John R. Houk
© June 5, 2013
I am leaning more and more toward the opinions of Danny Jeffrey. When Danny sees himself through the eyes of some of his readers he reports that he is a doom and gloom writer. I am not really sure if Danny actually believes this about being this kind of writer. I can tell you this though. He has been right on over time relating to his observations of Americans losing their spine because of the plague known as political correctness. Danny views Americans as becoming so programmed by political correctness that they are too weak to confront the transformative “Change” Barack Hussein Obama has been molding America into.
If Danny is again correct in his observations about the American emerging persona then the America Conservatives believe in is already dead. Danny’s analysis leads to only one solution AND that means only one shot to keep the Founding Fathers’ experiment of a nation in which the primary principle for being is Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The question then is – what is that one shot?
That shot is armed rebellion. The awakening of enough Americans occurs that a second Civil War erupts. The first Civil War was more than about freeing the Slaves. The Southern States were upset that a Federal government had power over their State sovereignty to tell them to free the Slaves. The Southern States formed their Confederacy in order to be a part of a nation in which the rule of law pertaining cultural custom was preserved to the individual States.
The second Civil War – if it comes to that – will be about preserving the Union according to the vision of the Founding Fathers in limited government and the belief that cultural harmony is maintained by a rule of law influenced by Christian Morality rather than a rule of law based on human fiat determining a moral society.
Yeah I did a little extrapolating that I am uncertain if Danny would agree with; ergo I inserted my two cents.
The kind of politics that Danny Jeffrey is talking about seems to assume Obama has no intention of leaving the Office of President of the United States (POTUS). As 2016 approaches some kind of Martial Law would be instituted under the guise of politically correct propaganda telling We the People should submit for the greater good of the nation. Danny believes that most Americans will comply and those that don’t comply will have their guns forcibly removed by some kind of government SWAT under the thumb of the new Obama regime. The Obama regime will undoubtedly have Leftist collaborators popular with Left leaning Americans. Think of a possible Marxist Oligarchic Politburo that will include say Bill and Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and perhaps some other Leftists you could think of.
Danny does not speculate how a Second Civil War would break out to form a more perfect Union. It is my guess there would be a few generals and admirals out there that do not desire to be under a Marxist thumb. A George Washington type general would have to emerge to instill trust in potential rebelling troops against the Obama Marxist Oligarchy. And such a general would have to emerge that also has the ability to reignite the remnants of Constitutional Originalist Conservatives willing to live and die to bring down an unjust government and restore Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
OR we can pray Danny is incorrect and there still are Americans with a Politically INCORRECT spine to begin Obama’s demise with a Conservative dominated House and Senate in 2014. This Conservative House can impeach Obama and this Conservative Senate (sans Dem leader Reid) can convict Obama. This is to all lead to the greatest prosecution for justice against the most corrupt government in American history.
OR Danny is correct and societal chaos will give Obama the excuse to institute Martial Law and only as the public openly dissents and various generals and admirals join public dissent then a Second Civil War saves or dooms America.
Hmm… This could be a Big Brother moment for Danny or me. I wonder if Obama’s IRS will give either of us an invitation.
John R. Houk
© June 3, 2013
The blogger Danny Jeffrey has often been critical of the U.N. and Obama international principle of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The public presentation of R2P is that the international community has a responsibility to protect civilians of a nation placed in a life threatening dangerous position from either its government or perhaps internal terrorism the local government cannot cope with or both. AND that sounds altruistic enough, don’t you think?
Jeffrey’s criticism is simple. R2P is a tool of Leftist Globalists and the U.N. to have an excuse to further the agenda of a global New World Order under some kind of dual Leftist-Islamic design. Danny Jeffrey off the top of my head seems to emphasize the Caliphate agenda of Radical Islam.
I say “off the top of my head” because it seems that Danny’s essays that I have read tend to be suspicious of Islam’s goal to destroy Israel and the Leftist tend to agree with that agenda. I personally think global Leftists and the Caliphate agenda Muslims are taking advantage of each other with the intention of screwing each other over. My reasoning for this thinking is that Leftists are not fond of religious influence in general and Islam is not fond of any other religions or ideologies that are secularist at best and atheistic at worst. As far as Islam is concerned that would run the Leftist gamut of Secular Humanist Socialists to atheistic Marxists.
Thus in my line of thinking the Leftist-Radical Islam unity is more like an “enemy of my enemy is my friend” agenda until that enemy is eliminated. If that situation occurs you can imagine the global bloodlust that would follow a global Leftist vs. global Muslim Caliphate war. It would be like medieval days when the winners destroyed en masse the losers. Protocols of modern Western Civilization would be totally thrown out the door while such a war would be a series of battles in which each battle victory by either side would be an ethnic cleansing moment until the victors would be the only ones standing after ethnic cleansing annihilation.
A global Leftist-Caliphate war would be an End Times apocalypse in nature.
In this sense I agree with Danny that R2P is a nefarious thing that the long term affects will be of no good for people (Mostly Americans) who love Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The long term affects of R2P will strengthen the ulterior motives of global Leftists and global Caliphate Muslims to the horrible misfortune of Christians and Bill of Rights minded Americans. Both Christians and Bill of Rights minded Americans are the target of destruction by global Leftists and global Caliphate Muslims.
However when it comes to Syria, I believe dumping Bashar al-Assad will throw a monkey wrench in the Caliphate agenda because it will highlight the mutual hatred that Sunnis and Shias have for each other. Sunnis represent roughly 90% of Islam and Shias represent roughly 10% Islam.
The largest Shia nation is Iran of which that nation’s Mullocracy are mostly Twelver Shias. They are called Twelvers because they believe a Twelfth or Hidden Imam will reveal himself and force Islam upon the whole Earth. That Twelfth Imam is a direct descendant of the Prophet Mohammed. Therein lay the hatred between Sunnis and Shias.
The Sunnis beat back the Shias in a war in which the last Mohammed relative that was a Caliph – Ali – had his Caliphate terminated by assassination. The Shias believed only a person of a Mohammed ancestry line could guide Muslims as Caliph. Allegedly the last living relative of Mohammed (the twelfth in lineage that is) disappeared. I am uncertain what the Sunnis believe about this guy – perhaps Sunnis believe he was killed or perhaps never existed; thus ending any claim to a hereditary Caliphate. I am certain that the Shias believe this twelfth Imam and descendant of Mohammed via Ali went into some sort of occultation to be hidden until the time was right for revealing himself to secure the Earth for Islam.
Okay that is a brief summary of the Sunni-Shia divide that is roughly correct but I am sure is filled with anomalies from the Sunni or Shia perspective.
The thing is Iran – a Shia theocratic nation – has regional designs as in being the top Muslim dog in the Middle East. Iran is the only Muslim nation that has an open destructive against both Israel and America that will undoubted be threatening because the development of nuclear weapons.
Iran’s principle allies in the region are Assad’s Shia-Alawite minority Syrian government and Hezbollah-Shia terrorist dominated Lebanon. Taking out Assad from this religious maniac alliance of Iran-Syria-Hezbollah will disrupt the military designs of Iran.
Of course the problem that Danny will point is that Syrian rebels fighting against Assad are religious nuts of radical Sunni-Muslims that essentially and probably will lead to a problem for the USA and Israel. My thinking is though that the USA and Israel already have a problem with Israel. So why not place Iran is a situation that some of their nefarious regional goals are disrupted by killing or booting Assad out of Syrian control?
So here I am in the unenviable position of both agreeing and disagreeing with Danny Jeffrey’s most recent essay on R2P, aiding the Syrian rebels, Obama’s support of those rebels and Senator McCain’s pushing Obama to support those rebels.
And yet I also have to tell you that Obama is the most corrupt President as to supporting the Constitutional principles of the Founding Fathers since Aaron Burr almost attained that Presidency in our then young Republic. When Obama says “Change” he means transform America away from the Bill of Rights and to at least make America a Multiculturalist Socialist-Democratic nation and at worst a Marxist utopia with no Liberty whatsoever.
John R. Houk
© May 17, 2013
Danny Jeffrey wrote an essay complete with a pictorial entitled “The Cave Dwellings of Afghanistan”. The theme is that Afghanis are primitive people that survived centuries of invasions because of their mountainous terrain that has developed cave dwelling system for periods of defense and reclaiming their land after wearied invaders either left or were assimilated into the tribal situations. Thus Afghanis are not now nor will be amenable to Western ways.
I concur with Danny but there were legitimate reasons for America to invade Afghanistan. Now those reasons have been answered and it is time to leave.
The reason for invading Afghanistan is because the then ruler – the One-Eyed Mullah Omar – provided protection to Usama bin Laden as the head of al Qaeda sent Islamic terrorists to the USA that became responsible for around 3000 deaths on American soil. We chased UBL for about a decade until we found him and killed him out in Pakistan.
Being Americans we have attempted to build an infrastructure in Afghanistan that includes democratic principles. Frankly I was all for that agenda; however time has proven that Islam and Western democratic principles are incompatible.
So what’s left? In my thinking it would be to get Mullah Omar who protected UBL. The thing is the One-Eyed Mullah is only alive by reputation. He has not made any verifiable appearances since he fled the collapse of his Taliban regime as the American led forces commenced their invasion:
“…there have been no verifiable communications on paper, by phone, or in audio or video recordings from the so-called Leader of the Faithful, since he disappeared into the Kandahar mountains on the back of a motorcycle in November 2001 as his regime collapsed.” (Taliban Forces Desperate to Hear from Their Absent Leader, Mullah Omar; By Ron Moreau; The Daily Beast; 5/1/13 4:45 AM EDT)
If Mullah Omar is alive he is hiding so deep that the Islamic Terrorists that swear allegiance to him don’t even know if he is running the Taliban terrorist show.
So here’s my thinking: UBL is dead, the Afghan Muslim people are less than pleased with any contribution to Afghanistan and Mullah Omar isn’t running the Taliban operationally.
It is time to leave Afghanistan to its own devices with a warning of future devastation if any Afghan government supports Islamic terrorism on the American homeland. Incidentally devastation does not mean another invasion; it means some kind tactical military action up to and including a small nuke strike to make a point about the long arm of American military might.
John R. Houk
© May 15, 2013
On May 12th I cross posted Danny Jeffrey’s essay “The Decline and Fall of America” preceded by my thoughts entitled “One Man Rule will END the Constitution”. Danny’s essay was originally written on May 8, 2013.
Danny has followed up his essay that is entitled “The Decline and Fall of America 2.0”. This essay explores furthers parallels between the Fall of Rome and the current apparent decline leading to the fall of America. This essay is more directed to laying blame on President Barrack Hussein Obama. I enjoy that Danny prefers to call the President by Hussein Obama. The unspoken meaning is exposing Obama’s preference for the Radical Muslim agenda. In my opinion the Benghazigate scandal underlines that Radical Muslim preference. I have no idea for Obama’s preference toward Radical Islam because he at the very least is a Socialist and at worst a Marxist Transformist in the tradition of Antonio Gramsci and Saul Alinsky. Neither one of those Marxists were fans of religion; however both had no problem in infiltrating religion to influence the masses to fall for Marxist Utopianism.
Perhaps a decent guess is Obama the Marxist Transformist has an affinity for Muslims because his early life was centered on Islamic culture and education PLUS he may view Islam as a component to disenfranchise Christianity and the Christian Moral ethic from American culture. Applying this assumption, Obama also uses Secular Humanistic moral (or is it immoral) ethics to ALSO disenfranchise Christian Moral ethics from the lives of Americans.
Danny’s “The Decline and Fall of America 2.0” is a must read even I am a bit behind in promoting the essay.
Romulus Augustus Last Emperor of Western Roman Empire
John R. Houk
© May 12, 2013
Danny correctly observes the uncanny parallels between the Roman Empire and the United States of America. The only criticism I have and it is a bit silly is that the Roman Republic made Rome an empire. Rome’s decline began when the republican form of government was replaced by the rule of law of one man that utilized republic’s infrastructure to enforce the rule of one man. Rome exchanged the rule of law for the rule of man. When Octavius secured Roman government under his “enlightened” leaders he became Emperor. Octavius of the Republic was no more for he transformed into Augustus and essentially took his Uncle Julius’ family name as “Caesar” instead of the obvious “Emperor”.
Augustus’ Roman Empire was strong and succeeded hundreds of years after his death. Rome’s decline was the deficiency of one man rule of succeeding emperors that led quite immoral lives. Even though the Western half of the Roman Empire ended circa 475 AD according to famed historian Edward Gibbons, Western Roman already nearly non-existent by the time the last Emperor was defeated and deposed.
My point about the decline of Rome is if the USA has a parallel a one man rule will probably take place. Just as Augustus was perceived to be the savior from the chaos of Rome Republic rivals for power, then a similar parallel would occur in the USA.
Is America to the point that politically powerful people will divide the sympathies of Americans to the point that the U.S. Constitution is irrelevant? It could happen that factions tear Constitutional rule of law to pieces because of the feeling of desperation.
America’s only hope is for a consensus of voters become strong enough to elect Constitutional Originalists into Office and Constitutional Originalists are selected for the Federal Judiciary especially the Supreme Court.
Otherwise … Factions of the political spectrum will war for power with the winner taking all rendering the Constitution as a glorious document in the history of humankind.
Well those are my thoughts on Danny Jeffrey’s essay “The Decline and Fall of America”.
John R. Houk
© April 28, 2013
Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian regime is using chemical weapons to stop the momentum of the Syrian rebels from dethroning the Assad regime. Now I realize perhaps a half to even more than a half of the Rebels are radical Muslims perhaps making them no worse than Assad’s secular-socialized government dominated by Syria’s Alawite-Shia (See Here, Here and Here) minority. Nonetheless, chemical weapons are supposed to be illegal by international convention. I am guessing the U.N. Security Council could empower military sanctions against Assad’s regime.
Now I know many Conservatives – Danny Jeffrey comes to mind – are against the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). R2P apparently has a few criticisms such as providing an excuse to invade to accomplish the National Interests of perhaps an agreed coalition bloc of nations. And perhaps R2P could embroil the USA in a war that is conducted beyond the pale of the U.S. Constitution.
I believe removing Assad is as much in the National Interests of the USA as there is a R2P military reason to save civilian lives. Now Danny Jeffrey’s concern is that R2P strategy is an Obama mask to discreetly aid invading Arab or Muslim armies to take down the Leftist perceived threat to world peace in the Jewish State of Israel. With Obama at the helm of the U.S. government I can see Danny’s view of a reprehensible motive behind the Obama R2P agenda. President Barack Hussein Obama is NO friend of Israel. Obama has gone beyond satisfying political correctness by saying Palestinians deserve a sovereign nation to forcing the issue including robbing Israel of half its capital city of Jerusalem and giving that to Jew-Hating Arabs who call themselves Palestinians.
Why is it in America’s National Interest to remove Bashar al-Assad? Anything that throws a monkey wrench into the radical Islamic agenda of America’s enemy Iran is good for America and perhaps signals those Twelver maniacs that American muscle might actually spank Iran for making good on their threats to drive Israeli Jews into the sea.
The fine line at issue is what will the U.S. government do after aiding Syrian rebels to give the Assad regime a boot? It would be crazy to get rid of Assad and allow a radical Muslim government to form to be the Sunni mirror image of Iran’s Shi’ite Twelver radical Muslim government.
The information I have managed to cull about the nature of the Syrian Rebels is that the Islamist militias – especially Jabhat al Nusra – are gaining infrastructure control of the rebel held land in Syria. Even though the secular or more moderate Muslim rebels figured prominently early in the Syrian Rebellion against Assad, it appears the radical Muslims by virtue of infrastructure possession would evolve into the controlling faction of any future Syrian government absent of Assad. This would not be good for American National Interests. A Sunni Islamist theocratic nation will be as much of an enemy of the USA and Israel as Iran is. Indeed I suspect Iran would make friendly overtures to a Sunni Islamist regime even though Iran represents Shia Islam. Just for perspective you should know that Sunnis are about 90% of Islam while Shias are roughly 10% of Islam. Radical Muslim Sunni Clerics have labeled Shias a heretic religion thus making the Shias as much of an infidel as Jews and Christians. Perhaps even more worth of death than Jews and Christians because a Shi’ite existence could be perceived as an insult to Allah and Mohammed. Among radical Muslims, in particular insulting Mo and Allah, is a good reason for the execution of the death penalty.
So here are the horns of a dilemma the U.S. government faces. Help the Syrian Rebels defeat Assad quite probably bring into power a Jew-Hating and American-Hating Islamist government OR do nothing while Assad uses chemical weapons of mass destruction to reverse the defeat he has been experiencing utilizing conventional weapons against the Rebels. Undoubtedly an Assad victory to remain in power would result in a wholesale genocide of Sunni Rebels and the civilian Sunni population that supported the Rebels. An Assad victory would also mean acquiring hubris perhaps leading the dictator to make rash moves against American interests and Israel, feeling an illusion of being undefeatable.
In the realm of the lesser of two evils, it still seems to me Assad’s demise will in at least the short term be better for the National Interests of the USA even if the long term outcome of Assad’s removal may not be helpful. The best way to bring down Assad with the least amount of American blood is to provide arms to the Syrian Rebels. It may be a futile hope but weaponry should be distributed to the more secular minded Sunnis who desire an elected government rather than a theo-political Sharia religious government in which the religious elite call the shots.
It will be up to the U.S. government – cough the Obama Administration – to actively influence a relationship that is not inimical to American National Interests. That probably is a tough order for I sense even a secular government based on Islamic elections will still be a Jew-Hating anti-Israel government. Which brings us back to Danny Jeffrey’s thoughts that President Barack Hussein Obama will part of an agenda to use R2P to join Arab and Muslim government to end the existence of Israel.
I was brought to this line of thinking from reading a Caroline Glick article entitled, “Time to confront Obama”. Glick wants to confront Obama’s motives behind the decisions he has made relating to Islamic terrorism, his treatment of Israel, wondering the value the word of BHO in relation to the Chemical WMD attack perpetrated by Bashar al-Assad against his own citizens and so on.
As my thoughts began to evolve it became apparent I was following a different train of thinking than Ms Glick. Nonetheless, you should read her article which is anti-Obama and pro-Israel. I like that way of thinking.
John R. Houk
© April 5, 2013
Danny Jeffrey has posted “Middle East Problems … Only Beginning”. This is an awesome article about the Foreign Policy failures that afflicted three Presidential Administrations: Bush 1, Bush 2 and Obama.
I concur with Danny’s observations except perhaps with one small disagreement. Danny is critical of the Bush 2 agenda to implement democratic-republic forms of government in the Middle East with the belief that doing so would create better potential allies if voting citizens could make choices via elections to promote Human Rights and a better atmosphere for an economic-political situation to thrive benefitting the prosperity of the voters.
At the time I was 100% behind the Bush 2 Agenda to bring a democratic-republic form of government to the Middle East. Bush’s reasoning that nations that had experienced 25 to 50 years of oppression under Marxist/Leninist Communism began a freer life with Liberty’s benefits after the fall of the former Soviet Union.
The problem of nation-carving that Bush 2 (and to my chagrin) ran into was theo-political Islam. A monolithic religion patterned after the conquest paradigm manufactured by Islam’s prophet Mohammed. Unlike other religions Islam’s eventual holy writings lay out the principles that combine religion, politics and martial evangelism. Islam’s religion, politics and martial evangelism are all integrated on a unified basis as a platform to govern the lives of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The non-Muslims allowed to live had to approve living an oppressed life as second class human beings surrendering any right of religious freedom and political freedom to the superiority of Islamic tenets. Any violation of those tenets by non-Muslims was and is regarded as an insult or an affronter to Islam and Mohammed.
For hundreds of years Islam was the minority religion in the Middle East, North Africa, conquered portions of Europe and India. Where Islam remained in control you can figure out why people began to convert to Islam making the indigenous religions the minority.
With a thousand years of Islamic Supremacist theo-political ideology ingrained into the conquered nations and tribes of people, it is fairly clear the reason why Bush 2’s democracy planting has not worked or when it did work the people chose Islamic Supremacism via the cultural implementation Sharia Law as the basis as the rule of law. Sharia and democratic-republic political structure are diametrically opposed to each other.
Bush 2’s error was not backtracking on this realization concerning Sharia and democracy. Rather President George W. Bush began either self-deception or overt deception to Americans by choosing to tell us that Islam is a religion of peace. Of course those tagged as Moderate Muslims affirmed Bush’s pronouncement of another peaceful Judeo-Christian-like religion as in Islam was and/or is true. This assertion of peace is propagandized to non-Muslims even though Islamic holy writings indeed advocate violence against non-Muslims and against Muslims that broke Sharia or apostatized.
Like Danny I was also under the sway of former Secretary of State Condi Rice’s Foreign Policy intellectualism. It has become apparent that Rice is akin more to Establishment Republicans and RINOs than to the principles of the Conservative base of the GOP. Let’s face it. The only reason the Republican Party exists as a political entity is because Conservative voters are the power base. The Establishment GOP and the RINOs have united to call the shots within the Republican Party via control of the purse strings. These elitists of the GOP pander to Conservatives to remain a political force in the USA. Condi Rice is a part of those elitists in the GOP.
Otherwise I am in complete agreement with Danny Jeffrey’s “Middle East Problems … Only Beginning”.
John R. Houk
© December 11, 2012
I began reading a post at Freedom Rings 1776 by Danny Jeffrey. As I was reading the post I had the intention of g+1-ing the post. However, the essay is so good that it has reawakened in me the context that Islam, as a religion is the vilest on earth.
Danny writes about the idiocy of Liberals accepting violence inherent among Muslims as an aberration rather than common. The Quran, Hadith and Sira are commands and recorded history for Muslims to follow. Acts of violence are promoted and in many cases commanded against those breaking Sharia Law or against a person that is a non-Muslim (infidel, kafir, dhimmi or whatever).
In fairness there is a lot of morality and peace promoted among Muslims in the Quran, Hadith and Sira as well; however “morality and peace” is for good Allah-submitted Muslims that are to reverence with honor Allah’s Prophet Mohammed (The Islam most Muslims practiced though contrary to their holy writings). There is little to zero tolerance for breaking reverence to Mohammed and openly insulting Allah.
Islam is a martial religion. Jesus commands His believers to go into all the world and share the Good News of Salvation and Deliverance from the chains of this wicked world. Islam’s Allah wants his adherents to go into all the world with an army and offer acceptance to the submission of Allah peacefully. If there is a refusal to submit to Allah, the army will make the attempt to conquer the people. In the process of the conquest Allah tells Mohammed it is acceptable to pillage, rape, and where appropriate turn the conquered into slaves and where it is more expedient to kill the unbelieving conquered people.
This is how Islam was spread in its early days under Mohammed and his succeeding Caliphs. The spread of Islam was a bloody mess and especially on the Indian Sub-continent. The Hindus and Buddhists of India were considered polytheists and as such worse infidel than the People of the Book; i.e. Jews and Christians. Mohammed stole just enough stories from the Bible (the Book) and twisted them for Arab superiority with the hope of peacefully converting Jews and Christians to Islam.
Mohammed was not a Jew there was no way Jews would accept divine Prophethood from Mohammed. Not to mention the insult of changing the Word of God that the Promises of God came through Abraham and Isaac to Abraham and Ishmael considered the progenitor of Arabs.
The Christian distrust of Mohammed was based in part on the Jewish rejection. We Christians can add that Mohammed rejected Jesus Christ as the Son of God that died on the Cross.
18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the[a] Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things.[b] 21 I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and that no lie is of the truth.
22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2: 18-22 NKJV)
1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess that[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world. (1 John 4: 1-3 NKJV)
Once Mohammed figured out that persuasion was not going to convert Jews and Christians he mysteriously heard from Allah to offer three choices to the People of the Book: Convert willingly, Keep their religion but as a sub-class human that must submit to the rules of Allah OR Die.
As I said earlier Hindus and Buddhists did not fare so well with the ‘choice option’. Initially Hindus and Buddhists were offered convert, brutal slavery or die. After millions upon millions of India’s population were slaughtered someone came upon the bright idea of, ‘Wait a minute, if we exterminate all these polytheists we will not have people to do the labor needed to make the conquest thing operate well.’ Only then were Hindus and Buddhists (and whatever minor religion that developed on smaller scale) offered sub-human dhimmitude.
Danny Jeffrey makes reference to India’s tragedy in facing Muslims throughout history in a twenty minute video. Here is that video:
Danny effectively attacks the PC crowd that looks the other way about Islam. The information which I just wrote about is nothing compared to the WAKE-UP provided by Danny Jeffrey. Read Danny’s essay entitled “HONOR KILLINGS, RAPE GANGS, MUTILATIONS, AND THE RISE OF A DEATH CULT…ISLAM” and please realize that even a peace loving Islam that lives by only the peaceful portions of the Quran will adhere to the violence. Why? Muslims believe the Quran is infallible and that Mohammed was the perfect man.
Here are some quotes that you will read in Danny’s essay:
Jun 6, 2012 – Muslim dismembers wife in front of six children, throws head from rooftop … their six children before throwing her dismembered head from roof …
Jun 4, 2012 – A man is under arrest in Germany after killing his wife in front of his six young children and cutting her into pieces. Orhan Sircasi then ran on to …
Excerpt from Daily Mail UK:
“The 32-year-old killer of Turkish origin fought off police as they tried to seize him early this morning by lunging at them with the knife and swinging the head like a club.”
Picture the sheer horror of such a situation. This savage had just chopped his wife into pieces in front of his children, then with a knife in one hand and her head in the other he heads for the roof top. Then using his wife’s head as a club he attacks the police who are trying to take him into custody. I cannot help but feel sorry for those officers. It is only natural for any sane human being to recoil from a severed head and they had to arrest him. Let us go one horror further. He threw her head to the ground below. Imagine yourself walking past there and having it land in front of you, or worse still hitting you on the way to the ground. If you don’t think that man was a savage then you are reading the wrong essay, for I can call him no less.
They have a fondness for beheading their victims. This is one that I recall hearing about on Fox News right after it happened.
Mar 9, 2011 – A judge on Wednesday gave a Pakistani former television executive the harshest punishment he could for beheading his estranged wife: 25 …
Now this is one that I have a hard time with because political correctness has become so entrenched in our society that the police do their very best not to find Muslims guilty of one of these honor killings. No one repeatedly beats their own head against a coffee table until they are dead.
Florida: Muslim woman’s death accidental or an ‘honor’ killing …
May 21, 2011 – Muslim Woman’s Death Ruled “Accident” From the Florida Family …killed herself by repeatedly beating her head against a coffee table and the …
Anytime that an innocent person is murdered it is a tragedy. When that innocent victim happens to be child it is far worse. Complicating that issue, this child was slowly beaten to death over a period of months, for not memorizing the Qur’an.
Mother beat son to death for failing to learn the Koran by heart … http://www.telegraph.co.uk › News › UK News › Crime
2 days ago – A mother who beat her son to death for failing to learn the Koran by heart murdered him and burned his body to hide the evidence, a jury has …
While the problem is growing ever worse here, the U.S. by no means has a monopoly on honor killings. Europe, Asia, Africa, Indonesia … anywhere you find Muslims you find honor killings as part of their fundamental belief.
creepingsharia.wordpress.com/…/sweden-terrified-muslim-wo…May 10, 2012 –
I have always loved a good challenge. It makes life more interesting, but after what I have learned of Islam, were I challenged to find something good about the belief, I would forego the effort. Islam has NO redeeming qualities. It was founded by a bloodthirsty pedophile, and those who follow the teachings of the Qur’an are victims every bit as much as those who fall under the harsh sword of that wretched belief.
Embracing Female Genital Mutilation
frontpagemag.com/…q…/embracing-female-genital-mutilation/May 10, 2010 – It’s not awesome . . . but comparing it to more severe forms of female circumcision troubles me. . . . . And it’s not like Western culture is so free of ...
Muslim Child-Rape Gangs in Britain :: Gatestone Institute
May 21, 2012 – Nine Muslim men belonging to a child-rape gang in northwestern England have … Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for European Politics at the …
Feb 20, 2005 – There have, for example, been a number of gang-rapes of Swedish women by Muslim immigrants. But Swedes must be careful what they say …
May 9, 2012 – UK: Police didn’t investigate Muslim rape and prostitution gang for fear of being called racist. This isn’t a racial issue at all, in fact. It is an issue ...
1 day ago – I have a [male] slave I bought from an African country and arranged for his visa and stay till I got him to Saudi [Arabia]. His description: 1 – Black ...
Be sure to read all of Danny’s essay.
John R. Houk
© December 7, 2012
Thanks to Danny Jeffrey my memory was refreshed on this Ann Barnhardt that now has a desire to expose Islam’s nefariousness. Go Ann Barnhardt!
Barnhardt’s background is in marketing and you can read about that influence from her website’s about page. However, I want you to know another side of Ann Barnhardt which I found at Seraphic Secret:
Every once in a while Seraphic Secret comes across a story that is jaw dropping.
Barnhardt is a businesswoman, a devout Catholic, an American patriot, and a brilliant provocateur of Patton-like intensity.
She understands that we in the West are fighting a war against radical Islam. Further, she correctly perceives that some Americans, mostly the chattering classes—never underestimate an Ivy League education—are sliding comfortably into dhimmitude, subservience to Islam.
1. I have no doubt that some will accuse Barnhardt of insensitivity and being unnecessarily provocative. But let’s be clear, the jihadist strategy is designed to elicit this exact response. Thus, if appeased, Islam becomes a specially protected ideology and free speech is thrown out the window. Next comes polygamy, female genital mutilation, honor killings, the repression of Jews, Christians, homosexuals and finally, an inevitable slide into sharia, Islamic law, the antithesis of this Constitutional Republic.
4. You might object to Ann Barnhardt’s strident tone, you might shrink at the burning of a Koran, and you might feel that her entire presentation is far too militant, but there is no denying her conviction and courage. Like it or not her DNA is America’s best hope against those who would replace our freedom loving Republic with a barbaric 7th century caliphate.
“Suppose you prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Islam is constitutionally violent, where do you go from there?”
Answer: You go to and with Ann Barnhardt. (Excerpted from post entitled, “Ann Barnhardt: Warrior,” By ROBERT J. AVRECH on 4/6/12 – READ THE ENTIRE POST)
As Danny Jeffrey pointed out on his blog Freedom Rings 1776, Barnhardt provided a spunky Youtube video that defends Terry Jones (seemingly now annual) Burn the Quran mission. Jones has been labeled as a hater especially by the Multiculturalist Left and Muslim Apologists. Astonishingly many Conservatives and Counterjihad writers also have a bit of disdain for the Terry Jones mission to expose Islam as an evil religion.
Check out this two-part video presented by Ann Barnhardt in which she also burns the Quran. If you have heard Terry Jones, you will know that Barnhardt is way more articulate than Jones.
I found these particular videos on an Answering Muslims post entitled, “Ann Barnhardt Responds to Critics of Qur’an Burning.” You really should read that entire post as well. However, if you read the entire post by Seraphic Secret you will notice that those videos are also located there.
Now that I have gone into a swirl about Ann Barnhardt Let’s get back to Danny Jeffrey’s write-up on her. Danny focuses on a two hour plus seminar by Barnhardt that is about the failing economy. After all the Market is Barnhardt’s actual forte.
So below is the beginning Danny’s post. I usually like to cross post entire contents however this time it is more appropriate to continue reading at Danny’s blog. At Freedom Rings 1776 Danny has the two hour plus version and links to a breakdown of Barnhardt’s seminar in eight parts. Danny encourages you to bookmark his Barnhardt post so you can come back in convenient times to watches the eight parts. That is an excellent idea!
Here on my blog I am posting the Youtube Ann Barnhardt in its entirety.
Posted by Lentenlands
Posted Nov 10, 2012
This is a presentation by Ann Barnhardt addressing what’s happening right now in America. She has some interesting observations and ideas and it’s worth considering.
She has provided an attached workbook to accompany the presentation:
ANN BARNHARDT…THE ECONOMY IS GOING TO IMPLODE
By Danny Jeffrey
December 6, 2012
“The Economy Is Going To Implode And You Deserve To Understand Why.
A partial explanation in layman’s terms of the causes of the end of the world as you know it and a few suggestions for those of you who will be tasked with the rebuilding.”
The above message introduces a video by Ann Barnhardt that I truly hope you will choose to view. The full length version is two and one half hours long, and for the sake of convenience, for those pressed for time, it is also available in eight segments less than twenty minutes each.
The information she presents is absolutely essential for any who hope to survive coming events. If you are interested in learning what she has to offer you may want to bookmark this essay and return to view one or more segments at a time when time permits.
My experience with it: I started the full length version and left it running, listening to the audio, while I went on with my other work. About twenty minutes into it I realized that the other work was insignificant compared to what I was hearing and I devoted the next two hour watching Ms. Barnhardt deliver her message, and it came across well. That is why I implore each and all to view her video. What she has to say may actually save your life, or at least some of your wealth.
Ann Barnhardt is a thorn in the side of Progressive America. For the sake of clarity I shall define Progressive America as our elite leaders of both parties, all citizens who live off the efforts of other men, all corporations immersed in the Crony Capitalism that is destroying our economy, and those “Patriots” who are simply too busy watching their favorite program on TV to take the time to understand what is happening to America.
In this video that Ms. Barnhardt recently produced … just before the 2012 election, she speaks of the inevitable collapse and the war that follows, and then the ultimate task of rebuilding America.
Most are now familiar with … READ THE REST
Ann Barnhardt – Counterjihad and Economic Warning
John R. Houk
© December 7, 2012
ANN BARNHARDT…THE ECONOMY IS GOING TO IMPLODE
About Danny Jeffrey
I’m sixty seven and since Ronald Reagan left office I have watched my country slowly deteriorate as freedoms are lost and the value of our currency dwindles. This has been a slow but steady decline until Barrack Obama entered the White House. I will not refer to this man as President. That is a job that deserves respect and he has earned none at all. I am convinced that were it not for the Tea Party stirring up the public we would now be living under a total dictatorship. He seeks only power and has no loyalty at all to the United States, and as long as he is in office I shall write to any who will read and speak of what he is and what he is doing to this country.
Intro: If you do not Know What Resolution 16/18 is …
John R. Houk
Danny Jeffrey has some great thoughts on UN Resolution 16/18! I am so upset about UN Resolution 16/18 (April 2011 text) that I am willing to go to jail to engage in civil disobedience for limiting my 1st Amendment Rights. When you read the text of the resolution there is the first glance reaction is the language sounds amenable to the U.S. Constitution; the problem is about who frames or defines what is incitement to violence and the use of the Latin word inter alia which means ‘among other things’.
Inter alia is a Latin term that means “among other things” It is used to indicate that something is one out of a number of possibilities. For example, “he filed suit against respondents in state court, alleging, inter alia, a breach of contract.”
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) agrees to the wording of among other things because Muslims can cry incitement against Islam while hypocritically ignoring the incitement against Christians and Jews that clearly occurs in Muslim nations on a daily basis. Ergo no matter the defense by the U.S. State Department that Resolution 16/18 does not hinder the First Amendment (If you have the time it would be worth it to watch Heritage Foundation seminar criticizing UN Resolution 16/18) is either idiotic ignorance or deceitful propaganda.
I am cross posting Danny’s post “IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT RESOLUTION 16/18 IS THEN YOU ARE ASLEEP AND IN DANGER.” I should note that I am not the only blogger appreciating Danny’s thoughts. In Googling for background info the title came up all over the place, so there is a good chance you may have read it already. Even so I am guessing there are still a few folks that haven’t Danny’s post yet. Enjoy and think about what you read.