A National Emergency and Border Security


Justin Smith explains how President Trump is using his authorized National Emergency power to keep making America great again despite of Dem Party subversion to keep America weak.

 

JRH 2/17/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

********************

A National Emergency and Border Security

President Trump Counters Bad Border Deal 

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/15/2019 9:08 PM

 

“We want to have a safe country. I ran on a very simple slogan – ‘Make America Great Again.’ If you’re going to have drugs pouring across the border, if you’re going to have human traffickers pouring across the border in areas where we have no protection, in areas where we don’t have a barrier, then, [it is] very hard to make America great again.~ President Donald J. Trump, Rose Garden Speech February 15th 2019

 

President Trump simultaneously declared a national emergency for humanitarian and national security reasons along the border. In the same breath, he noted on February 15th that he would sign the omnibus bill and the bad Border Deal it contains; and in fact, he signed it shortly afterwards, acquiring authority over the $1.375 billion appropriated for the wall, while declaring his intention to spend eight billion more dollars through his authority under the national emergency declaration.

 

The President was left with very little choice from an intransigent, duplicitous Democratic Party leadership in control of the House, at the moment, such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had vowed “not $1 for the wall”. He took a head on approach to avoid another partial government shutdown, however unwise a course it may be, while he diverts $6.5 billion to build portions of the wall that the Democrats have refused to authorize.

 

Americans across the board want The Wall built. These Democrats are against the American people and against U.S. Sovereignty. [Blog Editor: In November 2016, Donald Trump was elected President largely on the promise of a big beautiful wall. YET most recent polls show American disfavor for a border wall. Why? No one can give a definitive answer (unless of course you are a lying Leftist). But here is something to mull over as you hear the Left-Stream Media quote polls most Americans do not want a wall: Those same polls back in November 2016 told Americans Crooked Hillary would win the vote to become President. Those polls were wrong then and I STRONGLY suspect those polls are wrong NOW!]

 

The Republican Party got smoked and beaten badly in this deal. Who in the Hell was negotiating for them?

 

Making the declaration was a strong move for national security and to gain further momentum for the Republicans leading up to the 2020 election, since the Border Deal was a farce of a deal, that only funded 55 miles of the wall, rather than the 200 miles requested.

During his speech on Friday at the White House Rose Garden, President Trump stated: “We’re going to confront the national security crisis on our southern border, and we’re going to do it, one way or another. We have to do it. … We’re talking about an invasion of our country.”

 

Many previous presidents have declared national emergencies prior to this, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama. There were already 31 active national emergencies in the U.S., before President Trump’s declaration marked the 32nd.

 

One should also note, when Obama used his pen to counter U.S. immigration law and implement DACA, to safeguard Illegal Aliens, he eroded U.S. sovereignty, and he went against the Constitution and the express will of the American people. On the other hand, President Trump’s actions are in line with his Constitutional edict to defend and protect U.S. borders and the Constitution.

 

However, the abdication of Congress, in the face of this and many other dire problems, i.e. out-of-control spending, and its relinquishing of its own power and authority over the decades, gave all previous presidents extraordinary power to act in the face of a national emergency, through numerous laws passed by Congress. President Trump has referred to the 1976 National Emergencies Act found at 50 U.S. Code 1601-1651.

 

In light of all this, there is still no way to see this so-called compromise as a anything less than a major loss, once one views the fine print in the Border Deal, which is even worse than it first appeared. It’s the fine print that should have had Republicans turning their backs on this deal. And it’s no wonder the Democrats were in such a rush to sign, not just to avoid a shutdown.

 

Not even 24 hours had elapsed from the introduction of the 1,169 page bill to the vote. House rules require 72 hours for representatives to review a bill.

 

According to Daniel Horowitz, writing at Conservative Review, the bill limits construction to just the Rio Grande Valley sector, disallowing any concrete barriers, while section 231 of the bill prohibits construction even within this area in five locations, that are either state or federal lands. And, much worse, this bill gives veto power to local officials, who may not want the wall in their area.

 

The Rio Grande area is in dire need of significant security measures and an actual physical wall. However, it is home to some of some of the most hardcore “progressive” liberals, and giving these local Democrat satraps a veto over the wall is nothing less than a poison pill.

 

Prior to the President signing the bill, former border officials told Fox News, and several other media outlets, that expanded protections for potential sponsors of unaccompanied migrant children were “land mines” that make the bill worthy of a presidential veto.

 

The Border Deal is one massive betrayal of the American people, in what Daniel Horowitz framed as “a blatant amnesty for the world’s worst cartel smugglers. Section 224 (a) prohibits the deportation of anyone who is sponsoring an “unaccompanied” minor illegal alien; anyone who says they might sponsor an Unaccompanied Child, and anyone who lives in a household with a UAC or a household that potentially might sponsor a UAC. … “the very people paying the cartels to invade us.”

 

This invasion is driven by the intentional skewing of the UAC law, that sets forth what constitutes a true “refugee”. Central American teenagers are only supposed to be treated as refugees, if they are a victim of sex and drug trafficking or have no relatives in America, and yet, nearly each and every one of them is self-trafficked by their own extremely illegal relatives, who reside in America. Rather than saying “No Deal” or forcing much needed changes to the bill, the Republicans went ahead with this miserable fleecing of the American people, which rewards these Illegal Aliens with a de facto amnesty.

 

And from the Center for Immigration Studies, Jessica Vaughn’s interpretation was even grimmer: “We can call this the MS-13 Household Protection Act of 2019.”

 

In justifying his emergency declaration, President Trump repeatedly acknowledged and honored the presence of the Angel Moms in attendance, as he retold the stories of their children’s deaths at the hands of Illegal Aliens. Some of the Angel Moms in the Rose Garden urged the president not to sign the bipartisan bill, noting that it contained several measures that incentivized illegal immigration.

 

At one point in his speech President Trump exclaimed:

 

“We’re talking about an invasion of our country with drugs, with human traffickers, with all types of criminals and gangs. We have some of the greatest people here; I know — they’ve been with me from the beginning of my campaign, almost from the first week — the Angel Moms. Unfortunately, we have new Angel Moms.

 

One incredible woman just showed me her daughter who — we’re talking about killed — in the year of 18. I said, I haven’t seen you before. She said, ‘No, I’m new.’ I said, that’s too bad. It’s too bad. It’s so sad. Stand up, just for a second. Show how beautiful your girl was [in the picture she held]. Thank You.”

 

The President called his actions necessary given the scale of the problem along the southern border, as he responded to CNN Jim Acosta’s suggestion that he had “concocted” an emergency for political gain, whereupon the President responded: “Ask these women [Angel Moms] if there’s a national emergency.”

 

He expects to be met by numerous legal challenges, even as the ACLU sharpens its pencil. He also expects to win in the Supreme Court.

 

Under the Emergency Declaration, President Trump  will attempt to appropriate discretionary military funds to close the gap between the nearly $1.4 billion Congress appropriated for The Wall and the $5.7 billion he has long demanded. However, now the president is reaching for $8 billion, by taking $600 million from the Treasury, the Treasury forfeiture front and $2,5 billion out of the Defense Department. His staff is also looking at using drug interdiction funds and the $3.5 billion they discovered in the military construction budget, that certainly won’t conflict with the President’s constitutional mandate to defend America.

 

Declaring the emergency also puts a companion statute in motion — 10 U.S. Code 2808, that gives the president authority to create military construction projects using funds appropriated for other military projects, such as a $10 billion account approved by Congress last September, for the Army Corps of Engineers, with its military and civilian workforce of 37,000 people.

 

Once he declares an emergency, a companion statute, 10 U.S. Code 2808, says the president can create military construction projects, using funds originally intended for other military projects such as a $10-billion account that Congress approved last September. That money involves the Army Corps of Engineers, with its military and civilian workforce of 37,000 people, which is why a border wall might become a military project

 

Love him or hate him, no one can say that President Donald Trump isn’t standing up for America. He isn’t usurping any powers, not when Congress gave it to him, because they are risk-averse and want to pass the buck to him rather than accept responsibility themselves — dodging accountability and evading its Constitutional duty. Yes — Love him or hate him — President Trump is ideally suited to lead America at this pivotal moment precisely due to his ability to go where no other President would, being a warrior for the American people, whom he so obviously loves

 

By Justin O. Smith

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

AOC’s Marshall Plan for America


Justin Smith examines the disaster that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Dems would foist on America through the Communistic Green New Deal (GND).

 

JRH 2/16/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

***********************

AOC’s Marshall Plan for America

America’s Wild-Eyed Communists

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent Originally 2/13/19 8:39 PM

Update sent: 2/15/2019 6:44 PM

 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s radical “Green New Deal” legislation proposal [Blog Editor: Farting cows in original version mysteriously disappears in final version], presented to America on February 7th, is an outright Marxist socialist and a virtual communist attempt to supplant our Republic system and our capitalist economy, in a manner that can only result in the destruction of both. Offering an extraordinary, unprecedented level of government intrusion, a “massive government intervention” in her words, AOC’s plan isn’t simply going to transform our lives, rather it will smash our way of life, through a mass de-population scheme, that Americans ignore at our own peril.

 

Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal sensationalizes and magnifies the imagined impending doom from climate change, and yet, the plan actually addresses very few solutions for anything climate related. Instead, the plan has latched on to climate change, in utopian fashion, and a ruse that offers everything under the sun as a new right, from ice-cream for everyone to a right to get a government purchased pony, or so it does seem. She and her ilk have opportunistically seized upon the issue to justify seizing the United States economy and implementing full-blown socialism and the most Left-wing agenda in American history.

 

Branding the plan as a kind of “Marshall Plan” and lifting a page from Bill McKibben’s 2016 article in ‘The New Republic’, one finds free Medicare — may as well call it “Medicaid” for all — free education, high-speed rails to replace air travel, a federal jobs guarantee, codified family leave, a national union, income paid to those unwilling to work and rebuilding every structure in the nation to meet new environmental regulations. The plan closely follows the failed socialist “Leap Manifesto” advocated by Canada’s Leftists, anti-capitalists, and eco-socialists, such as Naomi Klein, who once wrote “shredding the free-market ideology that has dominated the global economy for more than three decades” was the only way to combat climate change.

 

At the heart of the New Communists’ plan is a focus on renewable energy and the notion that they can move the nation completely away from the use of fossil fuel over the next decade. Electricity would triple in cost, and gasoline could easily rise to $6 per gallon, or more, just to reach fifty percent renewable energy, according to many independent studies including the Heritage Foundation. If actually implemented, their plan will economically cripple the United States, even if it was gradually implemented over the next thirty years.

 

What happens to the former workers in the fossil fuel industry? Will wind-farming be able to absorb their numbers in a cost efficient manner? AOC’s plan does call for a “fair and just transition for all communities and workers.” Ha! I can barely contain my excitement, as I hear this coming from the same party that gave us the failed Obamacare.

 

As noted by Robert Bryce, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute: “FDR, Sam Rayburn and others who pushed for rural electrification back in the 1930s did so because they wanted lower-cost electricity for rural customers. The (Green New Deal) will result in massive increases in energy costs for consumers across the country. It will require covering vast swaths of rural America with wind turbines and transmission lines at the very time that states from Maine to California are rejecting those same projects.”

 

It is not hard to imagine that many households will be hard-pressed to choose between freezing in the winter, buying groceries or paying their mortgages. America will see a sharp rise in homelessness, if such a plan is ever passed, especially considering homelessness has risen steadily, since 1980, and its numbers are now higher than during the Great Depression.

 

Will government be able to prevent them from starving to death by opening “soup kitchens”?

 

Thank God there isn’t enough support in the Senate to pass this fantasy legislation, mimicking Mao’s catastrophic Great Leap Forward, that is advocated by the nation’s red, radical Democrats, at the moment. Such will not always be the case unless we can stop the trend that exhibits 51 percent of Americans age 18 to 29 now view socialism and even communism favorably, with 60 percent of Democrats holding these radical beliefs.

 

Once thought to be a fringe policy idea, AOC’s plan has given climate change legislation significant momentum in recent months. At least 40 members of the House have stated they support the Green New Deal, and every Democratic presidential candidate supports most or all of the plan, from Senators Cory Booker (NJ) to Kamala Harris (CA) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass) to Representative Tulsi Gabbard [Daily Caller & The Hill] (HA).  And potential Democratic candidate, Bernie Sanders (VT) has also thrown his support behind it.

 

I wonder how much Tulsi is going to love her train ride to Hawaii?

 

This sort of transition would essentially nationalize the economy and force the abandonment of huge swaths of capital, which could not be redirected anywhere else; however, every resource, nearly all labor and all production would be diverted from its current use to an agenda determined by government planners and overlords. Much of America would be impoverished overnight, if any such plan ever becomes “law”, and that’s no exaggeration.

 

These wild-eyed communists suggest that throwing money at these projects will ensure their success, but most of America will not easily fall in line to pay the $6.6 trillion annual price-tag, that is three times the amount the federal government collects in tax revenues and thirty-four percent of the U.S.’s entire Gross Domestic Product. It will more than likely require deadly force to redirect such a massive amount of the nation’s wealth, if, Heaven forbid, the Democrat’s ever gain so much power.

 

The New Green Communists’ are unwilling to be truthful about their resolution. Current technologies and opportunity costs would be overwhelmed by this proposal, resulting in a systemic collapse and mass shortages and a scarcity of food. It may read like it offers a wonderful world for all, by emulating Venezuela’s Constitution and enshrining all sorts of “rights”, but it essentially shreds the U.S. Constitution and impedes and suppresses individual liberty, and it reduces each American to “equality” in the lowest common denominator in extreme poverty. It is a miserable proposal that will result in millions of Americans being murdered or starved to death, in order to ensure its success and perpetual power for its Democratic Party creators, under a totalitarian socialist state.

 

And any American Patriot should be prepared to fight any such plan from ever becoming “law” to his death — for any way one chooses to view it, death goes hand in hand with the New Greed Deal.

 

By Justin O. Smith

_________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’


By John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 15, 2019

Rose sent this to me via Facebook Messenger. This is a chain email. Chain emails are notorious for degrees of stretching the truth to downright just deceiving. The object is to spread the message of the chain email to as many readers as possible. Depending on the intended goal of a chain email, a carrot or a stick is employed to spur on chain email dissemination. A carrot might read something like: Send this to five people and God will bless you with prosperity. A stick may look like: If you read this, you must send this to five people or your life will be cursed with misery. OR a neutral carrot as in the chain email I’m about to share that reads: “Please Pass This On or Not!

 

As a rule, I NEVER pass on chain emails. But if I read one that bugs me, I enjoy exposing it. AND if I read one that has an element of truth, but has stretched or a little distorted facts – I like to show the better reality. Such is the case of a Chain Email sent to me via Facebook Messenger by a Facebook friend.

 

The theme of this Chain Email is that the growing Muslim population via migrants, refugees, immigrants and birth is Islamizing the United Kingdom. The truth is Britain’s Multiculturalist Left is so bent on accommodating its growing Muslim population that Islamic Culture is harming the Judeo-Christian-Western foundations of the United Kingdom’s original population. Think about it! The UK still has an Established Church and yet it is a hate-crime for a British Christian to defend their faith from Islamic doctrines contrary to Christian doctrines in public writings or public speech. Why? Such a Christian defense might (ACTUALLY PROBABLY) will insult a Muslim’s faith. AND by observation we know how significant Muslim populations react when they sense insult by non-Muslims. THEY RIOT, RAMPAGE and in some cases embark on murder or rape (mere examples).

 

Below is the Chain Email with my commentary in bold text.

 

JRH 2/15/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

**************

[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA

Posted by Rose Reed Brown

Via Facebook Messenger

Discovered: 2/13/19

 

So, England doesn’t like the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel! Imagine that!

I thought this might give you a better understanding of the insidiousness of Hegira [Blog Editor: Islamizing Medina – 620 – 622 AD AND Hegira-Jihad Emigration]; that’s the takeover of a nation without going to war. Don’t think for a moment that America is not a target or that there are no American cities where Islamic and Sharia victories and takeovers have already occurred. It’s time for border control, or start planning for a very big goodbye to the American way of life!

Here’s what has already happened to England within a few years of opening their borders without any entry control:

How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

Mayor of London … MUSLIM [Sadiq Khan 2016-Present]

Mayor of Birmingham … MUSLIM [Mahmood Hussain (2002–2003), Chauhdry Abdul Rashid (2008–2009) & Shafique Shah (2014–2015)]

Mayor of Leeds … MUSLIM [Mohammed Iqbal will be the 113th Lord Mayor of Leeds (2006)] 

Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM [Salas R. Kiani(1999-2000), Yusuf Jan-Virmani (2005-06), Mohammed Khan (2008-09) and Zamir Khan (2012-13)]

Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM [Magid Magid (2018 – Present)]

Mayor of Oxford .. MUSLIM [Mohammed Abbasi (2014-15) and Mohammed Altaf-Khan (2016-17)]

Mayor of Luton [List Doc Download] …. MUSLIM [Mukunda Bhusan Guha (1991–92), Mohammed Ashraf (1995–96), Masood Akhtar (1997–98), Raja Mohammed Saleem (1999-2000 & 2002-03), Waheed Akbar (2000-01), Kazi Haji Abid Hussain (2005–06), Lakhbir Singh (2008–09), Mohammed Riaz Butt (2009–10), Mohammed Farooq (2014–15), Tahir Khan (2016–17) and Naseem Ayub (2018-Present)]

Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM [Riaz Ahmad (2002-03), Abdul Jabbar (2005-05), Shoab Akhtar (2008-09), Fida Hussain (2014-15), Ateeque Ur-Rehman (2015-16), Shadab Qumer (2017-18) and Javid Iqbal (2018-Present)]

Mayor of Rochdale …. MUSLIM [Sultan Ali (2003-04), Zulfiqar Ali (2010-11) and Mohammed Zaman (2018-Present)]

All the following achieved by just 4 million Muslims [According to gov.uk in 2018: 3,372,966]  out of the 66 million population:

Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques [According to Daily Mail 2018: 1500 Mosques]

Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts [American Thinker 8/6/18: 130 – Daily Mail 6/4/18: 30-85 as in too secretive to enumerate – The Guardian 2/18/18: estimates range from 30 to 85 or more]

Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils [The best I could determine, a Sharia Court and a Sharia Council are one and the same. Quote from news.co.uk:

“Controversial Sharia councils or courts, how they fit in with the British legal system and how they treat women, are at the centre of two Government inquiries.”]

Muslims Only No-Go Areas Across The UK [Gatestone Institute (2/3/15) definition: “No-go zones can be defined as Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas.” There are no government cordoned off as a No-Go Zone, rather the designation is by word of mouth based on non-Muslim fear. Here is a list provided by the same Gatestone Institute:

 

Birmingham: Bordesley Green (includes Small Heath) (73.9%); Hodge Hill (includes areas of Saltley and Ward End) (41.5%); Ladywood (35.2%); Lozells and East Handsworth (48.9%); Nechells (43.5%); Sparkbrook (includes Sparkhill) (70.2%); Washwood Heath (includes Alum Rock) (77.3%).

 

Blackburn with Darwen: Audley (68.7%); Bastwell (85.3%); Corporation Park (62.6%); Little Harwood (51.9%); Queen’s Park (51.5%); Shear Brow (77.7%); Wensley Fold (39.8%)

 

Bolton (Greater Manchester): Crompton (32.7 %); Great Lever (36.6%); Halliwell (27.9%); Rumworth (51.8%)

 

Bradford (West Yorkshire): Bowling and Barkerend (45.8%); Bradford Moor (72.8%); City (57.3%); Great Horton (42.8%); Heaton (55.9%); Keighley Central (51.2%); Little Horton (58.0%); Manningham (75.0%); Toller (76.1%)

 

Brent: Barnhill (23.3%); Dollis Hill (31.3%); Dudden Hill (23.5%); Harlesden (21.8%); Stonebridge (28.2%)

 

Dewsbury (West Yorkshire): Dewsbury South (including Savile Town) (43.8%); Dewsbury West (46.7%)

 

Leeds: Gipton and Harehills (33.2%)

 

Leicester: Charnwood (38.7%); Coleman (39.7%); Spinney Hills (69.6%); Stoneygate (50.2%)

 

London Borough of Enfield: Edmonton Green (29.1%); Haselbury (25.7%); Jubilee (24.1%); Lower Edmonton (24.1%); Ponders End (29.0%); Upper Edmonton (26.4%)

 

London Borough of Tower Hamlets: Bethnal Green South (45.7%); Bromley-by-Bow (48.7%); East India and Lansbury (42.9%); Limehouse (35.5%); Mile End and Globe Town (34.3%); Mile End East (45.9%); Shadwell (46.7%); Spitalfields and Banglatown (38.6%); St Dunstan’s and Stepney Green (48.7%); Weavers (30.3%); and Whitechapel (42.4%).

 

London Borough of Newham: Boleyn (40.5%); East Ham Central (39.6%); East Ham North (50.1%); Green Street East (49.1%); Green Street West (50.4%); Little Ilford (44.8%); Manor Park (45.4%); Wall End (33.9%)

 

London Borough of Redbridge: Clementswood (42.7%); Cranbrook (36.6%); Goodmayes (33.5%); Loxford (46.0%); Mayfield (34.6%); Newbury (29.4%); Seven Kings (31.3%); Valentines (40.0%)

 

London Borough of Waltham Forest: Forest (31.9%); Lea Bridge (32.3%); Leyton (30.2%); Markhouse (32.4%)

 

Luton: Biscot (64.6%); Dallow (includes parts of Bury Park) (61.6%); Saints (51.1%)

 

Manchester: Cheetham (43.3%); Longsight (53.8%); Rusholme (37.9%); Whalley Range (32.7%)

 

Oldham: Coldhurst (64.2%); Medlock Vale (32.3%); St Mary’s (58.7%); Werneth (68.2%)

 

Pendle: Bradley (45.7%); Brierfield (38.8%); Walverden (47.1%); Whitefield (69.8%)

 

Rochdale: Central Rochdale (52.4%); Milkstone and Deeplish (67.1%)

 

Slough: Baylis and Stoke (44.7%); Central (40.6%); Chalvey (37.2%)

 

Westminster: Church Street (42.0%); Harrow Road (24.1%); Hyde Park (25.1%); Queen’s Park (26.3%); Westbourne (33.1%)

 

Wycombe: Bowerdean (35.6%); Oakridge and Castlefield (45.7%)]

[Blog Editor: I cannot confirm any of the statistics below. Knowing chain emails my suspicion is at best inaccurate and at worst fabricated to support the actual culture clash that indeed exists between Western Culture and Islamic Culture. Here’s a quote from a EuroNews title, “Which European countries offer the most social benefits to migrants?” The date 9/16/15. Scroll down to “UNITEDKINGDOM”:

 

  • Accommodation tends to be private, paid for by the state.

 

  • Weekly allowance of 36.95 pounds (50.35 euros) per person to cover basic needs including food. Small extra amounts available for pregnant women, babies and young children.

 

  • Not normally allowed to work.

 

  • If granted asylum: same benefits as British nationals.]

 

Muslim Women…78% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing

Muslim Men…63% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing

 

[Blog Editor: It is my humble opinion that most Fact Checking websites are too Left Wing to be reliable in fact checking Conservative perspectives (of which Snopes – but limited to – is among the worst). The most even handed Fact Checking website in my opinion is Truth Or Fiction. Incidentally, Truth Or Fiction (TOF) places this Chain Email and its numerous variations as “Mostly Fiction” yet with some truth. TOF quotes the BBC on Muslim unemployment in relation the “Muslim Invasion” Muslim stats in the Chain Email:

 

… And it’s not clear where the Muslim Invasion email’s claims that 78% of Muslim women don’t work, and that 63% of Muslim men don’t work and receive government benefits like housing assistance. Research shows that those claims are incorrect — but U.K. Muslims are generally worse-off economically than other groups. Forty-six percent of Muslims live in the bottom 1o% of local authority districts that are considered “most depraved.” Additionally, employment rates are higher among Muslims than other religious groups, but not as high as the Muslim Invasion email claims, a 2015 study found:

 

One of the areas of concern the report highlights is how well these qualifications turn into employment, particularly for females. 29% of Muslim women between the ages of 16 and 24 are in employment, compared to approximately half the general population. For the ages group 25 – 49 the numbers show 57% of Muslim women in employment compared with 80% of women overall.

 

This raises a number of questions that were posed at the report’s launch as areas that need extra exploration – why are educated Muslim woman not carrying on into employment? Possible reasons cited being cultural influences encouraging them to have a family and stay at home, racism and prejudice in the workplace and/or their qualifications not being from institutions of a high enough standard to appeal to employers. The report notes that Muslim students are less likely to attend Russell Group universities.

 

TOS does not specifically address the full free benefits unemployed Muslims receive in the claims of the Chain Email. According to Britannica.com all legal residents in the UK (i.e. citizens and non-citizens) receive the same benefits (this would include Muslims):

 

The National Health Service (NHS) provides comprehensive health care throughout the United Kingdom. The NHS provides medical care through a tripartite structure of primary care, hospitals, and community health care. The main element in primary care is the system of general practitioners (family doctors), who provide preventive and curative care and who refer patients to hospital and specialist services. All consultations with a general practitioner under the NHS are free.

 

The other major types of primary medical care are dentistry and pharmaceutical and opthalmic services. These are the only services of the NHS for which charges are levied, though persons under age 16, past retirement, or with low incomes are usually exempt. Everyone else must pay charges that are below the full cost of the services involved.

 

 

Cash benefits

 

… Employers collect the contribution, and there is also an employer contribution. Separate arrangements exist for the self-employed. The revenue from contributions goes into the National Insurance Fund.

 

Insured individuals are entitled to unemployment compensation, cash benefits during sickness or disability, and a retirement pension. There are also benefits for individuals injured in work-related accidents and for widows. Whether or not they receive an insurance benefit, all are eligible for a noncontributory benefit. Employees who lose their jobs through no fault of their own receive lump-sum redundancy, or severance, payments, whose cost is met in part by their employers and in part from a general levy on employers.

 

The major noncontributory benefits, paid out of general tax revenues, offer poverty relief to individuals and families whose income and savings fall below some prescribed level. The benefit of last resort is income support (formerly called the supplementary benefit); it is payable to individuals whose entitlement to insurance benefits has been exhausted or has left them with a very low income and to those who never had any entitlement to an insurance benefit. Other means-tested benefits assist low-paid working families with children and help people on low incomes with their housing costs. An important class of noncontributory benefits is not means-tested, the major example being the child benefit, a weekly tax-free payment for each child, usually payable to the mother.

 

… The government also introduced a children’s tax credit to provide additional support to low- and middle-income families. There was a review of the benefit system in 1985 that changed the detailed workings of several benefits in 1988 but left the basic structure intact.

 

Housing

 

During the mid-20th century, local governments developed council houses (public housing estates) throughout the United Kingdom. At public housing’s peak, about 1970, local governments owned 30 percent of all housing in the country. Under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act of 1977 (which amended older legislation), local governments have a statutory obligation in certain circumstances to find housing for homeless families. Partly for that reason, they keep a substantial stock of housing for rent, maintain waiting lists, and allocate housing according to need…

 

 Education

 

Primary and secondary education

 

 

Primary education is free and compulsory from age 5 to 11. Secondary education is organized in a variety of ways for children aged 11 to 19 and is free and compulsory to age 16. In most parts of the United Kingdom, secondary schools are comprehensive; that is, they are open to pupils of all abilities. Pupils may stay on past the minimum school-leaving age of 16 to earn a certificate or take public examinations that qualify them for higher education.

 

The state finances primary and secondary education out of central and local tax revenues. Most expenditures take place at the local level, though about half of local revenues derive from the central government.]

 

Muslim Families…6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!

 

[Blog Editor: Most Fact Checkers debunk the “ONLY,” but that doesn’t mean a substantial amount of UK Public Schools do not serve Islamic ceremonial halal meat even to non-Muslims. Here’s an excerpt from an interesting article on halal meat in UK Public Schools from ParentPower.family examining European Human Rights in relation to halal meat in UK Public Schools (9/10/18):

 

In July of this year, Lancashire Council became the first in the UK to ban unstunned halal meat from being served in schools. Not all providers of halal meat will not stun the animal prior to slaughter, but The Lancashire Council of Mosques argued that the halal slaughter process “must avoid all forms of stunning.” In addition, “the slaughterman must personally invoke the name of Allah prior to every slaughter.”

 

freedom of information request to Liverpool Council in 2010 asked how many schools served halal meat in the Liverpool council area. The Council responded by saying that they did not hold this information centrally. This lack of central information means that nobody knows how many schools are serving halal meat in their canteens. There are certainly schools that only serve halal meat, whilst offering vegetarian alternatives. In some cases parents have not been informed that their children are eating halal meat. One school abandoned plans to serve only halal meat just hours after sending letters announcing the plan after parents complained.

 

Animal welfare is one reason why parents might want to object to halal meat in schools. Halal slaughter is also a religious sacrifice to Allah which means that some parents will have religious objections.

 

READ THE REST

 

Friends that’s way TOO MUCH Islamic influence in a Western Culture nation that serving Islamic ceremonial halal meat is even a consideration. Especially since Islamic revered writings condemn non-Muslims (Christians and Jews by name – the “People of the Book” respect is abrogated by the Quran attributed Muhammad’s Medina-recited surahs) as insulting infidels (aka kafir) if they do not submit to the superiority of Allah and Islam.]

 

…and we (the USA) and (CANADA) can’t decide on an immigration policy???

Read all of this and pass on. This can’t happen to us. Whatever it takes, we got to band together. Deport ALL MUSLIMS.

One of the ways to combat this is to keep circulating information such as this e-mail around our United States and Canada to inform the uninformed who mainly only listen and read the left leaning US and Canadian radio/TV and newspapers. I have not seen this in the US or Canadian media…have you?

Please Pass This On or Not!

____________________

Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’

By John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 15, 2019

___________________

[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA

 

Chain Email shared by Rose on Facebook Messenger.

 

Edited by John R. Houk with commentary

 

Kids Chasing Paradise


Did you know Muslim children all over the world are being taught and trained to kill non-Muslims – ALSO – all over the world? Check out this info from KidsTheMovie.com and the trailer sponsored by the Clarion Project.

 

JRH 2/13/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Kids Chasing Paradise

 

Kids is a powerful new documentary film that exposes the radicalization of children by Islamist extremists.

 

FILM SYNOPSIS

 

Childhood is supposed to be a special time in a person’s life. A time to grow and play, to explore and learn about the world. All children deserve a peaceful upbringing and the opportunity to pursue a meaningful life.

 

But today, Islamist states and organizations are systematically indoctrinating the next generation of kids to embrace violence and hatred.

 

These children cannot help but internalize these values and become filled with hate. At worst, they commit acts of terror.

 

This radicalization is also happening at home, in the West. Islamists are using new methods to reach a broader audience and lure Western teenagers to buy into their poisonous ideology.

 

Kids: Chasing Paradise is a powerful new film that takes an unflinching look at the brutal exploitation of youth by extremists worldwide. The documentary features compelling personal stories of children, who are actively influenced by extremists, and their families, and showcases activists and experts who confront this growing global threat.

 

CHARACTERS

 

FILMMAKERS

 

SUBSCRIBE: BE THE FIRST TO GET KIDS: CHASING PARADISE AND OTHER CLARION PROJECT CONTENT – Sign up to our Newsletter

 

VIDEO: Kids: Chasing Paradise – Official Trailer – Spring 2019

 

Posted by Clarion Project

Published on Feb 11, 2019

______________________

© 2019 Clarion Project Inc. All Rights Reserved

 

The Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund) is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization dedicated to educating both policy makers and the public about the growing phenomenon of Islamic extremism. The Clarion Project is committed to working towards safeguarding human rights for all peoples.

 

Making Islamophobia a Crime


If the Dem Party and that Party’s inherent Marxist-Socialist agenda of Multiculturalism has it way in the U.S., America will limit Free Speech as it appears imminent in the UK.

JRH 2/12/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Making Islamophobia a Crime

 

By Bill Warner

Feb 10 2019

Political Islam

 

The APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) some members of the UK Parliament who have issued a document that defines Islamophobia. Their goal is to make “Islamophobia” a crime. Islam is defined as whatever Muslims want it to be.

 

The APPG claims free speech will not be affected as long as the speaker in question does not cause harm. “Harm” is defined as anything that offends a Muslim, even if it is a fact.

 

Although the document is only a committee report, many British city councils are implementing the report as law. This is totalitarianism. This is Islam.

 

https://youtu.be/Q39uN2z2ejI 

 

____________________

© 2007-2019 CSPI, LLC. all rights reserved. 

 

Political Islam

 

Political Islam About Page

 

What is Islam?

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

CSPI

 

Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to enlightening the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on the works of Dr. Bill Warner.

 

Our Mission

 

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

The Five Principles

 

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is READ THE REST

 

Us vs Them


Justin Smith tackles the existence of political gridlock in America today, blaming it on the irreconcilable differences between the Dems and GOP. Justin quite correctly points to the gridlock as the Dems have lurched toward Marxism sanitized under the term – Democratic Socialism. Just like the Dems like to call themselves Progressives to disguise their current Marxist agenda, telling Americans that a Democratic Socialist is a Socialism for the people.

 

Spoiler alert: Justin believes (and I agree) that the Two-Party system as it exists today makes America ungovernable. When America is ungovernable, what will it lead to?

 

JRH 2/12/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

***************

Us vs Them

The Republic Hangs In The Balance: Communists, Devils and SOBs

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/10/2019 9:07 PM

 

Most of the American public feels that the future of the Republic hangs in the balance. “Four more years of Trump… and it will be the end of us…” they say. Or… “I hope those Democrats don’t get into office; did you see those taxes they’re proposing?”

 

We are programmed to see the world that way. It’s “Us vs. Them.” You just have to decide which “Us” you’re part of.

 

But what if you’ve chosen the wrong “Us”? What if neither the Republicans nor the Democrats will save the Republic?

 

We’re pretty well stuck with the Two-Party System for Now — the Choice We made Despite George Washington’s admonishment against parties — until we can kill the parties off, DISCARD THEM LIKE OLD BROKEN DOWN SHOES.

 

America needs to kill the two party system and simply allow the best man or woman with the best ideas and vision for the nation win the day. But that will not be an easy thing, since parties determine the ballot; however, it can be done, if the people will it so.

 

Short of this, patriotic Americans must help both parties purge their ranks of anti-American communists, socialists, Muslims and globalists, who do not work within the confines of the U.S. Constitution and do not protect and defend it and our nation’s Founding Principles. It’s past time we make it known that the ideas of Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao have absolutely no place in America’s culture.

 

I am afraid it’s going to take a civil war to drive this point home. Our divide has never been so great, all due to one side’s abandoning the vision and the mechanisms placed in our system, by Our Founding Fathers.

 

We have arrived at the day described by Washington, when men and women place party allegiance over allegiance and loyalty to America. But it’s even more serious than many can know. We have allowed a large segment of the population to be indoctrinated by the advocates and progenitors of Marxist Socialism, a foreign ideology that is antithetical to our Founding Principles, acting through sedition and treason against our nation; and this large segment is now represented by the Democratic Party, just as RINOs are its agents in the Republican Party.

 

Communism has long infiltrated our nation and both parties [Dems], from its spawning in 1848, and it seeks our subjugation and the end of individual liberty.

 

So, as we proceed rather warily and regard the future for America’s Children, when You select a candidate for any office, try to get Your community on the same page to vote for someone — A Person, A Statesman and Not A Party — who holds proven views that support the greatest economic prosperity through an individual’s own efforts and free choices; who supports known ideas, virtues and principles that allow for the greatest realm of individual liberty possible.

 

Work like hell to get them elected.

 

And then push all elected representatives to rescind superfluous laws and bad or illegitimate law that impedes any God-given right or the Bill of Rights, and make these legislators ask the following before each bill is voted upon.

 

Does this bill help all Americans? Or does it harm more Americans than it helps?

 

Does this bill create real potential for greater prosperity? Or does it impede economic growth?

 

Does this bill take anything away from individual liberty? Too many bills do this very thing simply due to the fact they fall under the auspices of the government; by this alone, Congress should be passing VERY FEW “Laws” each year, instead of thousands of new laws that not one citizen in the nation can possibly know or obey in their entirety.

 

There are only two things worth fighting for. You are either protecting your stuff or you are protecting yourself. But against whom?

 

Those devils in the Republican party? Or those SOBs, the Democrats?

 

The Democrats are vying with each other to see who can come up with a new tax, likely to be seen at the 70% mark, to take away our property; we surely don’t want them in charge.

 

But wait… the Republicans increased spending by some $500 billion over two years… and added $2 trillion to the federal debt. Where did they think that money would come from?

 

Where is the “Us” worthy of support? Where is the “Them” that should be annihilated? Well … for starters we definitely can say it is those illiberal and intolerant Communists, Socialists, Fascists and Muslims within our borders, who should be annihilated; since they have just about forced our nation to Her knees as they repeatedly and often attack our Founding Judeo-Christian Principles, Our Constitution and Our Freedoms and Liberties and God-given Rights.

 

Tell Your Congressmen and Senators, that You would PREFER THEY DO NOTHING RATHER THAN PASS BAD, ILLEGITIMATE LAW THAT FURTHER ERODES OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.

 

Make this a plan for ELECTION 2020!!!

 

~ Justin O Smith

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the /editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

The End of the Line


Justin Smith views warnings of an imminent economic crisis from billionaire investors. AND the so-called Green New Deal may make the predictions even worse.

JRH 2/10/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

******************

The End of the Line

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 2/9/2019 5:00 PM

 

The United States’ economy has surpassed all normal ebbs and flows, corrections, by approximately five years, since on average in each past cycle it rose for 56 months before collapsing. We’re about five years past that point and our economy is only now “cooling”. We’re just about due for another economic recession, if not a collapse that makes 2008 look small. We’re at the end of the line.

The U.S. spends almost a third of its revenue on interest payments alone, and it doesn’t seem like it can afford to pay much more.

In the short decade since 2008, the national debt, ever on the rise, has jumped from $10.6 trillion to $22 trillion. It also comes with a deficit that’s currently over $1 trillion currently. The interest payments alone may be forming a “black hole” from which the U.S. may never escape.

These facts alone should raise concern in any interested observer.

 

And now we see twenty-nine year old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a product of the Puerto Rican Enlightenment and a Bronx resident, and other red, radical socialists like her in the House of Representatives, promising Pie-In-The-Sky Utopia for everyone. This makes her a danger to herself, her constituents and the nation, since she believes there isn’t any problem that a government program cannot solve, and she is already advocating for Medicare for all, a job guarantee, free college tuition, a green infrastructure program, and a squeeze the rich tax plan (70% for those making over $10 million).

 

Most political pundits say, “It will never pass … it’s crazy … it will harm the economy.” But, crazy plans that hurt the economy just might stand a chance at passing, since just over half the population in its entirety, and 51% of all Millennials, now have an acceptable view of socialism, some even embracing communism.

 

When existing laws of the land cause bankruptcy and chaos, people seem to look to legislate even more absurd laws, which is precisely how the first New Deal was pushed through Congress, during the panic and despair of the 1932 elections. And the New Deal gave President Franklin D. Roosevelt carte blanche to enact a series of costly programs.

 

A good guess is that the next economic crisis will be severe and long-lasting, too, as stocks fall hard and the economy goes into a deep recession.

 

“How did we get here”, one young lady recently asked me. Short answer: America has been guided to this point, by the consequences of the Federal Reserve Act, centralized banking, regulations, currency manipulation, devaluing the U.S. dollar, socialist initiatives in Congress to fast-track globalism, unfunded debt, monetized debt and acts of anti-American national sovereignty on both sides of the aisle who are intent on tearing apart the Founders’ vision and U.S. sovereignty, in order to pave the way for the globalists and their vision of a “new world order”.

 

The enemies of America, both foreign and domestic, have been working towards this goal for the past 120 years, and they have been working tirelessly and consistently towards leveling America’s power and wealth to the point She can be managed and coerced or forced to submit to the global agenda of the few power elite, the oligarchs of the world,

 

Mainstream media almost never hype a financial crisis, so it’s significant when they do. But when billionaires are sounding the alarm, you might want to pay close attention.

At least two billionaires are doing just that, starting with Baupost Group’s Seth Klarman. Baupost Group is a $28 billion hedge fund, and Klarman normally positions himself out of the limelight. His fund is only open to private investors, so he has little incentive to promote his brand to the public.

But recently, he felt the need to write a warning to investors about the global debt, with specific reference to the U.S., according to Sovereign Man:

In a 22-page letter to his investors, Klarman warned that government debt levels, particularly in the US (where debt exceeds GDP), could lead to the next global financial crisis.

The seeds of the next major financial crisis (or the one after that) may well be found in today’s sovereign debt levels,” he wrote.

 

Even ignoring economic history, there are signs everywhere, as nearly every major asset class around the world, from stocks and bonds to real estate, is selling at nearly an all-time high at prices that defy common sense. This suggests the possibility of a big recession and market correction just before the 2020 election, giving the socialists a much needed crisis that could catapult them into a majority in both houses of Congress. And that’s why we should all be praying that if any coming recession must come, let it hit soon, so it can be properly addressed before it becomes a major election issue.

In the same letter, Klarman continued: “There is no way to know how much debt is too much, but America will inevitably reach an inflection point whereupon a suddenly more skeptical debt market will refuse to continue to lend to us at rates we can afford…

Since the U.S. spends almost a third of its revenue on interest payments alone, it doesn’t seem like it can afford to pay much more.

And Klarman isn’t the only billionaire expressing unease. At the World Economic Forum [Blog Editor: WEFORUM – Globalization 4.0; Breitbart-Pompeo-Nationalism; New American-Merkel-Communist China-Globalist Agenda; & TheGatewayPundit-Ted Malloch-Criticizing Davos] in Davos, Switzerland, Ray Dalio, founder of the world’s largest hedge fund, said that debt would be to blame for the next downturn, which he believes will be bigger than the Great Depression.

“The biggest issue is that there is only so much one can squeeze out of a debt cycle and most countries are approaching those limits”.

You might think the U.S. government would do everything to curb this problem, but Uncle Sam’s total debt is rapidly approaching $22 trillion, and according to the Congressional Budget Office’s latest ten-year projection, it will be more than $33 trillion by 2029, with $1 trillion annual deficits set to begin again and stay above that for as far as the fiscal eye can see.

Skyrocketing debt, check. Deficit to match, check. Or will it be checkmate?

Although I’ve stated this twice before in this piece. let me reiterate — The U.S. spends almost a third of its revenue on interest payments alone.  America and Her people cannot afford to pay much more.

WE’VE ARRIVED AT THE END OF THE LINE.

~ Justin O Smith

____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith