Blog Archives

Expose Islam’s True Ideology


Islam Spread by Sword

Dajjal has posted two comments on the post by Norma Zager entitled “Two Roads Converge for Mankind”. This particular post was located at my NCCR blog (I have two others). Norma’s essay very eloquently writes about the idiocy of tolerating the hate and violence that so often emerges from the theopolitical religion known as Islam.

 

Norma’s essay inspired some thoughts from Dajjal which is a pseudonym by a blogger that is quite the expert on the nuanced details inherent in Islam. Dajjal can be quite harsh in exposing Islam’s nature to an incredulous West. That is the obvious reason for a pseudonym. Sooo many Counterjihad writers exposing Islam are often the recipients of death threats and murders by adherents of – coughthe religion of peace.

 

Often Dajjal writes about Islamic concepts as if the reader is on the same level of understanding that he possesses. And Dajjal in an oft times humorous fashion will use a play on words or the lack of capitalization to show disrespect for the religion that does not respect non-Muslim people and non-Muslim concepts that reject Islam. In the process of editing Dajjal’s comment I will endeavor to leave the wordplays intact and provide links to Islamic concepts that at least I have to look up to understand the context. Also the title of this post is derived by me based on my understanding of the Dajjal comment. Dajjal did not grace these important thoughts with his own title.

 

JRH 10/22/14

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

Expose Islam’s True Ideology

 

By Dajjal

October 19, 2014 at 5:32 PM

 

S**t impacts the blades as a consequence of one fatal error: tolerance of evil. We foolishly allowed Communists to hold high government office, even Vice President and to participate in nuclear research leading to the atomic bomb. Thus Russia was able to obtain deadly knowledge, construct their own destructive devices and share with China.

 

Because we let the enemy get the bomb, we dared not contest them directly when they attacked Korea by proxy. Neither could we confront China in Vietnam.

 

Vietnam held crucial classes in war and victory. We failed to learn the lessons of denial of sanctuary, seizing and holding territory and persistence.

 

We failed to apply those lessons in Afghanistan and Iraq, wasting precious blood and treasure for naught but show: the appearance of doing something.

 

Worse yet, we failed to learn the lesson of the Crusades, Poitiers, Lepanto [pp. 1 & 2] and Vienna. We vainly imagined that wars are won by killing men and destroying material, ignoring the ideas that drive those men to attack.

 

Only Allah has the right to be worshipped. Allah alone has the right to rule and govern, his legislative power is exclusive. Muslims must secure Allah’s rights by their swords, failing to make the endeavor condemns them to Hellfire. Jihad guarantees admission to Allah’s celestial bordello. While Muslims believe that s**t, heads will roll and blood will flow regardless of pinprick air attacks. Even if you decimate their ranks, the remnant will regroup, reproduce, rearm and resume their attacks in the fullness of time.

 

Victory will not be obtained without the complete destruction of Islamic Iman [Blog Editor: At first glance I thought “Iman” was a typo of Imam. Now I am not so sure. See HERE and HERE]. Open “The Quranic Concept of War” [PDF photocopy of original book] to page 58 and read through page 60 to obtain a clue.

 

We will pay the price of failure of Crusaders & colonizers to destroy Iman. We will pay the price for not nuking Islam off the face of the earth in the aftermath of the Accursed Abomination. It will be a high price in blood, treasure and grief.

 

If you believe that God commissioned you to conquer the world and establish his kingdom; if you believe that you will be blessed if you undertake the mission and damned if you don’t, what will you do. What are Muslims doing? Get a clue before it is too late, before Iran obtains nukes and delivery systems (See Also HERE).

 

Victory will be obtained only by some combination of apostasy and extinction. We can work on the apostasy part, making mujahideen extinct is the government’s duty.

 

Dajjal Thoughts Continue

October 19, 2014 at 5:55 PM

 

The entire house of cards rests on the reputation of Kauthar, AKA Muhammad (See HERE and HEREBlog Editor: These links are intended to show a positive theology of Islam; however if you view this with the idiocy of Muhammad being the perfect human there is little-to-zero positive), held up as the best and greatest of men. His sunnah reveals the truth which we need to popularize. Moe was demon possessed. He was suicidal. He was homicidal. He lusted after infants. He raped prisoners of war whom he made captive.

 

Dramatize the sunnah in a series of full length docu-dramas. Put them on large and small screens all over the world; show Muslims the truth about their role model.

 

The producer of “Innocence of Muslims” claims to have two hours in the can. Get it published and distributed. Ali Sina and Mossab Yusuf (SP?) have screenplays. At least one more is already on the shelf. Get them produced and distributed. Show Muslims exactly what they emulate and worship.

________________________

One can find Dajjal scholarship at Crusader’s Armory.

 

Edited by John R. Houk

All linked texts are by the Editor

 

© Dajjal

Two Roads Converge for Mankind


Vicious Mad Dog 2

 

If spent any time at all reading this blog you would be fully aware that I have a Counterjihad perspective pertaining to Islam.

 

This Norma Zager essay is obviously about the rabid nature inherent in Islam especially toward Israel but now becoming a huge factor for violence in the USA as well. The interesting thing is Norma’s essay does not mention “Islam” or “Muslim” one single time in this essay. This is a very astute piece of writing by Norma.

 

Here is an example from Norma’s essay in order for you to see what I mean – tell me you can’t figure out what she is writing about:

 

We seem to have adapted to the acceptance we must live side by side with evil like a neighbor that trashes his house and lets his dog run wild to bite children at play, and you are simply grateful you are not the one living next door.

 

Of course when his trash and dog travel through the area and land on your lawn, it is a horse of a different pastel altogether.

 

JRH 10/19/14

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Two Roads Converge for Mankind

“DEAL!  For Goodness Still Possesses the Winning Hand!”

 

By Norma Zager

Sent: 10/18/2014 9:08 PM

 

Learning to live in this frightening new world – one that reasonable men would scarcely embrace – is a monumental feat. Faced with two roads, is humanity to take the one less taken or march backward in time to the year 600 A.D. at warp speed?

 

We seem to have adapted to the acceptance we must live side by side with evil like a neighbor that trashes his house and lets his dog run wild to bite children at play, and you are simply grateful you are not the one living next door.

 

Of course when his trash and dog travel through the area and land on your lawn, it is a horse of a different pastel altogether.

 

Most Americans are over the winds of war. We have spent the better part of the last century and the new one talking ourselves into the belief, unless Hitler returns there is no need for bloody battle scenarios. It is no wonder when we have seen innocent American lives and untold treasure wasted and the good we do undone.

 

This misguided and calamitous ideology has led to destruction, 9/11, the Boston Marathon, Fort Hood, and coming soon to a theatre near you, one can only shake in their boots with fear to imagine.

 

The world looks far different than fifty years ago before November 22, 1963.

 

America was then a peaceful village dealing with issues of segregation in the south. Disgusted by news stories of blacks being hosed and chased by dogs, Civil rights workers – blacks and whites – hanging from trees, one couldn’t fathom a sorrier sight in a country so filled with wonderful possibilities.

 

John Kennedy and his brother Robert fought hard for civil rights, yet it took Lyndon Johnson, who knew where all the bodies were buried, to push all the right buttons in Congress and get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed.

 

Hope returned, and America felt it was on the right track and pointed toward the sun.

 

Then came Viet Nam and disgrace, blood and disillusion to the young and Nixon, the reality check where politicians were concerned. Like virgins we awoke to the fact we were no longer unsullied, but in bed with, Lord Help Us, politicians.

 

This is a lesson we too soon forgot to our chagrin, for our elected officials are all the same. Yet now that moment of forgetfulness has cost us dearly.

 

So what do we do now?

 

How do we stop a world rolling downward into hell like a giant snowball on roller skates?

 

Cleopatra Queen of Denial is in the White House, and Congress, well, there are simply no words to describe a sorrier bunch of bozos.

 

We are out there on our own now, on the rockiest seas ever charted by a planet filled with flawed humans.

 

Suddenly we find ourselves in a dilemma of catastrophic proportion, as two species of man populate earth, savages and men of intellect.  Unfortunately, we are discovering that both cannot exist side by side.

 

Man can walk into the future embracing the greatest scientific marvels ever known. The Hadron Collider in Geneva has shown man’s capacity to elevate science and physics to heights previously beyond our reach. A new age of intellectualism – where color, religion and gender become at last insignificant – can arise and lead us toward humankind’s ultimate potential.

 

Or the savages marching backward in time can draw man back into the dark ages where caves once again become the homes of choice.

 

Of course it is easy for reasonable men to decide, but who will make that choice?

 

Who will stop the raging tide of man’s existence down the dark muddy river of extinction?

 

Who will dare rise up to fight the good fight against this malevolence?

 

If there is any hope for the choices that must be made, it lies in the union of reason and humanity. Evil is past any necessity for judgment, it can no longer be disguised but is open and brazen.

 

The enemy is clear, but will good people be wise enough to set aside their differences to rise up and defeat the wicked before their strength becomes unmanageable?

 

It has always been the way of the world that good should overcome evil, but it is also a fact many good men must die in the process.

 

It seems as though the battles get longer and the toll of the good grows higher. Yet, it would seem rational the opposite should occur, but does not. Evil’s proactive posture will always get the jump on good’s reactive nature.

 

They have acted too long and now we need to respond. They have murdered in the most heinous of ways – men, women and children have been slaughtered – so how long will it take until the despicable are defeated? How many must die at the hand of terrorists bent on destruction and death?

 

We know the players, and I beg good people everywhere to get in the game. The sides are easy to choose, all we need is to come to the table and show our hand.

 

To these horrors testing mankind’s future, I say simply, “DEAL,” because I remain certain goodness possesses the winning hand.

______________________

This is the latest in the series “Postcards from America – Postcards from Israel,” a collaboration between Zager and Bussel, a foreign correspondent reporting from Israel.

 

Ari Bussel and Norma Zager collaborate both in writing and on the air in a point-counter-point discussion of all things Israel-related.  Together, they have dedicated the past decade to promoting Israel.

 

© Israel Monitor, September 2014

 

First Published September 9, 2014

Contact:  bussel@me.com

 

Christianity’s Non-Compete Clause


 

Jesus the ONLY Way

 

John R. Houk

© September 11, 2014

 

Here is a great essay by Kenneth Roberts that I found on Political Islam. The central theme is that Islam has a non-compete clause encoded into their holy writings and theology. And Mr. Roberts also takes the next step alluding that Islam is the only major religion with a non-compete clause.

 

I am a Christian so I probably shouldn’t comment definitively on the certainty of other religions accepting the existence of other faiths. However, I do know that Christianity has a non-compete clause also embedded into our Holy writings. The difference between Islam and Christianity is how that encoded non-compete is to be placed into action.

 

Islam overtly utilizes its incomprehensible dualistic theology in which two contradictory Quranic teachings are true as long as Islam is promoted. For example the Quran tells Muslims to treat the People of the Book with respect because these poor ignorant people were followers of Allah but allowed themselves to distort the content of their Holy writings. Contrasting this respect for the People of the Book is the command to kill them for blaspheming against Mohammed the false prophet and blaspheming the faith of Islam by asserting Jesus is both fully human and fully God and is a part of the Trinity which Christians believe is the mystery of three persons that are ONE God. The Islamic solution for this perceived blasphemy is to kill them wherever you find them. Although Islamic dualism is not specifically mentioned in this essay by Ali Sina, the essay demonstrates the reality of Islam toward non-Muslims:

 

Let us compare both sides of Quran:

 

In Surah 73:10 God tells Mohammad to be patient with his opponents, “Be patient with what they say, and part from them courteously”. While in Surah 2:191 God orders him to kill his opponents, “kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from wherever they drove you out.” In Surah 2:256 God tells Mohammad not to impose Islam by force, “There is no compulsion in religion”, Then again in verse 193 He tells his messenger to kill whoever rejects Islam, “Fight them until there is no persecution and the religion is God’s”. In Surah 29:45 God tells Mohammad to speak nicely to people of the Book (Christians and Jews), “Argue with people of the book, other than evil doers, only by means of what are better! and say, we believe in what has been sent down to us and sent down to you. Our God is the same as your God, and we are surrendered to Him.” But in Surah 9:29 Allah tells him to fight the people of the Book, “Fight those who do not believe in God and the last day… and fight People of the Book, who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute by hand, being inferior”.

 

Muhammad gives no justification for this discrepancy in the Quran and the change in Allah’s mood from peaceful to militant and conciliatory to confrontational. Muslim apologists in the West present the kinder verses of the Quran or what is known as the Early Revelation. While Islamic scholars, when have only Muslims as their audience, say that those softer verses of the Quran were abrogated and supplanted by harsher ones. The reason given is, as Al Maudoody puts it, “Mohammad became strong enough to move from the stage of weakness to the stage of Jihad”. READ ENTIRETY (The Contradictory teachings of the Quran; By Ali Sina; found at Harrington Sites – Attributed to FaithFreedom.org but couldn’t find it)

 

The Religion of Peace has collated some Muslim suras that show the Quran requiring violence and/or death for non-Muslims that defy Islamic Supremacism: “What does the Religion of Peace Teach About Violence?

 

Christianity in contrast does not teach human beings to exact violence and death against nonbelievers of Christianity. Rather Christians are to share the Good News of Christ’s deliverance from this dark age by believing that the Blood of Christ exacted on Him by human hands is the Redemption price for Adam and Eve’s failure in selling out to Satan in the Garden of Eden; thus one must believe in Jesus is the Son of God in deity and the son of man via Mary Who died on the Cross, was buried for three days and arose from the grave in bodily form to reside on the Right Hand of God the Father. Unbelief is dealt with in the Last Judgment when the Book of Life is opened to see whose name is written or not written in it. God’s Mercy is extended for that human decision until a person’s dying breath to Believe in Christ Jesus.

 

Unfortunately as the Christian Church became a State Religion, rulers of man exacted punishment on nonbelievers for refusing to believe. That unscriptural punishment included a death sentence and mass genocide in the name of Jesus Christ. However such crimes against humanity is distinctly against the Great Commission of the Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God both coequal with the Father and with the nature of humanity. Taking on a sinless version of human nature in Christ is what makes Redemption from the lost nature of humanity possible in Christ’s Redeeming act.

 

Here are New Testament Scriptures demonstrating Redemption and toleration:

 

13 No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.[a] 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, 15 that whoever believes in Him should not perish but[b] have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

 

18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.” (Jesus talking in John 3: 13-21 NKJV)

 

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love,5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.

 

7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace (Ephesians 1: 3-7 NKJV)

 

3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve.6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time.

 

12 Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. 14 And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty.

 

20 But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming.24 Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. 25 For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that will be destroyed is death.

 

42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. The body is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. 43 It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. 45 And so it is written, “The first man Adam became a living being.”[a] The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.

 

46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual. 47 The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord[b] from heaven. 48 As was the man of dust, so also are those who are made of dust; and as is the heavenly Man, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear[c] the image of the heavenly Man. (Bold text mine - 1 Corinthians 15: 3-8, 12-14, 20-26, 42-49 NKJV)

 

5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7 but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. 9 Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Bold text mine - Philippians 2: 5-11 NKJV)

 

In case you have been too brainwashed to understand the mystery here, verse six proclaims Jesus is equal to God and ergo is God. Verse seven tells us Jesus emptied Himself of those Divine prerogatives as God to become a human being. Verse eight tells us he became a human being to be able to die. And we did Jesus as a man need to die? Because only a human being could remit the spiritual DNA passed to every single human by Adam that had become through disobedience by believing and giving allegiance to Satan in the Garden.

 

6 Now when these things had been thus prepared, the priests always went into the first part of the tabernacle, performing the services. 7 But into the second part the high priest went alone once a year, not without blood, which he offered for himself and for the people’s sins committed in ignorance; 8 the Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing.9 It was symbolic for the present time in which both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make him who performed the service perfect in regard to the conscience—10 concerned only with foods and drinks, various washings, and fleshly ordinances imposed until the time of reformation.

 

11 But Christ came as High Priest of the good things to come,[a] with the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation. 12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, 14 how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? 15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.

 

23 Therefore it was necessary that the copies of the things in the heavens should be purified with these, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.24 For Christ has not entered the holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us; 25 not that He should offer Himself often, as the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood of another— 26 He then would have had to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now, once at the end of the ages, He has appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. 27 And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment, 28 so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time, apart from sin, for salvation. (Hebrews 9: 6-15, 23-28 NKJV)

 

Jesus sets the example of how to treat people in the present time who reject Him. In Jesus’ day Jews and the Samaritans did not get along too well. Samaritans were the descendants of the remnant left in Israel after deportation occurred by Assyrian conquest. These Jews (or really the remnant of the ten-tribe Northern Kingdom) that were left behind were devoid of spiritual leadership plus any Judaic faith they possessed was also corrupted by bad Kings allowing polytheistic religions to be practiced so that the King of Judah still centered in Jerusalem would not inspire rebellion. The Assyrians left these leaderless there to work the land. These remnant Northern Kingdom Hebrews left behind developed a religion that combing Judaic beliefs with some polytheistic beliefs. The returning Jews from the second deportation executed by conquering Babylon viewed these surviving remnant with disdain and thus as impure. This shows the reason Samaritans treated Jesus badly in the verses below:

 

51 Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem, 52 and sent messengers before His face. And as they went, they entered a village of the Samaritans, to prepare for Him. 53 But they did not receive Him, because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem. 54 And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, “Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?”[a]

 

55 But He turned and rebuked them,[b] and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.[c]And they went to another village. (Bold text is mine – Luke 9-51-56 NKJV)

 

Hmm … What would Mohammed have done?

 

11 “Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake. 12 Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

 

43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,[b] 45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet your brethren[c] only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors[d] do so? 48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect. (Matthew 5: 11-12, 43-48 NKJV)

 

How would Mohammed react to an enemy?

 

10 Also He said to them, “In whatever place you enter a house, stay there till you depart from that place. 11 And whoever[a] will not receive you nor hear you, when you depart from there, shake off the dust under your feet as a testimony against them.[b] Assuredly, I say to you, it will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city!” (Mark 6-10-11 NKJV)

 

Mecca authorities had given Mohammed the boot. Mo went to Medina for refuge. For some idiotic reason the Medinans who appeared to be swayed by a Jewish-Arab tribe made a deal with Mo, BUT Mo began to gather in followers largely to the revenue sharing plan from robbing trade caravans. These followers became militarized. The Medina Jews became concerned with the writing on the wall concerning Mo’s power. Mo sets up the Jewish-Arab tribe with a false accusation providing the excuse to usurp power and authority from the Jewish-Arabs. The final result – Mo beheaded all the males above puberty and placed the useful women (regardless of marital status) into sex-slavery. After the Jews and Mo’s own Arab tribe were sufficiently subdued the false prophet practically walked on in to Mecca as the new ruler. Mo spent the remainder his days conquering today’s Arabic Peninsula being particularly harsh to those refusing to convert to Islam.

 

Christians have a non-compete clause but as earlier noted Scripture does not demand violence or death for refusing Christ as Savior. Neither do the Scriptures demand violence or death for a person who chooses to leave the Faith either for another or out of atheism. Even so leaving Christianity places a person in a position to have their name erased from the Book of Life opened at the Last Judgment.

 

6 since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble you,7 and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, 8 in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, 10 when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe,[a] because our testimony among you was believed. (2 Thessalonians 1: 6-10 NKJV)

 

If one leads an unchristian lifestyle yet still professes Christianity there is a problem that needs to be dealt with. But still, the solution is not violence or death:

 

9 I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world.11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.

 

12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”[a] (1 Corinthians 5: 9-13 NKJV)

 

Shunning an unrepentant apostate in the hope that repentance brings a return to Faith:

 

6 This punishment which was inflicted by the majority is sufficient for such a man, 7 so that, on the contrary, you ought rather to forgive and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one be swallowed up with too much sorrow. 8 Therefore I urge you to reaffirm your love to him. 9 For to this end I also wrote, that I might put you to the test, whether you are obedient in all things. (2 Corinthians 2: 6-9 NKJV)

 

Knowingly flirting with any sin that separates from God after experiencing Redemption in Christ presents a danger to self that may have eternal consequences:

 

1 Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2 of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3 And this we will[a] do if God permits.

 

4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away,[b] to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.

 

9 But, beloved, we are confident of better things concerning you, yes, things that accompany salvation, though we speak in this manner. 10 For God is not unjust to forget your work and labor of[a] love which you have shown toward His name, in that you have ministered to the saints, and do minister. 11 And we desire that each one of you show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope until the end, 12 that you do not become sluggish, but imitate those who through faith and patience inherit the promises. (Hebrews 6: 1-6, 9-12 NKJV)

 

Salvation is easy to attain in Christ but one must be sure to work out their Salvation in order to NOT condemn themselves to a negative eternal judgment.

 

Jesus Christ the Son of God is the ONLY way to a positive eternity in union with God Almighty:

 

7 Then Jesus said to them again, “Most assuredly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. 8 All who ever came before Me[a] are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them. 9 I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture. 10 The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly. (John 10: 7-10 NKJV)

 

6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

 

15 “If you love Me, keep[a] My commandments. 16 And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever— 17 the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.

 

19 “A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me. Because I live, you will live also. 20 At that day you will know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you. 21 He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him.”

 

26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. 27 Peace I leave with you, My peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. (John 14: 6, 15-17, 19-21, 26-27 NKJV)

 

The Christian non-compete clause thus is an extension of God’s Grace and Mercy in which the actual outcome results in a positive or negative Last Judgment according to the time spent in your mortal coil and your last mortal breath.

 

JRH 9/11/14

Please Support NCCR

******************************

Islam’s Non-Compete Clause

 

By Kenneth Roberts

September 6, 2014

Political Islam

 

Imagine a football league where only one team is allowed to score goals or win. That’s the premise of political Islam.

 

Islam is the only religion with a non-compete clause. Non-compete agreements in today’s business world defend proprietary information. Proprietary ideas give companies their leading edge. Islam goes beyond branding itself ‘the best’ (which all ideologies do); Islam forbids other ideologies from competing with Islam in a number of areas. It’s like a modern corporation, but more ruthless.

Islam’s Unique Idea

Islam’s unique, proprietary idea is jihad, the holy war to eliminate competition with Islam. According to Ibn Khaldun, the holy war of jihad is not permitted to other religions or ideologies.

 

Non-Compete Regulations

Islam’s non-compete restrictions are summarized in the infamous Pact of Omar and Sharia law. They regulate non-Muslims from competing with Muslim males in the following areas: proselytizing, politics, employment opportunities, social status, prestige or ‘honor’, public events, using the Arabic language, teaching about Islam, marrying Muslim women, the security of possessions and the elegance or height of buildings…even in how the Kafirs dress. Nor may women compete with Muslim males, since Allah made women constitutionally inferior to men ‘in reason and religion’.

Islam’s non-compete restrictions are the Kafirs’ terms of surrender to the Islamic state. The Pact of Omar was made by eighth-century caliphs to be forced on non-Muslims against their wills. Wherever Islamists become the ruling class, the Pact of Omar is dragged out to crush whatever challenges Islamic monopolies. That makes Kafirs and women permanent underclasses in Sharia-ruled societies.

 

Islamists want to insinuate Sharia into Kafir societies before Kafirs and women are aware of its non-compete implications.

In a Sharia society, non-competition applies everywhere, even in the law courts where Sharia favors the inconvenience, impoverishment and humiliation of Kafirs and the inferior status of women.

 

How Islam defends non-competition

Islamic non-competition is defended by jihad. Jihad is a monopoly on aggression. Allah forbids Kafirs from resisting jihad in any way, since counterjihad is a way of competing with Islam.

What makes Islam’s non-compete system draconian is the normative means to enforce it: vigilantism. Since murder is reprehensible, Sharia law craftily hides the murder of Kafirs and apostates behind verbiage, mumbo jumbo and silence. Silence should not be overlooked as a powerful legal weapon!

 

America’s emancipation of slaves did not entirely end slavery. American slavery slyly continued as late as 1928 because no punishment was on the books for slave-owners, even though slavery was illegal. Similarly, Sharia law has no punishment for a vigilante who murders an apostate or a blasphemer. Islamic vigilantes in such cases are ‘killing by right’, that is, Allah authorizes killing apostates and blasphemers on the example of Mohammed. Vigilantes are considered auxiliary police enforcing Allah’s non-compete laws. Such vigilantes are heroes, rather than criminals.

 

Islam’s top authority on Sharia, the fatwa department of Al Azhar University in Cairo has sanctioned Islamic vigilantism. In theory, the death sentence for blasphemy is imposed by the Islamic state, but if the state isn’t available to act, a private Muslim vigilante may carry out a death sentence against a blasphemer. This is where Islamic law gets interesting. A self-directed vigilante may execute a fatwa issued by an imam, but even a fatwa is not necessary. When a Kafir competes with Islam or its prophet, a vigilante may murder the blasphemer even without a fatwa being issued.

 

We cannot imagine a Christian pastor issuing a death warrant, yet two hundred thousand imams are authorized to do so and over a billion Muslims are deputized to kill. Many writers and cartoonists around the world (such as Salman Rushdie, Robert Redecker, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Kurt Westergaard, Lars Vilks, Molly Norris, Trey Parker and Matt Stone) have a clear understanding of Islamic vigilantism, since they live with full-time security guards. Almost everyone writing about Islam has received anonymous death threats. Writing about Islam breaches Islam’s non-compete clause.

Results of Non-Compete

The cost of Islam’s non-compete contract is stagnation. ‘Innovation’ (an evil word in Islam) is forbidden, because Islam’s alleged perfection cannot be improved. The 7th century is deemed the time of perfection, so Muslims cannot progress past it. Sharia leads the world backwards to the 7th century, not forwards to progress.

 

Muslims want to be world leaders, but their non-compete makes them followers. Competition has everything and produces everything that the Islamic world craves and needs for its survival, but the Muslim world produces little because of its philosophy of non-competition.

Jihadists curb their cognitive dissonance by repeating their certainty of Islam’s moral perfection until they all but drown out the images and voices of modernity. They want Islamic terrorism removed from discussion, so that 7th-century-loving Muslims are not contrasted with progress-loving Kafirs. Jihadists live in denial, but many burn out: they half-heartedly see backwardness is not the answer.

What should we do?

 
First of all, Kafirs need to see Islam’s non-compete clause is a real threat to progress and democratic values. Islamic belief in non-competition means that no progress is needed or possible. But Islam’s allegedly perfect society never existed, unless slavery, misogyny, vigilantism, inequality and genocide are ‘perfect’. Non-competition is bad for people. Societies that imposed monopolies on thought and political power have had cycles of revolution and counter-revolution or have stalled in poverty, disease and superstition.

Secondly, we should fault Islam’s non-compete system because it spreads fear; we should ban jihad because it has caused more than 270 million deaths and always creates tyrannies.

Recognizing political Islam’s dysfunction, today’s Muslims flee from it to live in free non-Islamist countries. Surveys show 65% of Muslims are Islamists in theory, but not in practice. This contradiction is Islam’s Achilles’ heel. Westerners should highlight it, rather than flattering the Islamism of oil-rich countries in order to keep oil prices low.

Mohammed declared endless war on competition giving Muslim males monopolies on everything. Jihadists expect to win this war through high birthrates and terrorism.

Many Western leaders shield jihad and supremacism from ideological scrutiny because they underestimate the pervasiveness of Islamism. Are they fit to lead?

As Islamism spreads, the vibrancy of the competitive world will gradually be dampened by Islam’s non-competition and terrorism.

 

It is self-refuting to fight the jihadists militarily, without blaming Islam’s non-compete philosophy. Non-competition is what ignites the jihadist culture, so refuting the non-compete philosophy of Islam should be a top priority.

 

“A footnote to a reader ‘David’ [Ken — September 7, 2014 @ 7:34 PM]:

Convict leasing began in 1846 and lasted until July 1, 1928, when Herbert Hoover was vying for the White House. When the U.S. entered World War II, the Franklin Roosevelt administration realized that the continued existence of involuntary servitude in the South undermined war propaganda against the Axis. Less than a week after Pearl Harbor, Circular N0. 3591 was issued to all federal prosecutors instructing them to prosecute cases of “involuntary servitude and slavery”. Finally, the Thirteenth Amendment would be enforced.

Sharia law maintains a loophole allowing the murder of apostates and blasphemers by private Muslims.”

________________________

Christianity’s Non-Compete Clause

John R. Houk

© September 11, 2014

_____________________

Islam’s Non-Compete Clause

 

© 2007-2014 CSPI, LLC

Theopolitical Symbolism of Hijab and Comments Following


Nun-Devoted Hijab-Oppressed

 

An Intro by John R. Houk

© April 15, 2014

 

Dr. Bill Warner (PhD) is a Counterjihad author and speaker that has a blog called Political Islam and operates a website called Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) which is a publishing house for Bill Warner’s writings. Many of those writings are free or low cost and can be found in a PDF format. I have no explanation as to why; however Warner lately has not been posting on the Political Islam main page lately BUT has been posting little mini-seminars in the Youtube format that Political Islam subscribers are notified about.

 

I am cross posting one of these videos in which Dr. Warner talks for a little over 7 minutes on the significance of the symbolism of the hijab worn by Muslim women dedicated to Sharia Law. You will find that interesting.

 

Then after the video I decided to cross post the comments that have been posted up to the time of today’s reading which is April 15, 2014. Most comments are short and appreciative of the mini-video seminar. However you will get to a person who calls himself John Islam. I tried to see if there was a significant Muslim apologist by that name but discovered that there are people with that name ranging from business in the UK and everyday social sharers on Facebook and Twitter some from nations other than the USA. I did find one person on Blogger with that name but his interest appears to be in Motocross and I had the impression he had passed away. None of those John Islams appeared to be an activist Muslim apologist.

 

The John Islam that leaves a comment on Dr. Warner’s video is critical of his analysis followed by some Youtube links which I will post but not the actual videos. You’ll have to check on the message of those Youtube links on your own.

 

Then there are to commenters that are critical of John Islam’s criticism (Éamonn Gavin and person going by Lidia). Lidia provides the most pointed criticism to John Islam.

 

I’ll finish with an about page pertaining to Dr. Bill Warner from the Political Islam blog.

 

JRH 4/15/14

Please Support NCCR

******************************

The Political Side of the Hijab

 

By Bill Warner

April 7, 2014

Political Islam

 

Bill Warner Video

 

++++++++++++++++++++

COMMENTS

 

“I attended your lecture in Bartlett, TN. I certainly found it enlightening. Thank you for your efforts against this onslaught against our country.”

 

Sharon Story — April 7, 2014 @ 9:28 PM

_________________

“Thanks Bill for the great message, absolutely agree with all your words, have good experience living in Muslim country and seeing the problems you described. Somehow we should bring all these issues described in this web to our government for taking action now otherwise it will be too late.

European countries are almost lost and I don’t think they have any chance or possibility to change anything now or in the future, United State is a next victim.”

 

Garry — April 8, 2014 @ 2:52 AM

_____________________

“Bill Warner’s claim that the hijab is the equivalent of a statement of fanaticism is proved in the following video. Hijab-wearing women are asked a simple question: “Is Sharia BARBARIC?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1QIXCNbD_xk#t=197

 

democracyistheanswer — April 8, 2014 @ 6:06 AM

__________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QIXCNbD_xk

 

democracyistheanswer — April 8, 2014 @ 6:10 AM

___________________________

“Another foolish statement by BILL WARNER….

Hijab is too distinguished between Kafir and the Pious Muslim called Muslimah.

When we are the majority, those women that are not covered according to Islamic Sharia LAW will be rape and be humiliated. So a Muslimah will be spared if she wears the Hijab. It is also designed for all Muslim man to be suppressed sexually as we cannot touch or try any means to direct a MUSLIMAH for sex.

Thus ALLAH came out with this grand solution that we can now look for kafir woman for rape and sodomy and all sort of sexual pervasion before on the kafir. This is sanctioned and approved in our Hadith and Koran. In our OIC country, we are having can rape any kafir and sanction in all OIC country.

We Muslim give thanks o ALLAH for allowed us MUSLIM to rape all white European women all over Europe from Sweden to Denmark and THERE IS NOTHING you can do.

 

[Blog Editor: This makes Islam a sick perverted religion. The God in the Judeo-Christian Bible never encourages rape because unbelievers deserve it!]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fEhy0H3fsM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGIyc_3nziE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIrcNL9PfUU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6k9P7L3tYk

It will happen in TENNESEE and all over USA.

 

John Islam — April 8, 2014 @ 7:20 AM

___________________________________

“John Islam”, I am sure that at the back of it all you are something basically resembling a human being. It’s just a pity that that is not what presents itself in your writings. It is very sad that humanity has to deal with your sort. However, make no mistake about it – deal with you and your sort WE WILL!!!

 

Éamonn Gavin — April 8, 2014 @ 9:37 AM

______________________________________

Hi Dr. Bill Warner,

Thank you for your video. We are with you to crush these Islamic Demons.

 

THE TRUTH SEEKER — April 9, 2014 @ 3:07 AM

__________________________

Hi Bill,

I don’t have a problem with hijab if the woman is truly wearing it for cultural or religious reasons. Hijab sort of reminds me of the babushka. If the hijab is forced upon a woman or girl by her husband or family, that is wrong. Especially in a free civilized world. What really bothers me are the burkas/abayas with the hoods/full face covering. It looks very scary to me (in a spiritual sense). I think over 90% of muslim women would prefer not to wear them. I would rather they wear the hijab then the burkas/abayas. I believe burkas/abayas should not be worn in a free civilized world. I can understand why they wear it in third world countries. They are surrounded by men who will find any excuse to beat and rape them. It protects the woman from harm. It’s kind of sad. If you do see burkas/abayas worn in the West, it’s most likely forced upon them by their husbands who are using it for political reasons. Bill, you are right about that.

 
Remember Adam and Eve walked around naked in the Garden of Eden. When the devil deceived them, what was the first thing they did? They put on clothes. God was wondering why they had clothes on. Interesting isn’t it. Burkas/abayas with the hoods that have the full face covering are totally opposite of what God truly wants for us. I’m pretty sure he wants to see our beautiful faces in the sunlight.

As for John Islam who thinks Muslims should give thanks to Allah for allowing the rape and sodomy of all white European women and says there is nothing we can do about it. There is something we can do about it. In a civilized world, it’s called prison and deportation. It is happening everyday. For example, there was a Somalian man who raped a dying woman in Sweden. He was accused and then deported. It is cheaper to deport an immigrant than to put them in prison. It’s a better option, economically speaking. That goes for any immigrant, not just Muslims, who do not follow the laws of the host country they live in. And in the future, the Great King Henri de la Croix (the Cross) (aka Great Monarch, King of France, King of Europe) and his powerful army will eliminate from the face of the Earth all those murderers and rapists. He will be called, “Good King Henry.” John, Europe is not gone. You and your kind will be!

VIVE LA FRANCE! VIVE LA FRANCE! VIVE LA FRANCE! VIVE LA FRANCE! VIVE LA FRANCE!

 

Lidia — April 9, 2014 @ 11:50 AM

_____________________________

“Thank you Dr. Bill Warner for exposing the true Islam. I only hope and pray that the West will wake up soon before it is too late to face a nightmare, in the likes of john islam.

 

michael — April 12, 2014 @ 11:14 PM

_________________________

Theopolitical Symbolism of Hijab and Comments Following

An Intro by John R. Houk

© April 15, 2014

______________________________

The Political Side of the Hijab

 

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.

www.politicalislam.com

 

© 2007-2014 Political Islam

 

Bill Warner:

 

Bill Warner holds a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968. He has been a university professor, businessman, and applied physicist.

He was a Member of the Technical Staff in solid-state physics at the Sarnoff Princeton Laboratories in the area of integrated circuit structures. During the energy crisis of the 80’s he founded and ran a company that specialized in energy efficient homes. For eight years he was a professor at Tennessee State University in the Engineering School.

 

Dr. Warner has had a life-long interest in religion and its effects on history. He has studied the source texts of the major religions for decades. Even before the destruction of the World Trade Center he had predicted the war between Islam and America. The day after 9/11 he decided to make the source texts of Islam available for the average person.

Dr. Warner’s training in scientific theory and mathematics shaped how he analyzed Islamic doctrine. The first step was realizing that the Islamic texts had been made deliberately difficult to read and comprehend. A program, the Trilogy Project (see below), was created to strip away the confusion in the texts. It became clear that Islam is not constructed on the same civilizational principles as the rest of the world. Simple statistical methods revealed that dualism and submission were the foundational principles of Islamic doctrine.

Statistical methods applied to the Islamic texts showed that:

 

 

– Islam is far more of a political system than a religion.


– There is no unmitigated good in Islam for the Kafir (non-Muslim).


– Islam’s ethical system is dualistic and is not based on the Golden Rule.


– Islamic doctrine cannot be reconciled with our concepts of human rights and our Constitution.


– The great majority, 96%, of all Islamic doctrine about women subjugates them.


– The Sunna (what Mohammed did and said) is more important than the Koran in a Muslim’s daily life.

Dr. Warner coined the term, Foundational School of Islamic studies, which holds that Islam is found in the Trilogy of Koran, Sira and Hadith. All evaluation of Islamic history and current activity is caused by the doctrine found in this Trilogy. Therefore, it is impossible to READ THE REST

Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible


Here is a five minute or so video of Bill Warner explaining that when a Muslim says Islam is peace or Islam categorically condemns terrorism, that Muslim is being deceptive. (Warner doesn’t mention overt deception as opposed to self-deceived deception. It is my opinion that a huge amount of Muslims simply believe their Imams out of hand rather than checking for themselves.)

 

JRH 2/11/14

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible

 

By Bill Warner

February 5, 2014

Political Islam

 

One of the most discouraging things about dealing with Islam is how our leadership has learned nothing in the years since Sept 11, 2001. Leadership’s favorite fantasy is that Islam is whatever a Muslim wants to say it is. So if you want a nice Islam, ask a nice imam. But, would a Muslim deceive the Kafir (non-Muslim)? Mohammed did.

 

VIDEO: Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible

________________________

© 2007-2014 Political Islam

 

Mission

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

Biography of Bill Warner

 

Sharia: Necessity and Obligation


In an email alert from Political Islam owner/administrator Bill Warner a video link to about a four and one/half minute lecture entitled, “Sharia: Necessity and Obligation”. In essence Warner explains how the necessities of living out weigh the performance of Islamic obligations particularly as it depends on the actions prescribed by Sharia Law.

 

The link Warner provides is actually to his website where locates the Youtube video. The Political Islam post only shows the video without any explanatory direction. So I am going to cross post this as it appeared in the email alert with perhaps some editorial comments from me in brackets.

 

 

JRH 2/5/14

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

Sharia: Necessity and Obligation

 

By Bill Warner

Sent: Jan 30, 2014 11:51 AM

Political Islam

 

Here is a video on a way to deal with the demands of the Sharia.

Necessity and Obligation

 

[From Bill Warner Youtube Channel:

 

Published on Jan 24, 2014

The answer to the demands of the Sharia is a full application of Sharia. In particular, we need to understand how necessity can abrogate obligation.]

 

################

Sharia Redux: Necessity and Obligation

 

When I sent out the video, Necessity and Obligation, there were several questions asked about the textual authority that spoke about this principle. The Reliance of the Traveller is a desk top Sharia text of great authority. Section c6.0, Dispensation and Strictness (another name for Necessity and Obligation), reads:

 

c6.2 Dispensation is when what is normally forbidden is made permissible because of a necessity or need. (You can read the rest)

 

Also in r32.1 we find: …necessity excuses on from any rule whatever…

 

Section c7.2 also addresses that hardship can mean that an obligatory duty does not need to be performed.

 

[Editor: Bill Warner’s link that instructs you to “read the rest” will send you to a PDF document entitled, “Reliance of the Traveller and Tools for the Worshipper.” The PDF document is 336 pages long – good luck locating Warner’s quoted text. But seriously, you might wish to read PDF document at your leisure because the “Reliance of the Traveller” is a Sharia handbook for purist Muslims written in 1368 AD by AHMAD IBN

NAQIB AL-MISRI. This English translated edited version PDF is 336 pages but the original manual is approximately 1251 pages long. (Complete PDF)]

_____________________________

Political Islam Mission:

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

Biography of Bill Warner

 

Inoculating Against Islam


Islam a Disease Bumper Sticker

Vaccination toon

I have been meaning to cross post this Bill Warner essay on Islam for a few days and then out of sight – out of mind took over. Thanks to my membership in the Facebook group 1683 AD (closed group) I was reminded. I usually like to do a bit of an introduction; however a fellow member Diane has done well to do that in the group share of the article “Inoculating Against Islam”.

 

JRH 8/13/13

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

Intro to Inoculating Against Islam

 

By Diane Fatouros

8/11/13 12:48 PM

1683 AD

 

Excerpt |”Preventing conversion is easy to accomplish by inoculating anyone with what Islam really is. One reason that Kafirs (non-Muslims) convert is that they do not know the complete Islam. They are only told about the first stage of Islam – loving what Allah loves. Converts are never told that the final stage is to hate what Allah hates. Allah hates the Kafir and Kafir civilization, such as free speech and equal rights. The convert has been exposed to the “good stuff”, but does not know the full doctrine of a dualistic Islam. The other side of the “good stuff” is darkness such as jihad, abuse of women and slavery.”

_____________________

Inoculating Against Islam

 

By Bill Warner

August 13, 2013

Political Islam

 

Every (sic) since 9/11 Americans, including Christians, have been converting to Islam or become apologists for Islam. Can this be stopped and how?

 

There are many reasons they choose Islam. Islam is furiously masculine and today Christianity has become feminine, yin, in its approach to life. So, if you are a woman and want a more masculine man, you are much more apt to find that in Islam. Also, if you are a woman and want a husband, Muslims are the marrying kind. Then, there are people in this world who want discipline and Islam certainly gives structure. Once you get on the Islam train you no longer have to worry about choices. Islam tells you how to eat, have sex, brush your teeth, use the bathroom and every other aspect of life. There is also the social bonding of being in a tight knit group-club. These are a few of the reasons people convert.

 

Preventing conversion is easy to accomplish by inoculating anyone with what Islam really is. One reason that Kafirs (non-Muslims) convert is that they do not know the complete Islam. They are only told about the first stage of Islam – loving what Allah loves. Converts are never told that the final stage is to hate what Allah hates. Allah hates the Kafir and Kafir civilization, such as free speech and equal rights. The convert has been exposed to the “good stuff”, but does not know the full doctrine of a dualistic Islam. The other side of the “good stuff” is darkness such as jihad, abuse of women and slavery.

 

The problem is that we have all been told that we cannot understand Islam and that Islam is found in the Koran. We are told that it is way too complex and subtle. The only to know Islam is to ask a Muslim or an establishment “expert”. This is absolute garbage. Islam is Allah and Mohammed, pure and simple. To know Islam, know Allah and Mohammed. Allah is hard to understand, at first, but there is an easy shortcut. The Koran tells us that Mohammed is the perfect pattern of life for all Muslims and that every Muslim should imitate Mohammed. His life example is so important that it has a special name, the Sunna

 

If you count up all the words in the Koran and the words devoted to Mohammed, there is about six times more text devoted to Mohammed than to Allah. Mohammed solves the problem of how to know the true nature of Islam.

 

Everybody knows someone who has tried to read the Koran and never finished it. Islam seems like a tropical jungle, deep and complex. But that is not true, since Islam is both Allah and Mohammed.

 

Allah may be hard to understand, but anybody can understand Mohammed. The reason is simple. We have his official biography (called the Sira) and it is a fascinating, ripping read. After Mohammed is born he soon becomes an orphan. He married and became a successful businessman, then a prophet of Allah. He preached Islam for 13 years and converted 150 Muslims. Next he became a politician and jihadist for his last 10 years. When he died every Arab in Arabia was a Muslim. The Sira has religion, plots, spies, war, torture, secret agents, slavery, sex, jealousy and more. It is one of the world’s great stories.

 

Anyone, and I mean anyone, can understand the story of a man’s life. Mohammed is the perfect Muslim. When you understand Mohammed, you can easily understand the Koran and you can understand Islam.

 

This is how easy it is to know Mohammed. The original Sira is 800 pages long and difficult to read. But the book has been made easy to understand in a very short book of only 66 pages, called The Life of Mohammed. Everything is keyed by a small index number at the beginning of the paragraphs that lets you go the official text and confirm it. It is fact-based and is as true as it can be and is a short powerful book.

 

I ran an experiment. I paid $20 to a smart 12 year-old child to read The Life of Mohammed. After she read it, I had her read the Gospel of Matthew. It is important to know that she had never been to church or read the Bible. I then asked if she had to have new neighbor would she want it to be Jesus or Mohammed? She said she wanted Jesus and then justified her answer by using the facts from Matthew and The Life of Mohammed. She used fact-based reasoning.

 

That is the way you inoculate against Islam. Full knowledge of Mohammed causes anyone of reasonable morals to avoid him and Islam. Once you know how much suffering Mohammed caused to every neighbor, you do not want to follow him. So, to prevent a case of conversion to Islam, prescribe a dose of Mohammed.

 

The news is even better since a dose of the Sira can cure a Muslim of Islam. It works like this – most Muslims know almost nothing about Islam. If you know the full story of Mohammed, you know Islam and can tell a Muslim things about Mohammed that will unsettle them. Upon the first administration of Mohammed to a Muslim, they will deny the truth of it. But you can offer to show it to them in the Sira, the Sunna of Mohammed. Repeated dosage can cure Islam.

 

To inoculate against Islam, use a dose of Mohammed. To cure Islam, do the same. Don’t forget, a dose of Mohammed is so interesting that you will want to take some as well.

__________________________

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.

www.politicalislam.com

 

Mission

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.


Biography of Bill Warner

 

 

Frustrated with Muslim Apologists? Me Too!


Islam Exposed

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2013

 

Ask a Muslim: Why is the Jesus of the New Testament so peaceful offering a choice of life in Christ or eternal separation from God in the next world in rejecting Jesus while Muhammad of the Quran offered violent repression or physical death in this world for being rejected by non-Muslims?

 

Ask a Muslim: What is the difference between a Christian history violence and compulsive conversion outside the commands of the New Testament and Islamic violent imperial conquest followed by offering the conquered a compulsory decision of converting, submitting to a repressive lifestyle that submits to Islamic rules or death under direct command of the Quran and Hadith?

 

I ask these questions because a noticeably upset non-Muslim has written a Facebook Note entitled “The Truth about islam and trying to get 1 muslim to answer a simple question. If you ask are you an islamphob(e)) or islam-realist!” The post does not really ask that “simple question”. It does enumerate a list of atrocities committed by Muslims under the direction of Islam’s holy writings – the Quran, Hadith and Sira (Sunna). Then the author of the Note quite correctly points out New Testament warnings of believing false prophets and of adding and subtracting from the Word of God. The author’s enumeration is that which makes this post relevant for people to read. Indeed, these are things that Christian ministries and Churches need to grow a Gospel background to expose the nature of Islam as opposed to Christian teaching.

 

Muslims Apologists have learned a Leftist tactic (See Also HERE). When confronted with reality a Muslim Apologist will divert attention from the real answer to a question or a stated accusation that is derived directly from Islam’s holy writings. That Muslim Apologist diversion or obfuscation usually likes to point out something like the history of the spread of Christianity is not absent of violence. AND that is true; however the Muslim Apologist will attempt to dominate a conversation by not allowing response to point out Christian violence in converting people is in direct violation of the Word of God found in the New Testament while Muslim violence in converting people is a REQUIREMENT of Islamic holy writings including the Quran considered the direct word of Allah by Muslims. Muslim Apologists have a host of other diversions and obfuscations to confuse the issue of Islamic reality.

 

Just a heads up I am performing a spell check on the Facebook Note because there is a few grammar/spelling issues indicating it was written hastily in frustration. A frustration by the way that I concur with. There are certain words intentionally un-capitalized which the author explains. I am will not change that grammar and if I do it was an accident except in cases of the beginning of a sentence. I apologize to the author capitalizing at the beginning of a sentence my quirky self is forced to do.

 

JRH 7/29/13 (Hat Tip; Richard – Against the ideology of Islam!)

Please Support NCCR

***********************************

The Truth about islam and trying to get 1 muslim to answer a simple question. If you ask are you an islamphob(e) or islam-realist!

 

Islam is a political agenda, not a religion

July 28, 2013 at 11:46 am

Islam is a political agenda, not a religion

Facebook Note

 

Friends over the last two weeks I must have had “conversations” with over 100 muslims from around the world. Then add to that some liberal – progressive sympathizers of islam. I have asked simple questions and not 1 muslim or appeaser of islam have answer or refuted my charges! Sadly the perversion of the Torah (Old Testament) and the New Testament by these Godless people is amazing! Wait, I use the word amazing when in the bible it talks about false prophecy. Matthew 7:15 “Watch out Friends for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.   Deu 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.

 

Then I close with this passage in Revelation 22:18-19 New King James: Revelation 22:18-19 King James Version (KJV)

 

18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

 

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

 

The Torah was written and finished around 3-4000 BC The New Testament around 40-60AD. Muslims and their appeasers will say that allah was there at the beginning. I point out that the qua’ran was written around 550-600 years after this passage, thus proving that the qua`ran is a complete lie!

 

Then some said that Jesus and muhammad were one in the same. Which I not only laugh at, I refute with this: Jesus was intelligent, loving, kind, merciful, and “THE SON OF GOD!” muhammad was the following: was a murderer, torturer, adulterer, rapist, con man, thief, pedophile, war monger, and a psychopath. In his delusional state, Satan aka Lucifer came to see that this evil creature, the evilest to ever walk the earth was a complete idiot as well. So the fallen angel spoke to muhammad and muhammad believed the great deceiver and Lucifer aka Satan gave muhammad a delusional vile image to justify muhammad evil and perverted life. You can take that to the bank muslims as this refute is the total 100% truth. Oh and by the way, islam for the 1,000,000 time is not a religion! It’s a political agenda run by murdering thugs with the ambition to take over the world and the expense and death to all and any non-muslim! 1,400 years of non-human actions by muslims prove this!

 

Jesus is 180 degrees different from muhammad, it’s the difference between Day and night, good and evil! Jesus is Day and Good, muhammad is night and evil.

 

I will again go on the record to say that the Fallen Angel Satan aka Lucifer saw muhammad in one of his delusional states and came to muhammad as allah to not only deceive muhammad but to justify the most evil and vile man whom ever lived muhammad.

 

I will now go into the first 3 commandments That God spoke of Moses, given to Moses from God on Mt Sinai: 

 

And God spake all these words, saying, I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

 

1.       Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

 

2.    Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

 

3.    Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

 

Obviously muslims by following muhammad and islam prove daily that they are not following these 3 basic commandments and are coveting false idols.

 

Friends I’ve been called an “Islamophob(e)” when in reality I am an “Islam-realist!” I where that badge – proudly.

 

Every time I point out the 1,400 of atrocities to mankind by muslims and followers of islam, no refutes from them. They just pervert and change the subject.

 

When I mention the 45 Nigerian Christian children butchered in their Christian school, the Coptic Christians slain in Egypt because they are Christians, The Israeli Family ambushed and brutally murdered of which one was a pregnant mother, the Hindi and Buddhists slain, the muslims in Elizabeth NJ and Dearborn MI along with muslims around the world dancing in the streets after the Towers fell on 9/11/2001 and 3,000 were dead! They just mostly ignore and some have the guile to say, it’s all in allah’s plan! What a disgusting answer, no remorse and ignoring these facts as usual.

 

Friends if we don’t stand up against the islamic tyranny which I barely touched on, there will be more honor killings, murders, beheadings, kidnappings, torture, female genital mutilation, pedophile, gang rape, etc.

 

Friends in all cultures their all always some evil and wrong doers. But if you study islam in its book the qua`ran and it’s right in there which tells its followers to do these things and worse to the nonbeliever, the infidel. Muslims are commanded by the qua`ran to lie to us and when they are in the minority blend in and be nice and wait, wait until you are in the majority and then you can be your true self.

 

Islam to me is nothing more than a political agenda, hell bent on total world domination at the cost of all infidel’s lives and processions. Get a qua`ran, study history as everything because said is 100% fact.

 

I also purposely will not capitalize islam, muhammad or allah as they don’t deserve it!

_____________________

Frustrated with Muslim Apologists? Me Too!

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2013

____________________

The Truth about islam and trying to get 1 muslim to answer a simple question. If you ask are you an islamphob(e) or islam-realist!

 

About Islam is a political agenda, not a religion

Find the Church of the St. Bernard


Two Saint Bernard dogs sit in the snow on the Great St. Bernard Pass after returning from their winter quarters in Martigny, Switzerland, Thursday, June 4, 2009. The dogs will spend the summer on the pass and return to Martigny towards the end of the year. (AP Photo/KEYSTONE/Jean-Christophe Bott)

John R. Houk

© June 21, 2013

 

We all know or should know that the Obama Administration is spying on ALL Americans AND has singled Conservatives via Obama’s reach through the IRS to harass their Free Speech by either disenfranchising their cause organizations or to create crimes that are not there for the Justice Department to intimidate Conservative individuals.

 

I just read a post from Bill Warner of Political Islam in which he accuses the Christian Church in America of becoming weak on moral principles. Warner makes a leap by connecting this moral weakness to the power of the IRS to threaten Churches’ 501c3 status. Most Churches in America connect their 501c3 status to their financial viability to operate. According to rules set up by Congress under the misguided concept of Separation of Church and State the IRS is empowered to crack down on any charity, philanthropic venture, religion – LIKE a Christian Church, nonprofit organization that has the purpose of providing an educational agenda – LIKE a Conservative Tea Party, an educate on Islam organization (e.g. showing how Islam is contradictory to the Constitution’s Bill of Rights) and/or even a Left Wing organization dedicated to correcting racist thought patterns, spreading multiculturalism, upholding Marxist principles that Leftists moronically believe will lead to a better society-culture and so forth whatever you can think of AS LONG AS the 501c3 status has nothing to do with a political agenda affecting Federal, State and Local government. Amazingly Left Wing 501c3 organizations that openly support political candidates seem to get a pass.

 

The thing is – who determines the line between educational and politics that effects the operation of government? Incidentally the operation of government in connection to 501c3 status typically means throwing support behind a political candidate for legislative or executive office on a Federal, State or Local level. That determination is broad and usually more stringent toward Churches during a Dem Party Presidential Administration. Unfortunately it occurs during a GOP Presidential Administration when Leftists complain to their Dem Party Senator or Congressman or they find a Left Wing bureaucrat in the IRS. Again unfortunately there are many Left Wing bureaucrats entrenched at all levels of government that are nearly impossible to fire under Civil Service rules.

 

Frankly these 501c3 political guidelines are a bunch of malarkey because they impose Free Speech restrictions and Religious Freedom restrictions in the name of a principle NO WHERE found in the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court began adding rule of law to the First Amendment on Church/State Separation in the early 1900s. In 1947 in a SLIM decision of 5-4 Justice Hugo Black wrote the opinion that SCOTUS has been following ever since. Black’s Opinion:

 

“The ‘establishment of religion’ clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State.'” 330 U.S. 1, 15-16. (Bold Emphasis Added)

 

I don’t have a law degree but I know how to read. Jefferson had little to do with writing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights directly. Jefferson’s famous phrasing was in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Church in Connecticut that was concerned of that State’s pre-Constitution days of a State Established Church in which the Baptists were excluded but still had to pay taxes to the State Church. Jefferson was merely emphasizing that the First Amendment forbids the Federal government from establishing a State Church which would be tax supported. The Wall of Separation meant that Christian Denominations no longer had to worry about paying taxes to support a State Church because Congress is forbidden to establish a Church Denomination that is tax supported.

 

Read this well written introduction to the actual letter Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Church:

 

The Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut wrote to President Thomas Jefferson on October 7, 1801, to complain about the infringement of their religious liberty by their state legislature: “what religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the State) we enjoy as favors granted, and not as inalienable rights: and these favors we receive at the expense of such degrading acknowledgments, as are inconsistent with the rights of freemen.” The Baptists, of course, acknowledged that “the president of the United States is not the national legislator,” but expressed the wish that his views on religious liberty would “shine and prevail through all these states and all the world.”

 

In his brief response, President Jefferson sympathized with the Connecticut Baptists in their opposition to the state’s established religion, while expressing his reverence for the First Amendment’s “wall of separation between Church & State” at the federal level. Jefferson was not advancing the modern view that religion must be excluded from the public square. After all, he concludes his letter, written in his official capacity as President, with a brief prayer.

 

The now well-known expression lay dormant for nearly a century and a half until Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in the 1947 case Everson v. Board of Education, put forth the novel interpretation that the First Amendment’s establishment clause applied to the states and that any government support or preference for religion amounts to an unconstitutional establishment of religion. In support of his argument for a radical separation of religion and politics, he cited Jefferson’s metaphor: “[t]he First Amendment has erected a wall of separation between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable.”

 

Jefferson’s actual aim was quite to the contrary. While he, along with James Madison, stoutly opposed established churches as existed in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and other states (while recognizing that, as President, he had to respect them), he was deeply committed to religious liberty. Jefferson’s letter must also be read in context of his declaration in the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom: “Almighty God hath created the mind free….” The “wall of separation” exists to affirm natural rights, including those of faith and religious worship. The “wall” does not imprison the free exercise of religion. Rather, Jefferson sought to prevent the domination of particular sects, making free the religious practices of all. (Bold Emphasis Added; Heritage Foundation – You can read Jefferson’s actual letter after the introduction)

 

The four Justices that disagreed with the majority opinion penned by Hugo Black were Justices Jackson, Frankfurter, Rutledge and Burton. Everson v Board of Education was about reimbursing parents of Catholic students on the taxpayer dime for transportation to Catholic Schools but not to private schools. For clarity the dissenting Justices agreed with Justice Black’s “…the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State”. The dissenting Justices were upset that the Majority Opinion viewed taxpayer money for transporting students to Catholic Schools was a public service and not a government affirmation of a religious institution. So if the Majority Opinion viewed using tax money as reimbursement was government support of a religious entity and thus overruled Ewing Township transporting Catholic kids just as Public School kids. The Supreme Court ruling would have been 9-0 and Black’s Jefferson quote would still loom at the end of the opinion and the Supreme Court would have still nullified the Original Intent of the wording of the First Amendment in the Establishment Clause which reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” The words simply forbid Congress to establish a national Church. The following words which “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” would indicate no government meddling in religion but the Religious Freedom to provide a moral influence on government and society at large.

 

Thanks to the 1947 SCOTUS ex nihilo expanded meaning to words in the First Amendment from words outside of the First Amendment, Leftist Secular Humanists have continuously used the Courts to water down Christian Morality in American Society. ONLY Congress could make the Constitutional call SCOTUS 1947 performed. AND Congress would be limited to specifically using the Amendment process to add words such as “a wall of separation between Church and State”. Constitutionally the Supreme Court only can say legislation is constitutional or unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution places legislation – whether it be by the Bill or initiating a Constitutional Amendment – under the purview of Congress.

 

The majority of Christians have failed to stand up and battle Leftists from bleeding Christianity and Biblical Morality out of the United States of America. In this manner Bill Warner is correct. In Christian America Christians attend the Church of the Poodle. American Christians might want to begin looking for the brave and saving Church of the St. Bernard.

 

JRH 6/21/13

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

The Church of the Poodle

 

By Bill Warner

June 17, 2013

Political Islam

 

It appears that the Obama administration is spying on churches and using the IRS to punish churches about their 501c3 tax exempt status (H/T AtlasShrugs). According to the article, the Obama administration has a program of snooping on the activity in and by churches. The collected church intelligence deals with members who are with Tea Party or who speak publically about guns. (Remember: “cling to their guns and Bibles”.) Some ministers believe that agents may have joined churches to spy.

As bizarre as this may seem, it dovetails with other known Obama administration views. Homeland Security has a profile (yes, all law enforcement uses profiling) of the pro-life, pro-gun, pro-Constitution and pro-Bible white Christian as being a potential terrorist.

We do know that the IRS has targeted conservatives, pro-Israel, pro-life, Tea Party and even Billy Graham. When the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association backed the North Carolina ballot initiative about gay marriage, it was notified by the IRS that its tax exempt status was going to be revoked. In the end it was not revoked, but the threat cost money, time and hassle.

All of this has the desired effect of chilling free speech in the churches.

Here is the point: there is no outcry from the churches! This lack of outrage is a measure of the health of Christianity in America-so weak that it cannot even protest the abuse. But, we already knew how morally weak the church is in its response to rape, theft, enslavement and murder of Christians throughout the Islamic world. Christians are the most persecuted demographic group in the world. Over 100,000 thousand Christians died last year, and the response of the churches is to smile and hold a dialog with Muslims who are brothers with the jihadist persecutors. Dhimmi ministers speak of loving their Muslim neighbors, but show no concern for dead Christians. The day of a minister having a Bible in one hand and a newspaper in the other is over. The new gospel is: What, me worry?

Why does the moral and spiritual decay of the church matter to a counter-jihadist? This is a civilizational war and our spiritual flank is unprotected. Instead of the church being a guard dog, it is a poodle. Ministers cannot even protect their own flocks, much less the nation. Back in the past the church was the foundation of the nation and a guardian of our society. But now the church won’t even bark at an enemy-foreign or domestic. All the church wants is a scratch behind the ears by the intruder. (In fairness, only 95% of the churches are being condemned here.) To be complete, the synagogues are a swamp of ignorance and cowardliness, as well.

So, to the counter-jihadist the church is at best a dead weight of massive ignorance and is frequently found in bridge-building dialogues with the enemy-Islam.

_____________________

Find the Church of the St. Bernard

John R. Houk

© June 21, 2013

____________________

The Church of the Poodle

 

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink:
http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/the-church-of-the-poodle/

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com

© 2007-2013 Political Islam
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.

Humor-gate in Manchester


Muslims Walking on U.S. Flag

I follow Bill Warner’s blog Political Islam. Just as the blog’s name suggests theme is exposing Islam as a religion that is more ideologically political than it is theologically religious. It is this reality that Muslim Clerics and Mullahs do not want you the kafir (Islam for non-Muslim) to know about. This is especially the case in America in our First Amendment protects Religious Freedom. If Americans ever caught on that Islam is a basically a political ideology of Supremacist Hegemonic Domination, Muslims that are purist (aka Radical Islam or Islamist or Salafist) realize that American voters would begin voting for Congressmen and Senators to protect the Constitution from Political Islam.

 

Consider this an introduction to Bill Warner’s post “Humor-gate in Manchester”.

 

JRH 6/8/13

Please Support NCCR

****************************************

Humor-gate in Manchester

 

By Bill Warner

June 6, 2013

Political Islam

 

On June 4 the FBI and DOJ (Department of Justice) appeared at a meeting called by AMAC (American Muslim Advisory Council — Muslim Brotherhood) in Manchester, TN. The meeting was due to a joke posted by a Coffee County Commissioner on Face Book. The DOJ Assistant Attorney General said in a newspaper interview that the joke might be classified as hate speech and a crime. Below is a political leaflet handed out to the over a thousand attendees at the meeting. (A note: there are only 10,000 people who live in Manchester, TN)

This event which uses the full Federal powers of the corrupt Department of Justice to suppress free speech and shape domestic politics will not be the last. The DOJ is now a full partner with the Muslim Brotherhood.

___________________

Fast and Furious, Benghazi-gate, DOJ Reporter-gate,
IRS Suppression of Free Speech and now—

 

Humor-gate, Free Speech Intimidation in Manchester TN

 

Why has Obama shaped law enforcement into agencies of intimidation of our political speech? It all starts with the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) in the UN with Resolution 16/18 that criminalizes any criticism of Islam since it blasphemes Islam. Blasphemy punishment is pure Sharia law. There is NO free speech in Islam, since it does not allow any criticism of Islam. Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, worked for 3 days in NY with the OIC to find a way to accommodate Islamic blasphemy and slander laws in America. Tonight is the fruit of that labor.

Government agencies are trained about Islam according to Muslim Brotherhood standards. They are taught that Islam is a religion and that Muslims are just like everybody else. It is forbidden to discuss Islam as a political system. Language is controlled and jihad doctrine cannot be used in the analysis of Islamic violence.

Look at tonight’s event. The AMAC (American Muslim Advisory Council) is a political group and this meeting is political, yet the government gives all Islamic politics the cover of religion. Religious Islam disguises political Islam and tries to enforce Sharia law.

You will be told tonight that the problem with Muslims in America is how they are victims of bigoted oppression. Victimhood is a feature of Islam. Mohammed was portrayed as a victim, without any fault. Therefore, Islam is without fault and Muslims are victims. As an example, on 9/11 Muslims were the real victims, because it made some Americans criticize Muslims and Islam.

The movie shown here tonight, Welcome to Shelbyville, is pure propaganda. Why don’t they show the fact-based film, Losing Our Sons? According to our government, a joke about Muslims is a more serious problem than Carlos Bledsoe (Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad) attempting to assassinate a rabbi here in Tennessee and his murder of our military in Arkansas. Did you know that there are no jokes about Mohammed in 1400 years? Political humor such as the Mohammed cartoons can result in riots and death. In America we can tell jokes such as Jesus, Tiger Woods and Moses are playing golf…. But, can we tell a joke about Mohammed and Aisha playing golf…? Not if it offends Muslims.

When Coffee County Commissioner Barry West posted his political satire on Face Book he found out that Islam never changes. Humor about anything Islamic has been forbidden by Sharia law for 1400 years, and it will not be tolerated now. The dhimmis (Kafirs, non-Muslims, who serve Islam) rush forward to placate a humorless Islam. This is all about the Islamists making a molehill out of a mountain.

This night is an example of how Obama’s Federal government is suppressing critical thought and forcing us to submit to an Orwellian authority. Facts are bigotry. Truth is hate.

______________________

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam

 

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.

www.politicalislam.com

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers

%d bloggers like this: