John R. Houk
© December 4, 2012
Allen West is one of those that was a victim of voting fraud (conveniently unsubstantiated) in which Democrat election officials obviously messed with the vote counting and Liberal Judge Dan Vaughn refused to initiate a recount even with obvious improprieties in St. Lucie County. Allen West is an American hero that understands the nature of Islam and stealth jihad being practiced in the USA. Below is a 2010 speech by West relating to lawfare and terrorism in America.
JRH 12/4/12 (Hat Tip: Stephen)
Posted by UAC4America
Feb 21, 2010
Part 6 of 6: On Feb. 19, 2010, Lt Colonel Allen West: War hero, Congressional candidate (FL 22nd district) and future national leader spoke at the FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE INAUGURAL EVENT at CPAC, hosted by Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller who were at CPAC (but not a part of it).
Geller said, ” I find it most distressing that the largest gathering of conservatives in America does nothing to address the single greatest threat to our national security, our Constitution, our very way of life……
Our event, on the other hand, will feature the first public appearance of the Steve Coughlin: Former Pentagon Islam specialist, fired after pressure from Islamic infiltrators (1st public appearance).
Also speaking will be Wafa Sultan: Author, A God who Hates, viral video star of Al-Jazeera debate with Islamic cleric,
Simon Deng: Ex-slave, leading human rights activist against jihad in Sudan Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff: facing “hate speech” charges in Austria for telling the truth about Islam,
Lt Colonel Allen West: War hero, Congressional candidate (FL 22nd district), future national leader. ” The two hours allotted was NOT enough time for such an important line-up…it was riveting.
Video-grapher: Red Squirrel of VigilantSquirrelBrigade.blogspot.com)
Allen West Remains Optimistic In Defeat
By Kevin Webb
December 4, 2012
Even after his defeat at the hands of young challenger Patrick Murphy in his re-election bid, Allen West (R-FL) is apparently unshaken. The GOP House Representative attempted to force a recount in some of Florida’s counties following the election, taking almost a full two weeks to concede to 29-year-old Murphy. West is optimistic about his political future, reminding NPR on Friday that “Abraham Lincoln only served one term in Congress, too.”
West has not revealed any future campaign plans, but based on his interview with NPR’s Michel Martin, he will take some personal time after he leaves office. He promised to continue to “stand up and fight for this country,” while making sure that his two teenage daughters “grow up in a great America that provides them all the opportunities that it provided to their mother and father.”
Murphy was a large underdog in this year’s campaign, with West learning both in campaign funding and spending. Still, the Florida Democrat was able to carry the same key demographics that won President Barack Obama the swing state during the election. Specifically, women helped Murphy beat out the incumbent, who were uncomfortable with GOP stances on key women’s rights issues. Becky Bond, executive director of the CREDO Mobile SuperPAC backing Murphy, commented on the strength of Florida’s women in ousting West.
“We did some message testing, and we found out that actually not only were there women in our office who the thing they really wanted to talk about was how these guys defended Planned Parenthood and wanted to talk about different kinds of rape — they were enraged by that — but we also found that our messages about women were more likely to move voters and the voters who were more likely to move were women,” Bond said during a Washington conference for progressive political groups. “So we thought, ‘This is great, we are just going to talk to women.’”
West’s $17 million raised in campaign funds were no help against mobilized minority demographics. West claimed civil rights leaders abandoned him as he fell victim to political attack ads that he deemed racist during the summer. As a black Republican, West can find little sympathy at either side of the political spectrum. After losing a re-election bid that some believed to be a slam dunk victory, his political path may be difficult going forward.
Lt Colonel Allen West’s Speech on Jihad and Islam for Freedom Defense Initiative
Allen West Remains Optimistic In Defeat
Copyright © 2012 · AtlantaBlackStar.com
John R. Houk
© November 7, 2012
I watched Fox News declare Obama the winner over Romney last night. Then I woke up this morning realizing it was not a mere nightmare. I had the sullen feeling I would have if my favorite football team had lost the Super Bowl (Seahawks by the way). My poor grandkids – I had the ‘you better not mess with mood’ working. I was so certain American voters were cognizant of the last four years of lies and deception that only committed Leftists would vote for the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama.
I am writing this without too much listening or reading to either the Conservative or the Leftist spin of Obama’s reelection victory.
The American voters have spoken. And yes I am aware this was a close election in the popular vote, but let’s be honest – Obama creamed Romney in the popular vote. As of writing these thoughts Florida still had not decided who got that State’s electoral votes. Guess what! Florida’s 29 electoral votes do not matter either way this election cycle. That is how big Obama won reelection.
Ergo, a majority of Americans believe in Obama’s vision for the USA and the transnational globe. Without attempting an exhaustive list that you could add upon here are some ideas to what American voters have chosen after already experiencing four years of Obamanation.
§ Obama’s entire academic political history has been following confirmed Marxists both of the Lenin/Stalinist Communism of people’s revolution and of Gramsci’s stealth revolution of transforming society under the radar.
§ Obama’s paper trail history has been covered up by Obama spending millions of dollars on lawyers to obfuscate the birth certificate issue, Social Security Card issue, the matter of citizenship of between a Kenyan Father, an Indonesian Step-Father and a mother with Marxist inclinations yet attracted to the Muslim culture. The document cover-up is particularly disturbing with hiding academic grades and papers written with an alleged academic mentality. Why hide those papers? Speculation is Obama may have felt the affinity Marxism may have been too strong for a remarkably Socialist enamored American electorate. Or Obama’s grades may have so poor an electorate my wonder how a Marxist undergrad moved up to the graduate level of Harvard (Occidental-Columbia-Harvard).
§ Obama’s religious mentor Jeremiah Wright immersed him in a liberal form of Christianity heavily influenced by Black Liberation Theology (BLT) combined with an affinity for the Muslim culture in which his childhood was immersed.
§ Obama’s role in leading America into a Socialist State by nationalizing healthcare and raising taxes including tax coercion to provide the illusion Obamacare is a fully funded government program.
§ Obama’s increasing of the National Debt to the point that U.S. financial cliff is in sight.
§ Obama’s use of an Executive Order to cover-up his Attorney General Eric Holder’s Fast and Furious scandal.
§ Obama’s lying because Benghazigate (Part 1 & Part 2) resulted in the death of four Americans especially that of Ambassador Chris Stevens who possessed the international protocol of diplomatic immunity.
§ I’m sure my fellow Conservatives can add to this list.
A MAJORITY OF AMERICAN VOTERS IGNORED THESE STAINS VALIDATING FOUR MORE YEARS OF OBAMA TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CULTURE AWAY FROM WHAT HAS MADE AMERICA GOOD!
I may change my mind after I cool off from this American blindness; however at this moment I feel on a personal level I need to make changes in political allegiances because those that actually run the Republican Party are more interested in a status quo Conservatism rather than actual Fiscal Conservatism and Social Conservatism and American Exceptionalism in Foreign Policy.
I have two to four years to find that direction. I do believe I will launch the investigative process to find that godly route.
The Lord Jesus reigns today and forever and human polity will one day be one with Christ.
Kenneth Copeland is a man of God that I admire. May not agree with everything he speaks but I do agree with most things. Below is a prophetic Word about the elections on November 6, 2012.
Posted by CopelandMinistries
Published on Nov 1, 2012
The Lord gave Kenneth Copeland a timely, prophetic word about the upcoming US National Election during a meeting on October 26, 2012, at Billye Brim’s prayer conference.
November 01, 2012
The Lord gave Kenneth Copeland a timely, prophetic word about the upcoming U.S. national election during a meeting on Oct. 26, 2012, at Billye Brim’s prayer conference.
Be blessed and encouraged by this word as we continue to stand together in faith—praying and voting in the Nov. 6 general election.
P.S. Remember to join us at AmericaStands2012.com on Nov. 6 starting at 7 p.m. (CT) and watch Election Coverage in the Spirit of Faith LIVE from Kenneth Copeland Ministries!
I am guessing this thirteen year old eighth grader doing a report in class is going to a private school. Public School teachers are too invested in Left leaning politics to allow the truth of Obama to be shown to a class.
JRH 11/4/12 (Hat Tip: Stephen and WCJ)
Posted by Jenny Cantrell
Oct 19, 2012
Jenny is a 13-year-old 8th grader who’s been interested in politics for a couple of years. She was confused about the claims of the Democrats and the claims of the Republicans. So, she decided to look at the facts and do a report card for President Barack Obama and one for Governor Mitt Romney. She compared them and now presents her findings in this video.
Caroline Glick tackles the campaigning of President Barack Hussein Obama by criticizing one of his ads. The essence of the ad is a young gal that relates voting for Obama is like having sex for the first time with a great guy. So you ladies you can get that first orgasmic memory back by voting for Obama.
Obama is trying to be pro-woman but in reality is showing a sex-object misogynistic attitude toward women.
Then Glick shows what it is really like voting for Obama. A vote for Obama is like voting for one of the most popular movements in the Muslim world known as the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). The MB is a classic example of the misogynistic demonizing of women. And you can add to this misogynism with Jew-hatred, Christian-hatred and America-hatred. Obama’s appeasement of Radical Islam under the delusion that this will bring world peace is one of the biggest deceptions being thrown at American voters.
So you can vote for Obama and make believe that first orgasm occurs as you place the ballot in the receptacle or you can use your head and dump Obama on November 6, 2012.
VIDEO: Lena Dunham: Your First Time
Obama and the politics of contempt
By Caroline Glick
November 2, 2012, 10:37 AM
“Your first time shouldn’t be with just anybody. You want to do it with a great guy.”
So begins the now famous official Barack Obama for President campaign ad that was released last week. The ad depicts a young woman named Lena Dunham, who is apparently a celebrity among Americans in their teens and 20s.
After that opening line, Ms. Dunham continues on for another minute and a half discussing how having sex for the first time and voting for Barack Obama for president are really the same thing, and how young women don’t want to be accused of either being virgins or of having passed up on their chance to cast their votes for Obama next Tuesday.
I’ve never been particularly interested in so-called “women’s issues.” It never seemed to me that any party or politician was particularly good or bad for me due to the way they thought of women. That all changed with the Dunham ad for Obama.
With this ad, Obama convinced me he is a misogynist.
The Obama campaign’s use of a double entendre to compare sex – the most personal, intimate act we engage in as human beings, with voting – the most public act we engage in as human beings – is a scandal.
It is demeaning and contemptuous of women. It reduces us to sexual objects. When called on to vote, as far as Obama is concerned, as slaves to our passions, we make our decisions not based on our capacity for rational choice. Rather we choose our leaders solely on the basis of our sexual desires.
Beyond the ad’s bald attempt to impersonalize, generalize and cheapen the most personal act human beings engage in, the ad is repulsive because it takes for granted that what happens in our private lives is the government’s business.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is a totalitarian position.
THE WHOLE point of liberal democracy is to put a barrier between a person’s personal life and his or her government. A liberal democracy is founded on the notion of limited government. It assumes there are a lot of places where government has no role to play. And first and foremost among those places is the bedroom.
The theory behind limited government is that if the government is permitted in our private space then we are no longer free. When – as in the case of the Dunham ad – a political campaign conveys the message that there is something personally wrong with not actively supporting its candidate, it communicates the message that it sees no distinction between personal and public life, and therefore rejects the basic notion of freedom from government. And this is repugnant, not just for women, but for everyone who values freedom.
One of the oddest aspects of the Obama sex ad is that to believe that this sort of message can be effective, the campaign had to ignore mountains of data about the demographic group the ad targets – young college-educated women.
According to just about every piece of survey data collected over the past 20 years, young women in America today are more accomplished, more professionally driven, and more intellectually successful than their male counterparts. That the Obama campaign believes the votes of this successful, smart group of women can be won by appealing to their basest urges rather than their capacity to reason is demeaning and perverse and, one would think, counterproductive.
But it isn’t surprising.
The fact is that the Obama campaign – and indeed, the Obama presidency – has treated the American people with unprecedented arrogance and contempt. On issue after issue, Obama and his minions have eschewed intellectual argumentation.
On issue after issue they have preferred instead to attack Obama’s detractors as stupid, backwards, bigoted, bellicose and evil.
For instance, however one feels about current events in the Middle East, there is a legitimate – indeed critical – argument to be had about the nature of the Islamist forces the Obama administration is supporting from Cairo, Egypt, to Alexandria, Virginia.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the most popular movement in the Islamic world. It is also a totalitarian, misogynist, anti-Jewish, anti-Christian and anti-American movement. It seeks Islamic global supremacy, the genocide of Jewry, the subjugation of Christianity and the destruction of the United States.
There is an intellectual case to be made for appeasing these popular, popularly elected forces.
There is a (stronger) intellectual case to be made for opposing them. But rather than make any of the hard arguments for appeasing the Muslim Brotherhood, the Obama administration has deflected the issue by castigating everyone who opposes its appeasement policies as racist, McCarthyite warmongers.
If women who don’t support Obama are prudish geeks, Americans who oppose his appeasement policies are bloodthirsty bigots.
Then there was the attack in Benghazi on September 11 and the general Islamic assaults on US embassies throughout the Muslim world that day.
The acts of aggression that Muslims carried out against several US embassies on September 11 and since have all been acts of war against America.
The rioters who stormed the US embassies in Egypt, Tunis and Yemen and replaced the American flag with the flag of al-Qaida all violated sovereign US territory and carried out acts of war. The US had the right, under international law, to repel and respond with military force against the rioters as well as against their governments. Instead the White House blamed the acts of war on a US citizen who posted a video on YouTube.
Then there was Benghazi. In Benghazi, jihadists took this collective aggression a step further. They attacked the US Consulate and a US government safe house with mortars and rocket-propelled grenades. Their goal was to murder all the US citizens inside the compounds. In the event, they successfully murdered four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
In the six weeks that have passed since the attack in Benghazi, despite administration attempts to stonewall, and despite the US’s media’s inexcusable lack of interest in the story, information has continuously dribbled out indicating that Obama and his senior advisers knew in real time what was happening on the ground. It has also come out that they rejected multiple requests from multiple sources to employ military power readily available to save the lives of the Americans on the ground.
There may be good reasons that Obama and his top aides denied those repeated requests for assistance and allowed the American citizens pinned down in Benghazi to die. But Obama and his aides have not provided any.
Rather than defend their actions, Obama and his advisers first sought to cover up what happened by blaming the acts of war on that YouTube video.
When that line of argument collapsed of its own absurdity, Obama shifted to blaming the messenger.
His campaign accused everyone asking for facts and truthful explanations about what happened in Benghazi of trying to politicize the attack.
Obama himself has twice struck the Captain Renault pose and declared himself “Shocked, shocked!” that anyone would dare to insinuate that he did not do everything in his power to save the lives of the Americans whose lives he failed to save.
The reason specific sectors of a society usually feel compelled to vote on the basis of their sectoral interests rather than their general interests as citizens of their country is that they feel that one candidate or party specifically endangers their sectoral interests. Hence, the Lena Dunham ad, which insults women specifically, compels women to vote as women against Obama.
In the case of Obama’s appeasement of the Muslim world, there is no specific group that is hurt more than any other group by his policies.
As we saw in Libya, Egypt, Tunis, Yemen and beyond, his appeasement policies endanger all Americans equally.
This is not the case with Obama’s treatment of Israel and Jews. Obama’s supporters always highlight statements he has made and actions he has taken in relation to Israel and Jews that are relatively supportive of both.
To be sure, like every other US president, Obama has made some statements, and taken some actions, that have been supportive of Jews and of Israel. But unlike most other US presidents, he has made far more statements and taken far more actions that have been contemptuous and hostile to Israel and Jews. And this is inexcusable.
It is inexcusable that Obama uses coded anti- Semitic language to blame America’s economic woes on “fat cat bankers.” It is inexcusable that his secretary of state and his senior advisers have repeatedly made references to the so-called Israel Lobby to explain why America is supposedly hamstrung in its ability to sell Israel to the wolves.
It is inexcusable that Obama sends his surrogates before the cameras to refer to Israel’s prime minister as “ungrateful,” or to castigate Israel for permitting Jews to build homes in Jerusalem on land they own and for permitting Jews to exercise their legal rights to their property – simply because they are Jews.
Israel is the US’s most important ally in the Middle East. As such, it deserves to be treated well by the US – all the time. Any move to treat Israel with contempt is an unprovoked hostile act and therefore inexcusable.
So, too, US Jews have a right to make an honest living doing anything they wish – including working on Wall Street or owning a casino in Las Vegas. Jews have a right to be treated with respect by the US government. They should not have to be concerned about having their reputations maligned by politicians who use anti-Semitic tropes to gain political advantage.
Obama’s contemptuous vilification of Israel and successful American Jews make him bad for Jews specifically. Just as the Dunham ad exposes his underlying hostility towards women and so makes clear that women’s interests are imperiled by his presidency, so Obama’s repeated hostile treatment of Israel and American Jews make him a specific danger to Jewish interests.
MANY WOULD-BE deep thinkers have proclaimed that the presidential election is a choice between two competing narratives. But that isn’t an accurate description of the race.
Only Republican nominee Mitt Romney is presenting a narrative. In his narrative, the US faces very difficult problems in domestic and foreign policy alike. Romney has laid out his priorities for which problems he wishes to contend with, and has presented policies he will adopt to do so if he is elected next Tuesday.
On the other hand, by Obama’s telling, the real problems America faces are all the result of the empowerment of his political opponents and America’s allies.
Benghazi wouldn’t be a problem if his political opponents weren’t talking about it. Jihadists aren’t a problem. The problem is the people who say they are a problem. The national debt isn’t a problem. The problem is the “fat cat bankers.”
Women will vote for him because we are dimwitted sex objects. And Jews will vote for him because we are taken in by his occasional Borscht Belt schmaltz platitudes about Hanukka.
God help us all if his contemptuous assessment of his countrymen is borne out next Tuesday.
Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.
© 2012 Caroline Glick
Here are some email musings by Tony Newbill that are excellent reasons NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama. Be sure to look at his links to comprehend with clarity his point.
President Obamas Over Regulation is costing the Middle Class 1.75 trillion a Year!!!!
Sent: 10/19/2012 11:07 AM
Read where the Middle Class is getting screwed by Obama Regulation Policy and where we can Balance the national DEBT in 8 years without one single cut to Entitlement spending!!!!!! OMG, are we STUPID or what? Being safe is fine but at a cost of 1.75 trillion? Hell that’s 18% of GDP with no benefit to supply expansion to lower inflation cost of Living. Come on Mr. President you have to be smarter than this???
Scroll down to the segment about: “Regulations” where Senator Mike Johanns Talks about an Obama regulation COST PER YEAR of 1.75 Trillion:
Redirect the Way Money is invested NOW!!!!
Sent: 10/19/2012 11:48 AM
Redirect the Way Money is invested NOW!!!! First by reversing this ANTI-growth policy ….
President Obama’s Over Regulation is costing the Middle Class 1.75 trillion a Year!!!!
Read where the Middle Class is getting screwed by Obama Regulation Policy and where we can Balance the national DEBT in 8 years without one single cut to Entitlement spending!!!!!! OMG are we STUPID or what? Being safe is fine but at a cost of 1.75 trillion? Hell that’s 18% of GDP with no benefit to supply expansion to lower inflation cost of Living. Come on Mr. President you have to be smarter than this???
Scroll down to the segment about: “Regulations” Where Senator Mike Johanns Talks about an Obama regulation COST PER YEAR of 1.75 Trillion:
And then by enabling small and Big Business to innovate the solutions needed to stabilize this Threat to Humanity!!! The U.S. Government Warns: High Food Prices To Hit Americans Hard
RE: President Obamas Over Regulation is costing the Middle Class 1.75 trillion a Year!!!!
Sent: 10/20/2012 8:10 PM
It’s all about this Perception that the Policies President Obama is implementing are designed to cause destabilization. Read the last part of this article like the last paragraphs; it talks about the need for destabilization to cause a SHIFT. And it will come with the collapse of the dollar as world trade currency. Everything they relate to in this article is pointed at the economic system and that is all about the Dollar and its Representation of our system called Capitalism that supports a Free Market system that these Globalists all see as standing in the way of their ability to bring the Fundamental Change Obama wanted and told us all about in 2008.
Toward the end of this and actually all through it, are talks about these elites causing some kind of event to open the door for a SHIFT – check it out:
Paul Ryan Makes a Great debate with President Obama on Taxes and …
Sent: 10/21/2012 10:34 AM
Paul Ryan Makes a Great debate with President Obama on Taxes and How Obama says Raising taxes when the Economy is Facing major head winds is the Wrong Approach, and today is no different than 2 years ago, because we have a Food Inflation Situation on the Horizon that Obama is not even taking into Consideration and is Not doing anything about; like enabling innovative solutions to alter this lack of supply in food production. Mitt Romney’s Plan will!!!
We have to Take this SERIOUS and Obama Is Not Leading this Demand with Solutions!!!!!!
U.S. Government Warns: High Food Prices To Hit Americans Hard
Why Hasn’t President Obama placed More effort into developing this Energy???
Sent: 10/22/2012 8:09 AM
I bet Romney won’t do this if he’s President
Sent: 10/23/2012 8:04 AM
I bet Romney won’t do this if he’s President. It’s a disgrace against all those who have been defending the USA!!!!! Oh I guess it’s the Chickens coming home to roost isn’t it?!!!!
You want to talk about a very serious issue regarding the way Women want to feel secure in knowing they have a President looking out for their Communities, families and children’s best security Concerns? Then this has to be the thing that needs to be stopped NOW with the elections of a President that will not BOW DOWN like this!!!! How can you consider this being a defense of U.S. Women, Men and children? We the people did not start this. Tell us – why we deserve this kind of Leadership? That’s just a salt being rubbed in the wound of a nation’s people that just want to be left alone.
Expose the Fake Transparency of the Obama Administration
Sent: 10/23/2012 7:52 PM
John this gal needs to be in an ad to expose the fake transparency of the Obama Administration??? This is so not presidential for a Sitting President to be doing this to the Journalists who are educated to seek the truth for you and me and all of we the people???
Obama is running around shutting everyone up that will say anything. You throw this censorship into the Mix and we gotta Totalitarianism Administration on our hands Big Time. Because why censor the people when you just have to censor the ones that Inform the people? LOL Oh Yeah….. Read what this Award Winning Journalists has to say about our President:
Here’s the Low down on the Journalist’s plight on seeking the truth about the President’s FAILED foreign Policy in the Middle East:
A little trickle down totalitarianism with the Truth?
Sent: 10/23/2012 9:56 PM
Blurred Line Between Espionage and Truth
Obama’s War on Journalism:
Obama targets journalists:
Obama Economic Plan and Inflation, Jobs and Supply Expansion
Sent: 10/24/2012 11:25 AM
This economic Plan of Obama’s does nothing to address the areas where Inflation is telling us we need Jobs and supply expansion, but instead allows Ideological Bureaucracies to DICTATE how and where the Money for investments is to be spent and create JOBS … What you have then is a Politically driven supply-side system that will run YOU OUT OF SUPPLY because LOOK at how the Environmentalists are DICTATING SUPPLY-SIDE ECONOMIC ANTI-GROWTH POLICY while they and the Obama CZARS are constantly talking about the need for ZERO Growth and Global Population Controls. Don’t you think that’s a dangerous ideology to be vesting and consolidating power into these kinds of Policy makers????
You and I and everyone will become JUST Numbers in these Ideologue’s Minds, and this proves that with the exposure of how Obamacare really will assimilate your treatment. Think John; look at the Records of how the Obama CZARS think. They are the Mechanism that Operates Obama. Obama said, “Judge Me by the People I surround myself with“. For crying out loud John don’t be fooled!!! Here’s the guy that wrote the OBAMACARE Bill:
Ezekiel Emanuel told CNN recently “personalized medicine is a myth,” he was fully reflecting the worldview of the authors of health reform.
Obama and UN: Redistribution of Wealth
Sent: 10/25/2012 9:25 AM
The Mechanism of Redistribution of Wealth that both Obama and the UNITED NATIONS is cited in these articles.
The results of this Fundamental Transformation Obama Says on the stump that, “We Have Come Too Far Now to Turn Back to the Old tired ways of the Bush Years of failed Economic policies,” will ACTUALLY be one of Reduced supply as the Free Market driven by the Consumer Driven demand will be Controlled by the Global Governments as they substitute the Free Market Currency in their transactions with the Central Banks’ Game Plan – One World Currency called the SDR:
And at the same time Obama and the United Nations Global Tax Initiative that Obama supports. See here:
Opinion: In Second Term, Obama Will Allow UN To Tax Americans
[Obama-UN] Will be taking Capital Formation away from the Free Market, shrinking the supply and causing a collapse of the capital system dropping all the control over resources into the laps of these Global Central Banks and Governments. And they will be able to squeeze societies’ rate of consumption there by reducing what they consider the Cause of the Destruction of Earths Eco System. And in the process they will also accomplish their goal silently of Depopulation through a reduction of the Supply Abundance that Directly Effects the Human Life span, while convincing everyone that it’s all good that the Eco System is Healing. As this Obama CZAR adviser talks about here:
Obama supporter and Depopulation proponent like Obama CZARS Ted Turner: I Think It’s “Good” U.S. Troops are Killing Themselves
If Gas Prices Skyrocket Expect another U.S. Credit Downgrade
Sent: 10/25/2012 12:37 PM
If you want Gas Prices to SKYROCKET to mathematically stall growth to cause a further down grade of the US Credit system then ARM and work with The radicals in the Middle East to destabilize the Free market world pricing system.
(Goal of the Obama Environmentalist Marxists Ideologues to collapse Capitalism and save Earth from Consumer driven free markets)
Beck: ‘Something Is Very Very Wrong Here!’ Clare Lopez – Ex-CIA Officer
Stocks slip after downgrade rumor
The Coming Global Disorder
(About the Author: Bret Stephens is the deputy editorial page editor of the Wall Street Journal and the author of the paper’s “Global View,” a weekly column.)
Voting Against President Obama – IS ABOUT STOPPING THIS EGREGIOUS ERRONEOUS IDEALOGICAL BUREAUCRACY THAT IS RUNNING OVER THE UNITED STATES PEOPLE’S RIGHTS, THEIR LIBERTIES AND THEIR RIGHT TO HAVE A JUST GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, and has no regard as to how they are Spending the People’s MONEY!!!! This Administration has made it CLEAR they DO NOT ANSWER TO WE THE PEOPLE and therefore we need to REPLACE and RESTORE our REPRESENTATION THAT DOES THIS!!!!!
Romney Platform for Global Peace
Use the Element of Supply and Abundance Like JFK
Sent: 10/27/2012 8:21 AM
Romney wants to use the element of Supply and Abundance as a Platform to build Peace around the world Again Like JFK did.
[Editor: Obama wants to use the element of Redistribution.]
Obama is really good at figuring out how to get something from producers for nothing or very little; hence the Grant Foundation, nonprofit world of finance. His record shows this is where he has spent most of his time making his living [Editor: i.e. living as Community Organizer]. So considering he is conflicted by most of these kinds of institutions’ policies of ANTI-growth initiatives he cannot be a Creator of supply-side economics because his philosophy is skewed.
Obama has No BUSINESS being a Majority interest policy maker because of this limited economic philosophy, let alone this being a major conflict on world economics being the Platform for Supply-side Abundance being the Path towards Peace Like his Predecessors like Kennedy had used in their peace policy before him.
Child Indoctrination Video Alert: Blame Your Parents if Obama Loses the Election
Sent: 10/27/2012 11:24 AM
If you look in between the rhetoric you can find the plan of domination of the minds of children to bring about the fundamental transformation the elite Environmentalist Marxist Bolsheviks want to take control of everything with ….
Edited by John R. Houk
Caroline Glick is a Jewish gal that has been born, raised and educated in the USA. She moved to Israel to further her education and has been involved with the political process in Israel. I believe she holds a dual citizenship with Israel and America.
I mention this about Glick because the link to her essay that showed up in my inbox are her musings about the ramifications of the U.S. elections on November 6, Iran’s looming nuclear weapon production, Israel’s ability to attack Iranian nuke sites and America’s support or lack thereof in backing an Israeli attack on Iranian nuke sites.
Of question for those who don’t follow international geopolitics has to ask – why is Israel interested in destroying Iran’s nuclear weapons capability? The reason is Iran has threatened Israel’s existence since the Mullah revolution in 1979 and especially since the Administration Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as President. Ahmadinejad has been rattling the Iranian military sword against Israel’s existence in ever increasing ways.
So prepare to get your thinking cap on and to muse with Caroline Glick about the USA, Iran and Israel.
John R. Houk
© October 25, 2012
The murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other American officials in Benghazi, Libya is indeed beginning to sound like a reprehensible scandal of lies, deceit and abandonment to terrorism that we can and should call Benghazigate.
It seems like every day snippets of information are released revealing the true picture of what happened in Benghazi. It has been revealed that the State Department knew within two hours the attack was planned and organized by terrorists AND that they knew who the terrorists were – Ansar al-Sharia which is an al Qaeda connected Islamic Terrorist group.
So here is the picture: the State Department and White House knew this was a terrorist attack yet the White House, Secretary of State Clinton and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice all laid the blame for the deaths of Americans in Benghazi to a badly made movie trailer entitled “Innocence of Muslims”. If you had seen this trailer you would understand this movie had quality of garage production mocking Mohammed. Would Muslims be offended? Absolutely! Would Muslims across the Islamic world spontaneously riot on the anniversary of 9/11 attacking American Embassies because of a movie trailer of dubious quality that had been out for months? NO! Spontaneity indicates no planning.
Fox News Video: When will We Know the Truth about Benghazi Attack?
The reality is there was nothing spontaneous about any of the riot attacks on American Embassies in the Islamic world. They were all organized by Islamic Terrorists or purist Islamic organizations (aka Radical Islam or Islamism) to coordinate with the Islamic attack on American soil on 9/11. In Libya’s case the riot was incited as a ruse to a pre-planned attack on the Benghazi Consulate with the intention to kill the inhabitants. The only thing I wonder about is if the Ansar al-Sharia terrorists knew that Ambassador Chris Stevens was there on that day. I wonder this because it has been proven that Ambassador Stevens had asked for more security because of the suspicion of an imminent terrorist attack.
The response to the request was to ignore it. That means the State Department ignored the threat or was following Obama guidelines to beef up a military presence at the Libyan Embassy and Consulate. Why would such a request be ignored by the Obama Administration? My guess is that at the time it was more of a priority to be non-aggressive to the Muslim world than it was to protect Americans on diplomatic soil considered American because maintaining a politically correct image to anti-war Leftist-Democratic Party constituents in an election year was more important.
The attitude of trying to paint Romney a warmonger by Obama in the last debate brings me to this conclusion. If Romney would have gone after Obama’s failure at Benghazigate President Obama was obviously prepared to paint a picture that he was the man of international peace and that Romney would be a warmonger President if elected. I am certain it would yet another blame Bush moment. Obama would deceitfully paint the picture Bush started unnecessary wars and perpetuated them into long years, then Obama would come and deliver America from a decade’s long war began by Bush Republicans. Obama would accuse Romney of perpetuating the Bush legacy of war.
As if it was wrong for President Bush go after the foreigners that attacked Americans on American soil, right? AGAIN wrong! America should seek to destroy Islamic terrorists globally that might be a threat to Americans at home or Americans travelling abroad. To do anything else is just idiotic appeasement. The foreign policy of appeasement is just a projection of weakness that incites violence against the appeasers.
How wise a man is Mitt Romney? Wise enough to know that Obama is a master manipulating deceiver! Obama prepared for the last debate to confront his Benghazigate lies by deflecting that Romney was a warmonger. Romney was ready and thus did allow the deceiver-President to manipulate Romney’s image.