Peter ‘Scoffer’ Strzok Kept People Awake with The Creeps Last Night


On Thursday (7/12/18) I watched about 98% of two House Committees questioning Peter Strzok. That is nearly 10 hours of Republicans trying to get answers and of Dems doing every parliamentary procedure possible to obstruct those answers. ALSO, I was greatly disappointed of the FBI excuse to prohibit Strzok answers in the name of an ongoing investigation.

 

I mean really, if some of those questions were answered by Strzok, it would not have affected an ongoing investigation. For example off the top of head: No investigative procedure would be exposed if the specifics of who or how many people were involved in pushing the Steele Dossier as a valid source for a FISA Warrant?

 

The Dems were so infuriating that my family may have thought I was watching a football game loudly castigating numerous bad calls!

 

JRH 7/14/18

Please Support NCCR

********************

Peter ‘Scoffer’ Strzok Kept People Awake with The Creeps Last Night

 

Strzok Creeps [Photo edited by Editor]

 

By Judi McLeod

July 13, 2018

Canada Free Press

 

What the devil were former FBI agent Peter Strzok and the Democrats trying for during Strzok’s appearance before the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees yesterday?

 

This is one public Democrat Act that went well beyond the main takeaway: that Strzok’s infamous message to mistress, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page: “We will stop him” (Trump) was based not on his “bias” but on his “deep patriotism”.  The takeaway went well beyond because the manner in which he gave it lived on to give people who watched it online night time creeps and lurid nightmares.

 

Some Canada Free Press readers were sending in alerts—even as the Hearing was in progress.

 

Others were contemplating in overnight wee hours just what is it was that they saw on video.

 

“Scoffer” is the name of the arrogant, haughty man who acts with arrogant pride”-Proverbs 21:24.

 

Scoffer is a name that fits Strzok to a ’T’. Scoffer Strzok invaded citizen dreams last night.

“A video clip of Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok at Thursday’s marathon House hearing by the Judiciary and Oversight committees shows Strzok smirking and squirming in a manner that has given the creeps to people who have watched it online. Strzok was being questioned by Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) late in the day-long hearing.” (Gateway Pundit, July 12, 2018)

 

“The clip was posted by a Twitter user, @Hollybowie, in three versions, an eight-second clip, a seven second loop and a three second loop.

 

 

 

 

 

“In response to a query as to when in the hearing this took place, Bowie said around 6:30 p.m. (EDT).

 

 

“Imagine having to look at that creepy behavior by a senior government official all day at the hearing.

“UPDATE: A TGP reader posted in the comments (thank you!) the YouTube video of Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) questioning Strzok. The squirming smirking is at the end. The link is set to start the video just before then.

 

VIDEO: Rep. Mark Walker Questions FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok on Text Message and Bias

 

[Posted by Representative Mark Walker

Published on Jul 12, 2018

 

July 12, 2018 | walker.house.gov]

 

“A version posted from CNN’s feed:

 

 

And in slow motion close-up.

 

 

“Pleasant dreams, everyone!”

 

“Strzok was on Mueller’s special counsel team until the text messages were discovered.  He was then reassigned to the FBI’s office of human resources.” (Fox News, July 12, 2018)

 

Hard to believe while watching him yesterday that just last month he was escorted from the bureau and was relieved of his security clearance.

 

The devil must have been doing gleeful cartwheels during yesterday’s Hearing:

 

“Like many people, I had and expressed personal political opinions during an extraordinary presidential election. Many contained expressions of concern for the security of our country,” Strzok said in his opening statement, adding that those opinions were expressed “out of deep patriotism.” (Fox News, July 12, 2018)

 

“We’ll stop it”—referring directly to Trump’s candidacy expressed “out of deep patriotism”?

 

What kind of patriotism is THAT?

 

“In the exchange Strzok, also said he doesn’t even remember sending the “stop” Trump text, noting it was written late at night, “in shorthand”. (Fox News)

 

With the Deep State running the show, a lot of strange things go on “late at night”.

 

Meanwhile, no matter how well meaning some of its members, congress should toss ‘Peter Scoffer’ out of the limelight, bring down the Final Curtain on him—thereby getting him out of our nightmares.

 

We should take solace of the soul in just knowing that:  “The haughty looks of a man shall be brought low, and the lofty pride of men shall be humbled and the Lord alone will be exalted in that day”: (Isaiah 2:11), and that “Everyone who is arrogant in heart is an abomination to the Lord; be assured, he will not go unpunished.” (Proverbs 16:5)

 

It is high time to write the words “The End” on ‘Peter Scoffer’s litany of alibis.

____________________

Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.

 

Older articles by Judi McLeod

 

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the ‘fair use’ exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com 

 

DeSantis Hearing Establishes the Muslim Brotherhood Must Be…


The Muslim Brotherhood should have been declared terrorist organization decades ago. Thanks to a hearing at the Subcommittee on National Security of the House oversight committee chaired by Ron DeSantis, the terrorist designation seems closer than ever.

 

JRH 7/12/18

Please Support NCCR

**********************

DeSantis Hearing Establishes the Muslim Brotherhood Must Be Designated as a Terrorist Organization – the Sooner, the Better

 

Press Release Contact: Deborah Hamilton

Sent 7/11/2018 6:25 PM

Sent From: Center for Security Policy

 

WASHINGTON, D.C.— It is no longer a question of whether the United States will designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization. It is only a matter of when and how.

 

That’s the principal take-away from a congressional national security panel this morning that addressed “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Global Threat” and what the US should do about it.

 

“This hearing is an opportunity to discuss what the United States’ next step should be in combatting the Muslim Brotherhood’s threat,” said Congressman Ron DeSantis (R-FL), chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security of the House oversight committee.

 

“The Muslim Brotherhood is a militant Islamist organization with affiliates in over 70 countries,” DeSantis said. “There’s no question that the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliates are involved in terrorism.”

 

The historic hearing follows a June 28 Center for Security Policy Decision Brief that called on the Trump Administration to declare the entire Muslim Brotherhood and its fronts and affiliates as terrorist organizations.

 

“Thankfully the Trump Administration has discarded the Obama-era policy of treating the Brotherhood as a potential ally,” DeSantis said. “Now, the questions are focused on how expansive to make the terror designation, and whether it should be done through the State Department or Treasury Department.” 

 

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a longtime associate of the Center for Security Policy, was one of the four witnesses who testified. He was the only Muslim witness, and made the case powerfully for Center-recommended policy of designating the entire Muslim Brotherhood and its fronts as terrorist entities.

 

In the course of his testimony, Dr. Jasser rebutted characterizations by the Brotherhood’s apologists and enablers of its critics as “haters” and “Islamophobes”:

 

Nothing would be more pro-Muslim than the marginalization of the Muslim Brotherhood and its direct affiliates. Making the Muslim Brotherhood radioactive would allow the light to shine upon their most potent antagonists in Muslim communities – those who reject political Islam and believe in liberty and the separation of mosque and state.

 

He also discussed national security risks associated with failing to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates as terrorist entities. One of them is censorship of jihadist terminology in U.S. government agencies.  Dr. Jasser correctly observed that such censorship impedes analysts’ ability to protect the nation:

 

To think that these words and concepts, and others are off limits in the freest nation on earth, censored [in] our agencies, is just incredulous considering the growing threat we face today from violent Islamism.  It smacks of a bizarre invocation of blasphemy laws in America. It is groups like the Muslim Brotherhood that have benefited from our refusal to discuss these elements of Islam and Islamism.

 

The three other witnesses – Hillel Fradkin of the Hudson Institute, Jonathan Schanzer of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and Daniel Benjamin of the Qatar-funded Brookings Institution – agreed to varying degrees that the Muslim Brotherhood constitutes a threat.  They recommended, however, more narrow terrorist designations of specific Muslim Brotherhood entities.

 

Chairman DeSantis observed: “It is clear that the Brotherhood constitutes a real threat to the national security interests of the United States.  We can debate the best way to counter this threat, but simply ignoring the threat is not an acceptable answer.”

 

The Center for Security Policy has submitted a statement for the hearing record endorsing Rep. DeSantis’ assessment and laying out the factual basis for designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

 

Center President Frank J. Gaffney urged legislators, executive branch officials, the media and the public at large to examine particularly compelling evidence of the threat the Brotherhood poses: Its 1991 Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal of the Group in North America– a secret plan for “destroying Western civilization from within” written by a top Muslim Brotherhood operative, Mohammed Akram, and introduced by the federal government into evidence in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation et.al. v. United States terrorism financing trial.

++++++++++++++++++++

Designate the Entire Terrorist Muslim Brotherhood Now

 

By Frank Gaffney – Secure Freedom Minute

July 12, 2018

Center for Security Policy

 

This is Frank Gaffney with the Secure Freedom Minute.

 

Congratulations to Rep. Ron DeSantis and others who took on the Muslim Brotherhood yesterday in a hearing on Capitol Hill.  They established that it’s a foreign terrorist organization and will be officially designated as such by the U.S. government.  The only question is how soon and how comprehensively.

 

Muslim reformer Zuhdi Jasser testified that in 2011 then-FBI Director Robert Mueller told Congress that “elements of the Muslim Brotherhood both here and overseas have supported terrorism.” Dr. Jasser added, “Nothing would be more pro-Muslim than the marginalization of the Muslim Brotherhood and its direct affiliates.”

 

That’s because the Brotherhood seeks to impose its seditious Sharia-supremacist doctrine on pro-American Muslims as it works – according to the group’s secret plan – to use stealthy “civilization jihad” to “destroy Western civilization from within.”

 

They must be stopped.  Start by designating the entire Muslim Brotherhood now.

 

This is Frank Gaffney.

+++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEO: The Muslim Brotherhood’s Global Threat [Feed actually Begins at the 9:30 mark]

 

Posted by oversightandreform

Streamed live on Jul 11, 2018

 

Learn more at https://oversight.house.gov/

________________________

DeSantis Hearing Establishes the Muslim Brotherhood Must Be Designated as a Terrorist Organization – the Sooner, the Better

 

AND

 

Designate the Entire Terrorist Muslim Brotherhood Now

 

About The Center for Security Policy

 

The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public. For more information visit www.securefreedom.org

 

 Copyright © 1988-2018 Center for Security Policy | All Rights Reserved

 

Choose Pro-Life for Justice Kennedy’s Replacement


Justin Smith makes an excellent case for President Trump to nominate a Pro-Life and Constitutional Originalist to SCOTUS. Justin specifically posits the nomination to be Appellate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

 

JRH 7/9/18

Please Support NCCR

********************

Choose Pro-Life for Justice Kennedy’s Replacement

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 7/8/2018 8:41 PM

 

Under our God-given rights, Our Founders saw the law as a tool to preserve liberty and freedom for all, through the Western and Judeo-Christian principles and virtues that made the U.S. Constitution and our bicameral system possible. They did not see liberty under the law as anybody’s right to do anything, regardless of its reprehensible nature, and they certainly never intended to place America on a path where evil is called “good”, as the nation witnessed with the Supreme Court’s ruling on Roe v Wade. The Court was never supposed to be the final arbiter of law, becoming a tyrannical entity that seemingly answers to no one and places itself above all.

 

In this sense and in conjunction with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s impending retirement, President Trump is wrong not to question potential Supreme Court nominees regarding their position on Roe v Wade and whether or not they would overturn it, if given the opportunity. Any reluctance to do so is from a political concern and ignores the fact that Roe v Wade was given the force of de facto law by a Supreme Court that enforced its will and did not judge the case on any actual constitution basis, since the so-called “right” to abortion did not exist in the Constitution and they manufactured it out of thin air.

 

President Trump suggested that it somehow wouldn’t be “appropriate” to question his nominees on this. So, is murdering over 60 million unborn children since 1973 appropriate?

 

Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), an overt progressive, stated that she could not support any candidate who might be willing to overturn the despicable Roe v Wade Supreme Court ruling. She suggested that many years of “precedents” must somehow be viewed as “set law” as she parroted Democrat talking points and the likes of progressive Democrat activist Justices, such as Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

 

What about the hundreds of years of precedents that upheld the sanctity of life and protected life well prior to Roe V Wade?

 

Any person who views overturning the activist decision of Roe v Wade as a “big mistake is essentially willing to usurp an unborn child’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. They are either horribly ignorant or terribly callous in turning a blind-eye to the murder of a human person, committed in each abortion; but in either case, they are taking the position that protecting innocent life is not a moral good.

 

If Supreme Court precedents are set law, why isn’t Plessy v Ferguson and Lum v Rice still the law of the land? If these cases had not been overturned, America would still have segregation under the “law”. These were overturned by a later Court, because the Supreme Court is fallible.

 

However, ever since Marbury v Madison (1803) and the Court’s assumption that it was the primary interpreter of the Constitution, America has seen the Supreme Court define its own power, and increasingly and regularly, America has seen the Supreme Court usurp power and act as if it is dominant over Congress and the Office of the President, which is contrary to the Founders’ Original Intent. Marbury has been cited by the Court to invalidate laws in over 200 cases, even though Marbury v Madison does not contain any actual assertion that the Court has exclusive authority to bind other parts of government.

 

Thomas Paine, one of our Founders, once noted, “All power exercised over a nation … must be either delegated, or assumed … All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation.”

 

The rights Thomas Jefferson lists in the Declaration of Independence are certainly open to interpretation, but according to our Founders, their metaphysical basis, found in nature itself, is not. However, activist Justices have now long impressed their notions of what they believe the Constitution should say, upon all America. As a result, America was handed rulings that removed prayer and the Ten Commandments from schools, pornography on demand, abortion and homosexual “marriage”.

 

Some call retiring Justice Kennedy a “moderate” because he voted along conservative lines fifty-seven percent of the time, but how anyone reaches this conclusion is disturbing, especially once one looks at some major cases. Kennedy voted too often to advance the deviant and perverted homosexual agenda in America, although this segment of society represents only a mere 3 to 4 percent of the population. Kennedy knocked down Texas’s sodomy laws, the upheld Roe v Wade twice and he voted in favor of homosexual “marriage”, aiding in making a mockery of traditional marriage and the only true meaning of marriage — the union between one man and one woman in Holy Matrimony before God. This is not a “conservative” or a “moderate”.

 

By the time this is released, Pres. Trump will have made his pick for the Supreme Court. Let us all pray that he chooses Amy Coney Barrett, the 46 year old Justice of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,  who is a pro-life Catholic mother of seven and a strong Constitutionalist. Ms. Barrett was also awarded the top student award from Notre Dame Law School in 1997.

 

President Trump cannot deny, that these illiberal anti-Constitution proponents of abortion stand firmly opposed to the conservative philosophy, which is the protector of America’s founding ideas, those ideas of life and liberty so many American patriots have died defending. As such, President Trump and Congress should unabashedly state that they will move to place a pro-life nominee on the Supreme Court, such as Amy Barrett, because modern Justices no longer seem capable of just determining the constitutionality of any particular law, in accordance with the Founders’ Original Intent; rather, they seek to wield the Supreme Court like a club to meet the demands of whatever political agenda at hand at any given moment, during a time that the anti-Constitution progressive Democrats have certainly made no secret that defending baby murder is an integral part of their fight to accept or reject any candidate for the Supreme Court.

 

As Christians, we are bound to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves and to reject the lies and the evil of an abortion industry that murders the image of God approximately 1.5 million times a year in America. No one should ever call such a heinous crime a “right”.

 

And in the meantime, America must put forth the necessary effort and work to reign in an out-of-control Supreme Court, as the admonishment and prophesy of Brutus, one of the great anti-Federalists guiding the Constitution’s ratification debate, has become our present-day reality: “The Supreme Court under this Constitution would be exalted above all other power in the government, and subject to no controul … There is no power above them, to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under Heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of Heaven itself.” [Italic bold by Editor]

 

America must stop un-elected Supreme Court Justices from arbitrarily exercising power over the entire nation, our federal and state governments, in a manner that abrogates part of the Constitution itself, as it sets forth to define good and evil from the high court. And America must stop the reprehensible abortion industry and overturn Roe v Wade, and right the historic wrong that has perpetrated the worst mass murder in history, upon a nation that purportedly seeks to be blessed by God.

 

By Justin O. Smith

____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All source links as well as text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

Judicial Watch Videos Tackle Deep State


John R. Houk, Editor

Posted May 26, 2018

 

Here are two Judicial Watch posts which are a Mueller exposé video from 5/24 and a Tucker Carlson/Tom Fitton discussion on Fox News about the untrustworthiness of former DNI Director James Clapper.

 

JRH 5/26/18

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Inside Judicial Watch: Mueller UNMASKED–Featuring Congressman Louie Gohmert

 

Inside Judicial Watch

May 24, 2018

Judicial Watch

 

NEW–Catch the latest edition of Inside Judicial Watch–with special guest Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) to discuss Robert Mueller’s career working in law enforcement–from the U.S. Attorney’s office to the special counsel investigation into alleged Trump/Russia collusion.

 

VIDEO: Inside Judicial Watch: Mueller UNMASKED–Featuring Congressman Louie Gohmert

 

Posted by Judicial Watch

Streamed live on May 24, 2018

 

In this edition of “Inside Judicial Watch,” host Jerry Dunleavy joins Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) to discuss Robert Mueller’s career working in law enforcement–from the U.S. Attorney’s office to the special counsel investigation into alleged Trump/Russia collusion.

 

Read Congressman Gohmert’s report here: https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

 

+++++++++++

Tom Fitton: ‘FBI and DOJ Cannot be Trusted’

 

MAY 25, 2018

Judicial Watch

 

VIDEO: Tucker: Washington’s unprecented [sic] hysteria over Russia

 

Posted by Fox News

Published on May 24, 2018

 

Tucker: Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claimed that Russia flipped the result of the 2016 election, but he has no evidence. There’s no evidence that any foreign country changed a single American vote. That was Clapper’s position two years ago, when it was Barack Obama’s position that vote tampering was completely impossible. Now that Trump is in office, he and other Democrats are warning that Russia will try to subvert this year’s midterms as well. #Tucker

 

May 25, 2018- JW President Tom Fitton appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on the Fox News Channel to discuss Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s claim that Russia flipped the election result.

 

____________________________

© 2018 Judicial Watch, Inc.

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

 

425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
888-593-8442

 

Contribute to Judicial Watch

 

About Judicial Watch

 

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations, and public outreach.

 

The motto of Judicial Watch is “Because no one is above the law”. To this end, Judicial Watch uses the open records or freedom of information laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities.

 

Litigation and the civil discovery process not only uncover information for the education of the American people on anti-corruption issues, but can also provide a basis for civil authorities to criminally prosecute corrupt officials. Judicial Watch seeks to ensure high ethical standards in the judiciary through monitoring activities and the use of the judicial ethics process to hold judges to account.

 

Judicial Watch’s investigation, legal, and judicial activities provide the basis for strong educational outreach to the American people. Judicial Watch’s public education programs include speeches, opinion editorials (op-eds), publications, educational conferences, media outreach, radio and news television appearances, and direct radio outreach through informational commercials and public service announcements.

 

Through its Open Records Project, Judicial Watch also READ THE REST

 

Arrogant and Defiant Illegal Aliens


Justin Smith expresses the opinion of Americans that elected President Trump to Office. Stop illegal alien immigration and move out the illegal aliens who refuse any path to E Pluribus Unum U.S. citizenship. E Pluribus Unum is a distinct contradiction to Leftist Multicultural Diversity. The American motto means we are a nation of immigrants that have ONE American culture. If any kind of immigrant refuses to assimilate into ONE nation, they must leave.

 

JRH 5/19/18

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Arrogant and Defiant Illegal Aliens

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 5/18/2018 12:35 AM

 

White hot anger danced across my mind at the sight of a horde of illegal alien invaders crossing the U.S. southern border, between April 27th and April 29th, as several climbed the border fence holding the Honduran flag, reminiscent of so many other incidents at the border when so-called “immigrants” waved Mexican and Guatemalan flags. This was an anger, a patriotic resentment, intensified by the sight of Pueblo Sin Fronteras (People Without Borders), a communist front group, alongside U.S. and foreign media and U.S. lawyers and advocates, such as Heather Cronk of ‘Show Up for Racial Justice’, who were paving the way for their crossing, as though these illegal aliens were entitled to enter America and the Americans themselves had no choice or say in the matter — a white hot anger that demands such “immigrants” be banned from America until Hell itself freezes over.

 

Most patriotic Americans feel the same flush of resentment, and that resentment is not softened by the sight of Mexican immigrants flying Mexican flags all across the nation at anti-President Trump and pro-illegal alien protests, especially when many Americans realize that there are many other nationalities, including Muslim majority countries, crossing with the Central American illegals. Neither does it help to ease that frustration once one understands that 800 different languages are now spoken in New York City and over a hundred are spoken in Los Angeles, and even though the United States spends billions of dollars on English classes for immigrant children, our country is reduced to pressing “1” for Spanish, “2” for English and “3” for Arabic.

 

These immigrants started out marching from the Honduran – Guatemala border in March and they trekked straight through Mexico, some two thousand at one point, to the U.S. border, primarily with approximately 1200 Hondurans, Guatemalans and Mexicans, along with a few other nationalities, where they sought to enter or actually crossed as “refugees” seeking asylum. The asylum ploy was well drilled into them by U.S. lawyers prior to them setting out on this journey, chanting and waving Honduran flags the entire way.

 

Despite their longing for a better life and wanting to escape the civil strife of Honduras and the wars of Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala, now fleeing organized crime and the gang violence of the infamous “northern triangle” region, it is hard not to fault them for not staying and fighting, with everything in themselves, in order to save their own countries. Americans did so during our War for Independence, because, for most of them, they had already fled intolerable situations, and America was the last stop.

 

Rush Limbaugh expressed best what all Americans were thinking when he stated: “What I can’t understand is the arrogance, the defiance of these people. I could comprehend someone wanting a better life, sneaking in, and, if caught, feeling apologetic. But these people are marching in front of cameras, in front of the whole world. They demand to be admitted here. Where does this sense of entitlement come from?”

 

Renown author, Ann Coulter recently wrote, “Why not be honest: Illegals are self-entitled lawbreakers and thieves, stealing jobs and government benefits meant for our own people.”

 

And what of those legal immigrants now residing here in America, who paid out many thousands of dollars on application, legal and expediting fees — what does this say to them?

 

Couldn’t these immigrants claim “refugee status” and protection in the first safe country they reach, meaning Mexico? They could, as noted by Secretary of Homeland Defense Kirstjen Nielsen. If Mexico feels no obligation to welcome these refugees, why should this obligation fall to America and Her people?

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions called this caravan “a deliberate attempt to undermine our laws and overwhelm our system”.  And he was right.

 

Rather than waving the American flag out of reverence and respect for our country, the one they want to call their new home, these “immigrants”, who had yet to file the first scrap of paperwork starting the process, were waving every flag except the American flag — the flags of hellholes they supposedly wish to escape. These are not “refugees”; they are invaders.

 

This caravan was never about asylum or refugees, at least not for People Without Borders. It was a concerted and well-funded effort to advance the Communist globalist agenda of breaking down sovereign borders, especially in America. One may have noticed that these penniless refugees had glossy new Honduran flags and pre-printed signs. They are funded by the leftist, fascist billionaire George Soros, who seeks to erode America’s sovereignty and demonize Her.

 

On Wednesday May 2, 2018 Jeff Sessions also stated: “We are not going to let this country be overwhelmed. People are not going [to] … stampede our border. … People should wait their turn, ask to apply lawfully before they enter our country.”

 

Sessions later went on to direct U.S attorneys to prosecute every illegal entry that they could. This directive came not only in response to the caravan arrival, but it was also a response to the recent DHS report that documented a 203 percent increase in illegal border crossings, between March 2017 and March 2018; the report also revealed the single largest month-to-month increase since 2011, noting a thirty-seven percent increase between February and March of 2018.

 

But America can’t seem to get a break. If it’s not Democrat leftists in Nashville protesting the Tennessee State Legislature’s proposed HB-2315 that prevents sanctuary cities from forming in the state, ever in pursuit of the illegal alien vote, it’s Speaker Paul Ryan proposing an amnesty bill for DACA in the House, that pleases forty Big Business first Republican legislators, as they also move to block President Trump’s agenda regarding border security, the visa lottery and chain migration. In the former, the Democrats allege that HB-2315 is a mass deportation bill, and although it is not, it should be.

 

Let that white-hot anger loose on Congress and state legislators, America, as the 2018 election approaches, and demand a mass deportation operation to remove some 35 million illegal aliens from our country, and force Congress to stop allowing 500,000 to a million illegal aliens annually to jump our borders. Use your white-hot anger to force Congress to put Americans above all refugees and place thirteen million American children living in poverty at the top of their list, along with five million unemployed and a million homeless Americans: Deport every illegal alien in the country now — round them up —  and don’t allow anymore, not one more, of these illegal aliens to barge into America, as if they have any right, a right that does not exist.

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All Source links are by the Editor

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Deep State Crimes Beginning to Spill


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 18, 2018

Hardly any media outlets whether TV, radio or print; inform on Deep State matters are being exposed. Why? Because the Mainstream Media (MSM) is Leftist and is the propaganda machine of the Deep State dedicated to take down our duly Elected President Donald Trump by whatever lie they can get to stick on the memories of the Americans that are gullible.

 

Because of this MSM blackout, I’m doing my part of cross posting the increasingly growing steady stream of news showing Deep State cadres are extremely close to being exposed form criminal activities.

 

JRH 5/18/18

Please Support NCCR

********************************

Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA Chief Led Operation To Frame Trump

 

BY BEN MARQUIS
MAY 16, 2018 AT 2:16PM

Conservative Tribune by WJ

 

The Trump campaign/Russian collusion narrative — which led to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation — has been steadily unraveling in recent weeks.

 

Despite a year long investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election, “no credible evidence” of collusion with the Trump campaign has been found, and the “evidence” and intelligence that has been offered up appears to be false and manufactured.

 

Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova spoke about that and other recent developments during an appearance on Fox News with Laura Ingraham on Tuesday night, and cast the blame on the operation, which he viewed as a set up to frame President Donald Trump, on former Obama administration CIA Director John Brennan.

 

“It was abundantly clear that there was no legitimate basis even for a counter intelligence investigation, let alone a criminal investigation,” DiGenova said.

 

“It is quite obvious that John Brennan was at the head of the group of people who were going to create a counter intelligence investigation against Trump by creating false information that was going to be fed through Carter Page, and fed through George Papadopoulos so that it would be picked up, reported back to Washington and provide the basis for a counter, a fake, counter intelligence investigation,” he continued.

 

“And it was all Brennan’s doing,” DiGenova stated emphatically.

 

“And that is why the Justice Department is viciously fighting revealing everything they can about the source in London, who everybody knows the identity of.”

 

Ingraham asked the former U.S. attorney to further explain recent reports about an unnamed “source” in London who allegedly provided information that was used as a basis for the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign.

 

“The source in London was another person who was feeding false information to George Papadopoulos and others about collusion which did not exist,” DiGenova replied.

 

Another guest on the program, former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, spoke about another aspect of the creation of the Trump/Russia collusion narrative and the anti-Trump dossier compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele on behalf of Democrat-funded political opposition research firm Fusion GPS.

 

She noted how the FBI had granted access to a handful of private contractors, likely to include Fusion GPS, to sift through raw intelligence gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This was then passed on to Steele and others and recycled back to the U.S. intelligence community with a false air of legitimacy to help form the narrative used as the basis for the investigation into Trump.

 

DiGenova picked up on what Powell had mentioned and pointed out that there had been two opinions issued by the FISA court in opposition to that illegal practice of allowing private contractors access to the sensitive raw intelligence data.

 

“All of that was designed for the unmasking and the leaking of the names, and that was all done by private contractors,” DiGenova said. “The FISA court objected to it and it never stopped.”

 

The supposition that Brennan was the ringleader of an attempt to “frame” Trump is little more than DiGenova’s opinion, informed however well it might be by experience and information obtained through public and private sources.

 

That said, it increasingly appears as though the entire Trump/Russia collusion narrative was indeed created wholly out of false, manufactured or misconstrued information in order to provide justification for the investigation that was likely intended to prevent Trump from winning the election, or at least hamstring his agenda and lead to his impeachment once he took office.

 

On top of that, Brennan has made it blatantly obvious that he loathes Trump, so it isn’t too much of a stretch to think he may have used the powerful intelligence tools at his disposal in order to “frame” an innocent man and destroy him politically. Hopefully we will find out the truth soon when the DOJ inspector general’s report is released.

 

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

++++++++++++++++

Trump: Obama FBI Spied on Campaign, ‘Bigger Than Watergate’

 

By Chris Agee
May 17, 2018 at 10:16am

The Western Journal

 

One paragraph from a recent New York Times article has sparked indignant reactions from President Donald Trump and a number of his political allies.

 

According to Fox News, the revelation that “at least one government informant met several times” with two advisers during the 2016 presidential cycle led to speculation that the FBI was conducting espionage within the Trump campaign.

 

The Times report indicated the informant met with both Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, prompting Trump and others to speculate about the extent of the operation within the Trump campaign.

 

In a tweet on the topic Thursday morning, the president cited National Review columnist Andrew McCarthy’s assessment of the new details.

 

 

“Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI ‘SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN EMBEDDED INFORMANT,’” Trump wrote. “Andrew McCarthy says, ‘There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.’”

 

He claimed the allegation, if true, would be a conspiracy “bigger than Watergate!”

 

That tweet came one year after the appointment of Department of Justice special counsel Robert Mueller, who has gone on to secure indictments against some of the figures involved in the investigation. Trump marked the anniversary by attacking those in charge of the probe.

 

 

In one tweet, he once again called the investigation a “Witch Hunt,” this time adding “disgusting” and “illegal” to his description.

 

Trump went on to claim that despite the DOJ probe, he has had “the most successful first 17 month Administration in U.S. history – by far!”

 

Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who was added to the president’s legal team last month, weighed in on the latest news by discusing [sic] a scenario in which former FBI Director James Comey should face criminal prosecution.

 

He appeared on “Fox & Friends” on Thursday to decry the behavior outlined in The Times article.

 

“That would be the biggest scandal in the history of this town, at least involving law enforcement,” Giuliani said.

 

According to The Times report, however, the FBI had been investigating Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton for some time regarding her email server controversy prior to dedicating any resources to Trump’s team. When the assignment came late in the election season, officials were reportedly specifically tasked with investigating four campaign associates: Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and the aforementioned Page and Papadopoulos.

 

Regardless of the extent of the investigation, Giuliani expressed confidence that the FBI did not gather any evidence against the Trump campaign.

 

“If there’s a spy, they got nothing from it,” he said.

 

Nevertheless, Giuliani suggested Comey “should be prosecuted” if he ordered the investigation.

 

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Here We Go=> Mueller Gives Manafort Judge Unredacted Rosenstein Memo

 

By Cristina Laila

May 17, 2018

Gateway Pundit

 

Robert Mueller’s office begrudgingly gave Judge T.S. Ellis the unredacted Rosenstein memo detailing the Special Counsel’s scope in a sealed court filing Thursday.

 

Robert Mueller

 

Reuters reported:

 

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office notified a federal court in Virginia on Thursday it had filed under seal an unredacted memorandum that is expected to shed light on the scope of his wide-ranging probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

 

Judge T.S. Ellis lost his temper a couple weeks ago in a Manafort hearing and accused Mueller’s prosecutors of using the case against Trump’s former campaign chairman to oust the President from office.

 

The Reagan-appointed judge also ordered the government to hand over the unredacted Rosenstein memo.

 

The Judge told Mueller’s prosecutors, “We don’t want anyone with unfettered power.”

 

Mueller’s prosecutors argued they have certain authorities given to them which were laid out in Rosenstein’s August 2017 memo.

 

Judge Ellis scoffed at Mueller’s prosecutors who argued the memo has to be kept a secret because of ongoing investigations and ordered the unredacted memo to be released within a two week time frame.

 

And here we are; Judge Ellis now has the unredacted memo.

 

Stay tuned. The Gateway Pundit will be reporting on Judge Ellis’ response to this memo and to Manafort’s motion to have Mueller’s case against him dismissed.

+++++++++++++++++++

IG Report: FBI & DOJ Broke Law In Clinton Email Investigation – Referred For Criminal Charges

 

IG Horowitz has found “reasonable grounds” for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution

 

By TIM BROWN

MAY 17, 2018

Freedom Outpost

 

The Department of Justice’s Inspector General has released a report which indicated that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the DOJ both broke the law during the probe into Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server.

 

The report was kept private, but The Wall Street Journal reported:

 

Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks.

 

However, Former D.C. bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, Hoover Institution media fellow, and author of several books, including bestseller INFILTRATION, Paul Sperry, tweeted out that the IG is turning over a referral to the DOJ for possible criminal charges in the matter.

 

“IG Horowitz has found “reasonable grounds” for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution,” he tweeted.

 

 

Sperry continued, “Comey/Yates targeted Gen. Flynn in C.I. investigation a yr BEFORE he communicated w Russian ambassador in Dec 2016 as a transition official–and the trigger was Flynn sitting at same table w Putin at Dec 2015 Moscow event, even tho Green Party’s Jill Stein also at table.”

 

 

“As the IG prepares to release his next report, Sally Yates is suddenly animated & agitated. She is tweet-storming against Trump, giving speeches bashing Trump, and spinning her role in the investigations in the New York Times. Yates appears worried about something ahead of report,” Sperry added.

 

 

Tyler Durden goes into detail over at Zero Hedge on recapping what all has taken place and what is expected to take place as a result of the report.  He believes that this is the foundation for appointing a Special Counsel.

 

He writes:

 

Once congress has reviewed the OIG report, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees will use it to supplement their investigations, which will result in hearings with the end goal of requesting or demanding a Special Counsel investigation. The DOJ can appoint a Special Counsel at any point, or wait for Congress to demand one. If a request for a Special Counsel is ignored, Congress can pass legislation to force an the appointment.

 

And while the DOJ could act on the OIG report and investigate / prosecute themselves without a Special Counsel, it is highly unlikely that Congress would stand for that given the subjects of the investigation.

 

After the report’s completion, the DOJ will weigh in on it. Their comments are key. As TrumpSoldier points out in his analysis, the DOJ can take various actions regarding “Policy, personnel, procedures, and re-opening of investigations. In short, just about everything (Immunity agreements can also be rescinded).

 

 

With the wheels set in motion last week seemingly align with Congressional requests and the OIG mandate, and the upcoming OIG report likely to serve as a foundational opinion, the DOJ will finally be empowered to move forward with an impartially appointed Special Counsel.

 

 

The question now though is, will we ever see any justice in the matter concerning Hillary Clinton’s crimes?  It’s one thing to deal with criminal activity in the DOJ and the FBI, even though it’s like the fox guarding the henhouse.  It’s another to actually deal with a woman, who we know because of the evidence we’ve seen and the laws we have, who knowingly broke the law.

 

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.comSonsOfLibertyMedia.comGunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his “more precious than rubies” wife, father of 10 “mighty arrows”, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. . Follow Tim on Twitter. Also check him out on Gab and Steemit

++++++++++++++++++++

WSJ Reporter: We’ve Confirmed the Worst – US Intel Truly Was Spying on Trump Camp

 

BY CILLIAN ZEAL
MAY 17, 2018 AT 7:05AM

Conservative Tribune by WJ

 

 

Kimberley Strassel (WSJ) & James Comey

 

A Wednesday piece by The New York Times which details the FBI’s investigation into Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign may have revealed more than intended, at least if a Wall Street Journal reporter who has covered the surveillance previously is correct.

 

The Journal’s Kimberley Strassel has written about the investigation in the past. In a piece last week, she posited that the FBI may have used a mole in the Trump campaign, particularly given the Department of Justice’s reluctance to turn over information about the informant to congressional investigators.

 

The Times piece revealed more details about the Trump campaign surveillance operation — called “Crossfire Hurricane” in reference to the Rolling Stones song “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” — and just how extensive it was.

 

While the tenor of the article, which was written by Matt Apuzzo, Adam Goldman and Nicholas Fandos, is overwhelmingly favorable to the FBI and dismisses any claims that the surveillance was politically motivated, (“I never saw anything that resembled a witch hunt or suggested that the bureau’s approach to the investigation was politically driven,” one DOJ official is quoted as saying) there were a few things buried deep in there that specifically caught Strassel’s attention.

 

In a tweetstorm Wednesday evening, Strassel noted key problems in The Times’ narrative, particularly when the story appeared and significant facts that they glossed over.

 

Strassel first argued that the article was a calculated leak of sorts in an effort to get out ahead of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and the information that he’s gathering and releasing regarding the FBI’s sources on the Trump investigation.

 

 

However, she says it proves what Trump was claiming all along: namely, that his campaign was being spied upon.

 

 

The story briefly mentions that “one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos, current and former officials said. That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump’s allies questioning whether the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials.”

 

However, if that informant met several times with two low-level Trump campaign officials, one wonders just what his role — if any — in the Trump campaign might have been. It seems somewhat unlikely that a random individual outside the campaign would have had the opportunity to meet with both George Papadopoulos and Carter Page without some suspicion being aroused if the informant didn’t have extremely close ties to the campaign.

 

 

 

Strassel then noted the fact that if the FBI is willing to leak information that makes them look good to media sources, they shouldn’t have any problem complying with the subpoena that the House Intelligence Committee issued.

 

She also pointed out that the FBI had claimed the dossier had little to no influence on the investigation.

 

 

 

 

Sally Yates, for those of you with short memories, was the deputy attorney general under former President Barack Obama.

 

Strassel closed with a shot at the DOJ and James Comey.

 

 

This is arguably the biggest story in quite some time. We already knew that intelligence had been weaponized by Obama-era apparatchiks to get a FISA court to agree to surveillance and that the Trump dossier had been prepared using money from the Clinton campaign. However, we’re beginning to realize it went deeper than that — and it could have included a mole in the Trump campaign itself.

 

If it did, we need to know. No more of this drip-drip-drip of information specifically designed as a limited hangout. It’s time that the American people are appraised, once and for all, just how far the Obama administration went in using the apparatus of the federal government to infiltrate the campaign of their political adversary.

 

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

__________________________

Deep State Crimes Beginning to Spill

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 18, 2018

________________________

Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA Chief Led Operation To Frame Trump

 

Trump: Obama FBI Spied on Campaign, ‘Bigger Than Watergate’

 

WSJ Reporter: We’ve Confirmed the Worst – US Intel Truly Was Spying on Trump Camp

 

Conservative Tribune by WJ & Western Journal

_____________________

Here We Go=> Mueller Gives Manafort Judge Unredacted Rosenstein Memo

 

The Gateway Pundit

_________________

IG Report: FBI & DOJ Broke Law In Clinton Email Investigation – Referred For Criminal Charges

 

Freedom Outpost

 

Nothing Short of Treason


Intro to ‘Nothing Short of Treason’

Intro by John R. Houk

By Justin O. Smith

Posted May 1, 2018

 

Why in the heck are all these Democrats not at the very least facing a jury trial for criminal acts. When a Dem tells you the FBI has fully investigated say, Crooked Hillary and exonerate her, they are either willingly delusional, blinded by stupid political devotion or outright lying! FAR MORE evidence of crimes from Hillary, Comey, Clapper, Brennan and let’s not forget various Dems directly linked to FORMER President Obama than to President Trump or ANYONE indicted or convicted by Mueller that had absolutely nothing to do with Russia colluding with Trump to win the 2016 election.

 

Flynn pled guilty to lying about something he didn’t know he lied about until the Mueller found enough of a discrepancy to claim lying to the FBI. Manafort is indicted for bank fraud LONG before Donald Trump even decided to run for President. Michael Cohen is being investigated not Russia collusion but for the method Cohen used to fund an NDA with Stormy Daniels/Donald Trump sex (AGAIN way before Trump decided to run for President):

 

Update: The Washington Post reports that Cohen “is under federal federal [sic] investigation for possible bank fraud, wire fraud and campaign finance violations,” citing three people with knowledge of the case. (FBI raids office, hotel room of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; By Alayna Treene; AXIOS; 4/9/18)

 

I am frustrated and angry that the American legal system has become so politically corrupted that Dems get a complete pass for obvious crimes and Conservatives, Conservative supporters and Conservative Republicans get the book thrown at them merely for petty crimes that not even a local police force would use yet the FBI trapped them with petty finagling or zero evidence of a crime.

 

Justin Smith reminded me of this unequal justice that has impugned President to the tune of Treason. Justin correctly calls these Deep State Dems Amerikan Fascists.

 

JRH 5/1/18

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Nothing Short of Treason

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 4/28/2018 10:37 PM

 

Any act that seeks to unseat a duly elected U.S. President and his administration, through illegal means, although it might not be intended to overthrow our republic, undermines our republic in the same manner of an attempted governmental overthrow, as “peaceful” as it may be. Since well before the election of 2016, the American people now know, there were a group of anti-Donald Trump statist progressive Obama bureaucratic holdovers working diligently and under Obama’s direction, to subvert President Trump’s campaign, and, then afterwards, his administration and his presidency, using sabotage and espionage tactics, because they were just so angry that he beat the criminal-minded and corrupt Hillary Clinton so handily. Their actions are nothing short of treason. [Bold Text Blog Editor’s]

 

On Wednesday April 18th, Sara Carter, journalist extraordinaire, explosively divulged that Representative Ron DeSantis (R-Florida) and ten other Congressmen sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, U.S. Attorney John Huber and FBI Director Christopher Wray, which refers criminal charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey, and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe for their involvement in the trumped up investigations into Trump and known violations of federal law. Also named in this criminal referral were FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who made their anti-Trump bias well known in emails now in the hands of Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

 

Just as culpable and involved in this mess are former CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who leaked classified information like a rusty radiator leaks water. One must wonder when they too, along with many other co-conspirators, will have criminal charges proffered against them.

 

It was James Clapper who orchestrated the leak, through FBI Director James Comey and his friend Columbia Professor Daniel Richman, that President Trump may have been compromised by the Russians. This is revealed through Comey’s own words in recently released memos. And according to the House Intelligence Committee, in early 2017, Clapper leaked the details of the high-level government briefings on the Steele Dossier to CNN and lied to Congress about it.

 

As the letter states: “It would appear that Director Comey leaked classified information when sharing these memos with professor Richman. Accordingly, we refer James Comey to DOJ for potential violation(s) of: 18 USC 641, 18 USC 793, and 18 USC 1924.” And all of this was done, by Comey’s own admission, to ensure the appointment of a Special Counsel in order to persistently harass President Trump, even though he was not guilty of any wrong doing or any Russian collusion.

 

Without going into great detail, it is sufficient to say that Loretta Lynch was referred for possibly prosecution for allegedly threatening with reprisal the former FBI informant who came forward regarding the corrupt and criminal dealings inside the Uranium One deal and Clinton’s “pay for play” scheme, through the Clinton Foundation, while Andrew McCabe is on the firing line for violating three different laws as he lied under oath repeatedly and numerous times to FBI and the Office of the Inspector General investigators.

 

The primary allegation against Hillary Clinton states that she disguised payments to Fusion GPS to obfuscate her involvement in manufacturing the false Steele Dossier, that would later be used to illegally acquire a FISA warrant to run surveillance on Donald Trump and his inner circle. The criminal referral notes that those payments potentially violate 52 USC 30121 and 52 USC 30101 requiring the mandatory disclosure of these payments to the Federal Election Commission. However, the lawmakers also made mention of the January 22nd Wall Street Journal [Blog Editor: Need subscription to read past 1st paragraph] article that detailed texts between Strzok and Page and suggesting the FBI “eliminated evidence that Mrs. Clinton compromised high-level communications”. But Clinton is guilty of so much more, from Uranium One to Benghazi.

Foreign nationals are not supposed to influence our elections, but one should recall that Hillary’s campaign and the DNC, under her control, funneled $12 million dollars to the law firm of Perkins Coie, which paid Fusion GPS, and in turn, Fusion GPS hired Steele. Christopher Steele, former British MI-6 agent, was the only foreign influence on the 2016 election.

 

Since the presentation of false and unverified information from the Steele Dossier was the source cited before the FISA Court to obtain warrants for the surveillance of President Trump and one of his advisors, Carter Page, this too raised significant concerns. DeSantis and the others reference House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes’ letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions this March, as they recommended that charges be brought against “all DOJ and FBI personnel responsible for signing the Carter Page warrant application … for possible violations of 18 USC 242 and 18 USC 1505 and 1515b”.

 

While the letter spoke of “dissimilar degrees of zealousness” in the investigations into Clinton and Trump campaign associates, it went on to say, “we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately”. Is there really any question that these criminals broke numerous U.S legal codes coming and going, with impunity and no fear of prosecution, thinking themselves untouchable?

 

During the following press release, DeSantis stated: “The political elite are not immune from the rule of law, and those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as any other American. If former officials, including Hillary Clinton and James Comey, broke the law then they need to be held accountable. We ask that the Department of Justice move swiftly to ensure that violations of federal statutes by high officials are identified and prosecuted.”

 

Much of where the nation goes from here hinges on the May 8th report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Hopefully, he too will see the great need for quick and earnest prosecution of these criminals.

 

Furthermore, all of this perfectly illustrates that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s “investigation” is based on a lie. Now, although he has repeatedly and disingenuously stated that President Trump is not a target of the investigation, Mueller continues on by attacking any and all of the president’s closest aides and confidantes, dredging up several minor and unrelated “crimes”, as he attempts to force something to the surface that might implicate President Trump in a crime worthy of impeachment. It’s past time for this farce to come to a screeching halt, in the name of sanity and for our national security, as the President fries some bigger fish, like North Korea and Iran.

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced last month he had assigned a federal prosecutor to investigate the broader issues in this mess, while rejecting the notion of appointing a second Special Counsel to investigate the investigators and to see just how far to the top this goes. The pressure must be kept on these criminals until we have found every last damn one of them and receive a full accounting of exactly who was involved, since it must be incomprehensible to any cogent and logical thinker [to believe] that Barack Obama himself didn’t have a hand in this.

 

There have been about thirty trials for treason in the United States since 1789. America witnessed Mildred Gillars, an American broadcaster, and Robert Best, a journalist, convicted of treason after working for the Nazis to push their propaganda during WWII. The last people to be tried and executed for treason were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of passing U.S. atomic secrets to the Soviets in 1953. What these amerikan fascists, such as Clinton, Lynch, Comey and McCabe, have just done is infinitely worse than anything any other traitor to America has perpetrated across our history, and as such, it demands a harsh penalty. Perhaps America may soon see real swift and sure justice done once more, if the rule of law still exists and if our Republic is to be saved.

 

By Justin O. Smith

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and bracketed texts are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith