority.

 

READ ENTIRETY (How Black Lives Matter Is Bringing Back Traditional Marxism; I Have A Dream; 9/29/16)

 

Currently Antifa Communists and BLM Communists seem to have linked their agendas together fomenting violent revolution through race baiting. I have to wonder if the Obama Administration clandestinely empowered these anarchist revolutionaries. Many Conservatives have used this moniker for Barack Hussein Obama: Race-Baiter-in-Chief.

 

I also have to wonder if Obama’s Organizing for Action Deep State group (See Also HERE) has some clandestine linkage to BLM or even Antifa for that matter.

 

It is clear the American Left pulling out all the unConstitutional stops to destroy the Liberty and Freedom our Founding Fathers enabled during and after the Revolutionary War to form the greatest Republic the world has seen. If the Left has its way – Antifa and BLM are Marxist tools – the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution will be ripped up and placed on the forgotten ash heap of history.

 

JRH 8/17/17

Please Support NCCR

Charlottesville Is Biggest ‘Fake News’ of Summer


Again, just to be clear. The Neo-Nazi-KKK-White National racist march to defend Confederate was an evil that must be reprehensible to all Americans. I mean these guys actually were more concerned about a public display of their racist ideology then legitimately protesting the historical cleansing of American history.

 

David Horowitz points out the racists legally applied for and obtained permit to march publicly. The Antifa/Black Lives Matter Communists did not have a permit. AND the Charlottesville Police made zero effort to enforce the law when the Antifa/BLM Marxist/Black Supremacist supporters counter-protested illegally without a permit.

JRH 8/17/17

Please Support NCCR

****************

Charlottesville Is Biggest ‘Fake News’ of Summer

 

By David Horowitz

Sent 8/16/2017 2:39 PM

Sent from Newsmax

Link found at Newsmax: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/charlottesville-virginia-fake-news/2017/08/16/id/808009/

 

[Newsmax] Editor’s Note: David Horowitz is the author of the runaway New York Times bestseller “Big Agenda: President Trump’s Plan to Save America.” His book first predicted the anti-Trump left would use race to divide America and undermine the Trump presidency. His op-ed for Newsmax appears below. Get more info on “Big Agenda” — Go Here Now.

 

The tragedy in Charlottesville could have been an occasion to stop and consider how the tolerance for politically correct violence and politically correct hatred is leading the nation towards civil war.

 

Instead the media and the political left have turned this incident into the biggest fake news story of the summer, transforming its real lessons into a morality play that justifies war against the political right, and against white people generally.

 

The organizers of the “Unite the Right” demonstration in Charlottesville were repellent racists.

 

But they came to defend a historic monument honoring a complex man and cause, and not to attack it or presumably anyone else.

 

They applied for a permit and were denied. They re-applied successfully in a petition supported by the local ACLU.

 

If they had come to precipitate violence, why would they have gone to the tedious trouble of applying for a permit?

 

Who knows what — if anything — would have happened if that had been the end of the story and no one had showed up to oppose them.

 

What Unite the Right actually demonstrated was that the assortment of neo-Nazis, pro-Confederates and assorted yahoos gathered under the banner of the “Alt-Right” is actually a negligible group.

 

This supposed national show of strength actually attracted all of 500 people.

 

Compare that to the tens of the thousands who can readily be marshaled by two violent groups of the left — Black Lives Matter and Antifa — and you get an idea of how marginal “white supremacists” are to America’s political and cultural life.

 

Yet “white supremacy” and its evils became the centerpiece of all the fake news reporting on the event, including all the ludicrous attacks on the president for not condemning enough a bogeyman the whole nation condemns, and that no one but a risible fringe supports.

 

Talk about virtue signaling!

 

Omitted from the media coverage were the other forces at work in precipitating the battle of Emancipation Park, specifically Black Lives Matter and Antifa, two violent leftwing groups with racial agendas who came to squelch the demonstration in defense of the monument.

 

Unlike the Unite the Right demonstrators, the leftist groups did not apply for permits, which would have been denied since there was another demonstration scheduled for that park on that day.

 

But why should they have applied for a permit, since the mayhem they had previously caused in Ferguson, Berkeley, Sacramento, Portland and other cities, was accomplished without permits, while their criminality was presented by the media as “protests,” and their rioting went completely unpunished.

 

In other words, there were two demonstrations in Charlottesville — a legal protest by Unite the Right and an illegal protest by the vigilantes of Antifa and Black Lives Matter.

 

Who started the fight is really immaterial. Both sides were prepared for violence because these conflicts are already a pattern of our deteriorating civic life.

 

Once the two sides had gathered in the same place, the violence was totally predictable.

 

Two parties, two culpabilities; but except for the initial statement of President Trump, condemning both sides, only one party has been held accountable, and that happens to be the one that was in the park legally.

 

What is taking place in the media accounts and political commentaries on this event is an effort by the left to turn the mayhem in Charlottesville into a template for their war against a mythical enemy — “white supremacy” — which is really a war on white people generally.

 

The ideology that drives the left and divides our country is “identity politics” — the idea that the world consists of two groups — “people of color” who are guiltless and oppressed, and white people who are guilty and oppressors.

 

This is the real race war.

 

Its noxious themes inform the mindless, hysterical hatred of President Trump, and the equally mindless support of racist mobs like Black Lives Matter and Antifa.

 

It is a war from which no good can come. But it won’t be stopped unless enough people have the courage to stand up and name it for what it is.

 

David Horowitz’s book “Big Agenda” has been the #1 bestselling book of the Trump presidency — find out how to get your FREE copy today and save $27! Go Here Now

 

David Horowitz is the president of the David Horowitz Freedom Center and a leading conservative thinker.

_________________

This email was sent by:


Newsmax.com
1501 Northpoint Parkway, Suite 104
West Palm Beach, FL 33407 USA

Charlottesville Violent Participants Pt ONE


John R. Houk

© August 16, 2017

 

The clash between extreme Left and extreme Right in Charlottesville VA has been a primary staple of the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) lately. The difficulty with the reporting is that it is all one-sided.

 

It is an awesome thing to expose the racism involved with the extreme Right protesters using Confederate history as an excuse to go medieval. HOWEVER, it is a huge MSM failure to not report that the extreme Left came to that protest ready to engage in head-knocking as well. This what President Trump has been communicating that there was wrong on both sides. But the MSM used the President’s two wrongs don’t make a right commentary as a fake news accusation that he supported the racists in the Charlottesville melee.

 

I personally am a bit perturbed with the MSM associating ALL Conservative supporters of the Trump agenda to Make America Great Again with the racist extremists who came to bash extreme Leftist heads.

 

In this Part ONE I am going to look at the Charlottesville racists as a bit of an expose of what Conservatives must denounce. Then Part Two I will look at the background of the extreme Left who came to bash the heads of the extreme Right. I’ll be using a grouping of racists I found at The Gospel Coalition.

 

A witness on the Counter-Protest side of Charlottesville clash – Kristin Adolfson – recounts her perspective:

 

“But I was getting the heck out of there. I always look for escape routes. Most people were moving away from the various white-supremacist groups marching downtown—the neo-Nazis, the Southern Brotherhood, or whatever, with their shields.

 

“I thought there were gonna be a lot more alt-right people there. As far as what I saw, it was, like, five counter-protesters for every neo-Nazi.

 

“One of the alt-right factions marched right by and we just stood there and watched them intently, making eye contact. At that point, they ran into another group of counter-protesting locals, who were African-American. The alt-right people were chanting, ‘Heil Trump!’ That got really intense, so we tried to get some cops, but they didn’t come at that point.

 

“I was about ten feet away when the car came. I had joined a group marching from the Downtown Mall—a group of anti-fascists and Black Lives Matter folks—and we were silently marching by Friendship Court, a low-income-housing area where many minorities live. We’d heard that the fascists had already gone there and tried to cause problems. So we marched by, in silence. We didn’t want to make a scene. We just wanted to be in solidarity with the people there. Then we saw a bunch of other counter-protesters coming down Second Street. Another diverse group. We all were cheering together, marching together, clapping and chanting. There was no one else around. No standoff. We were just marching, being peaceful. This was around two o’clock, I guess. It was a very exuberant feeling of solidarity, community, all that.

 

 

“I was ten feet away, so I didn’t really see details of the car. It was just sudden movement through the crowd, sound, bodies in the air. One of my friends was an inch away from the car. I went and found her and she was looking for her partner. She was freaking out. I stood with her until she found him. She’s in one of those photos circulating around now.

 

READ ENTIRETY (A Witness to Terrorism in Charlottesville; By Charles Bethea; The New Yorker; 8/13/17)

 

Bethea’s interview with Kristin Adolfson was a bit one-sided because there is zero mention of the counter-protesters coming armed ready to confront the racist White Supremacist groups who also came armed. The Bethea interview does point out the counter-protesters outnumbered the racist White Supremacist 5 to 1:

 

“I thought there were gonna be a lot more alt-right people there. As far as what I saw, it was, like, five counter-protesters for every neo-Nazi.

 

I wonder what the reader would have come away thinking if they knew Antifa (“anti-fascists”) and Black Lives Matter (BLT) were represented among the counter-protesters and many came geared in battle garb?

 

Most Americans understand the racist nature of White Supremacist groups such as the KKK, Neo-Nazis, White Nationalists and such that may come to mind. However, just in case time has distanced some younger folks to just what these American racists stood for, let’s take a brief look.

 

The Gospel Coalition names these White Supremacists at Charlottesville VA:

 

Some of the groups included were the Proud Boys (a far-right men’s organization), the Alt Knights (a “tactical defensive arm of the Proud Boys”), the American Guard (a white nationalist group), Real 3% Risen (a neo-Confederate group), League of the South (a neo-Confederate group), the Lightfoot Militia (a private militia group), the Traditionalist Worker Party (a white nationalist group), the Nationalist Front (a white nationalist group), Vanguard America (a white nationalist group), and four different groups of the KKK. (The FAQs: Violence and Death at a White Nationalist Rally in Charlottesville; By Joe Carter; The Gospel Coalition; 8/14/17)

 

I am going to look at the group listed by TGC which in full disclosure probably is not a complete list. For example, the Leftist news site Vox also included a group called [Real] 3% Risen. 3%-ers aren’t usually racists and are typically more upset with the Federal government deviating from Originalist Constitutionalism. I’m having a difficult time referencing the Real 3% Risen group thus I am sticking with the TGC list. If I was to hazard a guess though, if the Real 3% Risen group were not White Supremacists, they would have been the only non-White Supremacists in Charlottesville VA.

 

I begin with the KKK.

 

Ku Klux Klan (KKK)

 

The KKK was formed in post-Civil War day primarily in the Southern States rebelling against Union. Here’s a History.com excerpt:

 

Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s. After a period of decline, white Protestant nativist groups revived the Klan in the early 20th century, burning crosses and staging rallies, parades and marches denouncing immigrants, Catholics, Jews, blacks and organized labor. THERE IS MORE including video (KU KLUX KLAN; History.com Staff; History.com; published 2009)

 

Did you notice the Dems and not the GOP initiated the KKK?

 

Wikipedia sources the Leftist SPLC and Pro-Jewish Rights ADL on KKK “Current Developments”:

 

The modern KKK is not one organization; rather it is composed of small independent chapters across the United States.[198] According to a 1999 ADL report, the KKK’s estimated size then was “No more than a few thousand, organized into slightly more than 100 units.”[199] In 2017, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors extremist groups, estimated that there were “at least 29 separate, rival Klan groups currently active in the United States, and they compete with one another for members, dues, news media attention and the title of being the true heir to the Ku Klux Klan.”[200] … Analysts believe that about two-thirds of KKK members are concentrated in the Southern United States, with another third situated primarily in the lower Midwest.[199][201][202]

 

 

According to a 2016 analysis by the SPLC, hate groups in general are on the rise in the United States.[205] The ADL published a report in 2016 that concluded: “Despite a persistent ability to attract media attention, organized Ku Klux Klan groups are actually continuing a long-term trend of decline. They remain a collection of mostly small, disjointed groups that continually change in name and leadership.”[206]

 

 

Many KKK groups have formed strong alliances with other white supremacist groups, such as neo-Nazis. Some KKK groups have become increasingly “nazified”, adopting the look and emblems of white power skinheads.[210] (Ku Klux Klan; Wikipedia; last edited on 8/14/17 03:30)

 

In doctrine, the KKK are as racist as ever with a vain attempt to distance themselves from violent brutality which is still conducted. From the Counter Extremism Project:

 

The KKK’s overriding doctrine is white supremacy, white solidarity, and preservation of the white race. The group describes itself as “promoters of White Christian civilization.”

 

 

Notwithstanding these attempts to disassociate the KKK from its racist foundations, the “same bigoted rhetoric…lurks beneath the veneer,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The KKK “target[s] blacks more often than any other group.” Biracial couples are also “frequent targets of Klan violence,” while anti-Semitism and “rabidly homophobic” literature since the 1970s also form key pillars of the KKK’s ideology. … (Ku Klux Klan; © 2017 Counter Extremism Project)

 

According TGC, The Charlottesville rally organization the protest permit on behalf of the Proud Boys.

 

Proud Boys

 

Proud Boys is a far-right men’s organization[1][2][3][4] founded in 2016 by Vice Media co-founder and former commentator Gavin McInnes. McInnes describes the organization as a “pro-Western fraternal organization” for men who “refuse to apologize for creating the modern world.”[5]The group has been referred to as alt-right,[6] but McInnes describes the alt-right as “too far” because they think “Whites are what [are] important, not necessarily Western values”, and instead identifies as “alt-lite“. He claims to be inclusive to anyone “as long as you accept the western world as the best.”[7]

 

The group takes its name from the showtune “Proud of Your Boy,” a song introduced in the 2011 stage-show version of Disney’s Aladdin.[6][8]

 

In 2017, Kyle Chapman, with the “full-approval” of McInnes, formed a “street fighting” wing of the Proud Boys called the “Fraternal Order of the Alt-Knights” (FOAK).[9][10] (Proud Boys; Wikipedia; page was last edited on 8/15/17 16:55)

 

From ItsGoingDown.org:

 

Established last year, the Proud Boys was meant to be something between an adult frat and a fan club for Gavin McInnes’ media projects on Compound and Rebel Media. The political aspect of the group was meant to mirror Gavin’s; support of the Trump agenda, male chauvinism, and hatred of Islam, trans people, and leftists. McInnes himself flirts with fascist ideas, writing a column for Taki’s Magazine (a job Richard Spencer helped him land) justifying the political genocide of the Pinochet regime, and often giving a supportive platform to open fascists and neo-Nazis like Emily YoucisNathan Damigo, and Sam Hyde on his show.

 

Despite his affiliations, McInnes has been adamant about keeping Proud Boys an arm’s length from America’s growing neo-Nazi movement, something he recently reiterated in a video for Rebel Media. He claims, first of all, that Nazis don’t exist—most people claiming to be Nazis are just trolling and any reported hate crimes are hoaxes perpetrated by liberals, and secondly, the few Nazis who do exist should not be Proud Boys because he wants the group to appeal to “Jews” and “Blacks.”

 

… Proud Boys were prominent in their black and gold polo shirts, and black, latino, and Jewish Trump supporters fought alongside various species of white identitarians … Sal Cipolla of Oceanside New York, a regional leader of the Proud Boys who is part Colombian. McInnes says he hopes to have a conservative movement to which people of color can defect, and does not worry about inviting them to join in a popular front that starts with his own brand “civil nationalism,” and ends with the white nationalists and raging anti-Semites in their coalition.

 

But Gavin must know how wrong he is that there are no Nazis. Several prominent Proud Boys run in their circles, even Cipolla, who is oddly accepted under the grounds that they will “send him back last.” Together, the allegedly “Alt-Lite” Proud Boys and self-proclaimed neo-Nazis from the Daily Stormer blog and The Right Stuff podcast network have formed an Alt-Right popular front with an agenda of injecting White Nationalism, including it’s most radical calls for ethnic cleansing, genocide, and “White Sharia” into “normy” Trumpism, and intimidating and attacking leftists, queers, and people of color. While they will defend themselves on the grounds of free speech, their incitement to violence has a recent history of success.

 

Since their inception, the Proud Boys have been rooted in THERE IS MORE (Neo-Nazis Brag of Open Connections with Gavin’s ‘Proud Boys’; By One People’s Project; ItsGoingDown.org Overtly Leftist; 5/18/17)

 

Salvatore Cipolla and Gavin McInnes

 

No matter what hear Gavin McInnis says, these Proud Boys dudes are wick racists more than Patriotic Nationalists looking for legitimization from President Trump’s coattails.

 

Next on the list is Alt Knights.

 

Alt Knights

 

From the Proud Boys official website:

 

Shock waves were sent through the Proud Boy universe yesterday as Kyle Chapman, better known as the internet meme “Based Stick Man” announced on facebook he planned to start a Fraternal Order of Alt Knights (or “FOAK”) as a tactical defensive arm of the Proud Boys.  The need for defense has grown since recent premeditated attacks by the radical Marxist group “Anti-Fa” have become the norm at any cultural event politically to the right of Jane Fonda.  Anti-Fa were responsible for the riots in DC, the assault on Gavin McInnes at NYU, and the violent blockade at multiple free speech events including Berkeley in California. (The Kids Are Alt-Knights; By PawL BaZiLe; Proud Boy Magazine; 4/2017)

 

Alt Knights founder Kyle Chapman has a history of getting caught breaking the law and has served considerable time in the slammer:

 

Rap sheet: Suspicion of felony assault with a deadly weapon, carrying a concealed dirk or dagger, assault with a taser, assault with pepper spray March 4; 1993 felony robbery conviction in Texas; 2001 grand theft conviction for ripping off Macy’s in San Diego; 2009 conviction for felon in possession of a firearm. (The kids are alt-right: Your guide to the new crop of white nationalists; By C-VILLE Writers; C-Ville.com; 8/10/17 9:00 AM)

 

Chapman’s jailbird days must have turned him into thug deceiving himself he is beating people for the nation:

 

Shortly after the March 4 Berkeley incident, Chapman was arrested again. He was taken into police custody in early April after he allegedly got into an altercation with a skateboarder who hit him, and another man threatened him with a knife.

 

Chapman said in a video that he was marching through Berkeley wearing a large American flag so as to advertise for a free-speech rally planned in the city later in the week.

 

“Just wanted to show you guys there is nothing to fear by coming out here and exercising our First Amendment rights,” he said in the video. “Most of the inhabitants of this city are a bunch of f*****g cowards that couldn’t fight their way out of a paper bag.”

 

 

Chapman has started his own branch of American Nationalism, called the Fraternal Order of Alt-Knights.

 

He claimed that he started the group to “protect and defend our right wing brethren.” Chapman said he hoped to accomplish those goals through “street activism, preparation, defense, and confrontation.”

 

“(The group) is for those that possess the Warrior Spirit. The weak or timid need not apply,” Chapman wrote. “President Trump has our back for the next 8 years. The timing couldn’t be better. Let’s do this!” (Kyle Chapman aka ‘Based Stickman’: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know; By Chris Bucher; Heavy.com; 6/4/17 8:00am – Updated 5:32pm)

 

I’m all for America First nationalism, but when some of these fellows like Chapman and McInnis use violence to promote a racist American nationalism makes them no them no better than the Leftist Marxists who use race-baiting to incite racists to violence.

 

Next on the list is the American Guard.

 

American Guard

 

… They had American flags, but also carried strange shields. Many wore t-shirts that read “American Guard” or “Vinlanders.”  A few had somewhat sinister appearances, such as the marcher who wore “Vinlanders” sunglasses and sported a “RAHOWA” (“Racial Holy War”) tattoo on the side of his head.

 

 

… The group would, it claimed, “encourage Americans of any race, class or faith to participate with us in these beliefs.”

 

Even a cursory examination of the American Guard, however, suggests that its deliberately innocuous self-description may not be accurate. The group’s logo, for example, prominently displays two crossed meat-cleavers, while members frequently use images of actor Daniel Day Lewis in his role as “Bill the Butcher” in the movie The Gangs of New York. “Bill the Butcher” was a fictionalized version of William Pool, the leader of the Bowery Boys, a violent street gang in New York City infamous for its attacks on immigrants.

 

 

Indeed, before the American Guard was the American Guard, it was actually the Indiana chapter of a group called the Soldiers of Odin USA, a branch of an extreme anti-immigrant and anti-refugee group that originated in Finland in 2015 and has spread to many other countries. … As a recent ADL report has shown, many Soldiers of Odin USA members are white supremacists or anti-government extremists.

 

The man who started the Indiana Soldiers of Odin, and who later converted it into the American Guard, is Brien James, a long-time Indiana white supremacist who was one of the founders of the Vinlanders Social Club (VSC), a hardcore racist skinhead gang that has had a high association with violence. READ ENTIRETY (Behind The American Guard: Hardcore White Supremacists; Anti-Defamation League; 3/30/17)

 

Next on the list is the League of the South.

 

League of the South

 

Here are some excerpts from the League of the South website.

 

What is The League of the South?
by Dr Michael Hill – LS President

 

… The League of the South is a Southern Nationalist organization whose ultimate goal is a free and independent Southern republic.

 

To reach this goal, we intend to create the climate for a free South among our people …

 

 

At present, the League is more concerned with resurrecting our cultural base than with entering into the political arena. Once our Southern culture is re-established, then the political issues will begin to take care of themselves. …

 

League of the South Core Beliefs Statement

 

At its founding meeting in June 1994, The League of the South adopted the following Statement of Purpose:

 

“We seek to advance the cultural, social, economic, and political well-being and independence of the Southern people by all honourable means.”

 

  1. Cultural Independence

 

The League of the South believes that Southern culture is distinct from, and in opposition to, the corrupt mainstream American culture. Therefore, we stand for our own sublime cultural inheritance and seek to separate ourselves from the cultural rot that is American culture. …

 

 

  1. Social Independence

 

The League of the South asserts that Southern society is radically different from the society impressed upon it by an alien occupier. American society today is egalitarian and Marxist and is devoid of any grace or charm. In contrast, we believe in a Southern society that …

 

… Another certainty is that the American Empire that now occupies the South believes in none of the aforementioned ideals and principles. To be truly free and self- governing, the South must throw off the yoke of imperial oppression. Therefore, The League of the South advocates the secession and subsequent independence of the Southern States from this forced union and the formation of a Southern republic. …

 

 

  • Restricts the right to vote solely to those who are recognized as citizens of one of the member States of the confederation.

 

League of the South Statement on “Racism” 
LS Board of Directors

 

The term “racism” has its origins in Communism and that movement’s sordid attempt to undermine Western Christendom. Because it has been effective in silencing many of their opponents, the modern day left continues to employ it. Hence, we in The League of the South will not respond to what we consider as an anti-white and anti-Southern appellation designed to demonize us and inculcate “white guilt” in our people. If you call us “racists,” our response will be “so what?” (Introduction to The League Of The South; League of the South)

 

These LS guys are definitely not Pro-American. They Separatists trying to recreate the culture that existed during and before the Confederacy. Part of that culture was slavery. Without saying so the LS promotes White Supremacy and segregation. Even after blood and gore, there is no way Americans even the South would allow such regression! No matter how you look at it, this movement is NOT about Making America Great Again!

 

Next is the Lightfoot Militia.

 

Lightfoot Militia

 

The website TGC links to the LM PDF entitled “Militia Standards and Principles of the Light Foot” (81 pages):

 

Why “Light Foot”?

 

We in the “Patriot Movement” like tradition.

 

Up until the late 18th / early 19th century, British infantry units were called “Foot” (foot soldiers).

 

As in, the “13th Regiment of Foot”. Light infantry was called “Light Foot”.

 

Cavalry was called “Horse”, heavy cavalry was “Heavy Horse”, for example, the “48th Regiment of Horse”.

 

As we will not have much in the way of supply lines or support elements, we will most likely “live off the land, resupply off the enemy”, so to speak. Carrying what we need on our backs through the

mountains and hills. Light = Fast.

 

Hence, the “Light Foot” militia or “Light Foot”, for short (Idaho Light Foot, Utah Light Foot, etc).

 

 

Statement of Ethics/Mission Statement

Statement of Ethics –

 

It is the duty of the citizen’s militia to protect and defend the unalienable Rights of all members of the community. Under no circumstances will the militia tolerate those who advocate acts of criminal violence, terrorism or a change away from our republican form of government; nor will it support any specific political party or candidate, nor espouse any particular religious denomination or doctrine. All members must understand the duties and obligation of both citizens and government under the United States and their state’s constitution.

 

Mission Statement

 

The members of the unorganized militia shall ever stand, as have our forefathers before us, first to God, from Whom we acknowledge the Authority of all Rights, and all the blessings of governments and to our native state.

 

We therefore pledge:

 

– To promote and defend the unalienable God-given rights of all citizens, regardless of race, sex or national origin, as is expressed in our state constitutions and the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution.

 

– To promote and defend the principles of just government bequeathed to us by our forefathers to whit, that the principle of the Tenth Amendment shall stand inviolate, as history has shown that the greatest system of checks and balances exists with the people and their states to check the powers accrued by the federal government.

 

– That the integrity of the courts, be they local, State or federal, shall remain uncontemptable providing that they shall respect and uphold the rights of the citizens of the several states, including but not limited to, upholding the due process of law, and to preserve the right of trial by jury, and to obtain immediate judicial review of cases wherein abuse of basic Constitutional rights are questioned.

 

– That all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their Life, Liberty, and Property; for the advancement of those ends they have at all times an unalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper. READ ENTIRETY (Bold Text is Editor’s – Militia Standards and Principles of the Light Foot; By Jeffrey Stankiewicz; TheLightfootMilitia.com; 3rd Edition, 4/19/14 (rev 1))

 

I did not find any hint of racism in this PDF. However, the document is steeped in 10th Amendment State sovereignty yet includes loyalty to the U.S. Constitution and to the State Constitution (in this case Idaho) with obeying the rule of law. UNLESS the government embarks on a path of lawless unconstitutional practices in which case We The People are obligated to “… have at all times an unalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.”

 

So, who decides among the Lightfoot Militia that the government has become unconstitutionally corrupt? The measuring stick shows such corruption has been on the increase for decades. But again, who decides that the government has gone too far to be redeemable? The answer is not in the PDF.

 

Next is the Traditionalist Worker Party.

 

Traditionalist Worker Party

 

From the front page to https://www.tradworker.org/:

 

The Traditionalist Worker Party is America’s first political party created by and for working families. Our mission is defending Faith, Family, and Folk against the politicians and oligarchs who are running America into the ground. We intend to achieve that goal by building a nationwide network of grassroots local leaders who will lead Americans toward a peaceful and prosperous future free from economic exploitation, federal tyranny, and anti-Christian degeneracy.

 

Notice the Neo-Nazi White Supremacist slogan of “Faith, Family, and Folk”. This is one of the things that bugs me about these racists. They say faith and combine it with Christianity as if the Christian faith is all about racial purity that excludes non-Whites and Jews cannot be Christians. I have news for these racists. The Good News of Jesus Christ is inclusive of all Gentiles (multi-racial non-Jews) and Jews alike. Read all of Chapter 2 of the Epistle to the Ephesians – For clarity here is the Amplified Bible, Classic Edition. For brevity or the point here is an excerpt from Chapter 2:

 

13 But now in Christ Jesus, you who once were [so] far away, through (by, in) the blood of Christ have been brought near.

 

14 For He is [Himself] our peace (our bond of unity and harmony). He has made us both [Jew and Gentile] one [body], and has broken down (destroyed, abolished) the hostile dividing wall between us,

 

15 By abolishing in His [own crucified] flesh the enmity [caused by] the Law with its decrees and ordinances [which He annulled]; that He from the two might create in Himself one new man [one new quality of humanity out of the two], so making peace.

 

16 And [He designed] to reconcile to God both [Jew and Gentile, united] in a single body by means of His cross, thereby killing the mutual enmity and bringing the feud to an end. (Eph. 2: 13-16 AMPC)

 

Under the “Folk” heading of the Traditionalist Worker Party the White Supremacist Nazi racism becomes clear:

 

The ethnic community is the definition of a true nation. Shared blood, history, and traditions are what make a people and bind us together as an extended family. We in the Traditionalist Worker Party fight for the interests of White Americans, a people who for decades have been abandoned by the System and actively attacked by globalists and traitorous politicians.

 

Only by securing a Homeland for our national community, run for and by our people with true self-determination, can we truly have a future for our blood and our culture. We are unapologetically nationalists, fighting to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. Every one of our policies and platform planks is built upon achieving the goal of a better, happier, healthier and brighter future for our children.

 

Next is the Nationalist Front.

 

Nationalist Front

 

From the Nationalist Front webpage:

 

The Nationalist Front is an umbrella organization to bring unity and solidarity to the White Nationalist movement in North America. This is an alliance between many diverse organizations which seek to better the cultural, economic, and demographic conditions of White Americans.

 

 

A response to nearly every single problem we have in our nation–from street crime to anti-White governmental policies, to attacks on our sovereignty and faith–can be answered in one simple phrase “If White people had a country of our own, this wouldn’t be happening.”

 

 

… we now must sever ties with this illegitimate regime and build for our posterity a nation for us and by us, build from the ground up to put the best interests of our Faith, Family and Folk first. …

 

The only logical solution to the racial strife in America is to follow the example of the dissolution of the USSR and to Balkanize the nation ethnically and culturally.

 

 

There is no longer a defining set of principles, language, religion, culture, or ethnicity of America that bonds the various peoples together with one another, only the same oppression of the federal regime. We as White Nationalists must unite with fellow ethnonationalists to stand on the same barricades against the same enemy, the globalists and the Jewish banking elites.

 

Some Black Americans have already begun to build for themselves a homeland with groups like the Nation of Islam buying thousands of acres of farmland to feed their people, establishing alternative media for their people, celebrating their culture, and gaining political and economic power in regions where Blacks are the majority.

 

Hispanics have already demographically and culturally displaced the former White majority in much of the American Southwest and should be allowed to formalize their control of the communities and regions they already dominate. We must cede what’s no longer ours while doubling down on the communities and regions which remain majority White to begin building our own sovereign and independent Homeland while respecting the right of self determination for majority non-White regions.

 

… Ick, You get the idea – 21st century Nazism 101 (UNITY STATEMENT; The Nationalist Front)

 

Next on the list is Vanguard America. The link by TGC is https://bloodandsoil.org/manifesto/. Either the VG removed the site or WordPress removed it (as of 8/15/17) probably over heat about Charlottesville violence. Here is some Wikipedia info on a similar name National Vanguard:

 

National Vanguard is an American white nationalist organization based in Charlottesville, Virginia, founded in 2005 by Kevin Alfred Strom and former members of the National Alliance.[1] (National Vanguard (American organization); Wikipedia; page was last edited on 8/15/17 23:11)

 

A link provided by Wikipedia sends one to the National Vanguard homepage which one can find the About Page:

 

SCIENCE CONTINUES to prove that race exists. The Human Genome Project has unlocked human DNA, and medical advances are being made based on targeting genetic sequences individual to each race. Thousands upon thousands of years of separate racial development have led to a great diversity of human races, which have in turn formed separate cultures with vastly different values and achievements.

 

 

The European race is uniquely beautiful and creative. It is imperative that we survive and progress.

 

If Vanguard America is similar then racism is prevalent.

 

The Left-Wing Trump hating Washington Post says this about Vanguard America:

 

The secretive organization has been emerging publicly since the presidential election, starting with white nationalist fliers on several college campuses and recruiting on a website that vilifies Jews, racial minorities, gays and multiculturalism. Group members have been rallying alongside neo-Nazis, white nationalists and white supremacists, and its members have been seen in images on social media — faces often blurred — as groups of young white men waving black flags and wearing black hats emblazoned with a Vanguard America white eagle logo.

 

 

… it is unclear how many members Vanguard America has or what broader influence it has achieved. The group’s website rails against the loss of white control of the United States and proclaims white America’s “right to exist.”

 

 

Dillon Irizarry, 29, a Marine Corps veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and identifies himself as the group’s president, said in a Skype interview Monday that his is a political group that does not calling for or condone violence. … (Vanguard America, a white supremacist group, denies Charlottesville ramming suspect was a member; By Justin Wm. Moyer and Lindsey Bever; Washington Post; 8/15/17 6:51 PM)

 

Mr. Irizarry, if Vanguard America is non-violent, why does WaPo have a picture of you guys in battle gear including logo mark shields in Charlottesville VA?

 

James Alex Fields Jr., second from left, at a white supremacist rally. He allegedly later drove a car into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing one person and injuring many more. Vanguard America, a white supremacist group with whom Fields congregated, denies that he was a member. (Alan Goffinski/AP)

 

Here is interesting info on Dillon Irizarry:

 

Dillon Ulysses Hopper, the self-described “CEO” of the Vanguard America neo-Nazi hate group whose members appeared alongside Fields in a widely-circulated photograph taken at the rally, reportedly joined the Marine Corps in 2005. A veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Hopper’s military records show the 29-year-old New Mexico native (whose birth name is Dillon Irizarry) served as an enlisted Marine, an information security technician (MOS 0681).

 

 

These days, Hopper reportedly goes by the name “Commander Dillon” — and his “army” was on full display at the #UniteTheRight rally in Charlottesville on Aug. 12, when the group marched alongside other extremist organizations in protest of the city’s decision to remove a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee. …

 

Hopper managed to rise to the rank of staff sergeant and remained on active duty until January 2017, according to his military records. He claimed in an interview with Splinter that he became the leader of Vanguard America one year ago. Marine Corps policy prohibits members from participating in organizations “that espouse supremacist causes,” and violators face possible separation or non-judicial punishment. Evidently that wasn’t enough to deter Hopper.

 

 

Vanguard America reportedly formed in California in 2015 and, according to its website, is guided by the belief that that America has been “brought to its knees by decadence,” and “White Americans will be a minority in the nation they built” if “current trends continue.”  To join the group, a person must be “of at least 80% White/European heritage,” and not a criminal or addict of any kind, explains the group’s website. “Homosexuals, transexuals, adulterers, or any form of sexual degeneracy,” also need not apply. (Leader Of Charlottesville White Nationalist Group Was A Marine Corps Recruiter; By ADAM LINEHAN; Task & Purpose; 8/14/17)

 

Dillon Irizarry as a Marine recruiter and later as a part of Vanguard America {Photos from Task & Purpose)

 

JRH 8/16/17

Please Support NCCR

Lock Her UP Redux


John R. Houk

© August 10, 2017

 

This tidbit of AWESOME information hasn’t the MSM yet. Apparently, according to a Newsmax story, Crooked Hillary is about to experience Attorney General Jeff Sessions reopening an investigation into her illegal email server while Secretary State.

 

The limited info available claims the DOJ has offered Crooked Hillary a plea agreement. If accurate, the agreement would let Crooked Hillary of the hook for further investigation, including pay-to-play investigations, if she admits she committed a prosecutable offense over the emails.

 

If true, and she goes along with it the plea agreement, the Clinton Crime family gets a pass on accountability. So far people in the know seem to believe Crooked Hillary may have too much hubris to admit a criminal offense.

 

Frankly, I hope a hubris issue is true. The Clinton Crime family has operated too long without criminal accountability. I hope the investigation is true. If there was a plea offer, I hope Clinton arrogance refuses it. AND I hope a thorough investigation proceeds that leads to the entire crooked swamp, up to and including Barack Hussein Obama!

 

VIDEO: BREAKING NEWS: Hillary Clinton to be Offered a Plea Deal by AG Jeff Sessions DOJ

 

Posted by Golden State Times

Published on Aug 9, 2017

 

The Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she will agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law, according to a Clinton attorney

Subscribe for more: http://bit.ly/2ul0Cqo

►SIGN UP to our Newsletter Here: Goldenstatetimes.com

►If you would like to help us out on PayPal:
paypal.me/GSTLIVE

Thank you In Advance

SOCIAL MEDIA:

► Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/GoldenStateTimes

►Follow us on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/GST_Politics

 

JRH 8/10/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Report: Hillary Clinton email investigation reopened — Clinton purportedly offered plea deal

 

By Sarah Taylor

Aug 9, 2017 7:43 pm

The Blaze

 

The investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email servers has reportedly been reopened, and the former presidential candidate has allegedly been offered a plea deal. (Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images)

 

A Tuesday report published on conservative website, Newsmax, has many people questioning the validity of claims made against Hillary Clinton and reports that the email server investigation has been reopened.

 

The article, titled, “Hillary’s Plea Bargain,” was penned by Ed Klein, former New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief, and claimed that not only had the Clinton email investigation been reopened, but that Clinton was offered a plea bargain if she will admit that she “committed a prosecutable crime.”

 

Klein claimed that the report came from one of Clinton’s attorneys.

 

From Newsmax:

 

The Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she will agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law, according to a Clinton attorney.

 

The discussion of a plea bargain took place late last month and was offered by a high-ranking Justice Department official to the Clinton lawyer.

 

During the exploratory talks with the prosecutor, the Clinton attorney was told that despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts.

 

Under the Justice Department’s plea offer, Hillary would be required to sign a document admitting that she committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email probe.

 

Also as part of the agreement, the Justice Department would not proceed with an investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton exorbitant speaking fees.

 

The Clinton attorney cautioned that normally a plea is offered by a prosecutor only upon arraignment, and Hillary has not yet been charged with any crime.

 

Klein on Tuesday also noted that he didn’t think Clinton would take the plea bargain.

 

Speaking with “America Talks Live’s” Miranda Khan, Klein said, “Sometimes she has trouble admitting that she’s Hillary Clinton, you’re absolutely right. This is a woman who never, ever admits that she did anything wrong.”

 

“We’ve all seen how she has blamed everybody but herself for her loss in 2016 at the presidential election. So you’re right, I totally agree with you that the chances of her accepting such an offer are practically zero,” he said.

 

Despite doubling down on his remarks about the Clinton investigation, there seemed to be a discrepancy in communication, because after the article was published, he told Khan that the Department of Justice was “considering” reopening it, not that they had reopened it.

 

“They are seriously thinking of reopening this investigation and therefore if she doesn’t take the plea agreement, which I agree with you, she almost certainly won’t, I think they will then proceed with this investigation and this is going to drag on for a long time and in a way balance the investigation that’s going on with President Donald Trump and his campaign advisers regarding so-called collusion with the Russians.”

_____________

Lock Her UP Redux

John R. Houk

© August 10, 2017

____________

Report: Hillary Clinton email investigation reopened — Clinton purportedly offered plea deal

 

© 2017 TheBlaze, Inc.

 

Drain Swamp – Prosecute Lynch


John R. Houk

© August 9, 2017

 

If you haven’t already heard, Loretta Lynch has been caught using an alias in communicating about her meeting with former President Slick-Willie Clinton on an airport tarmac right smack in the middle of the 2016 Presidential campaign and the investigation – er I mean the “matter” – of Crooked Hillary’s easily hacked private email server.

 

Slick-Willie/Loretta Lynch

 

Once Lynch has been outed in suspicious emails with a clandestine email handle connected to the tarmac meeting, the Conservatives (including me) pointed the “I knew it finger”. Unsurprisingly the Leftist pundits claim, “nothing to see here”. As if because many Obama Administration used email aliases explains everything. BULL MANURE! The email aliases point to hiding a nefarious Obama communication system to hide unseemly activities.

 

In introducing a Fox News story on these Lynch shady activities, D. Jolly writes:

 

If someone didn’t do anything wrong, then is there any reason to use an alias when referring to what you did? That’s the question that Congress needs to be asking former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

 

On June 27, 2016, in the heat of the presidential campaigns and during the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, Lynch met with and talked with Bill Clinton on the tarmac as Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. This was quite unusual and drew many questions, but Lynch and Clinton swore that it was just a friendly meeting with no discussion about the campaign of email scandal. RIGHT! (WHY DID LYNCH USE ALIAS IN REFERRING TO CLINTON TARMAC MEETING? By D JOLLY; Great American Politics; 8/8/17)

 

This means Lynch committed perjury at her Congress testimony:

 

VIDEO: Loretta Lynch Guilty of Perjury?

 

Posted by Mike Cernovich

Published on Aug 6, 2017

 

It looks like Loretta Lynch lied but will it matter?

Check me out of Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MikeCernovich/

 

As the video shows, Lynch lied about using government email for only official business. Lynch lied! Will she be prosecuted? I’m thinking this is a great drain the swamp opportunity to give her immunity in exchange for at least the true conversation between her and Slick Willie. If Lynch continues with the crapola that the conversation was about family matter, prosecute her for lying. No one happens to be at an airport tarmac to speak with an ex-President merely on family matters!

 

Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit provides a great outline of Lynch’s Deep State corruption.

 

JRH 8/9/17

Please Support NCCR

******************

Boom! Loretta Lynch Used Alias Email for Alibi the Day After She Was Caught Meeting with Bill Clinton on Tarmac

 

By Jim Hoft

August 7th, 2017 5:23 pm

Gateway Pundit

 

On Friday internet sleuth Kim Dotcom dropped a bomb on Twitter.

 

Kim posted an email Friday showing Loretta Lynch using an alias to contact DOJ officials.

 

The Department of Justice released hundreds of emails to the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) this week in the investigation of former AG Lynch’s secret meeting with former President Bill Clinton.

 

One email shows Loretta Lynch hiding her identity from Department of Justice officials. 

 

Elisabeth Carlisle Email

 

Melanie Newman from the Department of Justice leaked it in the email.

And— AG Lynch (Elizabeth Carlisle) then responded with a “thanks to all who worked on this.”

 

Here is Kim DotCom’s tweet:

 

MORE— Another message from June 29 to the Attorney General was sent to the Elizabeth Carlisle account.

 

Melanie Newman to Elizabeth Carlisle

 

Now this

Reddit The Donald users discovered that Loretta Lynch used her grandmother’s maiden name “Lizzie Carlisle” as her alias.

 

Loretta’s grandmother’s name is Lizzie Carlisle Harris.

Loretta’s mother’s name is Lorine Harris Lynch.

 

Here is her grandmother’s death certificate.

 

 

It looks like the deep state forgot to cover that up in the emails they released to the ACLJ.

 

Now this.

 

AG Loretta Lynch told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) under oath that she only uses official email in November 2016 — after these above emails were sent.

 

Lynch-Carlisle photo

 

Rep. Trey Gowdy: So you use official email to conduct official business?

 

AG Loretta Lynch: Yes sir. I do.

 

That was a complete lie under oath.

Loretta Lynch committed perjury.

 

Via Reddit The Donald.

 

VIDEO: Trey Gowdy Smashes Lying Loretta Lynch For Protecting Hillary Clinton

 

Posted by Amicus Humani Generis

Published on Nov 28, 2016

 

trey gowdy puts AG in her place.

follow on twitter! https://twitter.com/AmicusGenerisYT

Channel Merchandise Has READ THE REST

 

Now this

Lynch’s attorney confirmed on Monday that Lynch emailed under that pseudonym.

The Daily Caller reported:

 

“Lynch’s attorney, Robert Raben, confirmed to TheDC on Monday that Lynch emailed under that pseudonym. He pointed to an article published in The Hill last February in which the Justice Department acknowledged that Lynch was using an email handle that was not her given name.

 

“That address was and is known to the individuals who process [Freedom of Information Act] requests; the practice, similar to using initials or numbers in an email, helps guard against security risks and prevent inundation of mailboxes,” Raben said.

 

And Lynch used the alias email the day after she was caught meeting with Bill Clinton on on a private plane in Arizona.

 

Lynch said she and Clinton talked only of grandchildren, golf, and their respective travels but the documents that were released to Judicial Watch are highly redacted confirming none of that was true.

 

Lynch used her Carlisle address on June 28th — the day after her infamous meeting with Bill Clinton.

 

Carlisle to Newman email

 

Loretta Lynch lied about not using an alias email while under oath, she lied about the nature of her conversation with Bill Clinton on the Arizona tarmac and now she was caught using her alias email the day after her infamous tarmac meeting to decide on how she would lie to the lapdog media.

___________________

Drain Swamp – Prosecute Lynch

John R. Houk

© August 9, 2017

_________________

Boom! Loretta Lynch Used Alias Email for Alibi the Day After She Was Caught Meeting with Bill Clinton on Tarmac

 

2017 theGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.

 

About The Gateway Pundit

 

In late 2004 I started The Gateway Pundit blog after the presidential election. At that time I had my twin brother Joe and my buddy Chris as regular readers. A lot has changed since then.

 

Today The Gateway Pundit is one of the top political websites. The Gateway Pundit has 15 million visits each month (Stat Counter – Google Analytics). It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, The Drudge Report, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations.

 

Jim Hoft was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013. Jim Hoft received the READ THE REST

 

King Calls For Wider Investigations of Obama, Clinton…


Rep. Steve King (R-IA) just became one of my new political heroes. He berated Congress in session (7/27/17) over ignoring ALL the Dem Party corruption while being hot to sick Robert Mueller on witch hunt to take down the Trump Administration.

 

Check it out:

 

VIDEO: BREAKING: [VIDEO] CONGRESS DEMANDS THE INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON

 

Posted by Trumpet News

Published on Aug 1, 2017

 

The Gateway Pundit summarizes King’s message this way:

 

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) addressed Congress last Thursday in support of legislation that requires the Attorney General to turn over documents regarding former FBI Director James Comey’s involvement in various controversial cases.

 

The legislation passed 16-13 with King voting in favor of it. King addressed Congress with an impassioned and detailed inquiry/speech. … (Rep. Steve King Calls for Full Investigations Into Obama, Clinton, Comey, Soros, Lynch, and Others (VIDEO); By Carter; Gateway Pundit; 8/1/17 4:36 pm)

 

Below are the talking points in the AWESOME video you just watched from Rep. Steve King’s website.

 

JRH 8/4/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

King Calls For Wider Investigations of Obama, Clinton, Comey, Soros, Lynch, Abedin, and Weiner Scandals

 

Jul 27, 2017

Press Release

SteveKing.House.gov

 

Congressman Steve King released the following video of statements he made during Judiciary Committee debate of legislation requiring the Attorney General to provide copies of any document, record, audio recording, memo, correspondence, or other communication that refers or relates to a number of troubling aspects of James Comey’s tenure as FBI director.

 

In the course of his remarks, Congressman King recounted a litany of facts and events that reveal the corruption that surrounds many of the nation’s most prominent Democrats, as well as their disturbing pattern of using American taxpayer money to interfere in foreign elections. King’s entire remarks can be viewed here.

 

King concluded his remarks by asserting the trail of Democratic election corruption leads to Barack Obama, and that the examples he cites should be investigated fully.

 

Excerpted remarks:

 

On Barack Obama’s election interference in other countries:

 

“It’s pretty clear the Obama administration sent their people over to Israel to work against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Pretty much openly. Significant dollars invested in that campaign over there. The President of the United States, with at least the moral support of the people that had worked for him, in the country of Israel, [sought] to shift the results of the election against the seated Prime Minister, Bibi Netanyahu.”

 

 

“The Obama administration is a long ways from clean on this, as far as being involved in elections in other countries.”

 

On George Soros’ Use of Taxpayer Money to interfere in election in the Balkans:

 

learned the United States government, borrowing money from China and Saudi Arabia, had handed over at least $5,000,000 in contracts transferred through USAID into George Soros’s organizations that were used to manipulate elections in the Balkans.”

 

On the need to reopen investigations into Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner:

 

The long string that we should be looking at with this investigation and special counsel that is our request here goes a long ways back. It goes clear back to Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, 650,000 emails, which we still have access to.”

 

On James Comey’s sham investigation of Hillary Clinton:

 

This [Comey’s Investigation of Clinton] is what looks like, on its face, a sham investigation. Plus, they destroyed a tremendous amount of information: at least 30,000 emails, crushed hard drives, bought bleach bit, hired outside contractors to scrub emails up. And we’re to take James Comey’s word for this, that there wasn’t enough substance there to bring a prosecution, even though a year ago, July 5th, James Comey delivered 15 minutes of a summary of prosecution that was completely convincing to me until we got down to the last couple sentences of that presentation which was, ‘well, we can’t prove intent.’ Well, curiously there is no requirement for intent in the two statutes that appear to be violated.”

 

I look back in the records to the previous October and previous April, Barack Obama stated into the news media record ‘Hillary Clinton would never intend to put our national security at risk; Hillary Clinton would never intend to harm America’s security. That’s the previous October and April. Well, James Comey latched onto that word, ‘intend’, and they made up new law and gave Hillary Clinton an exemption for this intent that they said they couldn’t prove which is absolutely proven by the facts [Comey] delivered to us in the summary that day.”

 

On Loretta Lynch:

 

“Not only does this trail lead through Hillary Clinton and James Comey, but the Loretta Lynch component of this as well. When you put this in place, and look at the example of them on the tarmac, it’s hard to imagine they sat there for 45 minutes and discussed grandchildren.”

 

On allegations Democratic Operatives went to the Ukraine to get dirt on Candidate Trump:

 

“That brings me to Alexandra Chalupa who went off as a DNC contractor to Ukraine to try to gather dirt on the Trump people. So, bringing this around, Mr. Chairman, I’ll conclude with this: the trail leads also to Barack Obama and we need to investigate all of this.”

 

________________

Steve King Bio on House Page

 

Steve King grew up in a law enforcement family in Storm Lake, Iowa. He attended Denison Community High School, where he met Marilyn Kelly, whom he married in 1972. They have lived in Kiron since 1976 and are members of St. Martin’s Church in Odebolt. Steve and Marilyn have three grown sons and seven grandchildren.

King studied math and science at Northwest Missouri State University. He started King Construction in 1975 and built the business up from one bulldozer. He brings valuable knowledge to Congress as an agribusinessman and a small business owner for 28 years. King’s oldest son now owns the construction business.

He served in the Iowa State Senate for six years. He was a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Judiciary Committee, Business and Labor Committee, the Commerce Committees, and chair of the State Government Committee. He worked in the State Senate to successfully eliminate the inheritance tax, enforce workplace drug testing, enforce parenting rights, including parental notification of abortions, pass tax cuts for working Iowans, and pass the law that made English the official language in Iowa.

King was elected to Congress in 2002 to represent Iowa’s Fifth Congressional District. During the 2012 election cycle, Iowa was redistricted to four districts. King now represents the Fourth Congressional District in the 114th Congress which includes: Ames, Fort Dodge, Mason City, Sioux City and Spencer. He brings personal experience, Constitutional principles, traditional marriage and family values and the perspective of representing one of the top producing agriculture districts in the nation to the people of Iowa’s Fourth Congressional District.

King serves on the Agriculture Committee. He has long been dedicated to adding value as close to the corn stalk and bean stem as possible, as …

 

 

King is also a member of the House Judiciary Committee, where he sits on the Constitution and Civil Justice Subcommittee and the Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee. He believes the Constitution means what it says and that it should be read with the intent of our Founding Fathers in mind. King is never caught without a copy of the Constitution in his coat pocket. He is a strong advocate of the Rule of Law and enforcing our borders. King is a full-spectrum, Constitutional Conservative.

 

King, for more than a decade, has chaired the Conservative Opportunity Society, a powerful and legendary House caucus that has become the conscience of Constitutional conservatives in the U.S. Congress. (READ ENTIRETY)


 

 

The Mueller Deep State Collusion


John R. Houk

© August 4, 2017

Now that Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller (James Comey good friend) has impaneled a Grand Jury giving him the power of the government with search warrants and subpoenas, it is time to look at the tainted witch hunt team Mueller has assembled.

 

Michael Dreeben

 

Dreeben is a Dem donor meaning he is a Trump hater:

 

A fourth lawyer on Mueller’s staff, Michael Dreeben, donated $1,000 to Clinton 2006 and $250 to Obama in both 2007 and 2008. (Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors; By Brendan Kirby; Lifezette.com; Update 6/13/17 10:30 AM)

 

And here:

 

Dreeben donated $1,000 dollars to Hillary Clinton’s Senate political action committee (PAC), Friends of Hillary, while she ran for public office in New York. Dreeben did so while he served as the deputy solicitor general at the Justice Department. (SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TEAM IS FULL OF HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTERS; By BRIAN ANDERSON; DownTrend.com; 6/12/17)

 

Andrew Weissmann

 

Weissmann donated a combined $2,300 to Obama’s campaign in 2008. In 2006, Weissmann contributed at least $2,000 to the DNC. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$ to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)

 

And here:

 

… Andrew Weissmann, who gave six donations to PACs for Obama in 2008, totaling $4,700 … (Ties to Comey Suggest Conflict of Interest for Special Counsel Mueller; By Joshua Philipp; Epoch Times; 6/15/17 12:19 PM – Updated 12:38 pm)

 

And here:

 

Andrew Weissmann defended the federal government’s surveillance rights in a panel discussion at the George Soros-funded New America Foundation, is also an Obama donor. (CONFIRMED: Mueller Team Can Be Disbarred For Clinton Conflicts In Trump Case; By Patrick Howley; Big League Politics; 7/23/17 5:07 am EST)

 

Jeannie Rhee

 

… Rhee represented Hillary Clinton in a 2015 lawsuit that sought access to her private emails. She also represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering lawsuit.

 

… She maxed out her donations both in 2015 and 2016 to Clinton’s presidential campaign, giving a total of $5,400. (Meet the all-star team of lawyers Robert Mueller has assembled for the Trump-Russia investigation; By Michelle Mark and Madeleine Sheehan Perkins; Business Insider; 8/1/17 8:31 PM)

 

And here:

 

One of the hires, Jeannie Rhee, also worked as a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation and helped persuade a federal judge to block a conservative activist’s attempts to force Bill and Hillary Clinton to answer questions under oath about operations of the family-run charity.

 

Campaign-finance reports show that Rhee gave Clinton the maximum contributions of $2,700 in 2015 and again last year to support her presidential campaign. She also donated $2,300 to Obama in 2008 and $2,500 in 2011. While still at the Justice Department, she gave $250 to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp. (Mueller staffs up to pursue obstruction of justice; By Thomas Lifson; American Thinker; 6/13/17)

 

James Quarles

 

According to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Quarles had made significant donations to Democratic candidates, including former President Barack Obama and Clinton. Most recently, in October 2016, Quarles donated $2,700 to Clinton’s presidential campaign. Quarles also donated over $7,000 to Obama over the last decade. Quarles did, however, donate $2,500 to former Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, in 2015. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$ to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)

 

And this:

 

Starting in 1987, Quarles donated to Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis’s presidential PAC, Dukakis for President. Since then, he has also contributed in 1999 to Sen. Al Gore’s run for the presidency, then-Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) presidential bid in 2005, Obama’s presidential PAC in 2008 and 2012, and Clinton’s presidential pac Hillary for America in 2016. (CORRECTED: Three members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democrats; By OLIVIA BEAVERS; The Hill; 6/12/17 02:23 PM EDT)

 

Aaron Zebley

 

Aaron Zebley, who repped Clinton aide and key email-scandal figure Justin Cooper … (CORRECTED: Three members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democrats; By OLIVIA BEAVERS; The Hill; 6/12/17 02:23 PM EDT)

 

More specifically:

 

Aaron Zebley represented Justin Cooper, a Hillary aide and one of two people with access to Clinton’s clandestine and illegal email server. Cooper helped set it up. (Corruption: 3 Reasons to Reset the ‘Russia’ Investigation; By Craig Huey; Election Forum; 6/21/17)

 

Greg Andres

 

A search of federal election records shows that Andres has donated at least a total of $3700 to federal Democratic candidates, including $2700 to New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in March 2017.

 

 

Andres, 50, also has another connection to the Democratic Party as his wife, Ronnie Abrams, is a federal judge that was nominated by President Barack Obama in 2011. (Mueller Hires Yet Another Democratic Donor; By Alex Pfeiffer; Daily Caller; 8/1/17 7:36 PM)

 

Andrew Goldstein

 

Goldstein contributed a combined $3,300 to Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$ to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)

 

And this:

 

During his [i.e. Goldstein] time in the Manhattan attorney’s office, Goldstein served under Bharara, who up until March served as the chief federal prosecutor in Manhattan. Bharara was controversially fired by the Trump administration, along with 46 other Obama-era U.S. attorneys, earlier this year. (Robert Mueller just hired an Obama-era US prosecutor for Trump-Russia investigation; By Chris Enloe; The Blaze; 7/3/17 9:52 am)

 

Elizabeth Prelogar

 

Prelogar is an appellate attorney on detail from the Office of the Solicitor General. Prelogar donated $250 to Clinton in 2016 and $250 to Obama in 2012. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$ to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)

 

And this:

 

Elizabeth Prelogar, an appellate attorney on detail from the Office of the Solicitor General.

–Fluent in Russian; former law clerk to Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. (Trump Team Digs Up Dirt on Mueller’s 15 Activist Attorneys; By Staff; The Daily Trump; 7/22/17)

 

In an attempt at fair and balanced, there are others on the Mueller legal team that have donated to the Dems but only to the tune of hundreds rather than thousands of dollars. I can’t believe any Dem will do a fair investigation into a Trump/Russia collusion crime any more than I can believe a Conservative (yet not necessarily a RINO GOP) would do a fair investigation of either Russian collusion with Trump or the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Conservatives would look for Trump exoneration or Crooked Clinton conviction evidence. I know my view is skewed, but it is my opinion to connect the Crooked Clintons/Obama and their minions to crimes more than there will ever be credible evidence against the Trump organization.

 

The hugest problem of a conflict of interest is in Special Prosecutor Mueller himself due to a close friendship to Comey. This is the kind of friendship that convinces me Mueller will do all in his power to make sure former FBI buddy Comey is not snared in any legal violations EVEN if Mueller has to fabricate evidence against President Trump.

 

Check out these thoughts from Abe Hamilton:

 

“I think the president has sound grounds to disqualify Mueller for a host of reasons,” says Hamilton,” the least of which is his personal relationship with James Comey.”

 

There is no doubt, adds Hamilton, that at the center of the ongoing investigation is Comey himself.

 

“Brothers in arms: The long friendship between Mueller and Comey,” reads the headline of a May story at the liberal Washington Post.

 

Meanwhile, fact-checking website Snopes insists the claim they are “best friends” is “mostly false” despite quotes from a former assistant FBI director who said they are close and suggested a conflict of interest is obvious.

 

The law codifying the special counsel would require Mueller to recuse himself, Hamilton advises, because his friendship with Comey “would likely induce partiality.”

 

“At a minimum,” Hamilton tells OneNewsNow, “the president has the legal grounds to remove him based on that alone.”

 

Beyond that relationship, he further points out, is a conflict of interest with Rod Rosenstein, who hired Mueller. (Attorney: Oh, yeah, Mueller definitely has a conflict; By Chad Groening; One News Now; 8/2/17)

 

Mueller was involved in Crooked Hillary’s (then Secretary of State) Russia/American-Uranium collusion:

 

A top national attorney in consultation with U.S. attorneys confirmed to Big League Politics that special counsel Robert Mueller and members of his team can be formally disbarred for waging the “Russia” case against President Donald Trump. Mueller and his associates have glaring conflicts of interest in the case concerning Trump.

 

Mueller’s team is tainted not only by partisan political donations and activities, but by direct relationships with former clients like Hillary Clinton, who is integrally involved in most of the possible evidence in this case. These conflicts clearly violate American Bar Association guidelines.

 

Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians in selling them our uranium. Clinton handpicked Mueller to give a sample of uranium to the Russians, and Mueller subsequently flew to Moscow, according to publicly available documents. (CONFIRMED: Mueller Team Can Be Disbarred For Clinton Conflicts In Trump Case; By Patrick Howley; Big League Politics; 7/23/17 5:07 am EST)

 

Those on the Mueller witch hunt legal team that have Dem Party agenda connections and/or connection to the Crooked Clintons have a huge conflict of interest according Big League Politics:

 

The American Bar Association’s Criminal Justice Standards for the Prosecution Function make clear that Mueller’s team is in violation of standards, according to the top national attorney. Here are the relevant sections (emphasis added):

 

“A prosecutor should not use other improper considerations, such as partisan or political or personal considerations, in exercising prosecutorial discretion. A prosecutor should strive to eliminate implicit biases, and act to mitigate any improper bias or prejudice when credibly informed that it exists within the scope of the prosecutor’s authority.

 

(b)  A prosecutor’s office should be proactive in efforts to detect, investigate, and eliminate improper biases, with particular attention to historically persistent biases like race, in all of its work.  A prosecutor’s office should regularly assess the potential for biased or unfairly disparate impacts of its policies on communities within the prosecutor’s jurisdiction, and eliminate those impacts that cannot be properly justified.”

 

 “Standard 3-1.7           Conflicts of Interest

 

(a)  The prosecutor should know and abide by the ethical rules regarding conflicts of interest that apply in the jurisdiction, and be sensitive to facts that may raise conflict issues.  When a conflict requiring recusal exists and is non-waivable, or informed consent has not been obtained, the prosecutor should recuse from further participation in the matter. The office should not go forward until a non-conflicted prosecutor, or an adequate waiver, is in place…”

 

“(c)  The prosecutor should not participate in a matter in which the prosecutor previously participated, personally and substantially, as a non-prosecutor, unless the appropriate government office, and when necessary a former client, gives informed consent confirmed in writing.

 

(d)  The prosecutor should not be involved in the prosecution of a former client. A prosecutor who has formerly represented a client should not use information obtained from that representation to the disadvantage of the former client.”

 

“(f)  The prosecutor should not permit the prosecutor’s professional judgment or obligations to be affected by the prosecutor’s personal, political, financial, professional, business, property, or other interests or relationships.  A prosecutor should not allow interests in personal advancement or aggrandizement to affect judgments regarding what is in the best interests of justice in any case.”

 

“g)  The prosecutor should disclose to appropriate supervisory personnel any facts or interests that could reasonably be viewed as raising a potential conflict of interest.  If it is determined that the prosecutor should nevertheless continue to act in the matter, the prosecutor and supervisors should consider whether any disclosure to a court or defense counsel should be made, and make such disclosure if appropriate.”

 

“(j)  The prosecutor should promptly report to a supervisor all but the most obviously frivolous misconduct allegations made, publicly or privately, against the prosecutor.  If a supervisor or judge initially determines that an allegation is serious enough to warrant official investigation, reasonable measures, including possible recusal, should be instituted to ensure that the prosecution function is fairly and effectively carried out.  A mere allegation of misconduct is not a sufficient basis for prosecutorial recusal, and should not deter a prosecutor from attending to the prosecutor’s duties.” (Ibid.)

 

AND how can American voters ignore the conflict of interest between Mueller and Comey:

 

Former FBI Director Jim Comey “closely coordinated” with Special Counsel Robert Mueller before his planned testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his interactions with President Trump.

 

Fox News reported a source close to Comey said the former FBI director consulted with Mueller about how to approach Thursday’s Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (Comey ‘closely coordinated’ with Mueller on Trump testimony: Report; By Josh Siegel; Washington Examiner; 6/7/17 5:05 PM)

 

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) on Comey/Mueller collusion:

 

Rep. Louie Gohmert on Tuesday said the only collusion that should be investigated is between the “dirty” James Comey and Robert Mueller, who “conspired to violate the law” in order to “blackmail” the president.

 

 

“This thing stinks to high heaven,” Gohmert said. “Comey is dirty, Mueller is dirty.”

 

 

“Comey testified he ran things by Mueller before he testified, also ran things by other people in the Justice Department when he did the memo. There is so much collusion in the Justice Department.”

 

Further, there was obviously no obstruction of justice or Comey would have acted long before he was fired. Instead, Gohmert believes Comey’s testimony last week before the Senate Intelligence Committee further proves collusion.

 

“If (Comey) and the others at the Justice Department with whom he colluded had felt like there had been an obstruction of justice, then they conspired to violate the law by together holding that back so they could blackmail (Trump) later,” Gohmert said. (Rep. Gohmert: ‘Dirty’ Comey, Mueller Colluded to ‘Blackmail’ Trump; By Mark Swanson; Newsmax; 6/13/17 01:13 PM)

 

I realize the Dems will go ballistic if Mueller is fired. BUT you can expect the Trump base who elected him President will go medieval if some kind of loose change is tossed at Trump that is absolutely irrelevant to a Trump campaign colluding with Russia.

 

The lesser of two evils: Fire Mueller!

 

Then shut the Dems up by prosecuting real crimes like Crooked Hillary, her minions, Deep State Obama anti-government treason and Obama’s minions.

 

JRH 8/4/17

Please Support NCCR

+++

WND has a great poll pertaining to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller.

 

Here is the poll question and choices:

 

Do you have faith in objectivity of Special Counsel Mueller?

 

 Yes, of course. Trump just prefers someone whom he can manipulate

 

 Yes, he is the consummate professional

 

 Yes, he has a stable of great Democratic lawyers working for him

 

 I’m not sure yet

 

 No, he has a stable of hack Democratic lawyers working for him

 

 No, he’s the ultimate Washington insider. He can’t be trusted

 

 No, this is a witch hunt, and Trump needs to fire him posthaste

 

 Other

 

Go HERE to place your WND vote and get instant results