AOC’s Marshall Plan for America


Justin Smith examines the disaster that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Dems would foist on America through the Communistic Green New Deal (GND).

 

JRH 2/16/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

***********************

AOC’s Marshall Plan for America

America’s Wild-Eyed Communists

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent Originally 2/13/19 8:39 PM

Update sent: 2/15/2019 6:44 PM

 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s radical “Green New Deal” legislation proposal [Blog Editor: Farting cows in original version mysteriously disappears in final version], presented to America on February 7th, is an outright Marxist socialist and a virtual communist attempt to supplant our Republic system and our capitalist economy, in a manner that can only result in the destruction of both. Offering an extraordinary, unprecedented level of government intrusion, a “massive government intervention” in her words, AOC’s plan isn’t simply going to transform our lives, rather it will smash our way of life, through a mass de-population scheme, that Americans ignore at our own peril.

 

Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal sensationalizes and magnifies the imagined impending doom from climate change, and yet, the plan actually addresses very few solutions for anything climate related. Instead, the plan has latched on to climate change, in utopian fashion, and a ruse that offers everything under the sun as a new right, from ice-cream for everyone to a right to get a government purchased pony, or so it does seem. She and her ilk have opportunistically seized upon the issue to justify seizing the United States economy and implementing full-blown socialism and the most Left-wing agenda in American history.

 

Branding the plan as a kind of “Marshall Plan” and lifting a page from Bill McKibben’s 2016 article in ‘The New Republic’, one finds free Medicare — may as well call it “Medicaid” for all — free education, high-speed rails to replace air travel, a federal jobs guarantee, codified family leave, a national union, income paid to those unwilling to work and rebuilding every structure in the nation to meet new environmental regulations. The plan closely follows the failed socialist “Leap Manifesto” advocated by Canada’s Leftists, anti-capitalists, and eco-socialists, such as Naomi Klein, who once wrote “shredding the free-market ideology that has dominated the global economy for more than three decades” was the only way to combat climate change.

 

At the heart of the New Communists’ plan is a focus on renewable energy and the notion that they can move the nation completely away from the use of fossil fuel over the next decade. Electricity would triple in cost, and gasoline could easily rise to $6 per gallon, or more, just to reach fifty percent renewable energy, according to many independent studies including the Heritage Foundation. If actually implemented, their plan will economically cripple the United States, even if it was gradually implemented over the next thirty years.

 

What happens to the former workers in the fossil fuel industry? Will wind-farming be able to absorb their numbers in a cost efficient manner? AOC’s plan does call for a “fair and just transition for all communities and workers.” Ha! I can barely contain my excitement, as I hear this coming from the same party that gave us the failed Obamacare.

 

As noted by Robert Bryce, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute: “FDR, Sam Rayburn and others who pushed for rural electrification back in the 1930s did so because they wanted lower-cost electricity for rural customers. The (Green New Deal) will result in massive increases in energy costs for consumers across the country. It will require covering vast swaths of rural America with wind turbines and transmission lines at the very time that states from Maine to California are rejecting those same projects.”

 

It is not hard to imagine that many households will be hard-pressed to choose between freezing in the winter, buying groceries or paying their mortgages. America will see a sharp rise in homelessness, if such a plan is ever passed, especially considering homelessness has risen steadily, since 1980, and its numbers are now higher than during the Great Depression.

 

Will government be able to prevent them from starving to death by opening “soup kitchens”?

 

Thank God there isn’t enough support in the Senate to pass this fantasy legislation, mimicking Mao’s catastrophic Great Leap Forward, that is advocated by the nation’s red, radical Democrats, at the moment. Such will not always be the case unless we can stop the trend that exhibits 51 percent of Americans age 18 to 29 now view socialism and even communism favorably, with 60 percent of Democrats holding these radical beliefs.

 

Once thought to be a fringe policy idea, AOC’s plan has given climate change legislation significant momentum in recent months. At least 40 members of the House have stated they support the Green New Deal, and every Democratic presidential candidate supports most or all of the plan, from Senators Cory Booker (NJ) to Kamala Harris (CA) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass) to Representative Tulsi Gabbard [Daily Caller & The Hill] (HA).  And potential Democratic candidate, Bernie Sanders (VT) has also thrown his support behind it.

 

I wonder how much Tulsi is going to love her train ride to Hawaii?

 

This sort of transition would essentially nationalize the economy and force the abandonment of huge swaths of capital, which could not be redirected anywhere else; however, every resource, nearly all labor and all production would be diverted from its current use to an agenda determined by government planners and overlords. Much of America would be impoverished overnight, if any such plan ever becomes “law”, and that’s no exaggeration.

 

These wild-eyed communists suggest that throwing money at these projects will ensure their success, but most of America will not easily fall in line to pay the $6.6 trillion annual price-tag, that is three times the amount the federal government collects in tax revenues and thirty-four percent of the U.S.’s entire Gross Domestic Product. It will more than likely require deadly force to redirect such a massive amount of the nation’s wealth, if, Heaven forbid, the Democrat’s ever gain so much power.

 

The New Green Communists’ are unwilling to be truthful about their resolution. Current technologies and opportunity costs would be overwhelmed by this proposal, resulting in a systemic collapse and mass shortages and a scarcity of food. It may read like it offers a wonderful world for all, by emulating Venezuela’s Constitution and enshrining all sorts of “rights”, but it essentially shreds the U.S. Constitution and impedes and suppresses individual liberty, and it reduces each American to “equality” in the lowest common denominator in extreme poverty. It is a miserable proposal that will result in millions of Americans being murdered or starved to death, in order to ensure its success and perpetual power for its Democratic Party creators, under a totalitarian socialist state.

 

And any American Patriot should be prepared to fight any such plan from ever becoming “law” to his death — for any way one chooses to view it, death goes hand in hand with the New Greed Deal.

 

By Justin O. Smith

_________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’


By John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 15, 2019

Rose sent this to me via Facebook Messenger. This is a chain email. Chain emails are notorious for degrees of stretching the truth to downright just deceiving. The object is to spread the message of the chain email to as many readers as possible. Depending on the intended goal of a chain email, a carrot or a stick is employed to spur on chain email dissemination. A carrot might read something like: Send this to five people and God will bless you with prosperity. A stick may look like: If you read this, you must send this to five people or your life will be cursed with misery. OR a neutral carrot as in the chain email I’m about to share that reads: “Please Pass This On or Not!

 

As a rule, I NEVER pass on chain emails. But if I read one that bugs me, I enjoy exposing it. AND if I read one that has an element of truth, but has stretched or a little distorted facts – I like to show the better reality. Such is the case of a Chain Email sent to me via Facebook Messenger by a Facebook friend.

 

The theme of this Chain Email is that the growing Muslim population via migrants, refugees, immigrants and birth is Islamizing the United Kingdom. The truth is Britain’s Multiculturalist Left is so bent on accommodating its growing Muslim population that Islamic Culture is harming the Judeo-Christian-Western foundations of the United Kingdom’s original population. Think about it! The UK still has an Established Church and yet it is a hate-crime for a British Christian to defend their faith from Islamic doctrines contrary to Christian doctrines in public writings or public speech. Why? Such a Christian defense might (ACTUALLY PROBABLY) will insult a Muslim’s faith. AND by observation we know how significant Muslim populations react when they sense insult by non-Muslims. THEY RIOT, RAMPAGE and in some cases embark on murder or rape (mere examples).

 

Below is the Chain Email with my commentary in bold text.

 

JRH 2/15/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

**************

[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA

Posted by Rose Reed Brown

Via Facebook Messenger

Discovered: 2/13/19

 

So, England doesn’t like the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel! Imagine that!

I thought this might give you a better understanding of the insidiousness of Hegira [Blog Editor: Islamizing Medina – 620 – 622 AD AND Hegira-Jihad Emigration]; that’s the takeover of a nation without going to war. Don’t think for a moment that America is not a target or that there are no American cities where Islamic and Sharia victories and takeovers have already occurred. It’s time for border control, or start planning for a very big goodbye to the American way of life!

Here’s what has already happened to England within a few years of opening their borders without any entry control:

How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

Mayor of London … MUSLIM [Sadiq Khan 2016-Present]

Mayor of Birmingham … MUSLIM [Mahmood Hussain (2002–2003), Chauhdry Abdul Rashid (2008–2009) & Shafique Shah (2014–2015)]

Mayor of Leeds … MUSLIM [Mohammed Iqbal will be the 113th Lord Mayor of Leeds (2006)] 

Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM [Salas R. Kiani(1999-2000), Yusuf Jan-Virmani (2005-06), Mohammed Khan (2008-09) and Zamir Khan (2012-13)]

Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM [Magid Magid (2018 – Present)]

Mayor of Oxford .. MUSLIM [Mohammed Abbasi (2014-15) and Mohammed Altaf-Khan (2016-17)]

Mayor of Luton [List Doc Download] …. MUSLIM [Mukunda Bhusan Guha (1991–92), Mohammed Ashraf (1995–96), Masood Akhtar (1997–98), Raja Mohammed Saleem (1999-2000 & 2002-03), Waheed Akbar (2000-01), Kazi Haji Abid Hussain (2005–06), Lakhbir Singh (2008–09), Mohammed Riaz Butt (2009–10), Mohammed Farooq (2014–15), Tahir Khan (2016–17) and Naseem Ayub (2018-Present)]

Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM [Riaz Ahmad (2002-03), Abdul Jabbar (2005-05), Shoab Akhtar (2008-09), Fida Hussain (2014-15), Ateeque Ur-Rehman (2015-16), Shadab Qumer (2017-18) and Javid Iqbal (2018-Present)]

Mayor of Rochdale …. MUSLIM [Sultan Ali (2003-04), Zulfiqar Ali (2010-11) and Mohammed Zaman (2018-Present)]

All the following achieved by just 4 million Muslims [According to gov.uk in 2018: 3,372,966]  out of the 66 million population:

Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques [According to Daily Mail 2018: 1500 Mosques]

Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts [American Thinker 8/6/18: 130 – Daily Mail 6/4/18: 30-85 as in too secretive to enumerate – The Guardian 2/18/18: estimates range from 30 to 85 or more]

Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils [The best I could determine, a Sharia Court and a Sharia Council are one and the same. Quote from news.co.uk:

“Controversial Sharia councils or courts, how they fit in with the British legal system and how they treat women, are at the centre of two Government inquiries.”]

Muslims Only No-Go Areas Across The UK [Gatestone Institute (2/3/15) definition: “No-go zones can be defined as Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas.” There are no government cordoned off as a No-Go Zone, rather the designation is by word of mouth based on non-Muslim fear. Here is a list provided by the same Gatestone Institute:

 

Birmingham: Bordesley Green (includes Small Heath) (73.9%); Hodge Hill (includes areas of Saltley and Ward End) (41.5%); Ladywood (35.2%); Lozells and East Handsworth (48.9%); Nechells (43.5%); Sparkbrook (includes Sparkhill) (70.2%); Washwood Heath (includes Alum Rock) (77.3%).

 

Blackburn with Darwen: Audley (68.7%); Bastwell (85.3%); Corporation Park (62.6%); Little Harwood (51.9%); Queen’s Park (51.5%); Shear Brow (77.7%); Wensley Fold (39.8%)

 

Bolton (Greater Manchester): Crompton (32.7 %); Great Lever (36.6%); Halliwell (27.9%); Rumworth (51.8%)

 

Bradford (West Yorkshire): Bowling and Barkerend (45.8%); Bradford Moor (72.8%); City (57.3%); Great Horton (42.8%); Heaton (55.9%); Keighley Central (51.2%); Little Horton (58.0%); Manningham (75.0%); Toller (76.1%)

 

Brent: Barnhill (23.3%); Dollis Hill (31.3%); Dudden Hill (23.5%); Harlesden (21.8%); Stonebridge (28.2%)

 

Dewsbury (West Yorkshire): Dewsbury South (including Savile Town) (43.8%); Dewsbury West (46.7%)

 

Leeds: Gipton and Harehills (33.2%)

 

Leicester: Charnwood (38.7%); Coleman (39.7%); Spinney Hills (69.6%); Stoneygate (50.2%)

 

London Borough of Enfield: Edmonton Green (29.1%); Haselbury (25.7%); Jubilee (24.1%); Lower Edmonton (24.1%); Ponders End (29.0%); Upper Edmonton (26.4%)

 

London Borough of Tower Hamlets: Bethnal Green South (45.7%); Bromley-by-Bow (48.7%); East India and Lansbury (42.9%); Limehouse (35.5%); Mile End and Globe Town (34.3%); Mile End East (45.9%); Shadwell (46.7%); Spitalfields and Banglatown (38.6%); St Dunstan’s and Stepney Green (48.7%); Weavers (30.3%); and Whitechapel (42.4%).

 

London Borough of Newham: Boleyn (40.5%); East Ham Central (39.6%); East Ham North (50.1%); Green Street East (49.1%); Green Street West (50.4%); Little Ilford (44.8%); Manor Park (45.4%); Wall End (33.9%)

 

London Borough of Redbridge: Clementswood (42.7%); Cranbrook (36.6%); Goodmayes (33.5%); Loxford (46.0%); Mayfield (34.6%); Newbury (29.4%); Seven Kings (31.3%); Valentines (40.0%)

 

London Borough of Waltham Forest: Forest (31.9%); Lea Bridge (32.3%); Leyton (30.2%); Markhouse (32.4%)

 

Luton: Biscot (64.6%); Dallow (includes parts of Bury Park) (61.6%); Saints (51.1%)

 

Manchester: Cheetham (43.3%); Longsight (53.8%); Rusholme (37.9%); Whalley Range (32.7%)

 

Oldham: Coldhurst (64.2%); Medlock Vale (32.3%); St Mary’s (58.7%); Werneth (68.2%)

 

Pendle: Bradley (45.7%); Brierfield (38.8%); Walverden (47.1%); Whitefield (69.8%)

 

Rochdale: Central Rochdale (52.4%); Milkstone and Deeplish (67.1%)

 

Slough: Baylis and Stoke (44.7%); Central (40.6%); Chalvey (37.2%)

 

Westminster: Church Street (42.0%); Harrow Road (24.1%); Hyde Park (25.1%); Queen’s Park (26.3%); Westbourne (33.1%)

 

Wycombe: Bowerdean (35.6%); Oakridge and Castlefield (45.7%)]

[Blog Editor: I cannot confirm any of the statistics below. Knowing chain emails my suspicion is at best inaccurate and at worst fabricated to support the actual culture clash that indeed exists between Western Culture and Islamic Culture. Here’s a quote from a EuroNews title, “Which European countries offer the most social benefits to migrants?” The date 9/16/15. Scroll down to “UNITEDKINGDOM”:

 

  • Accommodation tends to be private, paid for by the state.

 

  • Weekly allowance of 36.95 pounds (50.35 euros) per person to cover basic needs including food. Small extra amounts available for pregnant women, babies and young children.

 

  • Not normally allowed to work.

 

  • If granted asylum: same benefits as British nationals.]

 

Muslim Women…78% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing

Muslim Men…63% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing

 

[Blog Editor: It is my humble opinion that most Fact Checking websites are too Left Wing to be reliable in fact checking Conservative perspectives (of which Snopes – but limited to – is among the worst). The most even handed Fact Checking website in my opinion is Truth Or Fiction. Incidentally, Truth Or Fiction (TOF) places this Chain Email and its numerous variations as “Mostly Fiction” yet with some truth. TOF quotes the BBC on Muslim unemployment in relation the “Muslim Invasion” Muslim stats in the Chain Email:

 

… And it’s not clear where the Muslim Invasion email’s claims that 78% of Muslim women don’t work, and that 63% of Muslim men don’t work and receive government benefits like housing assistance. Research shows that those claims are incorrect — but U.K. Muslims are generally worse-off economically than other groups. Forty-six percent of Muslims live in the bottom 1o% of local authority districts that are considered “most depraved.” Additionally, employment rates are higher among Muslims than other religious groups, but not as high as the Muslim Invasion email claims, a 2015 study found:

 

One of the areas of concern the report highlights is how well these qualifications turn into employment, particularly for females. 29% of Muslim women between the ages of 16 and 24 are in employment, compared to approximately half the general population. For the ages group 25 – 49 the numbers show 57% of Muslim women in employment compared with 80% of women overall.

 

This raises a number of questions that were posed at the report’s launch as areas that need extra exploration – why are educated Muslim woman not carrying on into employment? Possible reasons cited being cultural influences encouraging them to have a family and stay at home, racism and prejudice in the workplace and/or their qualifications not being from institutions of a high enough standard to appeal to employers. The report notes that Muslim students are less likely to attend Russell Group universities.

 

TOS does not specifically address the full free benefits unemployed Muslims receive in the claims of the Chain Email. According to Britannica.com all legal residents in the UK (i.e. citizens and non-citizens) receive the same benefits (this would include Muslims):

 

The National Health Service (NHS) provides comprehensive health care throughout the United Kingdom. The NHS provides medical care through a tripartite structure of primary care, hospitals, and community health care. The main element in primary care is the system of general practitioners (family doctors), who provide preventive and curative care and who refer patients to hospital and specialist services. All consultations with a general practitioner under the NHS are free.

 

The other major types of primary medical care are dentistry and pharmaceutical and opthalmic services. These are the only services of the NHS for which charges are levied, though persons under age 16, past retirement, or with low incomes are usually exempt. Everyone else must pay charges that are below the full cost of the services involved.

 

 

Cash benefits

 

… Employers collect the contribution, and there is also an employer contribution. Separate arrangements exist for the self-employed. The revenue from contributions goes into the National Insurance Fund.

 

Insured individuals are entitled to unemployment compensation, cash benefits during sickness or disability, and a retirement pension. There are also benefits for individuals injured in work-related accidents and for widows. Whether or not they receive an insurance benefit, all are eligible for a noncontributory benefit. Employees who lose their jobs through no fault of their own receive lump-sum redundancy, or severance, payments, whose cost is met in part by their employers and in part from a general levy on employers.

 

The major noncontributory benefits, paid out of general tax revenues, offer poverty relief to individuals and families whose income and savings fall below some prescribed level. The benefit of last resort is income support (formerly called the supplementary benefit); it is payable to individuals whose entitlement to insurance benefits has been exhausted or has left them with a very low income and to those who never had any entitlement to an insurance benefit. Other means-tested benefits assist low-paid working families with children and help people on low incomes with their housing costs. An important class of noncontributory benefits is not means-tested, the major example being the child benefit, a weekly tax-free payment for each child, usually payable to the mother.

 

… The government also introduced a children’s tax credit to provide additional support to low- and middle-income families. There was a review of the benefit system in 1985 that changed the detailed workings of several benefits in 1988 but left the basic structure intact.

 

Housing

 

During the mid-20th century, local governments developed council houses (public housing estates) throughout the United Kingdom. At public housing’s peak, about 1970, local governments owned 30 percent of all housing in the country. Under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act of 1977 (which amended older legislation), local governments have a statutory obligation in certain circumstances to find housing for homeless families. Partly for that reason, they keep a substantial stock of housing for rent, maintain waiting lists, and allocate housing according to need…

 

 Education

 

Primary and secondary education

 

 

Primary education is free and compulsory from age 5 to 11. Secondary education is organized in a variety of ways for children aged 11 to 19 and is free and compulsory to age 16. In most parts of the United Kingdom, secondary schools are comprehensive; that is, they are open to pupils of all abilities. Pupils may stay on past the minimum school-leaving age of 16 to earn a certificate or take public examinations that qualify them for higher education.

 

The state finances primary and secondary education out of central and local tax revenues. Most expenditures take place at the local level, though about half of local revenues derive from the central government.]

 

Muslim Families…6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!

 

[Blog Editor: Most Fact Checkers debunk the “ONLY,” but that doesn’t mean a substantial amount of UK Public Schools do not serve Islamic ceremonial halal meat even to non-Muslims. Here’s an excerpt from an interesting article on halal meat in UK Public Schools from ParentPower.family examining European Human Rights in relation to halal meat in UK Public Schools (9/10/18):

 

In July of this year, Lancashire Council became the first in the UK to ban unstunned halal meat from being served in schools. Not all providers of halal meat will not stun the animal prior to slaughter, but The Lancashire Council of Mosques argued that the halal slaughter process “must avoid all forms of stunning.” In addition, “the slaughterman must personally invoke the name of Allah prior to every slaughter.”

 

freedom of information request to Liverpool Council in 2010 asked how many schools served halal meat in the Liverpool council area. The Council responded by saying that they did not hold this information centrally. This lack of central information means that nobody knows how many schools are serving halal meat in their canteens. There are certainly schools that only serve halal meat, whilst offering vegetarian alternatives. In some cases parents have not been informed that their children are eating halal meat. One school abandoned plans to serve only halal meat just hours after sending letters announcing the plan after parents complained.

 

Animal welfare is one reason why parents might want to object to halal meat in schools. Halal slaughter is also a religious sacrifice to Allah which means that some parents will have religious objections.

 

READ THE REST

 

Friends that’s way TOO MUCH Islamic influence in a Western Culture nation that serving Islamic ceremonial halal meat is even a consideration. Especially since Islamic revered writings condemn non-Muslims (Christians and Jews by name – the “People of the Book” respect is abrogated by the Quran attributed Muhammad’s Medina-recited surahs) as insulting infidels (aka kafir) if they do not submit to the superiority of Allah and Islam.]

 

…and we (the USA) and (CANADA) can’t decide on an immigration policy???

Read all of this and pass on. This can’t happen to us. Whatever it takes, we got to band together. Deport ALL MUSLIMS.

One of the ways to combat this is to keep circulating information such as this e-mail around our United States and Canada to inform the uninformed who mainly only listen and read the left leaning US and Canadian radio/TV and newspapers. I have not seen this in the US or Canadian media…have you?

Please Pass This On or Not!

____________________

Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’

By John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 15, 2019

___________________

[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA

 

Chain Email shared by Rose on Facebook Messenger.

 

Edited by John R. Houk with commentary

 

Kids Chasing Paradise


Did you know Muslim children all over the world are being taught and trained to kill non-Muslims – ALSO – all over the world? Check out this info from KidsTheMovie.com and the trailer sponsored by the Clarion Project.

 

JRH 2/13/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Kids Chasing Paradise

 

Kids is a powerful new documentary film that exposes the radicalization of children by Islamist extremists.

 

FILM SYNOPSIS

 

Childhood is supposed to be a special time in a person’s life. A time to grow and play, to explore and learn about the world. All children deserve a peaceful upbringing and the opportunity to pursue a meaningful life.

 

But today, Islamist states and organizations are systematically indoctrinating the next generation of kids to embrace violence and hatred.

 

These children cannot help but internalize these values and become filled with hate. At worst, they commit acts of terror.

 

This radicalization is also happening at home, in the West. Islamists are using new methods to reach a broader audience and lure Western teenagers to buy into their poisonous ideology.

 

Kids: Chasing Paradise is a powerful new film that takes an unflinching look at the brutal exploitation of youth by extremists worldwide. The documentary features compelling personal stories of children, who are actively influenced by extremists, and their families, and showcases activists and experts who confront this growing global threat.

 

CHARACTERS

 

FILMMAKERS

 

SUBSCRIBE: BE THE FIRST TO GET KIDS: CHASING PARADISE AND OTHER CLARION PROJECT CONTENT – Sign up to our Newsletter

 

VIDEO: Kids: Chasing Paradise – Official Trailer – Spring 2019

 

Posted by Clarion Project

Published on Feb 11, 2019

______________________

© 2019 Clarion Project Inc. All Rights Reserved

 

The Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund) is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization dedicated to educating both policy makers and the public about the growing phenomenon of Islamic extremism. The Clarion Project is committed to working towards safeguarding human rights for all peoples.

 

Us vs Them


Justin Smith tackles the existence of political gridlock in America today, blaming it on the irreconcilable differences between the Dems and GOP. Justin quite correctly points to the gridlock as the Dems have lurched toward Marxism sanitized under the term – Democratic Socialism. Just like the Dems like to call themselves Progressives to disguise their current Marxist agenda, telling Americans that a Democratic Socialist is a Socialism for the people.

 

Spoiler alert: Justin believes (and I agree) that the Two-Party system as it exists today makes America ungovernable. When America is ungovernable, what will it lead to?

 

JRH 2/12/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

***************

Us vs Them

The Republic Hangs In The Balance: Communists, Devils and SOBs

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/10/2019 9:07 PM

 

Most of the American public feels that the future of the Republic hangs in the balance. “Four more years of Trump… and it will be the end of us…” they say. Or… “I hope those Democrats don’t get into office; did you see those taxes they’re proposing?”

 

We are programmed to see the world that way. It’s “Us vs. Them.” You just have to decide which “Us” you’re part of.

 

But what if you’ve chosen the wrong “Us”? What if neither the Republicans nor the Democrats will save the Republic?

 

We’re pretty well stuck with the Two-Party System for Now — the Choice We made Despite George Washington’s admonishment against parties — until we can kill the parties off, DISCARD THEM LIKE OLD BROKEN DOWN SHOES.

 

America needs to kill the two party system and simply allow the best man or woman with the best ideas and vision for the nation win the day. But that will not be an easy thing, since parties determine the ballot; however, it can be done, if the people will it so.

 

Short of this, patriotic Americans must help both parties purge their ranks of anti-American communists, socialists, Muslims and globalists, who do not work within the confines of the U.S. Constitution and do not protect and defend it and our nation’s Founding Principles. It’s past time we make it known that the ideas of Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao have absolutely no place in America’s culture.

 

I am afraid it’s going to take a civil war to drive this point home. Our divide has never been so great, all due to one side’s abandoning the vision and the mechanisms placed in our system, by Our Founding Fathers.

 

We have arrived at the day described by Washington, when men and women place party allegiance over allegiance and loyalty to America. But it’s even more serious than many can know. We have allowed a large segment of the population to be indoctrinated by the advocates and progenitors of Marxist Socialism, a foreign ideology that is antithetical to our Founding Principles, acting through sedition and treason against our nation; and this large segment is now represented by the Democratic Party, just as RINOs are its agents in the Republican Party.

 

Communism has long infiltrated our nation and both parties [Dems], from its spawning in 1848, and it seeks our subjugation and the end of individual liberty.

 

So, as we proceed rather warily and regard the future for America’s Children, when You select a candidate for any office, try to get Your community on the same page to vote for someone — A Person, A Statesman and Not A Party — who holds proven views that support the greatest economic prosperity through an individual’s own efforts and free choices; who supports known ideas, virtues and principles that allow for the greatest realm of individual liberty possible.

 

Work like hell to get them elected.

 

And then push all elected representatives to rescind superfluous laws and bad or illegitimate law that impedes any God-given right or the Bill of Rights, and make these legislators ask the following before each bill is voted upon.

 

Does this bill help all Americans? Or does it harm more Americans than it helps?

 

Does this bill create real potential for greater prosperity? Or does it impede economic growth?

 

Does this bill take anything away from individual liberty? Too many bills do this very thing simply due to the fact they fall under the auspices of the government; by this alone, Congress should be passing VERY FEW “Laws” each year, instead of thousands of new laws that not one citizen in the nation can possibly know or obey in their entirety.

 

There are only two things worth fighting for. You are either protecting your stuff or you are protecting yourself. But against whom?

 

Those devils in the Republican party? Or those SOBs, the Democrats?

 

The Democrats are vying with each other to see who can come up with a new tax, likely to be seen at the 70% mark, to take away our property; we surely don’t want them in charge.

 

But wait… the Republicans increased spending by some $500 billion over two years… and added $2 trillion to the federal debt. Where did they think that money would come from?

 

Where is the “Us” worthy of support? Where is the “Them” that should be annihilated? Well … for starters we definitely can say it is those illiberal and intolerant Communists, Socialists, Fascists and Muslims within our borders, who should be annihilated; since they have just about forced our nation to Her knees as they repeatedly and often attack our Founding Judeo-Christian Principles, Our Constitution and Our Freedoms and Liberties and God-given Rights.

 

Tell Your Congressmen and Senators, that You would PREFER THEY DO NOTHING RATHER THAN PASS BAD, ILLEGITIMATE LAW THAT FURTHER ERODES OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.

 

Make this a plan for ELECTION 2020!!!

 

~ Justin O Smith

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the /editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Facebook Censoring SlantRight 2.0 Blog


John R. Houk

© February 7, 2019

 

Justin Smith noticed one of Blogs has received HUGE censorship status on Facebook. I operate three blogs all with different names. The blog so far, under Facebook censorship attack is SlantRight 2.0. My other two blogs are on WordPress (NeoConservative Christian Right [NCCR]) and on OverBlog (Ubiquitous8Thoughts). I mention all my blogs because I suspect after sharing this post on Facebook via the NCCR blog, a censorship ban will occur.

 

Just as a side note, I use OverBlog out of curiosity. OverBlog is based in Europe (France in particular) existing under EU Free Speech limiting laws. I’ve been wondering when OverBlog will boot me for breaking EU laws. Sticking up for Biblical Morality and criticizing the dark side of Islam are Hate Speech violations in the EU. AND YET, Ubiquitous8Thoughts still is in operation. I suspect the reason is low readership.

 

After Justin Smith posted on my Facebook Group – Social Media Jail Conversations for Conservatives & Counterjihadists – that Facebook was censoring my flagship blog, I went to the Facebook Support page to see how bad the censorship is. It is bad.

 

I created that Facebook Group out of frustration of landing in Facebook jail more than once. I sense another Facebook jail term in my future. If not an outright ban or perhaps termination of my small Facebook membership. I welcome all to join at least as a symbol of being AGAINST Facebook censorship.

 

By the way. If you have received the boot from Facebook, the social media platform MeWe is gaining ground in popularity. My MeWe Profile Page. MeWe isn’t quite as simple to use as Facebook, but it’s getting there.

 

All three of my blogs have a link for a contribution (sorry, not tax deductible) that helps with paying for services I use in blogging efforts:

 

 

 

 

In case anyone wonders, here are Facebook’s nebulous Community Standards:

 

Safety: People need to feel safe in order to build community. We are committed to removing content that encourages real-world harm, including (but not limited to) physical, financial, and emotional injury.

 

Voice: Our mission is all about embracing diverse views. We err on the side of allowing content, even when some find it objectionable, unless removing that content can prevent a specific harm. Moreover, at times we will allow content that might otherwise violate our standards if we feel that it is newsworthy, significant, or important to the public interest. We do this only after weighing the public interest value of the content against the risk of real-world harm.

 

Equity: Our community is global and diverse. Our policies may seem broad, but that is because we apply them consistently and fairly to a community that transcends regions, cultures, and languages. As a result, our Community Standards can sometimes appear less nuanced than we would like, leading to an outcome that is at odds with their underlying purpose. For that reason, in some cases, and when we are provided with additional context, we make a decision based on the spirit, rather than the letter, of the policy.

 

Everyone on Facebook plays a part in keeping the platform safe and respectful. We ask people to share responsibly and to let us know when they see something that may violate our Community Standards. We make it easy for people to report potentially violating content, including Pages, Groups, profiles, individual content, and/or comments to us for review. We also give people the option to blockunfollow, or hide people and posts, so that they can control their own experience on Facebook.

 

The consequences for violating our Community Standards vary depending on the severity of the violation and a person’s history on the platform. For instance, we may warn someone for a first violation, but if they continue to violate our policies, we may restrict their ability to post on Facebook or disable their profile. We also may notify law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or a direct threat to public safety.

Our Community Standards, which we will continue to develop over time, serve as a guide for how to communicate on Facebook. It is in this spirit that we ask members of the Facebook community to follow these guidelines.

 

Violence and Criminal Behavior

 

Safety

 

On Justin’s Facebook post I linked to the titles that are used by him as censored by Facebook. You should check them out to see if you think they are worthy of censorship according to Facebook Community Standards. Here are a few other titles censored from the SlantRight 2.0 blog (in no particular order of censorship):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do me and Justin a favor. Share the be-jesus out these posts (probably not on Facebook, but you can give it a shot).

 

JRH 2/7/9

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

******************

Facebook Censorship
Justin Smith 

2/6/19 3:24 PM

Facebook Group Social Media Jail Conversations for Conservatives & Counterjihadists Part One & Two

 

It’s simply unbelievable and unfathomable that Facebook would mark my tribute and memorial to Pete Doughtie, my friend and editor, as something that goes “against community standards”. And so it begins Folks.

 

My article ‘The Passing of a Great Man’ at Slanted Right is the piece being targeted, as well as several other pieces — one on immigration ‘The Democratic Party Endangers America’s Cultural Heritage’ and my latest pieces on abortion — ‘The Baby Murder Act’ and ‘Beyond A Sad Day In America’.

 

Anything that highlights conservative causes, our nation’s founding principles, issues related to life, and anything else that rankles the Communists of the Democratic Party and Facebook and Google and Twitter IS BEING PURGED, BANNED AND DELETED.

 

Facebook, Google and twitter and all those on the Left who use these CENSORSHIP TACTICS Must be made to suffer the consequences of their illiberal, tyrannical actions … however we may accomplish it.

 

Predictably, Facebook has banned my articles from Slanted Right … the last four pieces as near as I can tell, starting with ‘The Passing of a Great Man’.

 

I’d like to know, just how in the hell does a memorial for a man who did so much for his community, his state and America, go “against community standards”. Here was a man who knew Ted Cruz, Geert Wilders and a litany of other high ranking government officials … which numerous photos document … and Facebook says my tribute to him “violates community standards”.

 

I hope they are just focused on my articles right now and not the actual website. But when I tried to copy and paste a Slanted Right URL, Facebook wouldn’t let the preview appear.

 

It’s time to call FB on the carpet, before Congress and force Congress to make them halt the violation of our Free Speech and Freedom of Expression RIGHTS, since they are a publicly traded stock. We should also mount a petition to force the break-up of Facebook AND Google Under ANTI-TRUST LAW.

 

We are really under attack, even if it is just a soft attack at the moment. But this is just a foreshadowing of things to come, and this is how it has always started in other authoritarian countries, just before they used armed violence against their own citizens.

While it’s true that FB has no weight of government behind it technically, in practice, its money is moving the federal government to either look at FB with a blind eye or simply ignore the problem, even as the Democratic Party and some RINOs advocate FB “hate-speech” policy and attempt to place it in “law”. Any such “hate-speech” RULE CANNOT BE LAW, SINCE IT VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

 

The day any such illegitimate and UnConstitutional “Law” passes both houses of the Congress is the day I leave dead communist red radical rat Democrat and RINO bastards in my wake.

 

We are living in dangerous times. Never has Freedom and Liberty been so tenuous and vulnerable and at risk of being lost. And the majority of the American people are asleep at the helm.

 

God Bless You All and God Bless Our Beloved America. May He Keep Her Free For All Eternity and Damn Her Enemies Both Foreign And Domestic To The Hell They Have Earned And So Richly Deserve.

 

de Oppresso Liber ___ On My Honor ___ On My Life

 

And In Liberty ~ Justin O Smith

__________________

Facebook Censoring SlantRight 2.0 Blog

John R. Houk

© February 7, 2019

_________________

Facebook Censorship

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links added by Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Beyond a Sad Day In America


Justin Smith addresses the immorality of various States passing abortion laws allowing the murder of full term babies. God have mercy on America.

 

JRH 2/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

******************

Beyond a Sad Day In America

The Monstrous Abortion Laws 

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/2/2019 8:00 PM

 

Deuteronomy 30:19 ~ I have set before you Life and Death and Cursing; therefore Choose Life, that both thou and thy seed may live.

 

It is beyond a sad day in America, when we witness illegitimate “laws” and infanticide, that allow a full term baby capable of living outside the womb to be murdered on its way through the birth canal, if a woman so chooses for any reason. We’re witnessing a deliberative body of several state legislatures, swayed by radical, demonic abortionists in the Democratic Party, from New York to Virginia and Rhode Island to Vermont, among many others, make conscious, premeditated decisions to legalize murder, and, as a rule, they prefer to sign a baby’s death warrant rather than seek alternatives that protect both the unborn child and the woman, the mother to be.

 

The Democratic Party and its followers seem to have taken a page from the writings of Thomas Malthus, Karl Marx, Josef Mengele, Margaret Sanger and the March 1st 2012 Journal of Medical Ethics, that I noted on March 12th 2012 in ‘Choose Freedom … Choose Life’. Abortion has long been used to destroy family units to ensure government power and control, and today we are seeing Malthusian eugenics make a resurgence, along with the monstrous suggestion that a child, any child, does not have a moral right to life AFTER its birth.

 

Thankfully, Virginia’s infanticide bill failed, and in the course of events, a video of delegate Kathy Tran explaining  how her bill would allow abortion, as the expectant mother was in the middle of contractions, ignited fiery controversy. Tran later acknowledged that her law would have run afoul of existing anti-infanticide laws.

 

Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, a pediatric neurosurgeon, further inflamed America with his comments days after New York Andrew Cuomo signed the Reproductive Health Act that allows late term abortion “at any time” to “protect a patient’s life or health”. The RHA also repealed protections for born babies that survive failed abortions, and other states, like Rhode Island are following suit and introducing bills that would repeal bans on partial-birth abortion.

 

Yes. Don’t let a little thing like the baby actually exiting the mother’s womb stop anyone from murdering it.

 

On January 30th, Governor Northam spoke with DC’s WTOP Radio, in reference to failed abortions. According to Northam, the baby is out of the womb, the umbilical cord cut, and lying on a table next to the woman’s bed, and after a discussion between the doctors and the woman, the baby could be killed in the same manner a full-term baby is killed in a partial birth abortion. The baby’s brains are sucked out through a vacuum until her head collapses, even though just moments earlier she was crying, instinctively longing to be held and fed.

 

Medical experts such as Dr. Omar Hamada recently stated, “There’s absolutely no reason to kill a baby before delivery in the third trimester”.

 

It is a shame that the majority of abortionists don’t have the same epiphany as Dr. Anthony Levatino had years ago. His testimony on May 17th 2012, before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803) should be required reading for all high school youths. He spoke of the Sopher clamp with its ragged rows of jagged teeth made for clamping and crushing tissue and of the white fluid that leaves the woman’s cervix after the baby’s brain has been crushed — a procedure he had performed over 1200 times between 1981 and 1985. And then, he tells how his adopted daughter, Heather, was hit by a car and killed on June 23rd 1984, which prompted him to reject doing any more abortions.

 

Dr. Levatino, encouraged by a Catholic bishop, now tells everyone: “When you lose a child, life is different. Everything changes … the idea of a person’s life becomes very real. It is not an embryology course anymore … it’s your child buried … I couldn’t even think about a D&E abortion anymore.”

 

Continuing his Congressional testimony, he gives one example of saving a woman’s life by “terminating her pregnancy” through a Cesarean section; mother and baby did well afterwards. And he ends his testimony noting: “During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by ‘terminating’ pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.

 

Leftist abortionists can tout baby murder as in the interest of women’s health all they wish, but the facts and their own contradictions belie their assertions. These new laws, like New York’s, allow non-physicians to perform abortions; they dismiss research that reveal the physical and psychological damage women incur from abortions; they refuse to inform young women about the risks associated with an abortion, and they do not counsel them on the option of adoption. These abortionists cloak their true agenda in the euphemism of “choice”.

 

No question exists that a partially delivered baby is a human being, although some will argue that it’s not so cut and dried early on in the pregnancy. At forty weeks, there is absolutely no reason to prevent the UnBorn Child from claiming his or her God-given right to life, which supersedes the woman’s vacuous right to privacy.

 

The Leftist position is morally repugnant, and goes against the grain and most Americans’ belief in protecting innocent life. They believe baby murder to be perfectly acceptable in their defense of abortion rights, and even so, they try to pretend they hold the moral high ground. Surely a viable baby is innocent, too.

 

These latest laws are atrocious to human beings, and they are nothing short of eugenics, nothing less than infanticide manifested in evil human selfishness in the ugliest way imaginable, and a fundamental shift in America’s conscience. The red radical Democratic Party makes a big show of empathy for the weak and marginalized, and yet, few if any shed a tear for the slaughter of millions of UnBorn Children, the most vulnerable among us. And this is the most tragic and complete denigration of America’s founding spirit of righteousness.

 

Roe v Wade is only an activist ruling made by the Supreme Court. It is not “the law of the land” as many Leftists suggest, and it is certainly not settled “law”.

 

On the federal level, Americans must stop allowing any majority of activist Black Robes to circumvent the U.S. Constitution by finding “new rights” within the Constitution that require a flight of fancy to discover. Only Congress can actually make law, and Congress needs to restrain the Court to its proper role and ignore Roe v Wade and also move to make abortion illegal across the country, except, in the most rare of circumstances, when a young mother’s life is truly endangered by the pregnancy, and she already has small children.

 

“There are times which we attempt to compromise in order to bring two opposing sides together for the benefit of all concerned.

 

There are other times when we are presented with a clear and distinct watershed. The opposition has as its only purpose to impose their will on all without compromise, without apology, and without recourse to the opposed.

 

It is at these times we must be courageous, stand firm, and fight. That time is now!” ~ Francis Schaeffer / ‘The Great Evangelical Disaster’

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Could 2020 Electoral College Fail Trump Reelection?


Joe Esposito just wrote on Facebook (I found on the group Friends Of Liberty Blog) about the growing amount of Dems vying between themselves for the Dem nomination to seemingly see who can be the most Socialist. BUT what caught my attention is Esposito’s view that the 2020 Electoral College outcome, appears to be working against President Trump’s reelection.

The thought kind of slapped me in the face because his observation seemed quite logical to me. If accurate, the President needs to get busy NOW to work the States that will push an Electoral College reelection!

 

Joe Esposito did not provide a title to his thoughts other than the moniker he includes with all his posts – “I THINK, THEREFORE I BLOG”. I’m arbitrarily coming up with a different title. I pray that doesn’t rub Mr. Esposito the wrong way.

 

JRH 1/29/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Could 2020 Electoral College Fail Trump Reelection?

 

By Joe Esposito (I THINK, THEREFORE I BLOG)

January 29, 2019 4:26 PM

Facebook Closed Group – Friends of Liberty Blog

 

One by one they announce for the presidency. Each is about as SOCIALISTIC as one can possibly be. Be prepared to be even more frightened for you cannot count out Dastardly Hillary. She hasn’t said YES but then again, she hasn’t said NO. It’s being reported with the INDICTMENT of Roger Stone she feels somewhat vindicated. The question people are asking, “Does she have the BALLS to give it another GO?” Inquiring minds would sure like to know. As of now Kamala Harris is the ‘new flavor of the month’. Her political strengths she really tries to assert. But she is as VACUOUS as they come, sort of like a Barack Obama in a skirt. She is one of many Democrat LIGHTWEIGHTS who keep pushing one another more and more to the LEFT. Their LUNATIC fringe is an absolute state of glee. It is utterly unfathomable that any of these DIRTBAGS can find their way to the Presidency.

 

But we must realize that the electoral map is in their favor. President Trump in his reelection bid has absolutely no room for error. There’s no doubt he will hold on to his southern base, but he also needs Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. We are a long way from the 2020 campaign. Between now and then anything can happen. For the past two years TRUMP HATE has turned politics on its head. It’s been in utter turmoil. The disgusting mainstream media certainly ‘stirs the pot.’ It brings everything to a boil. The extreme negative coverage of Trump brings the FAR LEFT LUNATICS much hope. They’re determined to force him out of the Presidency. The thought of any of these Democrat hopefuls becoming President of our beloved America is sheer LUNACY.

 

The HATERS see Trump as battered, bruised and beaten. His future they see as getting [more and] more BLEAK. Our President may be down but is only temporary. He may have lost this SHUTDOWN battle but in the end,  he will win this WAR. He’ll achieve a VICTORY. But in the meantime, the HATERS are cheering and seem to be riding high. It is enough to give us much pain. In the court of public opinion there is much to gain. Trump must focus with laser precision on what must be done. We all know what it is. FIXING THE IMMIGRATION CRISIS. He doesn’t need to be reminded that was the main reason that he won. If he does this, he will win re-election no matter what POS** the Democrats decide to run.

 

**[Blog Editor: I’m afraid I am quit lacking in acronyms used on the Internet. I don’t have a clue what “POS” represents. In the context of the sentence, perhaps this acronym translation conveys the Esposito intent:

 

Point Of Sale – POS

 

REVIEWED BY WILL KENTON

Updated Jun 19, 2018

 

What is a Point Of Sale – POS

A point of sale (POS), or point of purchase, is the place where a customer executes the payment for goods or services, and where sales taxes may become payable, whether it be in a physical store, where POS terminals and systems are used to process card payments, or a virtual sales point such as a computer or mobile electronic device.

 

… (Investopedia)

 

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk (Spellcheck the primary tool)

 

© Joe Esposito