Will You Obey God or Will You Obey the Government? Frightening Challenges to Americans’ Conscience


I read this CBN article rapidly and did not notice President Trump’s name in it. BUT the theme of this article is the very reason the Dems, the RINOs and various forms of Leftists want Trump gone by any means necessary. The theme is Biblical-minded Christians are being placed in a position to choose between their Biblical Christian conscience and the ever increasing government mandate to de-Christianize American culture. President Trump is an obstacle to this Leftist de-Christianizing transformation.

 

For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. For to be [a]carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the [b]carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be. So then, those who are in the flesh cannot please God. –Romans 8: 5-8 NKJV

 

JRH 12/13/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

********************************

Will You Obey God or Will You Obey the Government? Frightening Challenges to Americans’ Conscience

 

By Paul Strand

December 11, 2019

CBN News

 

SCOTUS building

 

WASHINGTON – Religious liberty today faces more challenges than ever.  If you pay attention to the headlines, you know these are dangerous days. The battleground is often in the courtroom, where a frequent defender of religious liberty there sees new reasons for hope.

 

Becket Fund for Religious Liberty Senior Counsel Luke Goodrich points out every human has a conscience, and the government shouldn’t be messing with it.

 

“It’s that inner voice that urges us to choose the good and reject evil,” Goodrich told CBN News.

 

Big-Time Battler for Conscience Rights

 

He has fought for the right of conscience several times before the US Supreme Court, and writes about huge challenges to it in his new book titled Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America.

 

“When the government comes in and forces us to violate our conscience, it’s forcing us to go against our human nature and violating a fundamental human right,” Goodrich said.

 

But as America moves toward a post-Christian era, issues long felt by believers and their conscience as wrong are now exalted.  Therefore any opposition to them is condemned as rank discrimination.

 

‘Will You Obey God or Will You Obey the Government?’

 

Goodrich explained, “We have experienced a major cultural shift in the last 10 to 20 years where traditional Christian beliefs about truth, about human life, about human sexuality…they used to be fairly broadly accepted or at least uncontroversial, but now those long-standing Christian beliefs are actually viewed as a threat.”

 

He added, “We’re seeing all kinds of new religious liberty conflicts and Christians really being put to the choice: will you obey God or will you obey the government?”

 

The biggest current battleground: homosexual and transgender rights.

 

“If you’re a Bible-believing Christian and you hold a traditional view on sex and marriage, then the rapid advance of gay rights is certainly the most significant religious liberty threat today.  And we’re seeing conflicts in multiple areas all across the country,” Goodrich noted.

 

The government long ago said you can’t discriminate based on someone’s race or sex. If the Supreme Court this term rules “sex” includes sexual orientation or transgender status, it could mean real trouble for those with biblical views on human sexuality.

 

Jack Phillips x Thousands

 

You could likely multiply by the thousands new legal problems of the kind suffered by Christian baker Jack Phillips, who refused to make a cake celebrating gay marriage and ended up in a legal battle over his conscience rights for years.

 

“Thousands of religious organizations will face new lawsuits and new liability simply for acting on their long-standing beliefs about human sexuality,” Goodrich predicted.

 

At one point, supporters promised same-sex marriage wouldn’t harm anyone. Well, depending on how the high court rules, Goodrich pointed out those same people could go all out, claws bared, to get their opponents.

 

“There’s a strong effort right now, particularly among progressives, to brand traditional Christian beliefs about marriage as a form of bigotry, and then use the power of the state to punish those religious beliefs and practices,” he said.

 

Bigotry or Believing in What’s Actually Best?

 

On the other hand, Frank Wright of D. James Kennedy Ministries maintains believers back only one-man, one-woman marriage because it’s healthy for families.

 

“The Bible says it because it’s for our welfare. It’s what enables families to flourish,” Wright told CBN News. “The secular research going back decades is irrefutable. Children do better when they have a mom and a dad.  And they are safer, they are more economically secure, they have less bad outcomes in life in terms of drugs and crime and all these things. It’s God’s design because it’s what’s best for us.”

 

He’s sad that homosexuals and their allies view the conservative support of one-man, one-woman marriage as bigotry and hatred.

 

Wright explained, “If they were to come to me and say ‘Why do you hate me?’ I would explain to them that I don’t. ‘You and I see this issue totally differently.  I don’t hate you.  Why should I hate you?   And why should you hate me because we disagree?'”

 

How Culture Views ‘Good’ Religion vs. ‘Bad’ Religion

 

Goodrich believes some of this comes from how modern society views religion.

 

“I think our culture is not really hostile to religion per se, but rather draws a distinction between good religion and bad religion,” he explained.

 

Goodrich added the culture sees so-called “good religion” as, “Fairly relativistic. You keep it private. You don’t make absolute truth claims and you don’t make any intense moral claims.”

 

On the other hand, this same culture sees bad religion as one that makes moral judgments among other things.

 

“Makes absolute truth claims. It doesn’t stay confined to the four walls of the home or the church, and it gets out there,” he said. “It evangelizes. It claims truth and it actually makes moral judgments.  And that kind of religion really today is deemed to be bad, and folks are much more willing to use government power to punish those sorts of belief.”

 

Forced to do the Transgenders’ Bidding

 

As for the transgender issue, the Obama administration mandated that doctors and hospitals provide surgery for men who wanted to be turned into women and women into men.

 

Goodrich explained the government was ordering doctors to perform those surgeries, “Even when it violated their religious beliefs and their medical judgment.  And if they didn’t do that, they would be deemed to be discriminating and would be subject to government penalties.”

 

Abortion is another battleground where supporters try to demonize those who can’t and won’t back it.

 

Those Against Abortion Labeled as Discriminators

 

“If you as a Christian, whether you’re a doctor or an employer, if you oppose abortion, you’re somehow denying health care to women and discriminating against women,” Goodrich explained.

 

This Becket lawyer fought for both the Little Sisters of the Poor and Hobby Lobby’s pro-life stand before the Supreme Court.

 

“The government was trying to force them to provide abortion-causing drugs in their health insurance plans or in their businesses, even when their conscience told them ‘you cannot participate in an abortion,'” Goodrich said of his clients.

 

Many Dark Clouds, But a Silver Lining

 

The high court ruled in favor of both, and Goodrich says believers can take hope in how often their conscience rights win in court.

 

“There are some real difficulties ahead, and we should take stock of where we’re at and be realistic. But at the same time, there’s a lot of reason for hope.  We have a 90 percent win rate and we’re undefeated at the US Supreme Court,” Goodrich said.

 

He warned, however, Christians need to prepare for defeats and learn how to show Christ’s love even to a culture that’s turning more and more against them.

 

How the Bible Can Guide Us in Such a Time

 

“Much of scripture is written to Christians who are facing suffering and persecution for their faith.  And as Christians, we need to recall those teachings and let those influence us,” Goodrich argued. “And it’s not just about winning or fighting a culture war.  It’s actually more about being like Christ in the midst of these conflicts.”

 

What this attorney hopes for is a government that just leaves religion alone as much as possible.

 

For instance, in public schools, it shouldn’t force students to pray, but can allow a time where they can pray if they want. It shouldn’t build a cross on government property, but it can let those there stand. It shouldn’t oppose religion OR promote it. It should just let it be.

+++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

____________________

© 2019 The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc., A nonprofit 501 (c)(3) Charitable Organization.

 

SUPPORT CBN News

 

Reason and/or Path to Support Blog


John R. Houk

© December 6, 2019

 

**** BLOG UPDATE!!!! ****

December 7, 2019

 

About half way down this post I used the phrase “Here comes trouble” in alluding to actually using the name of my wife’s Healthy Coffee business name in promoting the business.

 

BOY was I correct. I am officially in the proverbial dog house! Evidently by the time Diana my lovely wife awoke and began her day of selling and promoting her Healthy Coffee business sticklers for following policies and procedures evidently were doing some finger pointing toward her.

 

SO, as you scroll down all the information I regard helpful contrasting the difference between the blessings of a product-driven Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) and a NO-Product (and in most cases illegal) Pyramid/Ponzi Scheme will remain. Because I gotta tell ya that is some darn good info to know.

 

SADLY, all information referencing my wife’s DARN GOOD product driven MLM company will disappear to gratify the sticklers for “policies and procedures”. I would deliver some fine words for those sticklers because it is in my nature to be cranky over such frivolous issues ESPECIALLY since I was being quite complimentary, but my dog house might get a big heavy chain attached to it and baby it’s cold outside.

 

But I am sticking to the point of appreciating dedicated support for this blog. BUT hoping to get out of the dog house I NEED to disassociate any blog support I receive away from the great products of my wife’s Healthy Coffee business. The two are NOT synonymous even though marriage to a successful network marketing spouse does contain benefits personally BUT NOT AT ALL ASSOCIATED TO THIS POLITICALLY ORIENTED blog.

 

I did not think through my Conservatism my be a blot on Left-thinking politically oriented entrepreneurs that might be in the same Healthy Coffee business. MY FAULT! I should have realized Left-thinkers actually use free enterprise marketing as much as Conservatives. I could go on but I sense my dog house chain might be getting larger.

 

So for the future I will stick to soliciting support for this blog and if you want to look into Healthy Coffee for personal use or building your own income earning Networking business, I’ll stick to using wife’s one of many purchased domain names that re-direct to her Healthy Coffee business (cough that would be SkinnyOptimumCoffee.com). For the policies & procedures sticklers, even the embedded links below containing the actual fantastic Healthy Coffee name have been removed and replaced with Diana’s re-direct purchased domain name.

 

**** END OF UPDATE ****

 

If you visit my blogs I always place my initials followed by the date of posting at the end of my thoughts or introduction to another’s thoughts.

 

Under my initials are links soliciting support for reading my blog post. Of late I have noticed an increase in readership but a decrease in financial support. I am a Baby-Boomer on a disability fixed income and had enjoyed the monetary remuneration my mostly Conservative, sometime Counterjihad and less often Christian posts would bring in.

 

Knowing Americans are typically people who like told tangibility in their hands when they lay out their earned cash, I thought to increase family revenue by adding links to my loving wife’s healthy coffee business for people to be supportive and have a product in hand.

 

So, I am going to step away a bit from Conservative politics and write about the healthy coffee business. I really should have my wife share as a contributor because she’s the business person in the family, but I sense I need to share some personal thoughts.

 

Healthy Coffee Business

 

The Coffee business is a home-based business which in case you are unaware means typically a multi-level marketing company is involved.

 

People either love or hate multi-level marketing.  The love part typically arises from successfully adding (at least) some part time income to your full time job. The hate part typically arises when you buy into the potential but discover you don’t do a bit of work no extra income comes into your product.

 

Like any income situation, you work you get paid. You don’t work, you don’t get paid. In a normal job no work means you get fired. In most multi-level marketing (MLM) companies no work simply means no pay-out. Some MLM companies require an annual re-up fee to stay active while some don’t. The no-work MLM haters are really irritated with re-upping if no cash is coming in AGAIN from no working.

 

Are MLMs a Pyramid Scheme or Ponzi Scheme?

 

The difference between a legitimate MLM company and a Pyramid Scheme is the existence of a product.

 

Pyramid Schemes have ZERO product. Income or earnings are solely based in signing up and creating a network of people buying into whatever the Pyramid is called or labelled. The people at the top of the Pyramid make the most money with the people making little to nothing. All Pyramids collapse when people stop signing up WHICH is the Pyramid Schemes are illegal in most States. When Pyramids collapse the suckers at the bottom lose their investment or investments while many Pyramid people at the top go to jail or run and hide with ill-gotten gain. The most infamous Pyramid/Ponzi Scheme was perpetrated by Bernie Madoff which you can read about HERE.

 

MLM Product Driven Yet Pyramid-Like

 

If there is no product the Pyramid ALWAYS collapses. The people with the best business acumen build a network of sellers and coach your sellers to also build a network of sellers. The network stack is the appearance of a Pyramid, BUT unlike the NO-Product scheme the Network Stack is product driven. The stack can fail if sellers stop selling. That is where business acumen comes in: MLM business builders constantly have to keep signing up good salesmen (or saleswomen) because people lose interest or move onto to another interest.

 

The beauty of an MLM is you make as much money as the work you put into it. Some people just want to sell enough the product to achieve a particular goal such as make some Christmas present buying cash, make some car payments or some other small but needed goal.

 

Others have loftier goals and may want to buy a house or set up a retirement income. Sales people with lofty goals are typically network builders.

 

The bottom line though the MLM is a product driven company ALSO trying to turn a profit. If you have specific short term goal, frankly it may not matter much about an MLM company’s product sustainability. What matters is if you believe you can sell that product to attain your short term goal. If you have loftier goals you are going to want research an MLM company for its longevity indicating the success rate of its product and just how lucrative the financial compensation is. (NOTE: You are looking for COMPENSATION for work rather than a RETURN on an investment. Companies offering investment returns might be a red-flag for Pyramid Scheme.)

 

MY Wife’s Healthy Coffee

 

I got to tell ya this is where I may be getting my wife in trouble. TYPICALLY MLM companies only like or allow approved content when the company name is used in connection to their product. I am not an actual sales rep with my wife’s company BUT thanks to holy matrimony, I definitely benefit from the compensation she receives. On a personal level, I simply am not a good salesman. So, I stick to blogging.

 

My wife has purchased a host of domain names that does not incorporate the actual MLM company name to stay out of trouble. Those domains if clicked upon ALL are redirected to her personal company website where you can buy product or find out how to join the company at various levels. The higher the level in the company the greater the COMPENSATION.

 

If you just want to try some product – HEALTHY COFFEE is central but not the only product – to see what the buzz is about, the sale obviously benefits my wife. On my SlantRight 2.0 blog was able to add a banner on a side panel with one her domain names. That domain name in that panel is SkinnyOptimumCoffee.com.

 

Diana – my wife – signed up under the “Business Builder” option which the Healthy Coffee business calls the Ruby position working for higher positions. Contact Diana on business opportunities and any answers she doesn’t know yet, Diana knows people doing the Healthy Coffee business who does know: dianahouk@cox.net.

 

Diana’s 2018 Before & After Photo on her Business Cards

In my case before using the Healthy Coffee business products I weighed 383 pounds. After my last Doctor’s visit a couple of months ago I now weigh 298 pounds. I’m still a big dude looking to lose weight. I gotta tell ya though, I haven’t been in the 200 pound stratosphere in nearly a decade. Diana’s weight loss has been more dramatic, but as you can surmise she is more conscientious about what she eats. Me … not so much. I just don’t consume as much thanks to the products and largely the coffee. Since I began to pay attention, without trying I’ve been losing 3 to 5 pounds every three months that has translated into losing 85 pounds.

 

Sooooo …. Buy some coffee or other health products, or become a business builder by signing up scroll down for level of entrance (ask Diana how to upgrade level) for your own network or tell me you like reading my Blog by clicking my PayPal link.

 

JRH 12/6/19 – UPDATED 12/7/19

 

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems


John R. Houk

© December 4, 2019

 

President Donald Trump has faced Leftist and Dem venom from the very point he decided to run as a Republican for President of the United States. I don’t know about you but just as a Conservative voter I was a bit mystified by this venom.

 

Trump’s entertainment days were not exactly a paradigm of Conservative values. I mean entertainment-wise, I enjoyed watching Donald Trump telling an Apprentice contestant not meeting Trump business standards that he/she had a – “YOU’RE FIRED!” It was fun to watch, but not exactly an endorsement for Family Values.

 

YET the Donald announces a GOP run and all of a sudden Leftist politicians, former Leftist pals in Entertainment and the ever wicked Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) all of a sudden hated Trump’s guts. These haters vilified and ridiculed Donald Trump and at the time … I didn’t care. I was voting for the most reputable Family Values Republican in Senator Ted Cruz.

 

BUT WHAT HAPPENED?

 

GOP candidate after candidate went down in flames to the witticism of Donald Trump. Finally, my guy Ted Cruz was eliminated by the numbers and Trump won the Republican nomination for President in 2016.

 

Leftist Politicians, Left-Wing Entertainers (former Trump buddies mind you) and of course RINOs proclaimed from the roof tops that the Republican Party just handed POTUS to Hillary Clinton –

 

  • the gal with an illegal government server as Secretary of State

 

 

 

 

  • the gal who as Dem Nominee for President had her Democratic National Committee (DNC) hacked (by someone) exposing nefarious Dem practices via Wikileaks

 

  • the gal while Dem Nominee told everyone the Russians and Trump meddle in the 2016 election YET would not all an FBI/CIA forensic examination of DNC to confirm Dem client Crowdstrike assertions “the Russians did it.”

 

*Was the DNC server really hacked? By George Parry; Knowledge is Good; 3/4/18

*NSA Whistleblower Has Evidence DNC Was NOT Hacked By Russia, Mueller Report Completely Based on Lies; American Liberty Report

 

*Probe: Hard evidence refutes DNC ‘Russia hack’ claim; By WND Staff; WND; 2/14/19 8:00pm

 

 

  • THE SAME GAL who as the Dem Nominee for President worked with Ukrainians to win the 2016 election she LOST to Donald Trump.

 

*Let’s get real: Democrats were first to enlist Ukraine in US elections; By John Solomon; The Hill; 9/23/19 06:30 PM EDT

*Nunes: DNC Staffer Worked with Ukraine to Dig Up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election; By Melanie Arter; CNSNews.com; 11/13/19 12:35pm EST

 

The above points are only those I recall off the top of mind, I am certain others could add more egregious actions under Crooked Hillary and her Dem Party.

 

AND YET the Dems in the House as the Majority Party are conducting Impeachment proceedings in which a majority of States via the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump as President of the United States.

 

ONLY a Dem concerned about Trump’s reversing Obama’s fundamental transformation of America away from our nation’s Christian roots and away from our Founding Fathers’ Original Intent for America embodied in the Declaration of Independence and Ratified U.S. Constitution would support the Impeachment witch hunt being conducted in the House of Representatives.

 

And now I come to the inspiration for these thoughts. Yesterday Israpundit cross posted an American Thinker post referring to Judge Jeanine entitled, “Obama started the Trump hate”. The title sounds more like every Dem involved in this coup against President Trump in Congress and the Executive Branch (and perhaps every Obama Judiciary appointee) should be impeached.

 

JRH 12/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

*************************

Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

 

By M. Catharine Evans, AMERICAN THINKER

December 3, 2019

Israpundit

 

Almost four years into the war on Donald Trump, any mention of Obama’s role in the banana republic tactics has been covered up.  The fact that high-ranking Obama-appointed FBI/CIA/intelligence officials have been caught plotting to delegitimize an election and remove President Trump from office makes it a sure bet that Obama, the consummate community organizer, had a tight leash on everything going on in the White House.  During her show this past Saturday, Judge Jeanine Pirro and her guest, The Plot against the President author Lee Smith, specifically called out Barack Obama for “interfering in the peaceful transition of power” in 2016.  It’s about time.

 

The five-minute interview, which aired on Fox’s Justice with Judge Jeanine, boiled this impeachment nightmare down to its essence: Barack Hussein Obama is the first president to orchestrate a coup against an incoming administration.  Smith even went on to suggest that Obama has set up a command post less than two miles from the White House.  As the “de facto head of the Democratic Party still … Barack Obama is right in the middle of the anti- Trump operation,” according to Smith.

 

Judge Jeannine then recalled Obama’s actions weeks before the 2016  election:

 

Watching Barack Obama taking the week off and doing nothing but campaigning for Hillary Clinton … to me I just remembered thinking to myself that’s a little weird, um, I know Presidents support incoming but that was full-on, all-in Barack Obama worried about Trump, making fun of Trump, it had never happened that way in the history of this country.  He started the Trump hate.

 

VIDEO: Author Lee Smith: Barack Obama Interfered with the Peaceful Transfer of Power to President Trump

 

In October 2016, a Sun-Sentinel article reported that the Clinton campaign had “deployed the President to key battleground states.”  At each stop, Obama mocked, derided, and attacked candidate Trump.  When it looked as though a tough New York real estate mogul might actually beat Hillary Clinton, and worse, if elected, have the cojones to expose the Obama regime as the third-world Marxist corruptocrats they are, President Obama put everything on hold and went all in, as Judge Jeanine observed.

 

Obama’s strategy of inciting hatred of candidate Trump was nothing new.  For eight years, Obama had inspired his followers to hate America; rich white people; the police; corporations; private enterprise; and, most of all, those ‘God, family, country’ conservatives who would rise up in 2016 to reject yet another hater.

 

Barack and Michelle Obama’s record of malice toward this country, from Michelle’s racist Princeton thesis to her speech in South Carolina calling the U.S. “a downright mean country” to candidate Obama’s  disdain for working-class “gun and religion clingers,” laid the foundation of hate from which Trump Derangement Syndrome would emerge.

 

The unprecedented attempted overthrow of a duly elected president continues this week in more impeachment hearings as the Democrats throw everything at POTUS, hoping something sticks.  Against all logic, the Democrats and their voter base really, really hate Trump’s guts.  Jeanine Pirro rightly puts the blame for this hate-filled mockery of our Constitution on the Deep State’s figurehead: Barack Hussein Obama.

++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

______________________________

The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems

John R. Houk

© December 4, 2019

_______________________

Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

 

Copyright © 2017- Israpundit – All Rights Reserved

 

The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam


An Intro by John R. Houk

© December 3, 2019

OCD – Also known as Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I am a member of Michael Lederman’s MeWe Group called Islam: The Truth. I came across one of his posts yesterday where he examines some of the eccentricities of Islam’s founder known to the West as Muhammad (aka Mohammed or Mahomet and so on). According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica Mo’s name was: Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim, (born c. 570, Mecca, Arabia [now in Saudi Arabia]—died June 8, 632, Medina).

 

Lederman’s OCD examination is sure to rile Multiculturalists brainwashed to accept cultures not traditionally Western and Muslims brainwashed to believe Muhammad is the perfect example of a human man.

 

REGARDLESS, the Lederman OCD examination goes a long way to explain the virulent activities AGAINST non-Muslims. When a person with obvious OCD hang-ups is placed on a pedestal of perfection which a billion or more followers are told to emulate, that emulation definitively will NOT bode well for the non-Muslim and in my humble opinion, causes an inner socio-cultural harm among the devotees of Islam as well.

 

Because of the nature of this truth upsetting Muslims in particular (I could care less about upsetting a Left-Wing Multiculturalist – they self-destructive) I am not sharing on much Social Media. If you don’t mind the venom of Social Media Jail (e.g. Facebook & Twitter suspensions or bannings temporarily or longer), then share away and more to the truth of cultural survival.

JRH 12/3/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

***************************

Muhammad’s Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions

Michael Lederman – Owner

12/2/19

MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth

 

#thepeoplevsmuhammad

 

Sticky brain

 

We’ve covered a lot of ground in this particular section of Muhammad’s psychoanalysis and I believe it to be pertinent to conclude the investigation of this disorder with the aforementioned symptom, “Sticky brain.” What exactly does this peculiar mental anomaly entail? If a patient is to perform an action, or should an image pop into their thought process, often it becomes nigh impossible to forget and repeat.

 

Consequently, the individual will experience haunting memory echoes, compelling them to repeatedly check the procedure, verbalize the action, or perform a compulsive ritual attempting to replace or erase the thought from their consciousness. If one is to research OCD extensively, they will find that this compulsion is highly prevalent in those with the condition, and is the precursor before an individual descends into compulsive mental torture.

 

After researching the Hadith, chapter, and verse, it’s abundantly evident that Muhammad’s Islam gravitates entirely around his mental disorder. The symptom “sticky brain”, is echoed numerous times, and on one particular occasion, Muhammad verbally reprimands Aisha for exacerbating his condition:

 

Narrated Anas: Aisha had a thick curtain (having pictures on it) and she screened the side of her house with it. The Prophet said to her, “Remove it from my sight, for its pictures are still coming to my mind in my prayers.”

Sahih Bukhari 7:72:842

 

As you can see here, the evidence for the sticky brain is quite obvious. Muhammad must have suffered strong mental echoes for the remainder of his life, and consequently destroyed every piece of art. Perhaps this is also why the hijab was created, as the physical aspects of a woman’s face might also have perturbed him. And while Islam will purport that the prohibition for pictures derives from ‘idolatry’, their assertion is simply erroneous upon acknowledging this tradition and the following.

 

Thus, if any reader still has doubts about whether Muhammad did actually suffer from the illness, I shall re-introduce a Hadith tradition which will substantiate my claim:

 

Narrated by Anas

“Whenever Allah’s Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice.”

Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261

 

As we can see here, Muhammad was compelled to offer salutations and repeat himself over three times to adhere to his condition. For any rationally minded person, there is no need to conduct oneself as such, unless his followers were suffering from an epidemic of hearing difficulties.

 

However, I am fully aware that even the worst firebrand of Muslim apologists will refute my claim. And so, I will once again introduce another Hadith to reconfirm my suspicions. Again, the protracted account in the following tradition not only confirms Muhammad’s incapacity to refrain from his compulsive nature but proves that even his followers began to psychologically develop repetitive sticky brain because of him:

 

Narrated Abu Dharr:

I came to the Prophet while he was wearing white clothes and sleeping. Then I went back to him again after he had got up from his sleep.

 

He said, “Nobody says: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’ and then later on he dies while believing in that, except that he will enter Paradise.”

 

I said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?”

 

He said. ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft.”

 

I said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?”

 

He said. ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft.”

 

I said, ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?’

 

He said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft…”

Sahih Bukhari 7:72:717

 

No less than 3 times did Muhammad and his lackey refrain from repeating themselves. Ladies and gentlemen, this is obsessive-compulsive order defined! Hypothetically, to watch both OCD patients converse while living out their conversational compulsions would be a sight to behold. How exactly would they be able to break the habit is unfathomable.

 

However, if you are still not convinced, and believes that the ‘prophet’ most probably was only highly eccentric and exceptionally particular in his conduct, I suggest them to watch The Aviator (2004) based on the life of the OCD stricken, Howard Hughes. The very last scene of the film exposes the extent of “sticky brain” as Hughes suffers a complete mental breakdown, compulsively repeating a particular phrase to himself.

 

Throughout the traditions, there is a pattern of compulsion of which he conformed to. It’s abundantly clear the ‘prophet’ was afflicted with the condition considering that he never gave any plausible explanation for his odd ways. However, it’s obvious that his schizophrenia invariably played a crucial role in his OCD, as his hallucinations effectively trickled down into daily ritual and routine. Evidently, the majority of his perturbing actions were the brainchild of his psychotic delusions. The irony is that Muslims believed his irrational behavioral compulsions were ‘divine’, sent by Allah. When in truth, his example was nothing more than a mental illness which remained undiagnosed for over 1400 years.

 

OCD is so common, that up to 3% of adults and children suffer from the condition. Ironically, just like every other mental illness, Muhammad possessed, early Muslims were also compelled to imitate another psychological disorder of his. Evidently, the extent of his illness saw his ordinances unabatedly grow out of control to form a tightly constrictive society based on psychologically compulsive affiliations including washing, checking, counting, launching paranoid accusations and developing spiritual anxieties. Yet, it’s amazing how Islam still continues to flourish considering the detrimental nature of it’s so-called ‘godly’ commandments pertaining to hygiene.

 

The life-threatening bacteria contained in the Zam Zam Well and the Well of Buda’ah should’ve killed off the early Muslims before Sharia could ever take hold in the region. Likewise, the mass consumption of camel urine should’ve also finished the cult as it’s only recently been reported that the bacteria replete excretion has been linked to MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).

 

If we acknowledge Muhammad’s excessive wastage of precious water, which he squandered for his personal obsessions over ‘cleanliness’, it’s abundantly clear that early Islamic cult members would’ve been appalled by his irresponsibility with the vital resource. It’s highly likely he was aware of growing resentment, as Arabs would’ve culturally considered water as the highest priority; their life’s blood. Thus fearing a full-scale revolt, the grandmaster of the universe qualified urine as a substitute for the consumption of water.

 

Sadly, because Muhammad’s irrational behavior continued unabated until his death, his followers were never able to recognize his illness and accepted that his OCD was entirely normal. This was the consequence of years of psychological grooming, and having the ‘prophet’ repeatedly drum into their psyche’s that his example mirrored god. They only had themselves to compare to the ‘prophet’ of whom he regarded himself as the ‘perfect human’. The irony is that his disciples’ rational thinking became irrational, and vice versa.

 

It’s evident from the repetitive patterns of his compulsions, Muhammad desperately tried to control his illness, yet this only made matters worse. Psychologists who prescribe ‘cognitive behavior therapy’ teach patients not to give in to their repetitive thinking, and advocate breaking the habit. Had the ‘prophet’ been aware of this technique, it may have helped him overcome his affliction. Although, it’s highly probable that his illness derived from genetic influence.

 

It’s assumed that hereditary genetics plays a strong role in the individual obtaining the condition. If we study Muhammad’s life and genetic line, it’s possible that not only he, but many of his predecessors within the Quraish tribe suffered from OCD. Indicative of the religious compulsive characteristic, during the pre-Islamic era, the clan would compulsively circumambulate the Ka’aba seven times (an odd number) and obsessively prostrate themselves before the edifice. Likewise, the fact that they were exceptionally superstitious folk who unapologetically believed in jinn, solar eclipses that signified omens, lunar-based holidays like Ramadan, and phobias of females, of which lead to infanticide, could all be attributed to a hereditary genetical disposition for the condition. Or perhaps their fundamental religious tenets were created by one of whom was an afflicted individual.

 

This is not a preposterous argument as even today, there are many non-Muslims who will take a pinch of salt, and throw it behind their left shoulder. While anyone will tell you that this particular ritual was born from superstition (attributed to Leonardo Da Vinci’s ‘Last Supper’, throwing salt at the devil’s face), it’s more likely the byproduct of an obsessive compulsive’s anxiety.

 

Nevertheless, the foundations of Islamic doctrine was built with Muhammad’s anxiety. Anxiety is a central component of fear. Fear is the core of OCD – the inherent worrying over things that are out of the individual’s control. And fear is what binds Islam together. And wherever there is fear, there is guilt. Guilt itself is also a key component in Islam’s inherited compulsive disorder. [Bold Text by Blog Editor]

 

As we are soon to discover, it’s possible that Muhammad felt unremitting guilt regarding his rampant sex-addition and especially his sexual encounter with his dead aunt. These haunting incestuous memories would’ve compelled him to obsess over cleanliness and genital ablutions. Eventually, his washings became ritualistic upon developing OCD, which was a result of his obsession to forget his indelible sordid past.

 

In truth, Muhammad was running scared. Being an individual born into poverty, and evolving into an overly dependent character, his newfound military authority would’ve acted as a double-edged sword. And the more powerful he became, the more fearful he was of losing the throne. As a simple incompetent peasant thrust into the pinnacle of political Arabia, undoubtedly the thrill would’ve worn off as the crushing reality of his ‘prophethood’ demanded that only he could decide the future of the Ummah. This confronting fact would’ve undoubtedly rattled his psyche, undoubtedly bolstering a life-long anxiety disorder. It’s obvious after reading the Hadith, that many times he was caught unawares and had to fabricate nonsensical superstitions and compulsions to counteract any threat to his crown.

 

Mirroring Muhammad’s own life, the aforementioned legendary oil tycoon Howard Hughes also faced a similar predicament. Inheriting enormous wealth and fear of losing his position of power, fame, and fortune, Hughes eventually fell into the same psychological trap. Though exempt from schizophrenia, the tycoon resorted to the same Muhammadan irrational hygienic rituals, compulsions, and repetitive verbal delivery. Sadly, not only her but everyone around him was affected.

 

Like the Islamic Ummah, Hughes’s exceptional vision for the future, his personal residence, his relationships, and his vast wealth and assets were invariably influenced by the intricacies of his compulsions. Muhammad, also being influenced by OCD, charted a compulsive war machine dedicated to obsessive taxation and tribute to his imaginary god, Allah. Like Hughes’ employees, Muslim disciples had to conform to their master’s irrational behavior and were commanded to live where he wanted them to live, and befriend whom he wanted them to befriend.

 

Today, Muslims will argue to the tooth that these alleged ‘divine’ revelations and his example is the truth, and should be performed to please god. However, the truth is that it’s irrefutable his conduct was indicative of OCD. We know this, as he never ‘revealed’ any divine explanations to justify his irrational behavior. Why should a man wipe his anus an odd number of times? Why should any person put his right shoe on first? Why can’t people drink while standing? To be frank, these exhortations are nonsensical!

 

Yet, Islamic theology is based around the concept that Muhammad was the ‘perfect human’, completely exempt from any mental disorders, anxieties, self-doubts, irrational thoughts, and psychological imperfections. However, his eccentricities showed no sign of intelligent order, no “method to his madness.” In reality, the man was another statistic in a widely documented behavioral disorder.

 

OCD is indicative of imperfection, as the brain struggles without the necessary serotonin levels. If Muhammad is considered to be the ‘perfect human’, then his evidential affliction with the condition destroys the claim. His mind was not perfect in the slightest, and in no way was he qualified to lead an already superstitious, ignorant flock who looked up to him for intelligent guidance. In truth, it was like the blind leading the blind.

 

Islam was facilitated through dogmatic compulsion, but ultimately became a punitive legislative society basing its ethos only on his obsessions. Sadly, those who refused to conform to his irrational behavior were invariably murdered for being ‘apostates’. Ironically, Muhammad’s callous act of burning down the houses of those who forgot to pray was highly uncharacteristic of OCD, and more symptomatic of dangerous narcissism.

 

However, the truth is that Muhammad was an irritating, pedantic, fussy, neurotic man trapped in a personal universe, plagued with indescribable obsessions. And although he relished being regarded as the center of the universe, he couldn’t handle being the odd one out. Consequentially, his followers were forced to mimic him to protect themselves, or to convince the world they weren’t worshipping a delusional, irrational compulsive individual; as the saying goes “if everyone is doing it, it must be right.”

 

Finally, the Quranic verse “there shall be no compulsion in religion” is a hypocritical statement regarding Muhammad’s true psychological nature. Muslims are compelled.

________________________

The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam

An Intro by John R. Houk

© December 3, 2019

_______________________

Muhammad’s Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions

 

Michael Lederman – Owner

12/2/19

MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth

 

Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West


I found a Raymond Ibrahim post on FrontPageMag.com that writes about the poisonous propaganda spewed by Left-Wing Multiculturalist and Islamic Apologists brainwashing susceptible Western minds for decades. You should read to discover if YOU are a victim or a collaborator of said brainwashing.

 

JRH 12/2/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West

How — and why — reality was turned upside down.

 

An Islamic Mosque

 

By Raymond Ibrahim

December 2, 2019

FrontPageMag.com

 

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

 

Any honest and objective appraisal of Islam’s historic jihad on the Christian world must be eye-opening, to say the very least.  In the first century of its existence (between 632-732) Islam permanently conquered, Arabized, and Islamized nearly three-quarters of the Christian world, thereby permanently severing it.  Europe came to be known as “the West” because it was literally the remaining and westernmost appendage of Christendom not to be swallowed up by Islam.

 

For roughly a millennium thereafter, Arabs, Berbers, Turks, and Tatars—all of whom called and saw themselves as Muslims—launched raid after raid, all justified and lauded as jihads, into virtually every corner of Europe.  They reached as far as Iceland and provoked the U.S. into its first war as a nation.  The devastation was indescribable; some regions in Europe, particularly in Spain and the Balkans, remain uninhabitable due to the incessant raiding.  Some 15 million Europeans were enslaved during this perennial jihad and, according to contemporary records, treated horrifically.

 

In short, “if we … ask ourselves how and when the modern notion of Europe and the European identity was born,” writes historian Franco Cardini, “we realize the extent to which Islam was a factor (albeit a negative one) in its creation.  Repeated Muslim aggression against Europe between the seventh to eighth centuries, then between the fourteenth and the eighteenth centuries … was a ‘violent midwife’ to Europe.”

 

Here the inevitable question arises: How could such a long, well-documented history of unmitigated Islamic aggression that had immense repercussions on the development of Western civilization now be presented as the antithesis of reality?

 

The answer revolves around a number of modern philosophies—from the Enlightenment to moral/cultural relativism—that have each contributed to an all-pervasive “Narrative” concerning the historic relationship between Islam and the West.  In presenting the West as aggressor and Islam as victim—hence the latter’s ongoing “grievance”-based animosity—this history is as entrenched as it is the reverse of reality.

 

To understand this, one must first understand that, despite its many manifestations, permutations, and emphases over the centuries, the Narrative’s unspoken driving force has largely been the same: to demonize and thus justify a break away from Europe’s traditional heritage, religion, identity, and mores.  If this sounds farfetched, consider: whereas by any objective standard the West is responsible for practically every boon taken for granted today—from scientific, technological, economic and medicinal advances, to the abolition of slavery and anti-discrimination laws—today no people of any race or civilization despise their heritage except Western people.    Clearly something is amiss.

 

Or consider how leftists/liberals/progressives who forever whine against any vestige of Western traditionalism, habitually make common cause with Islam—despite the latter’s truly oppressive qualities.  Thus feminists denounce the Western “patriarchy”—but say nothing against the Muslim treatment of women as chattel; homosexuals denounce Christian bakeries—but say nothing against the Muslim execution of homosexuals; multiculturalists denounce Christians who refuse to suppress their faith to accommodate the religious sensibilities of Muslim minorities—but say nothing against the entrenched and open Muslim persecution of Christians.

 

The reason for these discrepancies is simple:  “The enemy [Islam] of my enemy [Christianity] is my friend.”

 

From here, how and why such a formally well-known history of Muslim aggression against Europe was not merely suppressed but reversed should start making sense: of all non-European, non-Christian peoples, only Muslims lived alongside and interacted with (that is, constantly encroached and warred on) Europe for over a millennium; this made Muslims the only people—the only foil—that could be used to support the Narrative’s argument against premodern Europe.  But first an intellectually satisfying way of casting Muslims as victims not conquerors was needed.

 

Enter literary professor Edward Said’s 1978 book, Orientalism.  Its central thesis is that the Orientalists—the Europeans who began the academic study of the East centuries ago—were not writing objectively about Muslims and their history, but rather intentionally slandering and stereotyping them in order to justify dominating them during the colonial era.

 

This made perfect sense—but only because the postmodern Western mind had already been primed for it.  For if, as Marxist Materialism teaches, ideas/religions have no influence on history (and thus, economic want, not “jihad,” caused Muslims to expand); if, as Relativism and its spawn Multiculturalism teach, there are no absolute truths, religious or otherwise (and thus no culture or civilization is “better” than another); if, as pop psychology teaches, violent and negative behavior is always a product of societal injustices (and thus the more Muslims behave violently, the more that only proves they are frustrated victims)—then what does one make of the aforementioned centuries of European writings that uniformly depict Muslims as ideologically driven by violence and lust?

 

Simple: dismiss them all as bigoted and hypocritical lies by nefarious Europeans intent on demonizing a superior, more tolerant faith and civilization.   Thus a whole new academic approach to Islam—stripped of all historic writings not conforming to the Narrative—was born.  History would no longer shape ideas and attitudes; rather, preexisting ideas and attitudes—wishful thinking—would shape history.

 

Bernard Lewis, himself a target of Edward Said’s Orientalism, summarized this new approach—or “pseudo history”—well:

 

According to a currently fashionable epistemological view, absolute truth is either nonexistent or unattainable.  Therefore, truth doesn’t matter; facts don’t matter.  All discourse is a manifestation of a power relationship, and all knowledge is slanted.  Therefore, accuracy doesn’t matter; evidence doesn’t matter.  All that matters is the attitude—the motives and purposes—of the user of knowledge, and this may simply be claimed for oneself or imputed to another.  In imputing motives, the irrelevance of truth, facts, evidence, and even plausibility is a great help.  The mere assertion suffices” (Islam and the West, 115).

 

Orientalism’s success lay less in anything intrinsic to it—American classicist Bruce Thornton characterizes it as an “incoherent amalgam of dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”—and more because it fit the West’s prevailing zeitgeist (which, of course, thrives on “dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”).

 

Nor does the Narrative predominate today because people are well read or pay attention to academe; as French historian Marc Ferro demonstrated in his Cinema and History (1988), the overwhelming majority of Western people’s knowledge of history comes from movies.  And almost any major film dealing with premodern Europeans and Muslims—Robin Hood (1991), Kingdom of Heaven (2005), etc.—contrasts hypocritical, intolerant, and fanatical Christians with sophisticated, advanced, and tolerant Muslims.   Commenting on such films back in 1997, Lewis wrote, “The misrepresentation of the past in the cinema is probably the most fertile and effective source of such misinformation at the present time…”

 

Twenty years later the Narrative has only metastasized and infected all aspects of public life, including politics and so-called “mainstream news.”   Meanwhile, social and other media giants—YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter—increasingly censor material that contradicts the Narrative.

 

Such is how a previously well-known history was turned upside down and used to weaken the West—the greatest sin of which is ever again to think or behave like its “awful” ancestors did concerning Islam.

 

For more on the true history between Islam and the West, see the author’s recent Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

© Copyright 2019, FrontPageMag.com

 

Donate to Front Page Magazine

 

ABOUT FPM

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four  Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining the chief groups and individuals of the Left and their organizational interlocks.  It is a full service encyclopedia of the READ THE REST

 

Donate to Front Page Magazine

 

Our Republic Is In Crisis


If you have ever read any of my blog posts you are fully aware that members of the Political Party known as the Dems are ardent liars. With that in mind you can only imagine the inner fury that arises when I hear a Dem proclaim “we must protect the Constitution” or “No President is above the law” and so on. I particularly find it galling when I’ve heard Nancy Pelosi – Speaker by the incredulous virtue of being the leader of the Majority Party in the House – quote Benjamin Franklin as he departed the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia:

 

The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

 

This exchange was recorded by Constitution signer James McHenry in a diary entry that was later reproduced in the 1906 American Historical Review. Yet in more recent years, Franklin has occasionally [sic] been misquoted as having said, “A democracy, if you can keep it.” A Republic, if You Can Keep It; By John F. McManus; TheNewAmerican.com; 11/6/2000

 

I’ve heard Pelosi quote Franklin on preserving our Republic by impeaching President Trump. The gall coming from a leader from what is now one of the most corrupt Political Parties in American history whose leadership has spent decades diluting, arbitrarily rewriting through unelected Courts and in many cases just criminally ignore the United States Constitution.

 

There are rumors that IG Michael Horowitz’s report on “DOJ and FBI’s conduct during the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant process as it relates to the 2016 presidential election” is going to scapegoat the unimportant and ignore the big fish Dem criminals – AS USUAL. If that is so, America has lost her Republic to the tyranny of the Deep State unelected bureaucracy. Justin Smith takes a look at the rumors!

 

JRH 11/27/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

*************************

Our Republic Is In Crisis

America’s Traitors Must Not Go Unpunished

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 11/25/2019 9:29 PM

 

The United States Republic has been under a sustained assault since 2016, by a Democratic Party, that has used every mechanism and maneuver possible to undermine President Trump’s Administration; and it now self-describes itself as “the Resistance”, an incendiary title most usually ascribed to insurgents fighting an occupying military power and not a “Loyal Opposition”. Their worldview is so far removed from America’s Founding, so antithetical, that they now stand as the Enemy from Within, as they engage in a war to cripple a duly elected government by any means necessary, and this cannot be allowed, if this nation is to continue as a true Republic.

 

Time and time again, the Democratic Party has exhibited it is willing to use any means necessary to gain a momentary advantage to achieve their agenda and goals, no matter the systemic implications and the unintended or intended collateral consequences. They do not care if their actions can be justified as a general rule of conduct, equally applicable to all of America, since they believe they are the most brilliant animals in the room and seek to impose their will, despite any protestations.

 

Our governing system is in crisis, and our Republic is indeed in crisis. Both are in crisis due to the Democratic Party’s belief that their actions to ignore, subvert and replace norms, institutions and laws are somehow authorized simply by their will, edict and proclamation, and their follower’s acceptance of this abrogation of the Constitution compounds and exacerbates the situation, creating dangerous times for all America.

 

Immediately upon Trump’s election, Rosa Brooks, Defense Department official under Obama, outlined ways to remove Trump from office, before the 2020 elections, in an article for Foreign Policy. In seditious and treasonous style, she brazenly advocated for a military coup.

 

In recently discovered tweets, Mark Zaid, attorney for the traitorous Ukraine Gossip Leaker, boasts of the coup in January 2017, typing the words: “#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow. … As one falls, two more will take their place.”

 

And, in a recent New York Times op-ed, retired Admiral William McRaven essentially called for President Trump’s ouster, as he suggested “the sooner, the better.”

 

Traitors within the Obama administration’s CIA, FBI, DOJ and State Department, along with federal bureaucratic holdovers, had to be acting at the direction of Obama himself, when all is said and done, in this coup to overthrow President Trump, and the mainstream media was culpable all along the way, doubling, tripling and quadrupling down on the dishonest narrative. They are all now desperate to evade their responsibility for this, as they still advance the false premise that Russia hacked the 2016 election to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. And as all the traitors are being exposed, one by one, they are willing to bring down the country rather than face the consequences of their sedition and treason.

 

[Blog Editor: A minuscule list of articles pointing to Obama Administration traitors you WILL NOT see from the MSM:

 

 

 

 

 

Reported by Fox News, John McLaughlin, former acting CIA Director, recently publicly exclaimed, “Thank God for the Deep State.” He was soon joined by John Brennan, former CIA Director, who added his agreement in praise for the “Deep State people” and their opposition to President Trump.

 

How are the American people supposed to maintain this nation, when nearly half of them support the anti-American, anti-Constitution and rule of law actions and policies of the Democratic Party? How does this not end badly for America?

 

The Democratic Party communists are hellbent on impeachment and the absence of wrongdoing and any real case doesn’t enter their illogical thought process. They do not care that they are further seeding the destruction of America and will reap the whirlwind to follow.

 

After President Obama’s hot microphone moment with Russian President Medvedev was excused and the media was essentially silent on it, the Democrats really are throwing bricks in a glass house, especially in light of former Vice-President Biden’s actual quid pro quo, regarding withholding aid to Ukraine until an honest Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden was fired. Can anyone really honestly state that President Trump has committed one single misdemeanor or high crime, in this entire miserable mess?

 

And now all America is being forced to endure the nauseating spectacle of the bug-eyed mentally ill Representative Adam Schiff chairing the “impeachment inquiry”, and acting bizarrely and near deranged, in the House Intelligence Committee, where Schiff has regularly abused his power and shredded the constitutional norms. Schiff has continuously, consistently and maliciously blocked every attempted defense of the nakedly absurd charges against President Trump, through chicane and deceitful means that are void of any concept of due process, concocted by Schiff and his communist lawfare confidence men and grifters — no right to argue against those set of Stalinist rules and this ensuing “show trial”, no right to call witnesses and no right to cross-examine “witnesses”, those purveyors of hearsay.

 

[Blog Editor: Examples of Shifty Schiff chicanery:

 

 

 

 

Speaker Pelosi has refused to initiate a formal impeachment trial, since that would trigger a legal process that would remove the Democrat’s current tyrannical hold over the process. Instead, she has opted to acquiesce to the current melodramatic fishing expedition, one more quixotic chapter in the ignominious crusade to reverse the 2016 election.

 

In the meantime, the gas-lighting of America by the media also continues, in stories like the November NYT’s ‘Russia Inquiry Review Is Said to Criticize F.B.I. but Rebuff Claims of Biased Acts’. This is simply an attempt to convince America that the entire FBI abuse of the FISA warrant process and multiple lies presented to the FISA Court all rests on the shoulders of one lone, lowly miserable chump of a lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, who manipulated and doctored one email, and its truthless assertions are meant to exonerate both the CIA and the FBI for opening the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation on false evidence they furnished to the FISA judges.

 

[Blog Editor: Indeed there is the appearance Clinesmith may be the scapegoat offering instead of including Dem-supporting criminals in the FBI and CIA:

 

 

 

More eerie blue gas-light dances throughout CBS and its 60 Minutes reality optional story on the supposed Russian hacking of our election, in a blatant attempt to deflect from the fact that Crowdstrike, owned by Ukrainian oligarch Dmitri Alperovitch, [Blog Editor: Actually Alperovitch was born in Russia BUT he is heavily connected to Ukrainian oligarch/billionaire  Victor Pinchuk who funds the Atlantic Council of which Alperovitch and infamous Chalupa sisters (Alexandra & Andrea) connected to Steele Dossier conspiracy are also members – TALK ABOUT SOLICITING FOREIGN MEDDLING IN A U.S. ELECTION!] created the story initially, and Crowdstrike had been hired by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton to interfere in the 2016 election. After the fact, Crowdstrike also became the sole entity allowed to perform a forensic examination on the DNC’s servers, while persuading the FBI to turn a blind-eye; in other words, the DNC’s contractor investigated its own criminal behavior. Doesn’t any patriotic American want that investigated?

 

[Blog Editor: The Mueller Report (or whoever the true author is?) claims the Russians hacked DNC servers solely based on Crowdstrike assertions rather than FBI/CIA forensic examinations:

 

FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report; By Katie Bo Williams; The Hill; 1/4/17 7:29 PM EST

 

The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.

 

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

 

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers.

 

Instead, the official said, the bureau and other agencies have relied on analysis done by the third-party security firm CrowdStrike, which investigated the breach for the DNC. … MORE TO READ

 

CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims; By Aaron Maté; Real Clear Investigations; 7/5/19

 

At a May press conference capping his tenure as special counsel, Robert Mueller emphasized what he called “the central allegation” of the two-year Russia probe. The Russian government, Mueller sternly declared, engaged in “multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election, and that allegation deserves the attention of every American.” Mueller’s comments echoed a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) asserting with “high confidence” that Russia conducted a sweeping 2016 election influence campaign. …

 

… The report claims that the interference operation occurred “principally” on two fronts: Russian military intelligence officers hacked and leaked embarrassing Democratic Party documents, and a government-linked troll farm orchestrated a sophisticated and far-reaching social media campaign that denigrated Hillary Clinton and promoted Trump.

 

But a close examination of the report shows that none of those headline assertions are supported by the report’s evidence or other publicly available sources. They are further undercut by investigative shortcomings and the conflicts of interest of key players involved: 

 

  • The report uses qualified and vague language to describe key events, indicating that Mueller and his investigators do not actually know for certain whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to WikiLeaks.

 

  • The report’s timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.

 

  • There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.

 

  • Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.

 

  • S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.

 

  • Further, the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party’s legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.

 

  • Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out the social media campaign. Instead it blames, as Mueller said in his closing remarks, “a private Russian entity” known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA).

 

  • Mueller also falls far short of proving that the Russian social campaign was sophisticated, or even more than minimally related to the 2016 election. As with the collusion and Russian hacking allegations, Democratic officials had a central and overlooked hand in generating the alarm about Russian social media activity.

 

 

The Democrats are waging a heated attack ahead of the post-Thanksgiving deluge of bad news they anticipate to be forthcoming in Horowitz’s report. Many criminal cronies whose turpitude and crimes have been richly and publicly fully documented for many months may soon be called to an accounting on detailed charges, and at the very least, those facing criminal indictments should and must eventually include the following, if any true justice still exists in America; charge, arrest, prosecute and imprison: Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Page, McCabe, Rosenstein. And if real justice is to be had, any sweep must capture Bill Priestap, Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, John Carlin, Michael Gaeta, and most certainly even Barack Obama, the Democratic Party Prince of Darkness, just in time for Christmas, too. And a bit of added reward would see Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann included for their mendacious, malicious prosecution, when they knew for two full years they had no case. [Bold text Blog Editor’s]

 

Dem Party Prince of Darkness (acquired without permission from Bosch Fawstin)

 

Let all freedom loving patriotic Americans pray and work to ensure that any action countering this coup finally includes a nationwide drag-net that sweeps up all involved in the latest UkraineGate subterfuge, such as the faux “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella, those complicit agents from Rep. Adam Schiff’s office, and accomplice Michael Atkinson — the current Intelligence Community Inspector General who has a major conflict of interest as the former legal counsel to Assistant Attorney John Carlin, who headed the National Security Division of the Justice Department at the start of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” stratagem; of equal note, Atkinson was also previously Robert Mueller’s chief of staff at the FBI. And let’s not forget that Ciaramella was a CIA spy serving in the White House, who then promptly engaged in the height of sedition and lawlessness by actually spying on the President of the United States and his staff.

 

[Blog Editor: Noteworthy info on Deep State IG Michael Atkinson:

 

IG Actively Aid the “Whistleblower” in His Impeachment Quest; By streiff; RedState.com; 9/28/19 1:00 pm

 

 

But if a shocking story reported by Sean Davis yesterday is true, then not only were we wrong but the implications are that the Intelligence Community, itself, and in particular the Intelligence Community IG decided to assist in the effort create a narrative that would justify the impeachment of a lawfully elected president who was acting lawfully.

 

… the IC changed the rules for classifying disgruntled personnel as whistleblowers in a very significant way:

 

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

 

 

 

To review the bidding. Someone in the Intelligence Committee leadership changed the definition of whistleblower so this whistleblower was elevated from a rumor monger to a protected individual. They did this about the same time as the complaint was filed. Because the IC IG is intimately involved in the whistleblower regulations (I’d be willing to guess that office is the proponent of the regulation but I don’t know that for a fact) Atkinson knew about the change. … READ ENTIRTY

 

Activity and Background of Sketchy IC IG Michael Atkinson Now Under Investigative Spotlight…; By sundance; The Last Refuge – TheConservativeTreeHouse.com; 10/7/19

 

Last week the Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson, testified behind closed doors to congress. Atkinson testified about his role in bringing the ‘whistle-blower’ complaint forward.  The details of that testimony are now starting to surface and thankfully congress is taking a closer look at the sketchy background of Michael Atkinson.

 

 

On Sunday, October 6th, Ranking Member Devin Nunes also discussed his concerns with the testimony of Michael Atkinson.  Nunes noted the testimony “was a joke”.

 

 

“So he’s either incompetent or in on it, and he’s going to have more to answer for, I can promise you, because we are not going to let him go; he is going to tell the truth about what happened,” Nunes added.  (read more)

 

 

Given the nature of Atkinson’s background, it appears his prior work in 2016, during his tenure as the lead legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, likely played a role in his decision.

 

Here’s Nunes Sunday Interview (audio):

 

 

The center of the 2016 Lawfare Alliance election influence was/is the Department of Justice National Security Division, DOJ-NSD. It was the DOJ-NSD running the Main Justice side of the 2016 operations to support Operation Crossfire Hurricane and FBI agent Peter Strzok. It was also the DOJ-NSD where the sketchy legal theories around FARA violations (Sec. 901) originated.

 

Michael K Atkinson was previously the Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ-NSD) in 2016. That makes Atkinson senior legal counsel to John Carlin and Mary McCord who were the former heads of the DOJ-NSD in 2016 when the stop Trump operation was underway.

 

Michael Atkinson was the lawyer for the same DOJ-NSD players who: (1) lied to the FISA court (Judge Rosemary Collyer) about the 80% non compliant NSA database abuse using FBI contractors; (2) filed the FISA application against Carter Page; and (3) used FARA violations as tools for political surveillance and political targeting.

 

Yes, that means Michael Atkinson was Senior Counsel for the DOJ-NSD, at the very epicenter of the political weaponization and FISA abuse.

 

If the DOJ-NSD exploitation of the NSA database, and/or DOJ-NSD FISA abuse, and/or DOJ-NSD FARA corruption were ever to reach sunlight, current ICIG Atkinson -as the lawyer for the process- would be under a lot of scrutiny for his involvement.

 

Yes, that gives current ICIG Michael Atkinson a strong and corrupt motive to participate with the Pelosi-Schiff/Lawfare impeachment objective.  Sketchy!

 

READ ENTIRETY

 

These traitors must not go unpunished, and if there is any truth to the report that Inspector General Horowitz has essentially given cover to several of the coup plotters, including James Comey, this portends of more dark days ahead and more evil machinations yet to come.

 

Over half of America has been awaiting the moment authorities, acting in accordance with the actual rule of law, put an end to this convoluted, terrible campaign of seditious fog that is driving our country close to the brink of a second civil war. The half of our countrymen who have digested and analyzed the evidence of this treason and sedition, underwritten by Hillary Clinton and her allies, on the back-channels of the information highway understand that millions of other credulous Americans who accepted the CIA narrative are in for a massive surprise once they discover how deeply all America has been betrayed.

 

I know without any doubt that much of the Republic’s future rests on the final determination of the Inspector General’s Report and any successful action towards rounding up and prosecuting all the anti-American TRAITORS involved in this entire sorry mess. When and if America witnesses this egregious part of Her history made right by the prosecution and imprisonment of these traitors, only then will myself and millions of other fine Americans look more hopefully on what the future may hold for America. If these traitors escape true justice, whether one wishes to acknowledge the fact, the republic is essentially done and over, and anything goes moving forward, since that will, in fact, be the attitude taken from any such point on by both parties.

 

In an age of traitors justifying their sedition and treason as a normal path of resistance to a President, whose only crime is being hated by the communist Democrats, it is not any exaggeration to state that many of those involved in this ongoing assault against the President and the Republic should have to answer charges up to and including treason. Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham must find the strength to force the ignoble cast of characters to feast at the table of the consequences of their own actions, and other loyal Americans in pertinent departments must anticipate and stand ready to preempt any attempt by these desperate traitors and their respective agencies to enlist the military brass in an outright overthrow of the executive, since intimations of this are already circulating. In these upside-down times, when the misguided, the ignorant and the Evil redefine patriotism as removing the President before a constitutionally mandated election, any such move will result in civil violence unseen since the mid-Nineteenth century: The Deep State and the Democratic party have worn out their welcome and their legitimacy.

 

By Justin O. Smith

++++++++++++++++++

Sources I considered using but did not but YOU might find useful (unless you are a Dem Traitor to the Founders’ U.S. Republic):

 

Politicians and their Families are Playing in the Corrupt Ukrainian Sandbox; By Kelleigh Nelson; DrRichSwier.com; 10/12/19

 

What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google; By Tyler Durden; ZeroHedge; 3/24/2017 – 19:00

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets and all source links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to Southwest’s ‘ECO-TERRORISM’


Edited by John R. Houk

Content from Southwest

Intro © November 26, 2019

 

There is often a thin line between Conspiracy Fact and Conspiracy Theory. It is often difficult which side of the fact and conjecture falls when it comes to national governments. WHY? The truth of the matter is Machiavellian secrets is how governments operate to proceed with perceived National Interests. I use the word “perceived” because perception is always in the hands of those in power.

 

In representative governments (face it – the last direct Democracy was ancient Athens which is where America’s Founders came to understand the concept of the Tyranny of the Majority) that power develops by elected governments often with power structures operated by an unelected bureaucracy whose loyalties can be mysterious and not necessarily to the benefit of the common good of those who elect government officials on a local or national (in the USA – Federal) level.

 

It is the bureaucratic level that secret agendas proceed that I believe someone with power has good intentions according to their political ideology, BUT can nefarious results that the people who vote would not view with favor – no matter the voting-people’s political ideology.

 

It is my sense that is what pseudonymous Southwest is trying to decipher from available facts below. Unfortunately the process of deciphering leads to one’s best guess. A guess one would call a Conspiracy Theory of conjecture while another would view the preponderance of facts that leads to a logical outcome.

 

On my part I have a sense theories could quite possibly collide with logical outcomes.

 

Southwest put together a series of posts on the USA.Life social platform he divided between A – D on what he views as Eco-Terrorism perpetrated by governments with a close look at the U.S. government. I think you will be fascinated with his point of view which looks at Climate control but NOT through the lens of Climate Change political Leftists. I’ll let you consider who is culpable on the Left and/or the Right for potential human manufactured natural disasters resulting from mysterious bureaucratic agendas. A good guess there is some culpability from both the Left and the Right.

 

The question then arises: Will voters ever be able to restrain unelected bureaucrats in both civilian government and military-industrial complex?

 

JRH 11/26/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**************************

ECO-TERRORISM:
NATURAL DISASTERS- HOW NATURAL ARE THEY?

 

By Southwest on USA.Life

Shared 11/24/19

 

This is a subject dear to most of us: the lives that are being lost due to hurricanes that had been created and/or energized by the Department of Defense and H.A.A.R.P. [Blog Editor: the acronym to High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (Wikipedia) – (GlobalResearch.ca)] through Ionospheric Heaters, needles, radio waves etc. [Blog Editor: In the links provided above you should note that official military management of H.A.A.R.P. ended in 2014, BUT the program continues under the management of the University of Alaska (Fairbanks). As in military management days, Conspiracy Theorists aren’t buying UAF management disclaimers that no nefarious military experiments are occurring. Whether you buy into the conspiracies partially, wholly or not at all; one thing that should pique your attention that H.A.A.R.P. in the past did receive military research & development funding from D.A.R.P.A. the folks that are exempt from any public disclosures due to the utmost Classified protections.]

The U.S. Army, Navy, Weather Bureau, and General Electric scientists seeded the first tropical storm on October 13, 1947 [ZeroHedge 10/10/2017 – 21:50] with 180 pounds of dry ice dropped by aircraft and the Cape Sable hurricane formed. PROJECT CIRRUS [The Black Vault (3/26/15) & History of Project Cirrus – 122 pg PDF from GE Research Laboratory (7-1952)] WAS THE FIRST hurricane Cloud Seeding experiment project. Successful.

Space-Weather Modification technology has advanced to the point where our own environment is now being used as a weapon, and the stakes could not be any higher. The history of weather modification used as a weapon is now exposed in the following series of scientific articles, Space Weather Modification timeline and a map of currently operational Ionospheric Heaters [HAARP and the Sky Heaters; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; originally published 8/21/12 – Updated 11/14/18 AND Christopher Fontenot: Ionospheric Heaters, Waves from Alfven to ELF; By Crazz Files author- Adam; The Crazz Files; 12/19/16]. It started with Operation Popeye: Weather warfare on Vietnam March 20, 1967 to July 5 1972 [Youtube VIDEO (2:47): Operation Popeye – Weather Warfare in Vietnam (9/21/11) AND The Secret Weather Manipulation Program of the Vietnam War; By Matt Novak; PaleoFuthure.Gizmodo.com; 3/5/15 4:50 PM AND 274. Memorandum From the Deputy Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs (Kohler) to Secretary of State Rusk (Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXVIII, Laos); History.State.gov; 1/13/1967].

When upper atmospheric nuclear explosions were banned back in the 1950’s, the U.S. military, still hell bent on replacing our fickle ionosphere with something more reliable, decided to dump millions of needles in space [Youtube VIDEO (16:51 with a few ads): That Time the U.S. Military Launched a Half a Billion Needles to Space for Reasons… (11/3/19) AND The Forgotten Cold War Plan That Put a Ring of Copper Around the Earth; By Joe Hanson; Wired; 8/13/13 9:30 am AND Space needles (PDF); MIT – Lincoln Laboratory; 5/2018].

To this day millions of needles can be found floating in space or buried in ice at our poles. Next, the military began using sounding rockets and satellites to dump [Aluminum, Barium, and Chemtrails Explained – JUST THE FACTS; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; Published 3/15/15 – “Uploaded:” 6/9/18 (search-scroll to “dumped in space to study”) AND  Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed; Posted by Gordon; TapNewsWire.com; 7/29/17 8:28 am (search-scroll to “create heavy ion clouds in space by dumping”) AND Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project; By Peter A. Kirby; Activist Post; 2/17/15] Barium, Strontium, and Sulfur Hexafluoride into our ionosphere.

 

Military radio technicians could heat these chemical released in space with the ionospheric heater at Arecibo, Puerto Rico and “see” our ionosphere. Today, the top ionospheric heater worldwide HAARP fires electromagnetic missiles into our Van Allen belts and scrapes out radiation using the “Christofilos Effect” [Interesting explanation via Youtube VIDEO (6:38): What is CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT? What does CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT mean? CHRISTOFILOS EFFECT meaning (1/27/17)] learned back in the 1950’s nuclear blasts (which refers to trapping energy).

Dubbed “radiation belt remediation” ionospheric heaters are sold to politicians and to the public as a backup plan for Solar Flares or High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse attacks, however foreign governments are very concerned about the military capabilities of these ionospheric heaters, with the Russian government going as far as to say HAARP could “have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions.” [RUSSIA, CHINA, AND THOSE IONOSPHERIC HEATERS AND OTHER STUFF: PART ONE and PART TWO; By Joseph P. Farrell; Giza Death Star; 12/20/18]

The U.S. continues to carry out large-scale scientific experiments under the HAARP program, and not controlled by the global community. Those weapons are capable of breaking radio communication lines and equipment installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious accidents in electricity networks and in oil and gas pipelines and have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions, the deputies said. They demanded that an international ban be put on such large-scale geophysical experiments. The appeal, signed by 90 deputies, has been sent to President Vladimir Putin, to the United Nations and other international organizations, to the parliaments and leaders of the UN member countries, to the scientific public and to mass media outlets. [Blog Editor: In full disclosure as an American Patriot I am suspicious of anything ran by the globalists of the UN, EU or Putin’s Russia.]

Despite these dire warnings, the practice of heating chemical releases in space is just “a conspiracy theory.”

To make it short, the Defense Department is selling the benefits of those attacks without telling that they are being used to create and/or to maximize the power of earthquakes, Tsunamis and more.

This eco-terrorism is a direct cause of the magnitude of present earthquakes, volcanos, mental disorders and suicide, to name a few of the consequences of this attack, but it is not done randomly, at least not at this moment.

Weather is unnaturally severe because of unnatural modification.

 

[Blog Editor: The above source links are by this Blog Editor. Southwest provides his own source link contributions below which I will distinguish from any additions of my own.]

 

Many believe that Agenda 21 is the goal and to place the remaining population in FEMA camps under the control of the UN [Blog Editor: A scenario I found referencing Agenda 21, FEMA Camps and Depopulation: Agenda 21- Codex- Fema Camps 80% Depopulation = New World Order (video); By Medeea Greere; AMG-News.com; 11/5/19 – You judge]. Whatever the goal may be, there’s no justification to create tornados and earthquakes [Blog Editor: Southwest link on creating tornadoes and earthquakes – HAARP and the Sky Heaters; By James Franklin Lee Jr.; ClimateViewer.com; Published 8/21/12 – Updated 11/14/18].

“The list of unintended consequences of human manipulation of natural systems is long: concrete jungles creating urban heat islands, vast oceanic dead zones resulting from fertilizer use on inland agricultural fields, and intentionally introduced species, such as the cane toad in Australia, that then wreak havoc on ecosystems, among others. Whether the idea is to mimic a volcano’s cooling impact on climate by continuously pumping sulfates into the stratosphere or to brighten clouds via crewless ships spewing water vapor, possible problems range from shutting down rainfall in certain regions to unilateral declarations of war.” [Southwest quoting – What Is Geoengineering and Why Is It Considered a Climate Change Solution? By David Biello; Scientific American; 4/6/10]

 

As clearly stated, human manipulation of weather is unjust, unnatural, and just wrong! Could this be a way for government to subdue a population? It is unbearable to think about, yet proven by evidence that major hurricanes such as Katrina were caused by weather modification.

 

[Blog Editor: Southwest messaged the link http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=81991 on 11/25 as a part of his weather manipulation inquiry. Below is an excerpt:]

 

Hurricane Harvey: A Geoengineered Superstorm Targets Texas—WHY?

Why Southeast Texas? Why now?

 

Hurricane Harvey weather map

Notice how Harvey was aiming right for the capital city of Austin.

 

By SOTN

August 27, 2017

State of the Nation

 

Like all geoengineered storms fabricated by the NWO globalist cabal, Hurricane Harvey was fastidiously manufactured and directed at Texas.  The following video breaks it all down: Hurricane Harvey Targeting Texas (Video)

 

Because this meteorological fact is now self-evident, the most important question that can be asked (and answered) is “Why has the great state of Texas been targeted yet again?” The analysis that follows explains the real purpose(s) behind Hurricane Harvey.

 

[SOTN] Editor’s Note: The link below provides a detailed exposé that was previously published by SOTN about the weather wars waged against Texas in the past.  This post contains vital background material which informs the present predicament.

 

TEXAS FLOODS: A Geoengineered Weather Event Using Chemtrails And HAARP

 

Another Texas Deluge

 

First, it’s important to note that this superstorm is still very much in progress.  Some of the best weather forecast models have predicted up to 40 inches of rain in the most affected areas over the coming days.

 

As is often the case, this hurricane is not just about a calamitous wind-damaging event as much as it was geoengineered to be a mega rain-dumper.  Catastrophic winds typically limit their fury mainly to the coastlines, although they can cut a swath of great destruction that follows the path of the eye wall.

 

Continuously falling rains, on the other hand, can cause an apocalyptic deluge that paralyzes major metro areas like Corpus Christi and Houston.  These slow-motion rain events and subsequent flooding always prove to be the worst of the one-two punch packed by many hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.

 

Hurricane Harvey: Fears of flash floods as 40 inches of rain hit Texas – latest updates

 

When the damage caused by Hurricane Harvey is finally assessed, it will likely prove to be one of the worst manmade disasters in Texas history.  Therefore, it behooves investigators to ascertain why the geoengineers were ordered to target Texas with such a cataclysmic storm.

 

READ THE REST

 

This page does a good job of Illustrating multiple United States patents involving weather modification projects. Also on this page is the “hurricane modification workshop”, a textbook of information on how to create, enhance, and modify weather systems.

 

The following is a page from
https://climateviewer.com/2013/11/08/hurricane-hacking-the-department-of-homeland-security-enters-the-weather-modification-business/

 

Hurricane Hacking: The Department of Homeland Security enters the weather modification business

DHS working on steering hurricanes with Bill Gates and top geoengineering scientists.

 

By James Franklin Lee Jr.

Published · Friday, Nov 8, 2013

ClimateViewer.com

 

nasa-grip-genesis-and-rapid-intensification-processes – DHS logo

 

Did you know? The good ol’ boys at the DHS are working on steering hurricanes and some big names in the Geoengineering world are getting in on the mix. Check out the following timeline to see how it all went down, then read the DHS report on the hurricane hacking workshop.

 

Timeline

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Patent App-20090177569 Storm Protection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIDEO: DHS Hurricane Modification Workshop, Weather Modification Association Conference 2008

 

 

[Posted by Jim Lee

20.1K subscribers

Reference Documents: https://climateviewer.com/2013/11/08/hurricane-hacking-the-department-of-homeland-security-enters-the-weather-modification-business/

The Department of Homeland Security asked NOAA/ESRL in Boulder to organize a workshop on possible new scientific theory and approaches to hurricane modification in February, 2008. Nearly two dozen scientists from around the world attended and there were a number of hypotheses and new ideas presented. We shall summarize the workshop results here and the development of the new DHS-funded HAMP Program that arose from the Workshop. https://ams.confex.com/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_168336.htm

MORE TO READ]

 

I now present the DHS workshop report (videos and a few images added by Jim Lee): READ THE REST

+++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_____________________________

Intro to Southwest’s ‘ECO-TERRORISM’

Edited by John R. Houk

Content from Southwest

Intro © November 26, 2019

________________________

ECO-TERRORISM:
NATURAL DISASTERS- HOW NATURAL ARE THEY?

 

© Southwest

 

Edited by John R. Houk

All text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor. Most source links are by the Editor except where indicated by Southwest.